<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ENG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1947-3931</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/eng.2013.512123</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ENG-41071</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Finite-Element Modeling of Dynamic Motions of a Constraint Wind Turbine and the System Diagnosis for the Safety Control
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aiwung</surname><given-names>Park</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Technology Education, Mechatronics, Sehan University, Jeonnam, Korea</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>park1@sehan.ac.kr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>11</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1012</fpage><lpage>1016</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>16,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>16,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The aim of this paper is to present a finite element modeling of the dynamic motion of a turbine rotor and its controller design with the mass unbalance under a crack on a rotating shaft. This process is an advanced method to the mathematical description of a system including an influence of a mass unbalance and a crack on the rotor shaft. As the first step, the shaft is physically modeled with a finite element method and the dynamic mathematical model is derived by using the Hamilton principle; thus, the system is represented by various subsystems. The equation of motion of a shaft with a mass unbalance and a crack is established by adapting the local mass unbalance and stiffness change through breathing and gaping from the existence of a crack. This is a reference system for the given system. Based on a fictitious model for transient behavior induced from vibration phenomena measured at the bearings, an elementary estimator is designed for the safety control and detection of a mass unbalance on the shaft. Using the state estimator, a bank of an estimator is established to get the diagnosis and the system data for a controller. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Finite Element; Dynamic Motion; System Diagnosis; Rotor Constraint; Shaft; Wind Turbine; Observer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>To meet high requirement of the structure of modern control systems and to satisfy the reliability of a system, first of all, it is strongly necessary to introduce the mathematical precise description of the given system. Given system used the “Finite Element” which involved the characteristics of the kinetics and kinematics. Especially, when the interest comes to the dynamic behavior by high signal amplitude or various operating points, the safe operation is getting more and more important. This is obviously verified when a part of systems suddenly goes out of function. It can cause an entire system defect, and this is able to bring up a dangerous situation for employee and material losses. To take precautions against these kinds of troubles, many scientists in the world have been making efforts for a long time. For this, it required the inspection during the operation: certainty and system assessment. Only by this way, the sudden appearance of defects and the alteration of the processes can be found out, and the reason for the troubles and the place are detected (Fault Detection and Isolation, FDI). It is important that the fault must be sensed early enough for avoiding the damages in the system (Fault Detection, Isolation and Accommodation, FDIA). When this process goes without man’s help, it’s called automated fault detection, in another word, “gnosis”. Under meaning of fault, we can understand that every abnormal derivation or divergence from the required process behavior and the abrupt fault is meaningful for the safe operation. The FDI process needs certain characteristics being able to give the threshold of the decision: residuum and residue. The method of fault estimated by using the Hardware-redundancy is very costly and less practicable. The model-based methods were presented by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref1">1</xref>]. The methods by creating the parameters or state space estimate were given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref2">2</xref>]. There have been some other ways to settle the problem with fault through the consideration of the property of the robustness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref3">3</xref>]. A practical solution to this problem was the estimation of the states or its velocities by the use of observers which can estimate a system characteristics of linear or nonlinear states and effects as a mode, so called, “Indirect measurement” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref4">4</xref>]. In this work, for this procedure, the mathematical model of the concerned physical system which in the operation time consists of a long shaft and two journal bearings at the ends of the shaft, is derived with the significant remarks such as friction, gravitation, and Coriolis force. With the indirect measurements on two bearings, an observer is designed and is going to be used for the system diagnosis through the comparison within phases.