<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Analytical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8251</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajac.2014.517127</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC-52237</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Molybdenum Phosphide Flakes Catalyze Hydrogen Generation in Acidic and Basic Solutions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hongzhong</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cuncai</surname><given-names>Lv</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhibo</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lihuang</surname><given-names>Jin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jie</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhipeng</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>China-Australia Joint Research Center for Functional Molecular Materials, Scientific Research Academy, Jiangsu University, Jiangsu, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>zphuang@ujs.edu.cn(ZH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>17</issue><fpage>1200</fpage><lpage>1213</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Molybdenum phosphide (MoP) flakes were synthesized by the reduction of hexaammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate. The flakes are porous and constructed by MoP nanoparticles with 
  ca. 100 nm diameters. The lateral size of flakes ranges from less than 1 μm to larger than 5 μm, and the thickness of MoP fakes is 
  ca. 200 nm. The mixture of MoP flakes and carbon black exhibits effective catalytic activity in the hydrogen evolution reaction. The optimal overpotential required for 20 mA&#183;cm
  <sup>﹣2</sup> current density is 155 mV in acidic solution and 184 mV in basic solution. The mixture can work stably in long-term hydrogen generation in both acidic and basic solution. The faradaic yield of mixture in hydrogen evolution reaction is nearly 100% in both acidic and basic solution. The Mo and P species in MoP flakes are found to have small positive and negative charge, respectively. The catalytic activity of MoP flakes is likely to be correlated with this charged nature.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Molybdenum Phosphide</kwd><kwd> Hydrogen Evolution Reaction</kwd><kwd> Catalyst</kwd><kwd> Electrolysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>As a clean and renewable resource, hydrogen is believed to be one of the most promising alternative energy carriers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref2">2</xref>] . Hydrogen can be generated by electrolysis or photoelectrolysis of water via the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Effective electrocatalysts for HER are essential for efficient hydrogen generation from electrolysis and photoelectrolysis. Though platinum-group metals have shown excellent catalytic activity in HER, their widespread commercial application is inhibited by high cost and low abundance. The exploitation of effective and low-cost HER catalysts is therefore highly desirable.</p><p>Recently, the development of cost-effective HER catalysts has gained extensive attention. Great efforts have has been devoted to explore HER catalysts among transition metal chalcogenides (e.g., molybdenum sulfide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref7">7</xref>] , tungsten sulfide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref9">9</xref>] , cobalt dichalcogenide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>] , iron dichalcogenide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>] , and nickel dichalcogenide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>] ), carbides (e.g., molybdenum carbide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref14">14</xref>] , and tungsten carbide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref16">16</xref>] ), as well as nitrides and carbonitrides (e.g., molybdenum nitride [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref13">13</xref>] , cobalt-molybdenum nitride [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref17">17</xref>] , tungsten carbonitride [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref18">18</xref>] ). On the other hand, nickel phosphide has been predicted to be an excellent catalyst in HER in 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref19">19</xref>] , whereas the catalytic activity of nickel phosphide (Ni<sub>2</sub>P nanoparticles) was experimentally confirmed in 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref20">20</xref>] . The successful demonstration of catalytic activity of Ni<sub>2</sub>P inspires research concerning the application of metal phosphide in hydrogen generation (e.g., Ni<sub>12</sub>P<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref21">21</xref>] , and CoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref23">23</xref>] ).</p><p>Herein the catalytic activity of MoP flakes in HER is demonstrated. We found that MoP flakes show efficient catalytic activity in HER in both acidic and basic solution, and the corresponding overpotential required for 20 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> current density is 155 mV in acidic solution and 184 mV in basic solution, respectively. The performance is favorably comparable to most values of reported nonprecious metal catalysts. Potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation experiments demonstrate the long-term stability of MoP flakes in hydrogen generation in acidic and basic solution. The influence of synthesis temperature on catalytic activity of MoP flakes was revealed. Tafel slope suggests that the HER occuring on the surface of MoP flakes proceeds along Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism. Mo and P in MoP flakes were found to have slight charge, and the catalytic activity of MoP might be correlated with these features.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Synthesis of MoP Flakes</title><p>Hexaammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate ((NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>6</sub>Mo<sub>7</sub>O<sub>24</sub>∙4H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.9 g) and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (NH<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 0.586 g) were dissolved in 100 mL deionized water, and the mixture was stirred at 90˚C to evaporate all deionized water. The resulting dried powder was grinded in a mortar mixer, and then loaded in a quartz tube mounted in a tube furnace. The quartz tube was pumped to 20 Pa and filled with 5% H<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>. This procedure was repeated five times prior to heating to remove oxygen in the tube. After that, the temperature was increased to 800˚C (heating rate: 3˚C∙min<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>), and maintained at 800˚C for 120 min. During heating, the quartz tube was flowed with 5% H<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> (flow rate: 100 sccm). After the reaction, the furnace was cooled naturally to room temperature.