<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2014.41003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-42333</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Geochemical Characteristics and Chemical Electron Microprobe U-Pb-Th Dating of Pitchblende Mineralization from Gabal Gattar Younger Granite, North Eastern Desert, Egypt
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>assan</surname><given-names>A. A. Shahin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Nuclear Materials Authority, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hassanshahin744@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>01</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Pitchblende mineralization was studied in the younger granite samples collected from Gabal Gattar, north Eastern Desert, Egypt using electron scanning microscope (ESM) and electron probe microanalyses (EPMA). This study revealed that this pitchblende contains significant Zr content reaching up to (66.80% ZrO<sub>2</sub>), which suggests that volcanic rocks were probably the source of such a deposit. High level emplaced high-K Calc-alkaline plutons as Qattar granite may have been associated with their volcanic equivalent emplaced in the surrounding area or now eroded. Lead content of the pitchblende mineralization is high and with moderate volcanics (up to 7.71% PbO). In contrast, it is low in ThO<sub>2</sub>, Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and REE<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. High Zr and Pb content associated with pitchblende mineralization from Gattar granite indicates that the source of this mineralization derived from volcanic magma not from granitic magma. According to the calculation of U-Pb chemical ages using U, Th and Pb content measured with an electron microprobe for this pitchblende yielded ages within 543 - 657 Ma indicating a Pan-African age for this mineralization. This is the first time that a Pan-African age (543 to 657 Ma) is recorded for a U-mineralization in Gabal Gattar younger granite in the north Eastern Desert, Egypt. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pitchblende Mineralization; Gabal Gattar Granite; Chemical U-Pb-Th Dating</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Gabal Gattar area is located in the north Eastern Desert, at a distance of about 70 km southwest of Hurghada city between latitudes 27˚02ꞌ00&quot; - 27˚08ꞌ30&quot;N and longitudes 33˚13ꞌ26&quot; - 33˚25ꞌ47&quot;E (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Geomorphologically, The Qattarian batholith is nearly of oval shape, of 30 km long in N-S direction and about 20 km wide, covering an area of about 600 km<sup>2</sup>. Wadi Al Ghozah major fault of nearly N55˚E trend divides the batholith into northern and southern parts. The area is characterized by rough, steep slopped and ragged mountainous, where Gabal Gattar, (1963 m a.s.l.); Gabal Um Dissi (1556 m a.s.l.); Gabal Thelma (1733 m a.s.l); Gabal Abu El Hassan (1550 m a.s.l.); Gabal Abu El Hassan El Ahmar (1234 m a.s.l.)</p><p>and Gabal Abu Samyuok (1750 m a.s.l.) represented high peaks in the area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The area was studied geologically, mineralogically and radiometrically by numerous authors e.g. Ghobrial and Lotfi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref1">1</xref>], Moussa and Abu El Leil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref2">2</xref>], Stern et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref3">3</xref>], El Rakaiby and Shalaby [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref4">4</xref>], Willis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref5">5</xref>], Attawiya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref6">6</xref>], Sayyah and Attawiya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref7">7</xref>], Salman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref8">8</xref>], El Kammar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref9">9</xref>], El Shershaby [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref10">10</xref>], El Sayed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref11">11</xref>], Raslan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref12">12</xref>], Wasfi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref13">13</xref>] and Abdel Warith et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Few authors studied the isochron age of Gabal Gattar younger granite, e.g. Schurmann [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref15">15</xref>] determined an age of 484 Ma for Gabal Gattar younger granites (K/Ar method), Stern and Hedge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref16">16</xref>] gave an age of 579 Ma for the granites of Gabal Gattar, (zircon analyses), Hashad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref17">17</xref>]</p><p>obtained an Rb-Sr age for Gattar granites lying within 450 - 675 Ma and Moussa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref18">18</xref>] gave an age of 570 Ma for Gattar granites (Rb-Sr method). The lack and scarcity of the chronological data for uranium mineralization prevent the correlation for this mineralization with others in the different areas in the Eastern Desert.