<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-1985</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oje.2014.45026</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJE-45105</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Association of &lt;i&gt;Ammodramus bairdii&lt;/i&gt; A. 1844, and Other Species of Grassland Granivorous Birds in Winter Time in Northwestern Mexico
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ose</surname><given-names>Hugo Martinez-Guerrero</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Emilio Pereda-Solis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Wehenkel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juarez del Estado de Durango, Durango, 
Mexico</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Facultad de MedicinaVeterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Juarez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>conplandg@hotmail.com(MEP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>04</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>281</fpage><lpage>288</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   During the winter of 2009 grassland birds were monitored in the region of Cuchillas de la Zarca to estimate the association betweenAmmodramus bairdiiAudubon 1844, focal species of grassland and bird species belonging to the trophic guild of grassland granivorous birds (n = 25 ). The study area was divided into monitoring quadrants (n = 16) where 96 transects for bird monitoring were conducted, recording 16,635 individuals of which only 32.9% were in the trophic guild of grassland granivorous birds. The association betweenA. bairdiiand other species was estimated from the nonparametric statistical index of Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) and the p value, through permutation analysis (n = 10,000), finding positive and significant associations (p≤0.05) of the target species for study withSturnella magna,Passerculus sandwichensisandAmmodramus savannarum, species that share habitat preferences of natural grassland in good condition, slightly grazed and with little tolerance to the shrub cover. The association W ranged from 0.072 and 0.749. These results can recognize this region as an important area for the conservation of obligate grassland birds during winter, suggesting establish training programs to better utilize this resource by means of cattle activity. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Grassland Birds</kwd><kwd> Kendall Coefficient</kwd><kwd> Baird’s Sparrow</kwd><kwd> Winter Monitoring</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The grassland is the most threatened ecosystem of the earth. There are various causes explaining this: agricultural intensification, urbanization, energy development, expansion of invasive species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref1">1</xref>] . Consequently, and for a few decades, the grassland bird populations have declined continuously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>These facts become important when the habitat for several obligate grassland bird species is broken or lost [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref3">3</xref>] and it becomes a critical factor in conserving birds/habitat when such changes occur in both “working” lands as wintering grounds. With regard to this, recent work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref4">4</xref>] has stated that 88% of grassland bird species breed in the Great Plains of North America and 90% of them spend winter in the Chihuahuan Desert, giving a clear idea of the magnitude of the problem.</p><p>Within this group of birds there are some species whose populations have declined to a greater degree than others, where currently efforts are made between Canada, the US and Mexico to expand the knowledge about them and develop proposals for their preservation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>This is the case of the Baird’s sparrow (Ammodramus bairdii) which is one of the grassland bird species that has a strong negative trend (−3.0% per year) in its population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref2">2</xref>] , of which there is not sufficient information of its stay at winter lands, particularly in Mexico [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref7">7</xref>] , where the increase of the agricultural frontier and the low- tech extensive cattle raising cause reduction of grassland areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>In that sense, abundance and distribution of Ammodramus bairdii [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref10">10</xref>] as well as other 49 obligate grass- land bird species such as Anthus spragueii, Calcarius ornatus, Ammodramus savannarum, Pooecetes gramineus, is taken as a priority; they require native grasslands in good condition by taking the structure of vegetation as a key element in research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref11">11</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>These sparrows and other wintering birds depend almost entirely on the seeds of plants in their diet to survive the winter months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref16">16</xref>] . Therefore, the availability of seeds in the soil has a direct impact on the composi- tion and dynamics of bird communities during winter.</p><p>However, little effort has been made to know how this species can be associated with others of similar beha- vior and conditions of habitat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref17">17</xref>] , in Mexico and in winter season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Therefore the objective of this study was to determine the association of Ammodramus bairdii, with other species of grassland granivores that share the winter habitat in the Cuchillas de la Zarca region of northwestern Mexico, to increase awareness of species whose populations decline annually and help to highlight the impor- tance of the region for the preservation of this and other obligate grassland wintering birds.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study area was located in the priority region for preservation of grassland (APCP) called Cuchillas de la Zarca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref5">5</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), and is part of the Chihuahuan Desert. It comprises the southern state of Chihuahua and the northern state of Durango, Mexico, with an area of 6297 km<sup>2</sup>, between the geographical coordinates 105˚04'30.86'' W and 24˚41' 41.28'' N and 104˚ 57'07.48'' W and 25˚ 27'04.24'' N.</p><p>Vegetation consists of xeric scrub (91%), and natural grasslands (9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref19">19</xref>] , where the shrub layer consisted of the genera: Larrea, Prosopis, Acacia, Ephedra, Nolina and Opuntia, Juniperus and Quercus, the herbaceous layer consisted of genera: Bouteloa, Aristida, Buchloe, Andropogon, Muhlenbergia, Sporobolus, Heteropogon, Pleuraphis.