<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2014.525387</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-52312</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Inductors of Resistance and Their Role in Photosynthesis and Antioxidant System Activity of Coffee Seedlings
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>uiz</surname><given-names>Henrique Monteiro Fernandes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Helbert</surname><given-names>Rezende de Oliveira Silveira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kamila</surname><given-names>Rezende Dázio de Souza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mário</surname><given-names>Lúcio Vilela de Resende</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Donizeti Alves</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Agricultural Reasearch Company of Minas Gerais—EPAMIG, Campus of Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plant Pathology, Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>helbert_rezende@yahoo.com.br(HRDOS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>25</issue><fpage>3710</fpage><lpage>3716</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   We investigated the effects of formulations based on phosphite products on gas exchange and activity of antioxidant enzymes in coffee plants. Seedlings of the Mundo Novo cultivar were submitted to various treatments composed of different formulations of with potassium phosphite (ADB 120), manganese phosphite (Reforce Mn), and fungicide (PrioriXtra<sup>&amp;reg)</sup>. For coffee seedlings, the combination of potassium phosphite and citrus by-products, isolated or in a combination with other products elicited the antioxidant system. Besides the high activity of antioxidant enzymes, the photosynthetic rates were higher than other treatments. The better performance of coffee seedlings treated with those formulations occurred even in absenc
   e of pathogens. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Coffea arabica&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Superoxide Dismutase</kwd><kwd> Ascorbate Peroxidase</kwd><kwd> Catalase</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Coffee production can be affected by biotic and abiotic factors that negatively influence yield and increase production costs. Among these factors there are high temperatures, drought, and diseases, mainly caused by fungi such as coffee rust and brown eyespot diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref1">1</xref>] . Various management techniques such as afforestation, high plant density, and irrigation have been developed to alleviate the problems caused by high temperatures and drought [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref2">2</xref>] . However, the treatment of coffee diseases is more challenging, relying on the application of chemicals, mainly fungicides, of which very few are commercially available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>One potential alternative to fungicides is the use of resistance inductors (elicitors) that respond to biotic and abiotic agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref5">5</xref>] . Resistance inductors include phosphites and formulations based on plant extracts and by-products of plant agroindustries. When applied to plant leaves, phosphites can control diseases by two separate mechanisms: by directly affecting the pathogen and/or by activating the plant defense responses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Plant response against pathogen is related to different physiological mechanisms such as generation of reactive oxygen species generation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref7">7</xref>] , changes in cell wall thickness, deposition of callose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref8">8</xref>] , increase in compounds of secondary metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref10">10</xref>] , and stimulation of networks controlled by plant hormones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Phosphites are inductors of resistance in plants as they stimulate plant mechanisms of defense [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref12">12</xref>] . Those compounds based on phosphites formulations have been used in defense against plant pathogens from genus such as Phytophora, Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Erwinia, Peronospora, Plasmopora [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref13">13</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref15">15</xref>] in different plant species.</p><p>Phosphites application in plants for induction of resistance is related to changes in pectin levels and in activity of enzymes related to the cell wall structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref16">16</xref>] ; increases in activity of enzymes like phenylalanine ammonia- lyase that are involved in cellular defense and increases in synthesis of phenolic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref17">17</xref>] . There is also an increase in reactive species generation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref8">8</xref>] and in the expression of genes related to the production the hormones ethylene, salycilic acid and jasmonic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Many studies have been developed about the processes of resistance induction against pathogens by products based on phosphite formulations. Moreover, the mecanisms of induction of resistance and the changes promoted by phosphites are well known in plants under pathogen infestations. Nevertheless, there is a lack of works describing physiological changes induced by phosphites in plants in the absence of pathogens. In this study, we investigated the effects of formulations based on phosphite products on gas exchange and activity of antioxidant enzymes in coffee plants.