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Characterization</title><p>The structure of MoP flakes was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 &#197;). The morphology of MoP flake was revealed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). TEM and SEM experiments were carried out on a JEM2100 (JEOL) and a JSM7001F (JEOL), respectively. The EDX spectra were recorded using an Oxford Instruments’ INCA system equipped on the JSM7001F. For the TEM investigation, MoP flakes<sub> </sub>were dispersed in ethanol and then loaded onto a carbon-coated copper grid (300-mesh) by drop-coating. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments were carried out on an ESCALAB- 250Xi System (ThermoFisher) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) source and a concentric hemispherical energy analyzer.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Electrochemical Measurement</title><p>All electrochemical measurements were carried out on a CHI 614D electrochemical workstation (CH Instrument) in a three-electrode electrochemical cell. A graphite rod (6 mm diameter) was used as counter electrode, and the counter electrode was separated from working chamber by porous glass frit. A mercury/mercurous sulfate electrode (MSE) or mercury/mercury oxide electrode (MMO) was used as reference electrode. The catalyst (4 mg), certain amount of carbon black (0, 2, 4, or 6 mg), and Nafion solution (5 wt%, 80 μL) were dispersed in 1 ml of water/ethanol (4/1, v/v) by ultrasonication (ultrasonic probe, 2 mm diameter, 130 W, 1 h) to form homogeneous ink. Then different amounts of catalyst ink were loaded onto a glassy carbon electrode (3 mm diameter).</p><p>All solutions were purged with high purity H<sub>2</sub> (99.999%) for 30 min prior to electrochemical measurements and during electrochemical measurements. The experiments carried out in H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution (0.5 M) used the MSE as reference electrode, and those in KOH (1 M) solution used the MMO. The reversible hydrogen evolution potential (RHE) was determined by the open circuit potential of a clean Pt electrode in the solution of interest bubbled with H<sub>2</sub> (99.999%), being −0.694 V vs MSE for 0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution and −0.876 V vs MMO for 1 M KOH solution.</p><p>Polarization curves were measured at a sweep rate of 5 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup> in rigorously stirred solution (1600 rpm). The uncompensated cell resistance (R) was determined by the current-interrupt method. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) sweep was carried out 50 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup> sweep rate. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out at different potentials in the frequency range 10<sup>−2</sup> to 10<sup>6</sup> Hz with 10 mV sinusoidal perturbations and 12 steps per decade in 0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution.</p><p>The current and charge passing the circuit were measured with the electrochemical workstation and the voltage change of the MPXV7002DP was monitored with a digital multimeter (4 1/2 digits). Prior to experiment, the relationship between volume of gathered gas and the variation of output voltage of the MPXV7002DP (i.e., pressure variation in the gas gathering tube) was calibrated by injecting known amounts of air into the gas gathering tube and recording the variation of output voltage of the MPXV7002DP.</p><p>The volume of H<sub>2</sub> during the potentiostatic electrolysis experiment was monitored by volume displacement method in a configuration shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. A Freescale MPXV7002DP differential pressure transducer was employed to monitor pressure variation in the gas gathering tube, and then the volume of generated H<sub>2</sub> was computed from pressure variation in the gas gathering tube. If the initial height of water in the gas gathering tube before the gas gathering experiment is h<sub>0</sub>, and after the potentiostatic electrolysis experiment the generated gas is gathered into the tube and the final height of water in the gas gathering tube become h<sub>1</sub>, then the volume of generated gas (V) should be<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where s is the inner cross-sectional area of the gas gathering tube.</p><p>At the initial status, the pressure inside the gas gathering tube (P<sub>0</sub>) is P − ρgh<sub>0</sub>, where P is the atmospheric pressure, is the density of water, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The output voltage of the differential pressure transducer would be<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where k is the sensitivity of the differential pressure transducer (1 mV/Pa for a Freescale MPXV7002DP). When the height of water in the gas gathering tube decreases to h<sub>1</sub>, the pressure inside the gas gathering tube becomes P<sub>1</sub>, and P<sub>1</sub> = P − ρgh<sub>1</sub>. Then, the output of the differential pressure transducer is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Accordingly, the volume of generated gas can be computed by</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where C is a coefficient that can be calibrated by injecting a known volume of gas into the gas gathering tube and recording the variation of output voltage of the differential pressure transducer.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>MoP was synthesized by the reduction of hexaammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate ((NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>6</sub>Mo<sub>7</sub>O<sub>24</sub>∙4H<sub>2</sub>O) and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (NH<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>) at 800˚C. The XRD pattern of product <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) exhibits</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Illustration of the setup used to monitor the volume of generated gas</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> (a) XRD pattern of MoP. (b) Low and (c) high magnifi- cation SEM images of MoP flake. (d) TEM image of MoP flake. (e) HRTEM image of MoP flake</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x11.png"/></fig><p>distinct peaks, and these peaks can be assigned to those of hexagonal phase MoP (JCPDS No. 65-6487, a = 3.223 &#197;, c = 3.191 &#197;). These distinct peaks suggest the good crystallinity of MoP. The composition information of product was accessed by EDX analysis carried out in SEM. The average atomic ratio of Mo to P recorded from five different sites is 0.976 &#177; 0.053 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), in accordance with that of stoichiometrical MoP (1:1).