<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JQIS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Quantum Information Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5751</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jqis.2014.41007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JQIS-43872</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Some Features on Entropy Squeezing for Two-Level System with a New Nonlinear Coherent State
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alama</surname><given-names>I. Ali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sayed</surname><given-names>Abdel-Khalek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azher University, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>salama5laser@yahoo.com(AIA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Entropy squeezing is an important feature in performing different tasks in quantum information processing such as quantum cryptography and superdense coding. These quantum information tasks depend on finding the states in which squeezing can be created. In this article, a new feature on entropy squeezing for a two level system with a class of nonlinear coherent state (NCS) is observed. An interesting result on the comparison between the coherent state (CS) and NCS is explored. The influence of the Lamb-Dick parameter in both absence and presence of the Kerr medium is examined. A rich feature of entropy squeezing in the case of NCS, which is observed to describe the motion of the trapped ion, has been obtained. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Entropy Squeezing; Kerr-Like Medium; Nonlinear Coherent State</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is known that quantum entangled state plays an important role in the fields of quantum information theory as well as quantum teleportation and computation. The entropy which automatically includes all moments of the density operator has been shown to be a very useful operational measure of the purity of the quantum state. The most important and interesting work to understand relation between entropy and information was done by Shannon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref1">1</xref>] , who introduced the entropy (Shannon entropy) into communications theory. Recently it has been shown that nonlinear coherent states are useful in the description of the motion of a trapped ion and various non-classical properties of such states have also been studied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref2">2</xref>] . We note that in Refs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref2">2</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref3">3</xref>] nonlinear coherent states have been defined as the right eigenstate of a generalized annihilation operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1e8223a1-668f-4170-9580-5a20444ebe00.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (which emerges from the Hamiltonian describing the dynamics) this is because in the case of nonlinear algebras the commutator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\779d46e6-14e9-4eec-ba92-2385f8a11020.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is not a constant or a linear function of the generators of the algebra but nonlinear in the in the generators. As a consequence it is difficult to obtain an explicit form of nonlinear coherent state constructed via the displacement operator technique. The nonlinear coherent state (NCS) was introduced as a new state of the source of the coherent field to describe some of the non-classical properties like squeezing and Sub-Poissnian behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref4">4</xref>] . There are some previous studies on the entropy squeezing of a two-level atom, such as one photon transition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref5">5</xref>] , the nonlinear Kerr medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref6">6</xref>] and degenerate two-photon process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref7">7</xref>] . The authors of these papers have focused only on the initial coherent state of the field.</p><p>Recently, much attention has been drawn to squeezing in an ensemble of atoms illuminated with light, involving quantum noise and atomic spin polarization measurement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref8">8</xref>] , and quantum-controlled few-photon states generated by squeezed atoms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref9">9</xref>] . These studies of atomic squeezing are based on the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (HUR), which is regarded as the standard limitation on measurements of quantum fluctuations. HUR is formulated in terms of the variances or standard deviations of the system observable. As an alternative to the HUR, Hirschman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref10">10</xref>] studied quantum uncertainty by using quantum entropy theory, and obtained an entropic uncertainty relation for position and momentum which can overcome the limitations of the HUR.</p><p>The entropy squeezing and variance squeezing for the entangled sate of a single two-level atom interacting with a single electromagnetic field in a squeezed vacuum a broad bandwidth are studied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref11">11</xref>] . Also, the similarities and differences of both reservoirs for the two different models have been explained through some calculations, such as the atomic inversion and the von Neumann entropy. It is to be noted that considering a mode structure plays a role like the squeezing parameter in the case of a squeezed vacuum reservoir. Also, the entropy squeezing of a two-level atom driven by a strong classical field and damped into a modeled reservoir with non-flat density of modes has been investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref12">12</xref>] . On the other hand, the dynamics of a single atom entropy squeezing of the two-qubit system, in the presence of local squeezed reservoirs, has been discussed. Our aim in the present paper is to investigate the entropy squeezing of a two level atom when the initial state of the field is taken to be NCS and discuss different features of entropy squeezing in the case of NCS. These features are connected with the Lamb-Dick parameter. Here we also examine the influence of a nonlinear medium and the detuning parameter on the squeezing parameter of the atomic operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\a9e38651-ca02-430f-97db-cc45740cd53b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\8e90ace5-cb9c-43df-b035-bdaa58b324ff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The organization of the paper is arranged as follows. In Section 2, we present a brief review of the Hamiltonian model and give an exact expression for the density matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\cd1ec2f8-1b9b-44e1-abb4-f4a47731d2ec.