<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2014.22001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-42094</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Schr&#246;dinger Operators on Graphs and Branched Manifolds
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>H. Numan Elsheikh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mohnuman@hotmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>01</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   We consider the Schrodinger operators on graphs with a finite or countable number of edges and Schr?dinger operators on branched manifolds of variable dimension. In particular, a description of self-adjoint extensions of symmetric Schr?dinger operator, initially defined on a smooth function, whose support does not contain the branch points of the graph and branch points of the manifold. These results are obtained for graphs with a single vertex, graphs with multiple vertices and graphs with a single vertex and countable set of rays. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>The Schr&#246;dinger Equation; Schr&#246;dinger Operators on Graphs and Branched Manifolds;Self-Adjoint Extensions</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Differential operators on graphs and other branched manifolds have applications to the description of a number of processes in quantum mechanics and biology. Fundamentals of the theory of differential equations on graphs presented in the monograph [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref1">1</xref>], in which a number of examples of physical problems leading to the study of differential operators on graphs. In the articles [2-4] spectral properties of such operators are investigated by the dynamic properties of the evolution determined by the Schr&#246;dinger equation on the graph. In the articles [5-8] we study the set of self-adjoint extensions Schr&#246;dinger operator defined initially in the space of compactly supported smooth functions, whose support do not contain the branch points of the graph ([6-8]) or points of changing the operator type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref5">5</xref>]. Feynman approximation formulas for the unitary semigroups defined by some of the self-adjoint extensions are founded in the article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref7">7</xref>]. This article contains the consideration of the Laplace operators on graphs with a finite or countable number of edges. This article is a continuation of studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref7">7</xref>] in which we studied the graph with a finite set of edges are considered.</p><p>The relevant problem under consideration consists of recently considerable interest in the description of particle dynamics on graphs, branched dendrites and other manifolds from mathematical physics and quantum mechanics. Mathematically, the operation of differentiation function is uniquely defined for functions on region or on a smooth manifold, which needs to be clarified for the functions defined on manifolds, containing the branch point. The purpose of this study is to determine the action of the Schr&#246;dinger operator on functions defined on a manifold with a finite set of branch points. For this purpose, we define the Schr&#246;dinger operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\696c919e-8cdf-4c42-a551-d3a8f1e90794.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b1ca48a1-5348-4df1-89a3-e83f2c912c5c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> finite and infinitely differentiable functions whose support does not contain the branching points. Schr&#246;dinger operator 𝐋 on a graph is called a self-adjoint extension of the operator<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0a36ca1a-b165-4b55-b388-b57c6ab3ce90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In this article we describe the set of all operators of Schr&#246;dinger operators on a graph in terms of conditions on the set of limit values at the branch point functions in the domain of 𝐋 and its derivative. In this article we obtained the results with a single vertex (they represent a union n of semidirect with a common vertex), graphs with multiple vertices and graphs with a single vertex and a countable set of rays and the set of all operators of Schr&#246;dinger on branched manifold in terms of conditions on the set of limit values on a manifold of branching functions in the domain of the operator 𝐋.</p><p>In this article we found general description of a set of self-adjoint extensions, of the operator<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\eb21069c-72dd-4674-a020-6ed4167cebd5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, as on graphs and branched manifolds.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Formulation of Problem and Notation</title><p>We study the Schr&#246;dinger operator on the graph Γ, defining the processes of diffusion and quantum dynamics on a graph both on branched manifold. Following [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref1">1</xref>] terminology graph Γ is called finite or countable collection of smooth one-dimensional manifolds <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f2bd498f-4770-4342-b7aa-3957d9ec4d1b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (called edges of the graph), each of which is diffeomorphic to the ray <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2141fe49-18bf-4125-818f-220cdaba5b2b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or interval [0,1]. The boundary points of the edges will be called vertices of the graph. Each vertex of a graph is a boundary point of a non-empty set of edges of a graph.</p><p>Assumed that on Γ given Borel measure, we determine the requirement that its restriction to each edge <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\72e2b3d3-f881-4765-a30b-238e2bc837e1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> coincides with the standard Lebesgue measure, then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6ae40e02-50cd-4313-b777-c112e09f73be.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\acc2c233-2609-4797-901a-77bd923f559c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-vector space of infinitely differentiable complex-valued functions on Γ with compact support not containing the vertices, and operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4782973c-ed25-4d93-bc09-551c1604c84a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is linear operator defined on a linear space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\46b7465c-b624-4523-bfac-74f5f531b273.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1887"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\a0116fca-2f12-4107-859a-d4792dc608a3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which the functions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\12b78d5f-229f-40ec-ad6c-19f0d5a8c660.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1176f30e-1b6f-48fb-ac09-10533c484f92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4f628d59-18a8-4940-8f84-b1b3fcb86efd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-real-valued, bounded and continuous everywhere except at the vertex function on Γ, function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7e8c2fe2-9f57-4375-8af6-28f959f2b96e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> takes on each edge <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3e546902-394f-4a1d-a76d-7946d2857c44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> a constant value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\59c584a9-9df6-47b9-b356-a02e31c4360d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b79e211a-0044-42eb-8970-67a4a8db01c5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6cc6b964-d8b3-4315-acd6-e4a9acb0f326.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\da0d32bc-caaa-4b2a-ae49-c24ecfcc8ceb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We say that Γ is branched manifolds, if Γ defined as the union of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f574645f-aa84-40b3-8131-2324d78837dc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> instances of regions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\be242c4a-194f-4708-967b-c04e1a9cd1a0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1426efb3-8978-4061-aac8-6ef3e52cc2fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c2e67ba2-e55d-4dae-b937-9bd91fdbc8c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>we assume that for each 𝛼 region <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\98c847a3-85ea-4dbb-b90f-073449152755.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d37f6d73-7d54-465b-b8ef-f448155790ae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-dimensional bounded domain in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e416e469-462e-4b1e-9ae6-1eb1a5a9bbdd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\184ab0f1-63f7-4d2a-bcac-6c0c9ac6dbe3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> dimensional smooth boundary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8d4df74a-82b1-488d-ab8f-53af0a6b9f96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The boundary of the manifold Γ is defined as the union of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\35d05807-5a40-4f02-b447-72d2c649c381.