<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ICA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Intelligent Control and Automation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-0653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ica.2014.51004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ICA-43069</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  H-Infinite Controller Design of Singular Networked Control Systems
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hanzhi</surname><given-names>Qiu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>Shi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Software Technology Institute, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>zhanzhiqiuok@163.com(HQ)</email>;<email>shilei687@126.com(LS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>02</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   This paper investigates the H<sub>∞</sub> controller design method for a class of singular networked control systems (SNCS) based on the singular plant. In view of the network-induced delay less than or equal to a sampling period, finite external disturbance, clock-driven sensors, event-driven controller and actuators as well as impulse behavior and structural instability of singular plants, the H<sub>∞</sub> controller design method of SNCS with state feed- back way and dynamic output feedback way is investigated respectively by means of the linear matrix inequality method. The existence condition of H<sub>∞</sub> control law, the solving approaches of H<sub>∞</sub> controller parameters and disturbance attenuation degree are presented. Finally, a simulation example is given to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the presented method. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Singular Networked Control Systems; &lt;i&gt;H&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;&amp;infin;&lt;/sub&gt;  Controller Design; Network-Induced Delay; Disturbance Attenuation Degree</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Networked control system (NCS) is a distributed realtime feedback control system where the system node situates different geographical position exchange data and control signal with controller via communication network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref1">1</xref>]. Due to limited network bandwidth and restraint of communication mechanism, unexpected phenomenon such as networked-induced delay and data packet loss exist typically in communication channel, which often makes NCS lose invariability, integrality, causality and certainty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref2">2</xref>], therefore, the study of NCS is more complicated and challenging. The traditional control theories and methods built on point-to point direct control system are not suitable for NCS, which makes rapid development on NCS over the past few years. Since the end of last century, the research of NCS experiences the process of from simple to complex, from single to comprehensive and from special to general. A large number of results have been reported, for instance, system complexity analysis [3,4], quantized dynamic output feedback control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref5">5</xref>], observer-based controller design [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref6">6</xref>], state estimation and stabilization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref7">7</xref>], <img src="4-7900310x\4420c380-4d08-4b33-adc7-c52ca210d4d5.jpg" />control method [8,9], faulttolerant control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref10">10</xref>], guaranteed cost control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref11">11</xref>], codesign [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref12">12</xref>], etc.</p><p>It should be pointed out that, most of the results in the existing literature are focused on linear normal system, while the study of singular networked control system (SNCS) based on singular system has not been addressed intensively. Since the dynamics of singular system is quite different from normal linear/nonlinear system, and has many characteristics such as pulse characteristics, no causality, no solution, no uniqueness, structure instability, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref13">13</xref>]. Therefore, the investigation of SNCS is rather interesting. In fact, the research about SNCS is still in the primary stage. The existing results are limited to system modeling, stability analysis and ordinary control method [14-18].</p><p>In this paper, we aim to investigate the stabilization and <img src="4-7900310x\a5be8412-fb0b-4183-a813-fc9ff808e232.jpg" /> controller design method for a class of SNCS subject to the double characteristics of singular systems and NCS. In this work, network-induced delay, limited input disturbance, impulse behaviour are taken into simultaneous consideration. The <img src="4-7900310x\5c03e9d5-e70c-437e-9da0-ec9058f52970.jpg" /> control method of SNCS with state feedback way and dynamic output feedback way is investigated respectively by means of the linear matrix inequality method. The existence condition of <img src="4-7900310x\fb71001f-0c52-4e76-80cf-9a298dd15ebd.jpg" /> control law, the solving approaches of <img src="4-7900310x\7968a164-91b6-4ccc-a017-67e916e5fbc7.jpg" /> controller parameters and disturbance attenuation degree in different feedback way are presented. Finally, a simulation example is given to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Problem Formulation</title><p>The SNCS based on singular plant is shownin <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. where <img src="4-7900310x\14b7b645-bed8-4d83-9fc9-5d0e539e2c75.jpg" /> and <img src="4-7900310x\76d425c4-92c1-47f0-9744-cb48a5b8ec33.jpg" /> are control input, measure state or measure output, external disturbance andexpectation output respectively. The plant is a class of singular plant, and the data packets are transmitted via network. Choice of communication network and determine of feedback control way depend on site state and control goals of plant. The aim are to guarantee systems stable, for external disturbance, expected output of the system is not affected as far as possibleor very small.