<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCT</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Cancer Therapy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2151-1934</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jct.2015.62013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCT-53643</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Predictive Factors of Bladder Tumor Recurrence after Nephro-Ureterectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ohn</surname><given-names>David Rebibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Emeric</surname><given-names>Lacarrière</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Francois</surname><given-names>Xavier Nouhaud</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Athmane</surname><given-names>Safsaf</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Romain</surname><given-names>Caremel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Pfister</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Urology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>christian.pfister@chu-rouen.fr(CP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>01</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>27</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of bladder cancer after nephro-ureterectomy (NUT) and determine the potential risk factors of bladder recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed 37 patients with UUT-UC including a significant follow-up after NUT of 34 months (range 12 - 120 months). The median age of the population was 72 years (range 48 - 83 years). Patients with a previous history of bladder cancer, concomitant diagnosis of bladder tumor and UUT-UC; or a metastatic UUT-UC were excluded from the study. Results: Out of these 37 patients, 17 presented a bladder recurrence within an average time of 12 months (range 3 to 31 months) after the NUT. In 94% of the cases, bladder recurrence occurred within the first 24 months following the NUT. Histological distribution was: 13 Ta tumors (76%), 2 pT1 tumors (11.7%); 11 patients had a high stage lesion (76%), whereas 4 patients had a low stage lesion (23.5%). As regards the anatomo-pathological characteristics of the UUT-UC, the supra iliac localization of the tumor is a significant risk factor of bladder recurrence (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Bladder recurrence after NUT occurred frequently and could have possibly been under-estimated. The use of intra-vesical instillation of Mitomycin C after NUT has been recently recommended by the European Association of Urology, but no predictive factors have yet been identified. Early diagnosis of bladder recurrence could certainly have reduced mortality in this patient population.  
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bladder Recurrence</kwd><kwd> Nephro-Ureterectomy</kwd><kwd> Urothelial Carcinoma</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) remains a rare pathology, with an annual incidence of 1 to 2 cases out of 100,000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref3">3</xref>] . During the diagnosis, 10% to 15% of patients have been detected to have synchronal bladder tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref3">3</xref>] , whereas 15% to 40% of patients developed bladder tumor recurrence within 18 to 24 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref4">4</xref>] . The presence of this type of lesion at diagnosis or during the clinical follow-up is a significant prognostic factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref5">5</xref>] . Nephro-ureterectomy (NUT) combined with an excision of the bladder cuff in order to avoid any bladder tumor recurrence remains the gold standard treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref6">6</xref>] . Various studies have reported predictive factors for bladder tumor recurrence: i.e. the multifocality of the lesions; previous medical history of bladder tumor; concomitant in situ carcinoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref11">11</xref>] ; tumor stage with lesions &gt; pT2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref10">10</xref>] ; high stage tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref13">13</xref>] ; size of the lesion &gt; 5 cm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref9">9</xref>] ; ureteral localization; and whether the NUT was performed by open surgery or laparoscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref9">9</xref>] . Two theories may explain the multifocality of the tumor as well as the risk of UUT- UC bladder recurrence. First, is the implantation of desquamated epithelial cells by the tumor present in the urine flow. Secondly, UUT-UC is considered as a general disease of the urothelium based on the field effect theory. Our objectives were to not only to evaluate the incidence of bladder cancer after NUT but also determine the potential risk factors of bladder recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>We retrospectively assessed a series of UUT-UC patients who had undergone a NUT between January 2000 and March 2011. During this period, different urologists were involved in the management of the NUT. Surgical indication and clinical follow-up was validated by a multidisciplinary team based on the recommendations of the Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology (CCAFU). Post-operative cystoscopy and urinary cytology were performed every 6 months for 2 years, and finally every year for 5 years; an abdominal-pelvic CT scan examination with late post-injection was carried-out every 2 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref3">3</xref>] . The exclusion criteria were: the patients with a previous history of bladder carcinoma (20 patients), diagnosis of concomitant bladder tumor with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (4 patients), metastatic UUT-UC (8 patients) and the patients with a follow-up less than 12 months after the NUT (6 patients). A total of 37 patients were included with a median follow-up of 34 months (range 12 to 120 months). The NUT was routinely performed with an excision of the bladder cuff, by lombotomy (20 patients) or by laparoscopy (17 patients) via an iliac approach. TNM classification was used for the urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and the bladder tumors. The tumor stage (OMS classification), the size of the lesion and its multifocality were also evaluated based on an histological examination of the biopsy tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref3">3</xref>] . All data were collected on Excel 2007 and the statistical analysis was performed with SAS software (version 9.3). Correlations on clinical and pathological levels were tested, using the Student’s-t- test as regards the quantitative variables, and the Chi-squared test for qualitative variables.