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In Section 3, we employ the density matrix to investigate the properties of the entropy squeezing. Finally, we give our discussion in Section 4.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Dynamics of One Photon JCM</title><p>In this paper, we focus our attention to a quantum optical model, where a single two-level atom via one photon process, interacts with a single quantized cavity mode of the radiation field. Then the Hamiltonian of the above system of interest may be written as</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\ec139601-89ff-4e2a-afbc-178ccaa84a53.png" /><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\999585d4-28d5-4b1c-aa4d-611dcfa9c241.png" /> (1)</p><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\51730a8d-cccb-4fa3-9855-b7ba1be32102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the field frequency, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\60370852-736d-4ccf-bf68-304952f6b851.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the atomic frequency, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\994f682f-dadf-46d9-b10c-eae8b73adbaa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3898cb89-aa24-4464-9b1d-8fff19d24b0c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the annihilation and the creation operators for the mode of the cavity field satisfying <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1409c4fe-ded1-4e6e-b13c-161fe2f0e060.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\999ccac8-5b79-4606-949d-f48a5f13931f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\50b7c614-c434-49b1-9810-8ecb68417910.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the atomic spin operators defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130786"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\f6bc5ed2-492c-4012-b206-1159129bae04.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b8b23e71-7c5b-42b4-8af3-9d4b96bd9337.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\d88bf5a7-01e9-44d4-86a9-b20218bfccf7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the upper and lower states of the atom, respectively and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\496c6596-037f-4000-a45c-de6d63e90745.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the effective coupling constant. Also, we denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\84b1fbab-266f-4e8e-8f3b-0218396598b8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the dispersive part of the third-order nonlinearity of the Kerr-like medium, with the detuning parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\7e45b7d0-0962-40eb-8ec9-7aa2e19bbd56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Therefore, we employ the unites of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\7f850e02-67ef-479b-98c1-3645dc16d832.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> The effective Hamiltonian can be written as</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\0db5b870-36f6-4d76-b222-73f1995f480f.png" /></p><p>where,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130787"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\26803791-cee0-419a-ad95-35cd6003814f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For convenience, we take, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\790dec89-8ffb-4596-9f6e-88e0e1da949e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\36a138cc-4aa5-4767-978f-6570ff42746f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and assume that the atom is initially in the superposition state<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\88f2f414-0e80-466a-965c-679d35aed75b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Also, we assume that the field is initially in the new nonlinear coherent state (NCS),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130788"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\ca4fac4d-7b1d-4718-a882-e6fb740a1616.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\d3339a1b-0675-45aa-ab4e-f6fbb9cb3cb4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the distribution function of the NCS. The NCS is defined as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\61fc9a77-a8cf-4648-97fa-24521fb39c96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> i.e., it is a coherent state (CS) corresponding to the second algebra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref13">13</xref>] . One can write <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\895ae7d0-3181-424a-ba04-b5de2aef570c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the following form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref4">4</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref13">13</xref>]</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\9ca91409-144d-456e-9a80-6e3abfd19b33.png" /></p><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\0b6e6d81-1f6a-4abb-a3bb-6f46b6a9f724.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a normalization constant, which can be determined from the condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\19941a72-83ba-470b-84b8-a831e9c914ea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and is given by</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\f1b61c7b-b78c-4d90-b418-98a272f79a7f.png" /></p><p>While <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\c72aea09-a403-480d-95e4-6d40ce5279fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the coefficients <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1fc9ba83-6d88-47e6-a603-b913e06be340.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> it is clear that for different choices of the nonlinearity function, we shall get different nonlinear coherent states. In the present case we choose a nonlinearity function, which has been used in the description of the motion of a trapped ion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\3a3605d6-e3ce-4782-bac4-7cde83074634.png" /></p><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\10bdd2b4-80ff-4fa9-ad3e-a1e56a3294d0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is known as the Lamb-Dick parameter and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\ac584178-90b6-4743-9cf8-594a750a59fe.