</p><p>In this paper, it is assumed that sensors are driven by clock, controller and actuators are driven by event, the measuresensorssample the state value or output value of the plant with period<img src="4-7900310x\0ddd29c8-843c-441f-a70e-a13103cfb282.jpg" />, the measured value are transmitted to the remote controller via network after A/D conversion and packaging; controller respond immediately to calculate control law and transmit to actuator node after receiving the information from sensors, and actuator node work immediately to implementadjustment job after receiving the control signal from the controller.</p><p>As the system is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, there are two kinds of problem to consider: the singular characteristics the plant and the network communication characteristics of the control network. For singular plant, its state response contains not only the exponential term similar to normal systems, but also the pulse term and input derivative item, which will make the whole system have pulse behavior. The pulse reduces not only the performance and even leads to unstable system, which is a fatal destructiveness for the system. For network communication,as a result oflimited network bandwidth and restraint of communication mechanism, the network communication obtains uncertainty and complexity. The most prominent problem is network-induced delay. As seen in  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <img src="4-7900310x\117b19d3-d982-4f8d-a276-959e4be8cb45.jpg" />denotes the network-induced delay between sensor node and controller node, and <img src="4-7900310x\ba748bae-f4f1-4a5f-b24d-5a455d1cf967.jpg" /> denotes the network-induced delay between controller node and actuator node, and all of the network-induced delay of closed-loop system<img src="4-7900310x\1a714b4f-3944-4ed4-ae35-1aca9135527d.jpg" />. The delay performance depends on the communication protocol</p><p>employed by the communication network. The delay maybe is constant, random, limited, even Markov chain feature. In order to enhance the system performance, in a general way, we make as far as possible it constant. Furthermore, there exists single packet and multiple packet transmission, data packet loss, network connection interrupt and channel interference etc. All of these problems will make the structure characteristics of closeloop systems change, and influence the stability and control performance of the SNCS.</p><p>In this paper, the considered singular plant is shown in equation (1):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101530"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\fe97039a-a09b-4b64-b2ff-53ad5539f132.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\7c88d97b-2f62-4b15-af89-638f74d327f0.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\aeab71eb-f237-446d-9b59-745e799fa559.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\211d9ec3-867d-469b-8534-ba91dfa2df2f.jpg" />and <img src="4-7900310x\50db0a0a-29e8-4a9f-93f8-01d54e2cb23e.jpg" /></p><p>are state vector, control input vector, output vector and expectation output vector, respectively.<img src="4-7900310x\b041c636-04ba-4379-94df-1ab7da63861d.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\48c99b29-be44-4e34-bc7b-f29c5a4161c5.jpg" />and <img src="4-7900310x\63b9aada-cc9e-4d73-9ef6-c6eeb9235691.jpg" /> are constant matrix, <img src="4-7900310x\c267c2b5-6474-4244-ae4c-aa4f10e5a5b5.jpg" />is singular matrix, i.e.<img src="4-7900310x\9a8bac64-aec2-4cd0-ba37-dced1891204d.jpg" />; <img src="4-7900310x\5675a4d8-0948-4abe-8791-8ef492bac355.jpg" />is finite external disturbance, <img src="4-7900310x\a950f2fb-2eca-4713-a3a0-305109eb0c46.jpg" />are corresponding dimension constant matrix.</p><p>Throughout this paper, the following assumptions are made:</p><p>1) The singular plant is regular and impulse free, which is achieved by adjustingthe part structure and componentconfiguration of plant, such that one of the following holds:</p><p>a) <img src="4-7900310x\77c9b803-566b-4af4-9472-33b51316c9af.jpg" /></p><p>b) <img src="4-7900310x\3df18aa8-5836-4140-81d7-ebc28309b5b1.jpg" /></p><p>2) The network-induced delay of closed-loop system is less than or equal to a sampling period, i.e.<img src="4-7900310x\e4fe3e20-2354-4130-ade0-1afb3abf850d.jpg" />, and the sample period <img src="4-7900310x\b408ba8a-6d74-486e-9516-0beaf605692e.jpg" /> is constant, which is achieved bychoosing suitable communication protocol of control network and designing part device of the system.</p><p>3) The network communication is single packet transmission, and there is no packet loss.</p><p>4) The external input disturbance of the plant is finite energy, i.e. the close-loop transfer function from <img src="4-7900310x\7072e9e0-bfce-49ed-b684-9d1a8df16338.jpg" />to <img src="4-7900310x\f1e0959d-49e3-4547-a2a8-869cb191e9bb.jpg" /> satisfies<img src="4-7900310x\bdd46398-fa19-4b0b-bee7-f6cfa68b9cac.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\84fa3837-6d68-48a3-a83e-0df67d30fa62.jpg" />is a scalar.</p><p>According to condition (1), when the singular plant is regular and impulse free, there are always two nonsingular matrices<img src="4-7900310x\d89af2ec-20c4-48cd-b526-4a7ac73a3267.jpg" />, such that</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\d772b7f9-88d9-44d0-a6dc-dc80513ed27f.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\0ef4b4ed-5a3f-44c4-9443-05eadf653fa6.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\42b72869-502a-41fc-8a05-f8ec66902886.jpg" /></p><p>Let<img src="4-7900310x\47f79d55-d29f-4b34-b25a-292261c0b9ba.jpg" />, equation (1) can be equivalent transformed as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101531"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\dc0ddf56-4e23-4826-b1e2-847c89b03b60.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When the network-induced delay<img src="4-7900310x\cc954c81-b814-468d-9fe1-99f43d249ac9.jpg" />, control input<img src="4-7900310x\6e8ce81c-baf9-4076-b653-b4f77326d3e8.jpg" /> is piecewise continuous in a sampling period, the discrete-time model of equation (2) in a sampling period can be shown as equation (3):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101532"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\5061f865-e885-4890-a1d1-d831b13997c2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\33456df6-5262-43bd-89d5-4eef4532c8c7.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\a758e94a-e38d-436c-b31c-d7cb9faeedd0.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\129e6c4c-7880-4959-bb68-a588a6d19a81.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\e4cfae02-24ef-4474-8b1a-f9170a8d57bb.jpg" />.