<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2013.49A2002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-36136</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of Edible Micronized Chitosan Coating on Quality and Shelf Life of Sliced Papaya
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>o-Jung</surname><given-names>Chien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hung-Ren</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Min-Sheng</surname><given-names>Su</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Food Science, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Horticulture and Biotechnology, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>pojungchien@gmail.com(OC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>08</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>30th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>June</day>	<month>30th,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>7th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Papaya pulp is very perishable and has a short shelf life. Manually sliced papayas were treated with 0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% chitosan (non-micronized and micronized) aqueous solutions; placed into plastic trays, and over-wrapped with PVDC film and then stored at 4&#176;C. Color, soluble solid content, water loss, and total plate count of samples were evaluated. Chitosan coating had the ability to maintain the lightness of the sliced papayas. The a* values of the micronized chitosan-coated sliced papayas were significantly lower than those of the-coated. The sliced papayas that had been treated with 1% MC had a higher total soluble solid content and lower b* value after four days of storage. Also, the chitosan coating on the sliced papaya effectively retarded water loss and inhibited the growth of microorganisms. The results reveal that applying a chitosan coating effectively maintained the quality attributes and prolonged the shelf life of the sliced papayas. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Micronized Chitosan; Papaya; Minimal Processed Fruit; Quality; Shelf Life</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Papaya is a climacteric fruit. The climacteric respiration peak is observed at the 6th day after harvest when papaya is harvested at the color break stage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref1">1</xref>]. Normally, papaya fruit with at least 3% skin yellowing has 11.5% total soluble solids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref2">2</xref>] and the pulp firmness starts decreasing from approximately 240 to 50 N [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref3">3</xref>]. For convenience of serving and consumption, restaurants and consumers prefer to consume sliced papayas. Slicing and deseeding led to an increase in respiration, ethylene production, and flesh softening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref4">4</xref>]. Minimal processed papaya is very perishable and has a short shelf life due to the increased tissue disruption, ethylene production, respiration, and transpiration [5-7]. Typically, minimally processed foods are stored between 4˚C and 8˚C. However, shelf life of sliced papaya is about 2 days due to the flesh softening and off-odor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref8">8</xref>]. Water loss is one of the major problems of sliced papaya. Sliced fruits are very perishable because they lack protective pericarp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref9">9</xref>]. Additionally, the pulp is very vulnerable to dehydration, discoloration, and spoilage bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Chitosan is a cationic polysaccharide with a high molecular weight and a linear polymer which is composed of β-1, 4-linked glucosamine (GlcN) with various quantities of N-acetylated GlcN residues. It is obtained by the alkaline deacetylation of chitin extracted from an abundant source of shellfish exoskeletons or the cell walls of some microorganisms and fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref11">11</xref>]. Chitosan is soluble in dilute organic acids, and could theoretically be used as a preservative for coating fruit. The coating is non-toxic and safe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref12">12</xref>], and exhibits antifungal activity against several fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref13">13</xref>]. A chitosan coating is known to have the potential to prolong the storage life and control the decay of sliced mango, sliced red pitayas, strawberries, peaches, and longan fruits [14-17]. Coating fruit and vegetables with chitosan help the long-term storage of food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref13">13</xref>] because a chitosan film could act as a type of active package. The preservatives are released from the film deposited on the surface of the food and these could inhibit spoilage bacteria.</p><p>The effect of molecular weight on the physical properties of chitosan membranes has been reported. Low molecular weight chitosans (LMWC) have permeability higher than that of high molecular weight chitosans (HMWC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref18">18</xref>]. LMWC with an average molecular weight in the range 5000 - 20,000 Da were shown to exhibit superior biological activities than chitosan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref19">19</xref>]. Jeon, Park, and Kim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.36136-ref20">20</xref>] reported that LMWC had the highest bactericidal activity towards pathogenic bacteria. However, it seems that there is no information on the maintenance of quality of the sliced papayas using micronized chitosan (MC) coating. The aim of this research was to evaluate the potential use of a MC coating in controlling the decay, extending the postharvest life, and maintaining the quality of the sliced papayas during storage.