<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">POS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Positioning</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2150-850X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/pos.2013.43024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">POS-36350</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Growth and Inhibition of Equatorial Anomaly Prior to an Earthquake (EQ): Case Studies with Total Electron Content (TEC) Data for Major EQs of Japan 2011 and Indonesia 2012
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>inakshi</surname><given-names>Devi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alaka</surname><given-names>Medhi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arup</surname><given-names>Jyoti Dev Sarma Sarma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ananda</surname><given-names>Kumar Barbara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Gauhati University, Guwahati, India.</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>md555@sify.com(ID)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>08</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>240</fpage><lpage>252</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>13th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>May</day>	<month>12th,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>27th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The processes leading to the growth and inhibition of equatorial anomaly before major earthquake (EQ) 
  were
   viewed in this paper by examining global Total Electron Content (TEC) 
  that 
  contour
  ed
   over longitude sectors covering Africa to Pacific, in association with EQ events of Japan (M
   
  =
   
  9) that occurred at 135
  &#176;E to 145&#176;E and 35&#176;N to 40&#176;N, on March 9 and 11
  ,
   2011 and of Indonesia (M = 8.6) that took place at 2.311&#176;
  N, 93&#176;E, in April 11, 2012. The paper focuses on the development of abnormal increase in density in the night sector around—10&#176;
   
  latitude zone prior to the two major EQ events, though their epicenters are separated widely from the anomaly region. The F-layer density variations from rele
  vant locations and TEC features obtained from GPS at Appleton anomaly crest station are utilized as supporting inputs. The possible sources leading to the anomalous development in density are discussed in the frame of EQ time con
  se
  quences of lithospheric-atmospheric processes between the equator and beyond. The role of electric field generated by pre EQ preparatory activities and dynamical coupling modes through seismic fault line are brought in to the ambit of discussion.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>TEC Global; Earthquake; Equatorial Anomaly; F-Layer Density</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ionospheric parameters as tools for prediction of an earthquake have been adapted by many workers [1-7]. However, solar geomagnetic influences on ionosphere being significant, the processes of filtering the earthquake (EQ) induced effects from these parameters are difficult exercises. The situation becomes more complex at Appleton anomaly zone [8-11] where ionisation density is transported up by equatorial electric field (E) through EXB drift process. Therefore, at off equatorial stations i.e., round Appleton Anomaly region (&#177;20˚ geomagnetic latitudes), the ionisation density and Total Electron Contents (TEC), have a strong component of migrating electron density. Such movement is also possible from epicentre region during EQ time electric field generated in its preparatory processes [12-14]. Added to these aspects, the anomaly zone undergoes changes with solar geomagnetic environments as well as on coupling dynamics between equatorial and magnetospheric processes [15-18], thereby making EQ time density changes on TEC or ionisation density around the anomaly as multifactor events [19-21]. There are also reports showing apparent modifications in ionisation density and on TEC by pre earthquake influences on lower atmosphere [22- 26].</p><p>All these activities make identification of earthquake related dynamics over extended latitudinal and longitudinal sectors very complex especially when anomaly feature is adapted as a tool of EQ precursor as the paper aims. Here, we analyze the growth and inhibition pattern of anomaly zone from global TEC data covering sectors from east Africa to west pacific; the feature so obtained is examined in association with major Japan EQ (JEQ) of March 11, 2011 epicentre at 38.322˚N, 142.369˚E (M = 8.9) and Indonesia EQ (IEQ, M = 8.6) of April 11, 2012 occurred at 2.311˚N, 93˚E. The two events are so selected that EQ time anomaly coupling dynamics could be brought in to focus at widely separated zones around and beyond equatorial anomaly region limited within &#177;20˚ geomagnetic latitudes. TEC data collected from the GPS receiving setup at Guwahati (26˚10'N, 91˚45'E) along with F-layer peak density (NmF2) data from relevant stations are used as supporting inputs.