</p><p>This paper focuses on petrographical, mineralogical and electron microprobe investigations of the pitchblende from Gabal Gattar younger granite.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geologic Setting</title><p>Geology of the concerned area is focused mainly on the younger granite of Gabal Gattar. Gabal Gattar represent the northern parts of a big pink granite batholith. This granite mass occurs as mountain terrain forming moderate to high relief hills, ridges and multi-peaks. It is composed mainly of younger granite forming marginal sharp intrusive contacts with the surrounding countryrocks which include; metavolcanics, diorite and Hammamat sediments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, after Rose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref19">19</xref>]). Younger granite range in colors from pale pink to pink and sometime show reddish pink color along fault planes and shear zones. They are massive, varying in grain size from coarse-grained pegmatitic texture to fine-grained, but medium-grained is the prevailing one and show few mafic minerals. Silicification, hematitization, Kaolinization, chloritization, fluoritzation and episyentization are the most common alteration features recognized along the major faults and shear zone dissected Gattar younger granites.</p><p>Pegmatites, quartz veins and aplites dykes are the most abundance encountered at the marginal parts of this granites. Dykes show variable distribution and composition in Gattar area. They represented by two main groups, the first group acidic dykes which comprising granite porphyry and granophyres dykes, while the second group represented by intermediate dykes which include basaltic and andesitic dykes. Gabal Gattar granite is strongly jointed and fractured. The most predominate strike direction of these joints and fractures are: NE-SW, NW-SE, ENE-WSW and NNW-SSE. Dykes are mainly extending in NE-Sw, ENE-WSW and E-W. Gabal Gattar area was traversed by several strike-slip faults trending in the NE-SW, N-S, NW-SE, E-W, ENE-WSW and NNW-SSE directions. According to the field relations, faults in Gabal Gattar area can be arranged chronologically, starting with the youngest as follow, N-S, NNW-SSE, NW-SE, NE-SW and E-W directions. Uranium mineralization in Gabal Gattar younger granite is structurally controlled vein-type (Salman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref8">8</xref>]). The vein-type U-mineralization in Central Eastern Desert is mostly controlled by fractures trending NNE-SSW, ENE-WSW and NW-SE (El Shazly et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref20">20</xref>] and Bakhitand Kassas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref21">21</xref>]).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Petrography of the Host Rock</title><p>Pitchblende mineralization occurs in the younger granite of Gabal Gattar as vein-type. These younger granites are pink to reddish in color, massive and show few mafic minerals. This granite displays in some areas hematitic alteration especially in the fault zones. Microscopic studies revealed that the rock is medium to coarse-grained and essentially composed of quartz, perthite, potash feldspars with subordinate amount of plagioclase, biotite and secondary muscovite. Accessory minerals are zircon, fluorite and some apatite. Quartz occurs as subhedral to anhedral megacrysts up to 3 &#215; 2.5 mm and small crystals up to 0.1 &#215; 0.2 mm. It is found in two generation, the older fills the interstices between the feldspar crystals, whereas the younger is graphically intergrowth with</p><p>perthite crystals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>A).</p><p>Perthite occurs as subhedral megacrysts up to 2.5 &#215; 3.25 mm. Perthitic veinlets are the most predominate type of perthite in these rocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>A). Potash feldspare are mainly perthite with few amount of microcline and orthoclase crystals. The orthoclase occurs as anhedral to subhedral crystals reaching 2.3 &#215; 0.25 mm in size. Plagioclase represents the few constituent mineral in these rocks. It is represented by euhedral crystals up to 2.5 &#215; 2.3 mm. These plagioclase crystals are oligoclase to albite in composition. Some of these plagioclase crystals show alteration to sericite in the periphery, while the core still clears preserving the twinning (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>B). Biotite represents the chief mafic minerals. It occurs as subhedral to anhedral crystals. These biotite crystals show pleochroism from yellow to yellowish brown colour. Biotite crystals reach up to 1.1 &#215; 0.4 mm, while the small crystals up to 0.4 &#215; 0.25 mm. They are variably altered to chlorite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>C). Muscovite occurs as secondary mineral associated with biotite or as interstitial between quartz and feldspars. It is found as irregular medium flakes (Figures 4A &amp; B). Zircon is found as euhedral prismatic crystals included with perthite and pitchblende mineralization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>D). Fluorite occurs as anhedral to subhedral crystals displaying distinct cleavage. It varies from colors from violet to light violet (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>E).