<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Medical Imaging</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2788</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmi.2014.41002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMI-43540</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Registration of Two Dental Panoramic Radiographs
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>oichi</surname><given-names>Ogawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jyunpei</surname><given-names>Yamamoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Masatoshi</surname><given-names>Yanase</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akitoshi</surname><given-names>Katsumata</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>2Department of Oral Radiology, Asahi University School of Dentistry, Gifu, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ogawa@hosei.ac.jp(OO)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>03</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In dental panoramic images
  ,
   the information on physical changes of alveolar bone or jaw bone is very important to diagnose several diseases. To detect such change, it is useful to compare two panoramic x-ray images acquired at different times. These two images are usually acquired with different conditions in terms of the positioning of the dental arch, and thus these images can be impaired from some geometrical changes related to the scale of the panoramic images and deformation of the teeth and jaw bones. As a result of this, it is very hard to make an accurate registration. To cope with this issue
  ,
   we developed a dedicated image registration method to match these two images by a newly introduced non-rigid transformation method and registration method using the cross-correlation of localized regions. We evaluated our proposed method with several sets of two images acquired with different geometrical conditions. The material evaluated in this study was a skull phantom. The results of these experiments showed the validity and intrinsic ability of our proposed method in clinical examinations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dental Panoramic Radiography; Registration; Quantitative Analysis; Temporal Image Processing</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recently, periodontitis has been studied also as related to cardiac diseases and diabetes mellitus. Thus the treatment of periodontitis is very important in the prophylaxis of several diseases. In the diagnosis of periodontitis, dental panoramic apparatus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref1">1</xref>] with a tomosynthesis method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref3">3</xref>] is used gradually, because the tomosynthesis method can focus on a specified imaging layer in the dental arch and semi-quantitative analysis of the imaged layer is expected to be realized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref5">5</xref>] . This panoramic imaging apparatus would be useful, if we could detect the temporal changes around a tooth in the progression of periodontitis. In the dental diagnosis, the difference between an image photographed several weeks or months earlier and that photographed now yields important information about disease progression. Commonly, if we want to detect some changes between two radiographic images, we make a registration of these two images, and subtract one image from the other one. This is a simple approach that can be applied to most cases in digital subtraction angiography, because the photographic geometries of these images are almost the same between these two images. However, in the case of dental panoramic imaging, the deformation of images is markedly affected by the geometrical conditions between the patient’s head and imaging devices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref1">1</xref>] . The reasons for the deformation are as follows: 1) a small tilting and/or rotation of the patient’s head makes a large deformation on panoramic images due to the relatively small distance between the x-ray tube and dental arch, and 2) the rotational speed of the detector and x-ray tube along with the movement of the rotational center makes a deformation of panoramic images in the horizontal axis. As a result, the registration of two images is very hard to accomplish. However, if we can succeed in this task, it can be expected to yield useful information for the dental diagnosis and treatment in terms of progression and prognosis.</p><p>For the registration methods in dental radiology, a review paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref6">6</xref>] described several transformations to yield an accurate registration. In these approaches on the registration of dental images, a few isolated teeth are targeted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref7">7</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref12">12</xref>] , while there are very few papers that focused on panoramic images [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43540-ref13">13</xref>] . In the case of panoramic images, we also have to take care of the properties of a panoramic apparatus, such as the rotation speed of the detector and x-ray tube, and the geometrical positioning of the dental arch. So a dedicated algorithm is required for making an accurate registration of two temporal images acquired at different times. The purpose of this study is to develop an accurate registration method of two dental panoramic images acquired at different times and with a different geometry. In the proposed method, we normalized the two images using a non-rigid transformation, and conducted an accurate registration with a cross-correlation method using sub-images. Our method is very simple but reasonably effective without requiring annoying manipulations. This paper described the details of our proposed method and the validity of our proposed method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Proposed Method</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Global Registration</title><p>To match two original images (image-A and image-B) acquired at different times, we first select five anchor points along the teeth row on a dental panoramic image (Figures 1 and 2). Because the shape of a teeth row on two images may differ considerably, e.g. in some cases, a patient loses a tooth, and so we manually select these five anchor points. Let us denote selected five points <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\d4b19464-f2fd-4f84-b4e6-4cf354a20af6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. In addition, we selected two additional points to improve the accuracy of image registration: P<sub>5</sub>(x<sub>5</sub>, y<sub>5</sub>) and P<sub>6</sub>(x<sub>6</sub>, y<sub>6</sub>). These two points are located at near the root of the mandibular second molars. Then a curve is made by interpolating these five points (P<sub>0</sub> ~ P<sub>4</sub>) with a Lagrange polynomial for two images (image-A and image-B). The Lagrange polynomial is denoted as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54381"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\3936366c-d350-4cbd-8715-66667de895b2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And pixel values on this curve through P<sub>0</sub>(x<sub>0</sub>, y<sub>0</sub>) to P<sub>4</sub>(x<sub>4</sub>, y<sub>4</sub>) are mapped on to the straight line through <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\3b5c0b65-c7e9-4072-8c89-7bdf480fb6fa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\69472ebd-2015-409c-8406-0ef978609429.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on a transformed image (image-A'). Then, pixel values perpendicular to the curve are mapped on to the pixel position perpendicular to the straight line (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\ec40b4e6-58a8-4a55-a430-600743ea3756.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\10653adf-0373-472c-8152-3dedaa1db086.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) on the transformed image-A' using a bilinear interpolation between the neighboring pixels. In the last step, we adjust the processed area (region consisting of the ends of the straight line (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\6b5840aa-2ec8-414b-ba64-1ad9754a1b92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\e73e3153-9091-4ccc-82e2-44d23abd36a6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and these two additional points (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\41c78c15-9c8d-471a-9aff-71c5a34e0325.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\ada9e75b-9e61-493d-8d2e-509a64891f9b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>)) so as to form a rectangular shape (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\6cb20c02-7090-4867-81ea-cb75e8dff8a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\6d914067-9803-488e-bd51-be6d21eee16f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\a3458eab-2a65-419f-bfab-72933d65a76b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\596accfe-d31b-42d4-8b68-5adafba6872f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) by relocating the pixel value horizontally. The same process is also done on image-B'.</p><p>Then, the length of any two points <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\63859ab8-c3a1-44b3-b0ed-71308024d818.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in image-B' is scaled so as to match the length of the two corresponding points P'<sub>i</sub>P'<sub>i+1</sub> in image-A'. In this scaling, we calculate the scaling ratio of each segmented line <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\66f99ab4-87b7-4475-bdb8-f27a7fc433a4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\7d034639-dc61-420a-8b48-2cf68178cdaf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The scaling ratios at five points are also interpolated with the Lagrange polynomial as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. And pixel positions in image-B' are scaled using a ratio of the corresponding position in the Lagrange interpolated curve. The pixel values in image-B' are interpolated using this ratio and re-mapped on to image-B'.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Local Registration</title><p>To make an accurate registration between the images (image-A' and image-B'), we divide image-A' into small rectangular regions. The size of a region (N &#215; M) is 100 &#215; 110 pixels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). This size of the region corresponds to a size of a tooth. And we calculate the cross-correlation R between a sub-image in image-A' and sub-image in image-B' selected at an arbitrary position with the same size as that in image-A' (denoted as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\9b000b50-d651-4ade-8696-ddcb30d6de99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\31933dfb-3de9-4a0b-96f6-d7a2a74b9291.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54382"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\492eef4a-d2e9-4827-8b57-53f653e8381c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54383"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\d98d124e-2a45-43ed-bbdc-4178925e350c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54384"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\e1d7b968-d1f0-40a3-90cd-8d62c3c3fece.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By selecting the position of a sub-image in image-B' where R assumes the largest value, we can roughly match two sub-images. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) shows image-B' and the locations of the corresponding sub-images in image-A' denoted by rectangular regions. After finding the matched position (the center position of the sub-image),</p><p> The intensity of the image means the integral of -(attenuation coefficient of x-rays) &#215; (path length in an object); thus D(i, j) means the total amount of changes in x-ray attenuation coefficients, because if the registration is perfectly accomplished, the path-length of x-rays should be the same in both images (image-A' and image-B'). The details are shown in the Appendix. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c) shows an example of D(i, j) between two panoramic images shown in this example. In the original image, there was a thin copper plate at the right upper jaw in image-B. So a shadow appeared in this place.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimantal Setting</title><p>To confirm the validity of our registration method, we acquired several panoramic images with different geome-</p><p> In this experiment we used a human skull phantom (Kyotokagaku, Kyoto, Japan) shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a), and photographed it while changing its positioning. The performance of the registration between two images was evaluated with four ROIs set on a resultant image. First we acquired an image at the normal position (image-A) and then the second image (image-B) at a slightly different position in terms of the rotation of the head or tilting of the face. As for the rotation of the head, we rotated the head by 2 or 4 degrees in a left direction, and for the tilting angle we tilted the face 2 or 4 degrees from the initial position of image-A.