<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2014.55029</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-44249</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Rayleigh-Taylor Instability of Magnetized Plasma through Darcy Porous Medium
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>amal</surname><given-names>Abdallah Hoshoudy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, 
South Valley University, Kena, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>g_hoshoudy@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>03</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>186</fpage><lpage>197</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Effects of horizontal and vertical magnetic field components on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability of stratified incompressible plasmas layer of variable density through Darcy porous medium are studied. The basic magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) set of equations has been constructed and linearized. Then the linear normalized growth rate is obtained analytically as a function of the physical parameters of the system considered. Numerical calculations have been performed to see the effects of various parameters on the normalized growth rate of Rayleigh-Taylor instability.(For more information,please refer to the PDF.) 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Rayleigh-Taylor Instability; Magnetized Plasmas; Darcy Porous Media</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The hydromagnetics stability of a magnetized plasma of varying density is of considerable importance in several astrophysical situations such as supernova explosions, in heating in solar corona, theories of sunspot magnetic fields, the formation and mixing of clouds and the stability of the stellar atmospheres in magnetic fields.</p><p>The classical study of the equilibrium of an incompressible, inviscid fluid of variable density was first undertaken by Rayleigh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref1">1</xref>] , and later applied to all accelerated fluids by Taylor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref2">2</xref>] . Rayleigh showed the equilibrium of a horizontal layer of incompressible, ideal fluid is stable or unstable according as the density increases or decreases anywhere in the vertically upward direction. Since then the problem is called Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI). RTI occurs naturally in many phenomenons of astrophysics, geophysics, and laboratories. It derives its character from the adverse density distribution of the matter, where the investigation of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in a magnetized plasma is a problem of considerable interest in space (ionospheric spread-F), fusion (curvature induced instabilities like interchange, ballooning, etc.) and the astrophysical plasmas.</p><p>Under various physical effects, the Rayleigh-Taylor instability problem of a finite layer of a fluid has been studied by several authors in hydrodynamics and in magnetohydrodynamics domain; the stabilizing effect of magnetic field on RTI problem for an incompressible plasma has been demonstrated by Kruskal and Schwarzschild [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref3">3</xref>] for a horizontal orientation of the magnetic field and by Hide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref4">4</xref>] for a vertical orientation. The effects of viscosity and compressibility on the RTI of stratified plasma in the presence of magnetic field have been studied by Bhatia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref5">5</xref>] . The RTI in a rotating plasma of variable density including simultaneously the effects of viscosity and the finiteness of the ion Larmor radius have been investigated by Bhatia and Steiner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref6">6</xref>] . The effect of Hall current and finite electrical resistivity on the RTI of viscous, incompressible, finitely conducting plasma in a downward gravitational field under the influence of a uniform magnetic field normal to gravity has been studied by Kamla and Srivastav [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref7">7</xref>] . The RTI of an infinitely conducting stratified dusty plasma medium including the effects of FLR corrections in the presence of a horizontal magnetic field has been studied by Kamal and Chhajlani [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref8">8</xref>] . The RTI of a plasma layer in the presence of a horizontal magnetic field is investigated, taking into account the effects of Hall-currents and an arbitrarily large density gradient by Donald [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref9">9</xref>] . The effects of Hall currents and viscosity on the RTI of an incompressible infinitely conducting stratified plasma permeated by a two-dimensional horizontal magnetic field have been investigated by Ahsan and Bhatia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref10">10</xref>] . The effects of Hall currents on the RTI of a finitely conducting stratified partially ionized plasma, where the plasma is permeated by a two dimensional horizontal magnetic field have been studied by Aiyub and Bhatia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref11">11</xref>] . In the presence of magnitude of the gravitational acceleration, the RTI of stratified incompressible plasma has been studied by Goldston and Rutherford [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref12">12</xref>] . The RTI in the presence of horizontal magnetic field of incompressible plasma has been studied by Wu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>The RTI of magnetized plasma through porous medium problem has a great scientific interest, where this problem corresponds physically (in astrophysics) to the Rayleigh-Taylor instability of an equatorial section of a planetary magnetosphere or of a stellar atmosphere where the magnetic field is perpendicular or parallels to gravity. So, the RTI of a stratified plasma through porous medium in the presence or absence of magnetic field has been studied by a number of researchers (Chhajlani and Vaghela, Vyas and Chhajlani, Sharma and Bhardwaj, Sharma and Sharma, Sharma and Trilok, Sharma and Sunil, Shikha and Bhatia, Opara, Sharma and Sunil, Sunil and Sharma, Sharma and Thakur and Sharma and Rajput). In this case (Darcy’s model), the usual viscous term in the equation of motion is replaced by the resistive term<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\dad35105-dd9e-4674-bc35-7224fe84fb22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\13f8cfe6-f61c-43cf-926f-3a9ae4bd9549.