</p><p>The average altitude of the area is 1850 m asl, in the study grassland of private and municipal properties were included and temperature of the coldest month was −3˚C to 18˚C.</p><p>A GIS was used to build a mesh of squares (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) of 18 km per side covering the entire surface of APCP, of all quadrants (N = 36), those where natural grassland is present (n = 16) were selected. In those where there are available roads (over 5 km), sampling points (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) were located every 500 m, which received a random number, so that in the first three (1-3) transects were carried out for bird monitoring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Methodology for bird monitoring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref20">20</xref>] consisted of two observers trained to recognize grassland birds in paired transects, walking tours of a mile were made, one-time, with support from a GPS Garmin Etrex&#174;.</p><p>At each sampling point observers walked perpendicularly to the road, using 8 &#215; 42 binoculars, and species and number of birds observed were recorded. Monitoring was conducted between January 20 and February 21, 2009, between 08:00 and 12:00 each day, and then we brought together the Ammodramus bairdii (AMMBAI)</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location of the priority region for grassland conservation in Cuchillas de la Zarca</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-1380216x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Quadrant sample with points and paired transects</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-1380216x7.png"/></fig><p>and the trophic guild species of grassland granivores using the four-letter code [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref21">21</xref>] , placing number of birds per species per monitored quadrant.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The measure of association between AMMBAI and granivorous grassland bird species was performed using the nonparametric statistic Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W). This is a normalization of the Friedman statis- tical test, and can be used to measure the degree of concordance between different trials that are assumed to a group or n objects. For the present study they are represented by bird species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>The close relationship between the Spearman’s r<sub>s</sub> correlation coefficient and W was used to calculate the Kendall’s statistics, where W can be calculated directly from the mean ( ) of Spearman (r<sub>s</sub>) paired correlations from the following relationship [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref22">22</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref24">24</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45105-formula91460"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-1380216x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where p is the number of variables among which the Spearmen correlation coefficients are calculated. For the case of the two W variables it is a linear transformation of r<sub>s</sub>: W = (r<sub>s</sub> +1)/2.</p><p>Equation (1) shows that trials can only be concordant if the Spearman correlation is positive, two trials having perfectly opposite ranges for a group of objects have a negative correlation r<sub>s</sub> = −1, therefore W = 0, which means that there is no concordance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>Permutation analysis was used to verify that the observed associations (W) are or are not random results. For this situation, a test of permutations of W for two variables is the exact equivalent of a permutation test of r<sub>s</sub> for the same variables. The significant probabilities (p value) were obtained in terms of the proportion of permuta- tions for which the association was measured, above their observed values. On this basis, the observed values of W may be interpreted as highly significant or significantly small if p is lower than 0.05 or higher than 0.95, re- spectively. For both cases, it is assumed that forces which do not depend on random are involved in the observed associations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>The parametric statistics of data from birds was performed using the SAS&#174; PROC UNIVARIATE.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Ninety six transects were carried out in the winter of 2009 in the APCP of Cuchillas de la Zarca for bird moni- toring. Each transect was 1 km long, 6 transects per quadrant (n = 16), recording 16,635 birds distributed in 31 families of 63 genera and 79 different species, of which 26 (32.9%) were located within the trophic guild of grassland granivores to a total of 7257 individuals.</p><p>The relative abundance values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) place this region (APCP) as the most important in the Chihuahuan desert for many species of migrant birds by their diversity and it is first in winter abundance of Ammodramus bairdii [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>The results of the estimation of Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) between the abundance of Ammo- dramus bairdii and the other 25 species of granivorous grassland birds are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The analysis of the calculation of the association by Kendall concordance index (W) between Baird’s sparrow and 25 species of birds belonging to the trophic guild of grassland granivores shows different values of associa- tion, although they share the same habitat, birds of different species establish distinct patterns of movements between wintering birds, as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref28">28</xref>] found in Arizona.</p><p>Association values found of W vary between 0.272 and 0.749, but only 3 of these associations (12%) were positive and significant (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref29">29</xref>] states in his study on the influence of seed availability in shaping the diet and winter habitat selection in bird communities of arid grassland that between bird species there is preference for different seeds, where size, shape, and energy content affect how the habitat is shared by birds, so the association between gra- nivorous species can be explained by this fact.