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The experiment was performed using 6-month-old seedlings of Coffea arabica L., cultivar Mundo Novo IAC 379-19. The seedlings were maintained in CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations of 405.51 &#177; 2.53 VPM (volume per million) and 60% humidity. The treatments were applied by hand sprayer, and gas exchange and harvesting for biochemical analyses were performed 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after spraying (DAS).</p><p>Treatment formulations were composed of isolates or mixtures (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) of manganese phosphate-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and Mn (Reforce Mn; Agrichem<sup>&#174;</sup>), a fungicide (PrioriXtra<sup>&#174;</sup>, which contains cyproconazole and azoxystrobin, Syngenta<sup>&#174;</sup>) and potassium phosphite with citrus pulp residues (ADB 120, Agrichem<sup>&#174;</sup>).</p><p>Ecophysiological evaluations were performed on the third and fourth fully expanded pair of leaves with the LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR, Lincoln, USA). The evaluated parameters were: photosynthetic leaf rate (A), intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (Ci), atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (Ca), stomatal conductance (gs), and transpiration (E). Carboxylation efficiency (CE) and water-use efficiency (WUE) were obtained</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Description of the treatments and doses used in the experiments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Composition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reforce Mn (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese phosphite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PrioriXtra<sup>&#174;</sup> (0.5 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fungicide</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reforce Mn (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) + PrioriXtra<sup>&#174;</sup> (0.5 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese phosphite + Fungicide</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADB 120 (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) + Reforce Mn (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) + PrioriXtra<sup>&#174;</sup> (0.5 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium phosphite plus citrus pulp residues + Manganese phosphite + Fungicide</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADB 120 (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) + PrioriXtra<sup>&#174;</sup> (0.5 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium phosphite plus citrus pulp residues + Fungicide</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADB 120 (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) + Reforce Mn (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium phosphite plus citrus pulp residues + Manganese phosphite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADB 120 (3.0 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium phosphite plus citrus pulp residues</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>from ratios of Ci/Ca and A/E, respectively. All evaluations were performed between 9 and 10 am with an artificial source of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) in a chamber with 1000 &#181;mol photons m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (Blue + Red LED LI-6400-02B, LI-COR, Lincoln, USA).</p><p>The biochemical analyses were performed on the third and fourth fully expanded pair of leaves, which were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in an ultra freezer. For enzyme extraction, an extraction buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM ascorbic acid) was added to 200 mg of the ground sample. The homogenized samples were then centrifuged at 13,000 g at 4˚C for 20 min. Supernatants were collected and used for superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>SOD activity was quantified as the ability to inhibit the photoreduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref20">20</xref>] . CAT activity was evaluated by decreasing absorbance at 240 nm at 28˚C for 3 min [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref21">21</xref>] . APX activity was evaluated as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>A split plot design was used with four replicates and eight treatments with four time-points evaluated (7, 14, 21, and 28 DAS). The experimental unit was composed of four plants. Statistical analyses were performed using the SISVAR program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref23">23</xref>] and the Scott-Knott test (p &lt; 0.05) was used for comparison of means.