</p><p>The state feedback controller model is shown in equation (4).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101533"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\fcdb8bf9-2d7b-497b-9299-e06780efabe8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combine equation (3) with equation (4), the following closed-loop system is obtained</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\4cc18b01-fd72-49f3-890f-6ee7cf67739c.jpg" /></p><p>Let augmented state vector<img src="4-7900310x\d846d70a-7a08-44d5-97a2-8b5207829071.jpg" />therefore, the close-loop model of state feedback SNCS is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101534"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\1d876601-5acd-4294-8723-d80f0696999b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When the state variables are not measurable, or partial state is measurable, we will put to use the following dynamic output feedback controller:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101535"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\4522f102-6345-44f4-9eef-8499569222dd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combine equation (3) and equation (6), the following can be obtained:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\d62996e3-7986-4a05-9d17-5d7442314a72.jpg" /></p><p>Let augmented state vector</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\d6b89fc3-309f-4929-b515-4bc0b3a391b3.jpg" />, then, the close-loop model of dynamic output feedback SNCS is shown in equation (7):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101536"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\82c0f8ad-da24-4f93-b439-02fa2dc2233a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Clearly, whether put to use state feedback or output feedback, the close-loop system model of SNCS is a linear normal system depending on time delay<img src="4-7900310x\d70eb6e1-4cfc-4da3-927b-910489a68d70.jpg" />. When <img src="4-7900310x\0e4ab9c0-0a1e-4e57-b031-694690355f56.jpg" /> is constant quantity, the close-loop system model of SNCS is a linear time-invariant system, when <img src="4-7900310x\5da898b9-bbf5-4687-92b7-883c79b12da7.jpg" /> changes with time, the close-loop system model of SNCS is a time-varyingsystem.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. <img src="4-7900310x\242f281e-aa31-41c6-a082-62b70eb47470.jpg" />Controller Design</title><p>Define 1: Given a positive constant<img src="4-7900310x\5d05c1d2-4470-40b5-b434-24fdaa0d9c4a.jpg" />, for the state feedback case, if close-loop system (5) is asymptotically stable under zero initial condition<img src="4-7900310x\9a824241-3b1d-4b34-bc8a-828e65b7eb20.jpg" />,external disturbance <img src="4-7900310x\6d8e49bf-68f0-4e43-8f17-2496ec57488f.jpg" /> and expected output <img src="4-7900310x\22e053e9-f340-441d-8b52-0e69190d9fb7.jpg" /> satisfy <img src="4-7900310x\34717012-ece1-4229-aa78-86a4057929bb.jpg" /> norm constraint condition<img src="4-7900310x\55e3f2aa-8f21-4d28-ab86-51290a784722.jpg" />, then,</p><p>singular plant (1) realizes <img src="4-7900310x\558c7856-9e3c-4206-b73d-c670a9108857.jpg" /> second best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\5763d0dd-4715-4411-9a8a-78e30ba7499b.jpg" /> control, the system disturbance attenuation degree is defined as<img src="4-7900310x\e60e29a9-c71f-4752-b97b-8be08e6e9c8e.jpg" />, the corresponding state control law is defined as <img src="4-7900310x\ea2069d5-0eee-4996-8acb-fa48ccc4bd4c.jpg" /> second best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\2e8ef9d9-200f-4890-ab45-aa26574db532.jpg" /> control law; further optimization make <img src="4-7900310x\eb5ae489-5381-43b7-9f29-04c323bf0900.jpg" /> minimum, in this case, the state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\c43ee539-1faf-43cc-b413-e6005f0674c2.jpg" />control law is defined as <img src="4-7900310x\a79f61a7-5106-40af-8645-65c6a9084e61.jpg" /> best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\e185fdb4-eeb9-497e-a63e-bfb6bc2c54a4.jpg" /> control law.</p><p>Define 2: Given a positive constant<img src="4-7900310x\d8cae521-c338-4557-9273-de5fc0c70226.jpg" />, for the dynamic output feedback case, if close-loop system (7) is asymptotically stable, and when zero initial state</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\e203ae2f-d196-4479-957a-0a4193df7985.jpg" />, external disturbance <img src="4-7900310x\be0e0d90-ed3d-41ac-98e4-a04a55135ae8.jpg" /> and expectation output <img src="4-7900310x\50e2d42d-07c9-498b-8312-9be494d0cbed.jpg" /> satisfy <img src="4-7900310x\69f4f43e-e1e3-4d48-8a49-0b077d276267.jpg" /> norm constraint condition<img src="4-7900310x\c864739f-7809-4d3a-85aa-c7b51a58d317.jpg" />, then singular plant (1) realizes <img src="4-7900310x\18ae7919-de01-41e5-b811-e7be60b7ce0e.jpg" /></p><p>second best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\24888f6f-b48e-4f1c-a643-dcf5831a7eeb.jpg" /> control, the system disturbance attenuation degrees is defined as<img src="4-7900310x\5ef2231a-0c4f-432a-9f00-6931fae47fdb.jpg" />, the corresponding dynamic output feedback control law is defined as <img src="4-7900310x\f1bfee1f-68ab-440b-af0b-fca9f6df47f0.jpg" /> second best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\ddcf1761-ab3f-45d2-8045-de3807a2532b.jpg" /> control law; further optimization make <img src="4-7900310x\266432c0-2247-479d-b86f-4319310b1186.jpg" /> minimum, in this case, the dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\2d2fc441-abd9-45b6-b14d-de276b3c2806.jpg" /> control law is defined as <img src="4-7900310x\5fc61eb1-e741-45c0-8edf-84a948bfd013.jpg" /> best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\1ff918d0-6b19-4ca1-86d5-31e2937e29e5.jpg" /> control law.</p><p>Lemma1: [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43069-ref19">19</xref>] For real matrices <img src="4-7900310x\8829eba9-5cec-49a5-ae8a-f0299773576f.jpg" /> and<img src="4-7900310x\cf7b0043-68a8-4129-801f-40cd76df776e.jpg" />, where <img src="4-7900310x\6bd643fb-d636-4e43-85b5-52d60af84818.jpg" /> is symmetric, <img src="4-7900310x\5971b887-8310-4e1b-9b1a-2cb8572502ae.jpg" />satisfies<img src="4-7900310x\587d436f-3356-4afb-bcc3-164b08cff843.jpg" />then below matrix inequality</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\cd057ecd-2171-45dd-8cf2-a8350a52ee63.jpg" /></p><p>if and only if there is a scale<img src="4-7900310x\f909450d-c13a-4fa0-99db-2d1c62df31b1.jpg" />, such that</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\8fe3c348-2adc-4583-b31f-f002f20c44d2.jpg" /></p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. State Feedback <img src="4-7900310x\c514a238-5cf6-4405-af01-63436dd0ca8c.jpg" /> Controller Design</title><p>Theorem 1: Without regard to the external disturbance, under the control of state feedback controller (4), if there exist positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\8e347b1a-a550-41c9-a700-3ef74bcf086a.