<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2014.51004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-41609</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Common Fixed Point Theorems for Totally Quasi-G-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Semigroups with the Generalized f-Projection
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hunjie</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuanheng</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>chunjwang@sina.cn(HW)</email>;<email>wangyuanhengmath@163.com(YW)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this paper, we introduce some new classes of the totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and the totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroups. Then, with the generalized f-projection operator, we prove some strong convergence theorems of a new modified Halpern type hybrid iterative algorithm for the totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroups in Banach space. The results presented in this paper extend and improve some corresponding ones by many others. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Totally Quasi-G-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Semigroup; Generalized f-Projection Operator; Modified Halpern Type Hybrid Iterative Algorithm; Strong Convergence Theorem</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In this paper, we denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c15e4260-58bb-4202-929a-2e5c8aaabf0c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a10c5672-f3ad-4d10-b0cf-1b6f3302af74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the set of real number and the set of nature number respectively. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b6577d24-8f63-41f9-aeac-0ff114a723d9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real Banach space with its dual <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\63db2b18-5bce-43f0-b7cc-8bbf9d22cd60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\80f35b48-b1cc-4286-91cc-502340bbf1b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\918654a0-bdbe-4e0a-8beb-51771373b51b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8520c49b-d1b1-4ebd-a104-8857b48f6220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the normalized duality mapping, defined by</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\50d1f201-46f3-401d-9ae7-ec75b692dd02.png" /></p><p>Recall that a mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0d7d07e8-c54a-417b-b0f8-0ff25c7f8c6f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\27108f0e-26c4-4263-bc16-64775996b3c4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [1,2], if for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\86c8194d-b3c3-442f-a168-0e636c2c86ea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\b97e5895-bfae-4820-9327-99a315d317af.png" /></p><p>A mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\09a9c002-3bcf-4be3-bec8-341f04c7e965.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f9c72edd-3415-48a2-b199-a2b4a53d9e02.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c7eccefa-74a4-40c3-abe3-9285c95f64cd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, if there exists nonnegative real sequences <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7a7ee255-9472-47f6-a87c-4302c5935c22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\de37113b-38c8-4be6-95b4-cda99df1cf38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\08c77e0d-277e-4356-a239-e3595d10636b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\404bfbcf-3d70-4386-b09d-613a74f48c1a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a strictly increasing continuous function</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3472d244-d57f-4d10-aed5-973636ce8697.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bf60d6e6-6d08-49e3-b5e1-9150a5da8ed6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cba50b8e-90bc-4204-9136-fb2e8ae43d71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\bcd89ef2-41c5-49d3-a3c6-7e2aad8b9ff7.png" /></p><p>We use <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3b4aefa2-fc38-490c-b059-272d0946dda6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to denote the Lyapunov function defined by</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\25b5650b-283c-4318-a293-3a76698af4ad.png" /></p><p>Obviously, we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\934fc7fc-b930-40eb-a956-22be34be4425.png" /></p><p>Recently, Chang et al. [3-5] and Li [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref6">6</xref>] introduced the uniformly totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\300f4e5e-a5b5-4440-b5ef-e9077dfe9d1b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and studied the strong convergence of some iterative methods for the mappings in Banach space.</p><p>Definition 1.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref1">1</xref>] A countable family of mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b697cf23-2870-469b-8700-0a87ce26c5a3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be uniformly totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\01058e1e-d17b-484b-b671-757f785e8d72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive, if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8a01a119-73a8-46fe-8217-61080281d632.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and there exist nonnegative sequences<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7388f21e-e320-4cf1-9d5e-d683e83ce996.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c05f982d-8c5a-4026-8ffb-5fe7cd878bd6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b128cf70-1c59-4648-907c-a193afe41282.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>(as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\fb8ea904-32e1-4142-a092-1499f11fdc45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and a strictly increasing continuous function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b51281d3-2965-477e-8ac9-dcef4d5bb5db.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\109e7951-492d-4db8-94bf-d6d366161364.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that for each</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0bcd1a4b-e9d8-4259-82ef-84203cc45fa1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5175cae0-782a-4b37-9899-992f7b3a0041.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98936"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\a52e3ef0-b59a-4707-b49b-45ba60e5b75f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>More recently, Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref7">7</xref>] studied the strong convergence for a countable family of total quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\21351fb8-e3b6-4cb6-a10d-b5ae3e5394b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>- asymptotically nonexpansive mappings by using the hybrid algorithm in 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach spaces. Quan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref8">8</xref>] introduced total quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a9f68875-e958-4ac2-997f-b540cd5c47b7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup containing many kinds of generalized nonexpansive mappings as its special cases and used the modified Halpern-Mann iteration algorithm to prove strong convergence theorems in Banach spaces.</p><p>We use <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f15b0949-b122-4841-b395-f31c2031ea67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to denote the common fixed point set of the semigroup<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b9169503-abbb-47ed-b16a-c9ce162ad751.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d445ec94-82c0-49b3-a6ef-9485c6c4a65c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Definition 1.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref8">8</xref>] One-parameter family <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\128dbd80-aae5-4c2a-8b81-93e88a4ccf3f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be a quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d4480234-849d-42a2-9903-e34bf4e38032.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a0ebcd10-2280-409d-86b5-06b92866f071.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the following conditions are satisfied:</p><p>(a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5a749860-7cde-4d3c-bddb-afc8f3cae3fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bfd8f9e9-98a3-4598-909c-2265d80167b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>(b) For each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6dc8f535-e674-41df-af77-aae1d0fbfd64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\eef9b05a-7148-4c79-8e09-6a6b8410e3fe.