</p><p>In this respect the found association with eastern meadowlark (Sturnella magna) was the highest and ex- plained by the preference of this species for native grasslands in good condition with plenty of organic matter in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref30">30</xref>] , habitat characteristics that shares with Baird’s sparrow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref31">31</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><p>Similarly, the Ammodramus bairdii was associated with Passerculus sandwichensis although there are differ- ences in foraging and behavior of both species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref34">34</xref>] , perhaps because they prefer just as Baird’s sparrow open habitats with shortly grazed natural grasslands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref35">35</xref>] .</p><p>The association with Ammodramus savannarum can be explained because both species avoid grasslands with extensive shrub covers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref36">36</xref>] and prefer plant associations dominated by the genera Bouteloa and Aristida ssp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref29">29</xref>] , such as those found in the study area.</p><p>For other species the calculation of the association was not statistically significant, since most of them have higher tolerance than Baird’s sparrow to plant structures with less coverage of natural grasslands and greater shrub coverage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45105-ref38">38</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The association between Baird’s sparrow and other 25 species of granivorous grassland birds in the region of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Bird abundance of granivorous guild species in the region of Cuchillas de la Zarca, 2009</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Key<sup>a</sup><sub> </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average<sup>b </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard error<sup>b </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abundance %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aimophila boterii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AIMBOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aimophila cassinii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AIMCAS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aimophila ruficeps</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AIMRUF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammodramus bairdii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.675</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammodramus savanarum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMSAV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.102</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amphispiza bileniata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMPBIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.639</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anthus spragueii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANTSPR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.551</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calamospiza melanocorys</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CALMEL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcarius ornatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CALORN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.897</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Callipepla squamata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CALSQU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.736</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carpodacus mexicanus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CARMEX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.151</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chondestes gramacus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CHOGRA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.492</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eremophila alpestris</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EREALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Melospiza linconlii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MELLIN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.124</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molothrus ater</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MOLATE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.578</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Passerculus sandwichsensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PASSAN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.746</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pipilo fuscus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIPFUS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.675</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pooecetes gramineus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >POOGRA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1607</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.144</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spizella breweri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SPIBRE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.535</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spizella palida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SPIPAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.039</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spizella passerina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SPIPAS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1871</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.782</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sturnella magna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STUMAG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sturnella neglecta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STUNEG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zenaida asiatica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZENASI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.785</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zenaida macroura</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZENMAC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.628</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zonotrichia leucoprys</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZONLEU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a: Keys of six characters, International Nomenclatura, AOU, 2009. http://www.birdpop.org/AlphaCodes.htm, b: Calculated by SAS&#174; PROC UNIVARIATE.</p><p>Cuchillas deZarca during winter season, using the Kendall’s concordance index (W) showed that there are dif- ferences between birds that use seeds as the only source of food.</p><p>The results highlighting the association between A. bairdii and S. magna, P. sandwichensis and A. savannarum show consistency and biological explanation since all of these species share preferences for common habitat characteristics, such as natural grasslands in good condition, slightly grazed, small areas of bare soil and low presence of bushes.