The information paradox first surfaced in the early 1970s when Stephen Hawking of Cambridge University, building on earlier work by Jacob Bekenstein at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, suggested that black holes are not totally black. Hawking showed that particle-antiparticle pairs generated at the event horizon―the outer periphery of a black hole―would be separated. One particle would fall into the black hole while the other would escape, making the black hole a radiating body. Hawking’s theory implied that, over time, a black hole would eventually evaporate away, leaving nothing. This presented a problem for quantum mechanics, which dictates that nothing, including information, can ever be lost. If black holes withheld information forever in their singularities, there would be a fundamental flaw with quantum mechanics.

The significance of the information paradox came to a head in 1997 when Hawking, together with Kip Thorne of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in the US, placed a bet with John Preskill, also of Caltech. At the time, Hawking and Thorne both believed that information was lost in black holes, while Preskill thought that it was impossible. Later, however, Hawking conceded the bet, saying he believed that information is returned― albeit in a disguised state. At the turn of this century, Maulik Parikh of the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, together with Frank Wilczek of the Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton, US, showed how information could leak away from a black hole. In their theory, information-carrying particles just within the event horizon could tunnel through the barrier, following the principles of quantum mechanics. But this solution, too, remained debatable [1] -[5] . Information paradox is easily explained with the use of the information model of a black hole.

The basic law of Zeilinger’s quantum mechanics postulates that the elementary physical system (in particular, fundamental particles: quark, electron, photon) bears one bit of information [6] .The volume of information in physical systems is estimated the information entropy [7] -[10] . The information volume of a black hole of mass

is equal to nat, or bit [11] -[13] , where is the reduced Planck

constant, c is the speed of light, k_B is the Boltzmann constant, G is the gravitational constant, and is the mass of the black hole.

The information volume contained in the black hole is proportional to its squared mass. How to explain it? Let us assume that a black hole contains pairwise interacting particles (q-bits). Then the quadratic dependence of the volume of information in the black hole on its mass can be explained by the fact that each interaction forms 1 bit of information. The black hole is described with the wave function

. As mentioned earlier the volume of information in the system des- cribed with the present given function is equal to bit. At the volume of information in the black hole is proportional to the black hole squared mass. A black hole consisting of black particles contains the information, which is bit larger than a black hole consisting of particles:.

Let us compare the estimates of squared mass of a black hole: (from cosmological for- mula [11] -[13] ) and (squared mass of the particles composing the black hole). We have. As far as, then, or. Eventually we obtain the estimate of mass of particles being part of the black holes:

, that agree by its magnitude with Planck mass

:, where is the mass of the Planck

particle, mass of the particles composing the black hole.

Therefore, a black hole is the aggregate of particles (let us call them black particles) each having a mass equal to 0.23th of Planck mass) and interacting with all other black particles that form a black hole. Characteristics and models used in the paper are taken from [14] -[22] .

Suppose that at the initial instant of time a black hole consisting of black particles has the mass of

and contains bit of information. The black hole mass changes (increases or

decreases) by black particles (quanta). As far as each black hole has the sub-Planck mass, then the change in energy of a black hole in such a case is equal to. In the event of the loss of emission of one black particle the mass of a black hole becomes equal to. In this case the volume of

information remaining in the black hole is bit. Change (loss) of information in the black hole comes to bit.

For further estimates we implement the law of conservation of uncertainty (information) [14] -[23] and the law of conservation energy. According to the law of conservation of uncertainty (information) a change in the system “a black hole with the mass? external environment” on emission of one black particle must be balanced by the occurrence of particles containing 1 bit each: bit. It can believed that photons of frequency and energy emerged.

In virtue of energy conservation principle and Because, then the frequency of emitted photon must be equal to. Because , then. Let us denote . Then.

In the case of a black hole containing one black particle the radiation frequency is maximal and in inverse proportion to Planck time unit. Similar dependences are true for absorption of photons by black holes.

In the general case, there must appear photons having the frequency of and aggregated energy

equal to bit.

In the general case, there must appear particles with aggregated information equal to bit and aggre- gated energy.

In the general case, there must be absorbed photons having the frequencies and the aggregated energy

equal to bit.

In the general case, there must be absorbed particles with aggregated information equal to bit and aggregated energy.

Identical dependencies are true for cases when photons are absorbed by black holes. In virtue of the law of conservation of uncertainty (information), the changes in the system “a black hole with the mass? external environment”, when the mass of a black hole is increased by the mass of one black particle, must be determined by absorption of particles containing 1 bit each: bit. Suppose that there had been absorbed photons of frequency and energy. By virtue of energy conservation principle,. The frequency of each absorbed photon must be equal to

. At the formation of a black hole consisting one black particle the ab- sorption frequency is maximal and inversely proportional to Planck time unit.

Having the estimates of black holes distribution by mass one can calculate the intensity of aggregated distribution of black holes radiation by frequencies and compare them with the experiment results. From the obtained radiation frequency expression one can draw the estimate of black hole radiation temperature. We calculate the temperature of the radiation of a black hole. The thermal radiation of a black body is related to the

average energy of radiation, or. Since, then . The resulting estimate of temperature radiation from the black hole mass can be called information estimate of temperature, which coincides up to a factor with an estimate of Hawking [23] .

1) The volume of information in the black hole is proportional to the square of the mass black hole.

2) The information model of a black hole is:

・ A black hole is the aggregate of particles (black particles, q-bits) each having a mass equal to 0.23th of Planck mass) and interacting with all other black particles that form a black hole.

・ The black hole is described with the wave function

.

・ Volume of information in the system described with the present wave function is equal to bit. At the volume of information in the black hole is proportional to the black hole squared mass.

3) The temperature of the radiation of a black hole coincides up to a factor with an estimate of Hawking radiation.

4) A simple explanation of the information paradox with the information model of a black hole and the laws of conservation of uncertainty (information) and of conservation energy was made.

The author thanks N. Kardashev, I. Novikov, I. Sokolov, S. Shorgin, V. Sinitsin, V. Lipunov, L. Gindilis, M. Abubekerov, and especially A. Panov for the shown interest and support of this direction, and also for useful discussions of stated ideas.