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\01e25cd7-4ef5-4e2b-acb1-1e0c19b9fbc9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>(c) For each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a15c7a73-1e8a-48b9-a716-4b1913deb31e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ba59e058-fe1c-42f4-b034-946c751d6855.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous;</p><p>(d) For each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3e45f297-b7a2-4e3a-b320-6f3bca55293d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\41957802-6d73-4eae-800b-cdf8a38a044e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, there exists a sequences <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\01079844-071b-4332-ac3c-d895b7c1d05c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b1fe9249-349f-4286-93b7-1ed0b9f02b10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b7d69458-7033-4bca-bf7a-5b275a9ca09c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98937"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\57215005-34a7-487b-892a-661aabc97691.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>One-parameter family <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\78f2180d-8743-4afe-ba53-b95133ad318c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be a totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bda1e492-89e5-4716-bf6e-1dfb1b68d121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup, if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cf1e5faa-857c-49aa-85a4-6d9b45cd8bba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the conditions (a)-(c) and the following condition are satisfied:</p><p>(e) If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\15e13a94-a7d3-4ef2-837d-cafc43a8ddec.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, there exist sequences<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\552cb54c-3941-45c1-a33b-64f4e066692e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\87eaebe4-fe63-4177-8fa5-399858489607.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e07ff693-51e3-45cf-9a17-1e6df826db73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ac6ed658-5ee4-41c4-88e7-817b8563234f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a strictly increasing continuous function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d056eb60-9078-4410-b90f-687773da4aa0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d8e22b68-23af-40a6-93f8-ab7d536e84c1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98938"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\277bdc5f-3b56-4d60-be05-f1af65cdc81f.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\36e3bf13-29d6-4850-8cb8-a05c82b34ef1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\04cb898d-296d-433f-a11e-3d95a0912635.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>On the other hand, Wu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref9">9</xref>] introduced the generalized f-projection which extends the generalized projection and always exists in a real reflexive Banach space. Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref10">10</xref>] proved some properties of the generalized f-projection operator and studied the strong convergence theorems for the relatively nonexpansive mappings.</p><p>In 2013, by using the generalized f-projection operator, Seawan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref11">11</xref>] introduced the modified Mann type hybrid projection algorithm for a countable family of totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\66d43162-c63d-4325-92d5-c99e63e75417.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space with Kadec-Klee property.</p><p>Motivated by the above researches, in this paper, we introduce a new class of the totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings which contains the class of the totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\804b3bc0-d0c5-4626-9c09-3826cd402e70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and we extend from a countable family of mappings to the totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup. Then we modify the Halpern type hybrid projection algorithm by using the generalized f-projection operator for uniformly total quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup and prove some strong convergence theorems under some suitable conditions. The results presented in this paper extend and improve some corresponding ones by many others, such as [1,2,7,8,10,11].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries</title><p>This section contains some definitions and lemmas which will be used in the proofs of our main results in the next section.</p><p>Throughout this paper, we assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5ec14edf-9da7-4b92-8a34-93cb9eabbf96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real Banach space with its dual space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2ab637b3-2922-4425-bbfd-1718d39add7e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A Banach space</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6d54cc4b-df9d-4e27-a9f8-a7f80249fe65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is said to be strictly convex, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\32120216-b459-42da-8587-286b2da05c47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c6de4e73-be08-4f6e-b111-be0e0c51e205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\21945bb0-7a66-470f-b8ec-e5e946ec761b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ad2a10ff-394e-46cf-b284-280afbfa52ba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\40404349-c340-4a6e-b21e-b8fb84f13b8f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is said to be uniformly convex, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\356eaf8b-fcd5-47a2-81ae-2471fd5202a1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any two sequences<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\83428b64-6266-4186-9482-2df8e9f730ba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9c7457eb-c3dd-4ef2-9f62-3d8a137c8ef8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\30b8c043-cfb3-4936-aa0b-d5e9834ed2fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9441efb4-94f6-43ad-b47a-cc64634ee85e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\48cafc7c-38be-4168-b654-7995b4f367b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A Banach space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\58f02a23-14cc-4c82-b96e-fd166e4847bb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be smooth, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\1975c714-2038-4a10-a05a-db378c732a55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> exists for each</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\18e04c8d-cdc4-4f34-a843-606f713b11f8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c62982ef-00b1-42f8-85e2-76302256f36e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a2b5149c-2d63-44b1-a108-2d5b3ef7f3e9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is said to be uniformly smooth, if the limit is attainted uniformly for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\64af7b15-aec2-433e-90f0-bb04fc1607ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It is well known that the normalized dual mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c868686d-5ffc-46ce-b91f-04327a54631c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> holds the properties:</p><p>(1) If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\97394f9c-029f-4e7a-ba79-3221abcc526e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a smooth Banach space, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\564ec882-4be5-44d6-a974-4bd9d3826218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is single-valued and semi-continuous;</p><p>(2) If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3603657b-3d39-4332-b076-3f83c454a674.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly smooth Banach space, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a7e74ff6-52b7-4dd7-8ab0-8410f40e26a5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous operator on each bounded subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8bfde9b1-f984-4cd4-82b1-bc47a1f72412.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>A Banach space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b9e7c8ad-ecc9-4c8a-8662-871f51d10036.