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Observations</title><p>A representative profile of TEC obtained from dual frequency GPS observation at Guwahati, an anomaly crest station (26˚10'N, 91˚45'E) is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, to highlight a few features that will be utilized in the analysis to follow. The figure shows that the diurnal TEC reaches its maximum not at the local noon as expected (point A in the figure) but one or two hours from it (marked as B in the figure). Such enhancements in density after the local noon hours are generally associated with the sources at the equator from where electron density is pushed up by the EXB drift process, to be moved down along the field lines to off equatorial region, enhancing the total density at the recipient location. This is the Appleton anomaly phenomenon, described in brief in the introduction. The position of the peak density depends on magnitude of E field and also on the time of its appearance, although in general, the phenomenon is significant in post noon hours as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. In this paper we would examine growth and inhibition of such anomaly zones from global TEC data over wide longitude sectors, the features so obtained will be associated with the two major EQs as described.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Abnormal Appearance of Anomaly Zone Prior to Japan EQ (JEQ)</title><p>The very strong JEQ of March 11, 2011, was preceded by another event of March 9 with M = 7.3 occurring at</p><p>38.322˚N, 142.369˚E; the global TEC maps prior to, during and after these events obtained from the Australian meteorological department (www.ips/satellite.au) are presented in Figures 2(a)-(d). The TEC contour plots of the figures correspond to 11 UT - 12 UT, i.e. when epicentre zone of 130˚E to 140˚E falls in the night sector, so that abnormality if any could be easily identified from relatively low background night time density. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) shows TEC situation seven days prior to the EQ when a fully developed equatorial anomaly was present, as expected, at the 20˚E longitude at 12UT i.e. around local noon near East African zone. This is the Normal Equatorial Anomaly (NEA) at 20˚E off equatorial region. But 6 days prior to the JEQ, the NEA at 20˚ E longitude during local daytime had dissipated but a high dense TEC region is formed in the eastern sector in the longitude range 100˚E - 140˚E at 12UT, i.e., at the local midnight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)) hours. This abnormal appearance of high density zone i.e., “EQ time Equatorial Abnormality” (EEA) is seen up to March 8. On March 9 i.e. the day of one of the strongest EQs, the anomaly shifts to NEA sector of 20˚E to reappear again as EEA at 100˚E -140˚E longitude on March 10 before the devastating EQ of March 11. The EEA gradually weakens and disappeared after the EQ as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d). However, the unusual development of such anomaly though weak, lasted for the entire month associated with the number of relatively small EQs, as an aftereffect of the JEQ.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Abnormal Appearance of Anomaly Zone Prior to Indonesia EQ (IEQ)</title><p>The IEQ, that occurred at the epicentre 2.3˚N and 93˚E on April 12, 2012 is one of the strongest in recent times with magnitude of M = 8.6. We present in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> the global TEC map before, during and after this event. More than 6 days prior to the IEQ <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a), the NEA, as expected, was seen in the African sector ( 20˚E ) at local day hours (11 UT-13 UT). But 4 days before the event, the NEA of 20˚E zone dissipates and an EEA appears synchronously in the western Pacific sector showing large accumulation in TEC at around −10˚N and 90˚E - 100˚E longitude, i.e. during the local midnight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). The TEC map further shows presence of a fully developed EEA to the day of the EQ and its disappearance following the IEQ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). The significant point to be noted is that, while the EEA was formed around 100˚E - 140˚E longitude prior to the JEQ, before the IEQ the EEA was seen at 90˚E - 100˚E, that is near to the longitude sectors of the epicentre of each event. We also note a few more cases of abnormal high density zones during night sector and around the EEA zone, the reference of which is brought in the sections to follow.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Association between Magnitude of EEA and Earthquakes in the Longitude Sector 90˚E to 145˚E</title><p>The magnitude of EEA is determined from the increase in TEC value within the anomaly zone with respect to ones prevailing in the NEA zone at that hour and also the longitudinal spread of the EEA. Adopting these two aspects, the EEA strength is defined in grades (arbitrary unit) from 0.5 to 10, with 40 TEC U as minimum value of the TEC and 80 TECU as the maximum, during the period 10 UT -12 UT. The magnitude so derived is presented from March 1 to 15, 2011 in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a), also shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) the strength of EQ events occurring within −10˚N to 45˚N ; 90˚E to 145˚E covering the latitudinal /longitudinal zones of the two selected EQs.</p><p>The figures show that the magnitude of EEA increased prior to both the JEQs of March 9 and 11 with a sharp decrease on the day of the event. However, this result does not isolate the effects on the EEA of large number of relatively small EQs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)) occurring on the same day within this large latitude-longitude area. To identify the EEA with JEQ we now take the earthquake events that occur only within the narrow longitude and latitude zone of 120˚E - 140˚E and 30˚N - 40˚N (around the epicentre of JEQ) as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a). One can note from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> that magnitude of EEA increased just before the JEQ events and reverts back to low value on the day of the earthquake, suggesting presence of a strong link between growth of EEA and the JEQs.