<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JFCMV</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Flow Control, Measurement &amp; Visualization</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2329-3322</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jfcmv.2013.12006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JFCMV-34552</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Comparison Study of Cavitating Flow in a Ventricular Assist Device Using Laminar and Turbulent Model
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hengkuo</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiahn-Horng</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>b0105@mail.ntou.edu.tw(JC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>01</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>25,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The two-dimensional cavitating flow phenomena due to the valve closure in a ventricular assist device were computationally studied. This is a simplification of three-dimensional viscous effects in a ventricular valve. Both laminar flow and turbulent flow were computed and compared with each other. For computations, a dynamic mesh strategy to cope with the movement of the valve was developed. The simulation of cavitation was conducted with a model which took considerations of the first-order effect of the formation and transport of vapor bubbles, the turbulent fluctuations of pressure and velocity, and the magnitude of non-condensable gases. The turbulent flow was computed by using thek-wmodel. The results show that the local turbulence is one of the vital effects on the development of the cavitating flow. The maximum velocity at the moments of valve closure was significantly reduced in the turbulent flow modeling. Turbulence also reduces the jet intensity at the valve closure and, hence, the cavitating region on the valve. Furthermore, the results show that the turbulent flow model has a better capability for prediction of cavitation duration.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cavitation; Ventricular Assist Device; Valve; Turbulent Flow; Laminar Flow</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cavitation was first related to valves of a mechanical heart in the 1980s after a series of valve fractures of a particular valve were observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref1">1</xref>]. Since then, many experimental and computational efforts have been devoted to understanding the flow and its detrimental effects on long-term operations of ventricular assist devices or artificial hearts. It has been known that cavitation could result in damage of blood cells and, hence, increase the risk of thromboembolic complications found in patients implanted with a mechanical heart. Various techniques for in vivo and/or in vitro detection of cavitation have been developed in the past few decades [2-6]. From the physical point view, such cavitating phenomena arises partially due to the fact that the pressure surge and the water hammer effect happen in closing ventricular valve (see, e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref7">7</xref>]). The drastic transient pressure change resulted from the pressure surge makes the cavitation even worse and more complicated.</p><p>In addition to various physiological issues, many physical phenomena due to mechanical heart valve closure have also been studied experimentally. Wu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref8">8</xref>] developed a laser sweeping technique which was capable of monitoring the valve closing motion with microsecond precision. Their observations show that at valve closure, the water hammer pressure reduction in combination with the high energy squeeze jet formed an environment favoring micro cavitation inceptions. Lee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref9">9</xref>] studied cavitation dynamics for different mechanical mitral heart valves using a stroboscopic visualization technique. Their in vitro study revealed several sources of cavitation initiation, including occluder stop, inflow strut, and clearance. They also concluded that the effects of fluid squeezing and the streamline contraction are major factors inducing cavitation incipience. Biancucci et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref10">10</xref>] used a mock circulatory loop and videotaped the valve motion and the fluid flow around it. They found that gas bubbles formed during valve operation in the low pressure region due to gaseous nuclei and the presence of CO<sub>2</sub>. More recently, the high density particle image velocimetry technique has been developed. Detailed flow description becomes possible. It was found that the rebound effect played a significant role in the cavitation formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref11">11</xref>]. Lim et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref12">12</xref>] further employed the high-speed flow imaging technique to identify regions of cavitation and found that the temporal fluid acceleration played an important role on cavitation inception. All these findings provide important inferences in the design of mechanical heart valves.</p><p>With the advancement of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the numerical simulation has become an important strategy in the industrial design process for verifying and validating new product designs. This is no exception in the design of mechanical heart valves and ventricular assist devices. Makhihani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref13">13</xref>] specified the valve closing motion which was measured in vitro as input data and used a CFD package to compute the flow field. They predicted the possibility of cavitation inception by observing whether the fluid pressures dropped below the blood saturated vapor pressure. Lai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref14">14</xref>] employed CFD model to analyze the valve closure process and successfully evaluated the effect of alternations in the valve tip geometry. They concluded that a decrease of the tip velocity in the last few degrees led to a significant reduction of the negative pressure magnitude and, hence, the possibility of cavitation. Later, Cheng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref15">15</xref>] extended the CFD study to three-dimensional cases and observed vertical flow development during the valve impact-rebound phase.