<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJFD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3852</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojfd.2014.45035</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJFD-52856</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Improvement of a Propulsion Equipment with a Supersonic Nozzle for Single Pulse Detonation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>azuhiko</surname><given-names>Toshimitsu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shuuto</surname><given-names>Mikajiri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ryo</surname><given-names>Takahashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Mechanical-Environmental System Engineering Major, Oita National College of Technology, Oita, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oita National College of Technology, Oita, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Computer Science and System Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>tosimitu@oita-ct.ac.jp(AT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>447</fpage><lpage>453</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A pulse detonation engine (PDE) is one of candidates of aerospace engines for supersonic cruse. In the paper, a supersonic nozzle ejector is designed to increase thrust of single pulse detonation for methane-oxygen and hydrogen-oxygen mixtures. The design method is based on the conventional characteristic method and inlet condition is averaged value of detonations of methane-oxygen and hydrogen-oxygen mixtures. Comparison of thrusts with a design nozzle and no nozzle (straight- type) is conducted to ensure the designed nozzle performance. Furthermore, the flow velocity, temperature and velocity of the designed nozzle are calculated to ensure its appropriateness with the commercial software ANSYS CFX. Consequently, we succeed in increasing the thrusts of the single pulse detonation with the nozzle, which are 1.4 and 2.0 times as large as ones of straight- type for methane-oxygen and hydrogen-oxygen mixtures respectively.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Thruster</kwd><kwd> Detonation</kwd><kwd> Impulse</kwd><kwd> Supersonic Flow</kwd><kwd> Method of Characteristics</kwd><kwd> CFD</kwd><kwd> Nozzle</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The increase thrust performance for a space-plane and a rocket is important. In particular, the development of high-efficiency propulsion is required in supersonic cruising. According to the background, a pulse detonation engine (PDE) was proposed on 1990s, and PDE has been studied in many institutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52856-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52856-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Our final goal is to design, manufacture and operate PDE for the space and air-breathing propulsion devices at laboratory level.</p><p>In order to increase the thrust of PDE, we will conduct to design and manufacture an optimum supersonic nozzle, which is based on the characteristics method of the supersonic nozzle for single pulse detonation in the paper. Furthermore, performance of the nozzle ejector is investigated by experiment and CFD analysis to validate appropriateness of the design.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Procedure</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Apparatus</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows a schematic diagram of the entire experimental apparatus. The total length, inner diameter and tube thickness of the detonation tube (DT tube) are 1000 mm, 30 mm and 10 mm, respectively. DT tube is suspended by the two stainless wires of diameter 1 mm, and oscillates freely by single impulsive detonation.</p><p>Its impulse can be calculated from Equation (1) of the ballistic pendulum method proposed by Yatsufusa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52856-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.52856-formula464"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the suspended weight [kg], the maximum displacement from the neutral position [m], the damping coefficient and the oscillation period [s], respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Design of the Axisymmetric Supersonic Nozzle</title><p>An axisymmetric supersonic nozzle is designed through the characteristic method based in Foelsch [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52856-ref4">4</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> schematically illustrates the characteristics method for the nozzle. It is assumed that flow is steady and isentropic without boundary layer. The thrust is increased by attaching the nozzle at the outlet of DT tube.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Experimental apparatus to measure thrust on the basis of ballistic pendulum method</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Method of characteristic of axisymmetric supersonic nozzle flow</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x11.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Design Conditions of Nozzle</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the design conditions. Nozzle inlet conditions are the average values of the detonation combustion states of both gas mixtures of H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> for equivalence ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is one. The specific heat ratio of the combustion mixture is assumed as 1.31. Mach number, static pressure and static temperature at the nozzle inlet are 1.7 (700 m/s), 354.6 kPa and 1530 K, respectively. The inlet diameter of the nozzle is 30 mm as same as the inner diameter of the detonation tube. Furthermore, outlet pressure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is set as atmospheric pressure. Other outlet values are automatically determined. Here, the nozzle profile is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. CFD Analysis</title><p>In order to validate the previous design, CFD analysis of the nozzle internal flow is conducted using commercial software ANSYS CFX Ver.14.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the calculation conditions. Turbulent model of the calculation is eddy-viscosity model that includes vortex scale and turbulent intensity are 2.0 mm and 5% respectively.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows computational domain which is consisted of non-structured mesh with 2,701,865 tetrahedron elements and 472,930 nodes.</p><p>The calculated pressure, temperature, velocity distribution are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. It is ensured that the exit velocity and pressure are substantially uniform on the nozzle exit surface. In addition, the boundary layer is not so thick. As the results, we can consider that the nozzle design is appropriate.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental Results</title><p>We will make sure the designed nozzle performance though comparisons of impulse and specific impulse with the nozzle and no nozzle (i.e. exhaust straightly).