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Among the 37 patients included in this study, 17 patients (46% of the cases) developed a bladder tumor recurrence within an average period of 12 months (range 3 - 31 months) after the NUT and 94% of them had a bladder recurrence within the two following years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The average age of the patients diagnosed with UUT-UC was 72 years (range 48 to 83 years), with a sex ratio of 2:1 (25 men and 12 women). The average age of the population with a bladder recurrence was 68.76 years (standard deviation 9.98). In our series, UUT-UC lesion was in the supra iliac ureter for 21 patients (52.5%) in the subiliac ureter for 19 patients (47.5%). When there was a bladder tumor recurrence, the histological distribution was: 13 patients pTa tumors (76%), 2 pT1 tumors (11.7%), 11 patients had a high stage lesion (64%) whereas 4 patients a low stage lesion (23.5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). We also assessed UUT-UC primitive lesion characteristics for the 17 patients with bladder tumor recurrence: in 82% of the cases, the tumor was low stage (14 patients) and in 3 cases the lesion was high stage (17.65%). Only one case of bladder recurrence had an in situ carcinoma. Moreover, 2 patients who were highly suspected to develop tumor recurrence died before the final histological diagnosis, they were not included in the 17 patients with bladder tumor recurrence. The UUT-UC localized in the supra iliac ureter had a higher risk of bladder recurrence (p = 0.04). We observed that 64% of the bladder tumors were at the same time high stage and mutlifocal tumors (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). As regards bladder recurrence topography, we noted that 47% of the lesions were found on the NUT homolateral bladder lateral side, whereas in 3 cases the bladder recurrence was situated near the area of</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Timeline of the first bladder recurrence after NUT</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8902023x6.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of the population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nombre de Patients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years) &lt;70 ans 70 - 79 ans &gt;79 ans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (40.54 %) 14 (37.83 %) 8 (21.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex Male Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (64%) 12 (36%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side of the tumor Right Left</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (51.28%) 17 (48.72%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumor localization Subiliac Supra iliac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (47.5%) 21 (52.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of the surgery Laparoscopy Lombotomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (45.9%) 20 (54%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumor stage pTa pT1 pT2 pT3 pT4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (29.7%) 10 (27.02%) 6 (16.21%) 9 (24.32%) 1 (2.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade Hight Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (83.78%) 6 (16.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uni/Multifocality Uni focal Multifocal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (91.89%) 3 (8.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumor size &lt;3 cm &gt;3 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (32.42%) 25 (67.56%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ureteral meatus resection. Finally, we did not observe any significant difference in the clinical-pathological characteristics between the two groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). After the diagnosis of bladder recurrence, a radical cystectomy was required for 6 patients following endovesical bacillus Calmette-Gu&#233;rin (BCG) therapy failure and/or tumor progression. As our database was established prior to the 2013 guidelines, no patient had immediate post-operative instillation of Mitomycin C. Nevertheless, 7 patients underwent adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The bladder is the main localization of tumor recurrence once the patient has been treated for urinary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC). Hirano et al. reported a bladder recurrence after a NUT in 34% of cases within an average period of 6.5 months (range 2.8 - 57.3 months) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref14">14</xref>] . In most cases, the diagnosis was made during the two first years of follow-up care: 45% (23 patients) had a pTa grade bladder lesion and 12 patients (23.5%) had a pT1 grade tumor. In a cohort of 482 patients treated by NUT for UUT-UC, Xylinas et al. observed that 35% of patients had a bladder recurrence with a median follow-up care of 39.5 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref15">15</xref>] . The results of our retrospective single-center series are in agreement data previously reported in literature. The primary challenge for a urologist remains the identification of high-risk patients, in order to prevent both bladder recurrence and any tumor progression. The importance of clinical-pathological parameters, i.e. tumor stage, cellular grade, localization of the UUT-UC, tumor multifocality and presence of carcinoma in situ has been demonstrated by different authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref14">14</xref>] and also observed in our series. Moreover, Pignot et al. in a retrospective study of 662 cases of NUT underlined that 83 patients (12.5%) had previous bladder cancer, 62 patients (9.4%) exhibited</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics between patients who had a bladder recurrence after nephro-ureterectomy (NUT) with those who had no recurrence</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No bladder recurrence (n = 20)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bladder recurrence (n = 17)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.85 &#177; 7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.76 &#177; 9.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.168</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex Male Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (60%) 8 (40%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (76.47%) 4 (23.53%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2862</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side Right Left</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (65%) 7 (35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (41.18%) 10 (58.82%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1473</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumor localization Supra iliac Sub iliac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (50%) 10 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (82.3%) 3(17.