<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2014.51010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-41672</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Multiple Solutions for a Class of Semilinear Elliptic Equations with Nonlinear Boundary Conditions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>iyan</surname><given-names>Yao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ziyanyao160@163.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>90</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this paper, using Local Linking Theorem, we obtain the existence of multiple solutions for a class of semilinear elliptic equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, in which the nonlinearites are compared with higher Neumann eigenvalue and the first Steklov eigenvalue. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Multiple Solutions; Nonlinear Boundary Conditions; Local Linking Theorem</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In this paper, we investigate the multiple solutions for semilinear elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19341"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\81348ee2-353b-4272-b732-095c9fe5d7ce.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\35347e4a-303a-4bd7-ad23-8ef0e645212e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded domain with smooth boundary <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f607b05a-5669-4c54-9bfd-7e497adb52e4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\90967e8c-c8bd-479a-a57c-abdb158c4d11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the outward normal derivative on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\44c5dfbb-5c25-4268-85e3-7ab15a82bf66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\511aab1c-b52e-41a2-90e7-d60107375fc0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies C) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\412105ad-cf8c-4098-91da-fb9ad46237ee.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Problems of the above type have been discussed extensively. In 1902, Steklov (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref1">1</xref>]) studied the eigenvalue problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19342"><label>(1.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\50812c87-ef02-4f7b-ba0b-3670a382b47a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Auchmuty (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref2">2</xref>]) considered the eigenvalue problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19343"><label>(1.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\00fe0600-e05e-47b0-ba32-c9fad483206b.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\012f20c1-4ff2-4e9f-aab2-f47b014c3645.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition C) and proved that the eigenfunctions provide a complete orthonormal bases of certain closed subspace of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6a7be900-52d3-422e-9055-57ce65886ce1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Using sub and super-solutions method, Amann (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref3">3</xref>]), Mawhin and Schmitt (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref4">4</xref>]) obtained some existence results for the problem (1.1). However, since it is based on comparison techniques, the sub and super-method does not apply when the nonlinearities are compared with higher eigenvalues.</p><p>In this paper, using the Local Linking Theorem, we obtain multiple solutions for the problem (1.1), which the nonlinearites are compared with higher Neumann eigenvalue and the first Steklov eigenvalue.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries and Main Results</title><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\a8993d20-3c54-4050-843f-737dfcfb4e1d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the Lebesgue space with the norm<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8654ca24-231c-41a4-afc9-8f5c94ba55fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\73dfceae-818b-495a-beb4-2b49a048730e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the norm</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8576247a-b0c7-48be-b375-e331cbeeb4c4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Obviously, the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\67155a62-5bac-4aad-8d13-f35dfe3418b0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\5ce6c60e-f523-4c89-a304-267b9962c944.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> inner product are denoted by</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8708ea27-383f-41c4-a5d4-115e7cd4bde5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\a4ec8c4f-123c-4b78-a475-949dd44348bc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a Hilbert space under the standard inner product</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19344"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\a7735ef5-6648-4493-9a52-cb6046319dcd.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the associated norm<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8a1eb529-0e5e-430c-88d7-678856dc0baa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\34f9b15f-75c8-4a2a-b095-7520e95b5cf6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition C), we define the weighted <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\542a0f21-8c13-4674-9c9e-c665a95f2254.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>inner product by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19345"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\486fc48f-ab0d-4dc2-9ac6-7361e5bd57cd.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the associated norm<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e670fb36-bb44-4f0f-bee8-55de0684cbc6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By Corollary 3.3 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref2">2</xref>], we obtain that the norm <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e285af3a-a0b4-4852-aa04-8d08176f1ee9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is equivalent to the standard norm<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\cc020863-f58f-42e2-90f7-6100cd9b2948.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\47a23c4e-fd93-4608-847b-b0915f5ac7eb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>satisfies the condition C), by Equation (2.2), we can split</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\03802475-5c40-4f0d-9c4e-232788f4d55f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>as a direct orthogonal sum.</p><p>Now, we state the Local Linking theorem introduced by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Lemma 2.1 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\9bf7ad14-0de2-403f-9cd4-1b816d715113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a reflexive Banach space, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e4f61db2-40a6-4af3-b5c5-8bef58c971c9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\44788757-7762-45da-bfeb-7c04b98c125e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the (PS) condition, if 1) there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\b7421aa5-26ab-4735-9bf9-5bf46ab42484.