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> instances of boundaries regions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c7430216-4082-46e7-878f-0f27cc05fda8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\60a94da3-978a-4d44-bfb4-4987104530a0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cf60c5e9-1a83-454d-a88a-aafb2ef361c4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called a branch point of the manifold Γ, if it is a boundary point of at least two different regions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\333c0d62-2167-4960-89d1-f2b80eb02134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0f34da95-0b33-4190-8897-9a78aa517586.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Assumed that on Γ given Borel measure, we determine the requirement that its restriction to each regions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\36c88a22-935c-4a99-b894-a8c9373d54c8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> coincides with the standard Lebesgue measure space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c424b678-de88-4e4c-839f-7693b55715ca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Then the space of square-integrable in the Lebesgue measure on the set of complex-valued functions Γ admits the representation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a682bece-ea00-4c7d-8b62-c46dc0f5e47e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f83f4904-f984-49f4-af9e-a810a0c0de33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-vector space of infinitely differentiable complex-valued functions on Γ with compact support not containing branch points of the manifold, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ca63d020-a604-45fe-bf3a-a6253c650641.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-linear operator defined on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b2c73776-6dc9-4ddd-bbce-a59e8d05bb11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by relation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3f09f0f0-94f0-4030-98cc-25e811136dce.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1888"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\918b877e-9bfb-4780-8b87-3533d9bc36f4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which the functions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\12f6d41b-8f50-4033-a930-5b7cf3bae733.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7c0d6130-c87d-4b05-801d-44bd8ed616ae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\792490c0-5a6c-4756-a88e-6985be9f31cf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-real-valued, bounded and continuous everywhere except at the branching points of Γ, function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5cbc4aba-6f2e-4cea-94d9-1f80c889c2a7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> takes on each region <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9796aa4a-2266-4eb0-9525-de5299ef3e23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> a constant value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\eba5603c-6bda-4027-b49d-4dc75e237907.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bba21017-c780-4981-922a-14844a3ddf52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a0b3cee9-719b-4db9-b8c9-319a5bac96b1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e8eeb48a-d13f-4e56-907d-7704264321d8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a285084b-9d38-4ab6-a3fb-88274c97122b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-restricting a function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\97a78971-9b37-424a-802c-d25ee27c5717.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the region <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2bd21eca-f69e-4164-9dd0-466345ff6323.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Definition: The linear self-adjoint operator 𝐋 in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\39debee4-8f87-4609-a920-b19c94531c72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called Hamiltonian of quantum system with mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b95fb5c6-22bd-427f-ad2e-5a2666612414.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the electromagnetic filed <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4950e6de-90ea-4060-9049-84d34000bebd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if 𝐋 is self-adjoint extension of the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\855b7415-00d6-4bca-b30c-56bfb455d519.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>We investigate the properties of the Cauchy problem for the Schr&#246;dinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1889"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\48d5961f-0bb9-4995-96b9-badd9c7848a9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the initial condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1890"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\d2e4f88e-e6cf-4abd-9185-a2aca979a0b7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here 𝐋-symmetric operator in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a067291b-207f-46c6-8ac7-5736b058ae03.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an extension operator of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ce9fce37-d15a-4e28-baff-f16024c306ed.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, given on linear manifold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a9bd8d32-66aa-423c-b29d-8b103673d270.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the equation (2.1) or (2.2). The purpose of the article is to describe the set of all self-adjoint extensions of the operator<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d0b5bed2-6110-44da-91a2-bc9977233b51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, that may act as generators of the unitary group of the Cauchy problem (2.3), (2.4) for the Schr&#246;dinger equation.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Graph with One Vertex</title><p>Graph Γ with one vertex, is defined as the union of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b6ece6aa-4bb1-4ea6-8e15-2d5d3cb1fc8b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> instances of semidirect <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e83f4e04-dee6-4544-b0a9-66f09c5b109a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\31faf8fb-2051-4e0d-9c8d-49be3e33e8a1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with a common origin<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ec50b67f-e3aa-407c-bafd-a27f3b1acd96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, called the vertex of the graph. Assumed that on Γ given Borel measure defined by the requirement that its restriction to each semidirect <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1932fc81-8faf-40bd-9633-2c2b42ce47ef.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> coincides with the standard Lebesgue measure, then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\51b16c54-c981-4de8-939d-89a8e430a5d2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ac519933-3810-4e72-96f6-fa09a3146371.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-vector space of infinitely differentiable complex-valued functions on Γ with compact support not containing the point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\68345f19-a7eb-4719-bb80-7fe1be2642b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1fd0d502-debe-46ea-888e-dba2f62c3abc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-linear operator, defined on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\97030e2e-afc4-4fb4-84ee-93c171ab6d8b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the relation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\587a19ea-c284-496f-bc7f-2aa88042a080.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\98658c73-a2c1-4a3a-8c45-ac7055911971.png" /></p><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\110aa4e6-8a5f-4140-b6a4-546c0d58f038.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-restriction of a function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cc6441f7-2096-4dc0-b8bd-6d47548663b1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on semidirect<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f0175ae2-fa99-4d80-95db-25cfc264461d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Assumed that for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cd537d95-d84b-4115-a38c-519573314efd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> number <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\86cdd635-7400-4448-82a9-2b09af4a6fdc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1ba7d0af-d8a6-4034-8d3a-428139aaa116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cfab8cb2-d965-484a-ac46-f0114afe26b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we denote in the point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\99a4f659-9198-4828-81c5-9a3ea7a91482.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bbeb4ebf-ab03-453b-899d-762e7d845528.