The population renewal process of marine exploited fishes, responding to stochastic harvesting in a stochastic environment, is described by a discrete-time dynamics

with a growth-survival factor dependent on spawner abundances S, i.e. the escapement of adults from the harvest Y. The population biomass grows as a result of, not only growth of the surviving escapees in body weight, but also of recruitment of offspring. During year t an amount is harvested with a fraction

to the harvestable adult population, where denotes the fishing mortality.

All density dependence is assumed to be exerted by the adult population S [16] . It is a common observation that recruitment is unrelated to egg numbers over a wide range of spawner abundances [18] -[20] . Stochasticity enters the population dynamics in two ways, both as environmental variation mirrored by recruitment variability and as variation in the fishing mortality. Recruitment is presumed to track autocorrelated fluctuations in environmental variables. Fishers would expect this year to get as much catch as last year; there would also be some kind of inertia of fisheries management. There exist memory effects: adjacent values in the time-series of recruitment and catches-to-escapement ratio are correlated [21] .

In a stationary state (with equilibrium quantities denoted by the “” subscript), Equation (1), log-transformed, gives with the stationary fishing mortality, where is the stationary ratio of each year’s recruitment to the harvestable adult population. The relative deviations from equilibrium point are denoted as, , and. Natural and human-caused forces are considered as external disturbances. On the assumption that we are free to change and F independently of S around the equilibrium point, linearizing (log-transformed) Equation (1) yields a difference equation

with constant coefficient evaluated at equilibrium. The coefficient measures the (linear) elasticity of the system with respect to change in population size at equilibrium. The successive difference approximates the annual rate of increase of a population. For generating temporally structured noise,’s are both assumed to be described as a first-order autoregressive, AR(1), process with serial correlation coefficients and driven by mean-zero iid shocks. The linear stochastic difference Equation (2) is a discrete-time analogue of the Langevin equation driven by AR(1) processes. The autoregression coefficients are calculated by using the von Neumann’s ratio [22] [23] , the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance for AR(1) variable, that is,. Equation (2) is iterated to give the -year difference of population size

with.

The population process with multiple decay-rate constants is considered to calculate the asymptotic decay-time constant, i.e. the total equilibration time; the approach follows Roughgarden [11] . Let. Taking the mean squares over Equations (2) and (3) mediates the following two relations, respectively,

with the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance in population size, and

with the autocorrelation function of series at lag years

where the correction (the second term on the right-hand-side) is due to memory effects of external perturbations. From the recursion, , a corollary to Equation (5) is obtained:

Equations (4) and (7) yield the quadratic equation for the elasticity

Thus, the (linear) response of a system to external perturbations is expressed in terms of fluctuation properties of the system in equilibrium. The elasticity and the variance of population fluctuations cannot be independent, but they are related to each other in the equilibrium system [24] .

The average relaxation time of population fluctuations defines the total equilibration time as follows [24]

After the time memory of the initial conditions is lost: the deviation from the equilibrium is expected to decay away in an exponential fashion with a time constant given by the equilibration time. The total elasticity with respect to change in population size measures the strength D of total density dependence [10] [16] :

i.e. the expectation of change in population size given is equal to 100 × D percent negative feedback. Since the total density dependence is the asymptotic multiplicative growth rate of population per year, reads the asymptotic decay-rate constant. Smaller values of D indicate that systems return to equilibrium slower. Since the exponential-decay time is the inverse of the decay-rate constant, the total density dependence reads

Therefore, the density dependence D and the variance of population fluctuations are related to each other through the relation with Equation (5).

Equation (2) with (8) yields

(where each term is standardized), implying that, if a population is governed by slowly damped dynamics, external noises mask signals for evidence of deterministic behavior of the system. Unless the population exhibits damped-oscillator dynamics (i.e. over-compensation,), the relationship between and is characterized by large variance in growth rate; most of the changes in population size occur in a density-independent manner. If a perturbation brings the system away from the equilibrium point such that

, then the deterministic signal becomes visible over the noise; using Equations (4) and (5) this inequality reduces to

with

When one performs some observations for L years, the uncertainty in locating the population equilibrium,

, i.e. the standard deviation of the sample mean, propagates into the density dependence. The variance of is written as [13] [16] ,. Making use of the explicit form for the autocorrelation function (6) yields

with

By virtue of Equation (9), a time-equilibrium uncertainty relation is obtained:

where denotes a remainder term of order given by. Thus, L_c provides another measure of the time scale of population dynamics, and reads for with large valued

. Any observation over a short duration is associated with large indeterminacy. The supposed population equilibrium (chosen as the sample mean) and the length of time-series data are complementary: the uncertainty of population equilibrium is decreased by increasing the duration of observation. L_c is designated the complementary time. It is worth pointing out that the complementary time is always positive for, while the equilibration time can acquire either non-negative real number or complex number.