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to have Kadec-Klee property, if for any sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\331c944c-094c-4908-9d41-b5c00e596c52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e37f1b81-5f49-4e6c-a97e-c418df9e6b85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\90f688eb-a6e3-461c-82c1-648a6fec000a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2105f8f6-2411-4e4c-b9c0-10ab3a63e27a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As we all know, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c10e286f-b410-4d10-8ff1-7f861b12a440.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly convex, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\65ea3325-b8a9-4299-a05c-a37e66d691ca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has the Kadec-Klee property.</p><p>Now, we give a functional<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c95d3be7-2cfe-494a-9ac4-82f1627aa370.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98939"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\ef466985-bbb5-4d1f-94e2-cf1bc6c6bbfc.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cb3558a8-c459-4110-9e6b-78e3d86ffe4c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0b6144b1-3079-4a83-9731-93e818075583.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5d04b8aa-47b1-4c22-8a74-ec2fefa6c37f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a positive real number and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a4fdb334-325d-4bd5-95f7-38bb3d5015c7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is proper, convex and lower semi-continuous. From the definition of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8654d9f6-fd5e-40f6-9dca-88d674e0c53f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4758a801-2e3c-404a-bdb8-cba810023883.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it is easy to see the following properties:</p><p>(1) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7bb4eeaa-efe7-4e4e-9110-35336282cfd3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is convex and continuous with respect to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c70655c3-5dec-4fb3-8084-620601ceaf07.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\708d415a-0b30-48c7-bddf-ab94ad7d08fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is fixed;</p><p>(2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\13d05109-db72-40ce-9650-5dd2d133b59e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is convex and lower semi-continuous with respect to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7e40c783-6cfd-4957-bddf-716f815c2069.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\00f37a7d-c4e5-459c-aa1c-bc1bdd180811.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is fixed.</p><p>Definition 2.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref9">9</xref>] <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e6fccec0-4ec8-4493-a698-16e477e9bbde.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is said to be a generalized f-projection operator, if for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cb8ab087-98ea-4e25-801f-a1f14645e9c8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98940"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\616907f1-5465-4e02-95f4-436eb88bb905.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref9">9</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b9da81b8-6e62-4442-af16-f56725da68c8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real reflexive Banach space with its dual<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bd27518d-0485-40b3-8631-ce2910ab0106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6c4aa231-250b-4bb9-a125-25a5201ff241.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>be a nonempty closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e0bec007-ab79-40a3-9ae0-1953ea0b78b0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f2accc3d-ce62-4ef7-a408-32caebcd7113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty closed and convex subset of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b75e67f2-2fde-46df-98c7-bc7703e9442d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\437774f8-6548-40e5-bfd8-a67793107fbc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreoverif <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\73767898-373d-49ed-9482-0a5ce5a90d5a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is strictly convex, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\44f2f513-906b-489a-8a37-2f0859aa7acc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a single-valued mapping.</p><p>Recall that if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e684d3f5-50e0-45c7-8344-03e585dbbb58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a smooth Banach space, then the normalized dual mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\23e1dd3b-c8c0-42db-9b42-d687854a5005.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is single-valued, i.e. there exists unique <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9748dd01-1727-4cee-8bc8-d4f6677abce8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f19c9ae0-e084-4fc8-b5c3-0d0f48fb15c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\995bbd32-c6fa-41d9-b665-012400786018.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then (4) is equivalent to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98941"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\92917fc2-d7db-402c-b793-727d03fd1fc2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And in a smooth Banach space, the definition of the generalized f-projection operator transforms into:</p><p>Definition 2.3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref10">10</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\48e0ce37-1dcb-42bd-ae30-43e8a7d7be4e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real smooth Banach space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c2e2920f-1e3a-454b-8709-c451103cd77b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5e9694bc-f03c-4480-8d58-db2a8cee92d1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\236aa7ff-85ae-4222-9ec4-ec859adf8e8b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called generalized f-projection operator, if for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\065c6be4-4c1d-4d16-bb97-e295678d9d28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98942"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\4207ab58-3e2c-4436-b60e-296730c3cd24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we give the definition of the totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c6ceebe5-92d6-4048-bb3c-9516eae66ef3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping and the totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7c03c9ef-e5fb-4e56-87dd-c09b4ca0a319.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup.</p><p>Definition 2.4 A mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3bc1c063-27af-40d5-aae6-a64231294c83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be a quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\fab40bcf-6c40-4eea-a3a5-15e76f10f64d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and there exists a sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\dd54af36-25d7-484f-a9a1-b95c83d3bb6f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e40aa4a5-0f77-4de0-9a1c-b06532ab6d44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\98dee701-d1c8-4e35-9c65-4b5c2c0fdc2c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98943"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\b0f09f51-db04-42cd-971f-9a0f0029ae5a.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\1948eb85-4c3a-4f43-b4d6-067053dc3560.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a0a5bf26-4ba4-4c8e-9e7f-755e8a1b00aa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>A mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c2027faf-d645-4ecd-89f3-c9bd2ef6f440.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d1d5a1b6-39cf-4cbc-8faf-bd370ca490ca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and there exist sequences<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8d4bbe13-7b8c-46aa-ac8a-cf79ed93e230.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8e6bb4e5-fe5d-45dc-ac9c-55f909d7a707.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8caa627f-17c3-421b-a797-53fd57f63637.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bb0c78e7-a40e-4059-8382-a2d7da8616ab.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a strictly increasing continuous function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\800a8d8a-42c5-4d06-a744-e34af70eb5cb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9e2d617b-2350-476b-b1fa-a981611614f6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98944"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\70656f98-5473-4a30-b91f-487a02bcf844.