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with domain of definition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d5c18720-ea64-44ee-abf4-34fd8ebc8cae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is densely defined and symmetric. The domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c0393836-ac38-4f23-a185-6bb80032c3ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> adjoint operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5466ee8c-a526-40c9-b2ea-6b40bc6c57f9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a linear subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0614ef29-cf90-4998-909f-cb168fe58b37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>The restriction of any function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bcd84aad-4803-41ca-a42c-19718726a0e8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on semidirect <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ea2cebd1-51db-4836-bd7e-c0575ff4e90a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ca1e3dcc-6ae2-406c-802c-baa337f32f23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> possess boundary values at the vertex, which we denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\36acabef-1be0-4d86-97f9-abeaa928c2c5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where the symbol <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8019baf8-101c-4c3d-ba71-54061ff58ea4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> means <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\42740d7e-3e9f-4be7-b9f7-afb439b350fd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> This is also true for the first derivatives of these restrictions, which use similar notation.</p><p>Von Neumann theorem ([9,10]) provides a description of a set of self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators. We obtain an explicit description of a set of self-adjoint extensions of the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\57cb9662-a3d4-419d-bb11-2543faa2bf53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in terms of conditions on a linear subspace in the space of boundary values</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\41316eb2-a2be-49ac-9cbe-2762a8a7594a.png" /></p><p>Theorem 1. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bbcbd71f-75f1-46bc-892b-44e8dc327748.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\26767431-9a18-4303-b885-44715c50b792.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\089630d7-d525-458e-a709-c8b3f26b24a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> The operator 𝐋 with domain</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\ca4b047d-df47-4943-a587-d06df7a0b23c.png" /></p><p>self-adjoint if and only if the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9b3de742-1ad3-4188-9d9d-640e5f08b70b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\747f2571-23eb-4aa0-95f1-73e3633feebf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5b7ed240-e12c-4dd9-8781-cd3a96adac75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7be18aa5-ccf7-4ea7-85f6-a500247501cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\1c9ee542-2bb5-41fc-895b-4f3736a2c013.png" /></p><p>Hence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f3ba2f1d-0f48-410c-a0f8-c9e8b712b0ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\aa9b3b3f-9128-4341-843b-ba3d40067d0a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values, therefore the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6b610e39-8169-44c3-8d9e-314f68dea6c5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d429d7b4-a192-4ef8-9791-5d977d1f25ff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which proves Theorem 1.</p><p>Corollary 1. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fadc0eec-bb75-4058-b852-aca2c370e7c5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c2576412-5fc8-49e2-a6bc-07b6dd35f28e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-diagonal matrices and the matrix elements are defined by the formula</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\06fb1cc3-e0c2-42f5-b0aa-4ef12b425d74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2bd9594e-0c0c-4ce9-87d2-d8d92f4ddfc2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\68469747-ae39-466a-b504-196ca91aa31c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>respectively, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9fb6ff0f-2d38-4b97-a851-c33667d1ed7d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ed2d85e6-7f6e-4a1c-9c5a-95b610709a84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then the operator 𝐋</p><p>with domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8ada6def-94e9-4210-82c1-95e6fbb44988.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> self-adjoint if and only if the matrices <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d924d4c0-e255-40fe-810f-8b835d666455.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\659ad8f7-95c2-4371-bec0-0c6d52f4a2f2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\038a5539-49ef-4d9e-9fbd-39974be36f4f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\57c727c1-0c72-4371-ae44-520b3b778586.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a4fe158f-fd2b-4bb9-a1f1-79f15d2e31e8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\eb0b886a-50c6-4e8d-9c50-218370a38ccd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\8f136f2a-ae66-4170-a247-6de983014777.png" /></p><p>Hence</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\45f34f67-b12c-4985-a23b-a07085ff9932.png" /></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\92ff45eb-2faa-4848-b15d-21217a49c703.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values, therefore the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\45545225-a600-480b-888c-21f836e03993.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3bb93fc7-e8ef-4981-a52b-d5aaeae968ef.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which proves the corollary 1.</p><p>Theorem 1 gives a description of a wide class of self-adjoint extensions of the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\85ed8828-7c22-44b9-8429-0a9c4003954a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> but does not describe the totality of self-adjoint extensions. This makes the next theorem.</p><p>Theorem 2. The operator 𝐋 is self-adjoint if and only if its domain of definition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\58d1a3eb-dae5-4542-9525-eacfc29ad875.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> consists of the functions in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6e311d84-e75c-4716-b264-aa1fa393e6e2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boundary values satisfy the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ba320eba-de27-490a-9d51-02eb3725ceb6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where rank of the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\23dab8d3-be88-4d8f-a350-aa06bfe094c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> equals <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a233421d-c59a-4cd8-86a7-cc627473d000.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the matrix is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0ebb2ff2-1cd3-40be-b90d-06526c6b4ceb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is self-adjoint: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e4797dc4-aaa3-48e3-b6d7-15ab32b7df3a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0c84bfd0-cc33-424c-8be3-dd02b5d22cad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2d5c2490-02c7-4ec1-93ff-412eb62bd985.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e0984152-c1a9-4e4a-a821-10e522c5caeb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\70343588-4ef3-4c66-bc3c-1d94761457a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> set of solutions of linear equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1891"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\3c0a52f2-ee16-438b-a265-ff477ae9ea00.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5209bc3e-d095-4db8-be73-24a247d0173e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the fundamental matrix and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\df88f121-1de0-480a-a9f8-d1a10d40f9c0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a matrix of independent constants. Substituting each of the solutions of the fundamental equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8248b5fb-88bd-45b1-95f2-2ccba3e1b045.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> specifying the domain, we obtain by following the relation of the fundamental matrix, with the matrix of the system of equation (3.1)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1892"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\1013f7f2-92e3-4536-937c-d3ff1a242c05.