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>There were no significant differences in photosynthetic rates between treatments during any of the evaluation time-points (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). However, after the second evaluation plants treated with formulations 5, 6, 7 and 8 were characterized by a higher photosynthetic rate. Plants from the other treatments showed lowered levels of photosynthesis after 14 DAS and maintained these lower levels until the final evaluation. There were no significant differences in carboxylation efficiency, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and water usage efficiency.</p><p>In the first week of the experiment, when there were no significant differences in photosynthetic rates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), the temperature was approximately 29.5˚C. Temperature values were constant until 21 DAS, reaching approximately 32.5˚C at 28 DAS. Vapor deficit pressure (VDP) remained constant until 14 DAS, decreasing until 28 DAS. After 14 DAS photosynthetic rates remained constant in plants submitted to the treatments 5, 6, 7, and 8, but decreased in treatments 1, 2, 3, and 4. These results suggest that the most efficient formulations for main- taining photosynthesis in coffee seedlings under variable temperatures were composed of phosphite formulations. Phosphite application in high rates was related to the increase in leaf aerea index and reduction of infestation in soybean plants infected by downy mildew [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>The SOD, CAT, and APX enzymes showed increased activity in the second time-point, decreased in the third and increased again in the final (fourth) time-point (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In the last three evaluations, enzyme activities</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Net photosynthetic rate (A) of coffee seedlings at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after spraying (DAS) with by-product of citrus agroindustry and potassium phosphite (ADB 120), manganese phosphite (Reforce Mn), and fungicide (Priori Xtra<sup>&#174;</sup>), individually or combined. The upper case letters are comparing treatments within time-point, whereas lower case letters are comparing treatments among all time-points (Scott-Knott test at 5% probability)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2601795x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Activity of superoxide dismutase [SOD (a)], catalase [CAT (b)], and ascorbate peroxidase [APX (c)] of coffee seedlings at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after spraying (DAS) with by-product of citrus agroindustry and potassium phosphite (ADB 120), manganese phosphite (Reforce Mn), and fungicide (Priori Xtra<sup>&#174;</sup>), individually or combined. The upper case letters are comparing treatments within time-point, whereas lower case letters are comparing treatments among all time-points (Scott-Knott test at 5% probability)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2601795x7.png"/></fig><p>were higher in treatments 5, 6, 7, and 8 than the other treatments.</p><p>Taking into account that citrus by-products have high levels of ascorbate, the influence of this antioxidant molecule on activity of antioxidant enzymes and photosynthesis was investigated. The activation of the antioxidant system in coffee leaves was mainly observed in plants submitted to treatments containing ADB 120, that is a combination between phosphite and citrus by-products, when applied in isolation (treatment 8) or as part of a mixture (treatments 5, 6, and 7). In these plants, oxidative stress intensified by 14 DAS by induction of SOD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)), which confers cellular protection to superoxide (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2601795x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and which generates H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub>. The increase in SOD activity indicates not only an increase in superoxide radicals and oxidative stress, but also the rapid involvement of the enzyme in ROS detoxification.</p><p>In plants that have an efficient antioxidant system, toxic products generated in the cell are rapidly degraded by antioxidant enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref25">25</xref>] . In this work, the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> resulting from the reaction catalyzed by SOD was metabolized by CAT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)) or APX (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)) in a co-regulated system. CAT catalyzes H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O, whereas APX utilizes ascorbic acid as a reducing substrate and donates electrons to eliminate H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Peroxidases are more efficient than catalase in H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> degradation, and function in a way to avoid lipid peroxidation, the main indication of oxidative damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref4">4</xref>] . Phosphite fertilization increased catalase activity in common beans plants in low concentrations and reduced this activity under higher concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref26">26</xref>] . In maize, phosphites stimulated eliciting biochemical responses by increasing guaiacol peroxidase activity and lignin biosynthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref27">27</xref>] . In strawberry phosphites were related to higher fruit quality and stimulation of