</p><p>This observation receives support as we do not see any systematic relation between the EEA magnitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)) and the equatorial EQ events as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, also that no strong equatorial EQ event occurred during this period and within the longitude zone where EEA was</p><p>developed. Thus, the formation of EEA demonstrates a strong association with high latitude EQs predominantly occurring within the 30˚N - 40˚N latitudes over the selected longitudes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) during this month. The shifting of anomaly status from NEA at 20˚E to EEA at 120˚E - 140˚E (coinciding with epicentre position), prior to these EQs as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, suggests coupling of the one with the other. The see saw effect of growth of EEA and decay of NEA associated with the impending EQs, is also displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>, when the magnitudes of the two parameters are plotted for the relevant days of March 2011. The presence of strong EEA is seen as a bright band around the two major EQ days.</p><p>Unlike the March 2011 EQs that occurred mostly at high latitudes, April 2012 events were observed in the −5˚N to +5˚N within our interested longitude zone (90˚E to 140˚E) as displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. We select here three significant EQ cases of April 11 (i.e. IEQ of M = 8.6), April 16 (M = 6.8) and April 20 (M = 6.8), 2012, to examine association of the EQ with the growth and inhibition of EEA and NEA. The TEC global maps of these three days are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 to highlight the fact that each contour map demonstrates growth of an EEA instead of the NEA that should have been formed at</p><p>this hour (10 UT - 11UT) around 20˚E - 30˚E longitude. It is also significant to note that the EEA positions of 95˚ E, 140˚E and 130˚E longitudes coinciding with longitude of the corresponding epicenters which were (a) 2.3˚N, 93˚E, (b) −5.46˚N, 147.12˚E and (c) −1.62˚N, 134.28˚E, respectively.</p><p>This analysis along with that for March 2011events thus supports the fact that the development of EEA is coupled to the strong EQ events whether occurred at the equatorial or at high latitude zone.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion and Conclusions</title><p>The explanations to the observed development of the EEA and shift of this anomaly zone towards the longitude of epicentre of the two most devastating recent EQs one at mid latitude and the other at the equator, are difficult to put forward with present understandings on equatorial anomaly, though the underlying physics and dynamics involved with the process are well established. The growth of such anomaly is coupled with conductivity of the ionosphere under an impressed electric field that becomes anisotropic in presence of a magnetic field. The result is generation of three conductivities namely Longitudinal, Pedersen and Hall conductivities. The Hall conductivity amongst the three is significant in this context. Because the Hall current flowing in a direction &#160;perpendicular to both the electric and magnetic fields generates a force that moves the plasma upwards through the process E &#180; B drift that causes transportation of ionization from the equator to regions off the equator, creating a minimum density over the magnetic equator, while causing maxima at latitudes to 20˚ (geomagnetic) north and south of the equator [8-11]. The effective enhancement of Ionization density or TEC caused by this process at off equatorial stations is generally obtained just after local noon as displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. One can also see formation of such density maximum zones, i.e. Normal Equatorial Anomaly (NEA) around local noon (at 20˚E longitude) at 12 UT, in the global TEC map of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a). But the development process of NEA is dissipated prior to the two strong EQs of this study. This apparent inhibition of NEA is replaced by an anomalous development of a high density zone at the near equator in the night sector; a phenomenon we name as EEA. The coincidence of the formation of the EEA with the longitudenal sector of the epicentre, as revealed through analysis of these two major EQs is significant. This observation may not be explained only through the proposals offered by many workers while examining relation between EQ events and modifications in ionization density or in the TEC [6,12,14,19,27,28]. One such hypothesis on EQ time changes in density peak at low-latitudes is due to manifestation of Appleton type E&#180;B charge movement specially when the epicentre lies near to the equator and in such case E is the EQ induced electric field. It is shown by Devi et al. [6,28] that low-latitude earthquakes can also force similar changes to electron density. Devi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref28">28</xref>], have also observed that when model