<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMNTA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9479</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijmnta.2014.35024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJMNTA-51435</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Global Attractors of the Solution for 2D Maxwell-Navier-Stokes with Extra Force Equations
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>uicui</surname><given-names>Tian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meixia</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guoguang</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Yunnan University, Kunming, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>gglin@ynu.edu.cn(GL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>11</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>221</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, we studied the solution existence and uniqueness and the attractors of the 2D Maxwell-Navier-Stokes with extra force equations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Maxwell-Navier-Stokes Equations</kwd><kwd> Existence</kwd><kwd> Uniqueness</kwd><kwd> Attractor</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, the Maxwell-Navier-Stokes equations have been studied extensively, and the studies have obtained many achievements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref2">2</xref>] . The Maxwell-Navier-Stokes equations are a coupled system of equations consisting of the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics and Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism. The coupling comes from the Lorentz force in the fluid equation and the electric current in the Maxwell equations. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref1">1</xref>] , the authors studied the non-resistive limit of the 2D Maxwell-Navier-Stokes equations and established the convergence rate of the non-resistive limit for vanishing resistance by using the Fourier localization technique. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref2">2</xref>] , the author has proved the existence and uniqueness of global strong solutions to the non-resistive of the</p><p>2D Maxwell-Navier-Stokes equations for initial data <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The</p><p>long time behaviors of the solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations also are seen in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref3">3</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>In this paper,we will study the 2D Maxwell-Navier-Stokes equations with extra force and dissipation in a bounded area under homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition problems:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula687"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded set, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the bound of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the velocity of the fluid, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the viscosity, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are resistive constants, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the electric current which is given by Ohm’s law, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the electric field, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the magnetic field and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Lorentz force.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The priori estimate of solution of questions (1.1)</title><p>Lemma 1. Assume <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so the solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the Dirichlet</p><p>bound questions (1.1) satisfies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula688"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. For the system (1.1) multiply the first equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula689"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (1.1) multiply the second equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula690"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (1.1) multiply the third equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula691"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Because<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula692"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to Poincare’s inequality, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula693"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula694"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to Young’s inequality, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula695"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula696"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula697"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.4) (2.5) (2.6) (2.7) (2.8) (2.9), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula698"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>so</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula699"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, according that we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula700"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>so</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula701"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the Gronwall’s inequality, the Lemma 1 is proved.</p><p>Lemma 2. Under the condition of Lemma 1, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>so the solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the Dirichlet bound questions (1.1) satisfies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula702"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. For the system (1.1) multiply the first equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula703"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (1.1) multiply the second equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula704"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (1.1) multiply the third equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula705"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and (2.10) (2.11) (2.12) we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula706"><label>(2.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula707"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>so</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula708"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the Sobolev’s interpolation inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula709"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>so</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula710"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula711"><label>(2.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the Sobolev’s interpolation inequalities and Young’s inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula712"><label>(2.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the Holder’s inequalities and inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula713"><label>(2.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula714"><label>(2.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the (2.13) (2.14) (2.15) (2.16) (2.17) (2.18), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula715"><label>(2.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula716"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the Poincare’s inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula717"><label>(2.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the Young’s inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula718"><label>(2.21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In a similar way,we can obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula719"><label>(2.22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula720"><label>(2.23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.19)-(2.23), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula721"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, because<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so existing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfied</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula722"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula723"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the Gronwall’s inequality,we can get the Lemma 2.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Solution’s existence and uniqueness and attractor of questions (1.1)</title><p>Theorem 1. Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so questions (1.1) exist a unique</p><p>solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. By the method of Galerkin and Lemma 1 - Lemma 2, we can easily obtain the existence of solutions. Next, we prove the uniqueness of solutions in detail.</p><p>Assume <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are two solutions of questions (1.1), let</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so the diffe-</p><p>rence of the two solution satisfies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula724"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula725"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The two above formulae subtract and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula726"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (3.1) multiply the first equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula727"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (3.1) multiply the second equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula728"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the system (3.1) multiply the third equation by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with both sides and obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula729"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to (3.2) + (3.3) + (3.4), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula730"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>From that, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula731"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula732"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Notice that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula733"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the (3.5), (3.6), (3.7) and (3.8), we can obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula734"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula735"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>so, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula736"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the consistent Gronwall inequality, the uniqueness is proved.</p><p>Theorem 2. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51435-ref8">8</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a Banach space, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the semigroup operators on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a unit operator. Set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the follow</p><p>conditions.</p><p>1) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is bounded. Namely<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it exists a constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>2) It exists a bounded absorbing set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> namely <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> it exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>3) When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a completely continuous operator<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Therefor, the semigroup operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> exist a compact global attractor.</p><p>Theorem 3. Under the assume of Theorem 1, questions (1.1) have global attractor</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the bounded absorbing set of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and satisfies</p><p>1) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and it is a bounded set, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. Under the conditions of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, it exists the solution semigroup <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of ques-</p><p>tions (1.1), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>From Lemma 1 - Lemma 2, to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a bounded set that includes in the ball</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula737"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula738"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This shows <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly bounded in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Furthermore, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> there is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula739"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51435-formula740"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the bounded absorbing set of semigroup <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is tightly embedded, which is that the bounded set in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the tight set in</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so the semigroup operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2340148x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is completely continuous.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>If we want to estimate the Hausdorff and fractal dimension of the attractor A of question (1.1), we need proof of the solution of question (1.1) that is differentiable. We are studying the solution’s differentiability hardly and positively. Over a time, we will get some results.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowlegements</title><p>This work is supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of People's Republic of China under Grant 11161057.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.51435-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q. (2013) On the Non-Resistive Limit of the 2D Maxwell-Navier-Stokes Equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 404, 150-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masmoudi, N. (2010) Global Well Posedness for the Maxwell-Navier-Stokes System in 2D. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 93, 559-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2009.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tian</surname><given-names> L.X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>Attractor of the Dissipated and Isolated Wave-Equation</article-title><source> Journal of Applied Mathmatics and Mechanics</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 539</fpage>-<lpage>547</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, Z.D., Guo, B.L. and Lin, G.G. (1998) Breakdown Structure of Generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation Attractor. Applied Mathmatics and Mechanics, 19, 243-255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Du, X.Y. and Dai, Z.D. (2000) Global Attractor of Dissipative KDV Equation about Cauchy Problem. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 20, 289-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, B.L. (2000) The Infinite Dimension System. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J.Z., Zhao, P. and Lin, G.G. (2010) An Inertial Manifold of the Damped Boussinesq Equation. Journal of Yunnan University, 32, 310-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, G.G. (2011) Nonlinear Evolution Equations. Yunnan University Press, Kunming.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, L.X. and Ding, D.P. (2000) Local Property or Weakly Damped Forced KDV Equation in 2-D Thin Domin. Journal of Jiangsu University of Sciencend Technology, 21, 106-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51435-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dang, J.B., Wang, L. and Lin, G.G. (2010) Global Attractor for Weekly Damped Generalized Equation in the Long Time. Journal of Mathematical Study, 43, 1-11.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>