<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.411190</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-40247</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Dependence of Gravity Induced Absorption Changes on the Earth’s Magnetic Field as Measured during Parabolic Flight Campaigns
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>erner</surname><given-names>Schmidt</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>1Fachbereich Biologie, Philipps-Universit?t Marburg, Marburg, Germany
2Fachbereich Biologie, Universit?t Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany </addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>w.2.schmidt@gmx.de</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>11</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1546</fpage><lpage>1553</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>July</day>	<month>11,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Various spectroscopic experiments performed on the AIRBUS ZERO G—located in Bordeaux, France—in the years 2002 to 2012 exhibit minute optical reflection/absorption changes (GIACs) as a result of gravitational changes between 0 and 1.8 g in various biological species such as maize, oats, Arabidopsis and particularly Phycomyces sporangiophores. During a flight day, the AIRBUS ZERO G conducts 31 parabolas, each of which lasts about three minutes including a period of 22 s of weightlessness. So far, we participated in 11 parabolic flight campaigns including more than 1000 parabolas performing various kinds of experiments. During our campaigns, we observed an unexplainable variability of the measuring signals (GIACs). Using GPS-positioning systems and three dimensional magnetic field sensors, these finally were traced back to the changing earth’s magnetic field associated with the various flight directions. This is the first time that the interaction of gravity and the Earth’ magnetic field in the primary induction process in living system has been observed. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>MDWS (Micro Dual Wavelength Spectrometer); GIAC (Gravity Induced Absorption Change); AIRBUS-300-ZERO-G; Parabolic Flight; Micro- and Hypergravity; Three Dimensional Earth’s Magnetic Field; Global Positioning System (GPS); Google Earth</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Working several years on the measurement and analysis of Light Induced Absorption Changes in plants and fungi (LIACs), we expanded this idea to gravisensing, searching for (minute) Gravity Induced Absorption Changes (GIACs). The basic idea is that any stimulus such as light or gravity which is discerned by an organism, consequently causes some kinds of molecular change which could be spectroscopically detectable. For this purpose, we designed a novel, highly sensitive micro dual wavelength spectrophotometer [1,2] and we detected the first GIACs in laboratory bound experiments simply by tilting gravisensitive specimen (Phycomyces, coleoptiles of maize, oat and Arabidopsis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref2">2</xref>]) into the horizontal position (a crude test for GIAC-activity). This was the starting point of our activities between 2000 and 2012 to come: eleven parabolic flight campaigns (PFCs, [1-5]), a drop tower campaign [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref6">6</xref>] and two sounding rocket campaigns (Nov. 2009 and a second one in March 2013, to be published).</p><p>During our recent PFCs, we observed a till then unexplainable small but significant variability of the measuring signals (GIACs). As discussed here, these discrepancies could be finally traced back to the various flight directions, because these, in turn, are inevitably associated with changes of the earth’s magnetic field. The ability to respond to magnetic fields is ubiquitous among the five kingdoms of organisms. E.g., Palmer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref7">7</xref>] reported that the green alga Volvox aureus swims parallel to the horizontal component of the earth’s magnetic field (H<sub>x</sub> as discussed in the present case below). Except for the various forms of orientation of mammals, migrating birds and microorganisms, so far, no biological advantage of any other magneto response is immediately obvious. Thus, most studies as the present one remain largely on a phenomenological level and typically lack mechanistic insight. Even if ferritin has been found in Phycomyces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref8">8</xref>], it only has been discussed in magneto reception of various other specimens such as bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref9">9</xref>], eusocial insects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref10">10</xref>] or honey bees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref11">11</xref>]. Besides the present study, so far no physiological and biochemical reactions in Phycomyces blakesleeanus to magnetic fields have been reported. In addition to ferrimagnetism which is well-known in bacterial magneto taxis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref9">9</xref>] and animal navigation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref12">12</xref>], there are two further mechanisms discussed: 1) the “radicalpair mechanism” relying on the singlet-triplet intercon-version rates of a radical by weak magnetic fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref13">13</xref>], or 2) the “ion cyclotron resonance” mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.40247-ref14">14</xref>]. According to this, ions should circulate in a plane perpendicular to an external magnetic field with their Lamor frequenccies. This will interfere with an alternating electromagnetic field like in parabolic flight maneuvers. Both mechanisms might provide the physical basis of future investigations of biological magneto reception.</p><p>Using two three-dimensional magnetic sensors, we detected a clear-cut correlation of GIACs and particularly the H<sub>x</sub> component of the magnetic field of the earth, i.e. as a function of flight direction, i.e. the azimuth angle. During a flight day, the AIRBUS ZERO G conducts 31 parabolas, each of which lasts about three minutes including a period just under half a minute of weightlessness.