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Finite Element Modeling of a Constrained Rotor</title><p>In order to control and diagnose complex systems, one would like to obtain quantitative mathematical model of a system by symbolic representation involving an abstract mathematical formulation. Though a mathematical model can be adequate for a certain purpose in mind, it never describes the physical phenomenon exactly. Since the final goal of this work is to develop a diagnosis strategy, the inevitable conclusion is that the modeling problem and the diagnosis problem are not independent. Here, the necessary adequate models for the proposed diagnosis policies are built by “finite element models”. These were comprised of the rotor model, the environment model, and model for the interaction between shaft and bearings. Industrial rotors are usually composed of shafts connected by couplings into a kinematic chain with the journal bearing in the operation situation. The shafts can be either cylindrical or revolute, and are driven by given actuators. In this work only cylindrical shaft will be considered. For the purpose of modeling, the three interacting parts such as the blade of the wind driver, the transmission, and the bearings which are connected with the shaft is considered first as an example of the physical model, the (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) shaft is modeled</p><p>into N(=7) segments of shaft i.e. N(=7) sub-finite systems in the numerical matrix form (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Each one is called a subsystem. At both ends of the shaft, there exist dynamics of the bearings. They have the task of system control. For the initial data needed in the operating system, the displacements of the journals are measured up on the bearings at the left and the right side of the shaft (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Assuming that the material properties are homogenous, the energy balances, which include the inner kinetics energy, the inner transform energy, damp energy and the energy from outside, are set up for the mathematical description in form of differential equation as following</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30428"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\8b576028-1a9b-45ba-8941-d5e6cedebb14.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30429"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\af875a59-c980-4707-a3d9-4cc0e9962f00.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30430"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\7de3924f-6c94-4bb6-9af3-c975e9fef034.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, <img src="12-8102075\3da2118b-8948-474c-a5bd-650a698e31fb.jpg" />and <img src="12-8102075\0c3684fb-3914-4383-921c-789ce14d9625.jpg" /> denote the runninr numbers of the finitemente and the initial number of the subsystem</p><p><img src="12-8102075\006dd202-0ac9-4afc-8e55-65ac81bc4288.jpg" />:mass matrix, and<img src="12-8102075\2d310703-9a96-4977-9901-93425bc43e6e.jpg" />:</p><p>stiffness matrix of undamaged section.</p><p><img src="12-8102075\50e47237-f7bd-467a-b480-47f961413a04.jpg" />,<img src="12-8102075\0dbdf1e9-bd0d-4070-8b92-6962d2a4087e.jpg" />: matrix of the damping and gyroscopic matrix<img src="12-8102075\7372a6b3-7de3-46b0-8a0d-7f9b521c8927.jpg" />, <img src="12-8102075\c099b9ae-c6bc-4df3-a6d7-58346b58e97e.jpg" />,<img src="12-8102075\19830904-90a2-4e98-8410-5c759c5fac26.jpg" />:</p><p>displacement vector, velocity vector, and acceleration vector of the system <img src="12-8102075\8e3fa18d-de22-4280-9a59-739551165ca0.jpg" /> input vector, and vector of the nonliearities caused by unexpected influence<img src="12-8102075\8e72df68-50ee-4250-a945-ff0d0a699208.jpg" />:</p><p>degree of freedom of considered elementary subsystem. The consistent matrix is built.</p><p>From now on, the index will be left out with respect to the whole dynamic system. The dynamic behavior of joint system can be modeled by analogy to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref5">5</xref>] as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30431"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\715d884e-034c-4b6c-9853-385a6329adf2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The geometrical data and other detailed information are given in the appendix. It is normally convenient for further operation to write the equation above via state space notation <img src="12-8102075\95064fb9-fe31-4b17-a579-9c7052da4ead.jpg" /> the nonlinearities of the motion created by any defects in system.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30432"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\ce9b102b-355d-4ec7-a3f7-74077bebf47c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The equation of the measurement is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30433"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\ca295b40-c486-4333-bc21-4ba220086a34.