<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2014.56059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-45405</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The AdS&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt; &#215; S&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt; Fermionic Model
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>lcio</surname><given-names>Abdalla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antonio</surname><given-names>Lima-Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de S?o Carlos, S?o Carlso, Brazil </addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Instituto de Física, Universidade de S?o Paulo, S?o Paulo, Brazil </addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>eabdalla@fma.if.usp.br(LA)</email>;<email>dals@df.ufscar.br(AL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>483</fpage><lpage>487</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   We consider the AdS<sub>5</sub> &#215; S<sup>5</sup> integrable model. As it turns out, relying on well known arguments, we claim that the conformally invariant fermionic model is solvable, the resulting solution given in terms of two current algebras realizations. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Component</kwd><kwd> Formatting</kwd><kwd> Style</kwd><kwd> Styling</kwd><kwd> Insert</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Integrable models have a long and successful history [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref1">1</xref>] . In particular, models defined on a symmetric space are generally integrable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref4">4</xref>] . This means that an infinite number of local conservation laws exist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref2">2</xref>] , or at least one nonlocal conservation law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref5">5</xref>] . In general, such integrable models display a non vanishing mass gap, useful for describing the exact S-matrix in terms of rapidities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref6">6</xref>] . In such a line, a large number of models have been solved and their exactness on shell solution was obtained [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref7">7</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>There is also at least one model where no mass gap exists, but comprising non trivial conservation laws. It is the case of the chiral Gross-Neveu model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref11">11</xref>] . Supposing the existence of a mass gap, the model has been solved on shell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref13">13</xref>] . However, it is known that there is a non trivial fix point such that the theory allows for a conformally invariant solution as well, for a given value of the coupling constant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>This means that an integrable model can also contain a conformally invariant solution. This is a quite non trivial fact that we wish to explore in case of integrable models relevant for string theory, where conformal invariance is a very desirable property.</p><p>In the framework of string theory, it is possible to gather information about the Yang-Mills theory at intermediate coupling. Obtaining a strongly coupled field theory underlying the QCD string actually provides an integrable model in the world sheet, and the low dimensionality of the problem may imply exact solvability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>In that case, the symmetry of the integrable model is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\386cf4da-e5a3-47b5-8be9-cf4a0e03e670.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The bosonic part of such a coset is AdS<sub>5</sub> &#215; S<sup>5</sup>, which will be our main concern. Most of the literature is related, in this case, to integrable models and their nonlocal conservation laws [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref17">17</xref>] . Currents for the pure spinor superstring in AdS<sub>5</sub> &#215; S<sup>5</sup> have subsequently been constructed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref18">18</xref>] . While the role of AdS<sub>5</sub> is largely discussed in relation to string solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref20">20</xref>] , integrable structures are related to the underlying string spectrum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Later, the non local charges have also been related to a BRST cohomology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref22">22</xref>] ensuring κ-symmetry. One thus conjectured that conformal invariance should be related to the integrable models relevant to string theory.</p><p>On the other hand, in string theory, a lot has been done concerning integrability of the underlying symmetry of strings in certain backgrounds. In Maldacena’s conjecture, four-dimensional N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory is dual to super strings in AdS<sub>5</sub> &#215; S<sup>5</sup> background [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref23">23</xref>] . But</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48010"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\673192df-da42-4dca-8975-6670e0f94a3a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This means that the model is defined on a symmetric space, thus implying a non trivial (and non local) conservation law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref2">2</xref>] . Moreover, since the symmetric space is a direct product of symmetric spaces with simple gauge groups, the sigma model defined on that space is also integrable at the quantum level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref4">4</xref>] . On the other hand, conformal invariance is very useful in string theory and the question is whether these models display conformal invariance, at least in some form. The answer is positive, as we show.</p><p>We shall consider a fermionic model defined upon the space (1). Following old and well established arguments we see that at a well defined value of the coupling constant the theory is conformally invariant.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Conserved Currents</title><p>The above mentioned fermionic model is defined by the lagrangian density</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48011"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\1a78d2bd-8fdc-4d18-a210-efbbcaeda2df.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where we define the currents are given by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\497f5b6b-5a22-41c1-afb9-1f5e8ab2130a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\a423e7a6-b42c-449c-a08c-52a0599ffc70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. They are related to the first or second factors defining the underlying symmetry group, that is, we identify the labels <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\53657e3e-cc03-4582-8310-2e432f259072.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as being in SO(5,1) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\05b2f700-499f-42a1-a3ee-81f293125605.