</p><p>Typical morphology of MoP was investigated by SEM and TEM. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) shows the low magnification SEM image of MoP, revealing a flake like morphology. The lateral size of MoP flakes ranges from less than 1μm to larger than 5 μm, and the thickness of MoP fakes is ca. 200 nm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)). It is further revealed that the MoP flakes are porous and constructed by MoP nanoparticles with diameter ca. 100 nm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image suggests that these small MoP nanoparticles are single crystalline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e)). The good crystallinity of the MoP nanoparticles can be suggested by the well defined lattice fringes. The distances between fringes are measured to be 2.8 and 3.2 &#197;, respectively, corresponding well to those between the (100) and (00-1) planes of hexagonal phase MoP. The pattern resulted from fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the lattice fringes is shown in the inset of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e), matching well that of the (010) zone axis diffraction pattern of hexagonal phase MoP.</p><p>The MoP flakes exhibit effective catalytic activity in HER. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) experiments were carried out to obtain polarization curves of MoP flakes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the optimal performance of MoP flake loaded on glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with and without addition carbon black (Vulcan XC-72R). For comparison, the polarization curves of bare GCE and GCE loaded with carbon black (C on GCE) are also shown. It is found that in acidic solution (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 0.5 M) overpotential required for current density of 10 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> (η<sub>10</sub>)</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Typical EDX spectrum recorded from MoP in SEM</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Polarization curves of MoP/C on GCE (loading amount: 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of MoP and 0.7125 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of C), MoP on GCE (loading amount: 0.855 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>), C on GCE (loading amount: 0.7125 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>), and bare GCE. Potentials are corrected with iR drop</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x13.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Atomic ratio of Mo to P determined by EDX experiments in SEM</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo:P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.958</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.976 &#177; 0.053</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>for MoP on GCE is ca. 423 mV, while η<sub>10</sub> is markedly reduced to 141 mV and η<sub>20</sub> (overpotential required for current density of 20 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup>) is as small as 155 mV for the hybrid materials of MoP flakes and carbon black (MoP/C on GCE). The current density of carbon black on GCE (C on GCE) is smaller than that of MoP on GCE, and bare GCE shows neglectable current density in the potential range of −0.5 - 0 V vs RHE, suggesting that the current in MoP/C on GCE sample can be associated with MoP flakes. The small current density in MoP on GCE sample might be correlated with slow electron transport between less-conducting MoP flakes. The introduction of carbon black enables rapid electron transport from electrode to MoP flakes at catalyst/electrolyte interface, and results in markedly enhanced hydrogen generation performance.</p><p>The η<sub>10</sub> and η<sub>20</sub> are usually adopted as key parameters for the comparison of the catalytic activity of different HER catalysts, because the typical current density of photoelectrochemical water splitting cell ranges in 10 - 20 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> under the solar photon flux of 1 Sun AM 1.5 illumination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref24">24</xref>] . Typical η<sub>10</sub> and η<sub>20</sub> of nonprecious HER catalysts are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. It is shown that the optimal η<sub>10</sub> and η<sub>20</sub> of MoP/C on GCE are favorably comparable to most values of reported nonprecious metal HER catalyst.</p><p>The HER performance depends heavily on the loading amount of MoP flake and carbon black. A series of</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of HER performance of representative catalysts</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Catalyst</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass density (mg/cm<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η<sub>10</sub><sup>b</sup> (mV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η<sub>20</sub><sup>c</sup> (mV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Electrolyte</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amorphous MoS<sub>3</sub>-CV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref7">7</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WS<sub>2</sub> nanosheets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WS<sub>2</sub> nanosheets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref9">9</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001 - 0.0002 or ca. one continuous layer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FeSe<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>0.43</sub>Co<sub>0.57</sub>S<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoSe<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co<sub>0.56</sub>Ni<sub>0.44</sub>Se<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co<sub>0.32</sub>Ni<sub>0.68</sub>S<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NiS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NiSe<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulk Mo <sub>2</sub>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon paste electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulk MoB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon paste electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo<sub>1</sub>Soy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo<sub>1</sub>Soy-RGO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo <sub>2</sub>C /C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo <sub>2</sub>C /CNT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref14">14</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe-WCN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RRDE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (pH 1) + Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> ( 0.5 M )</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co<sub>0.6</sub>Mo<sub>1.4</sub>N<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref17">17</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FeS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref18">18</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>2</sub>P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>12</sub>P<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref21">21</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoP/CNT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref22">22</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref23">23</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >carbon cloth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni-Mo nanopowder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref31">31</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 M NaOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni-Mo nanopowder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref31">31</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni-Mo nanopowder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref31">31</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M NaOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>3</sub>(33%)/MWCNT-NC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref32">32</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silver electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Core-shell MoO<sub>3</sub>-MoS<sub>2</sub> nanowires [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >272</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Defect-rich MoS<sub>2</sub> nanosheets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub>@Au [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub>/RGO hybrid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref36">36</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub>/MGF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref37">37</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass carbon disk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu<sub>2</sub>MoS<sub>4</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH 0 H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WS<sub>2</sub>/RGO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cobalt-sulfide catalyst [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 M pH 7 PBS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NiWS<sub>x</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH 7 PBS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoWS<sub>x</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH 7 PBS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoMoS<sub>x</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH 7 PBS</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>h<sub>10</sub>: overpotential required for 10 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> current density; <sup>b</sup>h<sub>20</sub>: overpotential required for 20 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> current density.</p><p>LSV experiments were carried out to determine the optimal performance of MoP flake. These results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. The η<sub>10</sub> of MoP on GCE sample firstly increases with the loading amount of MoP, with the optimal loading amount of 0.855 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>, and further increase the loading amount of MoP results in the decreasing of η<sub>10</sub>. The relationships between η<sub>20</sub> and the loading amount of MoP in MoP/C on GCE samples with different weight ratios of MoP to C are summarized (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)), and the corresponding polarization curves are shown in panels c-e of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. It is shown that the smallest η<sub>20</sub> can be found in MoP/C on GCE with the weight</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Polarization curves of GCE loaded with different amount of MoP flake. (b) The relationship between h<sub>20</sub> and loading amount of MoP in MoP/C on GCE. Different weight ratios of MoP to C have been evaluated to find the optimal h<sub>20</sub>. The polarization curves of MoP/C on GCE for different weight ratio of MoP to C: (c) 2/1, (d) 1/1, and (e) 2/3. Potentials were corrected with iR drop</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x14.png"/></fig><p>ratio of MoP to C being 2:1 and the loading amount of MoP being 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>.</p><p>The fabrication temperature influences the catalytic activity of MoP flake in HER. MoP flakes were fabricated at different temperatures, and the products are denoted as MoPxxx, where xxx is the fabrication temperature. The plots of h<sub>20</sub> versus the loading amounts of MoP750 and MoP850 are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a), and the polarization curves of MoP750, and MoP850 can be found in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c), respectively. The optimal h<sub>20</sub> is 210 mV for M750 (the loading amount of MoP: 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>) and 190 mV for M850 (the loading amount of MoP: 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>), respectively, both larger than that of MoP800 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The XRD experiments reveal that the structure of M750 and M850 is the same as that of MoP800 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)), and no impurity phase can be detected from the corresponding XRD patterns. The peaks are more distinct for sample obtained at higher temperature, suggesting that higher temperature would be beneficial for the crystallization of MoP flake. The specific surface areas of MoP750, MoP800, and MoP850 were measured by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) method <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b), being 4.798, 4.835, and 3.767 m<sup>2</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The results of XRD and BET experiments suggest that the crystallinity and surface area of MoP flake work cooperatively, resulting in an optimal catalytic activity of sample obtained at 800˚C.