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Association (W) between AMMBAI and bird species of granivorus trophic guild of grassland in Cuchillas de la Zarca, 2009</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asociation (W)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/SPIBRE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.431</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/PIPFUS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/AIMCAS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/CALORN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/SPIPAS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/STUMAG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02<sup> a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/EREALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/CALMEL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/CHOGRA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/ZENMAC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.615</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/PASSAN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/ANTSPR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.635</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/POOGRA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/AMPBIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/AMMSAV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.728</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03<sup> a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/SPIPAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.359</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/STUNEG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/ZENASI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/AIMRUF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.272</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/CALSQU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/ZONLEU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/MOLATE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.588</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/AIMBOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.472</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/CARMEX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMMBAI/MELLIN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.459</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a: Associations with values of p ≤ 0.05 are significant.</p><p>This suggests establishing training programs for owners of pastures and promotes appropriate use by exten- sive cattle raising, where better grass produces best cattle and represents best habitat for obligate grassland bird species.</p><p>In addition to suggesting continue with these studies using the same methodology, it should be added the pos- sibility to quantify the availability of seed on the ground, to better explain these results.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.45105-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoekstra, J.M., Boucher, T.M., Ricketts, T.H. and Roberts, C. (2005) Confronting a Biome Crisis: Global Disparities of Habitat Loss and Protection. Ecology Letters, 8, 23-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E., Fallon, J., Pardieck, K.L., Ziolkowski, D.J. and Link, W.A. (2011) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2010, version 12.07.2011. US Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brennan, L.A. and Kuvlesky, W.P. (2005) North American Grassland Birds: An Unfolding Conservation Crisis? Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069%3C0001:nagbau%3E2.0.co;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pool, B.D., Panjabi, A., Macias-Duarte, A. and Soljhem, D. (2014) Rapid Expansion of Croplands in Chihuahua, Mexico Threatens Declining North American Grassland Bird Species. Biological Conservation, 170, 274-281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">CEC and TNC (2005) North American central grasslands priority conservation areas: technical report and documentation. In: Karl, J.W. and Hoth, J., Eds., Commission for Environmental Cooperation and The Nature Conservancy, Montreal, Quebec.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berlanga, H., Kennedy, J.A, Rich, T.D., Arizmendi, M.C., Beardmore, C.J., Blancher, P.J., Butcher, G.S., Couturier, A.R., Dayer, A.A, Demarest, D.W., Easton, W.E., Gustafson, M., Iigo-Elias, E., Krebs, E.A, Panjabi, A.O., Rodriguez-Contreras, V., Rosenberg, K.V., Ruth, J.M., Santana-Castellon, E., Vidal, R.Ma. and Will, T. (2010) Conservando a Nuestras aves compartidas: la vision trinacional de Compaeros en Vuelo para la conservación de las aves terrestres. Cornell Lab. of Ornithology: Ithaca, N.Y. USA, 49 pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dechant, J.A., Sondreal, M.L., Johnson, D.H., Igl, L.D., Goldade, C.M., Nenneman, M.P. and Euliss, B.R. (2003) Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds: Baird’s Sparrow. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Curtin, C., Sayre, N. and Lane, B. (2002) Transformations of the Chihuahuan Borderlans: Grazing, Fragmentation and Conservation in Desert Grasslands. Enviromental Science &amp; Policy, 5, 55-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1462-9011(02)00020-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahlering, M.A., Johnson, D.H. and Faaborg, J. (2009) Factors Associated with Arrival Densities of Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum) and Baird’s Sparrow (A. bairdii) in the Upper Great Plains. The Auk, 126, 799-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/auk.2009.08154</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez-Guerrero, J.H., Wehenkel, C., Pereda, M.E., Panjabi, A., Levandoski, G., Corral, R. Diaz, J. and Hernández, J. (2011) Abundancia y distribución invernal de Ammodramus bairdii, en la región de cuchillas de la zarca, México. Hutzil, Revista Mexicana de Ornitología, 12, 9-14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levandoski, G., Panjabi, A. and Sparks, R. (2008) Wintering Bird Inventory and Monitoring in Priority Conservation Areas in Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands in Mexico: 2008 results. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, Final Technical Report I-MXPLAT-TNC08-02.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fisher, J.R. and Davis, S.K. (2010) From Wiens to Robel: A Review of Grassland-bird Habitat Selection. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 265-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2009-020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panjabi, A., Youngberg, E. and Levandoski, G. (2010) Wintering Grassland Bird Density in Chihuahuan Desert Grassland Priority Conservation Areas, 2007-2010. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, RMBO Technical Report I-MXPLAT-08-03. 