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the fluid viscosity, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\2cc289a1-c810-49db-a3f8-b10047bc2372.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the medium permeability and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\1cd46626-ec3a-49dd-abd7-00d536ce2b01.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Darcian (filter) velocity of the fluid.</p><p>In all the above-mentioned studies, the behaviour of growth rates is considered with respect to the porosity of porous medium and the medium permeability in the presence of an variable magnetic field in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\45de38f0-e228-4c1f-8f64-53f68de33c11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>direction only or in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\391568be-7e6b-4c4c-9ecc-978b26f222c5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>direction only. Here, we will discuss the role of resistive term (Darcy’s term) besides the components of magnetic field in both <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\311c4fbb-3b30-4859-b092-01fdd7bd4258.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\42a622b7-b264-4b55-9950-098cb9459729.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>direction on growth rates of RTI of plasma layer</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Formulation of the Problem</title><p>We consider the strata of incompressible and inviscous plasma as a fluid of electrons and immobile ions through Darcy porous medium in the presence of magnetic field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\75ad73ef-a9d1-42bc-acaf-0cd3edf7a341.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where the relevant equations may be written, respectively (see references [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref12">12</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref25">25</xref>] ),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100489"><label>, (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\de9468f7-d44a-4024-9efb-95a817649863.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100490"><label>, (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\de53b1e7-429a-419c-bf9b-0be274a9cbf4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100491"><label>. (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\3109d370-5b02-485b-903e-9617b8ff88cc.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For incompressible flow the fluid elements move without changing density is to say that the Lagrangian total derivative of density is zero, that is (see reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref1">1</xref>] )</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100492"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\1fd06d21-9991-4ac9-8d3c-9a3742335c7b.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\9ef413a1-1371-4479-91e8-9bdd7e79d589.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the velocity of the fluid, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\8de5e1a2-a0c7-4a87-aa9b-25d53253ccd7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the density, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\e32cf52b-1821-4fc2-953e-bf39a1580d12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>thermal pressure, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\6eeeef80-ca1f-49a1-ab9e-2eddad6a8fd1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>magnetic permeability, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\1b200c3c-7a9f-49c7-a21c-9ece345b8dfc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>coefficient of dynamic viscosity and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\75b11a0c-874c-452d-806f-7dcf706c80fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the gravitational acceleration.</p><p>One can see that the set of Equations (1)-(4) is complete for describing the magnetic field effects on the R-T instability of incompressible plasma, since its number of equations exactly equals its number of unknown quantities: Two unknown vector quantities <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ad996950-b041-49d8-9409-3279967dc2a2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\63e0b823-c030-4d43-9556-31aca4fa8d2a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and two unknown scalar quantities <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\1e67d07a-a1fe-4658-9d13-22320997866f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\0d46663f-3b90-44c0-95b6-381c2e9ed93a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For the equilibrium profiles can be expressed in the form <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\b57c2239-e1b2-4258-893a-d5561f65bf88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4d8ac8b0-c5ff-43d1-b63b-177914cee4c6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Now, we assume a small perturbation in the system of Equations (1)-(4), where the perturbations in the velocity<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\5139a6b0-d7fe-4674-9632-1374ce10a5f3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, pressure<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ca311ca3-edd1-466e-8a9f-0382e1245326.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, magnetic field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\5a90435e-3f8d-4415-9a79-f4a27d305feb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and density<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\9dab7d7d-c464-40aa-bf90-1bc1082c10a6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively, are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\c34bbf31-1357-433b-8641-1a2ce1ecb586.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\f25a8c64-2ff6-47ad-80fe-8857a76d169d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\7e9f232b-a7b1-4fa3-a9ae-e021c3007278.