<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.48A017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-36275</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Exact Scalar Field Inflationary Cosmological Model Which Solves Cosmological Constant Problem, Dark Matter Problem and Other Problems of Inflationary Cosmology
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ebasis</surname><given-names>Biswas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of physics (Formerly), Kalyani Mahavidalaya, Kalyani, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>biswasdebasis38@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>08</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>182</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>June</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   An exact scalar field cosmological model is constructed from the exact solution of the field equations. The solutions are exact and no approximation like slow roll is used. The model gives inflation, solves horizon and flatness problems. The model also gives a satisfactory estimate of present vacuum energy density as well as vacuum energy density at Planck epoch and solves cosmological constant problem of 120 orders of magnitude discrepancy of vacuum energy density. Further, this model predicts existence of dark matter/energy and gives an extremely accurate estimate of present energy density of dark matter and energy. Along with explanations of graceful exit, radiation era, matter domination, this model also indicates the reason for present accelerated state of the universe. In this work a method is shown following which one can construct an infinite number of exact scalar field inflationary cosmological models. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Inflationary Cosmology; Cosmological Constant; Dark Matter</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Inflation was proposed by Alan Guth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref1">1</xref>] although the idea of an exponential type expansion was due to Starobinsky and others [2-4]. The modern form of inflationary cosmology is due to A. Linde, A. Albrecht and P. Steinhardt [5,6]. In Guth’s original model the inflaton field <img src="17-7501387\447c6670-8919-4907-bdda-7f0d25f0dc88.jpg" /> was assumed to be trapped in a false vacuum and assumed a local value which is minimum. The inflaton field comes out from the local minimum value by quantum tunnelling and as universe inflates, tunnelling takes place. However, these ideas when pursued gave empty universe and therefore rejected. Guth further tried to improve the idea but they led to other difficulties.</p><p>Linde and Steinhardt proposed new inflationary model where the inflaton field varies slowly and undergoes a phase transition of second order. New inflationary models do not require the idea of tunnelling. Most of the modern models depend on the idea of chaotic inflation due to Linde. In these models the initial value of the inflaton field <img src="17-7501387\0d49dbfc-3e82-4985-b80a-792b3b869e24.jpg" /> is set chaotically when the universe exits from Planck era. The field then rolls downhill and if the potential is enough flat then inflation can take place.</p><p>There are another class of models known as hybrid inflationary models in which two fields are considered. These models introduce extra difficulties but they can speculate some features of single field models.</p><p>Inflationary cosmology is important because it offers solution to some great puzzles of cosmology. The puzzles are Flatness problem, Horizon problem and Monopole problem.</p><p>Flatness problem is basically why the density parameter <img src="17-7501387\b4d498c2-1f18-405c-b086-a596305ab0eb.jpg" /> is extremely close to unity i.e. why Ω ≈ 1? Horizon problem is why the universe is extremely smooth and isotropic on large scales? Monopole and the unwanted relics are the problems associated with standard hot Big Bang Theory. They are trivially solved when Flatness and Horizon problems are solved.</p><p>The above problems namely Flatness problem and Horizon problem are problems of Standard Big Bang theory are solved by assuming an accelerated expansion in early universe for a very short duration. This accelerated expansion is named as inflation. The starting time of inflation is model dependent. However, it occurred when the universe was extremely young. Inflation ended around the time when universe was 10<sup>‒33</sup> sec.old. From this time (10<sup>‒33</sup> sec.) radiation domination started. The phenomenon of ending inflation and then entering into radiation dominated era is known as graceful exit. And its mechanism requires explanations. An entirely different mechanism of graceful exit will be given in this work.</p><p>Lot of scalar field inflationary cosmological models have been proposed so far to explain the above scenarios. Expansion of universe is assumed to be driven by a scalar field <img src="17-7501387\863aa5f8-af75-48f0-8290-4f9c6a2c65ec.jpg" /> and an associated potential<img src="17-7501387\6dad4e7e-010d-4ffc-8bbf-8bd1874c104e.jpg" />. Many forms of potentials [7-11] have been used to solve the associated field equations.</p><p>In some models a kind of approximation is used to solve the difficult equations. This approximation is known as slow roll approximation which assumes that the field rolls very slowly. Mathematically this is equivalent to assuming <img src="17-7501387\b10facad-eea0-400a-acdf-b45d446b0c90.jpg" /> where the overhead dot represents derivative with respect to time. A few models find exact solutions to the field equations. All the above models explain the mechanism of inflation and solve Horizon and Flatness problems. Further it is found that solution of these problems are equivalent to produce an e-folding [defined as <img src="17-7501387\b7d94709-f444-46ff-bc36-8886f603cc28.jpg" /> during inflation] N ≥ 65 70 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref12">12</xref>]. Here <img src="17-7501387\2291ba74-b320-425b-b343-1c6925fc6ffc.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\af5ba1f2-a367-44d9-887c-a7a93389a147.jpg" /> are values of scale factor when inflation starts and ends respectively.</p><p>However these above models fail to explain cosmological constant problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref13">13</xref>] and dark matter problem. The cosmological constant problem is why the measured vacuum energy density is small by a factor of about <img src="17-7501387\4128fd3f-a64e-4086-afd3-937549c974ff.jpg" /> from its theoretical value. This is in language of Weinberg; “Worst failure of an order of magnitude estimate in the history of physics”.</p><p>The dark matter problem is another unsolved puzzle in modern cosmology. Our present knowledge asserts that the energy density of matter/energy content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref14">14</xref>] of our universe is: dark energy ~ 74%, dark matter ~ 22% and ordinary matter ~ 4%. No cosmological model predicts or accounts for this observation. There is also the problem of present acceleration [15-17] of the universe found from the observation of distant Supernovae Ia. The present work addresses all the above problems listed from the beginning and provides solutions in a single framework. Further, the solution of cosmological evolution equations are exact and no sort of approximations like slow roll approximation etc. is used to derive the solutions.