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\19252f00-d515-453e-97ca-b1b1a2174c78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\872d5425-07b0-4ee4-a372-99c5ee7c551d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Remark 2.5 It is easy to see that a quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\da9e1e8e-60a5-410f-92cb-31203030194d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping is a quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\08bd58d9-0574-48ce-8578-d4809660afde.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3cedb6df-ef27-4f2f-aa88-ae5339eefb5b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a6db00ae-fb1d-4666-a73e-751219833991.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping is a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\889541e8-33b7-44c8-b87d-f8a4799fcac1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore, our totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings here are more widely than the totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a5a49dcc-6a2d-40ee-9008-c622652db322.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>- asymptotically nonexpansive mappings which contain many kinds of generalized nonexpansive mappings as their special cases.</p><p>Definition 2.6 One-parameter family <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f786538d-1587-4d80-a40f-667b18470018.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be a quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6bfaba08-f315-47e5-9236-340fd74cd875.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, if the conditions (a)-(c) in Definition 1.2 and the following condition are satisfied:</p><p>(f) There exists a sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\245188b5-3b22-44c5-97ca-2dbeb02511a0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ce8f5659-f575-4c5f-9f83-4d2426545eb7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f13f5859-3ca1-4295-ac01-084eb907fe09.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98945"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\4fcb21c7-5470-4288-814f-a1ccfad0a81e.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>holds for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b628854f-2cc5-4588-b974-ec698d512043.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\eb65b165-5473-4a06-b5b4-630b0c396017.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>One-parameter family <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cb34ea9b-a00a-42ce-b4d2-b38239578bfb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is said to be a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\20c84476-9680-415c-8bf7-2c18eec255ee.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, if the above conditions (a)-(c) in Definition 1.2 and the following condition are satisfied:</p><p>(g) if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6b42c864-0498-4bda-9c25-66f14b02dd3f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and there exist sequences<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f2013408-173e-496c-a8b9-c95b513bacbc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2bd0b5c4-4c4f-4482-9bae-cfe3ba5ab2cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\47818db6-4d30-4831-a924-3b0306ca47a6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\dbf020e9-d23d-440a-83f0-f74156be1b43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a strictly increasing continuous function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0ef43f40-ad0c-4915-9fe0-685f29d41671.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\de99bf86-9e6a-4d23-86b4-cf9b015c9bd9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\90b88ea7-6368-4559-8a6a-ba7a1ad8e0f7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\14bbdc99-454d-466c-8815-fbd67400910d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98946"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\55b7f8b9-746c-48c5-aa27-aad3d1c65e14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>holds for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\584cd1a6-9ce1-4800-a5c6-8ed4431212d3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Remark 2.7 It is easy to see that a quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\65460352-f77d-4539-a45d-8256faf2631e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup is a quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a7638af8-41de-4cda-8c09-7b1bc3e1a9fc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d46ff430-44af-408e-99cb-f93578585baa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0a1a5395-3f26-4a4c-954a-6d3c5aeee1d4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup is a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c3295e24-ab1f-4e48-a36f-9e23ea931eb6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>When we use <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5486ba0c-c4cc-449f-b698-1537807b0365.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> instead of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2b258f5b-5628-4732-a9dd-6337815ff9ca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Definition 2.6 and denote <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9f421123-3c65-4ede-92aa-12021fd07b5d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6c166fd1-1b26-4336-91b1-e416e411a9d4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a4ae5c8d-7733-4d0a-8ac0-dab4ec5d7082.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then a quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup becomes a countable family of total quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings which contains a countable family of total quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bfee4925-d504-42b9-a461-8e1f4304a2c3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings (see [3,4,7]) as it’s special case. So our totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup here is the most widely family of the nonexpansive mappings so far.</p><p>The following Lemmas are necessary for proving the main results in this paper.</p><p>Lemma 2.8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref12">12</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9217e17b-4868-4d17-87c7-aa000975fca8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly convex and smooth Banach space, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\416f4547-fd9b-4d43-bbec-3deb120d7700.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7c2f631f-9d97-4e08-8c71-0bc112b8c7e0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>be two sequences of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4ec73609-4fc3-4f8b-ab06-c9ac96454777.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c50e6a2e-0fb6-4678-a897-43e18de0ebff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and either <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2dc699be-e51e-4dbd-89bd-cab55547eec5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\fcb1eef6-e624-480a-85cc-53a84979b973.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded, then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\169fa6b7-a9b5-476c-b7bb-78540e30e790.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma 2.9 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref13">13</xref>] If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b86f1992-db4f-48cc-85a8-edc7864ace2c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a strictly convex, reflexive and smooth Banach space, then for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\74aec8a1-8a7a-4105-ae4f-22c7bf454fa9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c8f5ad65-dcc5-4f30-a11e-cb0a439e4a1d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>if and only if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\60e9df52-0933-475b-8829-51274073ab88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma 2.10 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref14">14</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\827ad3fa-2244-4171-8ec0-06a7a498cad6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real Banach space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2cdde02a-dacc-48be-b0d6-97f3f5d40ad4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a lower semicontinuous convex functional. Then there exists <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3ba48a6e-64c7-497b-95f4-00c4463be207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\78bf7c03-be0b-46ec-8db4-db474a18e16c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98947"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\81c901b7-3834-40a2-a5ca-a6e559673838.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\13fd16fc-8628-4728-ad38-aa3b71104864.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma 2.11 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref10">10</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8589a7d9-3763-4515-9f52-5a4d25ed0269.