<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2011.21002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-3762</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Plasma Internal Energy for Toroidal Elliptic Plasmas with Triangularity
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>uhammad</surname><given-names>Asif</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dr.muha.asif@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>01</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2010</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2010</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2010</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Plasma internal energy is not conserved on a magnetic surface if nonlinear flows are considered. The analysis here presented leads to a complicated equation for the plasma internal energy considering nonlinear flows in the collisional regime, including viscosity and in the low-vorticity approximation. Tokamak equilibrium has been analyzed with the magnetohydrodynamics nonlinear momentum equation in the low vorticity case. A generalized Grad–Shafranov-type equation has been also derived for this case.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Plasma Internal Energy</kwd><kwd> Toroidal Elliptic Plasmas</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The linear treatment of the equilibrium equation in tokamaks was carried out by the Russians and result is the Grad-Shafranov equation [1,2]. The poloidal flux solution of the Grad-Shafranov equation determines the magnetic surface in the case when viscosity and nonlinear convective terms are neglected. In this case isobars and magnetic surface are coincidents [3,4]. However if the preceding terms are not neglected, it is not easy to find out a differential equation for the magnetic surface. In this paper, this problem has been treated and a differential equation for the magnetic surface has been found when vorticity is neglected. In the usual Grad-Shafranov equation the internal energy of the plasma does not appear, but in the present case internal energy appears as a quantity to be determined.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Extended Grad-Shafranov Equation</title><p>The time independent MHD momentum equation including viscosity and non-linear convective terms is [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref5">5</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63031"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\2582866e-7229-44b5-be1d-da53557e1d11.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="2-7500244\338a3770-5b99-4878-9c2b-23a54756b170.jpg" />, <img src="2-7500244\690a0d47-8732-46d5-a375-7a9c7ee82665.jpg" />, and <img src="2-7500244\44d92eda-741a-41cb-bd2b-e6a71e763906.jpg" /> are the velocity, current density, and kinematic viscosity coefficient (assumed constant and isotropic), respectively. Here the anisotropic part of the pressure tensor is also neglected. Using the vorticity <img src="2-7500244\c18c08be-affd-4924-89b0-fd76178881d4.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63032"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\663cd9d2-ef5c-41f5-8b07-f17aaef44bb1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the first and last terms in Equation (1) can be written in a more convenient way as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63033"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\2dd00ed0-ffc3-47e9-9682-ca0924c6d35d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63034"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\fb365432-3501-4dfe-ac5d-f132329981e6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The temperature can also be assumed to be constant along a magnetic line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref6">6</xref>], because of the high parallel thermal conduction. Thus the internal energy <img src="2-7500244\d021e28b-9e81-40a0-854b-22d4cfcf93e8.jpg" /> along the magnetic line will depend only on the density,</p><p><img src="2-7500244\e5270104-2c1a-48f0-b067-460237791984.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63035"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\54f6303b-0168-4bbe-a3e7-81d702630e0d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="2-7500244\764bd201-f307-4c26-a4fc-c9ffcb1e6682.jpg" /> refers to a gradient in the plane of a magnetic surface, giving</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63036"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\8519b2a3-88e8-41f0-80a7-5d5c49a073b1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the integral in Equation (6) is performed with T constant along a magnetic line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref6">6</xref>] or in general on any line in the plane of a magnetic surface. The function <img src="2-7500244\ceb15b84-4e84-4c56-8eca-0bd0d2d8441c.jpg" /> is actually the enthalpy of the plasma. This function <img src="2-7500244\bacdafe3-0f2b-416f-94a5-c3df2914d589.jpg" /> can be written explicitly using the entropy function<img src="2-7500244\17df33a2-4305-4806-9eea-5a6407777301.jpg" />. The entropy is conserved in each magnetic surface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref6">6</xref>] and the internal energy <img src="2-7500244\9c7911ce-b1eb-4306-a5c4-dbbba30e5532.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63037"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\ed2cf07d-be9d-4212-9ebe-701cffe50bf6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="2-7500244\ddc75a62-c3fd-4fc0-b893-ee6281fd9c02.jpg" /> is the flux function and <img src="2-7500244\93290798-392e-44e9-abd5-63466b073466.jpg" /> is 1 for an isotherm process or 5/3 for the adiabatic case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref7">7</xref>]. Then <img src="2-7500244\e11379f9-a603-4813-8544-40eb51d1d196.jpg" /> can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63038"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\9e7d321b-e391-4324-93ce-e7da0634b7ab.