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are generalized Lagurre polynomials given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130789"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\65200b9f-ce57-48c8-b70d-9833c3424ac7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Clearly <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\24bb1681-281f-4a0f-b96c-497065ee18bb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\182b82e3-5ddb-4222-a5da-8e91783019ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and in this case nonlinearity coherent states become the standard coherent states. However, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\dfbb4747-1872-4625-b28e-8696d257faba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> nonlinearity starts developing with degree of depending on the magnitude of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\87af678d-2ddc-42b3-a8e7-88e89e792100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref14">14</xref>] . Then the initial state of the atom-field coupling system reads as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130790"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\e02eccd9-f92b-404c-83ae-5461d644e591.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\8975a620-3272-407a-8e07-35a16752fd97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\df517af9-79b7-4088-9fc8-406fc3585ed8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\400327a5-bb24-45af-aa76-894777a7e294.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\117c329b-d313-44b9-9e7e-7867c3690525.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the initial coherence of the two-level atom and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\6ada5dbe-37ae-4f9f-9b00-1504d07e9b2f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the relative phase between the upper and lower states of the two-level atom. Thus the initial density operator of the system is given by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\a4fd6b8c-370e-42fd-880b-3eef9a1e99b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\357fbf59-398d-4c24-9682-fb4654945b25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f1cd9989-d7eb-4d85-acbf-1664b84ec4ae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\2686f838-d355-47c7-ae37-1dd92117c65f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>describes the initial values for the field-atom density operator.</p><p>At any time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f140a23a-0de3-4ae6-a1de-79d472ea4055.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the solution of the Schr&#246;dinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130791"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\ce6372de-5fcc-43e0-a5d3-038cc55361c8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for the state vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\6bcd4d40-062c-41b9-9fa8-0d3272921a4c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the initial condition (6) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130792"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\ccb41076-16e5-4802-a2db-d515b0ca298f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the density matrix of system is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130793"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\029feaac-7ff8-4636-8770-e2a408504436.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\86aa54d1-20f3-4d7c-a47c-24b044fb146a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\67bca72d-b1d6-43c2-80f0-f70b328d429b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are given by</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\7e820974-7586-48f3-8d8b-635f5f69ed89.png" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130794"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\506d6c79-5de1-4d1b-ba70-c45612088e46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f5a06a0f-f666-4465-a50f-d985c8d0aa5f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\33c5d94b-8c38-4bf1-aff7-e4f732308fdf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\692e90f9-b10d-48ac-b345-a3328d185165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Rabi frequency which depends on the detuning parameter and nonlinear medium parameter.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Atomic Inversion</title><p>We mainly devote the present section to considering the atomic inversion, from which the phenomenon of collapses and revivals can be observed. However, we shall first introduce some expressions for the probability amplitude. The expressions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\9c45702f-b10e-4b1a-9787-58d3bda83f4e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\d767e478-4c40-4d5c-8676-d62894555400.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represent the probabilities that at time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b08bfc57-70ad-4ea8-b1f1-893f3db87587.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the field has <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\cfc1b205-b7a6-4f62-b253-c9a139b2d053.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> photons present and the atom is in level <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\13d13c0f-c4e1-4ce0-a333-86aa0b6c30b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1881d1fa-e8b0-4676-beb8-3376b8a0427a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively. The probability <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b75a04ab-d4c0-4d80-9549-0232dea8378b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that there is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\93f3a279-7cdd-4f7a-b603-aad0ab2a7b87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> photons in the field at time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3f818caa-051d-43cc-8dee-adc5b91433d6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is therefore obtained by taking the trace over the atomic states, i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130795"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\bc58ad71-ae0d-419e-9061-8ef3209794fe.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1aa8e2b5-90a0-4da7-a2e1-d786b39df479.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the probability that there are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\79b2639e-c479-41ed-9763-f0370400b378.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> photons present the field at time<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3a016c2a-050b-4459-9efd-c4d141f277ac.