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real reflexive and smooth Banach space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5b9d5c00-177b-4118-8811-7d6f29f76a11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f9ff2dc4-c04e-4546-a757-424415906829.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\29614118-856d-469c-9ad1-38ba9d507829.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2ebd2950-a548-4dab-a7d9-1f03aaaf5956.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98948"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\810b90f2-a0d8-4e6a-bf3d-4750efe76af5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2.12 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9a61960e-6abf-42f2-9e3a-17dd53ec9b48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\94ed5529-4c61-485e-a49a-0390f094b221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>be a nonempty closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a09b3b80-c0a4-4216-bc16-a6ae9ece19ef.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9de76288-971d-4f7b-b3bc-b379a0fa2fb7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping defined by (9). If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\199dde73-3f01-467e-9e1b-4ef2a3696b5e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the fixed point set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6898781b-e7e3-4455-93ae-5da7db289ba5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d6448f63-24b7-4601-87c2-10fefbaf76c0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\00638c0b-f84d-40d5-899e-807ebe31b9ac.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\080165ee-36e1-453d-9202-b7b1bc2b34fd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a sequence in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4a56bcc3-eb02-422b-9cca-5de9aa909aff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8901bfa1-5ffc-467f-b38f-8d01977eccbc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\43cb9ed5-7d3d-4b47-8b0b-142f080f4459.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\92ade80b-4284-4809-9994-ea3e3e6cc88b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In fact, since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2ce973d9-e221-434b-b428-852ce9891247.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping, we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\3d4769b6-3a91-4a62-8e96-183c8d812388.png" /></p><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\096dd71b-7167-4cd8-a9ba-2e95ff362f7f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it is equivalent to that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\2b79cb21-7ebb-4f1f-a8d5-54c18e2aca68.png" /></p><p>So,</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\39ad9635-bd43-4600-8d8a-e9bb9246fed1.png" /></p><p>By lemma 2.8, we have that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\06bfeafe-6648-418a-a1d4-301d08de14a1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which implies that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a937a028-f480-4283-a844-a9ab4125830f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is closed. Next we prove that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a57ee256-4cf4-4079-b9d7-f7c71bfea64f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is convex, i.e. for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\18181ccb-ab1d-44cb-8b1e-258af9291f6d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\91008d93-0689-4904-beb4-b63783067afb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8b542895-3907-43bc-8a21-d663c17dd9b9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In fact,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98949"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\7a511115-cc8d-42b8-a812-0d1e720322d4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98950"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\851e2393-ddcd-4d69-bb82-8491a720a9f8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Submitting (15) into (14), we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\fd997dd6-ff9f-4414-a03e-1cda8575f770.png" /></p><p>This implies that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f6bca697-4b0a-49f0-abf8-f952485bfd8c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\768eb034-455f-429f-84e4-bf710f7fbfb4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Hence we have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8cfacb50-8342-45f9-9461-70cc0a6fa675.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0f19f235-ea11-4c2b-b002-40ab48291c3e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This completes the proof of Lemma 2.12.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Main Results</title><p>Theorem 3.1 Let E be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b75801c3-4a47-48ce-9d50-903b595d8213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\310e70c7-dba7-4713-8600-c8632e90305d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a convex and lower semicontinuous function with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4cfd2b57-9e66-4e44-b183-ab735b70abcb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bbda2632-8253-4eb6-9526-1faa093ae05f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2d4c4ae8-a6cf-4d62-aa44-24982169394d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\230db24e-bf30-4763-8345-aed2576dd9d4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9767cff9-81a9-445d-bfb0-922932e80290.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a closed and totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup defined by Definition 2.6. Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cfa17574-e690-4095-a6ba-05ac6174344f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly asymptotically regular for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ad1f9317-8ced-436e-ad19-8a249c5856b6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\480530fb-39e7-4d70-a782-4bc00dbbdab3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let the sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c07d8831-285a-4a7d-89f8-9055099dc727.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98951"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\7d097b7d-bbdb-4427-ab2f-847542fddb4e.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d01e029f-2dbc-4a9b-8fa5-ed892423aec6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the sequence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\66986d72-5a35-4a57-9c6c-559fc818bb97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a06f22dd-e110-4203-9b32-d819d2660543.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\461b9050-5336-4fff-8535-0c2a127d4923.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2f22ada0-a461-458e-b94f-a7974f25466a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7aad3e9b-2ca4-432d-b25b-c7e65b707637.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof We divide the proof into five steps.</p><p>Step 1. Firstly, we prove that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a4c564ef-3e6c-42cc-86f7-8dbda107423a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\01e1e2e6-c7f8-4e33-b2a4-5988d0a7637a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are closed and convex subsets in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\28d24f31-4030-4e2d-9155-9ff3649f09fc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9207b221-2e4a-4608-982a-c03981d5f20a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping, it follows the Lemma 2.12 that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4402d1f1-6fe2-4eca-9520-8bfc9bc95def.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6aaba6a9-952b-4734-a566-440a7049d849.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. So <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e1094fc1-01ec-4082-a2d1-164376ae78ec.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f17d8bdc-19be-4285-a2bf-a6967a7f0846.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Again, by the assumption, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7345cd9f-a6be-43ce-bc45-7fed84fea954.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is closed and convex. Suppose that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5920bd69-ca15-49e3-b3fb-245ad393020b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the closed and convex subset of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\befddb17-281f-4b1a-8b63-3a96d2668308.