</p><p>It may be mentioned here that slow roll is not the necessary and sufficient condition of inflation. However, if slow roll is valid, inflation takes place. It will be shown in this work that without slow roll one can have plenty of exact inflationary models.</p><p>Most vital idea in this work is the attribution of negative energy density to dark matter/energy constituents which is an alternative possibility permitted by the equation of state of dark matter/energy. It is shown that this idea fitted in an exact mathematical framework essentially solves all problems of standard cosmology.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Scalar Field Equation and Its Exact Solutions</title><p>We suppose that after tunnelling there exists a scalar field <img src="17-7501387\21d90efb-dd8a-456a-85ad-0d3452889d9d.jpg" /> and an associated potential<img src="17-7501387\90dbcf5d-a854-4581-a6eb-9af20cde8791.jpg" />, which is responsible for the evolution of the universe. It is further assumed that initially there existed some other type of fields <img src="17-7501387\3827623a-8469-4a8e-a444-cb19e5bf2d45.jpg" /> with potentials<img src="17-7501387\36eae1c0-10d8-4b7c-81ed-495a87646a52.jpg" />. But these fields were hanged up initially which means <img src="17-7501387\89d33234-c152-4a78-986d-ce359c58b676.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\a13ab074-3de5-486c-9c89-a1c3084a7b68.jpg" /> are negligible and they did not contribute to field equations initially. The number and nature of the <img src="17-7501387\9e55092f-c2c6-4b71-8b1d-8cdbf8a7f7f2.jpg" /> fields are not important for the purpose of cosmological predictions. The interactions of the scalar field <img src="17-7501387\4e932d6d-473d-4454-b531-27a187442b02.jpg" /> with other fields are assumed to be ignorable and consequently the<img src="17-7501387\c86974c6-823a-473a-ba64-f01b4db2c390.jpg" /> fields are assumed to interact among themselves only.</p><p>Now if the inflaton field <img src="17-7501387\6e7cd6dd-b6ef-4646-9caa-cf2bb5e30724.jpg" /> has no spatial variation and depends only on time then we can write the equations of motion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref18">18</xref>] of the scalar field and the Friedmann equation ignoring the curvature term as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44295"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\cd79ec61-9020-4bd3-a0ea-8cc42a515108.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44296"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\fe8199db-4c04-4f39-ba9a-ba33c2bf8b71.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44297"><label>(2a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\d521388a-af5c-4a7a-aa69-723f55b243cf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where a is the scale factor, <img src="17-7501387\ae0fc7ab-7b73-4c69-bb68-0418a97a498f.jpg" />is the inflaton field and <img src="17-7501387\1a170561-b4d6-45b4-9942-9ef84fc60665.jpg" /> is the potential. Overhead dot represents derivative with respect to time and overhead prime represents derivative w.r. to<img src="17-7501387\9a399401-e691-44fb-92ce-46c14ab16b20.jpg" />.</p><p>Equation (1) follows from the Lagrangian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref18">18</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44298"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\910d6e43-81e2-4409-bddb-a8ac24dfdc58.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Solution of Equations (1) and (2) are in some ways similar to the solution of Diophantine equations in Classical Algebra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref19">19</xref>], where the number of unknowns are more than the number of equations given.</p><p>Here a method will be shown by which one can find exact solution of Equations (1) and (2). In principle we will choose an arbitrary function from which we can construct some form of potentials for which Equations (1) and (2) are exactly solvable.</p><p>Following this method (Appendix A) one can find as many as exact solutions as one wishes. (In principle this method allows one to find an infinite number of exact solutions.)</p><p>Now following the method derived and illustrated in Appendix A, we write the solutions of (1) and (2).</p><p>They are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44299"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\560671ff-9044-4220-9b34-c7f55f8f8a8e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44300"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\eaf8fb24-f6e2-474c-bfd0-4b3598dfdff3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44301"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\f1e1ae8d-c711-43c6-a55c-f662bc10c62b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(The overhead dot represents time derivative.)</p><p>The functions <img src="17-7501387\3a1ed1c7-544b-4617-bc76-50627baa65e2.jpg" /> is arbitrary so that one can have an infinite number of choices of <img src="17-7501387\2f52f1e8-6d59-4e75-94e0-c4f4c846ebef.jpg" /> and can have an infinite number of exact solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Exact Scalar Field Model and Solution of Flatness and Horizon Problems</title><p>From the method illustrated in Appendix A, we can now find an exact inflationary model.</p><p>We choose the arbitrary function:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44302"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\1917fb6e-d660-42c1-a5df-196f32363bdd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The results are (Appendix A)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44303"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\b23f7763-8927-461f-b9ee-7e72ba94efc5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\6004ea35-b3ed-4813-9b64-1ad25f62c0f0.jpg" /> A and B are real arbitrary constants.</p><p>For <img src="17-7501387\b68a5e15-ca1c-4e3b-b2e4-6b06ec9544ae.jpg" /> (of course<img src="17-7501387\576360fc-2526-4a4f-8142-8b7e59716a13.jpg" />), and B &gt; 0, one can observe that &#228; &gt; 0 always. Therefore the above scale factor gives inflation. We will choose later on A such that</p><p><img src="17-7501387\b1e6d041-6491-476a-ace2-ab60956b21e2.jpg" /><img src="17-7501387\32ec751f-4588-40a4-88ff-5c704d3c429b.jpg" />and B &gt; 0.</p><p>The potential (Appendix A) which gives the above scale factor is in time-dependent form [A.29]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44304"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\9387d62c-436e-4de9-ad78-209adff503f8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And the same potential [A.34] in <img src="17-7501387\0aebc5a3-590d-49aa-99e3-c5b6824dc2b2.jpg" /> dependent form is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44305"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\7b32757a-7c68-428d-9024-379e1388931d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this model we choose the starting time of inflation as <img src="17-7501387\68b83cb4-ec48-49b4-aea6-0f1e59fd272b.jpg" /> i.e. just after tunneling and inflation ends at<img src="17-7501387\e3c7ef6a-3461-4fcd-aa5b-314a16428baf.jpg" />. Particle production in inflaltionary period is assumed to be negligible and ignored.