Let C_L be the degree of certainty, with which the supposed equilibrium lies within the bounds :

for normally distributed population fluctuations (with the true (population) standard deviation). This is equivalent to. Let be the sample mean, taken under the condition that n is larger (smaller) than the supposed equilibrium point, where is the number of observations in the time-series. The negative relationship of conditional sample mean of growth rate, , versus is expected to be visible with a probability C_L. The larger the probability C_L, the more accurately the density dependence D is measured from the population time-series.

In order to calculate the probability C_L, I analyze the time-series at different resolutions by constructing a coarse-grained time-series. Let and be the ceil and the floor functions. The coarse-grained time-series is built by taking the average inside a non-overlapping moving window with data points,

The coarse-grained time-series are considered to be serially independent. Accordingly, the uncertainty of population equilibrium (the standard deviation of the mean) is calculated to be

and the statistic

has a standard Gaussian distribution. In reality, we only have the sample standard deviation. So, replacing in Equation (11) by the square root of the sample variance, , yields a statistic which has Student’s t-distribution with degrees of freedom (d.f.); we can use the Student’s t-statistic to see how good the estimate of equilibrium population size. The value of C_L, i.e. the integral of Student’s t-PDF between, quantifies the ability to infer density dependence from a given (long) observation time-series, and is the two-tailed percentage point of Student’s t-distribution with. Accordingly, the following holds

(precisely the left-hand-side involves the remainder term of order). After L years’ observation the negative relationship is visible with a probability of C_L. Equation (12) with and yields

, implying that, when the observation series is longer than L_c years, the negative relationship is visible with a probability of 78.4% or more. When monitoring an equilibrium population (in the dynamic balance) for L years, the probability of the true equilibrium lying outside the bounds reads; the sample mean growth rate will then be observed, even when. The density dependence will be invisible with a probability of, that is, it has a tendency to overshoot and to leave the center point (i.e. sample average).

Empirical analysis [21] [25] suggests that population time-series from the North Atlantic fisheries are asymptotically stationary. The notion of asymptotic stationarity means that the probability density function of the variable monitored over a wide time interval exists and it is uniquely defined. The logarithmic changes in annual spawner abundance, , are Gaussian distributed and the observed mean r’s are not significantly different from zero. There is no important overall trend in spawner abundance, as expected in the equilibrium system [3] .

I now apply the theory for measuring density dependence to time series of North Atlantic commercial species, which are the same as the fish stocks analyzed in [26] ; there are 38 populations of ten species, cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), herring (Clupea harengus), mackerel (Scomber scombrus), plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), saithe (Pollachius virens), sardine (Sardina pilchardus), sole (Solea solea), sprat (Sprattus sprattus), and blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou). Data are extracted from the 2008 working group reports of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) [27] . The length of examined time-series ranges from 23 to 60 years. Estimates of model parameters are plotted against the equilibration time

in Figure 1. The estimates of D and are and years.

For a sufficiently long, Equation (3) with medium elasticity yields

where denotes time-independent random forcing with mean 0 and variance. This coarse-grained equation implies that, while for the signals (-year growth rate) are at the level of noise, if the system is displaced away from the equilibrium point, the negative relationship becomes visible over the noise on time scales longer than the marginal, equilibration time. Figure 2 demonstrates that though, when plotting annual growth rate against population size, the relationship well looks like a shotgun pattern, when

is plotted against, the negative feedback effects are visible, i.e. for.