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now Equation (1) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63039"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\7dcba9f7-54eb-489d-b6cf-ad42b0d90a12.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>An auxiliary function <img src="2-7500244\120ceee8-7395-4095-9b9f-0b42fe98cce3.jpg" /> can be now be defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63040"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\16d6b506-d0a3-454f-abb5-2db969611556.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the equilibrium equation will be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63041"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\6f7950e8-61e5-4655-bf9e-aea27fce191c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Considering now the low vorticity case, that is, <img src="2-7500244\88bc3061-c27a-435c-8137-eb3120433a2e.jpg" />is a perturbation, then the low limit level will be with<img src="2-7500244\f206808f-01f9-4410-a577-433ba75f6be6.jpg" />. Then the previous equation becomes,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63042"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\b75637ab-4659-4191-a227-0d3217dc5e5d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As in the linear case, the procedure to derive the GradShafranov equation can be followed obtaining an extended Grad-Shafranov equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63043"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\7f8cdb0e-9f20-491e-b7e5-a35a26463be8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="2-7500244\0f7bed77-9159-4227-b504-d65fcbe39ee4.jpg" /> is the same kind of invariant as in the linear case and the operator <img src="2-7500244\c4bdd1fa-cb76-4672-8242-cbf06e117c74.jpg" /> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63044"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\0fc3ea0e-745b-4797-913c-9f98f58bdee7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The internal energy in this extended Grad-Shafranov equation is a function of<img src="2-7500244\0bd40f66-a0df-4637-bb58-8eb0d2d8d93e.jpg" />. Since F is only a function of<img src="2-7500244\e4b43155-1fa5-4815-ab69-b843e5ad8296.jpg" />, and <img src="2-7500244\5be35196-afe6-485c-8286-de39cac1712d.jpg" /> is function of <img src="2-7500244\2e8fb6ea-7a0f-40c2-ac07-d57637bb71e3.jpg" /> then Equation (12) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63045"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\3dfc4407-eb3c-4c7d-90a6-b2daaf67d96d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>That is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63046"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\3d01347d-9941-400f-bfc6-faf858001c12.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since for the ideal MHD equilibrium confinement the internal energy and magnetic surfaces are coincident, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63047"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\4fc82815-0dd1-4b1d-950d-7a9623734fc6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref8">8</xref>], the operator</p><p><img src="2-7500244\f7bc4453-7db4-4e60-8a36-4cde8c0a397c.jpg" /></p><p>and because of the axissymmetry condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63048"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\19bb9696-99a5-4d5e-a832-5e883ce6f9e3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref8">8</xref>], we also know<img src="2-7500244\f1529307-7952-4abb-a517-2eed4e55e458.jpg" />. Considering the <img src="2-7500244\60db5180-c3ee-48f8-84c2-206518969768.jpg" />-component of Equation (17), the following differential equation is obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63049"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\ad0ad029-17ca-46f2-bc43-b7271a44dbb8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then it leads to new surface invariant</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63050"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\77e5a812-4a49-432a-b7c3-4f9663e27afb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref9">9</xref>], we know</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63051"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\652335f7-d9a1-4aad-8fd4-defe1b7aaf5b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the plasma pressure equilibrium equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref8">8</xref>], thus</p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63052"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\84810db9-e7c3-4e87-9320-485cc84332a6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we put together Equations (19), (21) , and (22) we obtain</p><p><img src="2-7500244\7be78ec1-cddd-4196-8a80-5a145cc96167.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.3762-formula63053"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-7500244\0636d442-4a3b-44c9-b6da-9782dc271211.