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\62c6f5bc-25cf-4fa4-870d-4ffba10d582f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and domain of the operator 𝐋 defined by a system of equation (3.1), then for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\97c3aa31-8bea-415c-8e5c-2c7dafaf1ad7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> rightly the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\7b80414c-fc94-4156-8d0d-b2a640b2933e.png" /></p><p>Element <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\184cf939-e92b-4697-b0b6-63cbf2471cb1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1893"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\6b063339-cd3b-45bd-b851-2471816f2c8a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1887567a-2f12-4111-acbd-393d9ae52c23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-basis in the linear <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c0c179af-cd3a-435e-8b7c-321afbc2c29e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then each column of matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3c8af934-0df7-4250-a85a-8eb8e305c7f8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies</p><p>(3.3), and therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1894"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\88e5c9c4-c487-46aa-8c07-d77f2ec651e9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Of (3.2) and (3.4), it follows that the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7ef8ea2f-4446-42ce-833b-d39b7cd12618.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be selected <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0b60c847-9388-4320-af58-d42448b2d925.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The operator 𝐋 is self-adjoint if and only if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a79526bc-0f4c-4127-b21a-57b54bfe2dea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c6a2f0e2-9249-4282-a946-5ae7c2b32c59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-matrix of the columns of the basis vectors in the subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\65af16d2-59cf-4b92-a092-4e94f4a14a0e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2f3f3c93-e251-4c43-b488-fe4449030d2b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if and only if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\37a84fe1-18e3-47ec-99bc-bb899c98cc13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is also the matrix of the columns of the basis vectors in the subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\32117634-4a3e-43dd-938c-7311f25f2316.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that is, any of its column satisfies the system of equaation (3.1). And this is equivalent to the system of equations <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ee3550f5-7ae0-4436-9074-066fb2cc3d91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which proves Theorem 2.</p><p>Theorem 3. The operator 𝐋 is self-adjoint if and only if its domain of definition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0acc2e97-e61f-4123-afb4-b6b4bc0af603.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> consists of the functions in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0dc8bf63-f737-4f82-813a-bc4b40044de7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boundary values satisfy the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\214d41a2-9c26-44d4-86e8-177f5a97f54c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where rank of the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3dd6ef68-7e47-4f29-94b6-40ac1b30ba04.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> equals <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\008c35e4-c9b9-4cba-a6d2-8fc8730f640f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the matrix is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\62fff8f1-5684-4bc6-aaef-fc4cdf0ffd10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is self-adjoint: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\147a3947-b9d7-428a-9fa3-17cd61e1cfe5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5ec815d7-c255-4b2d-8555-f6d371b22255.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\52b1461e-5d39-4b36-810d-957ac3c632e7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\dea9bcd7-59fd-4401-bd40-0057b33b6d08.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ac2ead16-f607-4992-844f-8bb2e6cfe9c0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> set of solutions of linear equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1895"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\a1bbed92-1fa4-478e-9886-a5edff699409.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8946c6c6-252f-4fa5-9be6-e712be7b3261.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the fundamental matrix and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ccb9a0c6-70d1-4bc1-8964-7bbbef9ea0b7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a matrix of independent constants. Substituting each of the solutions of the fundamental equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b120226a-70b0-4d01-95bd-053eaffe606a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> specifying the domain, we obtain by following the relation of the fundamental matrix, with the matrix of the system of equation (3.5)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1896"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\47046b5d-4e7a-4921-9113-cb7889d9ef68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\68bb73dc-d7a2-4df9-90dd-b4711f466a41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and domain of the operator 𝐋 defined by a system of equation (3.5), then for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\55aed47e-0d25-432c-bad4-5019e77804b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> rightly the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\73ccc50b-6f14-441c-95e6-29bf65651c2e.png" /></p><p>Element <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\dfa6c539-75b9-4624-880f-22e38a34e13b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1897"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\a428223c-b05d-4b8c-b518-42d39c3f4fa7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\924b8cfd-ea14-4b0f-aaf7-90c9373d07c7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-basis in the linear <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d854971f-5441-4c02-bb76-32ee90e803b8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then each column of matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\093c7ee7-dc9c-4d71-8728-02c59d71a9d8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies</p><p>(3.7), and therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1898"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\88a94694-cb8b-482e-b3d1-9b55613ab523.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Of (3.6) and (3.8), it follows that the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d5bc07af-6271-4d7d-8ce2-48cd2f82170e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be selected <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\248d5e2f-3b65-4847-963e-2d3b15eddbfa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The operator 𝐋 is self-adjoint if and only if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6573d56b-4338-4d20-91ab-c6bcb8babfd4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\eaec2205-b5ee-45f8-aa47-4f8d4e608ae3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-matrix of the columns of the basis vectors in the subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8ba8932b-148f-439d-8866-d8119ea01a6d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\229f8a64-1862-494a-ade1-78c9f790358f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if and only if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\87ff4a13-f358-4676-9dc0-1755ae6c1708.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is also the matrix of the columns of the basis vectors in the subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d83e28ea-acd1-4285-89c0-0ab385115b8f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that is, any of its column satisfies the system of equation (3.5). And this is equivalent to the system of equations</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\f380fc91-4cf4-4c2a-b03c-913b9c70ccf6.png" /></p><p>which proves Theorem 3.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Graph with Multiple Vertices</title><p>In the present article, a graph with multiple vertices is understood by one-dimensional cellular of complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref3">3</xref>]. Let graph Γ, be a collection of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c893308e-14e8-4f50-89b5-e8fa1d28064c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> vertices <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\73076866-1b8d-46e1-80ff-2396458210c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from each of which proceeds <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1542df2d-6af7-497c-bf80-6dd341a5b0d4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0add27b9-ef0f-4fd4-8f41-dbfc7ac82c48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> edges <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\65a77227-b448-469c-a8ee-afb272794428.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> representing the infinity semidirect or line segments that connect vertex <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a8c69a74-cae5-413b-b807-52b2c6363d74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with other vertices. We fix on each edges <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\353f5920-b2a3-4afe-a465-0f394d32b03f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> parametrization of the natural parameters. In this case, the edges of semidirect parameter increases from the boundary points and the edges of intervals, the orientation is chosen arbitrarily. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\652af080-7a7c-4967-9b0d-e1f80a77b01f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-initial point of the edges semidirect, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6b5b59bb-3def-436e-9782-3152a0e2062d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-initial point of edges <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2de32a94-519e-4492-81d0-2a247e6e2c24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> interval, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d4d169aa-dce6-4340-ad9c-b436d177e506.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-end point of edges <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0c454a9d-e8c4-44b9-99fc-3a03a807824e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> interval. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\33493f1e-b1d9-475b-a4ca-d7fc9837614d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-the collection of all boundary points of the edges <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\23f7cd7d-3ef0-4fc6-9fe6-53a6f7eecab0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We define the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f8b477dc-d679-491f-8f52-c9ce2b1a9594.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\326ff7ae-45ba-46df-8d2d-c998d0f12df4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6eaf323b-8df0-462a-9574-81fcd008337e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a19f47b4-630c-461e-a72d-b386bf316f6e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-beginning of edges and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\58b905dd-acb5-4ca0-bbd4-5eb957a13bd1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f720057c-7b0c-452b-bd4e-1f0e3f16409d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-end of the edges, denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a38db63f-506b-4b18-859b-73c80bf61b86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> diagonal matrix with numbers <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f72af367-f2dc-4621-a1b0-71dd096820ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the diagonal.</p><p>We introduce the operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a3aa7d65-0e34-40f9-a5e9-a7c2a16b9a2c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cab3f984-4e80-43c2-86a5-d75e24baf86e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\27217c80-9bbc-468d-b440-b900c18d7c43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of boundary values of functions from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e546f542-2645-43c7-bcc9-472474ba9380.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and their derivatives, linearly isomorphic to space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\65e3552f-e443-4808-bf0b-63fc026ca477.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Through <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2225a36a-72e7-4c7d-ac61-e69c5f1d54d1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we denote the collection limit function values on edges of the boundary, which is the point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\01b8a665-5e82-4118-afca-1ddbb58d73ec.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7981177c-d39f-4683-943f-501c61937736.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\26cdac2d-0746-485d-8b78-0a01087762a6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-dimensional vector of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a30a1990-1589-47c3-8678-5c41b58742f8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the vector limit values of the derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ea862543-cf13-4d16-a47b-e7524dcfc9ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> use similar notation, and let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\02a10269-6b3c-4fdb-a6ac-bd5a8660ac32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denoted in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\46edbf09-41a4-4bb4-9941-fe1c9e5fdd20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Theorem 4. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\17583474-adde-402f-8754-9d84992899ec.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6b551def-7708-4ffd-9287-587fe1a53b5b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\428442b9-861b-474f-a3e0-e69fdde46716.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> The operator 𝐋 with domain</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\0f1941a2-189b-4ec9-a83e-19ba7130154f.png" /></p><p>adjoint if and only if the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\269361e0-13ae-44b3-ad49-acbcafd7e6e1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9565fd5d-231c-4c1a-bdaa-dfc9fef86ba4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\82bbc2ff-3f57-4f69-bdc9-c4ce22145dc8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a821736b-4c2a-422c-9d72-ee409b3a4770.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\0660b413-2032-4f90-9196-32fa7f350da7.png" /></p><p>Hence</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\ac8258c7-d31f-4576-8eda-2e4fe4ed0dd8.png" /></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\30ce570b-25ce-4a2c-9a50-4e11b3a291cd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values, therefore the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0834d299-10ef-40c8-a566-e949f094c666.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b0499399-60dc-4a3c-b511-b2b7ab376e53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which proves Theorem 4.</p><p>Corollary 2. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1725719c-80c1-4021-bec2-b5d96da623a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6fdd5bc2-a924-4dcd-a764-7392646d1f3f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-diagonal matrices and the matrix elements are defined by the formula</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a29f82ae-d031-490a-9c15-c960417a88e1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\918c5bad-b897-4b65-afce-0293faf992eb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4c2ad69c-4f74-40eb-8197-2b8fd70ac1db.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f40d28f5-56e2-47bb-9d0f-cb1aceab68c4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ff7239e0-d66c-4994-a864-cb8b27c33973.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then the operator</p><p>𝐋 with domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8bfe189d-ef83-4f73-bbb2-417c3e7177cd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> self-adjoint if and only if the matrices <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0f771104-aee8-43af-b71a-d097f4326b9c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\23396c03-ad4e-455f-9ca9-3064b1f5d5d3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\030550f8-1d48-4665-a1a3-f852ef048f49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fc4ff3f6-647c-48eb-91ad-273fba9024ba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\755bd6e6-3e9f-4e5c-823f-1329dddc06cf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ad0c1f4f-5ab3-4508-bdcc-bbcc5f950e56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\7fb18e80-ba18-4d29-b4a5-42b9153636be.png" /></p><p>Hence</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\ce217104-e84b-447b-bfd0-03576c1ffdbd.png" /></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f4fbf40e-68a6-4b0e-8eee-25f90763db5b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values, therefore the equality<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ce994a20-a8b2-4b57-a67a-aa34cc185464.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b7f0ddc4-5182-4b93-b67e-329e2b591d21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which proves the corollary 2.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Graph with One Vertex and with a Countable Set of Rays</title><p>description of this graph is defined by the following structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref11">11</xref>]. In this case we denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\45f66598-6c74-4b7e-af79-6e015540b81e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-locally finite non-negative countably additive measure on N such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cbad2975-7b0d-4d95-b1e4-999f9d123857.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denoted by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\98a94916-1ed6-4325-897c-23ce7d1ed8b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>—Hilbert space of boundary values with the norm</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\c7cfe340-cb71-4170-a9db-4c6af53ed078.png" /></p><p>The restriction of any function on semidirect possesses the boundary values at the vertex:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9c799882-f347-442d-87f4-32e62632a3ff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>This is also true for the first derivatives of these restrictions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\794b1d32-781e-4099-93c0-00e25972d00e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3549cd13-15ac-44f1-8ec6-57edee701701.