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e3a06cdb-5b84-476e-9195-4e304d654d1f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In view of the definition of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\717cf593-11fe-444f-abdb-719ba1a20ae0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\a7e988b7-e019-4cca-8afb-9a16ec826e25.png" /></p><p>This shows that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e92d70b7-3736-4f0a-b5c6-22b637f793a9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b4021e7a-172d-433d-bf3c-aec60ff4e79d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Step 2. Next, we prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4688ce6b-95d9-454c-b870-82a5a6a0a6ba.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In fact,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f9ff8793-f6d6-4fc9-a7e6-75292f3b9eae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Suppose that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\232f0747-5494-4f48-b815-d1e29015e426.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, for some<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5ec72b8e-277e-4b0b-b83a-cf8936056a04.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\419a13d7-81f0-4243-8dae-0e1a524a159d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup, for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f86ab89b-3207-4e88-bd65-ba7d7f25c01b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\c4b6f334-5abd-43fc-9968-54c130d78e7f.png" /></p><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0415b50e-4adb-437a-878c-a66eaae19b40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This shows that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c58ae68e-b82e-4ff1-babb-890ceb6a6762.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which implies that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e790d343-fc3d-4080-a002-cfa7893ef839.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a34e28c5-4627-4463-a41b-4ddad2359a29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Step 3. We prove that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ee083bb1-cfb1-403e-b1b3-ceb529d23407.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\744fb7f4-38aa-46df-b7ca-9ba171e041b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is convergent.</p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b2d6b1ef-9a83-45cf-8853-6baee573888b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a convex and lower semicontinuous function, by virtue of Lemma 2.10, we have that there exists <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3a5728b5-8301-4a61-bb53-fb1f5b3fd008.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\80db1f4b-13bf-48cf-b9f4-983c196cfee5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3d89b833-8623-4a77-8298-309df26c6847.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\89c71a7d-d7d6-4895-ba59-ba246f0d4f5f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\614ffd37-353b-4987-ac4a-5340517ddc40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98952"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\99839132-fba1-4825-9bf0-0cad8d3833c1.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Again since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e40c64ed-f06b-42e7-8ec5-5839d5c33dff.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\37945321-372b-43f7-9e3e-15333d28038e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, from Lemma 2.11, we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\40f0dfed-bb7c-4b69-8062-9ce8beca049e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d80cd022-b2d3-4def-a75b-286936ca5a8e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Hence, from (17), we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\7f171c40-e000-4da9-a7ce-44b311057855.png" /></p><p>Therefore <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f39b5928-0050-4a23-b050-4cb08c82af89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\01bad127-81da-4a48-8fa4-1b360b619f9d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are bounded. As <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e3804026-f011-4c3c-9367-9318540ecbd4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3bc75827-4279-425e-b6b4-148fc592e63b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, by using Lemma 2.11, we have that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\dcd64050-9afa-4704-b2e2-74ca065390ce.png" /></p><p>This implies that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9d8bb995-5551-4979-ad9a-3547301438c9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded and nondecreasing. Hence the limit <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d9c21432-ee2d-4b4a-b2aa-849e824ffc1b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> exists.</p><p>Step 4. Next, we prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f3c59f98-a505-4540-9dc7-24ede6b76207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>By the definition of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4dc1c8c5-bb31-4883-8e42-bd5964be9ff1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, for any positive integer<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e4f68770-4630-4210-b59a-4e5e063ffc99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\72e1c94c-334a-4ca8-a591-ea6aef6b1db0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Again from Lemma 2.11, we have that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\f6de5e5a-49e6-4f70-8362-bd3788fecb26.png" /></p><p>as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\feb81ed0-8cbf-4f60-b642-9f3213b4460a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It follows from Lemma 2.8 that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\19a7be9b-c6f6-43d3-a535-a609e3ddc854.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Hence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\98dff3b8-c5ef-4051-b939-4346a5816f2e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a Cauchy sequence in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\170ec9ae-9ada-458d-8526-fd72c0b72816.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\05be3f9d-6007-4b70-a5cf-d709aa6c708a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty closed and convex subset of Banach space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\187ad751-d994-4b86-957d-7dba955ef7e0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can assume that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3919491a-3f6e-4795-9e46-617f55e1c6de.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98953"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\a9b1c464-d870-43b3-bf96-dcf364a3b1d0.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f02a457a-844b-417c-a752-758cff8bb1fe.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\be6e09ea-0aad-416c-98c5-bb76cb981ed6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it follows from the definition of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\20b2305f-07e6-4ad3-9250-3f0a7d8f7509.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\64bb1bff-422f-4a77-876c-fb30c72fe14b.png" /></p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\57e01792-6a4d-45f0-a494-8b30a98ffe2a.png" /></p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\f8b11c5b-144b-49e1-9b2f-e8a9521c5d41.png" /></p><p>That is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98954"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\220121e8-bdb4-4f54-b86f-1d0662a9e8d7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bf128a2e-fd98-42b5-8eb4-c8471852b312.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\309a87d3-e798-4d8d-be63-d267c82ec5b1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, from (18), (19), we can get</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\6a12770a-cb6e-4d41-800e-b90c09a163a5.png" /></p><p>Then, by Lemma 2.8, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98955"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\e4f30a51-c76a-4d96-986e-1ebd42ec99ce.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\56f7110e-f306-45cc-8348-7c2882fc7cb5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly continuous on each bounded subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\33a1b5fe-2c48-4ab5-9880-98336a376d47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2107271b-68c3-459f-a886-7b8f3d578217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then from (20), for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a4c4a09e-ba79-43d4-b983-3efb98371932.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\11f3411f-8fa3-4c4d-96e6-ff984578cb76.png" /></p><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\b1b456d6-4ce6-4e11-b998-93c6c0383f7c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have that</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\fd47e4b3-f6a1-4586-83bb-95dd69a7f6e0.png" /></p><p>uniformly for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4cf7adbf-93e7-40b5-a1d2-ab28106b5e7e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since J is uniformly continuous, we obtain that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98956"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\824e83ed-8f6b-4145-aa32-dc1c7b6069ef.