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumor size (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.22 &#177; 12.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.56 &#177; 11.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical procedure Laparoscopy Lombotomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (45%) 11 (53%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (43.75%) 9 (56.25%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9402</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade High Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (11%) 17 (85%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (17.65%) 14 (82.35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8277</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vascular embols</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (45%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (23.53%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1728</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumoral necrosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (10%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (6.25%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6858</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tumor stage pTa pT1 pT2 pT3 pT4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (10%) 8 (40%) 3 (15%) 6 (30%) 1 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (47.06%) 3 (17.65%) 3 (17.65%) 3 (17.65%) 0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uni/Multifocality Unif ocal Multifocal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (95%) 1 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (88.24%) 2 (11.76%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4525</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>concomitant bladder tumor with the diagnosis of UUT-UC and 75 patients (11.3%) presented with both previous and current bladder cancer (BC). The patients with associated BC had more tumors located in the ureter, as well as more multiple locations in the upper urinary tract (p &lt; 0.0001). Nevertheless, the presence of UUT-UC with no previous or synchronous BC did not significantly affect the specific cancer survival rates after nephroure- tectomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>The early post-operative instillation of Mitomycin C (IPOP) after trans-urethral bladder resection is a treat- ment that has been validated for the management of non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), that could decrease the risk of tumor recurrence by 12% to 39%, whether the lesion is uni or multi-focal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref17">17</xref>] . A randomized study by O’Brien et al. suggested evaluating the usefulness of Mitomycin C instillation, in a series of 284 patients, on the very same day as the removal of the bladder catheter after NUT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref18">18</xref>] . The rate of tumor recurrence reported was substantially lower in the group of treated patients, compared with the group of monitored patients (17% vs. 27%, p = 0.055). These authors suggested that an instillation of IPOP would be required for an average of 10 patients in order to avoid a bladder recurrence during the standard follow-up of a UUT-UC. Subsequently, the results of this study allowed to recently modify the guidelines of the European Association of Urology by recommending an early instillation of Mitomycin C after NUT for UUT-UC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref19">19</xref>] . In our retrospective study, no patient benefited from an early instillation of Mitomycin C as our database was established prior to the 2013 recommendations.</p><p>In contrast, a number of prospective studies showed the superiority of fluorescence by blue-light-illuminated cystoscopy compared with standard cystoscopy concerning the detection of NMIBC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref20">20</xref>] . More recently, Burger’s meta-analysis (8 studies with a total of 2160 patients) confirmed that cystoscopy with blue light illumination using hexamino-levulinic acid (Hexvix<sup>&#174;</sup>) would first allow a better diagnosis of the different NMIBC (pTa, pT1 grades and above all carcinoma in situ (CIS)) and would also decrease by 24% the risk of bladder recurrence after 12 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref21">21</xref>] . In the literature, the rate of bladder tumor recurrence after NUT has often been under-esti- mated. According to the authors, a better endoscopic evaluation of the bladder seems to be necessary at diagnosis and during the follow-up of UUT-UC. Also, as previously described, including IPOP in the management of these tumors is certainly very interesting, however the use of blue-light-illuminated cystoscopy appears essential for high grade tumors to detect associated CIS.</p><p>It is important to remember that the survival of a UUT-UC after NUT decreases when there is a bladder tumor recurrence: In fact, the specific survival rate seems to be linked with the characteristics of the bladder recurrence, the infiltrating character of the bladder tumor being a negative factor. Rink et al. evaluated the survival after a UUT-UC recurrence treated by NUT in 596 patients: the average time between tumor recurrence and death was 10 months (80% of the patients died within the 2 years following the diagnosis of bladder tumor recurrence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53643-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>A new medical treatment approach is required in order to improve the detection of bladder recurrence and the survival rate specific to the UUT-UC after NUT. Immediate post-operative instillation in the bladder after NUT has been recently recommended by the European Association of Urology.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to Richard Medeiros, Medical Editor of Medical Editing International for his valuable editing of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>None.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.53643-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J. and Thun, M.J. (2009) Cancer Statistics, 2009. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59, 225-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.20006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roupret, M., Wallerand, H., Traxer, O., Roy, C., Mazerolles, C., Saint, F., et al. (2010) Check up and Management of Upper Urinary Tract Tumors in 2010: An Update from the Committee of Cancer from the French National Association of Urology. Progres en Urologie, 20, 260-271.