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>such that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\65f807d4-f11c-4126-95d6-6d8da65d9c9e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e4b6e817-9de9-463e-be77-0503b122e3c2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\66908295-75f2-42c8-a179-402d2c30d19c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is bounded below and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\10e045bb-901c-4c1b-9a97-0c2e96d28a19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\ba20e525-28ac-4b7f-b49a-c21ba4609356.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has at least two nontrivial critical points.</p><p>Proof. See Theorem 4 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>For the problem (1.3), Auchmuty (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref2">2</xref>]) obtained that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\71f8a8a9-567f-430f-9cec-01a6106a0d64.png" /></p><p>holds for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\0a341c0b-8e14-460c-a748-1e98476817c7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\ec31935c-b1b2-4d71-a42a-2743ea5e7e83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the first Steklov eigenvalue for the problem (1.3). In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref6">6</xref>], for the Neuman eigenvalue problem</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\474e86a6-0423-4ad3-bdf1-0c534e5039db.png" /></p><p>they obtain that the above problem has a sequence of real eigenvalues</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19346"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\3c14ae0a-e98a-4623-aff8-5746a38ced5a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with finite dimensional eigenspaces.</p><p>Assume that, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\ea92aa13-aa8f-4e7d-88bd-4c0882469a92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6eeaaaf0-727b-4919-980c-0b45856176f7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are Carathedory functions satisfying H1) There exist <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\b0448c03-755e-44e9-bdb9-2cce4a26c35c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\66b5b36a-5384-4425-ae06-35f6cc12f44b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\1cc969ca-6b53-4b52-93f1-730fefa5d1bb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\b54ff3d4-b602-43b6-a4d3-8bd5bec6eae9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and for a.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8975c07d-d96f-4885-8c41-716045a03f2c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>H2) There exist <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\efd1b2bc-6ba7-449f-a3af-0965b459688c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\0e5db17e-7dcb-4271-b463-7349f144e256.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\9c09b818-ee17-462a-b044-13badf442744.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4223389c-4300-4810-a8b8-fff76dafe56f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and for a.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\bb188617-6761-4a70-bfae-f959fc577f15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>H3) There exist <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4c2facfd-363d-4168-b61a-85b95a934596.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\a16338f2-d145-4c74-8315-6d25fa7d4c6b.png" /></p><p>and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\701bce3d-32c3-4cd2-9c69-6f8564e7338a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>uniformly for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\b4159b22-0dd6-4dd9-805d-25981f4b5682.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\c29d0adb-f8e7-4b1e-a95a-5ce18b1dcade.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>H4) There exist a integer <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\633a1743-257b-4639-bc1c-1a98492f80cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and four constants <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\0acdb25d-8bac-46ad-9854-42c75e1eb166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\ea194ab8-668e-4e9d-8cb8-e777fe618639.png" /></p><p>uniformly for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f9ab4555-0dc8-4b93-b1ac-a293aadc7e48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4e28aa45-fb86-4d56-b6b4-13f7dc7dd0cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4f49833f-0b00-44e1-86ad-b4a66a07d16f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8ad0af9d-70c2-48fd-b671-c23580c9bb25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\74259585-b2de-454c-9e48-caccdf119888.png" /></p><p>Theorem 2.2 Suppose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\35941e16-1f13-4643-b280-978abb9b280c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies C), and H1)-H4) hold, Then the problem (1.1) has at least two distinct nontrivial solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Proofs of Theorem 2.2</title><p>Now, we define the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\08979a0b-75a0-4a5b-9f9f-1eaf5203c927.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19347"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\5c1a5f77-582e-4ae4-ba7f-887d645048fe.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\284f9e34-7d24-4145-9f72-c019309c7208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Since the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\112763de-1b2f-4295-b7de-a0556e9a3aa4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies H1), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6d02205a-3488-484d-a7bb-8a6f81fcbd42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>satisfies H2), by the Sobolev embedding of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e6cf47d7-64e7-4b8e-9529-eb4a25dce5e9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>into<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f17fedc4-3706-408d-b53b-f4af84a907b1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the continuity of the trace operator from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\de83564c-c21b-43cf-894f-bd22cefc5631.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6c8e1a62-e122-4904-b215-8bbb88bb39cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the Holder inequalitywe obtain that the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\5b7cdb16-431a-4cc1-9a21-5a0c95b25b24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is well defined. Moreover, by Lemma 2.1, and Lemma 4.2 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref7">7</xref>], we obtain that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\aa2557e5-aefd-442f-bef9-d69b8fc2d337.