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30434"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\304b750a-92ad-4d12-ae2c-4a5b82491f8e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <img src="12-8102075\9352f983-418e-4eaf-82e6-c5c387d89b77.jpg" />is <img src="12-8102075\0b5241bc-a3ce-45e9-b132-a0f9f44162e2.jpg" /> dimensional system matrix which is responsible for the system dynamic with <img src="12-8102075\b97a8abb-156f-4a3a-9263-64353d35b0e2.jpg" /> and . B is the input matrix in the form as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30435"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\a42edde1-46b9-47e0-810e-5cf5768078f5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The factors <img src="12-8102075\30dd8f12-856c-4d7f-a39a-1713b4c1b261.jpg" /> and <img src="12-8102075\8dc8da09-3e28-4882-a556-7463593c1fdd.jpg" /> denote mass unbalances in x and y coordinates respectively as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30436"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\8781b06b-26e9-45c6-b7e8-4de08fd6a049.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30437"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\47974152-07c4-4489-8374-bd06dfd5e908.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="12-8102075\40a8e9e2-93f1-4745-9a0f-b73efc03bf2c.jpg" />is the output vector and the measurement matrix C(t) <img src="12-8102075\e7d0d56d-0ad5-45ba-a357-613c79d07d4c.jpg" />presents <img src="12-8102075\718984ca-44d9-486e-8ee5-198c43ff2694.jpg" /> dimensional measurement matrix, respectively. Tie mass as an input is given as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30438"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\6a910797-74c7-40fe-86b5-23d02113893f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="12-8102075\b7cd9606-7e01-4b05-b4ed-92e4e0d55607.jpg" />denotes <img src="12-8102075\51cdaf04-cb67-4bbb-9dd7-aeb35ca11d1e.jpg" /> dimensional vector of the excitation inputs due to gravitation and unbalances.</p><p>Here, the vector <img src="12-8102075\b2071542-e028-4702-9340-eb61f3fc639c.jpg" /> and <img src="12-8102075\ff03cd71-4fc9-4176-8e66-3da248c40b72.jpg" /> characterizes the <img src="12-8102075\4d510b28-95c0-404a-aab5-c57c7f7cc4d5.jpg" /> dimensional vector of nonlinear functions due to the fault such as mass unbalance and crack, respectively. <img src="12-8102075\c7e934ee-7b83-4357-be56-56fa1be71608.jpg" />and <img src="12-8102075\9d7fd2a8-d5c9-4b35-8578-63b38b5e9b7a.jpg" /> are the input matrices of the linear and the nonlinearities, and the order of <img src="12-8102075\98dca6ac-3b8b-4d19-9d55-c65ba83f7455.jpg" /> is of<img src="12-8102075\d00bd413-7946-4ab2-b84a-27a4f78c36a7.jpg" />. It is presupposed that the matrices <img src="12-8102075\cce520c2-2467-43df-943a-72f74690cf22.jpg" /> the vector <img src="12-8102075\e235471c-6339-4e1f-9859-b74557f5d615.jpg" /> and <img src="12-8102075\c1874a44-b480-4292-a4e4-4b16d655e4df.jpg" /> are already known. Now it remains to reconstruct the unknown line arvector <img src="12-8102075\670d12b1-b46a-4a4d-8286-c04553e84bf8.jpg" /> and nonlinear vector <img src="12-8102075\dae28c58-8112-4682-8e5c-dfe5a0efa61f.jpg" /> which mentions the disturbance force caused by a fault such as mass unbalance and crack. The basic idea is to get the signals from <img src="12-8102075\cfac3149-f070-4fdc-b3dc-4d75e2f89520.jpg" /> approximated by the linear fictitious model, see [6,7]. In terms of the fictitious model, an observer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref7">7</xref>] is designed and to get a signal phase an estimator</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30439"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\b67c319c-e1a5-4a2d-9fab-415a1406506f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Is built. For the guarantee of the observer ability of estimator, the requirement:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30440"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\659cb500-eea4-4442-94e8-bb037b73e446.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="12-8102075\1aa639b7-c00a-47e9-a8f0-b027103affe0.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30441"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\7195c959-4582-4248-814f-b0dba99b6ee5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the requirement of the control ability</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30442"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\8ca49c2e-1b0c-4ccf-bbff-588b1ce61b4b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>must be satisfied. The output equation for the measurement is presented as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30443"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\2fde144a-533f-4337-bc9f-e103523656d8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where matrices <img src="12-8102075\3a9982fd-72d9-4685-950d-5d1aa623411d.jpg" /> and <img src="12-8102075\4f07239e-2d6d-4b0f-821c-de7b5a772606.jpg" /> are the gain matrix of the observer. The above Equation (12) means that the observer consists of a simulated model with a correction feedback of the estimation error between real and simulated measurements. The matrix <img src="12-8102075\3f0d5996-15f0-4da3-87ff-323240848293.jpg" /> has<img src="12-8102075\7d607d79-a958-4172-8020-3ab7e6750e7a.jpg" />. dimensions and represents the