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Chitosan Coating Solution</title><p>Chitosan (Mw = 357 &#177; 39 kDa) with 96.2% N-deacetylation were obtained from VA &amp; G Bioscience Inc. (Taoyuan, Taiwan). The non-micronized chitosan (NMC) was in powder form and prepared from crab shells. Before and after the micronization, the particle sizes of the micronization chitosan (MC) samples were estimated by the laser particle size analyzer (Analysette 22-Economy, Fritsch, Germany). To prepare one liter of 0.25%, 0.5% or 1% chitosan solutions, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 g of chitosan were dispersed in 900 ml of distilled water to which 50 ml of glacial acetic acid was added to dissolve the chitosan. The pH of the solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 with 0.1 M NaOH and the solution was made up to one liter. Acid solution without chitosan (pH 5.0) was used as control.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Materials</title><p>The papaya (Carica papara L., Tainung No. 2) used in the experiment was grown in Pingtung, Taiwan, and brought to the laboratory immediately after it was harvested. The fruit were selected for their uniformity, size, color, shape, and absence of damage and fungal infection. The 60 fruits were separated into groups of three, for treatment in triplicate. After washing, the fruit were peeled and sliced manually. The sliced papayas were then dipped into a chitosan coating solution for 1 min. After they had been air-dried for 30 min at 25˚C, the sliced fruit were placed into plastic trays, and over-wrapped with 30 &#215; 20 cm PVDC film (Wu-Yu Chemistry Co., Japan). They were then stored at 4˚C to be later assessed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Color Analysis</title><p>A CIELAB colorimetry system was used to determine the color. Coloration was determined using a ColorPen<sup>TM</sup> handy color difference photometer (Dr. Bruno Lange GmbH, Berlin, Germany), which recorded the spectrum of reflected light and converted it into a set of color coordinates (L, a<sup>*</sup>, and b<sup>*</sup> values). Color coordinates range from L = 0 (black) to L = 100 (white), –a<sup>*</sup> (greenness) to +a<sup>*</sup> (redness), and –b<sup>*</sup> (blueness) to +b<sup>*</sup> (yellowness). A Minolta standard white plate (X = 83.6, Y = 81.2, Z = 93.8) and a black plate were used to standardize the instruments.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Total Soluble Solids Determination</title><p>Pulp (100 g) from 10 fruits was homogenized in a grinder and then centrifuged at 3500 rpm (Du-Pont, model Sorvall RC-5C) for 20 min to remove the pomace. The supernatant phase was collected to be analyzed for the amount of soluble solids (using a hand refractometer; ATAGO, model N1).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Weight Loss Determination</title><p>Three batches of 100 slices underwent each treatment. Ten slices were removed from each treatment daily. The slices were weighed regularly to determine weight loss, which was calculated cumulatively by comparing the weights of fruit immediately after slicing and treatment with chitosan after various storage times. The results were expressed as percentages.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Microbiological Analysis</title><p>A 10 g sample was obtained following homogenization in 90 ml 0.1% peptone water (Difico, 0118-17-0). Other decimal dilutions were prepared from a 10<sup>−1</sup> dilution. The total plate count was determined via the pour plate method, with Plate Count Agar (Difco, 0479-17) as the medium. The plates were incubated at 35˚C for 48 h. Three samples in each group were analyzed. All counts were presented as average values over three samples.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Three analyses of each sample were performed and each experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3). The mean values and the standard deviation were calculated based on the data obtained. These data were then compared using the Duncan’s-multiple range method.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Color</title><p>The L value of the sliced papayas decreased with storage time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). After four days of storage, the L values of the fruit treated with chitosan coating solution did not vary significantly. However, the chitosan-coated sliced papayas and uncoated sliced papayas were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). The results indicate that chitosan coating had the ability to maintain the lightness of the sliced papayas. Surface color measurements showed that the a<sup>*</sup> value of the sliced papayas increased with storage time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The a<sup>*</sup> value of uncoated sliced papayas</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of non-micronized and micronized chitosan-coating on color and total soluble solids of sliced papaya during storage at 4˚C</title></caption></table-wrap-group><p>increased significantly from 50.66 &#177; 1.34 to 75.91 &#177; 0.67 during four days of storage. The increase in the redness was probably caused by an increase in the respiration rate and the promotion of enzymatic processes that were responsible for a drop in quality of the fruit, which involved browning and other reactions. The a<sup>*</sup> value associated with the chitosan treatment was lower than that of the control. Also, the a<sup>*</sup> values of the MC-coated sliced papayas were significantly lower than those of the NMCcoated. After four days of storage, the b<sup>*</sup> value associated with the MC treatment (1%) was significantly lower than that of the control. The yellowness of the 1% MC-coated sliced papayas was not significantly changed after storage.