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101537"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\ba9f8c4e-73cf-46e0-a532-6e009ea6a246.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\bb383fe0-5fab-432c-b23c-3b7060c06f83.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\a65aed30-7634-4bde-a916-a5406315a478.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\5239a4e0-11eb-4f1c-b5c0-79800d931e49.jpg" />then state feedback SNCS (5) is asymptotically stable.</p><p>Proof: Choose positive definite matrices <img src="4-7900310x\d78b4863-60ed-43db-92c0-e9622a717fd6.jpg" /> and<img src="4-7900310x\0c6a8897-1b87-4373-9319-ed804b2944d3.jpg" />, define a Lyapunov function as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\c4a44762-aff3-42ad-9342-fce25ebc663c.jpg" />.</p><p>then the forward differential of <img src="4-7900310x\9ea5078b-5668-46aa-8930-cfabb480888d.jpg" /> along trajectory of closed-loop system (5) is as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\cf0873d2-c115-495a-a8f5-8ae21ae03d47.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\0331419e-7393-4cd2-85e1-eea9d3439fac.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\c804020d-bc41-49a1-ab5c-2b9727d27d03.jpg" /></p><p>By Lyapunov stability theory, if<img src="4-7900310x\4921710d-bd67-4c5b-a688-a40dcd62b5d7.jpg" />,then system (5) is asymptotically stable, so,the asymptotically stability condition is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101538"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\178e9c15-2938-4e9a-ab88-cffb41f768a6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By Schur complement, equation (9) can be transformed as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101539"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\4749c18b-918b-4100-a3d3-e05d8f673310.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Multiplying <img src="4-7900310x\0ea084b8-ea45-4c68-8cb4-4e5b2ca9f90b.jpg" /> on the left side and the right side of equation (10), it is derived that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101540"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\95a332f8-3999-44cb-b859-28d2ae6e02a4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let<img src="4-7900310x\9a67b027-e1df-41b7-9867-610602b91d57.jpg" />, then equation (11) is equivalent to equation (8), the proof is completed.</p><p>Theorem 2: For singular plant (1), under the control of state feedback controller (4), for given disturbance attenuation degree<img src="4-7900310x\b7d9915a-e346-4716-abd2-31c899660f6b.jpg" />, if there exist symmetric positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\9abc4ff0-4181-43cd-8160-aae748a99617.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101541"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\d5d857c9-5a42-435e-93d2-e01e19810c80.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\c2806b86-1b6a-4731-bbd9-3198400e6353.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\72e8c9d6-ccce-4213-abe1-cb77f900d277.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\9f849be3-9fbc-45a0-9503-ea0af50702e3.jpg" />&#160;then singular plant (1) canrealize <img src="4-7900310x\4874b889-a7cc-41d5-bda3-6a82a0c4d233.jpg" /> second best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\40610ca4-8744-40ea-a230-e9c80adaa344.jpg" /> control.</p><p>Proof: The external disturbance is taken into accountaccording to definition 1, to make <img src="4-7900310x\ac7f67fa-c7d8-44c2-a75b-72d0db588f85.jpg" />hold, Let<img src="4-7900310x\d0994b7a-4ea5-4f4a-b5c6-495167e33ca0.jpg" />, choosepositive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\92a21050-b0c4-4ba0-a912-f3618164c5fc.jpg" />, and define a Lyapunovfunction<img src="4-7900310x\306dc383-34ad-4cc4-9d2d-c38584ee5fb6.jpg" />.</p><p>For close-loop system (5), when meet theorem 1, the system is asymptotically stable, in the zero initial conditions, for<img src="4-7900310x\5ed4d9d3-3c05-4458-bd85-a7794b4b99a6.jpg" />, it is derived as</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\493a74e6-159e-40d9-b653-a26f7c1d8e4b.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\e47774b5-ded8-4625-a99c-b6307fa6c206.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\0138d956-cbc3-4ac7-9663-aa84c868ec24.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101542"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\6757c4a8-fbc0-46e6-9b15-e6aefbbb3bae.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="4-7900310x\ff4aafee-c708-4f8d-8575-1f03042f2133.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\c8b5661b-f19c-405f-8583-ca5baebb75e8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\96bb4950-ebdc-49a2-8a75-afa925fea1e2.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\004af3b6-998a-46b2-a1f6-106f84929e30.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\0d4dfddc-e756-4718-9cd6-6469bd14f7f9.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\abd081fe-dd40-490e-9633-03788cda4298.jpg" /></p><p>By Schur complement, Equation (13) can be transformed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101543"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\0a9bd711-9b97-4b4b-b740-247431fe22d4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, further transform, equation (12) can be derived, the proof is completed.</p><p>Theorem 3: For singular plant (1), under the control of state feedback controller (4), if there exist symmetric positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\480d0deb-7b95-4d00-a28c-8b511afb795a.jpg" />, matrices<img src="4-7900310x\ebf1b0f0-8bd3-4ef2-a02b-907cf07e8a0f.jpg" />, scalars <img src="4-7900310x\74b2181f-9b07-4a5a-bf9d-b2b065912512.jpg" /> and compatible dimension unit matrix<img src="4-7900310x\f9a6d17a-de7b-4bdb-b6fd-244e36ddf92f.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101544"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\2e34ca68-31c9-4665-a233-808361c17f34.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then the disturbance attenuation degree<img src="4-7900310x\f9439047-f1a0-43b1-a9df-c8f1453d8e49.