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Pitchblende Mineralogy</title><p>Mineralogical and petrographical features of pitchblende mineralization and accompanied accessory minerals were determined from thin section through optical observation in transmitted and reflected light using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with a back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging (Figures 5-7).</p><p>Pitchblende mineralization occurs as veinlets and patches filling the fractures. It is amorphous in shape, dense and bluish gray to black incolor accompanied by significant content of zircon, fluorite and lead. Zircon occurs as euhedral prismatic crystals exhibiting its characteristic interference colors and show depleted content of radioelements. Fluorite is largely present and identified by its violet colors and distinct cleavage. Lead was identified by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and microprobe analyses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Analytical Methods</title><p>The pitchblende mineralization in a polished thin section prepared for the conventionalelectron microprobe analyses using a CAMECA SX-100 electron microprobe at the Centre de Recherches Petrographiqueset Geochimiques, Nancy, France. The analysis was carried out underthe following instrument operating conditions; a 15 kV accelerating voltage and a beam current of 10 nA. Data of microprobe analyses for the pitchblende mineralizationis listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Chemical Dating of Pitchblende</title><p>Chemical U-Pb-Th dating using the electron probe</p><p>microanalyzer (EPMA) has become increasingly popular for their it’s a relatively quick and low-cost method to obtain ages for detrital monazites and zircons using the electron microprobe analyses, but less accurate than iso- topes methods (e.g. Cocherie et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref6">6</xref>]; Pyle et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref22">22</xref>]). The principles of (EPMA) Th-U-Pb dating of monazite and zircon were first proposed by Suzuki and Adachi [23, 24], then Montel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref25">25</xref>] systematically summarized the</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Electron microprobe analyses (wt%) of the pitchblende mineralization from Gabal Gattar younger granite</title></caption></table-wrap-group><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of the CHIME dating method for pitchblende mineralization from Qattar younger granite</title></caption></table-wrap-group><p>method of EMPA monazite dating, and till now this method has been discussed in many articles published in China (e.g. Zhou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref26">26</xref>]; Zhang et al. [27,28]; Liu and Chen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref29">29</xref>]; Liu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref30">30</xref>] &amp; 2006; Dang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42333-ref31">31</xref>]).</p><p>CHIME (chemical Th-U-total Pbisochron method) dating method, which is based on precise electron microprobe analyses of Thand/or U-bearingminerals such as monazite, xenotime, zircon and polycrase (Suzuki and Adachi [22,23]). CHIME age calculation program is a computer program for the CHIME age calculation saves significantly the time taken to estimate the isochron age from a dataset of ThO<sub>2</sub>, UO<sub>2</sub> and PbO or Th, U and Pb analyses of Thand/or U-bearing minerals.</p><p>CHIME age calculation for the Qattar pitchblende mineralization has been calculated using U, Th and Pb content measured with an electron microprobe analyses  <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The data was performed using CHIME age-computer program yielded ages between 543 to 657 Ma. This is the first time that a Pan-African age (543 - 657 Ma) is recorded for a U-mineralization in Gabal Gattar younger granite.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Results</title><p>A total of 43 spot on the pitchblende mineralization were analyzed using electron microprobe analyses. Electron scanning microscope (ESM) and electron probe microanalyses (EPMA) revealed that this pitchblende contains significant Zr content reach upto (66.80% ZrO<sub>2</sub>) which indicate that volcanic rocks were probably the source of this mineralization. Lead content of the pitchblende mineralization is high and with moderate volcanics (up to 7.71% PbO). In contrast, it is low in ThO<sub>2</sub>, Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and REE<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. According to the calculation U-Pb chemical ages using U, Th and Pb content measured with an electron microprobe for this pitchblende yielded ages within 543 - 657 Maindicating a Pan-African age for this mineralization. This is the first time that a Pan-African age (543 to 657 Ma) is recorded for a U-mineralization in Gabal Gattar younger granite in the north Eastern Desert, Egypt.