</p><p>The mechanism of ending inflation will be discussed in next section.</p><p>Now from Equation (8) we can find the e-folding during inflation.</p><p><img src="17-7501387\a6a88727-f8ae-4c02-baf7-2f78a8746750.jpg" /></p><p>using (8)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44306"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\ca7eeed2-7ba7-4f56-8202-b770c3a3a17e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now we take</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44307"><label>(11a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\b4f6dcf2-92e5-4e73-9af9-e80778ddeaae.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(for inflation to take place <img src="17-7501387\88aa6f34-19d2-4580-b595-3f1c980961d3.jpg" /><img src="17-7501387\c77004b1-a7ac-4217-a60a-8d16cb5135d7.jpg" />and B &gt; 0)</p><p>And</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44308"><label>(11b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\3137b6fc-f45c-45ef-823e-7796d324fe86.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then using (11a) and (11b) we obtain from (11)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\706e2447-41ae-4bdd-b919-d9e70be72dc4.jpg" /></p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44309"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\1f25e33f-8b8a-45c6-8fce-d54f9b7466ec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For inflation to take place <img src="17-7501387\d766f2e2-d5c5-418c-b0e8-9911934c8968.jpg" /></p><p>If we choose A = 7.5 Then from (12) the result is, <img src="17-7501387\10cf1fed-cfcf-4aa9-9d92-1f0ed0f59159.jpg" /></p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44310"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\1bc76f97-ccdc-4c62-84ad-bcda68970b6b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore the e-folding one obtains is 70.5, which is perfectly satisfactory.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Graceful Exit and Starting of Radiation Era</title><p>It was assumed in previous section that inflation starts at <img src="17-7501387\b1bad1e6-7dd7-4d07-a003-dfc92406f0c4.jpg" /> and stops at<img src="17-7501387\9a5e193d-bfb3-4c75-b798-5f1785490d24.jpg" /> The mechanism by which inflation stops is like this. It was postulated in Section 2, that there were some hanged up fields for which <img src="17-7501387\7bd07c31-d043-45c6-be6c-4b2e33fbac0c.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\dc13cbe5-cf50-4dd7-b364-107ed4826b69.jpg" /> were negligible so that they did not contribute to the field equations. When inflation starts the inflaton field decays. During the period of inflation particle production due to decaying inflaton field is assumed to be negligible and not taken into account. But all of the hanged up fields interact among themselves and produce new particles with significant negative energy density around the time <img src="17-7501387\49ad1e6d-7264-4088-ad00-b3ce08f92476.jpg" /> The newly born fields created by these particles are denoted by<img src="17-7501387\98d9ff88-8a36-45e1-a65b-7f56b3f752bb.jpg" />. The effect of these negative energy density particles is to stop inflation at <img src="17-7501387\5b5ea9a0-65bc-43e5-9869-d737dba4af02.jpg" /> The mechanism of graceful exit will be more clear after the following discussions.</p><p>The equation of state of dark energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref12">12</xref>] is <img src="17-7501387\8d03a7d2-aeb3-4405-b17c-65344ca53f2b.jpg" /> where<img src="17-7501387\0d2f92f1-2e56-4bc1-aa6a-ba4faa97e2ab.jpg" />. For dark matter we assume the same equation of state as dark energy but a different negative value of <img src="17-7501387\2c6ed2ba-16d0-44e6-8d98-e49eee414791.jpg" /> Now since <img src="17-7501387\1a46951b-7b08-4edc-889f-c8788f2ffc6d.jpg" /> is negative, there exist two possibilities 1) P &gt; 0, <img src="17-7501387\f0c0391f-c468-4c61-966b-cb073992a770.jpg" />or 2) P &lt; 0,<img src="17-7501387\04b8cfc0-dbd7-4e8e-ae91-103cc393262a.jpg" />. Generally for dark energy the second possibility is accepted, although the first possibility i.e. for dark matter/energy P &gt; 0, <img src="17-7501387\a09eabed-46c5-4a75-8d81-1078f3f4428d.jpg" />is necessary for a graceful exit. Here we consider the first possibility i.e. we take P &gt; 0,<img src="17-7501387\97547753-5c27-481c-a937-03dd76cf9e9a.jpg" />. The Justification of this requirement can be explained in the following manner.</p><p>High energy physics assert that many forms of exotic particles form around the time<img src="17-7501387\75507697-ad60-4c35-8256-8c034e7ad76e.jpg" />. The exotic particles will be identified as dark matter/energy later on. The natures of the particles depend on the theory concerned and their natures are not very important for our purpose. We take it for granted that many forms of exotic particles were formed around the time <img src="17-7501387\7a9c1244-9f85-4e81-b0b7-41e4f071ad08.jpg" /> from the interaction of the hanged up fields whose existence were postulated earlier. In analogy with dark energy equations of state we take the equation of state of these particles as <img src="17-7501387\ac611b09-5296-41f8-9327-50977b100076.jpg" /> with <img src="17-7501387\378f9af2-3fd0-4f59-a163-47f5e282aea2.jpg" /> negative. However, we take the first possibility discussed before i.e. we take <img src="17-7501387\f5834c39-3d35-4022-b231-8371a65e4ab6.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\e17d6f9e-061f-402a-823c-dfa6393c2a7b.jpg" /> for these exotic particles. And appearance of a large negative energy density field helps to stop inflation at<img src="17-7501387\543d66fb-c91d-4c57-9967-acbc7eb9a6d7.jpg" />. Because creation of a large number of exotic particles with properties P &gt; 0 and <img src="17-7501387\f1662851-e9e1-4a16-97e9-7128b77be83d.jpg" /> will certainly decrease the energy density and create a situation for which an overall condition <img src="17-7501387\49648946-0a15-4455-bf89-c00ddba54b87.jpg" />would appear if we take <img src="17-7501387\4dbffada-c03d-4c44-ac71-35b812d006c9.jpg" /> for these particles, as it turns out that <img src="17-7501387\589a8b00-a29b-4e7b-a654-578440f412b7.jpg" /> for these large number of exotic particles. As a result inflation must stop. The appearance of an overall condition <img src="17-7501387\0dc6b921-aef3-4b37-ae64-336f82cbf9e2.jpg" /> guarantees creation of a retarded phase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>The assumption of negative energy density particles is perfectly consistent with the Null energy condition and Strong energy condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>The appearance of new negative energy density due to creation of new particles does not alter Equation (1) though they contribute to the Lagrangian from this time<img src="17-7501387\70717298-f347-488b-8b1c-c6035941ea02.jpg" />. The reasons are, the inflaton field <img src="17-7501387\7b2fe721-83a9-43d5-a301-d1a26b7462a3.jpg" /> has no appreciable interactions with the <img src="17-7501387\22631dbd-f9f3-4544-b37e-2256145b0897.jpg" /> fields or with the newly born <img src="17-7501387\397dfa72-6f6b-4cc2-ab44-51c7819ad704.jpg" /> fields at the time of graceful exit.