<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2014.56052</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-45321</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Pair Production in Non-Perturbative QCD
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alah</surname><given-names>Hamieh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hamiehs@yahoo.fr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>402</fpage><lpage>406</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this paper, a method to calculate the vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude in the presence of a non-abelian background field is introduced. The number of non-perturbative quark-antiquark produced per unit time, per unit volume and per unit transverse momentum from a given constant chromo-electric field is calculated and its application to quark-gluon plasma is presented. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pair Production</kwd><kwd> Non-Perturbative QCD</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Lattice QCD predicts a phase transition from Hadrons gaz (HG) to quark-gluon plasma (QGP) at deconfinement temperature, T <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\a21f28d6-7cd8-41ec-8e35-326863467ed5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> 170 MeV. It is believed that QGP has been produced in relativistic heavy ions collision [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref4">4</xref>] where in the initial pre-equilibrium stage of QGP about half the total center-of-mass energy, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\5a12607e-4e16-4b61-875a-8b233be419eb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, goes into the production of a semi-classical gluon field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref5">5</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref17">17</xref>] . Therefeore, to study the production of a QGP from a classical chromo field, it is necessary to know how quarks and gluons are formed from the latter. The production rate of quark-antiquark from a given constant chromo-electric field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\126d7669-df2d-4a09-8540-8fe971d170c6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been derived in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref18">18</xref>] and the integrated <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\0f8bc9cf-4ff3-4a38-9560-b52901d1476a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> distribution has been obtained in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref19">19</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref22">22</xref>] (for a review see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref23">23</xref>] ).</p><p>In this short technical note, we will extend the results of Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref18">18</xref>] to a general constant background field. The method presented here may simplify the complexity found in the Non-perturbative QCD calculations. Also, the obtained <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\010107ba-147d-40b0-afdd-fcb52a73bdc0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> distribution for quark (antiquark) production can be used in the analysis of the experimental results at the RHIC and the LHC colliders.</p><p>The paper is organized as follows: in the next section, we will calculate the one loop effective action needed in the evaluation of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\8165c032-32b5-4d33-8e16-bba2f94a6459.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> distribution of the quark (antiquark) production. In Section 3 the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\a474b059-f820-4745-a44c-7d8c5fd8784e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> distribution is presented. Finally, in Section 4, an application to heavy ion collision is given.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The One Loop Effective Action</title><p>As described in the above section, we will evaluate here the one loop effective action in the presence of a constant chromo-field. For this purpose, we start from the QCD Lagrangian density for a quark in a non-abelian background field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\c3f2c24e-e09a-494f-b7ff-905f36fbea79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29825"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\c9314e7a-6b3c-424f-a29f-a7eb6617bc62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29826"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\d8fbd607-090d-4154-8eb9-3100fc6a6715.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And the one loop effective action can be written in this form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29827"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\44736911-a61a-4932-8ca5-dd9fc1f56bc6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, using the invariance of trace under transposition and the following relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29828"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\1b85fede-d5cf-48ef-8482-690fffaaa811.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we obtain the following expression1</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29829"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\05271f66-3ccd-4d34-ab12-4ef8e487792f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The quickest way to calculate the effective action is to work in a basis <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\07ad2258-ceba-4e3a-b46c-262b98f356e6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that are the eigenstates of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\f62f08a6-a6d5-4bc3-8714-96eb50257e8b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29830"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\46eea95e-9d8f-4cfb-a6d9-0c38abbe9391.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is a part of the one loop effective action <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\1fec647c-e707-45d8-a226-85555eb0754e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of Equation (5).</p><p>As an application to this idea, we first consider the case of a constant electric field in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\c80b32c9-23f1-47ef-8b1e-1b463f9646ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> direction (direction of the beam in the heavy ion collision). In this case, we choose a gauge such that we can take<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\8394ce33-1403-4f2d-8276-5adc7703e103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus the second part of Equation (6) can be written in this form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29831"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\0503054d-395d-4c19-94a8-c46a152b2189.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Hamiltonian becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29832"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\c3c8025e-a466-4b23-b269-8e320961f35f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>After a straightforward algebra one can find the following eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\9cd244a5-2ea2-4cbb-92b6-c4a9ab0bb7a6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29833"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\03e9ef4b-97c4-4b4a-af9c-fd8af2d30560.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>&#160;</p><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\b98fc064-c98d-4ae8-a553-3b83d1b08500.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the eigenvalues over the Dirac matrices such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\7df4d3c3-213b-4242-9e1e-ec9108bfdcbc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\7525430d-a0c6-4bc7-b9f8-bb4f71d2eed0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. And<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\66b6f5c8-c7ba-4fda-a64c-23f4d3444f06.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\95a57305-22a8-4bfa-81c1-78d922438a8c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, are the eigenvalue for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\27cc8ab8-09b7-42dd-914d-04f58a15332c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> over the group space and are given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29834"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\8cc6fbe2-6763-46f8-bc0a-06158df67fba.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\27acd13b-27b8-4b81-95fc-1a3cf3ff8b8f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29835"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\be1bcbb3-3b8d-4297-829a-28796c6cbe1c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29836"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\6880b71c-96de-4f00-9c4f-3570bc8c25a8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the obtained eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\bddef196-f031-4ea7-875d-38fdbb963050.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the effective action becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29837"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\0a3e4c7e-a1ad-405d-95c6-0e510f42ed72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Performing the i and n summations we found</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29838"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\ca5a4c36-e9b1-47c1-a547-49eee2e1d35d.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is the same results as Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref18">18</xref>] . Clearly, the one loop magnetic effective action can be found upon the following substitution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\e5472aef-5f6f-41ab-922c-663410e84638.