<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SNL</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Soft Nanoscience Letters</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0600</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/snl.2013.34A002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SNL-40406</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparative H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S Sensing Characteristics of Fe&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;: Thin Film vs. Bulk
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ishal</surname><given-names>Balouria</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ajay</surname><given-names>Singh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Niranjan</surname><given-names>Suryakant Ramgir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anil</surname><given-names>Krishan Debnath</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aman</surname><given-names>Mahajan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ratish</surname><given-names>Kumar Bedi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dinesh</surname><given-names>Kumar Aswal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shiv</surname><given-names>Kumar Gupta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Material Science Laboratory, Department of Physics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Technical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai, India;</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Technical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>vishalbalouria@yahoo.com(IB)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>1st,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>2nd,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>9th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Comparative investigations of gas sensing characteristics of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in both thin film as well as bulk forms have been performed. Thin film sensors were realized by first depositing Fe films using electron-beam evaporation followed by thermal oxidation. Bulk sensors in the form of pellets were prepared by cold pressing commercial Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> powder with subsequent sintering. Both thin film and bulk Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sensors exhibited a selective and reversible response characteristics towards H<sub>2</sub>S with maximum response at an operating temperature of 250&#176;C and 200&#176;C, respectively. A negligible response towards other interfering gases was observed. Thin film sensors exhibited an enhanced response in comparison to that of pellets.
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fe&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;; Thin Film; Pellets; H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S Sensor</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>H<sub>2</sub>S is a colorless, highly flammable and toxic gas, which in low concentration has an offensive odor similar to that of rotten eggs. As the Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for H<sub>2</sub>S is 10 ppm, there is a need for its detection in either ppm or sub ppm level [1-3]. α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, an intrinsically n-type semiconductor has been widely exploited as a gas sensitive material owing to its good structural and thermodynamical stability along with resistance to photocorrosion. In the present work, H<sub>2</sub>S sensing characteristics of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in both thin film and conventional forms have been investigated and compared. Our results indicate that thin film based sensors exhibited better response towards H<sub>2</sub>S in comparison to that of pellets.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> thin films were prepared in two steps. In the first step, Fe films with ~100 nm thickness were deposited onto pre-cleaned (0001) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> substrates using electron-beam evaporation under a base vacuum of ~1.3 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> Pa. A high purity (99.99%) Fe powder was cold pressed in the form of a pellet and used as source material. These films were subsequently subjected to thermal oxidation at 800˚C in an oxygen environment (O<sub>2</sub> flow: 50 sccm) for 2 h. Bulk sensors in the form of pellets were prepared by cold pressing commercial Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> powder followed by sintering at 800˚C for 2 h. The response characteristics were recorded as a function of temperature, gas (H<sub>2</sub>S, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OH, NH<sub>3</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, NO, and Cl<sub>2</sub>) and their concentrations using a static setup as described elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40406-ref4">4</xref>]. For this purpose, the sensor was mounted on a Pt-100 based heater assembly in a leaktight glass chamber (net volume: 500 ml). Electrical contacts were made by thermally depositing two Au pads (120 nm thick). A desired concentration of the test gas in the chamber was achieved by injecting a known quantity of the test gas using a micro-syringe. The sensor response was calculated using the relations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.40406-formula58613"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-4600086\8bb97ae8-209f-4190-b10b-2f2ba7ac84e5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where G<sub>g</sub> and G<sub>a</sub> are conductance in the presence of test gas and air, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern ob-</p><p>tained for Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> thin film and bulk samples. All the peaks could be assigned to the single phase of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (hematite). The least-square fitting of the pattern indicated hexagonal rhombo-centred cubic unit cell structure with lattice parameters a = b = 5.028 &#197;, c =13.73 and α = β = 90˚, γ = 120˚, which are in agreement with the reported values [JCPDS card no. #79-0007].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> is a plot of % response recorded for both the sensor films as a function of operating temperature towards 10 ppm of H<sub>2</sub>S. It is clearly evident that thin films and bulk sensors exhibit response maxima at 250˚C and 200˚C, respectively. At all the temperatures the response of thin films is higher than that of bulk samples. For instance, thin film sensors show, response maxima of 262% in comparison to 112%, exhibited by bulk samples towards 10 ppm H<sub>2</sub>S.</p><p>A Typical response curves for both the sensor films towards 10 ppm H<sub>2</sub>S is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The conductance of the sensors increases on exposure to H<sub>2</sub>S indicating an n-type response. Thin film sensors exhibited a maximum response towards H<sub>2</sub>S. A baseline drift was observed for bulk sensors.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the selectivity histogram recorded upon exposure to 10 ppm of various reducing and oxidizing test gases. It is clearly evident that both the sensors are highly selective towards H<sub>2</sub>S. A negligible response towards all the other interfering gases was observed.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.40406-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kaur, D. K. Aswal and J. V. Yakhmi, “Chemiresistor Gas Sensors: Materials, Mechanisms and Fabrication,” In: D. K. Aswal and S. K. Gupta, Eds., Science and Technology of Chemiresistor Gas Sensors, Nova Science Publisher, New York, 2007, pp. 33-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40406-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Balouria, A. Kumar, A. Singh, S. Samanta, A. K. Debnath, A. Mahajan, R. K. Bedi, D. K. Aswal, S. K. Gupta and J. V. Yakhmi, “Temperature Dependent H2S and Cl2 Sensing Selectivity of Cr2O3 Thin Films,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol. 157, No. 2, 2011, pp. 466-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40406-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Balouria, S. Samanta, A. Singh, A. K. Debnath, A. Mahajan, R. K. Bedi, D. K. Aswal, S. K. Gupta, “Chemiresistive Gas Sensing Properties of Nanocrystalline Co3O4 Thin Films,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol. 176, 2013, pp. 38-45.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.08.064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40406-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Balouria, A. Kumar, S. Samanta, A. Singh, A. K. Debnath, A. Mahajan, R. K. Bedi, D. K. Aswal, S. K. Gupta, “Nano-Crystalline Fe2O3 Thin Films for ppm Level Detection of H2S,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol. 181, 2013, pp. 471-478.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.02.013</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>