JEPJournal of Environmental Protection2152-2197Scientific Research Publishing10.4236/jep.2013.412164JEP-40877ArticlesEarth&Environmental Sciences Removal of Alcyon II, CGR, MeV <sup>60</sup>Co Teletherapy Head and Evaluation of Exposure Dose asserTawflk Selim1YasserFouad Lasheen1*MahmoudAli Hassan1TarikMohamed El Zakla1Hot Laboratories and Waste Management Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt.* E-mail:yasser202000@yahoo.com(YFL);06122013041214351440October 2nd, 2013November 1st, 2013 November 28th, 2013© Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 2014This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Teletherapy units containing 60Co source are used in Egypt and worldwide for treatment of cancer diseases. One of the widely used in Egypt is Alcyon CGR MeV. Different radiotherapy facilities need to unload this 60Co unit after being disused. The head containing the source was removed and put into approved package for transportation, after the source kept in safe position. This study describes the planning and removing process of the disused sources and, transports it into its head. The personal doses measured during the process. This work pre-estimates the doses received to workers during the removing process. The workers received doses of approximately 55 μSv during the whole process. This study shows that the original lead head can be used as the source container of this 60Co unit but not as a long term storage option. The 60Co machine was smoothly dismantled and transported by trained workers and driver, using planned and controlled radiation protection, followed by ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) rule.

Alcyon; <sup>60</sup>Co; Teletherapy; Head; Sealed Source1. Introduction

The safety development of nuclear energy and progressive increasing use of radioactive materials and sealed sources in industrial, medical and research applications increase the demand of establishing a procedure for removal and control of high spent radioactive sealed sources (SHARS) from its devices such as a head of teletherapy unit that contains more than 1000 Ci of 60Co. These activities have determined the necessity to formulate and apply an institutional strategy to assure harmless and ecologically rational management of spent sealed sources and radioactive waste conform national safety as well as security and in parallel with and international recommendations.

2. Material and Method

According to the law No.7/2010, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority represented in the Hot Laboratories & Waste Management Center (centralized waste facility, HLWMC) has the responsibility of collecting, conditioning, storing and management of all types of radioactive waste from all Egyptian territory including spent radioactive sealed sources (SRSSs).

The removal process was performed including radiation dose measurement in contact and at 30 cm, and illustrated in Figure 1. The leak test was performed for possible contamination using a swap test and measured by Contamat (THERMO). The radiation dose also was performed for individuals who ranged from 50 to 60

µSv/hr.

The option, to reduce the risks for accidents or incident with spent radiation sources, is the conditioning of high risk sources including embedding in a matrix of cement mortar. This method is applicable for radiation sources with activities up to a few terabecqeurel (TBq), depending on the radionuclide and half life. The method has the advantage of using a simple and cheap technology, material and equipment that is available and it gives a waste package, the stability for a long time under interim storage for conditioning [1,2] and transfer to the storage facility area.

2.1. Planning

HLWMC received formal requests from different radiation oncology institutes to unload the 60Co teletherapy unit of type Alcyon CGR MeV (Figure 2) either to install a new fashion one or replaced with of linear accelerator unit. Figure 2 also describes the source head. The first step of the decommissioning was to calculate the current activity of the 60Co source according to the kinetic law of radioactivity. The initial radioactivity level was 222.64 TBq ≈ 6000 Ci. The current radioactivity on the removal procedure date was 21.1 TBq ≈ 600 Ci. The exposure rate was measured by a Thermo FH40G-L at 30 cm and in contact. The source was also identified using identifiFINDER Target insight, Germany. Figure 3 illustrateS the gamma ray spectrum results which revealed two gamma energy lines at 1332 & 1121 KeV.

2.2. <sup>60</sup>Co Head Description and Installation2.2.1. Radiation Head

1.    lead shield;

2.    wolfram shutter;

3.    depleted uranium sheets inside the head;

4.    “beam off” position of the source;

5.    primary collimator;

6.    light fiber optical system;

7.    quartz lamp;

8.    mirror;

9. cast shell;

10. source information:

a.    source number: 3897

b.    radioactivity level: 222,621 TBq

c.     date: 12 June 95

d.    Radionuclide: 60Co.