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Total Soluble Solids</title><p>The total soluble solid contents did not vary significantly among the sliced papayas treated with 0.25%, 0.5% chitosan (non-micronized and micronized) and uncoated. The total soluble solid contents of all samples (coated and uncoated) were not significantly changed after two days of storage. However, the sliced papayas that had been treated with 1% MC had a lower total soluble solid content after four days of storage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Minimal processed papaya is very perishable and has a short shelf life due to the increased tissue disruption, respiration, and acceleration of fruit ripening (Rolle &amp; Chism, 1987; King &amp; Bolin, 1989; Watada &amp; Abe, 1990). The result indicates that the 1% MC treatment had the ability to delay the ripening of the sliced papayas during storage, which could prolong their shelf life.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Weight Loss</title><p>Water loss or transpiration is another factor that affects the quality of fresh-cut papaya. A chitosan coating retarded the weight loss of the sliced papayas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Higher weight loss was observed in the control samples after two days of storage. After four days of storage, the weight losses of the control and 1% MC-coated sliced papayas were 5.82% and 3.86%, respectively. The weight loss was mainly due to transpiration and the leakage of juice from the pulp. Therefore, one of advantageous effect of chitosan coating on the loss of weight by papaya pulp was reducing transpiration and leakage of juice.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Microbiological Analysis</title><p>The total plate counts of uncoated, NMC-coated, and MC-coated sliced papayas were presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The total plate counts of uncoated samples increased from 2.70 to 5.22 log CFU/g at the end of the storage. After four days of storage, the total plate counts of the control and 1% MC-coated sliced papayas were 5.22 and 3.45 log CFU/g, respectively. The chitosan coating on the sliced papaya effectively inhibited the growth of microorganisms.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>After four days of storage, the L values of the chitosancoated sliced papayas and uncoated sliced papayas were significantly different. The results indicate that chitosan coating had the ability to maintain the lightness of the sliced papayas. The a<sup>*</sup> values of the MC-coated sliced papayas were significantly lower than those of the NMCcoated. The sliced papayas that had been treated with 1% MC had a higher total soluble solid content and lower b<sup>*</sup> value after four days of storage. Also, the chitosan coating on the sliced papaya effectively retarded water loss and inhibited the growth of microorganisms.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Abbreviations</title><p>NMC: non-micronized chitosan</p><p>MC: micronized chitosan</p><p>PVDC: polyvinylidenechloride</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.36136-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. E. Paull and N. J. Chen, “Postharvest Variation in Cell Wall-Degrading Enzymes of Papaya (Carica papaya L.) during Fruit Ripening,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 72, No. 2, 1983, pp. 382-385. ,”doi:10.1104/pp.72.2.382</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. K. Akamine and T. Goo, “Relationship between Sur    face Colour Development and Total Soluble Solids in Pa    paya,” HortScience, Vol. 6, 1971, pp. 567-568.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. F. An and R. E. Paull, “Storage Temperature and Eth    ylene Influence on Ripening of Papaya Fruit,” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Vol. 115, No. 6, 1990, pp. 949-953.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. E. Paull and W. Chen, “Minimal Processing of Papaya (Carica papaya L.) and the Physiology of Halved Fruit,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1997, pp. 93-99. doi:10.1016/S0925-5214(97)00030-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Rolle and G. W. Chism, “Physiological Conse    quences of Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables,” Journal of Food Quality, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1987, pp. 157    177. ,”doi:10.1111/j.1745-4557.1987.tb00856.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. King and H. R. Bolin, “Physiological and Microbi    ological Storage Stability of Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables,” Food Technology, Vol. 43, 1989, pp. 132-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. E. Watada, K. Abe and N. Yamuchi, “Physiological Activities of Partially Processed Fruits and Vegetables,” Food Technology, Vol. 44, 1990, pp. 116-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. E. O’Connor-Shaw, R. Roberts, A. L. Ford and S. M. Nottingham, “Shelf Life of Minimally Processed Honeydew, Kiwifruit, Papaya, Pineapple and Cantaloupe,” Jour    nal of Food Science, Vol. 59, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1202-1206.  