</p><p>But the Friedmann equation assumes a new form from the time of graceful exit. Considering the appearance of negative energy density particles we find that Friedmann equation (i.e. Equation (2a)) assumes its new form at the time of graceful exit:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44311"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\af31c5f1-4f53-4101-8181-b3891d4c0911.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="17-7501387\fffa1b27-392e-4c78-afcb-0037a84886b8.jpg" />.</p><p><img src="17-7501387\60a31084-5031-4a78-ae5b-cb46f61db8e1.jpg" />represent potential energy corresponding to <img src="17-7501387\56b71028-4161-4c24-9f6d-20aa9aa128e2.jpg" /> fields.</p><p>We neglect further variations of <img src="17-7501387\67cf77ad-104b-4d8a-8297-db42f59a11d2.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\b87157af-84a4-4db7-afe8-4dd35a72202d.jpg" /> and they do not interact further among themselves.</p><p>Here <img src="17-7501387\0864f544-033d-4c3b-abb1-3d91340acccc.jpg" /> is the energy density of the new exotic particles formed. The negative sign before <img src="17-7501387\8ceb16e9-074e-4aca-b214-995b653a160f.jpg" /> in (14) indicates that the energy densities of the exotic particles are negative.</p><p>At the time of graceful exit the universe enters into a decelerated phase. It is well-known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref18">18</xref>] that the conditions of accelerated phase is <img src="17-7501387\c77229c9-f152-4230-977e-49b700997fd6.jpg" /> and that of decelerated phase is<img src="17-7501387\47fb4ac6-3b24-4e64-b85e-603b297fc1e0.jpg" />. We can therefore assume that the creation of new energy density due to newly born particles create an overall situation where an overall condition like <img src="17-7501387\322e98e7-eb4d-4053-a713-449d3764517d.jpg" /> holds from the time of graceful exit.</p><p>The foregoing discussions illustrate the mechanism of graceful exit. An accelerated expansion reduces to a time half power law at the time of graceful exit i.e. at<img src="17-7501387\b8776cf7-5579-4417-b970-e9bf29919948.jpg" />. So from this time radiation era starts. We can exactly calculate value of <img src="17-7501387\3e028ce2-24d0-461d-8bf1-e08a95bda87b.jpg" /> at the time of graceful exit using (A.29a) and (A.30) and taking<img src="17-7501387\7ed76ff2-ac71-469e-ab3e-4a007a742f18.jpg" />. This is, however unnecessary for our purpose.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Cosmological Constant and Dark Matter/Energy Problem</title><p>After graceful exit the expansion of universe continues and the inflaton field <img src="17-7501387\bdde87ae-f59d-461f-8ee4-1c045f6be26b.jpg" /> goes on decaying. We assume that particles are produced in this phase with properties<img src="17-7501387\d90111e7-89c7-46cd-8577-e6ebad5a8c31.jpg" />, <img src="17-7501387\9c82ed8b-8388-474f-ab06-73cf801aaeb0.jpg" />as well as <img src="17-7501387\5f85ec70-a931-47c1-a776-66dd4abfed46.jpg" /> <img src="17-7501387\23eb076b-123d-41f6-96d9-de244402debb.jpg" />. For the second type of particles if we assume an equation of state <img src="17-7501387\450f351c-6880-4e74-9d55-61e2a737974e.jpg" />with <img src="17-7501387\b901b44c-c848-412a-90b5-72abac33a220.jpg" /> then <img src="17-7501387\9d18d10d-45e5-4e3f-8d5e-a7dbdee48f41.jpg" /> for these particles. All energy conditions permit this [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref13">13</xref>]. We take it for granted that these type of particles are produced more than the first type in matter dominated phase. Now<img src="17-7501387\383e0341-5a0a-4a58-88f5-6b44ae9d4e11.jpg" />, since <img src="17-7501387\2ffabc9e-ad40-47f5-8a2c-b86657a1da07.jpg" /> for both type of particles. The overall effect is the appearance of a positive energy density denoted by<img src="17-7501387\30888d18-abbb-44f2-89cd-70536cc9ad14.jpg" />. Thus total energy density of all created particles after graceful exit upto present moment is represented by<img src="17-7501387\09d67198-7ab1-4c70-ad45-b60f359508c8.jpg" />.</p><p>With this idea we can now write the Friedmann equation at present epoch:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44312"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\c8eee553-64cf-47fd-80b6-67eaef805c8d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (15) follows from (14) by introducing the term <img src="17-7501387\ee0270fa-cb9d-469e-ae21-be74716e218d.jpg" /> in R.H.S of (14)</p><p>Here <img src="17-7501387\a9380b25-d556-418f-a3b5-06d425381a49.jpg" /> is the energy density of the inflaton field.</p><p>i.e. <img src="17-7501387\c3754253-e766-4b9d-9da7-3abb1ac8b59f.jpg" /></p><p>And <img src="17-7501387\88c0828b-8381-46e3-aa87-12957468de40.jpg" /> = energy density of the created particles after graceful exit upto present epoch.</p><p>And <img src="17-7501387\b804a535-ce90-42c2-9e90-86b416e21e23.jpg" /> = energy density of exotic particles created just before the time of graceful exit.</p><p>It is difficult to calculate <img src="17-7501387\4ab1167b-909f-48e5-9304-e3a9f93c0284.jpg" /> but one can safely assume that <img src="17-7501387\f6a22d84-53f1-421a-b9ab-ef34ef3c971c.jpg" /> is much less than <img src="17-7501387\d4a0a362-c7ee-410f-9c7c-1cf3771f2985.jpg" /> so that we can write:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44313"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\f4f06820-ebdc-4e51-a6fd-abac0a470d99.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then Equation (15) can be recasted as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44314"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\84b0924f-b12d-48f3-9460-9cf89fcbf414.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\2df5dfce-a6ca-4462-b95d-ad228d819f85.jpg" /> is the present Value of Hubble constant.</p><p>Using the present value of <img src="17-7501387\23d3d2f0-2d91-41ca-9cdf-b162caf0f625.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref18">18</xref>] as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44315"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\8644b92a-a865-4770-a522-48c3a2222722.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We find from (17) the present value of <img src="17-7501387\d240e47d-c934-4d97-94b5-e8c79b7da9ad.jpg" /> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44316"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\349d1ca3-a26f-4aa0-8d41-1ee311c4b4aa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now we define cosmological constant as the energy density of the inflaton field (i.e.