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a8e64805-95d1-4414-99f1-eb1311463ee8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e0a9f939-d150-4d08-8b4a-c252c7add4a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> diagonal matrices and their matrix elements are given by the formula <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\74052f25-b06e-4426-9468-b094fa084aa6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fbf8a0ea-0f93-45f6-aecf-ae570c1c84ef.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f54965ee-6f79-48dc-87d6-887dc7e60154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively.</p><p>Theorem 5. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3f32a3eb-706f-4485-8107-8ec0b3eb33a2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3556fd12-29b9-4001-9ee6-66da8a68097f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7c63c6c9-b40d-44b1-bcc7-876d326b49a8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\232cb8f2-15fe-498e-b5d9-99d36e28bb36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> The operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0002fca5-24f5-4aab-a105-0aecc3136a0c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with domain</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b7f30371-65d9-4870-ac72-0cc0c1138f85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>self-adjoint if and only if the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7ff6ce1a-c606-407a-9579-44f348031f91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is self-adjoint in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9b2186be-0670-45b1-9350-03ee5278f774.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0e580269-069a-40fb-9234-2fe77bd4fb7b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a1118054-7b6b-4c93-bef3-9084f1e480f6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\1cb47d77-81eb-47aa-be80-62f458a9e39b.png" /></p><p>Hence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bc97d90a-ae3f-4284-ac54-d92a2079995e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0c796284-ab5e-4cc4-a345-b0ca5fe743fd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\13f03622-7592-42ac-995e-181e973d4488.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> therefore the equality</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4adf0d92-af75-4a9b-bcc5-027095e9f72b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0e8d1b0d-8023-4883-abe8-439070b7f702.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which proves Theorem 5.</p><p>Corollary 3. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\aa64bb55-7394-41af-8396-93f00e32c9ff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e7c162b2-e2df-444c-b5dc-856c8ce3568f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1659ee29-6818-4cca-91cc-1d0ca8daa971.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a9417bc3-87e3-40de-8af2-b0d01c0c8991.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9f603a2e-433f-48fb-a022-9bb3e252a27a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are operators in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fc7a6aaa-1ffb-4d56-b2d6-0145e56695ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by diagonal matrices with elements <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3649a590-2b20-4e27-b056-0f52369c77cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fb3a2f0d-206e-4cb7-8266-7b3472ebfee8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7f51cbc1-e3ba-477e-ae7d-0231fc8ee9be.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the diagonal, respectively, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\97c36a01-bfe6-4889-a769-93c801fdf663.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>where</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b5b7a1e1-783d-4c1b-b60a-2afc9c69346e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Then the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\789dc6e0-59b6-424a-9608-469926f2341e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\94a0883f-9198-4791-adcc-cbab42d4bbdd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> self-adjoint if and only if the operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\12f188c4-c469-4c60-a9e5-cfee12cad464.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ada861d7-20ce-4167-a2b4-71664e4685ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8aae5871-d2f5-4369-8711-6b68f4a0b5f0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> acting in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\dbccdaa8-474e-40cc-a0b9-edb85ae4a3f0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the equality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.42094-formula1899"><label>(5.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\1-1720076x\a076b1ce-6640-4d5f-b48b-e8a68cba4f61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cf6788a5-a426-4cff-9a03-52e338d91449.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e3d43711-1078-4a28-b238-eb7a70d1b0ff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\09b68496-ef76-42a5-b6e2-f40ca5a877d3.png" /></p><p>Hence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\dbdceb47-4d9b-4876-94bc-b630d08b6201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\54510c3e-bbaf-431a-a2ae-467c46167024.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\c30c0129-8d63-449e-8f34-935dae4e43b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> therefore the equality</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2c1ec027-8d20-4b00-82aa-ed01a471dbb4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6e33f787-459d-46e0-ac5c-a2aef59f4433.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\879054d9-c626-4ade-ba0f-9b3970daabab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if and only if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e91f680d-9312-46cc-ae7f-8232a23282f2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then for the self-adjoint operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4df3778c-37d6-4025-967b-edd747565267.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient to satisfy the equality (5.1).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Schr&#246;dinger Operators on Branched Manifolds</title><p>The assumption<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9e02ad2c-a9be-4d56-9e9d-0361d7f15975.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let the function m takes the constant values <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\330fa212-adfb-45a5-85ae-e86621090440.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on each region <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\501f6520-f6e2-4e8b-87af-8d37c952b7b1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\91eb0324-1c19-407a-8511-bd6ff457a518.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and satisfy condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\251e897c-ad99-4249-bbec-a2b0bd15f5c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\64f17e0d-21b2-4b3f-9791-a97bbd3a532b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Through <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2479c29b-9890-4f60-bff7-8e53c78f8ae8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we denote the limiting values of the vector function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9aee7434-4218-4ab7-9855-65ea5969986c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the boundary <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f4a8ed1e-9075-442a-99b2-2e293f8877f5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e2059b2b-58f3-41ac-ae50-e848ecaa6ac0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a9a30040-7d5e-486c-a9b9-e90a363b0eff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> densely defined and symmetric. The domain</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4f221666-3a95-473d-b8a5-ee87f3a345d2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>adjoint operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1e7422b8-de88-40b4-b483-1e2ef44a5bb0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a linear subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f245e33f-a81f-4fc5-833e-791e8c2f2cc4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Let the components <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7f020d26-e834-44f7-8a63-ae5d90edc89f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> manifold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\00ba4b9c-c5c9-45b8-b8fd-541a75c19c76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> constitute a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\97ea8753-7c47-4780-b1f9-65eeb99fcef0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> semidirect, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\e02cddbe-96ad-4c10-87a7-b08940d3c161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>finite intervals and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bceed4a4-4f19-4ef5-b207-2c3a2bafa379.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> regions. In the case of one-dimensional region <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5c5ecd2b-d8e9-47ef-93e0-ccf4c42fa256.