</p><p>The faradaic efficiency of MoP flakes in HER was evaluated by the comparison of measured volume and theoretical volume of generated hydrogen. The generated hydrogen was measured by water displacement method, and the theoretical volume was computed by assuming that all elecrons passing through the circuit are consumed by the reduction reaction of H<sup>+</sup> (2H<sup>+</sup> + 2e<sup>−</sup> → H<sub>2</sub>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the plots of measured volume and theoretical volume of hydrogen generated during a potentiostatic electrolysis. The measured volume of hydrogen matches well the theoretical one within experimental error, suggesting that the faradaic efficiency of MoP flakes is nearly 100% in hydrogen generation.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> (a) The relationship between η<sub>20</sub> and loading amount of MoP in MoP/C on GCE for MoP fabricated at different temperatures. Polarization curves of MoP fabricated at (b) 750˚C and (c) 850˚C. The weight ratio of MoP to C is kept as 2:1. Potentials were corrected with iR drop</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x15.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> (a) XRD patterns of products obtained at different temperatures. (b) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm of MoP obtained at different temperatures.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x16.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Plots of theoretical and measured volume of gene- rated hydrogen in a potentiostatic electrolysis experiment. The sample is MoP/C on GCE (loading amount: 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of MoP and 0.7125 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of C), and applied potential is −0.25 V vs RHE (without iR correction)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x17.png"/></fig><p>Long-term stability during hydrogen generation is also important for the practical application of HER catalyst. MoP flake was found to work stably in acidic solution during hydrogen generation, as indicated by potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). A potentiostatic electrolysis experiment shows that only slightly decrease of current density occurs in the first 5000 s, and thereafter the current density is nearly unchanged. An accelerated degradation experiment was carried out by repeated cyclic voltammetry (CV) sweep. Negligible difference can be found between the polarization curves of the initial and 2000th scan. The potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation experiments demonstrate the long-term hydrogen generation capability of MoP flakes.</p><p>To obtain insight into the HER process of MoP flakes, EIS experiments were carried out in acidic solution. The spectra corresponding to different applied potentials are shown in a Nyquist plot in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a). All spectra contain two semicircles, and they can be well fitted with a two-time-constant equivalent circuit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). Charge transfer resistance (R<sub>ct</sub>) at solid/liquid interface was derived from semicircles at low frequencies range. R<sub>ct</sub> is associated with HER kinetics of a catalyst, and a smaller R<sub>ct</sub> suggests faster kinetics. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a) shows that R<sub>ct</sub> decreases with increasing applied potential, in accordance with larger current density at larger applied potential. The applied potentials are plotted versus inverse R<sub>ct</sub> on a logarithmic scale (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(b)), and the Tafel slope was determined by the slope in the plot, being 71.77 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>The HER process can be revealed by Tafel slope. In general, a classic two-electron-reaction model suggests that the HER process can proceed in two steps: a discharge step (Volmer reaction: H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> + e<sup>−</sup> → H<sub>ads</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O) followed by a desorption step (Heyrovsky reaction: H<sub>ads</sub> + H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> + e<sup>−</sup> → H<sub>2</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O), or a discharge step followed by a recombination step (Tafel reaction: H<sub>ads</sub> + H<sub>ads</sub> → H<sub>2</sub>), where H<sub>ads</sub> represents a H atom absorbed at the active site of the catalyst. The rate-limiting step can be identified by Tafel analysis of the catalyst, and a Tafel slope of 116, 38, or 29 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup> assigns the rate-determining step in the HER process to Volmer, Heyrovsky, or Tafel reaction. The Tafel slope of 71.77 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup> lies between 38 and 116 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup>, suggesting that a Volmer- Heyrovsky mechanism might be responsible for the HER process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref13">13</xref>] , and that the rates of the discharge step and the desorption step might be comparable during the HER process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>The chemical states of Mo and P in MoP flake were investigated by XPS experiments to find possible origin of the HER catalytic activity of MoP flake. The corresponding results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2. The XPS spectrum of the Mo 3d window can be fitted to two doublets with peaking energy at 228.3 eV and 232.5 eV, respectively <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2(a). The peak at 228.3 eV can be associated with Mo in MoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref27">27</xref>] , and this binding energy is very close to that of elemental Mo (227.9 eV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref28">28</xref>] , implying that these Mo species have very a small positive charge. On the other hand, the peak at 232.5 eV suggests the presence of Mo<sup>6+</sup> species in product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref27">27</xref>] . Two doublets (129.5 and 133.8 eV) can be found in the P 2p window <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2(b). The doublet at 129.5 eV can be attributed to P bonding to Mo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref27">27</xref>] , and these P species have a slightly negative charge, because their binding energy (129.5 eV) is only 0.5 eV smaller than that of elemental P (130.0 eV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref29">29</xref>] . The doublet at 133.8 eV</p><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship of current density and experimental time in poten- tiostatic experiment (applied potential: −0.15 V vs RHE). Inset shows the polarization curves corresponding to the initial and 2000th scan in CV sweep. The sample is MoP/C on GCE (loading amount: 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of MoP and 0.7125 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of C), and potentials were not corrected with iR drop</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x18.