2.2.2. Installtion

The installation/system teletherapy machine, Alcyon-II with cobalt 60Co source with initial activity Ai = 222,621 TBq in Oncological Department of the “ASSUIT” University Hospital Center has been in operation since 1996. This system contains four important panels as follow: 1) revolving head with 60Co source; 2) metallic support with its accessories; 3) electronic, electrical & surveillance instruments; 4) the ventilation installation.

The solid metallic frame was putted over the head of tele-therapy machine welding with a metallic dray with sizes: 800 × 800 mm and thickening 45 mm. The source’s window (collimator) was fixed by down head at the metallic plinth-sheet.

The Alycon II is both a teletherapy head and source shipping container, the head is placed in a protective shell made of steel frame, poly wood panels, ceramic wool, wood and belt. The shipping case is a single use item and includes an installation hoist which remains with customer or CGR district manager. CGR Baltimore will stock an installation hoist for emergency use. Source exchanges are not made in the field; rather, a decayed source head is replaced with a new, full-strength source head. The source capsule is contained in a source-holder barrel by means of bayonet type pins with locking clips. As a further precaution, CGR Baltimore, will have a part plug machined to fit the collimator part to ensure source containment within the head. There is an optional beam stop, 50 cm in diameter and 14 cm thick, made of lead with 4% antimony encased in steel, maximum transmission through the beam stop is 0.1% of the primary beam, 99.9% efficient. The gantry will rotate the source head through 0 to 3600 at a variable rote from 0.05 to 1 rpm the source head cannot be angled in relation to the gantry. The iso center is 80 cm ± 2 mm from the source and 120 cm above the floor with a maximum field size of 32 × 32 cm.

3. Result and Discussion3.1. Report of Routine Swipe Test for Contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40877-ref3">3</xref>]

Equipment containing radioactive sources shall be wipe tested for removable radioactive contamination at intervals not to exceed six months. Transport packages for radioactive material also shall be wipe tested for removable radioactive contamination on receipt and prior to shipment. Records of test results shall be kept in microcuries or S.I units and maintained for inspection by the appropriate Regulatory Authority. Sensitivity Factors [4] for 60Co:40 c/min = 0.005 µCi (185 Bq) and 238U:140 c/min = 0.005 µCi. If any wipe tests exceed than the background count per minute the calculation should be in microcuries. The wipe showed no contamination and the results was less than 0.005 µCi for 60Co and 238U.

3.2. Removal Procedures

1)    Remove the rigid plastic cap cover from the head as well as the patient bed and performing the dose rate measurement, in this step the background was 80 nSv/hr;

2)    Follow the safeguard guidelines. The dismantling steps are performed using the following;

a)    Remove the cover of the collimator as illustrated in Figure 2.

b)    Rotate the machine manually or electrically clockwise with 180˚ angle, Figure 4.

c)    Remove, and store the collimator in suitable package.

d)    In each step the dose rate was recorded.

3)    Fix the body of the machine to prevent unbalance change (when the head is removed) using stopper stick in the back which prevent the rotation of the machine due to the weight balance as shown in Figure 5.

4)    Rotates the head again anticlockwise 90˚ to start the removal of the head, Figure 2. This procedure was achieved using the following steps.

a)    Disconnect and shut down the power source, Figure 6.

b)    Start to safe the source to be in safe position by three different locks to prevent the rotation of the shutter. Figure 7. This was done using red metal fixed sheet in semi vertical position. The second step is to put the screw with angle 70˚ in contact perpendicular to the rotating disc. The final step is to put the last screw perpendicular to the rotating wheel.

c)    Remove the four screws that being in contact with the head as in Figure 7, after being carried on the crane and safely transfer the head to the container, Figure 8.

Figure 1 elucidates the skeleton of the head with the dose rate measurement from different positions, in each case before and after dismantling the collimator as well as dismantling the head, and the dose rate measurement on the final package Figure 9.

ReferencesInternational Atomic Energy Agency, “IAEA-TecDoc No. 806,” Vienna, 1995.Manual, “Handling and Processing of Rad Waste from Nuclear Applications,” INP, 2004T. El-Zakla, “Procedure for the Special Arrangement off Site Transport of 60Co Teletherapy Head from Owner to Waste Facility,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1051-1065.HSE-INS-8170, “Off Site Transport of Radioactive Material and Contaminated Equipment,” 2005.RM-VSK-7160, “Transport of Dangerous Goods,” 2005.IAEA, TECDOC-1432, 2004.