<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2014.52018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-43173</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Characterization and Evaluation of Natural Resources for Land Use Diversification Planning: A Case Study in a Block of Meghalaya Using RS &amp; GIS Technique
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ratibha</surname><given-names>T. Das</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Suchitra Devi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Sudhakar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mammi</surname><given-names>Rently</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>District &amp;amp; Local Research Station &amp;amp; Laboratories, Shillong, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Department of Space, Government of India, Umiam, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>thakuriapratibha@rediffmail.com(RTD)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>02</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>177</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>25,</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Characterization and evaluation of land resources of Mawryngkneng block was carried out using IRS-P6 LISS III and LISS-IV data. Five major physiographic units namely structural hills, denudational hills, plateau and intermontane valley were identified. Visual interpretation of satellite data indicated that 32.2% of the total geographical area (TGA) is under dense forest followed by wastelands (28.8%), open forest (16.1%), cultivated area (13.6%), built up area (8.2%) and water body (0.9%). Ten soil series were tentatively identified and the soils belonged to 2 orders (Ultisols and Alfisols), 3 sub orders (Udult, Udalf and Humult), 6 great groups, 8 sub groups. The soils are moderately acidic, deep to very deep and texture varies from sandy clay loam to clay. The soils are very rich in organic carbon. The availability of nitrogen is medium to high and phosphorus availability is low to medium whereas potassium availability is low in the entire study area. The soils were grouped into land capability class II &amp; III and the soils were moderately to marginally suitable for orange and marginally suitable for pine apple. An action plan with suggested land use and interventions has been prepared by using all land resource information generated under the study. The action plan includes areas for afforestation, intensive cultivation in the existing cropped areas with soil conservation measures like mulching, zero tillage etc. and orange and pine apple plantation in open scrub lands which are cultivable wastelands. This might help the farmers and the planner in better management of land resources for sustained productivity. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Land Resources; Land Evaluation; Alternate Land Use; Remote Sensing; GIS</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Throughout human history, increasing population growth and changing dietary patterns have resulted in more and more land moving from forest or grasslands into agricultural lands. Demand for food is increasing as populations grow and gain wealth to purchase more varied and resource-intensive diets. There is increased competition for land, water, energy, and other inputs into food production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref1">1</xref>]. Increase in population, changes in dietary habits associated with increase in income, decline in per capita land area, and decline in per capita availability of renewable fresh water aggravated by excessive withdrawal of ground water are the compelling reasons for intensification of agriculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref2">2</xref>]. Intensive agriculture is the cultivation of land where there are very high inputs of labour, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides to obtain the maximum output. This involves the use of mechanical ploughing, chemical fertilizers, plant growth regulators and/or pesticides. It is associated with the increasing use of agricultural mechanization, which has enabled a substantial increase in production. But it also dramatically increases deforestation and conversion of grassland to agriculture, soil degradation by increasing soil erosion, compaction, crusting and water logging, salinisation, alkalisation, acidification, soil pollution and nutrient depletion, reduction of organic matter content in the soil and poisoning water with agricultural chemicals. This leads to low soil productivity and managing such soil is a formidable challenge to ensure productivity, profitability and national food security on sustainable basis. Sustained food security calls for increasing the crop production by maintaining the productivity of existing crop lands, preventing degradation of fertile lands and bringing erstwhile degraded lands under plough. The importance of sustainable utilisation of natural resources has been widely recognized for which information on the nature, extent spatial distribution and temporal behavior of land resources is a pre-requisite. Space borne remote sensing can effectively fulfill this role as it is proven tool for fast and accurate appraisal of natural resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref3">3</xref>]. The information thus generated can be put in a Geographic Information System (GIS) that aids planners in decision-making as well as in scientific management of land resources.</p><p>Soil characterization is basically an inference process based on Jenny’s model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref4">4</xref>]. According to this model climate, parent material, relief or topography, vegetation and time are the soil forming factors that influence on soil characteristics. The climate acting over parent material for pedogenic time on different physiographic unit is the most dominant factor responsible for development of different types of soil to support different vegetation. Vegetation types are also one active factor which greatly influences soil formation by adding organic matter, providing pores for translocation and accumulation of minerals and clay. During soil development many morphological, physical, chemical, biochemical and, macro and microbiological reactions and processes occur simultaneously as also interactively in soils. These reaction and processes that affect the properties of soils and its development are in turn