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> (a) Nyquist plot of EIS spectra at different overpotential recorded from MoP/C on GCE sample. (b) Plot of overpotential and inverse R<sub>ct</sub> on a logarithmic scale. The sample is MoP/C on GCE (loading amount: 1.425 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of MoP and 0.7125 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of C), and potentials were not iR corrected</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x19.png"/></fig><p>can be related to P in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref27">27</xref>] . The Mo<sup>6+</sup> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> possibly come from un-reacted precursor or oxidation product of MoP due to air exposure.</p><p>In Mo<sub>2</sub>C and Mo<sub>2</sub>N, Mo was found to have very small positive charge because of charge transfer from Mo to C or N [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref14">14</xref>] . The d band electron structure becomes similar to that of Pt as a result of the charge transfer, and the HER catalytic activity of Mo<sub>2</sub>C and Mo<sub>2</sub>N have been associated with the modified d band structure of Mo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref14">14</xref>] . The XPS spectrum of the Mo 3d window from MoP flakes reveals that Mo species in MoP flakes also have a very small positive charge. In addition, active sites in hydrogenase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref19">19</xref>] , its analogues (Ni(PS3<sup>*</sup>)(CO)]<sup>− </sup>and [Ni(PNP)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref19">19</xref>] and Ni<sub>2</sub>P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref19">19</xref>] contain hydride acceptors (Ni), which have a small positive charge. The charged nature of Mo in MoP resembles that of Mo in Mo<sub>2</sub>C and Mo<sub>2</sub>N, as well as the hydride acceptors in hydrogenase, its analogues, and Ni<sub>2</sub>P, implying that the weakly charged Mo species in MoP might contribute to the catalytic activity of MoP. On the other hand, the proton acceptors are another kind of active sites in hydrogenase,</p><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Equivalent circuit used for fitting of EIS data. R<sub>s</sub> is the overall series resistance, CPE<sub>1</sub> and R<sub>1</sub> are the constant phase element and resistance describing electron transport at MoP/C and GCE interface or between MoP/C, respectively, CPE<sub>dl</sub> is the constant phase element of the MoP/electrolyte interface, and R<sub>ct</sub> is the charge transfer resistance at MoP/electrolyte interface</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x22.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> XPS spectra of (a) Mo 3d window and (b) P 2p window collected from MoP flake</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x23.png"/></fig><p>its analogues, and Ni<sub>2</sub>P. The proton acceptors are nonmetal sites having a small negative charge to trap protons (e.g., O of Glu23 in hydrogenase, −0.44 e; S in Ni(PS3<sup>*</sup>)(CO)]<sup>−</sup>, −0.4 e; N in [Ni(PNP)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, −0.34 e; P in Ni<sub>2</sub>P, −0.07 e) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.52237-ref19">19</xref>] . The P species in MoP flakes are also slightly negatively charged. This charged nature is analogous to that of the proton acceptors in hydrogenase, its analogues, and Ni<sub>2</sub>P. It is reasonable to postulate that the slightly charged P species in MoP work similarly to the proton acceptors in hydrogenase, its analogues, and Ni<sub>2</sub>P, also contributing positively to the catalytic activity of MoP flakes. Therefore, the catalytic activity of MoP flakes is likely to be correlated with the charged natures of Mo and P.</p><p>Finally, the HER performance of MoP flakes in basic solution (KOH, 1M) was evaluated. The results are summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3. The corresponding η<sub>10</sub> and η<sub>20</sub> is 166 and 184 mV, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3(a)). Current density recorded in a potentiostatic electrolysis experiment shows slight decrease in 10000 s, and the increase of η<sub>20</sub> after 2000 scan in repeated CV scans is as small as 14 mV (inset of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3(b)). In addition, the faradaic yield is also nearly 100% within the experimental error (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3(c)). These experiments demonstrate that MoP flake can also work efficiently and stably in basic solution for hydrogen generation.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In summary, MoP flake was found to show efficient and stable catalytic activity in HER in acidic and basic solution. The optimal η<sub>20</sub> of MoP flakes mixed with carbon black is as small as 155 mV in acidic solution and 184 mV in basic solution. The fabrication temperature of MoP flakes was found to influence the catalytic activity of MoP flakes. The samples fabricated at 800˚C showed superior performance to those at 750˚C or 850˚C. The difference of catalytic activities might be associated with the crystallinity and specific surface area of products obtained at different temperatures. Charge transport resistances at the interface of catalyst/electrolyte suggest a Tafel slope of 71.77 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup>, implying that a Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism might be responsible for the HER process on the surface of MoP flakes. Potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation experiments show that MoP flakes can work stably in long-term hydrogen generation in both acidic and basic solution. In</p><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> Evaluation of MoP/C on GCE in basic solution (KOH, 1M). (a) Polarization curve (loading amount: 1.14 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of MoP and 0.57 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup> of C). (b) The relationship of current density and experimental time in potentiostatic experiment (applied potential: −0.18 vs. RHE). Inset shows the polarization curves corresponding to the initial and 1000th scan in CV sweep. (c) The plots of theoretical and measured volume of generated hydrogen in potentiostatic electrolysis experiment (applied potential: −0.28 vs. RHE). Only potentials in (a) were corrected with iR drop</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2201046x24.png"/></fig><p>addition, the faradaic yield of MoP flakes in acidic and basic solution is nearly 100%. XPS experiments reveal that Mo and P in MoP flakes have a slight charge, and the catalytic activity of MoP flakes might be associated with the charged natures of Mo and P.