</p><p>It is quite unfortunate that most computational studies were restricted to laminar flow simulations though it is well known that cavitation usually happens in a highspeed region where the flow is usually turbulent. Furthermore, the inception of cavitation is usually indirectly inferred by observing whether the pressure drops below the saturated vapor pressure. In fact, it is vital to develop turbulent flow computation strategies with more realistic cavitation models to cope more rigorously with the medical physical phenomenon. Recently, Huang and Chen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref16">16</xref>] first proposed a k-w turbulent model and employed a more realistic cavitation model to analyze the cavitation inception and process during the valve closure. The computed cavitation time endurance agrees with that available in the literature. In the present study, we applied the similar strategy to simulate the flow of a mechanical heart valve closure and compared the results obtained by laminar and turbulent models.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Physical Problem</title><p>Shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, a two-dimensional bileaflet valve system in a channel is analyzed in the present study. The length and width of the channel is L and 2w, respectively. Point O is the pivot of the valve. The lengths from both valve ends to the pivot is <img src="1-2760002\8ff289c5-86b9-4ea6-80ab-77653432824f.jpg" /> and<img src="1-2760002\cfc443f9-b314-413f-8483-818c2e0bcd7b.jpg" />, respectively. The gauge pressure variations at the inlet and outlet are specified as <img src="1-2760002\395e80de-8005-4f00-9b53-e6750f3df65a.jpg" /> and<img src="1-2760002\11874341-37a1-432d-a30a-731aa1961ee5.jpg" />, respectively. The angular position of valve is given by<img src="1-2760002\7b33e870-b7d0-4222-b9b9-5fd29acfd2d0.jpg" />.</p><p>Considering the cavitating effects, the two-dimensional governing equations can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5466"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\b9101777-5165-450c-964a-27586036cf88.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5467"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\30fa5d7d-85a8-4c98-827b-db1bddf5b205.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-2760002\51d3d0f7-561a-4841-9a3a-aa2c6fb94432.jpg" /> and <img src="1-2760002\a9d647c0-b646-4ebc-afe4-9a521cb2ef55.jpg" /> are the mixed density and velocity defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5468"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\a8703272-2aee-4185-834e-866d16f5d3ec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(<img src="1-2760002\bdb2aff2-74b8-4034-a102-295d68afee40.jpg" />represents the volume fraction of phase k = 1 and 2 for liquid and gas phase, respectively) and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5469"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\21004c6f-2b82-4ed3-bbee-94ccf301662b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>respectively. Furthermore, p denotes the pressure and <img src="1-2760002\1f4f4c1d-d7bb-4c60-9342-2077359163ab.jpg" /> the mixed viscosity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5470"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\33915d2f-4619-4322-a333-855db3a4dfd1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The drift velocity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5471"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\03768c7b-1f20-4a59-8899-515e4477c693.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To find the fluid velocities and densities of liquid and gas phases, we employed the full cavitation model proposed by Singhal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref17">17</xref>]. This model employs a homogeneous flow approach and assumes that there are plenty nuclei for the cavitation inception. The following first-order effects are considered: the formation and transport of vapor bubbles, the turbulent fluctuations of pressure and velocity, and the magnitude of non-condensable gases. In the model, the phase-change vapor pressure is taken at</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5472"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\9796457c-8c3a-4e74-aaa1-7d84519ae7be.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-2760002\2f8dec43-7810-4004-a135-ba960af49d38.jpg" /> is the saturation pressure of liquid and <img src="1-2760002\9ef8685b-d5b9-45ad-a4a5-c872220984e1.jpg" /> the turbulent pressure fluctuations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34552-formula5473"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-2760002\5da02fad-2ee8-4eed-bf5b-00e578ad43d2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with k being denoted the turbulent kinetic energy. The bubble growth and collapse is considered with the assumption of a zero velocity slip between fluid and bubbles. In addition, we also assume that the flow is isothermal and the fluid properties are constant in the whole flow domain. This implies that the cavitation is decoupled from heat transfer and radiation. For further elaboration of the bubble dynamics, please refer to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Furthermore, to take account of the local turbulent flow effect, we used the k-w turbulence model which is more suitable to model turbulent flow at a smaller Reynolds number. The model employed in the present study is based on the results of Wilcox [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref18">18</xref>]. It is applicable to wall-bounded flows. For further elaboration of the equation systems taking cavitation into considerations, please refer to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>As shown in the governing equations, Equations (1) and (2), the mixture model is employed in the present study. The local velocity and density are functions of the volume fraction of vapor phase which is, in turn, controlled by the cavitation model through the bubble dynamics equation. Therefore, the local transition from laminar to turbulent flow can be influenced by the presence of cavitation. The interaction between the transition and cavitation is complicated and determined by the turbulence model, cavitation model, and the flow governing equations. Such an interaction could be an interesting fundamental issue but is beyond the present scope of study.