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\bd0d1e11-0181-4c18-84bd-7bd439384cd6.jpg" /> second best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\785f1f9b-7940-4f81-9b9e-0e73d899835f.jpg" /> controller is as following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101545"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\24f9392a-45c7-4562-9387-1524e611cb7c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: For singular plant (1), if <img src="4-7900310x\3e40a686-1975-472d-ba21-129e701a50b5.jpg" /> second best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\e5a72cfe-976e-435f-85d1-57b99b151eef.jpg" /> control law exists, then theorem 2 is true.</p><p>Spread out<img src="4-7900310x\4a6e5253-e4da-4203-ba91-5ea79d06fddd.jpg" />, then equation (12) can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101546"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\5a11f172-4814-4c13-a5ea-e6576662ad38.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (17) can be written as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101547"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\0807685d-7b1d-4c80-8e92-3df903e3b93e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From lemma 1 and Schur complement, equation (18) can be transformed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101548"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\26dfbbc8-eb11-4935-b9ff-9363813df776.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\97fc044a-88a0-4a8e-99be-5f2f7899d0fb.jpg" />. further transform, equation (19) is derived that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101549"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\06375b52-8b07-434e-b94c-69ff68735666.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Multiplying <img src="4-7900310x\2a66385a-68c2-4a64-b97b-0c20f09c8996.jpg" /> on the left side and the right side of equation (20), and Let</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\7e1faaf6-5678-4b7e-8651-5d48cc2f5a0c.jpg" />, and then Let<img src="4-7900310x\6efe695a-9e5a-41c5-8f86-0cbb70dd5be3.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\68ab7171-eace-4ad2-8117-ffc59827a341.jpg" /> ,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\f8f9b565-bc22-4166-aeb5-46b343c9bb3b.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\9e59c313-665f-45f6-87ad-b9fa25ca6ef1.jpg" /> , equations (15) and (16) are derived, the disturbance attenuation degree<img src="4-7900310x\3aa2350e-4403-413f-a71d-e8d306f3eeba.jpg" />. The proof is completed.</p><p>Theorem 4: For singular plant (1), if the following optimization problem has feasible solutions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101550"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\00167083-4c42-468c-bc5c-16b6e9c0cc61.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the minimum disturbance attenuation degree is<img src="4-7900310x\478d1005-aed9-4bf9-90fc-724c7d1a5395.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\390ed42d-a066-4758-8088-c28e4e694be8.jpg" />best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\0b2b8d51-09ce-4d51-a36c-378502d729e4.jpg" /> controller is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101551"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\900bfa9d-b3ab-4f38-8825-ed18ae655268.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By means of feasibility problem Solver “feasp” and optimization problem Solver “mincx” of MATLAB LMI tool-box, if the feasible solutions of theorem 3 and theorem 4 exist, <img src="4-7900310x\b5571b6f-29fc-42ff-9e29-581d9296af2c.jpg" />second best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\235bc125-68cf-4914-8ec4-f35bfa5f6f3b.jpg" /> controller, <img src="4-7900310x\adaef8d4-7f09-4989-ba10-02f730b2f07e.jpg" />best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\9db339be-8511-4803-9748-0306fbaef7be.jpg" /> controller as well as corresponding disturbance attenuation degree are obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Dynamic Output Feedback <img src="4-7900310x\6eb2b312-81be-4455-a293-54f22588dbc9.jpg" /> Controller Design</title><p>Theorem 5: when the external disturbance is not taken into account, under the control of dynamic output feedback controller, if there exist positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\d1a9c11c-8b81-4f26-a066-f7b28fdc6039.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101552"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\7accd3a5-be1d-4856-9446-0f346eb1ed23.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\f77ec9d7-816b-4412-aaf6-3ba9c5c573e4.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\6a2c95d0-af42-4946-9c98-3f216275bcb2.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\28486328-d4f8-4c33-b400-3db552b1ad00.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\b3b3d433-69a6-4ad5-beeb-5f9c7a8424a6.jpg" /> , then dynamic output feedback SNCS</p><p>(7) is asymptotically stable.</p><p>Proof: Let<img src="4-7900310x\883f6563-eed7-4abd-8e57-96288d297eb7.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\e5681268-ffe5-4201-a4b0-4512f6fa49ad.jpg" /> ,<img src="4-7900310x\42261c74-be74-41dd-9703-313cf55b3e7a.jpg" /> ,<img src="4-7900310x\42ce4883-d5d9-4ee2-8e0d-d9b429afc089.jpg" /> ,<img src="4-7900310x\a731529a-dd0f-4af1-9328-9d4d142f54ef.jpg" /> , then equation(7)</p><p>can be written as</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\9bfd5f79-d7fd-4492-9b91-4871ae91798a.jpg" /></p><p>When the external disturbance of system is not taken into account, choose positive definite matrices <img src="4-7900310x\0aefdbc3-4f01-4097-a5d5-6a9dfb440470.jpg" /> and define a Lyapunov as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\75312635-566e-4df2-a16f-d663f3ef80ff.jpg" /></p><p>Then the forward differential of <img src="4-7900310x\b8018a3b-dd2b-415f-9d0b-c44d92d27b61.jpg" /> along trajectory of close-loop system (7) is as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\41497199-68ef-4603-8679-8f616712661d.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\64619a69-fb6d-41a1-a585-741dbd9952d5.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\b900f3a3-24db-47e4-9251-e0627a38c7c8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\5e39c471-2a4d-4589-affc-9d7671eb44ba.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\e9b069a9-0a53-45f2-8942-02c6b307434c.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\07cc4fa9-a1b7-47db-ade2-3c336c189c26.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\fa7f0426-8a5b-4062-8737-d188b2daeb22.