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Strains and Culture Conditions</title><p>The wild-type strain of Phycomyces blakesleeanus (Burgeff) is NRRL1555 (-) originally obtained from the Northern Regional Research Laboratory, USDA, Peoria, IL, USA. They were grown in glass shell vials (1 cm diameter &#215; 4 cm height; Flachbodengl&#228;ser, AR Klarglas, M&#252;nnerst&#228;dter Glaswaren-fabrik, M&#252;nnerstadt, Germany) on a synthetic solid medium with glucose. Until the appearance of stage-4b sporangiophores (i.e. with sporangium) of 2.5 cm length the material was kept in transparent plastic boxes at ambient temperature (19˚C - 21˚C) under white incandescent light fluence rate (0.5 Wm<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>). One remark remains to be cogent: Even if the samples are grown under well controlled conditions in a cave of Chateaux Sentoux near the airport, depending on the season the transport to the airport and finally into the plane gives rise to harsh strain (change of temperature, air pressure, humidity).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Parabolic Flights with the A300-ZERO-G</title><p>So far, GI-ACs in response to microand hypergravity were monitored during roughly 1000 parabolas and 11 campaigns organized by the DLR and ESA during the years 2002-2012 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). During a parabolic flight day 31 parabolas (counting from 0 to 30), are flown consecutively in a time period of about 180 minutes covering a distance of approximately 2200 km. Between single parabolas the airplane flies for two minutes in normal modus (1 &#215; g). After every five parabolas an intermission of about 4 minutes of normal flight occurs before the maneuvers of another five parabolas—generally after directional change—is resumed. Each parabola consists of three phases: 1) 25 s at 1.8 &#215; g (pull-up phase; maximal inclination angle = 47˚), 2) 22 s in microgravity (5 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> g, actual parabola), and 3) 25 s at 1.8 &#215; g (pull-out phase, maximal inclination angle of −45˚, i.e. downward flight). During the phases of hypergravity, the g-vector is perpendicular to the floor of the airplane such that persons and objects can stand “normally” as on ground or during horizontal flight. The airplane (Airbus A300- ZERO-G) is located at the international airport of Bordeaux-Merignac and serviced by the company Novespace. The parabolas discussed here were flown over the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Brittany (cf. Figures 4, 5 and 7).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b) shows the assignment of the three space</p></sec></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.40247-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Schmidt, Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, Vol. 58, 2004, pp. 15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-022X(03)00153-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Schmidt, Microgravity-Science and Technology, Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 11-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02870983</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Schmidt, Protoplasma, Vol. 229, 2006, pp. 125-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-006-0217-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Schmidt and P. Galland, Planta, Vol. 210, 2000, pp. 848-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250050689</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Schmidt and P. Galland, Plant Physiology, Vol. 135, 2004, pp. 183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.033282</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Schmidt, Microgravity Science and Technology, Vol. 22, 2010, pp. 79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12217-009-9113-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. D. Palmer, Nature, Vol. 198, 1963, pp. 1061-1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1981061a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. David and K. Easterbrook, The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 48, 1971, pp. 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.48.1.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Blakemore, Science, Vol. 190, 1975, pp. 377-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.170679</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E, Wajnberg, D. Acosta-Avalos, O. C, Alves, J. Ferreira de Oliveira, R. B. Srygley and D. M. S, Esquivel, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 7, 2010, pp. 207-225.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Nicol and M. Locke, Science, Vol. 29, 1995, pp. 1888-1889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5232.1888</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. L. Kirschvink and J. L. Gould, Biosystems, Vol. 13, 1981, pp. 181-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(81)90060-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Ritz, P. Thalau, J. B. Phillips, R. Wiltschko and W. Wiltschko, Nature, Vol. 429, 2004, pp. 177-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02534</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Pazur, C. Schimek and P. Galland, Central European Journal of Biology, Vol. 2, 2007, pp. 597-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-007-0032-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. G. Hopkins and N. P. A. Huner, “Introduction to Plant Physiology,” 4th Edition, APS Press, 2012, 528 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U. J. Pittman, Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, Vol. 1, 1963, pp. 117-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U. J. Pittman, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, Vol. 42, 1962, pp. 430-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps62-070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. V. Krylov and G. A. Tarakanova, Plant Physiology, Vol. 7, 1960, pp. 156-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Galland and A. Pazur, Journal of Plant Research, Vol. 118, 2005, pp. 371-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10265-005-0246-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.40247-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. R. Nanush’yan and V. V. Murashew, Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 50, 2003, pp. 522-526.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>