dynamic behavior of the elementary observer. The asymptotic stability of the elementary observer can guaranteed by a suitable design of the gain matrices <img src="12-8102075\ce4b256d-c670-49a8-92b9-09a081074c2b.jpg" /> and which are possible under the conditions of detect ability or <img src="12-8102075\8a57b31a-ae49-47dd-aed5-c90ff60e5d8c.jpg" /> observability of the extended system. To enable the successful estimation under the asymptotic stability, the eigenvalue of the considered observer <img src="12-8102075\1aa8c8cc-0fc2-41b5-9ab8-6dd855a8f2b6.jpg" /> must be settled on the left side of the eigenvalue of the given system <img src="12-8102075\fa6e6bf3-7a93-4f49-b300-e3b18912fd35.jpg" /> to make the dynamic of the observer faster than the dynamic of the system. The fictitious model of the fault behaviors is able to be designed using integrator model [7,8] based on the chosen crack model as follows. The observer gain matrices <img src="12-8102075\b2579e7f-a8cc-4be2-9277-464069cb8a61.jpg" /> and <img src="12-8102075\f4322ff5-c8a3-4364-ba9d-7fd910e4dcbb.jpg" /> can be calculated by pole assignment or by the Riccati equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.41071-ref4">4</xref>] as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30444"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\c59de606-e92d-40c5-9fe2-16beb4447b45.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30445"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\d3026bb7-2142-4d48-a624-d560ca83e4da.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The weighting matrix <img src="12-8102075\b61e6ae5-d670-4a0b-9ba8-0cecc4181f96.jpg" /> and <img src="12-8102075\a4d1092c-8092-4f31-8042-869524f1635b.jpg" /> has to be suitably chosen by the trial and errors.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Design of the Estimator</title><p>In the above section it has been studied how to design the elementary estimator for the detection at a given local position. It means that a certain place on the shaft is initially given as the position. The elementary estimator on the bearing has to survey not only the assigned local position but also any other place on the shaft and to give the signals whether a fault exists or not. As it has been known, it is possible to detect the fault assigned certain place along on the shaft. In the case a fault appears at any subsystem in running time, it must be detected as well. But in many cases, it has been shown that it is impossible or very difficult to estimate the position of the fault at all subsystem on the shaft with one estimator. Generally, it depends on the number of the subsystem and the number of estimator. For the estimation of a position of mass unbalance or crack, an estimator bank based on estimator is designed. The main idea is to reconstruct the related forces of a mass unbalance or crack from certain local position to the arranged elementary estimator. This is main task in this section. The structure of the estimator considered is in the work [7,8] presented. It consists of a few elementary estimator depends on the number of the subsystem is modeled. Every elementary estimator which is distinguished from the distribution vector <img src="12-8102075\a9059ac9-b8a3-4ded-beb5-fdf0cef507b8.jpg" /> gets the same input (excitation) <img src="12-8102075\a7588e4d-5146-4970-9cdf-048589da0dc4.jpg" />and the feedback of the measurements, and is going to be set up at a suitable place on the given system. For the appreciate arrangement of Beo, the distribution matrix on the analogy of (15) has been applied. In this way the estimator bank is established with the estimator. To estimate the local place of the fault, there are two steps. First of all, the estimator must be observable to certain local place in the meaning of the asymptotical stability in the system. The requirement has been satisfied by the criteria from [7,8]. This means that the estimator has to be capable of estimating the fault at any location, where estimator is situated on the given system. The unknown fault position is to be found by the estimator arranged in a certain local place with the related crack forces resulting from the crack. To guarantee this condition (14) is supposed to be fulfilled. In this work three estimators are arranged on the left and right bearings</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30446"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\2a15a1dc-7ab1-453b-9903-ae2fde828abe.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The unknown position of a fault is found by the estimator according to the related forces, displacement, and torque of some other location on the shaft.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.41071-formula30447"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-8102075\1ce8d4b4-731b-440e-b909-28cc6600742f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Evaluation through the Simulation on Rotating Shaft</title><p>The estimator bank consists of two elementary estimators. The 1<sup>st</sup> estimator A is situated at the left bearing and 2<sup>nd</sup> estimator B is placed at the right bearing. The criteria to detect a fault, it is necessary to choose the maximal magnitude of the phase from all estimators by the comparison among the phase turned out: forces, displacements and torque. In the case, the estimator shows none of the force, there is not any mass unbalance in this system considered. If any one of the estimator gives the signal of a force the system has a crack in a corresponding position. The figure illustrates the phases with the mass unbalance under the rpm (107.5). As the 1<sup>st</sup> example, the nominal system behavior is considered with given mass unbalance is at the 1<sup>st</sup> of the node in the system.