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is given for a NCS for the field by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130796"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\992cf3bd-f7dd-40d5-a619-bbec4649ee15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Another important quantity one may consider is the atomic inversion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f155d08a-e00d-4c4f-a5e0-237bb2d67ca4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is related to the probability amplitudes <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\7a7b8ade-b364-462c-af4d-5664acf9fb5c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\ebeefb87-6a0e-4911-81c5-b1674f11b9bb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the expression</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130797"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\3387e620-5ffd-4d2e-ac19-8274bc17b8dd.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus from Equation (13) and after some rearrangements, we can obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130798"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\d2a9981b-10e8-4cab-b169-7b49f8082096.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Entropy Squeezing</title><p>In this paper, we use the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (HUR) to study the squeezing information entropy. It has been pointed out that the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (HUR) cannot give sufficient information on the atomic squeezing in some cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref13">13</xref>] . For instance, for a two-level atom, characterized by Pauli operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\8dcbd2cd-68ba-4395-add8-3b97467e8f5e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\319a4750-922d-4edd-a3a4-60a859f7c19b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\00d07198-2946-41d8-8a33-6af86d7d8473.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the uncertainty relation is given by</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\d57bae97-e79a-4e23-acbf-9855d0fb0493.png" /></p><p>where the Pauli operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f72b5a54-6b5f-4001-a89e-fb7779fb6eb7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\fe3deb7d-5f4e-4d36-979d-006da5084760.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\fb86ae49-da32-4dc1-b730-baa1384877c7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, satisfying the commutation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\0436fbbd-b2ca-4dfc-a3f3-85509dc256a2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\7f216e86-1641-4207-bb44-9e11f1e77f70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In this way, the fluctuation in the component <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\abb2b9ad-6f35-4457-945a-7f6d7b3417af.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the atomic dipole is said to be squeezed if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\e7ea6b40-cbf2-48e3-9fed-0d2f4b7e694c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130799"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\49466559-c71a-4ca8-b3ac-c6e1223bf42d.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>An optimal entropic uncertainty relation for sets of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\22f9876a-625b-4b70-a30d-ae73e347bf20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> complementary observables with non-degenerate eigenvalues in an even N-dimensional Hilbert space has been recently investigated using quantum entropy theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref5">5</xref>] . It takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130800"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\a5fd47b2-3444-4675-95ee-0b1d95b54ae6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b9ffa6df-1bac-4a3c-960a-50cb236f1ebc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents the information entropy of the variable<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\258a278c-70b4-4df4-a944-c5005e35e320.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The aim of this paper is to use entropy uncertainty relation EUR (16) as a general criterion for the squeezing in terms of information entropy for a two-level atom in the Jaynes-Cumming model with one-photon process in a non-linear Kerr medium.</p><p>The probability distribution for N possible outcomes of measurements for an arbitrary quantum state of an operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\05bb0e4d-34bb-4303-b397-8e85bb525382.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\af3d38e0-eae8-45d2-94a9-c1fe64d443e3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\47fd3e8e-50f9-4b6f-825b-8fca3e3094d5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an eigenvector of the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\9e93b753-4686-4dda-bc93-9d95bb339cf4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b321b1f6-02ba-472e-bea1-9c98b92ef62b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The corresponding Shannon information entropies are then defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130801"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\02703282-55a9-40b2-a5d4-567d4769594b.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To obtain the Shannon information entropies of the atomic operators<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f20a5f98-d866-478e-b6ef-349e89271bdc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\12e4086b-2125-42f3-92f2-06dfb9fbe908.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\7d31c2b3-a16c-49f8-b343-df91e21dfd90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for a two-level atom, with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\49816cfb-5f77-4b43-a9ba-f87c70cbc840.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one can use the reduced atomic density operator<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\29b1c39a-ccaf-4518-aa7e-357aaa476bcf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, thus we have the following expression,</p><p><img src="htmlimages\7-1300093x\7005d005-17b2-4cf1-843c-c2b5692bf1bd.png" /></p><p>so that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130802"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\2fefb240-c16c-4a2b-8ff9-087239a6a9a0.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130803"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\978699d0-7099-47e4-8012-38e5b956046b.