83 pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macias-Duarte, A. and Panjabi, A. (2013) Association of Habitat Characteristics with Winter Survival of a Declining Grassland Bird in Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands of Mexico. The Auk, 130, 141-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.12047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grzybowski, J. A. (1983) Sociality of Grassland Birds During winter. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13, 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00299925</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Desmond, M.J., Mendez-Gonzalez, C. and Abbott, L.B. (2008) Winter Diets and Seed Selection of Granivorous Birds in Southwestern New Mexico. In: Ruth, J.M., Brush, T. and Krueper, D.J., Eds., Birds of the US-Mexico Borderlands: Distribution, Ecology, and Conservation, Studies of Avian Biology, 37, 101-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knopf, F.L. (1994) Avian Assemblages on Altered Grasslands. Studies of Avian Biology, 15, 247-257</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vickery, P.D. and Herkert, J.R. (2001) Recent Advances in Grassland Bird Research: Where Do We Go from Here? The Auk, 118, 11-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0011:raigbr]2.0.co;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rzedowski, J. (1981) Vegetación de México. LIMUSA. México.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panjabi, A., Levandoski, G., and Sparks, R. (2007) Wintering Bird Inventory and Monitoring in Priority Conservation Areas in Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands in Mexico: 2007 pilot results. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO. Final Technical report I-MXPLAT-TNC07-02. 54 pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pyle</surname><given-names> P. and DeSante</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> D.F. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>Four-Letter and Six-Letter Alpha Codes for Birds Recorded from the American Ornithologists’ Union Check-List Area</article-title><source> North American Bird Bander</source><volume> 28</volume>,<fpage> 64</fpage>-<lpage>79</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Legendré, P. (2005) Species Associations: The Kendall Coefficient of Concordance Revisited. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 10, 226-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/108571105x46642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siegel, S. and Castellan Jr., N.J. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition, McGrawHill, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662168901300212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zar, H.J. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manly, B.F.J. (1997) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wehenkel, C., Bergmann, F. and Gregorius, H.R. (2007) Interactions between Genetic Structures and Species Composition in Forest Tree Communities. Silvae Genetica 56, 3-4, 101-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macias-Duarte, A., Panjabi, A., Pool, D., Youngberg, E. and Levandoski, G. (2011) Wintering Grassland Bird Density in Chihuahuan Desert Grassland Priority Conservation Areas, 2007-2011. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, RMBO Technical Report I-MXPLAT-10-01, 164 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordon, C.E. (2000) Movement Patterns of Wintering Sparrows in Arizona. The Auk, 117, 748-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4089599</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mendez-Gonzalez, C. (2010) Influence of Seed Resources on the Diet, Seed Selection and Community Dynamics of Wintering Birds in Semi-Arid Grasslands. Ph.D. Thesis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lanyon, W.E. (1995) Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna). In: Poole, A., Ed., The Birds of North America Online, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://dx.doi.org/10.2173/bna.160</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davis, S.K. (2004) Area Sensitivity in Grassland Passerines: Effects of Patch Size, Patch Shape and Vegetation Structure on Bird Abundance and Occurrence in Southern Saskatchewan. The Auk, 121, 1130-1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4090481</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez-Guerrero, J.H., Wehenkel, C., Pereda, M.E., Corral, J.J., Rosales, F. and Herrera, H. (2010) Measuring Associations between Granivorous grassland Birds Species and between the Bird Species and Winter Habitat in Northwestern Mexico. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 5, 713-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/rjbsci.2010.713.721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Martinez-Guerrero</surname><given-names> J.H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Wehenkel</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Pereda-Solis</surname><given-names> M.E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Panjabi</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Levandoski</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Corral-Rivas</surname><given-names> J. and DiazMoreno</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> R. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Relationships between Ammodramus bairdii, Audubon 1844, Soil Cover and Attributes of Winter Vegetation in Northwestern Mexico</article-title><source> Agrociencia</source><volume> 45</volume>,<fpage> 443</fpage>-<lpage>451</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ginter, D.L. and Desmond, M.J. (2005) Influence of Foraging and Roosting Behavior on Home-Range Size and Movement Patterns of Savannah Sparrows wintering in South Texas. Wilson Bulletin, 117, 63-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1676/04-017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wheelwright, N.T. and Rising, J.D. (2008) Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). In: Poole, A., Ed., The Birds of North America Online, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Vickery, P.D. (1996) Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum). In: Poole, A., Ed., The Birds of North America Online, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/239</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunne, P. (2006) Pete Dunne’s Essential Field Guide Companion. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45105-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koper, N., Walker, D.J. and Champagne, J. (2009) Nonlinear Effects of Distance to Habitat Edge on Sprague’s Pipits in Southern Alberta, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1287-1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9375-3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>