<img src="17-7501387\febd6497-7aaf-4f2f-a45d-106971845acb.jpg" />) as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44317"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\0f5a9bba-d96b-4d5a-b7e8-dd7b2f79fcc9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (A.29a) and (A.29) we write</p><p><img src="17-7501387\e56a00c8-55ce-4604-b619-d8311dcb90b1.jpg" /></p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44318"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\54839bae-cefe-47b6-ac65-b9eb1eb7d621.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now taking A = 7.5 and <img src="17-7501387\c10413f1-272f-4b5c-9897-522e8a4e1cc7.jpg" /> as earlier, we find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44319"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\ffdce083-4561-438a-bb1d-d3498b5f93d1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then from (22) at <img src="17-7501387\e3626c52-4e5e-477e-9537-b6f1350b9896.jpg" /> i.e. at Planck epoch,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44320"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\1b47bff5-5e79-45b1-bc36-e24e9576e9a3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And at present i.e. at <img src="17-7501387\9e4c5a89-7cbb-4ff4-9895-08387855676e.jpg" /><sub></sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44321"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\16035b62-649b-4d8e-bc46-b93cec19bc73.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then using (23) and (24)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44322"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\b9fbf8c7-8ac7-40a1-95ec-d87b0d41dc59.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (24) gives the present value of cosmological constant and Equation (25) exactly accounts for the so called discrepancy of 120 orders of magnitude of the value of cosmological constant.</p><p>Since L.H.S. of (17) represents effective vacuum energy density at present, so more precise present value of cosmological constant is given by (19) and equals<img src="17-7501387\619f311f-306d-4a39-9e27-ecf6efe28509.jpg" />. Then using this value we find from (23)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44323"><label>(25a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\e5d70342-4ca6-4ead-a409-29609d4a7e63.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (25a) gives more precise ratio of cosmological constant at Planck epoch and at present epoch.</p><p>The vacuum energy density at Planck epoch and its expected present value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref20">20</xref>] is</p><p><img src="17-7501387\f7dfd084-8f20-4c5c-b56c-0b53d1ff8c2d.jpg" />And</p><p><img src="17-7501387\a4a27ea1-872d-4d6d-bb5e-7ef41633d0fc.jpg" /></p><p>Converting these values in the unit <img src="17-7501387\e4f76927-be91-470c-984b-839506869ca6.jpg" /> one finds</p><p><img src="17-7501387\a499fd40-08bb-43a2-9b1e-db387439bd6c.jpg" />And</p><p><img src="17-7501387\26a0a8b3-d4c4-4d79-aecb-5732e97638af.jpg" /></p><p>Thus the results obtained above (Equations (19) and (23)) based on the exact model is quite satisfactory.</p><p>Now we identify <img src="17-7501387\2880c88c-8f14-47dd-80df-e4d46ed28575.jpg" /> defined by Equation (16) is the energy density of dark matter/energy and calculate its present value. The negative sign before <img src="17-7501387\93c86a86-f6f5-40fe-95f7-a22aafe99690.jpg" /> in (16) indicates that energy density of dark matter/energy is negative.</p><p>Using (19) and (24) we find the present value of energy density of dark matter/energy as</p><p><img src="17-7501387\551ada14-436a-475e-aef0-39ff6a32f172.jpg" /></p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44324"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\123ca651-ed1e-4ddb-85d1-dc72aba2120a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now using (24) and (26) the present ratio of <img src="17-7501387\c7a8c333-fa3a-42ba-bad0-e567f875b7f1.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\f824c4ab-7b07-4da6-af6f-934a6b6a03ea.jpg" /> is obtained as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44325"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\58e3b01a-5655-4c2c-81ec-da12f62d2b57.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In view of Equation (27) we can safely conclude that 95.78% energy density of the inflaton field is diminished by the presence of negative energy density of dark matter/energy and the rest 4.22% represent ordinary matter energy, since for ordinary matter/energy <img src="17-7501387\6629fed2-577b-4ab7-b155-9921314a4158.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref12">12</xref>]. Thus the present energy density budget of the universe finds its correct accounting, 95.78% corresponds to dark matter and energy and 4.22% corresponds to ordinary matter and energy. However there is a basic difference in the nature of the above energy densities. The energy density of inflaton i.e. vacuum energy density is positive, while the energy density of dark matter/energy is negative. The present energy density of ordinary matter-energy equals present vacuum energy density less the magnitude of present energy density of dark matter/energy. And as energy density of exotic particles were taken negative, it turns out that constituents of dark matter/ energy are exotic particles as energy density of dark matter/energy is also negative.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Matter Domination and Present Accelerated State of the Universe</title><p>It was explained in previous sections that the mechanism of graceful exit is due to formation of some kinds of particles due to interaction of the hanged up fields between themselves.</p><p>Now during the course of evolution, after graceful exit the energy density slowly increases due to further formation of new particles. Unlike exotic particles energy density, these particles have positive energy densities. So that they add up with inflaton energy density<img src="17-7501387\ca54a394-e635-46cf-a86b-8295233dcee9.jpg" />. Cooling also increases of the energy density of the universe. And due to this overall increase of energy density, the universe gradually enters into matter dominated phase, when formation of matter takes place.</p><p>Present accelerated phase is due to further continuation of above features, i.e. formation of more and more positive energy density particles together with cooling etc. It was assumed in Section 5 that particles produced after graceful exit has the property <img src="17-7501387\20ba740f-78f5-448f-b0a0-1fcdad118749.jpg" /> and in matter dominated phase more particles are produced with property<img src="17-7501387\9a673c08-4153-4e71-b9e5-797d31deb4fe.jpg" />, P &lt; 0 than particles with property<img src="17-7501387\f2203fc4-e857-4cfe-b76b-66ad6fa79099.jpg" />,<img src="17-7501387\89ecea12-d911-45b5-b43d-ee3a5684ece4.jpg" />. The equation of state of the particles with property<img src="17-7501387\400113d9-c486-405c-915a-e3a4d74d6862.jpg" />, P &lt; 0 is such that<img src="17-7501387\9e1f5592-d1ce-42e0-b78a-c92277b003f4.jpg" />. Particles with<img src="17-7501387\5bf6b74b-1dfc-42b3-a563-480cff9cee9c.jpg" />, <img src="17-7501387\48857571-0a9b-4b38-82f2-f120f677d826.jpg" />are ordinary matter/radiation, whereas particles with<img src="17-7501387\4bab187d-63ef-43c1-88cf-30428ff4bfc5.jpg" />, P &lt; 0 along with <img