influenced by several natural factors viz., climate, organism, parent material and modified to a great extend by the relief features. The surface configuration is the chief factor in soil development and close relation exists between soils and their morphological setting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref5">5</xref>]. Since the productive potential of the soils is limited by intrinsic characteristics, understanding of the soils as influenced by landscape features is of great significance. The spatial information technologies viz. Remote sensing (RS), Geographic Information System (GIS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) have made it possible to characterize the soil forming factors and infer soil boundaries based on field survey, soil sample analysis image characteristics. The application of satellite remote sensing data products for small and medium scale soil mapping is widely accepted, but they have not been used for large scale soil mapping due to coarse resolution of satellite data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref6">6</xref>]. With advances in terms of spatial, spectral and radiometric resolutions of the sensors, studies have been initiated to characterize soils at large scale through physiography-land use-soil relationship [6- 11].</p><p>The land use planning involves making knowledgeable decisions about land use and the environment. Soil information is a vital component in the planning process, reflecting directly upon land-use suitability. The land evaluation system of FAO (1983) was based on land qualities as related to individual crops that was used to develop the crop requirements based on experiences in tropical areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref12">12</xref>]. This land evaluation system for land use was earlier adopted to derive land suitability map in Seoni district, Madhya Pradesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref13">13</xref>]. Computer program, which includes decision support systems (models) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has contributed to the speed and efficiency of overall planning process. Quick and efficient access to large amount of information was enabled by GIS, exhibiting relationships, patterns, and trends that are useful in combining soil survey information to monitor land use changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref14">14</xref>]. Soil survey database could be used to estimate soil characteristics based on known relationship to other soil physical and chemical properties and also to improve fertilizer recommendations on the basis of soil test values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref15">15</xref>]. Of late, advanced land evaluation techniques have been found useful in addressing soil fertility constraints and management problems in the areas of low productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref16">16</xref>]. In some of such areas that are inhabited by tribal farming communities crop failures were experienced frequently due to traditional agricultural practices. These areas should be given priorities for improved crop planning and agricultural development. The land resources can be better managed through systematic soil characterization and evaluating their potentials and limitations with appropriate interventions. Keeping in view above, an attempt has been made to characterize and evaluate the land resources of Mawryngkneng Community and Rural Development Block of East Khasi hills district of Meghalaya using Resourcesat-I data and GIS.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Mawryngkneng Community and Rural Development Block is one of the oldest block lies in the East Khasi Hills District of Meghalaya between 25˚32'05''N to 25˚38'20''N latitude and 91˚50'00''E to 92˚10'00''E logitude. The total study area is approximately 310.6 sq&#183;km. The area is covered by Survey of India Toposheet 78 O/14 and 83 C/2 on 1:50,000 scale (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The geology of the study area comprises mostly of 1) Shillong Group of rocks-quartzite, phyllite, conglomerate 2) Arehan gneiss complex 3) Granite rocks and tertiary sediments consisting mainly of sandstone, limestone, silts</p><p>stone, shale and pebbles, clays, conglomerates. These sedimentary rocks are in complex form. Physiographically, the area is mostly characterized by Structural Hills, Denudational Hills and Valley associated with nearly level to moderately steeply sloping lands. The study area is sparsely populated with a total population of 50,035. The habitation is restricted mostly to village settlements and very few homesteads. Out of the total household of 8751 families, the male population is 47% and the female account for 52.8%. The manpower resource is derived from the age group of 14 to 50 years of both male and female gender. The average size of the family is 8 out of which 49.66% of the population is literate. Agriculture is the main occupation of the people. The general standard of living of the people is poor to medium. There are several educational institutions within the area from Primary to High School standard. There are several registered growers of potato and retailers of chemical fertilizers. The National Highway 44 runs through a part of the study area, and hence the farmers can easily market their products. 70% of the villages are connected with kutcha motorable roads.</p><p>The study area represents the typical sub-tropical northeastern region. Mild summer and cold winter characterize it. The mean summer temperature is 22˚C and mean winter temperature is 3˚C. The average annual rainfall of the area is 2087 mm with more than 80% occur during the period from April to October and qualify for thermic and udic soil temperature and soil moisture regimes, respectively. The study area entirely covered by natural vegetation comprises Pine (Pinus khasiana) in the higher elevation and tree species such as Schima vallichi, Phyllanthus emblica, etc. are in the lower elevation, scrubs interspersed with grasses and rock out crops. Cultivation is done on the valley fields as well as on the upland. Bun Cultivation is unique system of cultivation followed here where the gentle slope up to 15 percent are used for cultivation of crops like potatoes, cabbage, cauliflower and tomatoes in ridges along the slopes. The cultivation sites on the hill slopes are permanent. In bun cultivation farmers covers the branches of trees and grasses with soil and then burn them inside the ridges made along the slope [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref17">17</xref>]. Farmyard Manure and chemical fertilizers are then added to it. Agriculture is the main source of livelihood of the people in the study area. The main crops grown are Lowland/Wet Paddy, Upland paddy, tomatoes, potatoes (twice in a year) peas, maize, cabbage, cauliflower, carrot, radish, sweet potato, ginger and tea plantations in few pockets are also found. The cropping season of the major crops are as given in  <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Satellite and Ancillary Data</title><p>Digital data of IRS -P6 (Resourcesat-1) LISS III sensor of October, 2011 (Spatial resolution of 23.5 m) and LISS-IV sensor (Spatial resolution of 5.8 m) of February, 2012 was used to prepare physiography, lithology and land use land cover map. Digital Elevation Model generated from Cartosat-I image was used to derive slope information.