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d2362866-8a7e-4de8-a736-7ce0b31ac13f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, the linearized equations can be easily derived from Equations (1)-(4) in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100493"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\89d7400b-0d5b-458d-8045-65183b2d9189.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100494"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\311e384d-db95-4f14-9a2e-cb79eb66aab7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100495"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\3c4ffefd-e966-49ca-923d-d08d4a5e25da.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100496"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\6b240719-f503-4ffa-b588-23d83a9d00a4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4040d1ec-756c-4253-9b52-827265f20f7e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\200ad9b4-b48c-4682-b52e-11550dacd227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4b3cbd36-9957-4c37-8f7e-8b8a6f23c58e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and the fluid is arranged in horizontal strata, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\92b5f5b8-3b5d-4ceb-a3f5-910f297c9bb1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a function of the vertical coordinate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\99c19592-54b5-44db-92e6-3c174904bdd2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> only (i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\5b3c8af9-a27d-42a2-a97f-a60a337f5b56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\fd3a2193-d2c7-4b55-8ef1-144606662046.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then the system of Equations (4)-(8) become</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100497"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\bc8cba61-33ae-4102-b4e3-916d222698bb.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100498"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\0fdcbcfb-16f3-49e3-9f36-06666f58ede0.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100499"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\f1da224f-ca24-452d-acb9-62167af13ed0.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100500"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\d54f0dc3-3c6f-4e93-8e7c-27046886ad71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100501"><label>, (13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\a2c91d69-fa7d-41cf-9bb5-a77ab31dfdfa.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100502"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\a1fac929-4297-42c9-aa32-ebc031b0e4fc.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we assume that the perturbation in any physical quantity takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100503"><label>, (15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\3a61995a-6f25-477c-8c93-d1d9852fd8dd.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ade9c184-a3d8-4c6c-8eef-b2a31a641f52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\363510e0-9fde-4a63-8f5d-93dbd4c9ed2f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are horizontal components of the wave-number vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ea7212bd-517b-4b29-acd4-ead3ef9c186e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\7bd5afe6-7e94-496a-b998-079df4ae63b6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ecbfba32-c70c-4777-90b8-48a1e22e95b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (may be complex<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\859b5514-1ce1-4841-a97a-8dc603e5597e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) is the frequency of perturbations or the rate at which the system departs from equilibrium thee initial state. Using the expression (15) in the system of Equations (9)-(14), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100504"><label>, (16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\3e8fcb8c-e35e-49ec-9543-3333281432ba.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100505"><label>, (17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\3ed89f40-eda6-48a0-82c2-d9b53de7b26f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100506"><label>, (18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\24a956e5-f0aa-46d4-a36c-6056d64ed443.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100507"><label>, (19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\da4b5511-2f97-4f52-acef-6ec462128495.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100508"><label>, (20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\c285327f-2fcb-4bd9-a4f3-0ccb29dd0274.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100509"><label>, (21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\3f90e169-6527-4853-b7f3-19369bcb82ae.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, if we eliminate some of the variables from the system of Equations (16)-(21), we have a differential equation in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\42708472-191b-4085-897f-f5ff211ea2e2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100510"><label>, (22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\73bc84c7-f485-4ffc-ad43-a166e7257b29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7501683x\9f3ac9e9-36d8-4d9e-b7f7-e6b0e0a9f340.png" /></p><p>(23)</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. A Continuously Stratified Plasma</title><p>In this section we consider the case of incompressible continuously stratified plasma layer of thickness <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d5018db0-db0f-461b-8484-185e332702bd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> confined between two rigid boundaries, in which the density and magnetic field distribution are given, respectively, by</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\f29058c5-4070-4b2c-885d-d45df42c459e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\0039bac8-af03-43dc-9d39-637b6ad17139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\82c3c9c1-48c1-4453-8de5-28c032104e0f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\cd48e980-18d0-4658-b10c-3ac8a38b3673.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\51252502-4894-4db3-9165-863b5807ddbe.