</p><p>The y axis shows the force which denotes nonlinearity and the x axis illustrates the corresponding torque. This phase is nominated as a phase of zero fault. The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows that the estimator recognizes the non existence of a fault. By the comparison of the forces, there is some difference between estimated and simulated phase. However, the derivation is small enough and acceptable.</p><p>The results in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> describe the fault existence (force of mass unbalance) in the 2<sup>nd</sup> node under the influence of a crack in the runtime operation. Up to 3 [sec], the forces of mass unbalance and crack have been overlapped. This denotes that mass unbalance and crack exist in the same place (node) on the shaft. It has been already mentioned that the breathing direction of a crack and the position of the mass unbalance on the radius of the diameter of shaft are on the same line. By the comparison, the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, it is clear to appear a defect. The result in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> illustrates the appearance of the fault as phase 4th node: the forces of mass unbalance, in the middle of the shaft.</p><p>The result in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> tells us the coming up of the fault as phase: the forces of mass unbalance, the forces of mass unbalance, in the 1<sup>st</sup> node under the influence according to the same direction between mass unbalance and the crack on.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>From physical model, the mathematical model of the rotating shaft with bearings using the energy balances, which</p><p>include the inner kinetics energy, the inner transform energy, damp energy and the energy from outside setup for the mathematical description in forms of differential equation, has been presented. Based on this mathematical model, the elementary observer with the measurement only on the bearings and the observer bank have been developed. With this observer bank, the estimation of the fault has been detected in phase. The above method gives a clear relation between the shaft with a mass unbalance and the damaged shaft by a crack and the phenomena caused in phase by means of the measurement at both bearings. Successful theoretical results have been given in graphics. The forces and torques in the results are the internal one, which have been reconstructed as disturbance forces created by the mass unbalance and crack. It has been theoretically shown that it is possible to estimate localization of a mass unbalance with the opposite direction of a crack. The suggested methods are very significant not only for the further theoretical research and development but also for the transfer in experiments.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.41071-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. V. Beard, “Failure Accommodation in Linear System through Self Recognition,” Report MVT-71-1, Man Vehicle Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. J. Patton and S. M. Kangetehe, “Robust Fault Diagnosis Using Eigen Structure Assignment of Observers,” In: R. Patton, P. Frank and R. Clark, Eds., Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems, Prentice Hall, Herausgeber, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Iserman, “Identification Dynamischersysteme, Band I and II,” Spring Verlag, Berlin, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. C. Mueller, “Estimation and Compensation of Nonlinearities,” Proceedings of 1st Asian Conference, Tokyo, 27-30 July 1994, pp. 228-234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. W. Park, “Estimation of a Mass Unbalance under the Crack on the Rotating Shaft,” ICASE, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2000, pp. 228-234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. W. Park, “Crack Detection, Localization and Estimation of a Depth in a Turbo Rotor,” KSME International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2000, pp. 732-729.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. W. Park and P. C. Mueller, “A Contribution to Crack Detection, Localization and Estimation of a Depth in a Turbo Rotor,” ASCC Proceedings, Vol. II, 1997, pp. 427430.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.41071-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. W. Park and S. Cho, “Noise and Fault Diagnosis Using Control Theory,” Proceeding of 13th Korea Automation Control Conference, ICASE, International Session Paper, Seoul, 6-11 July 1998.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>