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pfister, C., Roupret, M., Wallerand, H., Davin, J.L., Quintens, H., Guy, L., et al., Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology (CCAFU) (2010) Recommendations Onco-Urology 2010: Urothelial Tumors. Progres en Urologie, 20, S255-S274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1166-7087(10)70043-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Messing, E.M. and Catalona, W. (1998) Urothelial Tumors of the Urinary Tract. In: Walsh, P.C., Retik, A.B., Vaughan, E.D. and Wein, A.J., Eds., Campbell’s Urology, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 2327-2410.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mullerad, M., Russo, P., Golijanin, D., Chen, H.N., Tsai, H.H., Donat, S.M., et al. (2004) Bladder Cancer as a Prognostic Factor for Upper Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Urology, 172, 2177-2181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirkali, Z. (2003) Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Ureter and Renal Pelvis. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 47, 155-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(03)00079-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hisataki, T., Miyao, N., Masumori, N., Takahashi, A., Sasai, M., Yanase, M., et al. (2000) Risk Factors for the Development of Bladder Cancer after Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer. Urology, 55, 663-667. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00563-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kang, C.H., Yu, T.J., Hsieh, H.H., Yang, J.W., Shu, K., Huang, C.C., et al. (2003) The Development of Bladder Tumors and Contralateral Upper Urinary Tract Tumors after Primary Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract. Cancer, 98, 1620-1626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11691</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lughezzani, G., Burger, M., Margulis, V., Matin, S.F., Novara, G., Roupret, M., et al. (2012) Prognostic Factors in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature. European Urology, 62, 100-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terakawa, T., Miyake, H., Muramaki, M., Takenaka, A., Hara, I. and Fujisawa, M. (2008) Risk Factors for Intravesical Recurrence after Surgical Management of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract. Urology, 71, 123-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milojevic, B., Djokic, M., Sipetic-Grujicic, S., Milenkovic-Petronic, D., Vuksanovic, A., Dragicevic, D., et al. (2011) Bladder Cancer after Managing Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma: Risk Factors and Survival. International Urology and Nephrology, 43, 729-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-9902-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, W.W., Huang, H.Y., Liao, A.C., Shiue, Y.L., Tai, H.L., Lin, C.M., et al. (2009) Primary Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Tract: Important Clinicopathological Factors Predicting Bladder Recurrence after Surgical Resection. Pathology International, 59, 642-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02420.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zigeuner, R.E., Hutterer, G., Chromecki, T., Rehak, P. and Langner, C. (2006) Bladder Tumour Development after Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract Is Related to Primary Tumour Location. BJU International, 98, 1181-1186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06519.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirano, D., Okada, Y., Nagane, Y., Satoh, K., Mochida, J., Yamanaka, Y., et al. (2012) Intravesical Recurrence after Surgical Management of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract. Urology International, 89, 71-77. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000338644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xylinas, E., Colin, P., Audenet, F., Phe, V., Cormier, L., Cussenot, O., et al. (2013) Intravesical Recurrence after Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: Predictors and Impact on Subsequent Oncological Outcomes from a National Multicenter Study. World Journal of Urology, 31, 61-68. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0957-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pignot, G., Colin, P., Zerbib, M., Audenet, F., Soulie, M., Hurel, S., et al. (2013) For the French Collaboration National Database on UUT-UC. World Journal of Urology.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sylvester, R.J., Oosterlinck, W. and van der Meijden, A.P. (2004) A Single Immediate Postoperative Instillation of Chemotherapy Decreases the Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Stage Ta T1 Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Results of Randomized Clinical Trials. Journal of Urology, 171, 2186-2190. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000125486.92260.b2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Brien, T., Ray, E., Singh, R., Coker, B. and Beard, R., British Association of Urological Surgeons Section of Oncology (2011) Prevention of Bladder Tumours after Nephro-Ureterectomy for Primary Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomised Clinical Trial of a Single Postoperative Intravesical Dose of Mitomycin C (the ODMIT-C Trial). European Urology, 60, 703-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roupret, M., Babjuk, M., Comperat, E., Zigeuner, R., Sylvester, R., Burger, M., et al. (2013) European Guidelines on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: 2013 Update. European Urology, 63, 1059-1071. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fradet, Y., Grossman, H.B., Gomella, L., Lerner, S., Cookson, M., Albala, D., et al., PC B302/01 Study Group (2007) A Comparison of Hexaminolevulinate Fluorescence Cystoscopy and White Light Cystoscopy for the Detection of Carcinoma in Situ in Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Phase III, Multicenter Study. Journal of Urology, 178, 68-73. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burger, M., Grossman, H.B., Droller, M., Schmidbauer, J., Hermann, G., Dragoescu, O., et al. (2013) Photodynamic Diagnosis of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer with Hexaminolevulinate Cystoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Detection and Recurrence Based on Raw Data. European Urology, 2838, 353-359.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53643-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rink, M., Sjoberg, D., Comploj, E., Margulis, V., Xylinas, E. and Lee, R.K. (2012) Risk of Cancer-Specific Mortality Following Recurrence after Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19, 4337-4344. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2499-8</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>