src="17-7501387\d4ffe85a-5caa-41b4-be6a-cc1d4cd8f444.jpg" /> probably represent unstable particles which have vacuum like properties. Now in matter dominated phase as more and more particles are produced with property<img src="17-7501387\7436336b-91be-4000-8d83-5d3c45c285d7.jpg" />, P &lt; 0, <img src="17-7501387\f4163fce-76a6-41df-83cd-834d811276c7.jpg" />, a situation is gradually reached for which<img src="17-7501387\3ee0d15b-8354-4ad4-8ea0-b0773db13aca.jpg" />. And acceleration of the universe starts right from the moment when <img src="17-7501387\ad52ca76-8d0d-4002-857b-a1616ebd0d78.jpg" /> becomes negative. Such a situation still continues for which we observe our universe accelerating presently. It is once again mentioned that particles produced in various phases after graceful exit has properties<img src="17-7501387\314d6880-5375-4ead-b746-c1dd23af553f.jpg" />, P &lt; 0 as well as<img src="17-7501387\36cd5e03-48c9-4afb-91a2-dcb9cdb95cb9.jpg" />, <img src="17-7501387\3fbe29df-b06f-458c-9944-e82873cfa363.jpg" />, whereas for exotic particles which were formed just before graceful exit<img src="17-7501387\c3af79df-de0b-49ac-86c1-fbe4d83ba536.jpg" />, P &gt; 0.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Summary and Concluding Remarks</title><p>A variety of cosmological models were proposed in last three decades to solve the major problems of cosmology. Among these are the Coleman-Weinberg SU (5) model, models by Pi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref20">20</xref>] and Shafi and Vilenkin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref21">21</xref>] and many other models. All the above models were either a failure or partially successful to explain few features only. And all models so far proposed failed to explain the mysterious cosmological constant problem. No model has yet predicted the existence of dark matter and energy.</p><p>The present work solves the mysterious cosmological constant problem i.e. the discrepancy of 120 or more precisely 122 orders of the measured value of cosmological constant and predicts the existence of dark matter and energy. The work removes the ambiguity of definition of cosmological constant by clearly defining it as scalar field energy density or vacuum energy density and not the energy density of dark matter/energy. Further, this model gives extremely accurate estimate of present values of vacuum energy density and energy density of dark matter/energy. It also solves flatness and horizon problem, gives a satisfactory estimate of e-folding which is necessary to solve horizon and flatness problems and of course trivially monopole problem. Lastly this work also supplies the explanation for the present state of acceleration of the universe.</p><p>This work although explains the major problems of present day cosmology, it is not clear whether this exact model will be able to explain far late behavior of our universe. And certainly it is not capable to predict any new cosmological phenomena which may occur in future.</p><p>The above work is a revised version of a work by this author [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36275-ref22">22</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Appendix A</title><p>The Friedmann and Scalar Field equations are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44326"><label>(A.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\4db495c3-e004-47c9-a6ff-faba433ecdd6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44327"><label>(A.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\37a05ca2-e049-46e7-804c-72f39a3dd124.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the dots represent derivative with respect to time t and prime represents derivative with respect to<img src="17-7501387\49f0bdf0-10b7-4485-9341-1a25fa7bcd36.jpg" />.</p><p>From (A.1) one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44328"><label>(A.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\c391c7d1-2e76-44f9-8411-350bdf508a6e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (A.2) we have</p><p><img src="17-7501387\533bf855-65a6-4119-9581-65286e23e3da.jpg" /></p><p>using (A.3)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44329"><label>(A.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\7b5601eb-d96e-467b-813f-f21d54d13b5c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, squaring both sides of (A.4) one obtains:</p><p><img src="17-7501387\bc1e7002-87f4-4d90-8daf-1b719aafd7fc.jpg" /></p><p>After rearrangement, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44330"><label>(A.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\09cf9a2f-a35d-46ae-9af0-285a1cbe4247.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To solve (A.5) let us put</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44331"><label>(A.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\c7b9b936-238b-4260-9d46-6ff272638aca.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore</p><p><img src="17-7501387\dbad56c9-ab85-4c55-a641-9c61c81e5306.jpg" /></p><p>using (A.6)</p><p>So that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44332"><label>(A.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\0f286b4f-4bf1-4c0b-8ac6-c38531fe808e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then from (A.5), using (A.6) and (A.7) one finds</p><p><img src="17-7501387\2f457427-b60f-4963-9203-ba7608233445.jpg" /></p><p>Which simplifies to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44333"><label>(A.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\b1a0ddb2-d0f3-46a6-92a3-6046933c9082.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <img src="17-7501387\8385be4b-abbb-45eb-9ab2-7b45e104c060.jpg" /> and <img src="17-7501387\41d3e174-93ab-4c86-b6bc-414b0f96c44f.jpg" /></p><p>A solution of (A.8) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44334"><label>(A.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\09274192-86a2-4cfd-9f58-7b69b4b6564c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>One can check this by observing from (A.9) that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44335"><label>(A.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\59202fa1-211a-42b0-bc24-e16b729d7680.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When (A.9) and (A.10) is substituted in (A.8) the result is verified.</p><p>Therefore the conclusion is that <img src="17-7501387\0456a255-e1c7-4fa9-9409-42913c8fc104.jpg" /> is a solution of (A.8)</p><p>However the solution <img src="17-7501387\6b0ece71-bad2-41e2-95f5-ab913d5faee6.jpg" /> is rejected because when this solution is substituted in (A.3), we obtain a static universe, i.e. <img src="17-7501387\0fea3ca2-5388-4c55-a1f2-63cdfd0c30ba.jpg" />so that <img src="17-7501387\9369a998-9873-4114-ac67-2a0d1df11ab7.jpg" /> = constant.</p><p>So to obtain a sensible solution of (A.8) let us assume</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44336"><label>(A.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\307ad423-47b5-4584-abeb-d60d0c58e2cd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\6181835a-6d65-4616-907f-be7cc8d82447.jpg" /> is an arbitrary function of<img src="17-7501387\36d90f52-519b-4eda-9796-3bc85558ecfd.jpg" />.