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Conclusion</title><p>Detailed petrographic observation, and electron scanning microscope and electron microscope analyses revealed that the pitchblende of Gabal Gattar younger granite was accompanied with high content of a number of accessory minerals such as zircon, lead and fluorite. In contrast, this pitchblende is low in ThO<sub>2</sub>, Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and REE<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. High Zr and Pb content associated with pitchblende mineralization from Gattar granite indicates that the source of this mineralization derived from volcanic magma not from granitic magma. The results given in the present study, essentially by the chemical Th-U-total Pb dating, allow us to define a preliminary age lying between 543 and 657 Ma for pitchblende mineralization of Gabal Gattar younger granite. The age obtained for pitchblende mineralization indicates that the mineralization formed in the same age of Gabal Gattar intrusion. This is the first time that a PanAfrican age (543 - 657 Ma) is recorded for a U-mineralization in Gabal Gattar younger granite.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are grateful to Prof. D. Michel Cuney and his assistance Prof. D. Marc Bround, Centre de Recherchessur la del’ Uranium, Nancy, France for all their help in microprobe analyses and interpreting the data.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.42333-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Ghobrial and M. Lotfi, “The Geology of Gabal Qattar and GabalDokhan Areas,” Paper No. 40, Eastern Desert Geological Survey, Cairo, 1967, 26p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Moussa and I. Abu El Leil, “Structural Analysis as a Guide to Mineralization Trends in the North Eastern Desert of Egypt,” Annals of the Geological Survey of Egypt, Vol. 5, No. 13, 1983, pp. 271-276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. J. Stern, D. Gottfried and C. E. Hedge, “Lat Precambrian Rifting and Crustal Evolution in North Eastern Desert of Egypt,” Geology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1984, pp. 168-172.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/ 0091-7613(1984)12&lt;168:LPRACE&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. L. El Rakaiby and M. H. Shalaby, “Geology of Gabal Gattar batholiths, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Middle East Research Center, Ain Shams University, Vol. 2, 1988, pp. 104-115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. M. Willis, R. J. Stern and N. Clauer, “Age and Geochemistry of Lat Precambrian Sediments of Hammamt Series from the North Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Precambrian Research, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 1988, pp. 173-187.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(88)90016-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Y. Attawiya, “Petrochemical and Geochemical Studies of Granitic Rocks from Gabal Gattar Area, Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Cairo, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1990, pp. 13-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. A. Sayyah and M. Y. Attawiya, “Contribution of the Mineralogy of Uranium Occurrence of Gabal Gattar Granites, Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Cairo, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1990, pp. 171-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. B. Salman, I. E. El-Aassy and M. H. Shalaby, “New Occurrence of Uranium Mineralization in Gabal Gattar, Northern Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Annals of the Geological Survey of Egypt, Vol. 16, 1986-1990, pp. 31-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. El Kammar, A. E. Salman, M. H. Shalaby and A. I. Mahdy, “Geochemical and Genetical Constraints on Rare Metals Mineralization at the Central Eastern Desert of Egypt,” Geochemical Journal, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 117-135.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. El Shershaby, “Study of Radioactivity Levels in Granite of Gable Gattar II in the North Eastern Desert of Egypt,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2002, pp. 131-135.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(02)00067-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. M. El-Sayed, M. H. Shalaby and M. A. Hassanen, “Petrological and Geochemical Constraints on the Tectonomagmatic Evolution of the Late Neoproterozoicgranitoid Suites in the Gattar Area, North Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Journal of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Vol. 178, No. 3, 2003, pp. 239-275.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. F. Raslan, “Occurrence of Uraniferous Iron Grains at Gabal Gattar, El Missikat and El Erediya Granites in Eastern Desert of Egypt,” Resource Geology, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2008, pp. 99-105.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-3928.2008.00082.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. A. Wasfi, E. L. Iliase and M. I. Mousa, “Discriminations of Younger Granitic Masses at Gabal Gattar Area, North Eastern Desert, Egypt, Using Remote Sensing Techniques,” Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 127-148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Abdel Warith, M. Michalik and B. H. Ali, “Luorine Enriched Granites: Chemical Characterization and Relation to Uranium Mineralization,” Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2010, pp. 299-323.