</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Impulse</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows impulses with nozzle and no nozzle, which are varying the equivalence ratio of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> gas mixture. Since all impulse is constant with varying φ from 0.8 to 1.8. Thus it does not depend on equivalence ratio. The impulses with CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> mixtures with nozzle are about as 1.4 and 2 times as the no nozzle case respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Conditions for characteristic method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Designed supersonic nozzle</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Specific heat ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total pressure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000 kPa</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 K</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Inlet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mach number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354.6 kPa</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1530 K</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter of nozzle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0 mm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross sectional aria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >706.9 mm<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Outlet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mach number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.3 kPa</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400 K</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter of nozzle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.8 mm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross sectional aria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5515.4 mm<sup>2</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Designed supersonic nozzle profile</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x27.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Computational mesh on center plane</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x28.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> CFD analysis results of the supersonic nozzle with pressure, temperature, velocity and velocity on nozzle exit surface</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x29.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Specific Impulse</title><p>The specific impulse <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined by Equation (2). It represents continuous time which thrust can be maintained as 1 N with propellant mass 1 kg.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.52856-formula465"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> mean thrust, impulse and combustible propellant mass, respectively. We should mention that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as fuel only for air-breathing engine or fuel plus oxidizer for rocket engine. The former and latter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are called as “fuel-base” and “mixture-base” specific impulses.</p><p>The experimental specific impulse with varying equivalence ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub><sub> </sub>and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub><sub> </sub>gas mixtures are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0. The fuel-base <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> decreases with increasing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of both mixtures of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>. In particular, specific impulse is large at lean fuel combustion with the nozzle. Namely, the maximum specific impulses of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> are 1463 s at φ = 0.6 and 3096 s at φ = 0.39 respectively. This means that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> correspond to a ramjet engine (500 - 1500 s) and a turbo-jet engine (2300 s - 2900 s), respectively.</p><p>We will discuss about the mixture-base <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for rocket engine as follows. The mixture-base <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> show almost constant value for the equivalence ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (except φ = 0.6 and 2.2), and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with nozzle is about as 1.4 times as one with no nozzle. In particular, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>of no nozzle slightly decreases at φ = 2.2, while <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the nozzle does not decrease. This is concerned about combustion state. Here, we should consider that the range of detonation combustion is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and one of non-detonation combustion is φ = 2.2 with CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>, so that the nozzle can operate as an effective thrust generator for both combustion states.</p><p>The specific impulse of H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> is increased in proportion to equivalent ratio.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of the nozzle, mixture gases and equivalence ratio on impulse</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x48.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of the nozzle and equivalence ratio on fuel-base specific impulse with CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> mixture</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x49.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of the nozzle and equivalence ratio on fuel-base specific impulse with H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> mixture</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x50.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of the nozzle and equivalence ratio on mixture-base specific impulse with CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> mixture</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x51.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Effects of the nozzle and equivalence ratio on mixture-base specific impulse with H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> mixture</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2320174x52.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In the study, we design and manufacture a supersonic nozzle through method of characteristics to increase thrust of single pulse detonation. In order to confirm the effectiveness of the nozzle, we compare the impulse and specific impulse with nozzle and no nozzle (straight exhaust) for methane-oxygen and hydrogen-oxygen gas mixtures through the ballistic pendulum method. The results obtained are as follows.</p><p>• The impulses of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> gas mixtures with the nozzle are about as 1.4 and 2 times as the straight exhaust respectively. Thus, the present design is useful to increase thrust by the detonation.</p><p>• The fuel-base specific impulses of CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> gas mixtures decrease with increasing equivalence ratio. As the result, lean combustion is suitable for large fuel-base specific impulse.</p><p>• The designed nozzle can keep a constant value of the impulse and mixture-base specific impulse in CH<sub>4</sub>-O<sub>2</sub> for detonation and non-detonation combustions. Hence, it is an effective thrust generator for the combustion states.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.52856-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eidelman, S., Grossmann, W. and Lottati, I. (1991) Review of Propulsion Applications and Numerical Simulations of the Pulsed Detonation Engine Concept. Journal of Propulsion, 7, 857-865. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.23402</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52856-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kailasanath, K. (2001) A Review of PDE Research-Performance Estimates. The 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting &amp; Exhibit, AIAA Paper-2001-0474.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52856-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yatsufusa, T., Endo, T. and Taki, S. (2008) Effect of Initiator Conditions on Detonation Initiation and Impulse in Pulse-Detonation Engines. Transactions of Mechanical Engineer, 74, 2055-2062. (In Japanese) http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.74.2055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52856-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crown, B.J.C. (1948) Supersonic Nozzle Design. NACT Technical Note, No. 1651.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>