</p><p>To evaluate the accuracy of measurement in terms of the linear attenuation coefficient of a material, we placed a thin aluminum plate with a thickness of 1 ~ 5 mm inside the upper front teeth as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b). And we changed the thickness of the aluminum plate and measured the density of the resultant image. In this measurement, we removed the phantom each time from the table on which the phantom had been placed. And we conducted the image registration mentioned above. To calculate the pixel value, we set a region of interest (ROI) with a size of 60 &#215; 60 pixels in the position of the aluminum plates.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the results of the experiments in terms of the head rotation. Image-A was an image photographed at the initial position and three images (image-B) were photographed at the second time. The three images were acquired without any rotation of the head and with a rotation of 2 or 4 degrees. The difference images are shown in this figure. We set four ROIs (shown in dotted rectangles) in the resultant image and calculated the mean squared error (MSE) and standard deviation (SD). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the results of the experiments in terms of the face tilting. Image-A was the same as that used in the previous experiment. And three images (image-B) were photographed at the second time. The three images were acquired without any tilting of the face and with an upward tilting of 2 or 4 degrees. The difference images are shown in this figure. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the shadow of the aluminum plates and the position of the ROI for quantitative analysis. The lower graph shows the relationship between the averaged intensity in the difference image and the thickness of the aluminum plate. In this graph, we added a theoretical curve.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The image registration of dental panoramic images is very important in the diagnosis of dental diseases, and this technique is also applicable to postmortem investigations. However, the registration of two images is very difficult in usual cases compared to the digital subtraction angiography commonly used in clinical practice, because the shapes of the photographed teeth and jaw bones significantly differ from each other. This is mainly caused by the geometrical photographic conditions in the process of data acquisition. The distance between the targeted regions such as teeth/jaw bones and the x-ray tube is short, and so a small difference in the positioning of a patient’s head makes a large deformation in a panoramic x-ray image. And so a dedicated approach is required for</p><p>the registration of panoramic x-ray images. Our proposed method consisted of two steps: one is a global registration and the other is local registration. In the process of the former, we used a manual operation to identify the targeted area. The number of teeth may change sometimes, if the interval between the two panoramic x-ray im-</p><p>ages is long, and so a full automatic selection of a targeted area may introduce a large registration error. However, the interactive operation in our method requires only the decision of seven positions around the upper or lower teeth, and so this operation is not burdensome to the dentist. In the selection of five anchor points along a teeth row, we need not worry about the accuracy of positioning between two acquisitions, because the curve of a teeth row is used for forming the targeted area approximately, and an accurate registration process is performed in the local registration. To make a well smoothed curve, we used the Lagrange polynomial. In our method, we pay attention to the length of a segmented curve such as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\8ff8dbfe-eb0c-4d95-af00-4369359585ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This length may change if the center of the head shifts slightly from the desired position for panoramic imaging. In addition, if the rotation speed of the x-ray tube and detector changes slightly, the length changes. However, the length changes gradually and it depends on the angular position, and so we used the Lagrange polynomial to calculate the position depending on the scaling ratio determined at each angular position. The above transformation improves the accuracy of the registration as a preprocessing step of panoramic x-ray images. In the local registration, we calculated the cross-correlation of sub-images. To increase the registration accuracy, we conducted this processing in three steps with sub-images with different sizes. The results of the experiments showed that if the two images were acquired under ideal conditions, the registration accuracy would be very high as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. If the head rotated slightly, there were very small differences over all teeth. And the error increased when the rotation angle increased. In this experiment, we evaluated the rotation of the head by 4 degrees, which is an acceptable mis-positioning in a clinical study. For the tilting of the face, our proposed method yielded good results in registration between two images. In this experiment, we evaluated the tilting of the face by 4 degrees. The registration process was successful in this case, although a shadow of the cervical vertebrae appeared in the center of the processed image (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). We surmised that the path of the x-rays was more sensitive to the cervical vertebrae as compared to the case of rotation of the head. The experiment to quantify the change in different images showed that there was linearity between the intensity change and the thickness of the aluminum plate. However, the error between the measured value and the theoretical one increased as the thickness increased. This is caused by the beam hardening effect of x-rays.