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. M. E. Schurmann, “The Precambrian of Egypt East of River Nile Geologie en Mijnbouw,” Gravenhage, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1957, pp. 165-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. J. Stern and C. E. Hedge, “Geochronologic and Isotopic Constraints on Late Precambrian Crustal Evolution in the Eastern Desert of Egypt,” American Journal of Science, Vol. 285, No. 2, 1985, pp. 97-127.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2475/ajs.285.2.97</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. H. Hashad, “Present Status of Geochronological Data on the Egyptian Basement Complex,” Institute of Applied Geology, Jeddah, Bulletin, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1980, pp. 31-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. M. M. Moussa, “Geochronlogical Studies of Some Granitoids, Application to Geochemical Evolution and Tectonic History of the Northern Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Ph.D. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. E. Rose, “Geology and Uranium Mineralization of Gabal Qattar Area, North Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Ph.D. Thesis, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. M. El Shazaly, F. S. Bakhit and M. E. Mostafa, “Significant Structural Trends and the Relation to Radioactivity in El-Missikat Granite Pluton, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt,” In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress for Statistics, Computer Science Social and Demographic Research, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 1981, pp. 339-418.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. S. Bakhit and I. A. Kassas, “Distribution and Orientation of Radioactive Veins in the El-Erediya-El-Missikat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1989, pp. 565-581.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903893</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. M. Pyle, F. S. Spear, D. A. Wark, C. G. Daniel and L. C. Storm, “Contributions to Precision and Accuracy of Monazite Microprobe Ages,” American Mineralogist, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2005, pp. 547-557.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Suzuki and M. Adachi, “Precambrian Provenance and Silurian Metamorphism of the Tsubonosawaparagneiss in the South Kitakamiterrane, Revealed by the Chemical Th-U-Total Pbisochron Ages of Monazite, Zircon and Xenotime,” Geochemical Journal, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1991, pp. 357-376.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.25.357</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Suzuki and M. Adachi, “The Chemical Th-U-Total Pbisochron Ages of Zircon and Monazite from the Grey Granite of the HidaTerrane, Japan,” The Journal of Earth Sciences, Nagoya University, Vol. 38, 1991, pp. 11-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. M. Montel, S. Foret, M. Veschambre, C. Nicollet and A. Provost, “Electron Microprobe Dating of Monazite,” Chemical Geology, Vol. 131, No. 1-4, 1996, pp. 37-53.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541 (96)00024-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. X. Zhou, Z. Y. Chen and Z. Y. Rui, “Th-U-T Pb Chemical Dating of Monazite by Electron Probe,” Rock and Mineral Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2002, pp. 241-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. L. Zhang, R. C. Wang and R. M. Hua, “Chemical Th-U-Total Pbisochron Dating of Accessory Minerals: Principle and Application to Zircon from the Piaotang Muscovite Granite in the Xihuashan Complex, South China,” Geological Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2003, pp. 253-260.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. B. Zhang, Y. F. Zheng, Y. B. Wu, Z. F. Zhao, S. Gao and F. Y. Wu, “Zircon U-Pb age and Hf-O Isotope Evidence for Paleoproterozoic Metamorphic Event in South China,” Precambrian Research, Vol. 151, No. 3-4, 2006, pp. 265-288.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.08.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. L. Liu and J. F. Chen, “Chemical Method of Electronic Microprobe Dating of Monazite,” Earth Science Frontiers, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2003, pp. 394-394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Liu, G. M. Shu, Y. M. Pan and Q. N. Dang, “Electron Microprobe Dating and Metamorphic Age of Wutai Group, Wutai Mountains,” Geological Journal of China Universities, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2004, pp. 356-363.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42333-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. N. Dang, S. W. Liu, G. M. Shu and Q. G. Li, “Electron Microprobe Dating of Monazite and Its Application to the Metamorphism in the Eastern Tianshan, Xinjiang,” Geological Journal of China Universities, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004, pp. 477-487.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>