IRI is used to estimate earthquake time low latitude TEC, the input values on ‘F-region peak ionization density’, need to be modified appropriate to “earthquake time variations in TEC”, for achieving concordance between model output and TEC observed noontime values. For this purpose changes in F-peak density they considered are the result of dumping of ionisation to low latitude station from the epicentre through Appleton anomaly process, initiated by the EQ generated E-field. These observations and results thus suggest that E-field could contribute significantly in changing ionisation density around epicene zone. But to correlate association of the EEA i.e., a high density zone near the equator at the night sector with density modification near mid-latitude epicenter is difficult. To examine such relation we map the NmF2 data available during the period of JEQ, at I-Cheon (37.14˚N, 124˚E) near epicentre zone and also at Darwin (−12.4˚N, 130.9˚E) a location where EEA was formed. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 shows daily NmF<sub>2</sub> values and their monthly mean (presented by solid and dashed blue lines respectively) over Darwin (a station at the equatorial anomaly zone). The red and black portions of the curves in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 indicate positive and negative ionospheric effects. One can see a large</p><p>accumulation of ionisation density especially on the night of March 8, (one day prior to EQ of March 9) at Darwin, and a well developed EEA in global TEC map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> d) at similar latitude/longitude position. In I-Cheon, the station near to the epicentre, the increase in density is less intense by 50% than that of Darwin, suggesting a possible transportation from epicentre to the EEA zone. One can also note from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a) the development of strong negative effect on the day of the major JEQ of March 11, especially at Darwin. In this aspect the presence of a magnetic storm as displayed by DST variations of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 that coincides with the March 11 EQ is to be noted. This negative density effect can be associated with the magnetic storm, a similar feature is also observed from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a), for the storm of March 1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). However, the ionospheric storm time dynamics being not the subject of this paper, the negative density variation noted on the major EQ day i.e. on March 11 will not be further dealt with.</p><p>The IPS TEC global map shown here is produced with IRI model by taking real-time foF2 data obtained from the region. Therefore, the nighttime increase in NmF2 over Darwin supports the growth of EEA as reflected in the TEC global map. But how such anomaly is coupled to the major EQs occurring at latitude as high as of 35˚N, is a question. It is equally intriguing to note the adjustment of EEA longitude to epicenter longitudes. Considering all the observed features we can also look for the explanation to the hypotheses of EQ time equatorial/low latitude anomaly that suggest pumping of ionization from epicentre to off epicentre location by the EXB drift but possibly in this case the transportation process is significant during anomaly reversal time. It is well known that the day time anomaly caused by the eastward E field reverses after sunset with the development of westward electric filed. Therefore, EXB upward drift decreases during reversal time, goes to negative i.e. downward direction and reverse fountain effects become operational [29,30] and westward electric fields may result to nighttime enhancements in electron concentrations in mid latitude F-region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref29">29</xref>], coupled with small increase in geomagnetic potential. Along with the mid-latitude increase in density, the downward compression of ionization due to large downward ExB drift can produce the nighttime increase in NmF2/TEC at the equator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>The large increase in nighttime TEC near equator prior to the JEQ i.e. the EEA, may be the result of such dumping from epicentre due to EQ induced westward E field, suggesting development of coupling processes between high and low latitude during EQ preparatory processes. The horizontal component of magnetic field at the location of the epicentre though weak, but the situation of zero declination contour lines [32,33] that touches epicentre to the near equatorial high density zone of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, supports possible coupling between the mid latitude epicentre and the near equatorial high density location within the same longitude zone. In case of the IEQ, the zero declination contour between epicentre and high density zone of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> supports such possibility of transportation to the epicentre longitude. Interestingly the zero-declination contour line follows the tectonic fault line of an active seismic zone, as displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1. Further, association of these major EQs with ongoing magnetic pole movement process that is related to inner core and tectonic status needs to be considered in the light of differential rotation of the core. Such rotation generating magnetic field and coupling process between modular structures of earth interior, resulting to a dynamo effect that may generate a two-way traffic of migrating electrons from one strong anomaly zone to another may be in a wide span of longitudes but in the same latitudinal situation, coupled by the similar magnetic declination contour. Such processes may result to dissipation of strong anomaly zone like at 20˚E (in this case) and development of anomaly in the night sector.