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in SO(6). Here, g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>2</sub> are, up to now, arbitrary coupling constants.</p><p>The field equation for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\b923c099-e245-4aee-bad1-edb667ef4366.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48012"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\6a504c69-a1c2-498e-b3b9-9a6c277acda8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>while</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48013"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\de92f0b6-13f5-409b-a2d3-fda26526af06.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the field equation for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\f4a0a89d-0d1f-489f-91dc-be2914cff099.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The Noether currents related to the symmetries SO(5,1) and SO(6), respectively, obey the conservation equations <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\78d7fe8a-98c2-4be3-b9b9-ce2fe65312af.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\0ccb782e-35fd-462d-b125-894b44f6c858.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let us now consider the axial currents (non) conservation laws. Using the relations for the γ_{μ} matrices we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\19-7501601x\0cca9488-56ef-4208-ae4d-54b729f9a34e.png" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48014"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\5b355957-7214-4e8c-9ddb-246e0d8e17cc.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48015"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\46e5c7ff-ed27-429b-b258-a303d1ac3ea8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We can compute the divergence of the axial current,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\f00cb271-32cf-462a-82ca-54dc429859a3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48016"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\ad81ad66-44d4-4011-ac2a-6ea2edc8f43e.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account the field equations we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48017"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\f5a330cb-b37d-44ad-bb46-47312320d388.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here we note that the terms with the g<sub>1</sub> coefficient are products of two currents while the terms with g<sub>2</sub> coefficient are cancelled, that is,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48018"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\cd2acb50-65e2-47ee-8703-74951b36cb67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48019"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\eb09e2a9-585d-4e3b-853b-f208c02b224b.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the final result is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48020"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\965d5ab1-d4b2-4ab1-8df5-ee17ee849d3c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the axial current <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\adc9ddf3-e691-4e72-bb07-19598f2ef3f8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> fails to be conserved classically.</p><p>A similar result follows for the axial current<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\004b6778-86ae-40a7-a191-6029c18acb94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48021"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\cf3a54ce-b3f2-40aa-8622-ee1fcb2de64c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We consider now the axial anomaly contribution to the field equations. We introduce the gauge field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\470d042b-e157-4f23-8bbc-5305eed626b1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in order to identify the anomaly term</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48022"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\8399f188-b330-498b-b1ba-6badbf5264d4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>to be added to the divergence equation for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\40b3be90-a507-49f8-9177-9130fc90a785.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48023"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\3f25611b-47fb-437f-8c12-a7ce2998ef21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where N is the number of species, in this case equal to 6. We are thus led to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48024"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\ba1cd6b6-9859-4d03-b197-3795267deb9c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the choice <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\67dd25f4-7af2-4452-96d2-5adaeceb64d1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> implies that the axial current is also conserved,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48025"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\ec514e8a-1fb7-47ce-80f6-283f79a33227.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This means conformal invariance in the coset SO(5,1)/O(4,1). Notice that, mutatis mutandis we get similar a result for the SO(6)/O(5) factor, as well as conformal invariance for all spaces of the kind <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\0fd3f7af-de86-4d74-992d-b29d4ce4d781.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in case we carefully choose the coupling. Thus, at the point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\5fcf8ffc-41ee-495b-a8aa-540af130eae6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the second axial current is conserved</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48026"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\83b093ab-10d3-4e30-be62-5dd968e48957.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the fermionic theory in the coset SO(6)/(O(5) is conformally invariant.</p><p>An alternative and equivalent proof of conformal invariance at a given coupling can be obtained by arguments already known in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref14">14</xref>] . Thus, for these values of g₁ and g₂ we get the conformal field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\d2645b43-c143-491d-9714-8926162c4722.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with SO(5,1)/ SO(4,1) &#215; SO(6))/SO(5) conformal invariance.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Currente Algebra</title><p>We can write the equal-time commutation rules</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48027"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\b19b31c5-a21a-4a82-98b6-2ec797e2307e.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where C<sub>1</sub> and C<sub>2</sub> (= 0 or − C<sub>1</sub>) are c-number Schwinger terms. In addition, we also have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48028"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\d300cc90-2a3d-4fe5-b495-1cce44675570.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where D<sub>1</sub> and D<sub>2</sub> (= 0 or − D<sub>1</sub>) are also c-number Schwinger terms.</p><p>Here we note the structure constants <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\d12d30d9-c5b6-429c-9dea-65cb97d18251.