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boundary value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\92975010-5034-4d80-94ec-86238ef2ce73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a set of complex numbers on the boundary <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\36eca916-d52b-4732-86aa-e4f07951e9bd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents one or two points. In the case <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\95bb3e44-41dd-4b77-aa5b-2eb495e3c3c8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boundary value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4f2436e2-8ef1-47a6-a727-f181bd10f7ba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an element of the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a827b0d2-8e1d-45a3-8f1f-827a5f9a8e26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> According to the trace theorem <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cc8bed62-9350-4bf0-b27a-904a4c520df1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref12">12</xref>]). Through <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\544163b5-e17b-4ac7-80b7-5752ee425137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the collection of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6d902ac8-8f1c-4e94-9f70-a6534f15760d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> limit values function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8d109793-f0fb-4ff5-8f25-3c97be52d5b5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the boundary <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ffd30b0a-d1c3-447a-a9f8-52960fac881d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Similarly, the limit value of the derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\6e010be1-a6c0-4e9d-8eec-d4a9b93de635.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> constriction <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\2f9a0e90-e815-4541-995a-338868098787.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the direction of the outer normal <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1bfe29b8-8fda-4941-a613-131de2356ff0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to boundary <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\832e7390-b45c-4990-b7ce-027ae2eaf918.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the case semidirect <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bff49bba-ca0a-4dda-8260-34e680404807.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents a an element of space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\778536ea-9c87-4154-8bff-ff1ffe1dd83f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, in case of a limited interval-element of space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9d48b458-1799-45b5-a2df-089e4269184d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and in the case of dimension <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a2a10e85-46cb-43c7-884e-c2bb5cae69e4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-element of space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\0cb71f6f-5832-467d-842f-e5b61a6e422b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The boundary values of the normal derivative is denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\75d788e1-480d-4499-a842-408079e6c6a7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a8ae9abd-3c72-49ad-a345-0bc26583905d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is vector of the external relative to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\31df84f1-730f-4584-ae98-421ee2eb15b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> normal to the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5f3d5c09-5c90-4003-b781-48916642bff0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a7326970-6e1e-4530-aa5a-67037363eefc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>We introduce the Hilbert space</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\9a0c1487-b288-454c-a46a-a02d68f1cc05.png" /></p><p>We define space of boundary values <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\75c5d0dd-66ed-4ef4-a185-f12a8f3ec74e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7ae91ec9-b748-4eae-a633-7118f966e652.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and similarly, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\06f8db45-bdcf-46eb-85dd-74e9b31885c2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Boundary value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\15a18d49-a6c8-40ed-98f8-9726cf63771d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\871d66d2-cbbc-46d5-93cd-c8fc74d05eb0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an element of the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f7f59edd-dc10-4704-9b03-81245e6e94c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the boundary value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\92a90076-bcc3-4be0-92ac-960a50188b16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> its normal derivative-an element of the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\7b0792d9-c724-4c0a-9d12-26816ec8aa6b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>We introduce in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5805a133-e7a8-48f2-a89b-43b56340ef3d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\bec147aa-1ea9-4861-a90f-5e84e970c91a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f5c1473a-ef5e-4c48-a271-124388ec9df2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\dca63db3-0532-47a6-8af3-c5ab860ebad0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> acts on each element <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fba38b86-2d08-4008-939f-8c7efcb44401.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as an operator of multiplication by a function</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\1da8b105-8ddb-4caa-866d-2b08b2287342.png" /></p><p>And operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\fd619198-fb1c-4616-8228-0996ad324b26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> acts on each element <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\ec359b6b-f3e3-463b-b2cc-22398f411899.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as an operator of multiplication by a function</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\01a3a179-45d4-4345-9378-a42ca0a2bcce.png" /></p><p>Theorem 6. Let performed assumption <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8503196d-dde3-4dd2-91a5-a5c3a818783f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> about functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5fd7b1cb-fb90-4086-94d0-5cc7b27ef9d5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a6e0e7c2-dc61-4729-b149-2c098747d65f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\548a9c4c-a698-4174-a801-d25a265f823b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\35ba64ab-e033-4780-8eaf-09f446e27304.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3a3c781b-4010-4e3c-995d-cab560f1e028.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\170063df-5461-4155-a60d-648d91ab14af.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\877bf1bd-c133-4964-8aab-6fddea261b9f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-linear operator in space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\eb38a497-b0ba-46fc-a944-d6eb16fd9f31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with a dense domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5067b9e0-8cc8-4de1-ad57-31f7b557a9c2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the values of which belongs in linear manifold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d6ecf6f5-cd0f-44c7-a579-25cd9722e0a0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d81a44df-43ce-49bb-8a1e-c7f6828f1838.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-linear manifold of functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\10b4adbb-aa6b-456a-b52f-e0a03d795ae0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boundary values are related to the boundary values of the derivatives in the direction of the outward normal by relation</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\40e1a58c-37a5-41d1-9fba-d40a1a9b1f00.png" /></p><p>Then the self-adjoint operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\aa895c71-b4e0-4f35-9225-919da70abd79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient to satisfy the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\718f974a-29ec-449d-abb9-705016ba1294.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1a29475b-0e47-4e7f-9040-11ea55c3b85f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\8d31def9-f6e6-4681-8739-34e5c5cd7d72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\84ca6ee4-b54d-4e96-a2a4-bb7919b8756d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then from conditions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\5d7b346f-9bf5-40b9-a550-c2b32496dacb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1e0d03f3-8330-47b6-9ddc-1bc5b6762834.