</p><p>Along with this explanation, one has to look for other sources which are active prior to an impending EQ, specialty in the generation of a dynamical coupling from lower to atmosphere. In such an attempt Molchanov and Hayakawa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref34">34</xref>] have shown that seismo-electromagnetic emissions mainly in lower frequencies propagate upwards, locally increasing the temperature of the ionosphere and may penetrate into the ionosphere/magnetosphere, resulting precipitation of magnetospheric highenergy charged particles into the lower ionosphere through wave-particle interactions. But seismogenic wave intensity being weak, such impact will be not effective and cannot be associated with EEA and more so in the background environment of a night sector.</p><p>One also looks for lower atmospheric perturbations trigged by seismic generated waves as another source in modulating density of ionosphere. The wavelike structures are generated in EQ environment due to modifications in atmospheric parameters like temperature, pressure, humidity. Because, the increase in temperature by the earthquake preparatory processes could develop a differential temperature situation in the steady nocturnal atmosphere thereby sharpening the density gradient or wind shear. In situations when earth’s gravity and the magnitude of stabilizing restoring force introduced by the density gradient are comparable, special structures or waves known as gravity waves are generated. They are quasi longitudinal waves and in presence of strong wind shear these waves break leading to Kelvin Helmholtz instability to generate wave structures. Development of such waves prior to one of the low altitude EQs was also seen by GU Sodar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref35">35</xref>], as ramp type structures considered as manifestation of gravity waves [36,37]. Association of seismic triggered waves with modification in ionospheric electron density prior to an earthquake was also presented by a number of workers [38-41]. Hegai et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref40">40</xref>] have computed possible effects of internal gravity waves in nighttime F layer density prior to a strong earthquake, considering origin of the waves with Joule heating due to the seismogenic electric field. They have shown that modification in ionisation density associated with wavelike character depends on the time of arrival of gravity waves at a distance r = 1000 km from the epicentre of an impending earthquake. Klomnikoto et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref41">41</xref>] have presented through model computation the possibility in modulation of electron density by EQ generated gravity waves that could lead to redistribution of electron density from the epicenter zone to equatorial region, a result relevant to our observation. However, to support this mode of transportation of density no such wave signature could be seen in TEC or ionisation density in the data sets of the two case studies we have taken up here.</p><p>It is also important to consider the EQ time radon emission from lithosphere near to the epicentre that may trigger ionization in the atmosphere. The seismic fault zone being in severe stressed condition prior to a major EQ, may release radon gas. In ionosphere, the radon gas not only enhances the electron density, but could modulate the atmospheric electric field, leading to ionospheric perturbation [42,43]. In such situation the component of electric current caused by the Lithospher-AtmosphereIonosphere (LAI) coupling as has been suggested by Freund [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref43">43</xref>] and Sorokin et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref44">44</xref>] may also be considered, where the group proposed that enhancement of &#160;density is due to increase in DC electric field up to 10 mV/m in the ionosphere, thereby generating electric current into the atmosphere-ionosphere circuit. The current they said acts as source of an electromotive force in the ground-air layer through injection of charged aerosols with soil gases in the atmosphere during seismic activity period.</p><p>Finally out of all these possible sources we have zeroed down to two main factors in transporting charged particles for development of the EEA zone. One of the factors is the earthquake time downward ExB drift generated by westward electric field that leads to modification in nighttime increase in NmF2/TEC at the equator. Thus, E-H coupling mode in case of the two severe EQ events one in Japan ( lies in fault line, as marked in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2), and the other in Indonesia (arrow head in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2) could enhance TEC strength at locations as shown by the global TEC map. It is interesting to note that TEC values observed at Guwahati, a location touched by the fault line also recorded high density [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36350-ref45">45</xref>], prior to the JEQs. The coupling