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130804"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\ed2bcc1b-a758-426e-936c-0b1b9abc289a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3064c5ad-8e6c-4311-be32-450ae28b5920.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\5ee12a4a-d3b5-4645-a7c3-04a845176835.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130805"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\b9d36fcc-10fb-493d-aabd-e112bc630b59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130806"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\04423bf7-9f03-48ab-9863-6015a1224126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130807"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\55b8d91f-79fc-4aa5-96d2-a62dc7e55b43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130808"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\a3b8c400-760f-4964-aea1-03e0936ae599.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130809"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\76ae03e7-ca24-4a6c-afaa-5feb79f00d37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130810"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\7b186f86-a8e6-43ed-ba76-42152ccd3e4e.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130811"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\d5047de1-b723-4b16-8ba2-98057a8a5edf.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the uncertainty relation of the entropy can be used as a general criterion for the squeezing of an atom, therefore for a two-level atom. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\0345c4d6-becf-4e6a-ad6a-a2c21653b005.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\76f58e3b-c6ee-45a3-8cfa-020b1e281fd1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the Shannon information entropies of the operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\cae845bc-580f-4dba-8cd5-81a7ca0e4bbc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> will satisfy the inequality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130812"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\f79dc872-28b3-43dd-a714-b100ef4a6508.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In other words, if we define <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\df89ecf5-2ce6-456a-a0fb-81415fbbfe1a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we can write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130813"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\6f5cd68f-cf23-47f1-8d6a-de8425bc1129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is evident that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\4a2f6ff8-3fb5-4883-bf6a-5018e68a2da6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to the atom being in a pure state and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\8fe832bb-8ba8-4d11-bb8d-5560153ccd56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to the atom being in a mixed state. The EUR (16) shows the impossibility of simultaneously having complete information about the observables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\2be44294-2d1e-4dc1-b8b6-b383a30bf76d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\45537ce0-05d3-4ba9-b14e-1444107b2962.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\e77b7112-b609-4468-9e4f-c127cc412672.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\6d25b1af-cbd3-4b4d-852d-84571e2be46b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively measure the uncertainties of the polarization components <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\dfd54586-e9ff-4ce2-bbbd-b8b6af7fd8cd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\89d3ee84-36f3-44e6-8083-02c387326fd9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Now, we define the squeezing of the atom using EUR (16), named squeezing entropy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref5">5</xref>] . The fluctuation of the component <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b0ae16a7-8db9-448c-b346-8c762186a8ea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the atom dipole are said to be “squeezed in entropy” if the information entropy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\486f6302-56e8-4893-8162-358abc893e39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1579202d-b59a-48ca-861b-c4e8da8cbdca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130814"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\609b6748-e96d-4009-9aed-22de509b72d5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>n what follows we shall consider the effect of detuning parameter and the nonlinear Kerr like medium on the dynamical behavior of the squeezing entropy of the system under consideration.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Numerical Computation</title><p>On the basis of the analytical solution presented in the previous section, we shall study numerically the dependence of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b142cbe1-ddbd-4ff9-b5af-e39837af4a84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> entropy squeezing and the atomic inversion<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3f277b66-dac1-407d-ad3a-9c37baeb6cbd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, for various parameters of the one photon model. We recall that time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\812102e6-4e7a-46a4-b10e-17103a213b8c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been scaled; one unit of time is given by the inverse of the coupling constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\9fe15600-cba8-4990-a202-2ef37c99a052.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In all our plots we take <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\462577b1-2cc1-4dd9-bb2b-75db562265da.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to represent the Lamb-Dicke parameter and the parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\e9175e6a-246f-4c88-b935-956f4c6ced19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For the case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\11962fa5-498d-486e-8950-be01953ec4c2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), we investigate the influence of the mean photon number on the entropy squeezing</p><p>factor<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\6cb90fc2-22e7-4c35-8d4e-063099526047.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and population inversion<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\c6d9227d-52f5-4ab0-852f-42bf1cca86ba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We notice that no squeezing occurs on the atomic variable <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\fb275ed9-fafd-4344-841e-bf4af2d76a54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the parameter increased (see Figures 1(a)-(c)).