Introduction: Left Ventricle Postinfarction Pseudoaneurysm (LVPS)—false aneurysm occurs after a free-wall rupture contained by the adjacent pericardium. LVPS lacks the normal structure of the ventricular wall and disrupts the normal chamber anatomy. However, the natural history, clinical presentation and surgical outcome are still unclear. For that reason, it is necessary to describe the most relevant anatomical characteristics of LVPS and the appropriate surgical strategies currently applied. Methods: We reviewed the anatomical characteristics of several patients diagnosed of LVPS and the surgical technique performed. In this work two different anatomical types of LVPS are described in detail, with the surgical and structural implications for left ventricle reconstruction. Results: There are two different anatomical forms of LVPS: 1) Typical pseudoaneurysm, with a small gateway neck between the Left Ventricle and the false aneurysm chamber (Figure 1(A)); 2) Atypical pseudoaneurysm, in which the anatomical defect is bigger, without well-defined edges, extends over a large segment of infarcted and thinned myocardial tissue. In both cases, the therapeutics targets and the surgical techniques used were directed to restore the normal geometry of Left Ventricle, keeping the optimal mitral valve function. Conclusions: The surgical key-step is to preserve or to remodel the ventricular chamber anatomy. This fact restores the ventricular geometry, not only removing the wall discontinuity that generated the pseudoaneurysm. Nevertheless, final prognosis depends on the underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy and mechanical complications, such us mitral regurgitation or ventricular septal defect.

Keywords:Ventricular Anatomy, Left Ventricle Pseudoaneurysm Surgical Treatment, Ventricular Remodelling, Restore of Left Ventricle, Morphology and Function of Left Ventricle, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Left ventricle (LV) is the principal systemic chamber of the heart and its anatomy is coupled to a high-pressure blood circuit physiology. LV wall presents an especial thickness due to its function [1] . Inside the chamber, we can distinguish two myocardial prominent points arranged in posterolateral and anteromedial position, which form the body of the papillary muscles. These muscular structures project multiple tendinous strings to the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets. Thereby, the normal mitral valve function depends on the ventricular integrity. According to Torrent-Guasp’s theory of myocardial band, the shortening of muscular fibres produces the LV contraction, with the characteristic helicoidally torsion pattern (base to apex direction) [2] . The ventricular geometry and the anatomic preservation of this chamber are essential aspects to ensure the optimal cardiac function.

LV pseudoaneurysm (LVPS—false aneurysm occurs, in most cases, as a result of a transmural myocardial infarction. The wall thinning, secondary to an extensive myocardial necrosis, suffers a subsequent dilatation of the damaged tissue that progresses with each systole. This fact can finally produce a free-wall rupture, in a few cases contained by the adjacent pericardium, which allows the formation of the pseudoaneurysm. Therefore, LVPS lacks the normal structure of the ventricular wall, but it is only contained by the epicardium-pericardium reaction. However, the natural history, clinical presentation and surgical outcome are still unclear due to the rarity of occurrence and the small series of patient analyzed. Nevertheless, it seems to be clear that large LV pseudoaneurysm has a high risk of rupture and sudden death [3] [4] . We considerer that LV pseudoaneurysm should be undergo to surgical repair as soon as it is diagnosed, regardless of the patient’s symptoms [5] , maintaining the normal anatomy of LV chamber.

We reviewed the anatomical characteristics of several patients diagnosed of postinfarction left ventricle pseudoaneurysm (LVPS) and the surgical technique performed. To illustrate the surgical features of the anatomical types, we describe two cases well differenced. There are two different anatomical forms of LVPS: 1) Typical pseudoaneurysm, with a small gateway neck between the LV and the false aneurysm chamber (Figure 1(A)); 2) Atypical pseudoaneurysm, in which the anatomical defect is bigger, without well-defined edges, extends over a large segment of infarcted and thinned myocardial tissue (Figure 1(B)). Both types of LVPS lack the normal structure of a ventricular wall. The free-wall rupture generates an abnormal communication through the endocardium and myocardium, contained by the overlying pericardium. Therefore, LVPS differs from the true ventricular aneurysm (TVA) because the TVA is considered a pathological dilatation of the ventricle, although keeping the normal disposition of the wall layers (Figure 2).

In all cases the surgical goal was the comprehensive treatment of the cardiomyopathy, preserving the optimal ventricular geometry.

The most frequent situation of postinfarction LV pseudoaneurysm is the posterior-inferior wall, because the acute rupture of the anterior or the lateral wall hardly ever is contended by the overlying pericardium [6] . We recommend opening the pericardium carefully due to the high risk of acute rupture. In all cases, the cardiac manipulation must be restricted to the indispensable areas to be effective for the CPB. Likewise, in the rare cases of anterior or lateral pseudoaneurysm, we prefer to use the femoral vessels before opening the chest.

When CPB is established, we need to separate the false aneurysm from the rest of pericardium tissue. Sometimes this issue is difficult because of the intense inflammatory reaction, otherwise essential to form the pseudoaneurysm. We consider that is not always necessary to induce cardiac arrest to repair the ventricular wall. So, in CPB, we open longitudinally the pseudoaneurysm, avoiding the resection of its wall. Afterward we try to identify the pseudoaneurysm neck. In a typical LVPS, we found a narrow neck. Sometimes the gateway edges are consistent enough, with optimal fibrous tissue, to support a directly repair based on a suture-line [4] (Figure 6(A)). Although it is possible, we suggest an approach directed to preserve the normal ventricular geometry, particularly

in posterior-inferior pseudoaneurysm. The direct repair in this location could modify, by the suture traction and the appropriate position of the papillary muscles, which could generate or increase mitral regurgitation (Figure 6(B)). Thus, we recommend a Dacron/PTFE wide patch in all cases (Figure 6(C)), avoiding the anatomy disruption and the papillary dislocation. This issue is especially important in pseudoaneurysms with a bigger neck, in which there is a lot of non-viable myocardial tissue [7] and it is necessary to restore the ventricular geometry. For that reason, the therapeutics targets and the surgical techniques used in TVA restoration are appropriated for the anatomical repair of the Left Ventricle Pseudoaneurysm.

The surgical goal is to preserve or to remodel the ventricular chamber anatomy. This fact normalizes the ventricular geometry, not only removing the wall discontinuity that generated the pseudoaneurysm. Then, it is useful to close the pseudoaneurysm walls over the patch and to use fibrin sealants between them to improve the haemostasis and the ventricular strain resistance. Final prognosis of these patients is conditioned by the underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy and mechanical complications, such as mitral regurgitation or ventricular septal defect. For this reason, we strongly recommend to treat all concomitants heart diseases whenever possible, including coronary revascularization and mitral regurgitation.

This study was supported by Virgen de las Nieves Hospital and Ramón y Cajal Hospital. All surgical procedures described in the manuscript were realized using the material equipment and drugs support of these institutions.