processes between mid and equatorial regions may thus develop before a strong EQ, the sig-</p><p>nature of which could be seen as an anomaly at near equatorial region in the epicentre longitude zone. This process of accumulation of ionisation density at the 100˚E - 120˚E longitudes is further enhanced by EM focusing effect generated at the EEA location due to the presence of the distortion of earth magnetic field in this sector. The focusing effect in this case can be explained through the simple theory that if the magnetic field converges towards a small region in an otherwise uniform magnetic field over an area, the flux density within the convergence zone would bring the electron current to a focus. The curve in the earth magnetic field (more so in the near horizontal component) at around110˚E and 15˚N, acts like a cone where charged particles if enter magnetic lines, may get trapped and thereby show increase in its density. Before the strong EQ cases as taken up here, the electrons with charge e moving downwards along the magnetic field line by EQ induced electric filed (as discussed above ) with drift velocity v that experience a force of magnitude e (v &#215; B), resulting to a Hall force of H<sub>f</sub> = −(v &#215; B). Therefore, with the increase of Hall force, the density increases thereby strengthening the accumulation process of electrons by EQ preparatory processes at the apex of cone zone, in our case at 100˚E longitude and 15˚N latitude. Increase of drift value i.e. of Hall force with magnitude of EQ is the result of spreading of observation of TEC/foF2 far beyond epicentre zone (20, 27, 46, and 47). Here in this paper we consider that this process to be active during the EQ time along with the others and present that the magnetic distortion at special zone may lead to density modulation thereby acting as an identification signature of an EQ event.</p><p>As a possible aspect of the future study, we would use the results of this analysis as a basis for constructing quantitative models of the growth and inhibition of equatorial anomaly, to obtain a more reliable and accurate estimations of the EQ in connection with the observable quantities and their relationships.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the data support and suggestions received from the Australian meteorological department. The NmF2 data received from Ko-Ichiro Oyama, Institute of Space Science, National Central University, Taiyuan 32001, Taiwan are duly acknowledged.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.36350-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G K. Davies and D. M. Baker, “Ionospheric Effects Observed Round the Time of Alaska Earthquake of March 28, 1964,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 70, No. 9, 1965, pp. 22512263. doi:10.1029/JZ070i009p02251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Calais and J. B. Minster, “GPS Detection of Ionospheric Perturbations Following the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 22, No. 9, 1995, pp. 1045-1048. 
doi:10.1029/95GL00168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Hayakawa, O. A. Molchanov, T. Ondoh and E. Kawai, “The Precursory Signature Effect of the Kobe Earthquake on VLF Sub Ionospheric Signals,” Journal of Communications Research Laboratory Tokyo, Vol. 43, 1996, pp. 169-180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Hayakawa, “Atmospheric and Ionospheric Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes,” Terra Scientific Publishing Co, Tokyo, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. N. Oraevsky, Y. Y. Ruzhin and I. I. Shagimuratove, “Anomalies of Ionospheric TEC above Turkey before Two Strong Earthquakes,” Proceedings of 15th Wroclaw EMC Symposium, Brugge, 11-15 September 2000, pp. 508-512.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, M. K. Barman A. K. Barbara and A. H. Depueva, “Total Electron Content near Anomaly Crest as Precursor of Earthquake,” India Journal of Radio &amp; Space Physics, Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 209-213.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Y. Liu, Y. I. Chen, Y. J. Chou and H. F. Tsai, “Variations of Ionospheric Total Electron Content during the Chi-Chi Earthquake,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2001, pp. 1383-1386.  
doi:10.1029/2000GL012511</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. O. Walker and H. F. Chen, “Computer Simulation of the Seasonal Variations of Ionospheric Equatorial Anomaly in East Asia under Solar Minimum Conditions,” Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 51, No. 11-12, 1989, pp. 953-974.  
doi:10.1016/0021-9169(89)90011-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. O. Walker, J. H. K. Ma and E. Golton, “The Equatorial Ionospheric Anomaly in the Electron Content from Solar Minimum to Solar Maximum for the South East Asia,” Annals of Geophysics, Vol. 12, No. 2-3, 1994, p. 195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. Horvath and E. A. Essex, “Vertical E × B Drift Velocity Variations and Associated Low-Latitude Ionospheric Irregularities Investigated with the TOPEX and GPS Satellite Data,” Annals of Geophysics, European Geosciences Union, Vol. 21, 2003, pp. 1017-1030. 
doi:10.5194/angeo-21-1017-2003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Anderson, A. Anghel, J. L. Chau and K. Yumoto, “Global Low-Latitude, Vertical E × B Drift Velocities Inferred from Daytime Magnetometer Observations,” Space Weather, Vol. 4, No. 8, 2006.  