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\f65bb946-ad80-4513-beef-131c87767961.png" /></p><p>Hence</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\21e6f3cc-9d3b-43f5-9213-6cd22d420c88.png" /></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9d4888a7-9da7-4c68-943b-8e8ea2693f96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values, therefore the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9758283c-0b0c-4f07-bfef-c7b56b0518fc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\31ed96c8-8531-48b2-87e9-7f60b9601f89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Since the domain of definition operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f6dbe239-91bd-4de8-90b8-38302b553884.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is determined by the equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\506d46c5-a208-4d29-bcdf-e591bd437f3d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a80d4b5d-4667-4cb3-abea-5934e036d032.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then implies that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\43b4d1ec-f97c-43bb-b70f-559963aaaa8b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Corollary 4. Let performed assumption <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9c16de33-4a15-4e54-b699-0d89b5105f16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> about functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d4291418-020c-464a-8b8a-8830287c0efc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\40a322c4-49db-46b5-87b1-8ab5845e8e40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\97ba7809-fcb8-4406-a197-50b871ed8bc0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\cf1dc01e-f293-4676-a775-1ec6af74361e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-linear operator in space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\9e232c56-2588-4d65-a43e-364fcf3a120f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with a dense domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\82bc5944-a444-4a6a-a020-29349055926c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the values of which belongs in linear manifold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\1402e00c-ba9f-4a18-8d01-66f333e01b7b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d11ad6c5-c429-43b4-bc2f-09aea4a1249b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-linear manifold of functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\4119b922-d2d8-417c-946f-8d8ccd1ddcd0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boundary values are related to the boundary values of the derivatives in the direction of the outward normal by relation</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\e6086ec9-b789-431f-9dbe-306ebab1ddad.png" /></p><p>Then the self-adjoint operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\3a5db6fd-ce37-47e5-ad9e-8634b4f27f4f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient to satisfy the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\a0d4353a-f4c9-4faa-af54-88c024077852.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. Since performed assumption <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\458411c0-60e2-4386-944c-c3ce045a7611.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then from conditions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\b2abfde2-f7f6-411c-a79f-45f0a94d1110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\d16199fd-71d7-49fd-aa33-184f1e12709c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then we have the equality</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\0be0beeb-076f-4646-86f0-dda912e26fc1.png" /></p><p>Hence</p><p><img src="htmlimages\1-1720076x\d89c6adf-6c9a-47d7-9d15-86be9206a9db.png" /></p><p>Traces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\df05f7cd-4ea5-4f9c-9464-adedd1f0dd94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take arbitrary values, therefore the equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\09e885a2-1e1b-4bb7-ba39-5c8099fe531e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is necessary and sufficient for inclusion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\246d0454-69ec-4a87-99f4-22b65553e307.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Since the domain of definition operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\096975e6-96b8-4aa3-a461-4c9a2d86da57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is determined by the equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\f8907d80-779a-4954-b43d-3b03e93b6353.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\112fb858-9ed7-4db1-89f2-ff096a500fe1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then implies that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\1-1720076x\30419ab5-9512-4cc3-82fd-54fef79a0e5c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper we describe the set of all Schr&#246;dinger operators on graph and branched manifold, defined as a self-adjoint extension of the operator, originally defined on smooth functions with supports, not contained in the branch points manifold. Thus, given a description of the various options, we determine the Laplace operator on the space of the functions defined on a branched manifold. Description of the definition of each of the self-adjoint extensions is given in terms of linear relations satisfied by the limit at the branch points and the boundary points of the graph function value in the domain of operator and the its derivative. Each of the Laplace operators corresponds to the Markov process, whose behavior in a neighborhood of branch points, we determined by the choice of the domain of the Laplace operator, obtained in this paper results, which is an extension of the study work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref8">8</xref>] describes the self-adjoint extensions of a graph with a single vertex and two edges, to the case of a graph with an arbitrary number of edges. In addition, this paper summarizes the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.42094-ref6">6</xref>] in the case of Laplace operators, for which the linear relation in the space of boundary values that define the domain of the operator, do not admit the possibility of expressing the limit function values at the boundary points and branch points of the graph of the limiting values of its derivative.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.42094-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. V. Pokorny, O. M. Penkin, V. L. Pryadier, A. V. Borovskikh, K. P. Lazarev and S. A. Shabrov, “Differential Equations on Geometric Graphs,” M. FIZMATLIT, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. L. Chernyshev and A. I. Shafarevich, “Semiclassical Spectrum of the Schrodinger Operator on a Geometric Graph,” Mathematical Notes, Vol. 82, No. 3-4, 2007, pp. 542-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0001434607090313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. M. Penkin and Y. V. Pokornyi, “On Some Qualitative Properties of Equations for the One-Dimensional CW-complex,” Mathematical Notes, Vol.59, No. 5, 1996, pp. 562-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02308827</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Tolchennikov, V. L. Chernyshev and A. I. Shafarevich, “Asymptotic Properties and Classical Dynamical Systems in Quantum Problems on Singular Spaces,” Nelineinaya Dinamika, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2010, pp. 623-638.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. G. Amosov and V. Z. Sakbaev, “On Self-Adjoint Extensions of Schrodinger Operators Degenerating on a Pair of Half-Lines and the Corresponding Markovian Cocycles,” Mathematical Notes, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2004, pp. 315-322.http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:MATN.0000043458.91218.7b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Z. Sakbaev and O. G. Smolyanov, “Dynamics of a Quantum Particle with Discontinuous Position-Dependent Mass,” Doklady Mathematics, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2010, pp. 630-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1064562410040332</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Z. Sakbaev and O. G. Smolyanov, “Diffusion and Quantum Dynamics on Graphs,” Doklady Mathematics, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2013, pp. 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1064562413040108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Gadella, S. Kuru and J. Negro, “Self-Adjoint Hamiltonians with a Mass Jump: General Matching Conditions,” Physics Letters A, 2007, Vol. 362, No. 4, pp. 265-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.10.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Reed and B. Simon, “Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics ‘1. Functional Analysis’,” Academic Press, New York London, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Kato, “Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz, “Linear Operators ‘Part I: General Theory’,” Interscience Publishers, New York, London, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.42094-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Jakovlev, “Traces of Functions in the Space   on Piecewise Smooth Surfaces,” Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1967, pp. 481-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/SM1967v003n04ABEH002758</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>