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\28460c74-b10e-438d-8aad-6ee755663b1d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\7fda2e94-fafd-409d-a703-137b5e327857.jpg" /></p><p>By Lyapunov stability theory, the asymptotically stability condition of system (7) is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101553"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\d624b70a-a16b-425f-93e7-17bddc08c2ca.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By Schur complement, the above equation (24) can be transformed as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101554"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\edf32161-d013-4862-b374-08ce907ca856.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Multiplying <img src="4-7900310x\08be37bf-c2f0-4fe7-aeb4-5092526f2c99.jpg" /> on the left side and the right side of equation (25), and Let<img src="4-7900310x\d819fc74-5535-4e24-8348-877826b3a177.jpg" /><img src="4-7900310x\6b23f433-4bdb-409b-abc4-bfecb3fca129.jpg" />, equation (25) is equivalent to equation</p><p>(23), the proof is completed.</p><p>Theorem 6: For plant (1), under the control of dynamic output feedback controller (6), for given disturbance attenuation degree<img src="4-7900310x\68f49e89-2f73-4060-9493-6abad2c549b5.jpg" />, if there are symmetric positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\3e7e730c-5f3b-4ddc-bcf3-9033a613a8d9.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101555"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\9b506c45-984b-4bce-84f1-85ddf39c65e2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then singular plant (1) realizes <img src="4-7900310x\0f1f501c-a250-4aa3-b778-3a31acaccf76.jpg" /> second best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\94850558-665c-480e-87e8-8b9adb1546ff.jpg" /> control.</p><p>Proof: The external disturbance is taken into account, by definition 2, to make the following equation exist:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\ab4253e5-c3c8-4291-bfd7-fb1d7a5c7e7c.jpg" />, we Let</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\ee9335ef-fad6-4dd4-b6e8-b9dcb0c97d3e.jpg" />, choose positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\7f6cd8a5-fdd8-4d71-b6f6-8a0605199d46.jpg" />, define a Lyapunov function <img src="4-7900310x\844f3829-75e1-4080-a916-12571095b842.jpg" /> as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\ce7004a4-5901-4144-8c04-e809a8913be7.jpg" /></p><p>For dynamic output feedback close-loop system (7), when satisfies theorem 5, the system is asymptotically stable, in the zero initial conditions, for<img src="4-7900310x\b25439ca-35ff-4b81-ab18-a3c1216c39f2.jpg" />, we have:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\254aab3b-6a3e-473e-83fb-8a3ac01ab57b.jpg" /></p><p>Let<img src="4-7900310x\bf031663-d074-4e28-9552-a17e25abc30c.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\cc06adf8-7136-4118-ba2e-d7cfc1fa0077.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\e2999048-95f3-4f13-86e9-fb4d7f18d5b2.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\4845cad3-8633-47c4-b750-881dbfd35dce.jpg" />we have:<img src="4-7900310x\65211aad-40f0-43eb-8cbf-2ca24c8ea8bb.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101556"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\91ee1338-579a-44ae-a48a-da9fc8faeab4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="4-7900310x\4b5aa0cb-200d-4042-a740-9e36a3955d2c.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\e27c2a04-a053-4d58-81b1-6f233733b077.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\acb8d4fb-383b-4dda-b923-21b600b8de65.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\ceec6008-85dc-4312-b242-6882f51584f7.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\87dd32a6-3b27-4af2-9766-41fbcc6b5814.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\3064b5c6-e180-4cb6-97a6-b27eb394a8ed.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\c1bc3b16-5b04-415b-845c-56d7412afe29.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\5517d3fc-3161-4375-895d-a8b4cf1ad6dc.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\a6a14230-855c-43a4-ae90-66e86a0bf8dc.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\eea8bb48-dce8-4e0c-bce0-2e2a4aa81ca6.jpg" /></p><p>Further transform, inequality (27) can be derived, the proof is completed.</p><p>Theorem 7: For singular plant (1), under the control of dynamic output feedback controller (6), if there exist symmetric positive definite matrices<img src="4-7900310x\c78550b2-b4b8-4f7e-b83e-2ce762e7c995.jpg" />, matrices<img src="4-7900310x\d44d03ae-c838-4752-9b1c-44278b3bd1fa.jpg" />, scalars <img src="4-7900310x\3b823401-6020-49ef-8d43-79231fb47728.jpg" />and compatible dimension unit matrix<img src="4-7900310x\e9ff8a0a-966e-4394-a3de-92f21bd3180d.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101557"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\f99eb760-8afc-4d03-9a8b-17d38dd31591.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="4-7900310x\8e0a59ce-51a6-4eef-ae33-f1ae74ff47af.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\1330041f-1956-4bc7-949a-79635647e2ac.jpg" />, then the disturbance attenuation degree<img src="4-7900310x\9c6b404a-a547-46e4-b8fd-0353138e3b56.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\487f2241-e511-4543-8395-cfba9a80c6de.jpg" />second best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\0ba65e1c-19aa-4ce4-9ebc-167746b991e2.jpg" /> control law is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101558"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\f973d5f0-a60e-4a7a-8e8c-4badc637b8cc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: if plant (1) can realize <img src="4-7900310x\21d84d4f-5947-4aba-ae71-f9a11d428ffc.jpg" /> second best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\ff8f53f5-ee67-4729-af40-045ace82666a.jpg" /> control, then theorem 6 exists. Spreading out <img src="4-7900310x\1a385c08-779b-46a2-88e4-d77ab00fc2bb.jpg" /> of inequality (26), inequality (26) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101559"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\f1432f5d-2a43-4b0e-8523-45ef66f28752.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From lemma 1, inequality (30) can be transformed as</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\7d4cc221-3d04-4e70-b627-621a69ca7763.jpg" /></p><p>Multiplying <img src="4-7900310x\36827901-586b-4a7b-b243-2a88f2c782b6.jpg" />on the left side and the right side of the above inequality, and Let</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\1f4f9d83-27ad-4404-9d4b-d6498bf47989.