doi:10.1029/2005SW000193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. H. Depueva and Yu. Ya. Ruzhin, “Seismoionospheric Fountain Effect as Analogue of Active Space Experiment,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 15, No. 12, 1995, pp. 12-15. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(95)00036-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Y. Liu, Y. J. Chino, S. A. Pulinets, H. F. Tsai and X. Zeng, “A Study on the TEC Perturbation Prior to the Rei-Li Chi-Chi and Chi-Yi Earthquake,” Seismo Electromagnetics: Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, TER RAPUB, Tokyo, 2002, pp. 293-300.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara, A. H. Depueva and V. Depueva, “Preliminary Results of TEC Measurements in Guwahati, India,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, pp. 753-756. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2008.01.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Fukushima, “Contribution to Geomagnetic Sq Field and Equatorial Electrojet from the Day/Night Asymmetry of Ionospheric Current under dawn-Dusk Electric Fields of Magnetospheric Origin,” Pure and Applied Geophysics PAGEOPH, Vol. 131, 1989, pp. 437-446. 
doi:10.1007/BF00876838</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. I. Min-Yun and C.-S. Shen, “The Equatorial Electrojet and the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling-I. Analysis of Low-Latitude Geomagnetic Data,” Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1991, pp. 907-917. 
doi:10.1016/0032-0633(91)90095-R</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. C. Yeh, S. J. Franke, E. S. Andreeva and V. E. Kunitsyn, “An Investigation of Motions of the Equatorial Anomaly Crest,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 28, No. 24, 2001, pp. 4517-4520. doi:10.1029/2001GL013897</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, M. K. Barman and A. K. Barbara, “Identification of Quiet and Disturbed Days through TEC Profile Features over Anomaly Crest Station,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 64, No. 12-14, 2002, pp. 1413-1423.  
doi:10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00105-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara and A. H. Depueva, “Association of Total Electron Content and foF2 Variations with Earthquake Events at the Anomaly Crest Region,” Annals of Geophysics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2004, pp. 83-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Depueva, A. Mikhailov, M. Devi and A. K. Barbara, “Spatial and Time Variations in Critical Frequencies of the Ionospheric F Region above the Zone of Equatorial Earthquake Preparation,” Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, Vol. 47, 2007, pp. 129-133. 
doi:10.1134/S0016793207010197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. J. D. Sarma, S. Kalita, A. K. Barbara and A. Depueva, “Adoptive Techniques on Extraction of PreSeismic Parameters on Total Electron Content (TEC) at Anomaly Crest Stations Using GPS Data,” Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2011, pp. 193206. doi:10.1080/19475705.2011.595831</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi and A. K. Barbara, “On beyond the Horizon Propagation of VHF Signals,” ISEA-7, Hong Kong, 1984, pp. 6-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Hayakawa and O. A. Molchanov, “Seismo Electromagnetics, Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling,” Terra Scientific Publishing Co, Tokyo, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara, Yu. Ya. Ruzhin and A. H. Depueva, “Beyond the Horizon Propagation of VHF Signals, Atmospheric Features and Earthquake,” Electronic Journal, Investigated in Russia, Vol. 39, 2007, pp. 1331-1340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara, A. H. Depueva, Yu. Ya. Ruzhin, and V. Depueva, “Anomalous Total Electron Content (TEC) and Atmospheric Refractivity Prior to Very Strong China Earthquake of May 2008,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 31, No. 13, 2010, pp. 3589-3599.  
doi:10.1080/01431161003727663</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara, Ya. Yu. Ruzhin and M. Hayakawa, “Over-the-Horizon Anomalous VHF Propagation and Earthquake Precursors,” Surveys in Geophysics, Springer Publication, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1081-1106. 
doi:10.1007/s10712-012-9185-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. H. Depueva and N. M. Rotanova, “Low-Latitude Ionospheric Disturbances Associated with Earthquakes,” Annals of Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2001, pp. 221-228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara, P. Kashyap, A. Depueva, Ya. Yu. Ruzhin and V. Depueva, “Earthquake Time Low Latitude TEC and Model Estimated Values: Identification on Earthquake Induced Atmospheric Dynamics,” Advances of Geosciences, Vol. 26, 2010, pp. 69-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. G. Park, “Westward Electric Fields as the Cause of Nighttime Enhancements in Electron Concentrations in Mid Latitude F-Region,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 76, No. 19, 1971, pp. 4560-4568.  