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>uniformly for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e4926ba9-50c9-48f7-aeb7-57d193d0c203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\36eac89b-b4be-4a49-89df-f4a65c949ea0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is asymptotically regular for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2043a1c1-176d-4fdc-97d7-861c6a8237ce.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, from (21), we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\c492b1d3-c64b-47db-b6ea-f933e6622aaa.png" /></p><p>Then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ef38bccf-bcb0-4a70-a835-f08c209d3a48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ce2ee018-4ea8-432f-a501-603810aae63d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By virtue of the closedness of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2ca0817f-ba8a-4103-8cf6-cb3c432136a3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9558ec03-a8d7-4ba9-ab55-78a6fa4d22d7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8a2639e0-b4ca-4dd7-875f-3f19be480f9d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can obtain that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3a0945e3-7a8c-47d8-b936-fda7b706a3ca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which implies <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d300eef3-754f-4b4b-991f-986a0424d6cf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d379cad8-ea89-4673-8def-d6633ab9e38a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Hence,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\cc52bcbc-92a4-4797-9903-13c623a6a0eb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Step 5. Finally, we prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0718f717-71f2-4ecb-8efe-bb50283300bb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a5a89fdd-5b9b-4ab8-8903-85c51c532311.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex, by Lemma 2.2, we know that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\86d597c2-5113-41b8-97b1-f2e92907c61c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is single-valued.</p><p>Assume that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0a14fe7b-b082-4924-bbec-dfcdd6101ac4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\be3e0238-ddd3-4a53-ae96-926cad4518ed.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a0e7a174-4d33-4c7e-ba50-844bc228f774.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ee8e7c11-de04-4170-818a-57b962fe82b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9fd86b2e-074b-40ed-ad93-0ef1b86e6d38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As we know, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5c6b4a9a-bafd-4da1-a6a7-9aa6c0e188c9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is convex and lower semicontinuous with respect to y when x is fixed. So we have</p><p><img src="htmlimages\4-7401735x\4094cdf3-b00d-4258-bd3a-412f64a8749d.png" /></p><p>As<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\feea90c0-f03e-4988-9b44-8135078339b2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, from the definition of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8c052e96-1479-489a-bbac-2cfbbe0b25f2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can obtain that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2586f614-9291-4b58-b77f-cf6e08a0d294.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\8b477abb-d28f-4863-970e-e95d293ffa60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\601487fa-dd5d-450b-8ab3-94d4374f8ce3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1.</p><p>Just as in Remark 2.7, we use <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\097443f1-d51d-44e9-93c0-298a44248bc3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> instead of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\80dac004-5aaa-47d8-83e4-387730d5471f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Definition 2.6 and denote <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\dbd095ec-01f8-437b-a6f5-9178f96eced7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2f9930b7-7b24-46ae-a2ca-c9870562e65a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\0db81605-cb3b-470e-b912-cc1241c7a991.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>becomes a countable family of total quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Then we get the following corollary.</p><p>Corollary 3.2 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ed3227e3-062c-49bf-aeca-a787ec046dd2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\03f221d7-6739-417a-867d-d38668571ba6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9bb44257-b071-49ca-86b2-d17e26a3abd1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9e2ede8a-e655-4213-8e2c-5507f0fcf0a0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a countable family of closed and totally quasi-Gasymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\311a784c-2519-4e6c-af42-959b68906ec5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a convex and lower semicontinuous function with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\915869a8-e913-4340-8dfb-a6e23258ce9b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e5d55304-a33a-464c-b931-9ce62e142000.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e92843d4-174a-4c66-bcd9-82397fa0d648.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\9b6edfda-bc85-4f53-8e9b-54dcd91c4974.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\bdfce35d-08c2-407c-abe2-bf3c56db11d2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly asymptotically regular for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\04d85550-7e9d-41aa-964d-a38c88edc8d7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\2144ce23-5e08-4dc2-8b7f-2200400d4a0c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let the sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\1ec48c48-0d3f-4d9b-af3a-2e855c9affc8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98957"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\cc0e4ff6-cc29-4ee0-a483-528f4d2a7ad6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\ca555e71-2a7f-4ef3-89c9-1960ea4f2db3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\15f98aa3-7754-47a9-a650-b23038e101ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3720e619-0664-4b1e-9998-b8d51abc695b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\4fb9b91e-59d4-410c-9b64-6963a7200bee.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d176104b-9065-40a6-8562-73da0f203fa0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>converges strongly to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\6a9d569b-c89c-44b6-9845-e38b5883512e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In Corollary 3.2, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7545d5eb-dbcb-4efb-9eb1-00ccd5c0a4e4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\eb8c3157-2621-40b2-b92f-7b9b4874f98e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\eed42d83-021c-4736-a84d-d905da3f9e76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>be a countable family of closed and totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\3e529967-f78e-4697-ab17-168c36dffbaf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Then we can get the following theorem.</p><p>Corollary 3.3 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c1f53a48-fabc-4b46-ae4e-24b82c4e851a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\d350d86d-e2fe-4762-8ea8-68803b0ba60c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed and convex subset of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\65f2d5d1-c433-4dc7-b027-78dc38f7bb6d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\e8b8557f-3329-4797-8339-0ff1d7f2ee3a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a countable family of closed and totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\63b9d789-4bcc-4c75-afdd-b42292e843b8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\882a65c4-e14c-4979-8336-388bafc4da45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly asymptotically regular for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\362a09f9-8c32-40ed-b2ca-88416633bfca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\c78587c5-bf97-4618-b54e-c4946699b169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let the sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\464e89b3-fb84-450f-9b82-ad500df60d11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41609-formula98958"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="htmlimages\4-7401735x\3d951526-240a-4fcc-aaac-6027460a966d.