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61006049, 50925207), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2011DFG52970), the Ministry of Education of China (IRT1064), Jiangsu Innovation Research Team, the Education Department of Jiangsu (10KJB430004), Jiangsu Province (2011-XCL-019, and 2013-479), and Jiangsu University (09JDG043 and Outstanding Youth Project).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.52237-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, N.S. and Nocera, D.G. (2006) Powering the Planet: Chemical Challenges in Solar Energy Utilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 15729-15735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603395103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cook, T.R., Dogutan, D.K., Reece, S.Y., Surendranath, Y., Teets, T.S. and Nocera, D.G. (2010) Solar Energy Supply and Storage for the legacy and Nonlegacy Worlds. Chemical Reviews, 110, 6474-6502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr100246c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaramillo, T.F., Jorgensen, K.P., Nielsen, J.H., Horch, S. and Chorkendorff, I. (2007) Identification of Active Edge Sites for Electrochemical H2 Evolution from MoS2 Nanocatalysts. Science, 317, 100-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1141483</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laursen, A.B., Kegnaes, S., Dahl, S. and Chorkendorff, I. (2012) Molybdenum Sulfides-Efficient and Viable Materials for Electro- and Photoelectrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 5, 5577-5591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee02618j</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hinnermann, B., Moses, P.G., Bonde, J., Jorgensen, K.P., Nielsen, J.H., Horch, S., Chorkendorff, I. and Norskov, J.K. (2005) Biomimetic Hydrogen Evolution: MoS2 Nanoparticles as Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 5308-5309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja0504690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merki, D. and Hu, X. L. (2011) Recent Developments of Molybdenum and Tungsten Sulfides as Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 4, 3878-3888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01970h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merki, D., Fierro, S., Vrubel, H. and Hu, X.L. (2011) Amorphous Molybdenum Sulfide Films as Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Production in Water. Chemical Science, 2, 1262-1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1sc00117e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Z.Z., Fang, B.Z., Bonakdarpour, A., Sun, A.K., Wilkinson, D.P. and Wang, D.Z. (2012) WS2 Nanosheets as a Highly Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 125, 59-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Voiry, D., Yamaguchi, H., Li, J.W., Silva, R., Alves, D.C.B., Fujita, T., Chen, M.W., Asefa, T., Shenoy, V.B., Eda, G. and Chhowalla, M. (2013) Enhanced Catalytic Activity in Strained Chemically Exfoliated WS2 Nanosheets for Hydrogen Evolution. Nature Materials, 12, 850-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3700</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ivanovskaya, A., Singh, N., Liu, R.F., Kreutzer, H., Baltrusaitis, J., Nguyen, T.V., Metiu, H. and McFarland, E. (2013) Transition Metal Sulfide Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Hydrobromic Acid Electrolysis. Langmuir, 29, 480-492.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la3032489</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kong, D.S., Cha, J.J., Wang, H.T., Lee, H.R. and Cui, Y. (2013) First-Row Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 6, 3553-3558.http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42413h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vrubel, H. and Hu, X.L. (2012) Molybdenum Boride and Carbide Catalyze Hydrogen Evolution in Both Acidic and Basic Solutions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51, 12703-12706.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.F., Iyer, S., Iyer, S., Sasaki, K., Wang, C.H., Zhu, Y.M., Muckerman, J.T. and Fujita, E. (2013) Biomass-Derived Electrocatalytic Composites for Hydrogen Evolution. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 6, 1818-1826.http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40596f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.F., Wang, C.H., Sasaki, K., Marinkovic, N., Xu, W., Muckerman, J.T., Zhu, Y. and Adzic, R.R. (2013) Highly Active and Durable Nanostructured Molybdenum Carbide Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 6, 943-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee23891h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harnisch, F., Sievers, G. and Schroder, U. (2009) Tungsten Carbide as Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in pH Neutral Electrolyte Solutions. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 89, 455-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y., Kamiya, K., Hashimoto, K. and Nakanishi, S. (2013) Hydrogen Evolution by Tungsten Carbonitride Nanoelectrocatalysts Synthesized by the Formation of a Tungsten Acid/Polymer Hybrid In Situ. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 52, 13638-13641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201307527</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, B.F., Veith, C.M., Neuefeind, J.C., Adzic, R.R. and Khalifah, P.G. (2013) Mixed Close Packed Cobalt Molybdenum Nitrides as Non-Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135, 19186-19192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja4081056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tran, P.D., Chiam, S.Y., Boix, P.P., Ren, Y., Pramana, S.S., Fize, J., Artero, V. and Barber, J. (2013) Novel Cobalt/ Nickel-Tungsten-Sulfide Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Generation from Water. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 6, 2452-2459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40600h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, P. and Rodriguez, J.A. (2005) Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution from the [NiFe] Hydrogenase to the Ni2P(001) Surface: The Importance of Ensemble Effect. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 14871-14878.