</p><p>But Figures 1(d)-(f), present that with increasing the parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\4a8fc8af-c2ba-4559-b46c-dcc4dc188e40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the entropy squeezing on the atomic variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\42df05c2-23e6-4f6c-8e3a-a172c1b475b8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is increased. Also the quantum revival is increased but the collapse phenomenon is decreased as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3749cd05-cc9e-4d91-adf6-a6a905e2db37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increase (see Figures 1(g)-(i)). These results agree with the case of coherent field but the difference between the coherent state and the nonlinear coherent state appear on the collapse and revival phenomena. For fixed values of the detuning <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\ff3ef38a-98cc-4d44-8b0b-6c9aa05afa64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the detuning parameter and the case of absence the nonlinear medium parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\80b3347c-4b18-40ac-8e5d-30d6ba71efd2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the entropy squeezing factor <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\efbf25e0-5141-4032-82ad-b4350e5924f4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\ed852f51-f985-483a-8c2e-afd90fd86d35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are plotted as a function of the scaled time<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\3aeade7d-7248-46a7-9850-04b5459ec73f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>where we set three different values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\491ff141-9792-4647-b113-5fe925303687.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b54f68a9-14b7-4a36-b880-224c4fd966cb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We noticed no entropy squeezing on the atomic variable <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\2f90c393-616e-4755-9d0c-f9ee8b6c33e4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the detuning parameter increases; see Figures 2(a), (c). Although there is great entropy squeezing on when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\41f9e4ce-e16f-42dd-9d18-c4f99ae0ca63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d) and no squeezing on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\4e010589-ae84-45f3-8957-f4219a53d21b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b2ee278a-e2d8-42fb-8c84-39f261914af1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> see Figures 2(c) and (f).</p><p>This is because <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\7a62aeb1-0437-4bc6-86ae-3d41d2138ff0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43872-formula130815"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\7-1300093x\5dca739d-8798-44f4-833c-b1322b234750.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\2c6ec3db-f7e2-4f3a-9b19-d92c34838d13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Also one can see as the detuning parameter increased the period of evolution increased. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> explains the effect of the detuning parameter when the atom is initially in the superposition state of the upper and lower atomic states and all the other parameters are the same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. It is observed that the situation is completely different between the excited and superposition states (see Figures 2 and 3) First we see that when the detuning increases, the entropy squeezing on the atomic variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\123b3be7-e508-481c-90ea-ee8326d6eb70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases.</p><p>Also there is a great entropy squeezing on the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\a31ff74b-cfa2-42a5-9c68-258fd22e1f7c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>In order to see how the entropy squeezing influenced by the nonlinear medium parameter, we set two different values of the Kerr-medium parameter. Figures 4(a), (d) and (g) show the absence of the nonlinear parameter but</p><p>the other figures show the influence of the nonlinear parameter. It is remarkable that the nonlinear parameter leads to the following effects, no entropy squeezing occurs on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\e330a3b0-e426-4a1b-b631-3146aaf3f9a2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\ce65a657-7a11-4b9e-a08f-baa25e77e1fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> but there is entropy squeezing on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\042a95cc-0378-4238-8495-0d7aea08542e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\e90a8a67-0eec-414c-9a19-cde6bff5c70a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> there is an optimal entropy squeezing on both the atomic variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\025c52d6-a620-41ab-aa97-de7f01c59cb5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\d9fda3ef-ecdd-4f09-9123-2548d41d79ea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> For large values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\653fbb85-bc39-42c9-af52-d19871f090bd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\27c1d8cf-42db-402c-a79e-fea5a954d8e4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> one can see there are more and more optimal entropy squeezing on both of the atomic variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\d23f8457-95a8-46a2-968b-6b13fe81c06a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\161cb659-c348-42fc-9bdf-8471c91f1207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Also the entropy squeezing factors <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\e1cf5dd3-5b3c-4964-b565-e4f180429ae4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f9b43fbe-d720-44ec-9051-861a4386e42a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are periodic functions, which have a period <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b030babf-5744-4a52-9883-c85fae3e3c2d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\18f69328-6903-440b-a783-fee69e503d54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively (see Figures 4(c) and (f)).