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Methodology</title><p>The methodology followed for extraction of information from satellite data is essentially of standard visual interpretation based on tone, texture, shape and size [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43173-ref18">18</xref>]. The slope map was derived from Digital Elevation Model generated under SISDIP project for Meghalaya at North</p></sec></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.43173-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Garnett, M. C. Appleby, A. Balmford, I. J. Bateman, T. G. Benton, P. Bloomer, B. Burlingame, M. Dawkins, L. Dolan, D. Fraser, M. Herrero, I. Hoffmann, P. Smith, P. K. Toulmin, C. Thornton, S. J. Vermeulen and H. C. J. Godfray, “Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies,” Science, Vol. 341, No. 6141, 2013, pp. 33-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Lal, “Soils and India’s Food Security,” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, Vol. 56, 2008, pp. 129-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Remote Sensing Agency, “In Manual: Nationwide Mapping of Land Degradation Using Multi-Temporal Satellite Data,” 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Jenny, “Factors of Soil Formation,” McGraw Hill Publisher, New York, 1941.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. L. Wright, “An Evaluation of Soil Variability over Single Bedrock Type in Part of Southeast Spain,” Catena, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1996, pp. 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(96)00004-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Srivastava and R. K. Saxena, “Technique of Large Scale Soil Mapping in Basaltic Terrain Using Satellite Remote Sensing Data,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 25, 2004, pp. 679-688.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kudrat, A. K. Sinha and M. L. Manchandra, “Multilevel Soil Mapping Using IRS IC WiFS, LISS III and Pan Data,” Indian Space Research Organisation, Bangalore. 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. E. Shukla, J. Prasad, M. S. S. Nagaraju, R. Srivastava and D. L. Kauraw, “Use of Remote Sensing in Characterisation and Management of Dhamni Micro-Watershed of Chandrapur District of Maharastra,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Vol. 58, 2009, pp. 64-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. P. Girish, M. S. S. Nagaraju, J. Prasad and R. Srivastava, “Characterization, Evaluation and Mapping of Land Resources in Lendi Watershed, Chandrapur District of Maharastra Using Remote Sensing and GIS,” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Sciences, Vol. 58, 2010, pp. 442-448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Das. Pratibha, “Study of the Soils of Deepor Beel Catchment in Relation to Soil Forming Factors Using Remote Sensing and GIS,” Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2010, pp. 94-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. B. Rashmi, R. Srivastava, M. S. S. Nagaraju and J. Prasad, “Characterization and Evaluation of Land Resources for Watershed Management in Vidabha Region of Maharastra Using RS &amp; GIS,” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2012, pp. 261-268.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Sys, V. Ranst, J. Debaveye and F. Beernaert, “Land Evaluation Part III, Crop Requirements,” Agricultural Publication No. 7, ITC Ghent, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. V. Bobade, B. P. Bhaskar, M. S. Gaikawd, P. Raja, S. S. Gaikwad, S. G. Anantwar, S. V. Patil, S. R. Singh and A. K. Maji, “A GIS Based Land Use Suitability Assessment in Seoni District, Madhya Pradesh, India,” Tropical Ecology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2010, pp. 41-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. M. Stout and B. D. Lee, “Land Use Planning Exercise Using Geographic Information System and Digital Soil Survey,” Journal of Natural Resource Life Science &amp; Education, Vol. 33, 2004, pp. 11-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. S. Seok, S. D. Hong and J. H. Ahn, “Soil Fertility Evaluation by Application of Geographic Information System for Tobacco Fields,” Journal of Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer, Vol. 21, 1999, pp. 36-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. D. Hong and H. T. Park, “Soil Fertility Evaluation with Adoption of Soil Map Data Base for Tobacco Fields,” Journal of Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer, Vol. 32, 1999, pp. 95-108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anon, “In Project Report: Soil Fertility Mapping of Mawryngkneng Community and Rural Development Block,” 2010, pp. 12-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. M. Lillisand and R. W. Keifer, “Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation,” John Wiley, Singapore, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IARI, “Soil Survey Manual,” All India Soil and Land Use Survey, IARI, New Delhi, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO, “FAO Guidelines for Soil Profile Description,” Rome, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SLUSI, “Annual Report,” IARI, New Delhi, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43173-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klingebiel and Montgomery, “Land Capability Classification, USDA Handbook,” US Government Pr. Office, Washington DC, 1966, 21 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>