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja0540019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popczun, E.J., McKone, J.R., Read, C.G., Biacchi, A.J., Wiltrout, A.M., Lewis, N.S. and Schaak, R.E. (2013) Nanostructured Nickel Phosphide as an Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135, 9267-9270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja403440e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Z.P., Chen, Z.B., Chen, Z.Z., Lv, C.C., Meng, H. and Zhang, C. (2014) Ni12P5 Nanoparticles as an Efficient Catalyst for Hydrogen Generation via Electrolysis and Photoelectrolysis. ACS Nano, 8, 8121-8129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn5022204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Q., Tian, J.Q., Cui, W., Jiang, P., Cheng, N.Y., Asiri, A.M. and Sun, X.P. (2014) Carbon Nanotubes Decorated with CoP Nanocrystals: A Highly Active Non-Noble-Metal Nanohybrid Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 53, 6710-6714.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popczun, E.J., Read, C.G., Roske, C.W., Lewis, N.S. and Schaak, R.E. (2014) Highly Active Electrocatalysis of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction by Cobalt Phosphide Nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 53, 5427-5430.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walter, M.G., Warren, E.L., McKone, J.R., Boettcher, S.W., Mi, Q.X., Santori, E.A. and Lewis, N.S. (2010) Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chemical Reviews, 110, 6446-6473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, M.R., Lin, Z.Y., Zhuang, T.T., Jiang, J., Xu, Y.F., Zheng, Y.R. and Yu, S.H. (2012) Mixed-Solution Synthesis of Sea Urchin-Like NiSe Nanofiber Assemblies as Economical Pt-Free Catalysts for Electrochemical H2 Production. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 22, 13662-13668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2jm31916k</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Phillips, D.C., Sawhill, S.J., Self, R. and Bussell, M.E. (2002) Synthesis, Characterization, and Hydrodesulfurization Properties of Silica-Supported Molybdenum Mhosphide Catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 207, 266-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abu, I.I. and Smith, K.J. (2006) The Effect of Cobalt Addition to Bulk MoP and Ni2P Catalysts for the Hydrodesulfurization of 4,6-Dimethyldibenzothiophene. Journal of Catalysis, 241, 356-366.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2006.05.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Powell, C.J. (2012) Recommended Auger Parameters for 42 Elemental Solids. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 185, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2011.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nefedov, V.I., Salyn, Y.V., Domashevskaya, E.P., Ugai, Y.A. and Terekhov, V.A.A. (1975) Study by XPS and XRS of the Participation in Chemical Bonding of the 3d Electrons of Copper, Zinc and Gallium. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 6, 231-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0368-2048(75)80018-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, J.Q., Liu,Q., Asiri, A.M. and Sun, X.P. (2014) Self-Supported Nanoporous Cobalt Phosphide Nanowire Arrays: An Efficient 3D Hydrogen-Evolving Cathode over the Wide Range of pH 0-14. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136, 7587-7590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja503372r</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McKone, J.R., Sadtler, B.F., Werlang, C.A., Lewis, N.S. and Gray, H.B. (2013) Ni-Mo Nanopowders for Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Catalysis, 3, 166-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs300691m</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, T.W., Liu, C.J. and Lin, J.Y. (2013) Facile Synthesis of MoS3/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite with High Catalytic Activity toward Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 134-135, 75-82.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Z., Cummins, D., Reinecke, B.N., Clark, E., Sunkara, M.K. and Jaramillo, T.F. (2011) Core-Shell MoO3-MoS2 Nanowires for Hydrogen Evolution: A Functional Design for Electrocatalytic Materials. Nano Letters, 11, 4168-4175.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl2020476</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xie, J., Zhang, H., Li, S., Wang, R., Sun, X., Zhou, M., Zhou, J., Lou, X.W. and Xie, Y. (2013) Defect-Rich MoS2 Ultrathin Nanosheets with Additional Active Edge Sites for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Advanced Materials, 25, 5807-5813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302685</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, T.Y., Liu, L., Zhu, Z.W., Papakonstantinou, P., Hu, J.B. and Li, M. (2013) Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction from Self-Assembled Mono-dispersed Molybdenum Sulfide Nanoparticles on an Au Electrode. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 6, 625-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee23513g</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y., Wang, H., Xie, L., Liang, Y., Hong, G. and Dai, H. (2011) MoS2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133, 7296-7299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja201269b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liao, L., Zhu, J., Bian, X.J., Zhu, L.N., Scanlon, M.D., Girault, H.H. and Liu, B.H. (2013) MoS2 Formed on Mesoporous Graphene as a Highly Active Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. Advanced Functional Materials, 23, 5326-5333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300318</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yan, Y., Ge, X., Liu, Z., Wang, J.Y., Lee, J.M. and Wang, X. (2013) Facile Synthesis of Low Crystalline MoS2 Nanosheet-Coated CNTs for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nanoscale, 5, 7768-7771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3nr02994h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tran, P.D., Nguyen, M., Pramana, S.S., Bhattacharjee, A., Chiam, S.Y., Fize, J., Field, M.J., Artero, V., Wong, L.H., Loo, J. and Barber, J. (2012) Copper Molybdenum Sulfide: A New Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Production from Water. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 5, 8912-8916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22611a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, J., Voiry, D., Ahn, S.J., Kang, D., Kim, A.Y., Chhowalla, M. and Shin, H.S. (2013) Two-Dimensional Hybrid Nanosheets of Tungsten Disulfide and Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 52, 13751-13754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201307475</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.52237-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, Y., Liu, C., Grauer, D.C., Yano, J., Long, J.R., Yang, P. and Chang, C.J. (2013) Electrodeposited Cobalt-Sulfide Catalyst for Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation from Water. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135, 17699-17702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja4094764</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>