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the factor group SO(5,1)/O(4,1) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\454360ac-8e4d-43d7-810e-864a163008e9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of SO(6)/O(5).</p><p>Using</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48029"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\3bf08b2b-47c0-4892-a4fc-08ab539e14b2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we can deduce from the equal-time commutation relations the commutation rules for any space-time point,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48030"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\cbc2bd47-82e8-4858-826a-6fd3a21107e1.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We can now decompose also the currents <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\80eb009b-7e45-4622-8713-04af7a689d91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into creation and annihilation parts, each one of massless excitations. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48031"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\41b84ea3-0968-4602-bbb6-695617379e17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where (+) is the creation part and (‒) the annihilation part. Note that here two creation or two annihilation operators of different SO(5,1)/O(4,1) indices do not commute.</p><p>One finds also</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45405-formula48032"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\19-7501601x\0d59d1fe-5a12-4500-bb36-4746ba8381a8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, due to Jacobi identity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\f0c949fe-6603-4cb2-afaa-1b8b700c822f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\b3e80292-07ed-4a5f-b702-1814526932d9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A similar construction with the current <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\19-7501601x\b5812a88-f15a-47fc-92d1-2cbe9c26015b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be trivially obtained.</p><p>Correlation functions are now immediately obtained from the methods of two-dimensional conformally invariant Quantum Field Theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45405-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The by now rather expected results displayed above mean that integrable models can have a conformally invariant counterpart. The fact that in string theory one needs conformal invariance as a building block forces us into the above solution at least for the fermionic models in question.</p><p>The rather important unanswered question is about what happens in case of a purely bosonic theory, or also, maybe even more important, to the model defined on a graded manifold. In the last case, in view of the unbroken supersymmetry, we are led to a conjecture concerning such sigma models, namely we conjecture that such models have a conformal fix point where the correlators are exactly solvable and present the previous symmetry.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work has been supported by FAPESP and CNPq, Brazil.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.45405-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E., Abdalla, M.C.B. and Rothe, K.D. (2001) Non Perturbative Methods in 2-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eichenherr, H. and Forger, M. (1981) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 82, 227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E., Abdalla, M.C.B. and Forger, M. (1988) Nuclear Physics B, 297, 374. Abdalla, E. and Forger, M. (1986) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 104, 123. Abdalla, E. and Abdalla, M.C.B. (1981) M. Gomes Physical Review D, 23, 1800.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.825</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E., Forger, M. and Gomes, M. (1982) Nuclear Physics, B210, 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90238-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luscher, M., Pohlmeyer, K. (1978) Nuclear Physics, B137, 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(78)90049-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamolodchikov, A.B. and Zamolodchikov, A.B. (1979) Annals of Physics, 120, 253-291.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(79)90391-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E., Abdalla, M.C.B., Lima-Santos, A. (1984) Physical Letters, B140, 71-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)91050-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E. and Forger, M. (1851) A. Lima Santos Nuclear Physics, B256, 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90389-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E. (1984) A. Lima-Santos Physical Review, D29, 1851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima-Santos, A. and Martins, M.J. (2007) Nuclear Physics, B760, 184-196. Lima-Santos, A. (2006) Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 0612, P12018. Malara, R. and Lima-Santos, A. (2006) Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 0609, P09013. Kurak, V. (2005) A. Lima-Santos Journal of Physics, A38, 2359-2374.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gross, D.J. (1974) Andre Neveu Physical Reviews, D10, 3235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.3235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, E., Berg, B. and Weisz, P. (1979) Nuclear Physics, B157, 387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90110-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koberle, R., Kurak, V., Swieca, J.A. (1979) Physical Reviews, D20, 897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.897</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dashen, R.F. and Frishman, Y. (1975) Physical Reviews, D11, 2781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2781</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bena, I., Polchinski, J. and Roiban, R. (2004) Physical Reviews, D69, 046002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.046002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maldacena, J. and Ooguri, H. (2001) Journal of Mathematical Physics, 42, 2929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1377273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maldacena, J. and Maoz, L. (2002) 046; I. Bakas and J. Sonnenschein JHEP 0212 (2002) 049.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vallilo, B. (2004) JHEP 0403 (2004) 037.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandal, G., Suryanarayana, N.V. and Wadia, S.R. (2002) Physical Letters, B543, 81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02424-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berenstein, D., Maldacena, J.M. and Nastase, H. (2002) JHEP 0204 (2002) 013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatsuda, M. and Yoshida, K. (2005) Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 9, 703-728.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kluson, J. (2007) 040; Nathan Berkovits JHEP 0502 (2005) 060.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45405-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maldacena, J.M. (1998) Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2, 231-252.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>