After averaged over sizes in the time-series data over years, the negative relationship can be seen with a predicted probability, whereas the dependence of on in the data comprising

years is rather vague (upper panels of Figure 3). Besides, I perform simulations to validate the criterion for visibility of density-dependent relationship. For simulations based on the population equation of motion (2) with the AR(1) model for the variations in the recruitment and the fishing mortality, I use parameter values that are obtained by analyzing the ICES time-series data sets. When plotting the simulated diagrams of mean growth rate versus mean abundance, conditioned on, for the populations observed over years, the data are divided into two piles; for, the gap between the piles is closed up (lower panels of Figure 3). Of 1000 simulations for each population, the proportion of simulations in which the negative feedback on the sample mean growth rate is observed (i.e.) is plotted in Figure 4.

Recently, Ives et al. [10] developed a pragmatic approach based on the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model to assessment of ecological time-series, and identified the lagged structure in the data as the ARMA order. The time-lagged density-dependent effect in population fluctuations appears: the direction of annual change in population size depends on the past population trajectory.

Consider the system perturbed by multiple noise sources, where external perturbations follow AR(1) with autoregression coefficient, driven by mean-zero iid random shocks, under the assumption of mutual independence of’s (; note that the results obtained in the above section can be generalized to an arbitrary number of environmental variables). Start by picking a variable to eliminate, and substitute into both sides of the AR(1) equation; this procedure, repeated to eliminate one by one from the simultaneous equations, yields the ARMA model

with -dimensional vectors and. The ARMA coefficients

and are extracted by expanding the right-hand-side of the following pthand nd-degree polynomials

Since the characteristic equation for the pth-order AR component is, the roots are found from Equation (13) to be . We see that the delayed density dependence in population dynamics arises from serial correlation in the external stochastic forcing [12] [24] .

Equation (2), transformed into the ARMA(3,1) form, gives

where denotes the differencing operation, and is a sequence of two-dimensional independent random vectors. This third-order stochastic difference equation of population motion does not have an oscillatory solution (except for the period of two years), because’s are restricted between ±1. Figure 1 shows that the time constant of the dominant mode (with the slowest decay rate determined by the maximum eigenvalue) disagrees with the equilibration time. The differential coefficient of with respect to the variance, for fixed constant, is readily seen from Equation (5), as

with

where the variance varies linearly with the variance of. Accordingly, the equilibration time is not determined solely by the eigenvalues’s, but depends on the amplitude of population fluctuations through the driving noise of the AR(1) process.

I have shown that apparently density-independent influences, which arise from colored environmental variations, modulate the population elasticity. In the following let us further analyze the impact of color of environmental variation on the total density dependence in a population. Here, for mathematical simplicity, the effects of recruitment fluctuations are only taken into account on the variance in population abundance, where the inherent elasticity of the system is a given constant; the variance varies with the value of AR(1) coefficient (the variance of is fixed at a constant).

Equations (4), (5) and (7) describe the interaction between endogenous dynamics of the population and external disturbances. I demonstrate, in Figure 5, how color of recruitment variation affect the population fluctuations.

The total density dependence D decreases when redness of noise color is increased (an increase in the autocorrelation is denoted “increased redness”), and as for any. The reduction in negative feedback on population growth leads to a slowing down of the equilibration process: population fluctuations have very long relaxation times and the system returns to equilibrium very slowly. In the limit, the population imbalance follows a random walk irrespective of the values of. In a blue environment, as for any. In the limit, the system is expected to behave as

(with a mean-zero iid random variable), which is iterated to yield;

consequently, the amplitude jitter in the population oscillation exhibits a random-walk property and is non-stationary (regardless of the value). In the limit, while the system exhibits negative feedback, the population is not regulated. Both lead to reduction in population regulation, resulting in unstable dynamics: the amplitude of population fluctuations diverges asymptotically. Either way, , the variance reaches a minimum at. Note from Equation (13) that when, the temporal correlation of population fluctuations significantly decreases (fluctuations become white in time) and the population follows rapidly mean-reverting stochastic process. The effect of an increase in redness of noise is to enhance the uncertainty in locating the population equilibrium and the complementary time. In the limit, we are far from the allowed certainty in measuring density dependence, for any, regardless of L. It is also confirmed that in both the limits; while in the limit, the uncertainty of population equilibrium diverges less rapidly than the standard deviation of population fluctuationsi.e..