defense mechanisms by increasing anthocyanin production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>The coordinated action between the three enzymes observed in the plants submitted to the treatments 5, 6, 7, and 8, was essential to maintain cellular homeostasis by mitigating the damage caused by ROS. Thus, the success of the citrus by-products in resistance induction during stressful conditions can be explained, at least in part, by their ability to activate the antioxidant system of plants. In addition to antioxidant enzymes, plants have other antioxidant metabolites, such as ascorbate, which removes cytotoxic oxi-radicals and prevents damages caused by the effects of ROS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52312-ref29">29</xref>] . In this work, the combination of potassium phosphite and citrus by-products was an external source of ascorbate, acting either directly or as a substrate for APX. In the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, the ascorbate is regenerated through the action of successive enzymes.</p><p>For coffee seedlings, the combination of potassium phosphite and citrus by products, isolated or in a combination with other products elicited the antioxidant system. Besides the high activity of antioxidant enzymes, the photosynthetic rates were higher than other treatments. The better performance of coffee seedlings treated with those formulations occurred even in absence of pathogens. In this way, the combination of potassium phosphite and citrus by products can be used to enhance the tolerance of coffee plants to pathogens.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Coffee seedlings sprayed with potassium phosphite combined with by-product of citrus agroindustry (isolated or combined with other products) higher antioxidant enzymatic activities and maintained photosynthetic rates even in the absence of pathogens.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We give thanks to the Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&#237;vel Superior (CAPES), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tecnol&#243;gico (CNPq) for the granting of scholarships and to Instituto Brasileiro de Ci&#234;ncia e Tecnologia do Caf&#233; (INCT Caf&#233;) by the research support.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.52312-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavatte, P.C., Oliveira, A.A.G., Morais, L.E., Martins, S.C.V., Sanglard, L.M.V.P. and DaMatta, F.M. (2012) Could Shading Reduce the Negative Impacts of Drought on Coffee? A Morphophysiological Analysis. Physiologia Plantarum, 144, 111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01525.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Reynol</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>As armas da ciência frente às mudan&amp;ccedilas climáticas na agricultura</article-title><source> Conhecimento &amp; Inova&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 44</fpage>-<lpage>45</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barros, F.C., Sagata, E., Ferreira, L.C.C. and Juliatti, F.C. (2010) Indu&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de resistência em plantas contra fitopatógenos. Bioscience Journal, 26, 231-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torres, M.A., Jones, J.D.G. and Dangl, J.L. (2006) Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling in Response to Pathogens. Plant Physiology, 141, 373-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.079467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stangarlin, J.R., Kuhn, O.J., Toledo, M.V., Portz, R.L., Schwan-Estrada, K.R.F. and Pascholati, S.F. (2011) A defesa vegetal contra fitopatógenos. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis, 10,18-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nojosa, G.B.A., Resende, M.L.V., Barguil, B.M., Moraes, S.R.G. and Boas, C.H.V. (2009) Efeito de indutores de resistência em cafeeiro contra a mancha de Phoma. Summa Phytopathologica, 35, 60-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-54052009000100011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baxter, A., Mittler, R. and Suzuki, N. (2014) ROS as Key Players in Plant Stress Signaling. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65, 1229-1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert375</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daniel, R. and Guest, D. (2006) Defense Responses Induced by Potassium Phosphonate in Phytophthora palmivora Challenged Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathogen, 67, 194-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahuja, I., Kissen, R. and Bones, A.M. (2012) Phytoalexins in Defense against Pathogens. Trends in Plant Science, 17, 73-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miralpeix, B., Rischer, H., Hakkinen, S.T., Ritala, A., Seppanen-Laakso, T. Oksman-Caldentey, K., Capell, T. and Christou, P. (2013) Metabolic Engineering of Plant Secondary Products: Which Way Forward? Current Pharmaceutical Design, 19, 5622-5639. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612811319310016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robert-Seilaniantz, A., Grant, M. and Jones, J.D.G. (2011) Hormone Crosstalk in Plant Disease and Defense: More than Just Jasmonate-Salicylate Antagonism. Annual Review in Plant Pathology, 49, 317-343.