</p><p>In order to explain the difference between the sources of the radiation fields of the coherent state and the nonlinear coherent state, we must set different values of the Lamb-Diche parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\5424c056-0c40-4c6c-845c-1bb31b9df016.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\1f62fe8e-5093-4c46-98d6-aef6e0dea5cb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the field is initially in the coherent state, but when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b472c7e8-cf1e-4b05-823f-9f093b29c11c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the field is initially in the nonlinear coherent state. Figures 5(a), (d) and (g) show the entropy squeezing in the case of coherent state, which has been examined in many papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43872-ref7">7</xref>] . But Figures 5(b), (e) and (h) show the difference between the coherent and new nonlinear coherent states, where we set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\68e2b168-f716-4f57-b86e-80f5672d23f0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> while we set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\c7ccac0a-ad1f-4286-b93e-c9e37c838335.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Figures 5(d), (f) and (i). One can see there is strong entropy squeezing on the atomic variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\f5b4ed1b-ac64-4db6-a234-a49c9ac24e62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and there is an entropy squeezing and the period of collapse also increases.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>We have treated the entropy squeezing of a two-level atom when the field is initially prepared in the NCS. New results can be explored as follows.</p><p>1) When the field is initially in an NCS, then rich features of the entropy squeezing can be observed, then the entropy squeezing is a good measurement of the information concerning the case of trapped ion.</p><p>2) There is a great difference between the influence of the nonlinearity function f(n), which is used in the de-</p><p>scription of the motion of a trapped ion through Lamb-Dicke parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\873cdf2a-7f20-4e9e-8e48-5e12fc48c1dc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and Kerr medium nonlinearity through parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\7-1300093x\b87288d1-1f5a-4838-835b-12a25408a57b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The first decreases the entropy squeezing but the second increases entropy squeezing.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.43872-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shannon</surname><given-names> C.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1948</year>)<article-title>A Mathematical Theory of Communication</article-title><source> Bell System Technical Journal</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 379</fpage>-<lpage>423</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obada, A.-S.F. and Abdel-Aty, M. (2000) Influence of the Stark Shift and Kerr-Like Medium on the Evolution of Field Entropy and Entanglement in Two-Photon Processes. Acta Physica Polonica, B31, 589.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steane, A. (1998) Quantum Computing. Reports on Progress in Physics, 61, 117-173.http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roy, B. and Roy, P. (2000) New Nonlinear Coherent States and Some of Their Nonclassical Properties.arXiv: quant-ph/0002043.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fang, M.F., Zhou, P. and Swain, S. (2000) Entropy Squeezing for a Two-Level Atom. Journal of Modern Optics, 47, 1043-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500340008233404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdel-Aty, M., Abdel-Khalek, S. and Obada, A.-S.F. (2001) Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, 12, 2015-2022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>El-Shahat</surname><given-names> T.M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Abdel-Khalek</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Abdel-Aty</surname><given-names> M. and Obada</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A.-S.F. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>Chaos Solitons and Fractals Aspects on Entropy Squeezing of a Two-Level Atom in a Squeezed Vacuum</article-title><source> Journal of Modern Optics</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 289</fpage>-<lpage>298</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuzmich, A., Molmer, K. and Polzik, E.S. (1997) Spin Squeezing in an Ensemble of Atoms Illuminated with Squeezed Light. Physical Review Letters, 79, 4782-4785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4782</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saito, H. and Ueda, M. (1999) Squeezed Few-Photon States of the Field Generated from Squeezed Atoms. Physical Review A, 59, 3959-3974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3959</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hirschman</surname><given-names> L.L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1957</year>)<article-title>A Note on Entropy</article-title><source> Journal of Mathematical Physics</source><volume> 79</volume>,<fpage> 152</fpage>-<lpage>156</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-shahat, T.M., Abdel-Khalek, S., Abdel-Aty, M. and Obada, A.-S.F. (2003) Aspects on Entropy Squeezing of a Two-Level Atom in a Squeezed Vacuum. Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, 18, 289-298.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00652-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obada, A.-S.F., Abdel-Khalek, S., Ahmed, M.M.A. and Abo-Kahla, D.A.M. (2009) The Master Equation for a Two-Level Atom in a Laser Field with Squeezing-Like Terms. Optics Communications, 282, 914-921.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2008.10.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kares, K. (1983) States, Effects ond Operations. Springer, Berlin.El-Shahat, T.M., Abdel-Khalek, S. and Obada, A.-S.F. (2005) Entropy Squeezing of a Driven Two-Level Atom in a Cavity with Injected Squeezed Vacuum. Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, 26, 1293-1307.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.03.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43872-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matos Filho, R.L. and Vogel, W. (1996) Nonlinear Coherent States. Physical Review A, 54, 4560-4563.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.4560</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>