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\5d005e77-75f2-4f55-b95e-2c2a02c3f9aa.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\9f8129a9-6703-47a2-83f8-96687f521113.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\363676b0-bf68-47ba-bf44-4bef6aa7445e.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\9d02b8ae-0d92-4b4f-9962-b7134d628a4e.jpg" />we can obtain inequality (28). By calculating the feasible solutions of inequality (28), we can get controller parameters <img src="4-7900310x\704d1f75-8975-43df-a36e-39af90e10561.jpg" /> and equation (29), thereforethe proof is completed.</p><p>Theorem 8: For dynamic output feedback SNCS (7), if the feasible solutions following optimization problem (31) exist:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101560"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\4907ae5c-ffc5-4110-a2b1-93fa3b703ce5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The minimum disturbance attenuation degree</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\13fec90f-362c-467c-b7ab-d1877c71322b.jpg" />，<img src="4-7900310x\440cede4-fc99-425b-a064-1ad7c87651f8.jpg" /> best dynamic output feedback <img src="4-7900310x\8062f188-fa9e-495a-8f9e-7f3331c19017.jpg" /></p><p>control law :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.43069-formula101561"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7900310x\cd6f7155-867e-49a6-b0de-275c2d12f8d4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. System Simulation</title><p>To illustrate the effectiveness of proposed method, we focus on state feedback control way. A typical singular plant model with external disturbance is as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\c12826b1-53d2-4b41-a9fd-c2b2328d85db.jpg" /></p><p>The sampling period<img src="4-7900310x\04182ab0-4541-4e43-97ee-4878d382fdd1.jpg" />, the network-induced delay<img src="4-7900310x\9cefd150-5bb9-47f6-8f30-cbceb509698f.jpg" />.</p><p>Choose nonsingular matrices as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\c1971992-fa10-478e-8307-2893b06984b4.jpg" />，</p><p>The above singular plant model can be transformed as</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\6154232f-5c35-4615-8ee2-e5f0b4335909.jpg" /></p><p>Its discrete model parameter is as follows：</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\6afa0c00-c8ce-4507-bc21-e6a7ba21c9a5.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\8fca755f-7084-46f0-a3cd-84816b58de09.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\7466a111-edf4-4b19-939f-ac7d9a87f5f3.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\001d7240-a9f1-41ad-ac14-454d0c4d105b.jpg" /> , <img src="4-7900310x\fb2be576-4ccb-4669-98d7-dc3cb7d81eda.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\ea569b13-0073-4459-b293-872e4f8ea4dc.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\7f456198-fec5-4858-802e-b1a6477a38a6.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\f4b0c946-aea0-4406-9c20-f96478a0a92b.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\b07fec17-7298-4f70-8a06-86a4a7887d77.jpg" /></p><p>Choose the controller<img src="4-7900310x\d7e68e18-3080-4928-bc3b-6349232cd129.jpg" />by LMI tool-box of MATLAB to solve the feasible solutions of theorem 1, it is shown that the system is asymptotically stable. When initial state<img src="4-7900310x\f16ab7de-d83e-48f0-b0e6-92cc98b8dc50.jpg" />, the system state response trajectory of external Sine disturbance is as blue solid line shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>By <img src="4-7900310x\471a8102-2364-45e7-a484-b0b36648332d.jpg" /> control, use theorem 3 to solve its feasible solutions as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\0564cc05-c746-4672-b19d-e3ef2a2ef732.jpg" />,<img src="4-7900310x\365300da-e448-42a3-9586-3dd50e222875.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\d6b315ca-1d11-4be6-823e-02bcf3bd40b8.jpg" />, <img src="4-7900310x\f1849994-c550-4219-abc2-9f34a1af2f6b.jpg" /></p><p>Therefore the disturbance attenuation degree</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\af9480cb-8298-4124-b2cc-12b59d3eaa27.jpg" />; the <img src="4-7900310x\40980ee5-1f2a-4f00-b043-92e842406c80.jpg" /> second state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\2a587438-7dc3-4630-818c-8ae8b7de378b.jpg" /></p><p>controller is <img src="4-7900310x\df39fce6-a664-4d39-84a8-e62be671f827.jpg" /></p><p>Under the same conditions, the system state response trajectory is as black dotted line shown in  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>By LMI tool-box of MATLAB to find the optimized solutions of theorem 4, the obtained corresponding solutions are as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\acf9949f-8423-48d3-9f75-eb0b141503a5.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7900310x\536e3cf3-bc8d-4735-9019-af68b466b4ec.jpg" />.</p><p>Therefore the minimum disturbance attenuation</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\53a72226-c482-4a18-9944-9fdbd231de12.jpg" />, the<img src="4-7900310x\0f12008a-2cda-495c-ba22-e9938fbad64e.jpg" />best state feedback <img src="4-7900310x\5fdc2308-cdfc-45a3-a54f-b0711d8fe45e.jpg" /></p><p>control law is as follows:</p><p><img src="4-7900310x\480352c2-014f-42b6-82a4-8a295f09c4ab.jpg" />.</p><p>After putting optimal <img src="4-7900310x\ad9753aa-22e8-4045-8edb-6fe38caf8beb.jpg" /> into effect, the system state response trajectory is as dotdashline shown in  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Before and after optimization control, the system expectation output is as blue solid line and black dotted line shown respectively in  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>The system simulation shows that the disturbance attenuation degree <img src="4-7900310x\0073f378-be12-44e7-9893-58d08fc9e3fe.jpg" /> can decrease to 0.0591 from 35.9133 after <img src="4-7900310x\5c055375-431a-4e31-90ac-61f38ef5f026.jpg" /> optimization control, and the anti-interference performance is enhanced markedly. As a result, the system stability performance has been improved.