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\84dad410-fcf3-412d-89f6-63fbfb64d090.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\f9baed6f-2cae-41e5-aa3c-6778f595b498.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\5d1cbf21-a6fb-4b75-bc1a-ddc4c70cc6c1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\7d5683ab-53b8-4f0a-ad80-a8cfbc384adc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\a690fe02-0d40-4f0f-ae9d-1662b1037770.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>converges strongly to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\adfe4e40-60e1-4b1b-a7f2-db4bc8469832.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Remark 3.4 The results in this paper improve and extend many recent corresponding main results of other authors (see, for example, [3,4,7,8,10,11,15-19]) in the following ways: (a) we introduce a new class of totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings which contains the classes of the totally quasi-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="tmlimages\4-7401735x\67ff3556-b816-4cbd-aece-3cb2ba5e6924.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and many non-expansive mappings; (b) we extend from a countable family of mappings to the totally quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup; (c) we modify the Halpern type hybrid projection algorithm by using the generalized f-projection operator for uniformly total quasi-G-asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup. For example, Corollary 3.2 extends the main result of Seawan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref11">11</xref>] from the modified Mann type iterative algorithm to modified Halpern iterative by the generalized f-projection method. Corollary 3.3 is the main result of Chang et al.[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41609-ref3">3</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Contributions</title><p>All authors contributed equally and significantly in this research work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank editors and referees for many useful comments and suggestions for the improvement of the article. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant No. 11271330) and the Natural Science Foundations of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No. Y6110270).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.41609-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ya. I. Alber, C. E. Chidume and J. L. Li, “Stochastic Approximation Method for Fixed Point Problems,” Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2012, No. 3, 2012, pp. 2123-2132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. J. Chen and J. H. Huang, “Strong Convergence of an Iterative Method for Generalized Mixed Equilibrium Problems and Fixed Point Problems,” Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2011, No. 2, 2011, pp. 1213-1220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. S. Chang, L. H. W. Joseph, C. K. Chan and W. B. Zhang, “A Modified Halpern-Type Iteration Algorithm for Totally Quasi-&amp;oslash;-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings with Applications,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 218, No. 11, 2012, pp. 6489-6497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.12.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. S. Chang, L. H. W. Joseph, C. K. Chan and L. Yang, “ Approximation Theorems for Total Quasi-&amp;oslash;-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings with Application,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 218, No. 6, 2011, pp. 2921-2931.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.08.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. S. Zhang, L. Wang and Y. H. Zhao, “Multi-Valued Totally Quai-Phi-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Semigrops and Strong Convergence Theorems in Banach Spaces,” Acta Mathematica Scientia, Vol. 33B, No. 2, 2013, pp. 589-599.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0252-9602(13)60022-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Li, “Fixed Point of a Countable Family of Uniformly Totally Quasi-Phi-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Multi-Valued Mappings in Reflexive Banach Spaces with Applications,” Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2013, No. 4, 2013, pp. 6-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. R. Wang, S. S. Chang, L. Wang, Y. K. Tang and Y. G. Xu, “Strong Convergence Theorem for Nonlinear Operator Equations with Total Quasi-&amp;oslash;-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings and Applications,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 2012, 2012, p. 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2012-34</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Quan, S. S. Chang and X. R. Wang, “Strong Convergence for Total Quasi-&amp;oslash;-asymptotically Nonexpansive Semigroup in Banach Spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 2012, 2012, p. 142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Wu and N. J. Huang, “The Generalized f-Projection Operator and an Application,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2006, pp. 307-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700038892</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Li, N. J. Huang and D. R. Regan, “Strong Convergence Theorems for Relatively Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Spaces with Applications,” Computers &amp; Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 60, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1322-1331.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.06.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Saewan, P. Kanjanasamranwong, P. Kumam and Y. J. Cho, “The Modified Mann Type Iterative Algorithm for a Countable Family of Totally Quasi-&amp;oslash;-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings by the Hybrid Generalized f-Projection Method,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 2013, 2013, p. 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-63</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. H. Wang, “Strong Convergence Theorems for Asymptotically Weak G-Pseudo-φ-Contractive Nonself Mappings with the Generalized Projection in Banach Spaces,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2012, 2012, Article ID: 651304.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. H. Wang and Y. H. Xia, “Strong Convergence for Asymptotically Qseudo-Contractions with the Demiclosedness Principle in Banach Spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 2012, 2012, p. 45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Deimling, “Nonlinear Functional Analysis,” Sringer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1985.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00547-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Takahashi, Y. Takeuchi and R. Kubota, “Strong Convergence Theorems by Hybrid Methods for Families of Nonexpansive Mappings in Hilbert Spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 341, No. 1, 2008, pp. 276-286.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Saewan, P. Kumam and K. Wattanawitoon, “Convergence Theorem Based on a New Hybrid Projection Method for Finding a Common Solution of Generalized Equilibrium and Variational Inequality Problems in Banach Spaces,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2010, 2010, Article ID: 734126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/734126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. L. Qin, Y. J. Cho, S. M. Kang and H. Y. Zhou, “Convergence of a Modified Halpern-Type Iterative Algorithm for Quasi-&amp;oslash;-Nonexpansive Mappings,” Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2009, pp. 1051-1055.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2009.01.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. F. Su, H. K. Xu and X. Zhang, “Strong Convergence Theorems for Two Countable Families of Weak Relatively Nonexpansive Mappings and Applications,” Nonlinear Analysis, Vol. 73, No. 12, 2010, pp. 3890-3906.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2010.08.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41609-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. M. Wang, Y. F. Su, D. X. Wang and Y. C. Dong, “A Modified Halpern-Type Iteration Algorithm for a Family of HemiRelative Nonexpansive Mappings and Systems of Equilibrium Problems in Banach Spaces,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 235, No. 8, 2011, pp. 2364-2371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.10.036</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>