<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJCS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-3202</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjcs.2013.36039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJCS-37547</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Arch Reconstruction in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Handling the Diminutive Aorta
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>rancisco</surname><given-names>J. Boye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Frank</surname><given-names>A. Pigula</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>fboyecvs@icloud.com(RJB)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>198</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>September</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The
   
  diminutive aorta presents technical challenges in the palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Furthermore, aortic arch caliber changes and variable great vessel relationships can add complexity to an already difficult arch repair. We describe a technical approach that simplifies the aortic reconstruction and makes the procedure more generalizable and reproducible.
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Arch; Hypoplastic; Reconstruction; Norwood; Technique</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS) is a spectrum of cardiac malformations that has a high morbidity and mortality. HLHS is comprised of underdeveloped left sided heart structures, characterized by aortic atresia or severe stenosis, which results in a small left ventricle and a hypoplastic, sometimes diminutive ascending aorta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.37547-ref1">1</xref>]. Without surgical intervention, one-month mortality approaches 95% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.37547-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The Norwood procedure is one of the most technically challenging surgical interventions and remains a high risk operation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.37547-ref3">3</xref>]. The arch reconstruction technique in such patients can be quite demanding, and achieving an adequate three dimensional conformation of all components (ascending aorta, aortic arch, proximal descending aorta and pulmonary root), coupled to the homograft patch can be difficult. Furthermore, the aortic reconstruction impacts not only coronary perfusion, but the adequacy of the distal arch and the neo-aortic valve as well. Because of this, we describe a simple, reproducible technique that simplifies the surgical approach to the diminutive aorta in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Technique</title><p>Following a median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass is instituted with a single arterial cannula placed into the brachiocephalic artery, through a 3.5 mm Gore-Tex tube graft (Gore-Tex; W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ), and a single venous cannula into the right atrium through the appendage. Pulmonary blood flow is controlled by temporary occlusion of the pulmonary artery branches. While cooling down to 18˚C, the aorta and main pulmonary artery (MPA) are fully mobilized.</p><p>Under standard low-flow regional perfusion, the neck vessels are temporarily occluded; an antegrade dose of cardioplegia is administered through the arterial cannula itself and the ductus arteriosus is divided. Then, the atrial septum is resected, through the right atrial appendage cannulation site, leaving an unrestrictive atrial septal defect.</p><p>The MPA is transected at the bifurcation, followed by division of the aorta just above the level of the MPA root. The aortic ductal stump is then amputated and the aorta is opened along the inner curvature. When present, the coarctation shelf is resected and an anastomosis along the greater curvature of the descending aorta (with or without interdigitation) is performed. A suitable homograft triangular patch is then fashioned and used to reconstruct the aortic arch (Figures 1(b) and (c)). Once complete, the arch reconstruction creates a tubular, symmetrical and funnel-shaped structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)).</p><p>Following the arch reconstruction, the proximal aortocoronary to pulmonary anastomosis is performed, using vertical counter-incisions in both great vessels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)). Of note, the aortocoronary stump should be taller</p><p>than the pulmonary root, this will diminish the wall tension when the arch is filled with pressured blood, keeping the aortocoronary ostium patent.</p><p>The new systemic outlet reconstruction is completed by fashioning an end-to-end aortic anastomosis between the aorto-pulmonary root to the distal augmented arch (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(e)). An important consideration is that the proximal and distal ascending aorta tissue does not necessaryily have to match each other, avoiding torsion on the aortopulmonary anastomosis, and the potential for coronary insufficiency.</p><p>Pulmonary blood flow is reconstituted according to the surgeon’s preference (modified Blalock-Taussig shunt or a right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>The Norwood procedure remains to be a technical challenge. There are several modifications of the original procedure, including the transection of the ascending aorta introduced by van Son, Mosca and Thistlewaiste to reconstruct the systemic outlet in ventriculoarterial discordance and hypoplastic aorta [4-6]. These techniques, as the one we describe in normally related great vessels for a diminutive ascending aorta, concomitant aortic arch hypoplasia with or without coarctation, avoid a spiraling incision of the aorta from the inner curvature of the aortic arch to the medial aspect of the ascending aorta, reducing the risk of torsion of the aortic root with its inherent risks of obstruction of the coronary ostia and aortic or pulmonary valve regurgitation.</p><p>Coarctation excision reduces the incidence of late arch obstruction, and we routinely excise the coarctation shelf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.37547-ref7">7</xref>]. Because recoarctation and acute arch angles increase the wall shear stress and energy loss, a uniform and unobstructed anatomic result may reduce the workload on the single ventricle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.37547-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>We have found that this modification of the arch reconstruction within the Norwood procedure, by creating two tubes, which result in an end to end aortic anastomosis, simplifies the procedure, makes it reproducible and creates a smooth neoaortic arch.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.37547-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Noonan and A. Nadas, “The Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: An Analysis of 101 Cases,” Pediatric Clinics of North America, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1958, pp. 1026-1056.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Sinha, S. Rusnak, H. Sommers, R. Cole, A. Muster and M. Paul, “Hypoplastic Left Ventricle Syndrome: Analysis of Thirty Autopsy Cases in Infants with Surgical Consideration,” American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1968, pp. 166-173. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(68)90316-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Bacha, et al., “Measurement of Technical Performance in Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: The Stage I Norwood Procedure,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 4, 2008, pp. 993-997. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. van Son, V. Reddy, G. Haas and F. Hanley, “Modified Surgical Techniques for Relief of Aortic Obstruction in {S,L,L} Hearts With Rudimentary Right Ventricle and Restrictive Bulboventricular Foramen,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 110, No. 4, 1995, pp. 909-915. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(05)80157-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Mosca, et al., “Modified Norwood Operation for Single Left Ventricle and Ventriculoarterial Discordance: An Improved Surgical Technique,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 64, No. 4, 1997, pp. 1126-1132. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00848-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Thistlewaite, J. Myers, R. Siewers and J. Ettedegui, “Technique for Repair of Single-Ventricle Hearts with Transposition on the Great Arteries and Aortic Arch Hy-Poplasia,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 1, 1999, pp. 260-262. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01209-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Bautista-Hernandez, G. Marx, K. Gauvreau, F. Pigula, E. Bacha, J. Mayer and P. del Nido, “Coarctectomy Re-Duces Neoaortic Arch Obstruction in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 133, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1540-1546. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.37547-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Itatani, K. Miyaji, Y. Qian, J. Liu, T. Miyakoshi, A. Murakami, M. Ono and M. Umezu, “Influence of Surgical Arch Reconstruction Methods on Single Ventricle Workload in the Norwood Procedure,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 144, No. 1, 2012, pp. 130-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.013</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>