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panicker, S. and Gangadharan, K. (1999) Controlling Downy Mildew of Maize Caused by Peronosclerospora sorghi by Foliar Sprays of Phosphonic Acid Compounds. Crop Protection, 18, 115-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(98)00101-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bécot, S., Pajot, E., Le Corre, D., Monot, C. and Silué, D. (2000) Phytogard (K2HPO3) Induces Localized Resistance in Cauliflower to Downy Mildew of Crucifers. Crop Protection, 19, 417-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00034-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lobato, M.C., Olivieri, F.P., Daleo, G.R. and Andreu, A.B. (2010) Antimicrobial Activity of Phosphites againt Different Potato Pathogens. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 117, 102-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinto, K.M.S., Nascimento, L.C., Gomes, E.C.S., Silva, H.F. and Miranda, J.R. (2012) Efficiency of Resistance Elicitors in the Management of Grape Vine Downy Mildew Plasmopora viticola: Epidemiological, Biochemical and Economic Aspects. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 134, 745-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-0050-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olivieri, F.P., Feldman, M.L., Machinandiarena, M.F., Lobato, M.C., Caldiz, D.O., Daleo, G.R. and Andreu, A.B. (2012) Phosphite Applications Induce Molecular Modifications in Potato Tuber Periderm and Cortex That Enhance Resistance to Pathogens. Crop Protection, 32, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.08.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jackson, T.J., Burgess, T., Colquhoun, I. and Hardya, G.E.StJ. (2000) Action of the Fungicide Phosphite on Eucalyptus marginata Inoculated with Phytophora cinnamomi. Plant Pathology, 49, 147-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00422.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eshraghi, L., Anderson, J., Aryamanesh, N., Shearer, B., McComb, J., Hardy, G.E.StJ. and O’Brien, P.A. (2011) Phosphite Primed Defence Responses and Enhanced Expression of Defence Genes in Arabidopsis thaliana Infected with Phytophora cinnamomi. Plant Pathology, 60, 1086-1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02471.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biemelt, S., Keetman, U. and Albrecht, G. (1998) Re-Aeration Following Hypoxia or Anoxia Leads to Activation of the Antioxidative Defense System in Roots of Wheat Seedlings. Plant Physiology, 116, 651-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.2.651</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giannopolitis, C.N. and Ries, S.K. (1997) Superoxide Dismutase I. Occurrence in Higher Plants. Plant Physiology, 59, 309-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.59.2.309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Havir, E.A. and McHale, N.A. (1987) Biochemical and Developmental Characterization of Multiple Forms of Catalase in Tobacco Leaves. Plant Physiology, 84, 450-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.84.2.450</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakano, Y. and Asada, K. (1981) Hydrogen Peroxide Is Scavenged by Ascorbate-Specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22, 867-880.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names> D.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Sisvar: A Computer Statistical Analysis System</article-title><source> Ciência e Agrotecnologia</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 1039</fpage>-<lpage>1042</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, O.C., Santos, H.A.A., Dalla Pria, M. and May-De Mio, L.L. (2011) Potassium Phosphite for Control of Downy Mildew of Soybean. Crop Protection, 30, 598-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.02.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blokhina, O. and Fagerstedt, K.V. (2010) Oxidative Metabolism, ROS and NO under Oxygen Deprivation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 359-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avila, F.W., Faquin, V., da Silva Lobato, A.K., Avila, P.A., Marques, D.J., Silva Guedes, E.M. and Tan, D.K.Y. (2013) Effect of Phosphite Supply in Nutrient Solution on Yield, Phosphorus Nutrition and Enzymatic Behavior in Common Bean (“Phaseolus vulgaris” L.) Plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7, 713-722.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avila, F.W., Faquin, V., Araujo, J.L., Marques, D.J., Junior, P.M.R., da Silva Lobato, A.K., Ramos, S.J. and Baliza, D.P. (2011) Phosphite Supply Affects Phosphorus Nutrition and Biochemical Responses in Maize Plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 646-653.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Estrada-Ortiz, E., Trejo-Téllez, L.I., Gómez-Merino, F.C., Nú&amp;ntildeez-Escobar, R. and Sandoval-Villa, M. (2013) The Effects of Phosphite on Strawberry Yield and Fruit Quality. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 13, 612-620.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52312-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deuner, S., Alves, J.D., Zanandrea, I., Goulart, P.F.P., Silveira, N.M., Henrique, P.C. and Mesquita, A.C. (2011) Stomatal Behavior and Components of the Antioxidative System in Coffee Plants under Water Stress. Scientia Agricola, 68, 77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162011000100012</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>