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Numerical Method and Mesh Strategy</title><p>The commercial code FLUENT (version 6.3) was employed for the present study. In the code, the finite volume method was employed to discretize all differential equations and the algorithm of pressure implicit with splitting of operators (PISO) was adopted for nonlinear iterations of pressure and velocity solutions. The PISO algorithm is efficient and more accurate to solve the Navier-Stokes equations in unsteady problems because the momentum corrector step is performed more than once, compared to the traditional SIMPLE algorithm. The numerical procedures to compute the laminar and turbulent flows are identical except that the latter employed a turbulence model.</p><p>In the present study, the valve moves in time from a vertical position to a horizontal one. To cope with the motion, we employed a local dynamic mesh strategy which combines the spring-smoothing method and the local remeshing method. Shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, we divided the computational domain into three regions. In the regions away from and around the valve, a structured cartesian mesh was employed. The reason we used a structured grid around the valve is that it ensures better grid orthogonality and, hence, better solution quality in the region near the valve. In the region where the valve motion occurs, a non-structured mesh was generated.</p><p>With the valve motion, the mesh must be regenerated at each time step. However, since in computations, the time step is usually very small, it is not necessary to</p><p>remesh at every time step. Rather, we employed the spring-smoothing method to stretch and/or compress the local mesh near the valve in several consecutive time steps. When the local mesh becomes severely distorted, we remesh the grids around the valve. The grids near the valve at different times are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussions</title><p>In the following study, the geometric data we used for analysis are L = 38.1mm, w = 12.21 mm, <img src="1-2760002\2e0788d1-d1a2-408e-93e3-cae6f2fd4dd4.jpg" />mm, and <img src="1-2760002\311db572-209e-4123-92a3-635652d7f90e.jpg" /> mm. The densities for liquid and gas are <img src="1-2760002\304b65f1-9b6b-48c8-9818-20284fdf267b.jpg" /> kg/m<sup>3</sup> and <img src="1-2760002\d978b51c-7943-4a85-ab02-6524a15bfcc5.jpg" /> kg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Furthermore, their dynamic viscosities are <img src="1-2760002\9ee0f5f0-4303-4171-98e7-b32d65bc1f11.jpg" /> kg/m&#215;sec and <img src="1-2760002\22f581e1-2e0e-4c1e-9a25-93cdc071c60a.jpg" /> kg/m&#215;sec, respectively.</p><p>For comparison purposes, the specification of the inlet and outlet pressures and the valve rotation follows that in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref14">14</xref>]. The inlet pressure <img src="1-2760002\88b79311-b250-48e8-8e86-507a2b4f1b03.jpg" /> increases at a rate of 2 mmHg/ms from zero at t = 0 sec till it reaches 120 mmHg. The outlet pressure <img src="1-2760002\c4c1c39c-db2a-449b-943e-313eb5fdba2d.jpg" /> keeps at zero for all time. The valve is at its vertical position at t = 0 sec as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and rotates at a rate specified in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34552-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>After several tests, the appropriate time step is <img src="1-2760002\ce6746d0-b616-4ce3-be7b-9017a0007503.jpg" /> <img src="1-2760002\0d5227da-fee7-456c-a7ad-abce6a964315.jpg" /> sec. However, for a better resolution of cavitation phenomena, we require that <img src="1-2760002\67c53ff9-238a-472a-98dc-586513debf0e.jpg" /> sec.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Velocity Distribution before Cavitation</title><p>Figures 4 and 5 show the velocity distributions at different values of t for both the laminar and turbulent models, respectively. Due to the turbulence viscosity in the turbulent model, it is expected that the maximum velocity is significantly reduced in the turbulent flow simulation. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the maximum speed in the flow field at some particular time.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the maximum value variation of k with respect to time when we employed the turbulent flow model. Evidently, the flow is laminar at time t &lt; 0.015 sec. Due to the increase of velocity, the flow begins to exhibit turbulent characteristic during 0.015 sec &lt;</p></sec></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.34552-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Johansen, “Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2004, pp. 95-104. doi:10.1586/17434440.1.1.95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. M. Zapanta, D. R. Stein-bring, D. S. Sneckenberger, S. Deutsch, D. B. Geselowitz, J. M. Tarbell, A. J. Synder, G. Rosenberg, W. J. Weiss, W. E. Pai and W. S. Pierce, “In Vivo Observation of Cavitation on Prosthetic Heart Valves,” ASAIO Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, 1992, pp. M550-M555. 