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\460038ba-0e37-496f-b788-bae1a568b02d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\e250251f-eaf6-4122-8ef2-5393729606f3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (the density-scale length) are constants, then Equation (22) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100511"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\1b2eb7b5-fccd-42cc-86a0-b794a163109a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d9b7dd73-1fb5-4e6e-a1cd-8f02ee62b553.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\dafab3d0-8dd8-4a8d-b47c-39d918befc7e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are Alfv&#233;n velocity.</p><p>Now, if we choose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ecd059b0-9f5b-4e94-befa-a247f84a8711.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the form <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ac89097d-767c-4ec2-ab0f-79a6b18cad7b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and by substituting in Equation (24), we will have an equation in both <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\2a4c3255-4763-45f5-b1aa-db761aeef1aa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\532a7156-f3ef-4946-ad7e-4a99f206d0b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then coefficients both <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\c4c972a5-9233-4d75-b888-09e1a4e59456.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\52ed2746-797e-47c9-9c77-ccb0e3cf8969.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively, are given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100512"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\d999cfd0-e403-48d6-81c0-a2e58d0cbc74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100513"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\9b0bf0fd-d72a-4c80-ba5a-2af4340cf089.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we define the dimensionless quantities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100514"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\f3cc43ba-3139-4d71-bb15-65be382e0dca.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then Equations (25) and (26), respectively, take the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100515"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\76b01cd4-e2a1-4319-906a-9c503f5f193c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100516"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\5076ece6-26ea-4caf-9183-599842612793.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we put <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\585165ce-29a6-4a90-aa84-14a152d23d19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\8f6a49a3-a12d-48fc-96f8-b3d252bfb942.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (stable oscillations), then Equations (28) and (29) may be given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100517"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\5fe21286-8eea-428b-9f02-13c753510280.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100518"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\ae8a0f79-2e2d-460b-8822-91f16af8d0b5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, if we rearrange the above two equations (Equations (30) and (31)), we will have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100519"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\1d401a97-b572-4076-9ebb-2042e5501459.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100520"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\bcb0b83b-4ff3-4120-a99e-cfc8b1b8d5ad.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From Equations (32) and (33) maybe we can specialize the next special cases:</p><p>(i) In the case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\a4479e65-a625-46f2-9018-687acac43226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\2e9717bb-abf2-499b-a4ce-2a7825d6c4b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\98eae95d-efa4-4a97-8482-06a502f540d6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>From Equation (33) we get<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4e92936d-1e10-406b-b3a9-320b007283c9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and substituting in Equation (32) we find that the normalized growth rate given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100521"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\72f25d72-3a8e-4291-bc0b-9b3772e9b7ac.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This case is considered by Goldston and Rutherford (see reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref12">12</xref>] ).</p><p>(ii) In the case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\194b1e0c-dae8-4d4f-89ec-4f2cd63242f1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\3c646fe7-c27c-4fff-877c-9e6f57697b07.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\c9abcce1-5c58-467d-9e77-ad423d1e3886.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>A second time, from Equation (33) we get<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\303a6a89-ac79-4dd2-be27-5e423387a256.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and substituting in Equation (32), then the normalized growth rate given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100522"><label>. (35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\edaf56f6-d7a0-468a-9c15-fc385b229027.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This case studied in reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.44249-ref12">12</xref>] . It is clarified that, the horizontal magnetic field has stabilizing effect on RTI problem. This influence is obvious from Equations (34) and (35), where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\3a11d361-b0ff-4c09-a8d7-74ed1dc69778.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>(iii) In the case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\238d7761-0100-4dae-b8cb-8ae21183b383.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\690b91ac-689f-4805-9126-8dbeb5f7401e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\fe78e258-2876-4406-9efe-3b62ef4849c1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>A third time, from Equation (33) we get<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d14f615d-13dd-4ca3-8ab7-768dbdfa2520.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and substituting in Equation (32), the normalized growth rate given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100523"><label>. (36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\293e7fee-cbed-4ced-b01f-0ec1eec9180d.