<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ADR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Art and Design Review</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2332-1997</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/adr.2014.21001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ADR-43058</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  From the Trap of Difference to That of Excellence: The Women Artists, Their Works and the Artistic Field
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ourdes</surname><given-names>Méndez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Anthropology of Art, Faculty of Fine Arts, Universidad del País Vasco/University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>lourdes.mendez@ehu.es</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>02</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>15th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>17th,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>25th,</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The works produced both by ethnic artists and by women artists lead us to suspect that either the aesthetic sensibility of art experts has not evolved sufficiently or that it is not “pure” enough to free them from the load of prejudices surrounding such works and those who produce them. To illustrate this problem, we will first offer two substantially different examples. The first concerns Report No. 8 commissioned by Emakunde, the Basque Women’s Institute (Spain) and published in the mid-nineteen nineties. The second refers to the Kunstkompass, a tool used to establish the ranking of the one hundred most internationally recognised artists. Next, we will examine the four clearly ranked circles of recognition existing in the artistic field. Finally, to demonstrate up to what point the position of women artists in the artistic field is that of inside yet out, we will analyse the content of two articles published in mid-February 2008 in the Babelia supplement of the El Pa&#237;s spanish newspaper about two exhibitions of works by women artists. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Artistic Field; Charismatic Ideology; Artistic Recognition; Sociosexual Ideology; Women and Ethnic Artists</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.43058-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azcona, J. (1996). Teoría y práctica en antropología social. Bilbao: UPV/EHU.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bourdieu, P. (1977). La production de la croyance: Contribution à une économie des biens symboliques. Actes de la Recherche en Scien- ces Sociales, 13, 13-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/arss.1977.3493</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowness, A. (1989). The conditions of success. How the modern artist rises to fame. London: Thames &amp; Hudson.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chadwick, W. (1992). Mujer, arte y sociedad. Barcelona: Destino.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clifford, J. (1995). Dilemas de la cultura. Barcelona: Gedisa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guillaumin, C. (1992). “Question de différence” in guillauMin, C. Sexe, race et pratique du pouvoir. L’idée de nature (pp. 83-106). Paris: C?té-femmes. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heinich, N. (1996). être artiste. Les transformations du statut des peintres et des sculpteurs. Paris: Klincksieck.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heinich, N. (1998). Des conflits autour de l’art contemporain. Le Débat, 98, 72-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/deba.098.0072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Héritier, F. (1996). Masculino/femenino. El pensamiento de la diferen- cia. Barcelona: Ariel.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Méndez, L. (2009). Antropología del campo artístico. Del arte primiti- vo [...] al contemporáneo. Madrid: Síntesis (currently being printed).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michaud, Y. (1999). Critères esthétiques et jugement de go?t. N?mes: J. Chambon. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mosquera</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>. Algunas notas sobre globalización y curadoría in- ternacional</article-title><source> Revista de Occidente</source><volume> 238</volume>,<fpage> 17</fpage>-<lpage>30</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moulin, R. (1992). L’Artiste, l’institution et le marché. Paris: Flam- marion.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quemin, A. (2002). L’art contemporain international: Entre les insti- tutions et le marché (Le rapport disparu). Paris: J. Chambon/ Artprice.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43058-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Schwimmer, E. (1995). El signo y su lectura. In L. Méndez (Ed.), Antropología de la producción artística. Madrid: Síntesis.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>