doi:10.1097/00002480-199609000-00047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. K. Paulsen, B. K. Jensen, J. M. Hasenkam and H. Nygaard, “High-Frequency Pressure Fluctuations Measured in Heart Valve Patients,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1999, pp. 482-487.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. S. Andersen, P. Johansen, P. K. Paulsen, H. Nygaard and J. M. Hasenkam, “Indication of Cavitation in Mechanical Heart Valve Patients,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2003, pp. 790-796.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. A. Herman, J. M. Porter and R. F. Carey, “Study of an Acoustic Technique to Detect Cavitation Produced by a Tilting Disc Valve,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1996, pp. 90-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. C. Shu, L. H. Leuer, T. L. Armitage, T. E. Schneider and D. R. Christiansen, “In Vitro Observations of Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 1994, pp. S85-S93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Nakayama and R. F. Boucher, “Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,” Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. J. Wu, Y. Wang and N. H. Hwang, “Occluder Closing Behavior: A Key Factor in Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 1994, pp. S25-S34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. S. Lee, K. B. Chandran and L. D. Chen, “Cavitation Dynamics of Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses,” Artificial Organs, Vol. 18, No. 10, 1994, pp. 758-767. 
doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.1994.tb03315.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. A. Biancucci, S. Deutsch, D. B. Geselowitz and J. M. Tarbell, “In Vitro Studies of Gas Bubble Formation by Mechanical Heart Valves,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, pp. 186-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Kini, C. Bachmann, A. Fontaine, S. Deutsch and J. M. Tarbell, “Flow Visualization in Mechanical Heart Valves: Occluder Rebound and Cavitation Potential,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2000, pp. 431-441. doi:10.1114/1.281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. L. Lim, Y. T. Chew, H. T. Low and W. L. Foo, “Cavitation Phenomena in Mechanical Heart Valves: Role of Squeeze Flow Velocity and Contact Area on Cavitation Initiation between Two Impinging Rods,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1269-1280. 
doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00161-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. B. Makhihani, H. Q. Yang, A. K. Singhal and N. H. Hwang, “An Experimental-Computational Analysis of MHV Cavitation: Effects of Leaflet Squeezing and Rebound,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 1994, S35-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. G. Lai, K. B. Chandran and J. Lemmon, “A Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Closure Fluid Dynamics,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2002, pp. 881-892. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00056-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Cheng, Y. G. Lai and K. B. Chandran, “Three-DimenSional Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Flow Dynamics,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2004, pp. 1471- 1483. doi:10.1114/B:ABME.0000049032.51742.10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. K. Huang and J. H. Chen, “A Numerical Analysis of Cavitating Flow Due to a Closing Valve,” Journal of Taiwan Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2011, pp. 171-180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Singhal, M. M. Athavale, H. Li and Y. Jiang, “Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model,” Journal of Fluid Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 3, 2002, pp. 617-624. doi:10.1115/1.1486223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. C. Wilcox, “Turbulence Modeling for CFD,” DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34552-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Katz, “Cavitation Inception in Separated Flows,” Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>