doi:10.1029/JA076i019p04560</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Balan and G. J. Bailey, “Equatorial Plasma Fountain and Its Effects: Possibility of an Additional Layer,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 100, No. A11, 1995, pp. 21421- 21432.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. C. N. Rao, “The Post Sunset Rise in foF2 in the Transition Region and Its Dependence on the Post Sunset Rise in h’F in the Equatorial Region,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 68, No. 9, 1963, pp. 2551-2557.  
doi:10.1029/JZ068i009p02551</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. P. Kane, “Geomagnetic Field Variations,” Space Science Reviews, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1976, p. 413.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Mavlean, S. Macmillan, S. Mavs, V. Lesur, A. Thomson and D. Dater, “US-UK World Magnetic Model for 2005-2019,” NOAA, Technical Report NESDIS/NGDC-1, 2004, p. 54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. A. Molchanov and M. Hayakawa, “Seismo-Electromagnetics and Related Phenomena: History and Latest Results,” TERRAPUB, Tokyo, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi, A. K. Barbara and M. K. Barman, “Heat Exchange between Adiabatically Transported Air Parcels and the ABL,” Indian Journal of Physics, Vol. 743, No. 3, 2000, pp. 345-347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Naithani and H. N. Dutta, “Atmospherric Boundary Layer Studies over the Indian Antarctic Station Maitri,” Report, Radio Science Division, National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Report of Kyoto University Radio Science Centre for Space and Atmosphere, 2001, p. 19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. A. Molchanov, M. Hayakawa and K. Miyaki, “VLF/ LF Sounding of the Lower Ionosphere to Study the Role of Atmospheric Oscillations in the Lithosphere-Ionosphere Coupling,” Advances in Polar Upper Atmosphere Research, No. 15, 2001, pp. 146-158.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. V. Shvets, M. Hayakawa and O. A. Molchanov, “Subionospheric VLF Monitoring for Earthquake Related Ionospheric Perturbations,” Journal of Atmospheric Electricity, Vol. 22, 2002, pp. 87-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. V. Hegai, V. P. Kima and J. Y. Liu, “The Ionospheric Effect of Atmospheric Gravity Waves Excited Prior to Strong Earthquake,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2006, pp. 653-659.  
doi:10.1016/j.asr.2004.12.049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. V. Klimenko, V. V. Klimenko, I. V. Korpov and I. E. Zakharenkova, “Simulation of Seismo-Ionospheric Effects Initiated by Internal Gravity Waves,” Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2011, pp. 393-401. doi:10.1134/S1990793111030109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">S. Pulinets, “Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) Model,” In: M. Hayakawa, Ed., ElectroMagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes, Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, 2009, pp. 235-253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Freund, “Stress-Activated Positive Hole Charge Carriers in Rocks and the Generation of Pre-Earthquake Signals,” In: M. Hayakawa, Ed., Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes, Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, 2009, pp. 41-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. M. Sorokin, Y. Y. Ruzhin, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa, “Generation of VHF Radio Emissions by Electric Discharges in the Lower Atmosphere over a Seismic Region,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar- Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 73, No. 5-6, 2011, pp. 664-670. 
doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Devi and A. K. Barbara, “Total Electron Content and Anomalous Appearance of GPS Satellites as Pointers to Epicentre Identification of Major Japan Earthquake of 2011,” Positioning, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2012, pp. 7-12.  
http://www.SciRP.org/journal/pos</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Y. Liu, Y. I. Chen, C. H. Chen and K. Hattori, “Temporal and Spatial Precursors in the Ionospheric Global Positioning System (GPS) Total Electron Content Observed before the 26 December 2004 M9.3 Sumatra—Andaman Earthquake,” Journal of Geophysical 	Research, Vol. 115, No. A9, 2010. doi:10.1029/2010JA015313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36350-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Zhao, T. Yu, M. Wang, W. Wan, J. Lei, L. Liu and B. Ning, “Is an Unusual Large Enhancement of Ionospheric Electron Density Linked with the 2008 Great Wenchuan Earthquake? Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, No. A11, 2008. do</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>