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19348"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\78348e65-56fe-4cdb-bcc7-7dc448fdba65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Furthermore, the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\45ee105d-6748-4a3d-92cc-477dfe163743.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is weakly continuous, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\da069f1f-f120-44be-935b-ea1c972d1918.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is compact. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\a9b5ee83-9dbb-4332-baaf-b7b5f1f35939.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (3.2) and a simple computation, we obtain that the critical point of the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f5c1c10b-fc28-4ef1-ab4a-38372db10c1a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the weak solution of the problem (1.1).</p><p>Lemma 3.1 (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref7">7</xref>]) Assume that the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f71d34b8-611a-466e-877c-efb920f360e8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition C), H1) and H2) hold. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\7d8878e8-f52b-4103-a2ba-4e3537bdbfd7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a (PS) sequence for the functional<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\81058646-94cc-43e0-982f-05d42d5379fc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\a2cdf550-9ea1-48b1-aa40-546313d85c3d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\cda736bf-432f-415c-bfb4-4b4303bf3380.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\260f19c8-7ca0-4d29-b68e-9f233281088b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has a strongly convergence subsequence. i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\afe90600-c42b-4c6e-9d5f-e107b04a056a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>satisfies the (PS) condition.</p><p>Lemma 3.2 Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\bfbe24ae-4ee7-448b-abb4-1f6d8e356ff5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition C), and H1)-H3) hold, the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\27c647eb-05a9-4b87-ad27-5daefec40e8c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is coercive on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\c6818495-1024-4f4a-9c9e-705590f513d7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof By H3), we obtain that there exist some constants <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\29eb1329-6710-4296-a62f-39f08de1a658.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6aabe568-6f73-4f4e-bc39-450b7113759d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\d26faea1-1be6-4419-9da0-d0bcbfdf7f00.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\db9b4b7c-fdce-47cc-9af7-32a32e178d5b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19349"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\f5096746-e080-47eb-9c3a-2850574f52f2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From H1), H2) and Equation (3.3), we obtain that there exist <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f291df83-cc1e-404e-b092-8a3daebbb3cf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19350"><label>, (3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\dda30b5a-0504-4e75-9e1d-e36c4b162fa0.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence, we obtain that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19351"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\055a4cee-5960-4444-a13e-d124ee2b9b13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4f9de742-f0ab-4d97-87ad-414559ddf2ee.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then using the continuity of the trace operator from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\06c20109-6f7f-441a-9640-03eea3a42902.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\786e7878-f48f-4b44-9184-a5bc3d3e0e5a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we obtain either <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6cd11687-ad76-45c8-bacb-a3a9197f1cab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\fc721020-62da-4c6c-9526-6845723357a6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e0d63e19-2cc0-42bd-998a-d7a74772e6b0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive constant.</p><p>Case 1 As <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\ef47a0ed-200e-4942-a100-900ca796bc8e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by Equation (3.5), we obtain</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\aca66f72-1231-4d85-9169-03381e22a456.png" /></p><p>Hence, we obtain that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\ba2c912e-3cfc-4313-9dab-f67a698eedb3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is coercive on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\6c805576-a9aa-4937-9168-89fad91de3bd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\7461000b-39f2-4fa1-8782-5d8478683b9e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Case2 As <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\1f82014a-d4e5-488d-94e8-b4f9efee09c7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\87a9c4a9-af14-4ff4-977c-278dd4fe2fa2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>By H3), we obtain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\c60828db-578a-4fe7-bab7-ea9cabcdafd8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4d54797e-7de0-4bc6-8a97-2340cf12668e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is coercive on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\d55e92ed-19cf-45c0-a1bf-0f60333d630b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Hence we obtain that the functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\2aefe9e8-359b-49b2-96a1-b544dfd210ff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded from below, and every (PS) sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\c2eb921f-8b6a-4ab6-b6a9-f6676f74ebf6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\5a539b91-6376-4772-9b99-26bd6302c8c9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. From Lemma 3.1, we obtain that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\11dd4507-4b50-42f4-9e04-8eaa2d28f43d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies (PS) condition and is bounded from below.</p><p>The Proof of Theorem 2.2 We write<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\ff8c916d-ac52-4628-83a3-ae3294e4929c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\71d5149c-3ef3-473e-b9e6-817484090537.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\83717404-b75e-40c8-bc89-0948df449dba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Hence, we have</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\c58a2ac5-d6ee-417e-b03e-936d79fbf9c2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\5e62aee7-ee7f-41ca-9761-51b8916b3217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a finite dimensional space, by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41672-ref2">2</xref>], we obtain that for given <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e8a5c0db-d5ca-4529-b817-0dfb7358f1ce.