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, when focused on network communication</p><p>characteristics and singular plant characteristics simultaneously, the <img src="4-7900310x\a07d32dc-c4e8-4106-916e-0a45d491d914.jpg" /> optimal control problems for a class of SNCS are addressed with both state feedback case and dynamical output feedback case. The network communication characteristics include the network-induced delay less than or equal to a sampling, limited input disturbance, clock-driven sensors as well as eventdriven controller and actuators. The singular plant characteristics include impulse behavior, structuralinstability and something like that. This paper presents respectively the <img src="4-7900310x\d01e5526-fff9-4ee9-8ca4-d06f29cd4c7e.jpg" /> optimal control method, the existence condition of <img src="4-7900310x\7a5e5d88-c803-4b7f-950b-110002856280.jpg" /> control law and the solving method of <img src="4-7900310x\b48cfefb-d1d6-436c-8f51-e69e7d2f4a16.jpg" /> control law and disturbance attenuation degree. The simulation results show that <img src="4-7900310x\544cb895-a4f7-4478-b5c4-0cdb5eadbdbf.jpg" /> optimal control of SNCS makes the disturbance attenuation degrees decrease obviously and makes the anti-interference performance enhance obviously. Therefore, the analytical method and the results are valid and feasible.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61074029, 61104093) and the Science Research Program of Liaoning Province (2011216007).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.43069-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Zhang, M. S. Branicky and S. M. Phillips, “Stability of Networked Control Systems,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2001, pp. 84-99.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/37.898794</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Y. Wang and C. H. Wang, “On Some Basic Issues in Networked-Based on Direct Control Systems,” Acta Automatica Sinica, Vol. 28, 2002, pp. 171-176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Wang and H. J. Gao, “Dynamics Analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207720903477952</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. J. Gao, T. W. Chen and J. Lam, “A New Delay System Approach to Network-Based Control,” Automatica, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2008, pp. 39-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2007.04.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Jiang, D. Zou, Q. L. Zhang, et al., “Quantized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for Networked Control Systems,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1025-1032.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Liu and J. You, “Observer-Based Controller Design for Networked Control Systems with Sensor Quantization and Random Communication Delay,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 43, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Liu, Q. Wang and H. Li, “State Estimation and Stabilization for Nonlinear Networked Control Systems with Limited Capacity Channel,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 348, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1869-1885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.05.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Yang, M. Liu and P. Shi, “  Filtering for Nonlinear Stochastic Systems with Sensor Saturation, Quantization and Random Packet Losses,” Signal Processing, Vol. 92, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1387-1396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2011.11.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Dong, J Lam and H. J. Gao, “Distributed   Filtering for Repeated Scalar Nonlinear Systems with Random Packet Losses in Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 42, No. 9, 2011, pp. 15071519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2010.550403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Liu, P. Shi, L. Zhang and X. Zhao, “Fault-Tolerant Control for Nonlinear Markovian Jump Systems via Proportional and Derivative Sliding,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits And Systems—I, Vol. 58, No. 11, 2011, pp. 2755-2764.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Li, Q. L. Zhang, H. B. Yu, et al., “Real-Time Guaranteed Cost Control of Mimo Networked Control Systems with Packet Disordering,” Journal of Process Control, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2011, pp. 967-975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Li, H. B. Yu, D. Yuan, et al., “Co-Design of Networks and Control Systems with Synthesized Controller,” International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, pp. 131-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. R. Duan, “Analysis and Design of Descriptor Linear Systems,” Springer, Berlin, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Z. Qiu, Q. L. Zhang and Z. W. Zhao, “Stability of Singular Networked Control Systems with Control Constraint,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, pp. 290-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1004-4132(07)60089-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Z. Qiu, Q. L. Zhang and G. Y. Li, “Output Feedback Control Networked Control Systems Based on Singular Controlled Plant,” IEEE Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Chongqing, 25-27 June 2008, pp. 5463-5466.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Z. Qiu and Q. L. Zhang, “Exponential Stability for Singular Networked Control Systems with Packet Dropout,” Control and Decision, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2009, pp. 837-842.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. P. Du, Q. L. Zhang and L. L. Liu, “Stability Analysis for Singular Networked Control Systems with Time Varying Delays,” Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), Vol. 32, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1065-1067.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. F. Wang, Y. W. Jing, S. I. Zhang, et al., “Robust  Control for a Kind of Singular Networked Control System with Short Time Delay,” Journal of Northeastern University, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2011, pp. 609613.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43069-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Xi and C. E. de Souza, “Delay-Dependent Robust Stability and Stabilization of Uncertain Linear Delay Systems: A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach,” IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1997, pp. 11441148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/9.618244</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>