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29839"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\719cc1df-cd06-48d2-85ab-b1a567f45ad1.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Pair Production in Non-Perturbative QCD</title><p>Now, in the same manner as in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref18">18</xref>] we may derive the non-perturbative quarks (antiquarks) production per unit time, per unit volume and per unit transverse momentum from a given constant chromo-electric field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\bbabf3c4-42db-42ca-b619-bf858761b6da.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus as done in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref18">18</xref>] we can find that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45321-formula29840"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\12-7501461x\436f95a3-9e7d-4a77-97a4-a03cff2484a8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\2bdd0c7a-cd04-4595-b58a-d988df15b555.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the effective mass of the quark and the eigenvalues <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\879a8a57-fb57-4c55-ac52-6de1615a2afc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are given above.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Application to Heavy Ion Collisions</title><p>Let's consider the situation of two relativistic heavy nuclei colliding and leaving behind a semi-classical gluon field which then non-perturbatively produces gluon and quark-antiquark pairs via the Schwinger mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref19">19</xref>] . As estimated in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref24">24</xref>] for Au-Au collision at RHIC collider with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\0be37c52-8cb8-4534-8217-3aeef0679df0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> fm and center-of-mass energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\e69b457a-9416-4ce4-90aa-6e5edebe9753.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GeV per nucleon, the initial energy density is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\3ab74d42-69e5-458d-b0b1-4678469d8d96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GeV<sup>4</sup> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\20ee9470-dd7c-41e1-97c7-7380a3406d9f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GeV<sup>4</sup>. For our analysis we take <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\7a742765-b6a0-438b-a29d-3d3ebe48faa8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which can be justified by the sensitivity check that has been made in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref24">24</xref>] where it has been found that the production rate is not very sensitive to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\86aaa020-413f-4da4-8d28-57fe72e5830d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> we plot the rate of quark production as a function of the transverse momentum for two values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\fda1fbe0-c163-46bb-a86e-568b13e0bc3a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (used in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref25">25</xref>] ) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\379f578a-1511-428b-aa54-bb2d16ad89fe.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with initial energy density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\5778aee9-199e-481b-ab4b-e0530c21cd19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GeV<sup>4</sup>. Clearly seen from this figure that the production rate decrease with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\3404bf97-aad0-48a0-91f6-b0edc3c112c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and becomes negligible at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\154f2369-c923-4471-b015-20f1b37dbdf6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GeV. The obtained <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\88f287c4-f32d-40dd-a98d-38523a52a1cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> distribution for quark (antiquark) production can be used to fix the initial conditions for the QGP in heavy ion collision at the RHIC and the LHC colliders.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this note we have proposed a method for calculating the vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude in the presence of the non-abelian background field. The method can be applied to a general background field and it can be updated to study the non-perturbative soft gluon production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45321-ref26">26</xref>] . Also, we have evaluated the rate for</p><p>quark (antiquark) production in a constant chromo-electric field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\12-7501461x\7195e32f-8f29-4aaa-9b27-eb2a0a09d32c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. These results are used to determine the quark (antiquark) production rate in heavy ion collision.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.45321-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collins, J.C. and Perry, M.J. (1975) Physical Review Letters, 34, 1353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.1353</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karsch, F., Laermann, E. and Peikert, A. (2000) Physics Letters B, 478, 447-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00292-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamieh, S., Letessier, J. and Rafelski, J. (2003) Physical Review A, 67, Article ID: 014301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.014301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamieh, S., Redlich, K. and Tounsi, A. (2004) Journal of Physics G, 30, 481, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/30/4/007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baym, G. (1984) Physics Letters B, 138, 18-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)91863-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kajantie, K. and Matsui, T. (1985) Physics Letters B, 164, 373-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)90343-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eskola, K.J. and Gyulassy, M. (1993) Physical Review C, 47, 2329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.47.2329</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nayak, G.C. and Ravishankar, V. (1997) Physical Review D, 55, 6877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6877</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nayak, G.C. and Ravishankar, V. (1998) Physical Review C, 58, 356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.356</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhalerao, R.S. and Nayak, G.C. (2000) Physical Review C, 61, Article ID: 054907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.054907</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kluger, Y., Eisenberg, J.M., Svetitsky, B., Cooper, F. and Mottola, E. (1991) Physical Review Letters, 67, 2427; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2427</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kluger, Y., Eisenberg, J.M., Svetitsky, B., Cooper, F. and Mottola, E. (1992) Physical Review D, 45, 4659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4659</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kharzeev, D. and Tuchin, K. hep-ph/0501234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McLerran, L. and Venugopalan, R. (1994) Physical Review D, 50, 2225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2225</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dietrich, D.D., Nayak, G.C. and Greiner, W. (2001) Physical Review D, 64, Article ID: 074006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.074006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gyulassy, M. and McLerran, L. (1997) Physical Review C, 56, 2219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56.2219</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dietrich, D.D. Physical Review D, 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nayak, G.C. and Van Nieuwenhuizen, P. (2005) Physical Review D, 72, 125010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.125010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwinger, J. (1951) Physical Review, 82, 664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.82.664</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Claudson, M., Yildiz, A. and Cox, P.H. (1980) Physical Review D, 22, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Casher, A., Neuberger, H. and Nussinov, S. (1979) Physical Review D, 20, 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.179</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glendenning, N.K. and Matsui, T. (1983) Physical Review D, 28, 2890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2890</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dunne, G.V. (2004) Heisenberg-Euler Effective Lagrangians: Basics and Extensions, hep-th/0406216. In: Shifman, M., et al., Eds., From Fields to Strings, Vol. 1, 445-522.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooper, F., Dawson, J.F. and Mihaila, B. (2008) Physical Review D, 78, 117901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.117901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aurenche, P. and Zakharov, B.G. arXiv:1205.6462 [hep-ph].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45321-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">work in progress.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>