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, comparing between Equations (34) and (36), someone can observe that, the stabilizing role for the vertical magnetic field on the considerable system, where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\98497940-8af0-4308-8b3c-8f004040f396.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>(iv) In the case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\38e7a081-2d48-4bad-bf7d-730a2bdacef1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\97a1b2cd-4a38-4d42-92ad-b8ae02b30af7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ecadb6a5-157d-479b-930d-cee029383ac5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>A fourth time, from Equation (33) we get<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\9a057eaf-998b-46fb-90d5-941bd146af0b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and substituting in Equation (32), the dispersion rate given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100524"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\017ace6f-0025-4faf-ba1f-04fda15870cf.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then, the normalized growth rate becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100525"><label>. (38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\9d1d00d2-bfaa-4194-94b0-d692a3c65e92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From Equations (34) and (38) it is very clear that,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\353a0dc4-6b74-419b-82d7-54fd0a016d12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The stabilizing effects of the horizontal, vertical magnetic and resistive term, unaccompanied, (above cases (i)-(iv)) on the RTI have been numerically presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>(v) For the general case (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\36fa8e87-efb7-4935-83a1-d1a626a2408b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\96b4fdc0-806a-45a2-bf74-a76983845c1c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), if we eliminate the term <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\bacb45a7-142c-415f-88f6-3571f36e7b56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> between Equations (32) and (33) the normalized dispersion relation takes in the form.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100526"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\a158e76b-e93f-4f28-8dda-0e0cee68798c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this case the normalized growth rate given as.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100527"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\0e97fb05-0461-4294-ab33-b3bde7084c06.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100528"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\986c474f-9c07-4d70-9d79-4d22faefadde.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100529"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\4b9a299b-f624-4229-a845-50610c154b63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100530"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\0f55b87d-900e-40f8-8693-1e2c558a2dd5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In fact, the square of normalized growth rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\0fed914a-877d-4141-a602-faee90da3648.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Equation (40) is a function in the dimensionless quantities of horizontal <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\cb453327-5309-4850-a1d1-39bf1574249c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and vertical <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\41fa0a07-29ed-439f-b08d-e4225107f79e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> components of the magnetic field, the dimensionless resistive term<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\41da7c1b-35a1-4381-a77a-872bce164090.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, dimensionless Darcy term<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\38d24cca-a5e5-46a1-a838-c6f9fb337eab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the wave number <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\3398c594-f8d9-46fb-b992-77bbcbf0dd7e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4279e30d-e967-4e55-8f8d-d789f9d33506.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\2008e04e-930b-4f5e-8547-96c85637b7b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d4d412d8-f5cd-4b93-950c-64063fe8c49e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\59528c82-f81b-494d-beba-ffe250ebeb26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the density-scale length). The dimensionless quantities<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d1bb1103-c356-4ea8-886d-880100d6c2d4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\f95dac36-5351-49f0-89b9-79a009d1ee5d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d44ed6a5-66cd-4e13-bf6f-32f0b99942c2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the parameters of problem that maybe take a different values. But the constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d6d60d8a-0ee3-4881-b1a4-046fb4b87c66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is unknown in the general case (v), while in the absence of magnetic field or in the presence of either them (horizontal or vertical magnetic field components) we note that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\d19f2584-4197-43db-8af1-df998c2de136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (special cases (i)-(iv)). So, firstly we will discuss the role of constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\a49e6d41-a691-477b-91f1-834e2a26d867.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the square of normalized growth rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\565c9ea1-272b-48d9-a363-bf668bd24894.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the presence of horizontal, vertical magnetic field components and resistive term.