</p><p>Substituting (A.11) into (A.8) one gets</p><p><img src="17-7501387\c899de9a-037b-4b8e-9973-caa7b5a10bdf.jpg" /></p><p>Which after simplification yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44337"><label>(A.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\9a348d7a-052f-43c9-a6a1-c3f14eb40638.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (A.12) we find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44338"><label>(A.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\8ea186fc-f78e-4073-8994-f2b44826f9e8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence we conclude that (A.11) is the solution of (A.8) i.e. solutions of (A.1) and (A.2) if <img src="17-7501387\57c87a5b-1bdd-4b17-8c07-e6d04b2a7d3f.jpg" /> is given by (A.13).It is to be noted that (A.8) is the consequence of (A.1) and (A.2)</p><p>The function <img src="17-7501387\7149f903-0f9b-4b78-8dce-690a3525d202.jpg" /> is of course arbitrary.</p><p>Now we find from (A.3)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\67d36e8f-50e1-401c-8fcc-e91083895135.jpg" /></p><p>Using (A.6)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44339"><label>(A.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\2ae007e4-971e-4905-8e3f-f01cfde07617.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using (A.11)</p><p>Now we like to calculate the scalar field potential <img src="17-7501387\b0ddfebf-7a8e-40ea-9344-2292e4e6b6ac.jpg" /> in terms of time t.</p><p>To do this we write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44340"><label>(A.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\c64ea8bf-1130-4f4b-a8f5-276e053a4ba1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>since <img src="17-7501387\e853a83d-52df-4cf3-abb6-54bdd854157d.jpg" /> depends on t only And</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44341"><label>(A.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\ee255c6f-ae16-4cbd-a0cb-b299a3a3a352.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then (A.14) can be rewritten as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44342"><label>(A.16a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\bfb1fa99-9d3e-4812-bb2b-626c06a36577.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using (A.15)</p><p>Now from (A.15) we have</p><p><img src="17-7501387\8a9539ab-b781-4839-894e-f0ffdfdef9e2.jpg" /></p><p>using (A.15)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44343"><label>(A.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\27895400-197f-470d-9133-83c9bfc676db.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So that from (A.6) and (A.11) one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44344"><graphic  xlink:href="17-7501387\10c5129e-03c0-4b5e-a451-fcfe0da43852.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using (A.13)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44345"><label>(A.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\4a40aa53-ffd1-435c-abfd-a905100744ff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e.</p><p><img src="17-7501387\5a7f96ca-dd6b-4e56-abc8-191699fca62f.jpg" /></p><p>using (A.6), (A.17) &amp; (A.15)</p><p>Therefore <img src="17-7501387\aed3ecd0-d987-465b-b979-cd302d1f91d9.jpg" /></p><p>Hence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44346"><label>(A.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\84465f90-1f1b-4f86-86f2-db804ecb7233.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(Negative sign is considered for convenience.)</p><p>Next we find from (A.13) and (A.16)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\2b18b5b3-f046-4f6e-a6f9-cc7276a253e0.jpg" /></p><p><img src="17-7501387\ae116acc-d523-422a-82a5-71dad3c474b4.jpg" /></p><p>Using (A.15) &amp; (A.17)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\dc01873f-8185-4f24-a861-542bb9c14748.jpg" /></p><p><img src="17-7501387\0c623256-e234-4073-9719-0db8da48ae46.jpg" /></p><p>Using (A.19)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44347"><label>(A.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\57d3f265-b4a9-4f37-a2e7-0ecd0cbcc95b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The above calculations assure that the exact solution of (A.1) and (A.2) can be found from the following prescription:</p><p>Choose an arbitrary function<img src="17-7501387\dab23b10-210c-452b-9b81-9fcf53eff6a2.jpg" />. For this arbitrary function <img src="17-7501387\a523278f-8c6c-4f71-a2db-828b5f29e074.jpg" /> the exact solutions of (A.1) and (A.2) are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44348"><label>(A.21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\4b6b6df5-f39a-46bc-9c84-a2f97016ff1a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>One can check that (A.21) is the exact solution set of (A.1) and (A.2) in the following way:</p><p>From the last of (A.21) one gets</p><p><img src="17-7501387\d12c9f69-cc9f-4c34-9d24-5e221954b9c5.jpg" /></p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44349"><label>(A.22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\84f04bc0-55b2-4cdf-b67a-86071cf0834e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><p><img src="17-7501387\2438d52e-a7f0-4940-8a43-8a2c107d21c4.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44350"><graphic  xlink:href="17-7501387\54b7af35-7de7-4e20-ad48-92b097061df9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using (A.16)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\179a6c16-c416-4b21-8c25-b59743668080.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44351"><graphic  xlink:href="17-7501387\0cbb112e-b156-458f-8c76-71d73d4481f6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44352"><label>(A.23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\5bfc1d40-16aa-4bb8-a3b9-c1341b42376b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the 2nd of (A.21) one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44353"><label>(A.24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\88e37160-4cb2-4c7d-93f5-400ef080e033.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is now easy to verify from (A.23) that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44354"><graphic  xlink:href="17-7501387\ce3bbd82-d909-474d-934b-5a58084d8077.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using (A.22), (A.24) &amp; (A.21) and as <img src="17-7501387\fd54399f-bf04-4ad1-a49e-d1c2ef62a4ff.jpg" /> since <img src="17-7501387\415d4fe4-c4ab-4220-95fc-1513bacf47d3.jpg" /><sub> </sub>evolves continuously. Finally one can check in a straight forward way from (A.1) that</p><p><img src="17-7501387\91a745da-415d-49b1-ac66-60d028e0736f.jpg" /></p><p>Using (A.16)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\37041029-ed6d-46ea-a917-fb84a892876c.jpg" /></p><p>Using last of (A.21) and (A.20)</p><p><img src="17-7501387\330f33df-b06d-43fb-a4b6-95e222b1e151.jpg" /></p><p>i.e.<img src="17-7501387\98578b28-5b01-4320-bc86-908b4e391b49.jpg" />]</p><p>Now we will construct an exact inflationary model from the exact solutions obtained before.