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb14676.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Tovar, H. S. Garcia and M. Mata, “Physiology of Pre    Cut Mango. II. Evolution of Organic Acids,” Food Re    search International, Vol. 34, No. 8, 2001, pp. 705-714.  
doi:10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00092-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. A. Baldwin, M. O. Nisperos-Carried and R. A. Baker, “Use of Edible Coating for Lightly Processed Fruits and Vegetables,” HortScience, Vol. 30, 1995, pp. 35-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Hirano, Y. Ohe and H. One, “Selective N-Acetylation of Chitosan,” Carbohydrate Research, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1976, pp. 315-320. doi:10.1016/S0008-6215(00)84198-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Hirano, C. Itakura, H. Seino, Y. Akiyama , I. Nonata and N. Kanbara , “Chitosan as an Ingredient for Domestic Animal Feeds,” Journal of Agriculture and Food Chem    istry, Vol. 38, 1990, pp. 1214-1217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. El Ghaouth, J. Arul, J. Grenier and A. Asselin, “Anti    fungal Activity of Chitosan on Two Postharvest Patho    gens of Strawberry Fruits,” Phytopathology, Vol. 82, No. 4, 1992, pp. 398-402. ,”doi:10.1094/Phyto-82-398</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J. Chien, F. Sheu and H. R. Lin , “Quality Assessment of Low Molecular Weight Chitosan Coating on Sliced Red Pitayas,” Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 79, No. 2, 2007, pp. 736-740. ,”doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J. Chien, F. Sheu and F. H. Yang, “Effects of Edible Chitosan Coating on Quality and Shelf Life of Sliced Mango Fruit,” Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2007, pp. 225-229. ,”doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. El Ghaouth, J. Arul, R. Ponnamapalam and M. Boulet, “Chitosan Coating Effect on Storability and Quality of Fresh Strawberries,” Journal of Food Science, Vol. 56, No. 6, 1991, pp. 1618-1620.  
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08655.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Jiang and Y. Li, “Effects of Chitosan Coating on Postharvest Life and Quality of Longan Fruit,” Food Chemistry, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2001, pp. 143-159.  
doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00246-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. H. Chen and H. D. Hwa, “Effect of Molecular Weight of Chitosan with the Same Degree of Deacetylation on the Thermal, Mechanical, and Permeability Properties of the Prepared Membrane,” Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1996, pp. 353-358.  
doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(96)00007-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Muzzarelli and R. A. Muzzarelli, “Natural and Artifi    cial Chitosan-Inorganic Composites,” Journal of Inor    ganic Biochemistry, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2002, pp. 89-94.  
doi:10.1016/S0162-0134(02)00486-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.36136-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. J. Jeon, P. J. Park and S. K. Kim, “Antimicrobial Ef    fect of Chitooligosaccharides Produced by Bioreactor,” Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2001, pp. 71-76.  
doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00200-9</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>