</p><p>The role of constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\dfad294a-dd7e-4359-8c32-c303137c24a1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the presence of both horizontal and vertical magnetic field components</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4169f926-ef60-4c99-8243-15960d55da33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and resistive term <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\611e2f8b-8a49-444d-8fac-e61bd9bd686e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, where the square normalized growth</p><p>rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\e95c4483-dd80-4a09-988e-af4b5847185c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is plotted against <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\3d8dbcad-2a33-46b2-ab74-9c1762d251c9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\23ca2268-877e-480d-ba85-f4abcfaf914e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\2e1fcc8d-b293-42c6-b6f0-3457d92f2627.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For the values <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\1381326d-09e2-4374-a0eb-c4e1fdbf9aa8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that is less than<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\24e4948a-0239-4226-a200-213893c254dd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one can see that, the magnitude of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\a87029e5-6a97-4a77-a9e2-f1a4a80a92ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> decrease with decreasing of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\fc409748-0037-4d95-afbf-01a7cc3448b6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For the values <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ad192673-65ca-4487-96d6-baf67d229565.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>that is greater than <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\6c3b2a97-c764-453b-a2e5-2fb660dc229a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the magnitude of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\207247ec-9d18-49c3-92a7-e369fdb9e690.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> decrease while the magnitude of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\ea701c0b-46f4-4f90-9b71-8173dc165615.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases. These implies that the maximum instability in the presence of both horizontal and vertical components of magnetic field happens at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\b117ef07-1291-4878-b7e3-57bc81a6a104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (in the presence or absence of resistive term).</p><p>The general case (Equation (40)), that gives the effects of horizontal, vertical magnetic field and resistive term together on the instability of the considered system has been presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. where the square normalized growth rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\5615c87c-4def-4c76-9f9e-ca2ca2be4ce0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is plotted against the square normalized wave number <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\a75b1658-0d03-403d-b042-4ebead8ca5e0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\611f9fb8-890a-453a-b341-f75523df0f24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\966327df-4a78-4254-8e03-2443cf986169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and for different values of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\f0aae694-2831-4097-a1f1-2656bfc903a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Second time, one can see that, the maximum instability (maximum square normalized growth rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\e51819e4-d8c8-46ba-95f9-441a46fafc5b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) happens at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\f7915622-40e5-447b-ae29-000267a52883.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4452f05d-6637-4425-9550-ada0219c5648.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the magnitudes of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\a8c0f04c-8e04-4f46-8311-c5a39ffc4c88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are less than their counterpart at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\f15edafc-e7fb-4314-89cc-18cbefedc094.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Also, the magnitudes of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\04eb4f7e-6c10-434a-be91-be3da3d899b8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\8138e2ac-d789-41d0-9056-a8425b307a17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are less than their counterpart at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\154ed0c6-3f7c-462a-a10c-2a05838a4508.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreover the magnitudes of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\b6e87805-7f3b-40f2-a18b-5af75f36c7a3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\bd6fa855-2c56-4242-bbed-7b664537c812.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are less than their counterpart at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\46f536f2-3a23-490c-81d6-866e063bb352.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In the case <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\e42cec7f-ce5b-42e4-8871-dbfaed3555f1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (maximum instability) the system of Equations (39)-(43) take the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100531"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\9108f2b8-88cb-49ee-941c-7c7ae22dc172.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the maximum normalized growth rate gives by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.44249-formula100532"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7501683x\329841b6-93d4-4f9a-b574-680c7ef84af5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> Shows the role of constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\da796888-dade-408f-ad28-22ee1b3cc09d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where the maximum happens at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4a74ca7a-1494-4df9-928a-f0e4716245b5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If we move</p><p>toward the point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\3e298031-803b-4d6a-96c3-bedc1ed9d807.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from the right or left hand the system moves toward instability and vice versa if we move from the point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\47decae7-6728-4166-b6ce-81e41451fc2a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the left or right hand, the system tends to stability.