</p><p>In conclusion, we developed a new method to detect differences between two dental panoramic images acquired at different times. The method consisted of a non-rigid transformation of panoramic images and registration of transformed images in a hierarchical structure. The validity of our method was clarified with the results of experiments using a skull phantom. The results of registration showed that small changes can be detected with the help of difference image.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Appendix</title><p>Let us assume the lengths of a bone and tooth to be l<sub>b</sub> and l<sub>t</sub>, and the linear attenuation coefficients of these materials m<sub>b</sub> and m<sub>t</sub>, respectively. The intensity of x-rays emitted as I<sub>0</sub> changes after passing through these materials is denoted as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54385"><label>(A-1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\e2806390-b3a7-4b2b-89d7-d4f1e8cb9391.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If there was some change in density of the alveolar bone or jaw bone due to periodontitis, the product of m<sub>b</sub> and l<sub>b</sub> would change as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\99644b83-e1f5-4d08-845f-ef61bcb3fb6e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\2-2060085x\3be0a18e-716a-4100-9d72-7186b2b7c679.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The measured intensity in the panoramic x-ray image at the different time can be denoted as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54386"><label>(A-2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\4ae1ca06-efe2-40cf-9bfe-5f15975e1035.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we divide these two equations and take a logarithm, the result becomes as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43540-formula54387"><label>(A-2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\2-2060085x\4ca40859-ba82-480b-8e63-f5d3c20bc39c.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This value corresponds to D(i, j) in Equation (5). If the intensity of x-rays changes between two images, this component remains as a bias component in the resultant image. So we can remove this component by subtracting the average value of image D(i, j), and we can detect the difference of two images with this image. The difference image may be expected to be useful as an index in diagnosing periodontitis or osteoporosis.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.43540-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Langland, O.E., Langlais, R.P., McDavid, M.D. and DelBalso, A.M. (1989) Panoramic Radiology. 2nd Edition, Lea &amp; Febiger, Philadelphia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grant, D.G. (1972) Tomosynthesis: A Three-Dimensional Radiographic Imaging Technique. IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, 19, 20-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1972.324154</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogawa, K., Langlais, R.P., McDavid, M.D., Noujeim, M., Seki, K., Okano, T., et al. (2010) Development of a New Dental Panoramic Radiographic System Based on a Tomosynthesis Method. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 39, 47-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/12999660</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noujeim, M., Prihoda, T., McDavid, W.D., Ogawa, K., Seki, K., Okano, T., et al. (2011) Pre-Clinical Evaluation of a New Dental Panoramic Radiographic System Based on Tomosynthesis Method. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 40, 42-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/73312141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katsumata, A., Ogawa, K., Inukai, K., Matsuoka, M., Nagano, T., Nagaoka, H., et al. (2011) Initial Evaluation of Linear and Spatially Oriented Planar Images from a New Dental Panoramic System Based on Tomosynthesis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology, 112, 375-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lehmann, T.M., Groendahl, H.-G. and Benn, D.K. (2000) Computer-Based Registration for Digital Subtraction in Dental Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 29, 323-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600558</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoon, D.C. (2000) A New Method for the Automated Alignment of Dental Radiographs for Digital Subtraction Radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 29, 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600487</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holmes, J.P., Gulabivala, K. and van der Stelt, P.F. (2001) Detection of Simulated Internal Tooth Resorption Using Conventional Radiography and Subtraction Imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 30, 249-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600626</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dornier, C., Dorsaz-Brossa, L., Thévenaz, P., Casagni, F., Brochut, P., Mombelli, A. and Vallée, J.P. (2004) Geometric Alignment and Chromatic Calibration of Serial Radiographic Images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 33, 220-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/71716997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zacharaki, E.I., Matsopoulos, G.K., Asvestas, P.A., Nikita, K.S., Groendahl, K. and Groendahl, H.-G. (2004) A Digital Subtraction Radiography Scheme Based on Automatic Multiresolution Registration. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 33, 379-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/21571843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueneri, P., Gogues, S., Tugsel, Z., Ozturk, A., Gungor, C. and Boyacioglu, H. (2006) Clinical Efficacy of a New Software Developed for Dental Digital Subtraction Radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 35, 417-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/21142030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carneiro, L.S., Nunes, C.A., Silva, M.A., Leles, C.R. and Mendonca, E.F. (2009) In Vivo Study of Pixel Grey-Mea-surement in Digital Subtraction Radiography for Monitoring Caries Remineralization. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 38, 73-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/15857365</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43540-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mekky, N.E., Abou-Chadi, F.E.-Z. and Kishk, S. (2011) A New Hybrid Registration Technique for Dental Panoramic X-Ray Images. Proceedings of IEEE Medical Imaging Conference, 140-145.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>