</p><p>Let us choose the arbitrary function <img src="17-7501387\93a563f7-8fd2-4327-b700-acf59d3aa396.jpg" /> as</p><p><img src="17-7501387\8a9f79db-a2c1-4629-81cd-1be42e438fbf.jpg" /> (A.25)Here A and B are real arbitrary constants i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44355"><label>(A.26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\fb8a758b-18b4-42d4-b1a6-1ea471bedf83.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(Taking positive sign of square root only).</p><p>It has to be remembered that <img src="17-7501387\cda624ff-09c0-4584-b7aa-4c06ad0803e8.jpg" /> is arbitrary.</p><p>Then from (A.14) and (A.15).</p><p><img src="17-7501387\0904c10a-c647-49b7-80e4-291fae2fc5d1.jpg" /></p><p>using (A.26)</p><p>Hence <img src="17-7501387\a1bda5e5-918e-4a34-93b3-46c80a53397d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="17-7501387\435a2f82-2743-4375-aff5-7c121760d875.jpg" />= Constant of integration i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44356"><label>(A.27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\6540903b-e9cd-4c93-a65d-99849d6d2860.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now one finds from (A.26)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44357"><label>(A.28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\4e6dcbcd-5561-477c-8aca-e977d434ec4b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (A.25) and (A.28) we find from</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44358"><label>(A.29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\ed72a607-c4f0-4fcc-94e8-724b66f7ee63.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (A.29) gives the time dependent form of the potential which gives the scale factor (A.27). Next we will find the scalar field <img src="17-7501387\a929180a-66ec-4df0-aee6-ee0f7643708f.jpg" /> dependence of the potential in the following way:</p><p>From the last of (A.21), we have</p><p><img src="17-7501387\c56c7371-c177-4e8e-83c1-4fa69b6d2eab.jpg" /></p><p>Using (A.28)</p><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44359"><label>(A.29a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\20bc51fc-b7a7-44af-8964-5e432434f003.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44360"><label>(A.30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\bade64c1-918d-4869-a67e-706e7abd9c2e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\048c1aa6-29e5-428e-98a2-463c7026d7e9.jpg" /> and negative sign is taken for convenience.</p><p>So that from (A.30) one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44361"><label>(A.31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\c523599f-1c8f-42cc-b900-0330634b8cea.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\76752691-eae7-4101-9746-a52a12addbe0.jpg" /> =constant of integration.</p><p>From (A.31) we find <img src="17-7501387\268df458-868c-468b-b733-a017518d326a.jpg" /></p><p>i.e. <img src="17-7501387\452219e3-361e-42d4-ab4f-2938d0c437b8.jpg" /></p><p>therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44362"><label>(A.32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\74bf12b8-9a49-4076-b1d7-81155c448242.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\9bdbcb24-f536-445b-b304-f98b2d0399c7.jpg" /></p><p>Now using (A.32), we find from (A.29)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44363"><label>(A.33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\229f9307-ac5c-4ae6-bb91-eaba088f1d29.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (A.33) gives the <img src="17-7501387\8c97b884-1f11-49de-aca2-b4340c4f1d43.jpg" /> dependence of the potential which in more compact form can be recasted as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.36275-formula44364"><label>(A.34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="17-7501387\c259156a-2fa5-4164-acf1-4a8bb3da07da.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="17-7501387\3941bda2-b3dd-44bd-b6af-9ecac40e689b.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="17-7501387\75a8d5f4-5a62-4e91-b477-f446874044f1.jpg" /></p><p>Thus it turns out that the potential given by (A.34) produces the scale factor given by (A.27). The potential given by (A.34) and (A.29) are the same potential in different forms.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.36275-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Guth, Physical Review D, Vol. 23, 1981, pp. 347-356. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Letters, Vol. 30, 1979, p. 682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Kazanas, The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 241, 1980, pp. L59-L63. doi:10.1086/183361</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Sato, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 195, 1981, p. 467.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Linde, Physics Letters B, Vol. 108, 1982, pp. 389-393. 
doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Albrecht and P. Steinhardt, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 48, p. 82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kamionkowski, 1998. astro-ph/9808004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Turner and L. Widrow, Physical Review D, Vol. 37, 1988, pp. 2743-2754. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. R. Liddle, 1999. astro-ph/9910110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. H. Lyth and E. D. Stewart, Physics Letters B, Vol. 274, 1992, pp. 168-172. 
doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90518-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Lucchin and S. Matarrese, Physical Review D, Vol. 32, 1985, pp. 1316-1322. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.1316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Weinberg, “Cosmology,” O.U.P., 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Carroll, “Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity,” Addision-Wesley, Boston, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Zee, “Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell,” 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Perlmutter, et al., The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 517, 1999, p. 565. doi:10.1086/307221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. G. Riess, et al., The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 116, 1998, p. 1009. doi:10.1086/300499</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Schimdt, et al., The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 507, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. P. Hobson, G. P. Efstathiou and A. N. Lasenby, “General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicist,” C.U.P., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. M. Burton, “Elementary Number Theory,” 6th Edition, Tata Mcgraw-Hill, Noida, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Y. Pi, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 52, 1984, pp. 1725-1728. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1725</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. Shafi and A. Vilenkin, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 52, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36275-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Debasis Biswas. arxiv.org&gt;physics&gt;arxiv:1112.3005</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>