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> there is a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\0464fc39-06da-4e37-baaa-bd6d88fa3a38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\36dcd460-605a-436e-8f0f-631807b0b4b3.png" /></p><p>Hence, for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\b1805e89-dcaa-49e1-b06c-d64463be1e15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, by H4), we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\193618ba-8d48-48fe-a045-bd82e01e8c1c.png" /></p><p>We have for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\80cf3154-8af6-4215-9f2a-c73baa0083d7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> sufficiently small,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\be60e553-21aa-4c93-8ed0-8196eb0941e3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Therefore, we obtain that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\68a8d0a5-a9da-472a-8ae8-0b76e9b07f76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>On the other hand, let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\4269e09b-3fc3-460c-8338-70ad5f66eec1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\fd551dff-a781-4dae-b1ae-ffe59211b688.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then for every <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f0f0aef4-fad6-4ebb-a050-f81512a398de.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\f98c9b4d-fc97-42b9-a925-be3c701b26a4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, by H4), we obtain that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41672-formula19352"><label>. (3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\10-7401938x\280861db-0e6e-406f-b7fb-ed28def1e9d6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combining Equation (3.4), Equation (3.6), H1) and H2), we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\93f52dc9-7c2d-435d-a6f3-91a33c009c7b.png" /></p><p>From Equation (2.6), we have, for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\2f91009f-9c7d-463e-8bd8-75f997141c06.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> sufficiently small</p><p><img src="htmlimages\10-7401938x\1e3e054c-14db-4682-9030-5accb0ad9e6a.png" /></p><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\8d9fef75-4c16-45bd-9126-b636182a630c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can choose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\c44aaba7-bc44-43d6-85d6-7436789e2e82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> sufficiently small and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\543488a5-fcb7-4588-836b-144e9f5b29e5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\e830fc3d-e3c6-47f1-a299-a24a1f6d2266.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> , such that the functional<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\70db389f-7b85-400a-b016-89f05d96a3c5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>By Lemma 3.2, we obtain that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\02cab56e-8a76-4359-b460-d36365f6b98b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies (PS) condition and is bounded from below. If</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\17da977d-155b-4f73-a30c-7b24ec9b80fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then by Lemma 2.1, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\7278c750-ed62-4e72-9fd9-ec6de2c32145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>possesses two nonzero critical point. From (3.3), we obtain that there exist two nontrivial weak solutions for the problem (1.1).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Using Local Linking Theorem, we obtain the existence of two nontrival weak solutions for the problem (1.1) which the nonlinearites <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\fad7d73b-b3bc-4ec4-b408-723526ea66cb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\10-7401938x\0501d327-93fd-43fd-ab0e-0d28274c35b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are compared with higher Neumann eigenvalue and the first Steklov eigenvalue.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This paper was supported by Shanghai Natural Science Foundation Project (No. 11ZR1424500) and Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (No. XTKX2012).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.41672-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. W. Steklov, “Sur les Problemes Fondamentaux de la Physique Mathematique,” Annales Scientifiques de l’école Normale Supérieure, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1902, pp. 455-490.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41672-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Auchmuty, “Steklov Eigenproblems and Representation of Solutions of Elliptic Boundary Value Problems,” Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, Vol. 25, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 321-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/NFA-120039655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41672-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Amann, “Nonlinear Elliptic Equations with Nonlinear Boundary Conditions,” Proceedings of the 2nd Scheveningen Conference on Differential Equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Vol. 21, 1976, pp. 43-63.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)71154-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41672-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Mawhin and K. Schmitt, “Upper and Lower Solutions and Semilinear Second Order Elliptic Equations with Nonlinear Boundary Conditions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A, Vol. 97, 1984, pp. 199-207.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S030821050003198X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41672-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Brezis and L. Nirenberg, “Remarks on Finding Critical Points,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 44, No. 8-9, 1991, pp. 939-963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160440808</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41672-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. V. Pao, “Nonlinear Parabolic and Elliptic Equations,” Plenum Press, New York, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41672-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Mavinga and M. N. Nkashama, “Steklov-Neumann Eigenproblems and Nonlinear Elliptic Equations with Nonlinear Boundary Conditions,” Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 248, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1212-1229.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2009.10.005</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>