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Experimental observations show that neutral beam injection and rf heating induces poloidal and toroidal plasma rotations in tokamaks. The analysis of plasma equilibrium performed by several authors [3-11] is much more complicated than those of plasma confinement with no rotation. The Grad–Shafranov equation has to be analyzed coupled with a Bernoulli-type equation and furthermore there are regions where that equation is of hyperbolic type instead of elliptic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.3762-ref5">5</xref>]. As it is well known, if nonlinear convective terms are included in the momentum equation, pressure is no longer a constant on the magnetic surfaces, but those terms cannot be neglected when significant poloidal or toroidal flows occur in tokamaks. However, as we show in this paper, if low vorticity can be assumed, important simplifications can be performed and some results can be obtained, which seem to be generalizations of those where convective terms were neglected. On the other hand this low vorticity approximation seems to be suitable for the H-mode in tokamaks, because of the characteristic low plasma turbulence induced by internal transport barriers [12-14]. Here a magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) treatment of plasma equilibrium is performed for low-vorticity plasmas including nonlinear convective terms and viscosity. Non-pressure-conserved functions have been found, which are characteristic of this kind of plasmas. Besides a partial differential equation (PDE) has also been derived for a function similar to the poloidal flux, which becomes the usual Grad–Shafranov (GS) equation, if the linear simplification is introduced. That kind of equation is referred here as an extended GS equation.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>A simplified equilibrium analysis in tokamak has been performed for the nonlinear momentum equation with viscosity in the low vorticity case. Internal energy is not constant now on magnetic surfaces, but our analysis shows that other significant magnetic surface new invariant appears, which are useful to determine equilibrium conditions. An extended Grad-Shafranov (GS) -type equation has been derived in this case. This new equation includes the usual invariant <img src="2-7500244\4357bfce-aee3-4065-b99b-9c709ceb9151.jpg" /> depending on the toroidal magnetic field plus some additional functions such as Internal energy. This extended GS equation is a PDE elliptic type, which could be a little more laborious to calculate than the usual GS equation.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.3762-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Grad and H. Rubin, “Hydromagnetic Equilibria and Force-Free Fields,” Proceedings of the 2nd UN Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, Vol. 31, 1958, p. 190.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
V. D. Shafranov, “Plasma Equilibrium in a Magnetic Field,” Reviews of Plasma Physics, Vol. 2, 1966, p. 103. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
J. W. Bates and D. C. Montgomery, “Toroidal Visco-Resistive Magnetohydrodynamic Steady States Contain Vortices,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 5, 1998, 2649-2653. 
doi:10.1063/1.872952</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
D. C. Montgomery, Abstracts and Proceedings Current Trends in International Fusion Research: A Review, Washington D. C., March 2001, p. 67. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
R. Iacono, A. Bondeson, F. Troyon and R. Gruber,  “Axisymmetric Toroidal Equilibrium with Flow and Anisotropic Pressure,” Physics of Fluids B, Vol. 2, 1990, 1794-1803. 
doi:10.1063/1.859451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
P. Martin et al., “Conserved functions and extended Grad-Shafranov equation for low vorticity viscous plasmas with nonlinear flows,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 12, 2005, p. 102505. 
doi:10.1063/1.2080587 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
L. Guazzotto, R. Betti, J. Manickam and S. Kaye, “Numerical study of tokamak equilibria with arbitrary flow,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, 2004, 604-614. 
doi:10.1063/1.1637918</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
P. Mart?n, “Magnetohydrodynamic treatment of collisional transport in toroidal configurations: Application to elliptic cross sections,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 7, 2000, 2915-2922.  
doi:10.1063/1.874142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
P. Mart?n and M. G. Haines, “Poloidal magnetic field around a tokamak magnetic surface,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 5, 1998, 410-416. 
doi:10.1063/1.872740</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
E. K. Maschke and H. Perrin, “Exact solutions of the stationary MHD equations for a rotating toroidal plasma,” Plasma Physics, Vol. 22, 1980, 579-594. 
doi:10.1088/0032-1028/22/6/007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
E. Hameiri, “The equilibrium and stability of rotating plasmas,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 26, 1982, 230-237. 
doi:10.1063/1.864012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
M. Tendler, “Important Issues of Physics of Improved Confinement in Tokamaks,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 256, 1998, 205-218. 
doi:10.1023/A:1001183424542</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
F. L. Hinton and G. M. Staebler, “Particle and energy confinement bifurcation in tokamaks,” Physics of Fluids B, Vol. 5, 1993, 1281-1288. 
doi:10.1063/1.860919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.3762-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
M. Tendler, “Different Scenarios of Transition into Regimes with Improved Confinement,” Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 39, 1997, B371-382. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/39/12B/028</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>