</p><p>In closing this paper, the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in stratified plasma in the presence of combined effect of horizontal and vertical magnetic field through Darcy porous medium is considered. The solution of the system leads to a dispersion relation where the physical parameters are put in the dimensionless form. Some special cases are particularized to explain the roles that play the variables of the problem and numerical solutions are made. Some stability diagrams are plotted and discussed. The results show that, as the growth rate depends on the horizontal and vertical components of magnetic field and resistive term (Darcy’s term) also depends on the parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\dad7d72d-871e-4e77-81fc-228b4f9759af.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Numerically the maximum instability (normalized growth rate) happens at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\deb01cf4-4f0e-41d4-aff3-69d55899937e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and then analytically the maximum instability gives in Equation (45). The system will be more stable if we select <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\cfae88e3-1de5-43c0-88b2-5915f19f89d7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that to be different than −0.5. Finally, for the behavior of our selected system with respect to the parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7501683x\4eedd659-fff0-428f-ba49-c54367d68449.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have not clear interpreting at this stage.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.44249-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rayleigh, L. (1882) Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 14, 170-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-14.1.170</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, G.I. (1950) Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series A, 201, 192-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1950.0052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruskal, M. and Schwarzschild, M. (1954) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 223, 348-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1954.0120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hide, R. (1955) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 233, 376-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhatia, P.K. (1974) Astrophysics and Space Science, 26, 319-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00645614</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhatia, P.K. and Steiner, J.M. (1975) Astrophysics and Space Science, 34, 459-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00644812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abani, K. and Srivastav, K.M. (1975) Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11, 26, 419-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02738570</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanghvi, R.K. and Chhajlani, R.K. (1987) Astrophysics and Space Science, 132, 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00637781</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Donald Ariel, P. (1991) Astrophysics and Space Science, 184, 205-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00642969</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, A. and Bhatia, P.K. (1993) Physica Scripta, 47, 567-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/47/4/016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, A. and Bhatia, P.K. (1993) Physica Scripta, 48, 607-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/48/5/017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldston, R.J. and Rutherford, P.H. (1995) Introduction to Plasma Physics Institute of Physics, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781439822074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Z., Zhang, W., Li, D. and Yang, W. (2004) Chinese Physics Letters, 21, 2001-2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/21/10/038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vyas, M.K. and Chhajlani, R.K. (1988) Astrophysics and Space Science, 140, 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00643533</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Bhardwaj, V.K. (1990) Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 40, 753-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01606015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Sharma, Y.D. (1989) Astrophysics and Space Science, 155, 295-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00643865</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Chand, T. (1989) Astrophysics and Space Science, 155, 301-310.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Sunil (1992) Astrophysics and Space Science, 194, 303-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00643999</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oza, S. and Bhatia, P.K. (1993) Astrophysics and Space Science, 199, 279-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00613201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Opara, F.E. (1994) Astrophysics and Space Science, 213, 197-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00658210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Sunil (1994) Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 44, 927-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01715486</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Sunil (1995) Physics of Plasmas, 2, 1886-1892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.871275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sunil and Sharma, Y.D. (1996) Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 35, 221-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03602559608000580</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Thakur, K.P. (1982) International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 5, 365-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0161171282000350</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.44249-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.C. and Rajput, A. (1992) Astrophysics and Space Science, 187, 105-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00642690</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>