<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSEMAT</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Surface Engineered Materials and Advanced Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-4881</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jsemat.2013.33027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSEMAT-34222</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epitaxial Ge Growth on Si(111) Covered with Ultrathin SiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Films
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>lexander</surname><given-names>A. Shklyaev</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Konstantin</surname><given-names>N. Romanyuk</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>V. Latyshev</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>A. V. Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia;</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>A. V. Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>07</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>204</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>6th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>June</day>	<month>7th,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>27th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The epitaxial growth of Ge on Si(111) covered with the 0.3 nm thick SiO<sub>2</sub> film is studied by scanning tunneling microscopy. Nanoareas of bare Si in the SiO<sub>2</sub> film are prepared by Ge deposition at a temperature in the range of 570℃-650℃ due to the formation of volatile SiO and GeO molecules. The surface morphology of Ge layers grown further at 360℃-500℃ is composed of facets and large flat areas with the Ge(111)-c(2 &#215; 8) reconstruction which is typical of unstrained Ge. Orientations of the facets, which depend on the growth temperature, are identified. The growth at 250℃-300℃ produces continuous epitaxial Ge layers on Si(111). A comparison of the surface morphology of Ge layers grown on bare and SiO<sub>2</sub>-film covered Si(111) surfaces shows a significantly lower Ge-Si intermixing in the latter case due to a reduction in the lattice strain. The found approach to reduce the strain suggests the opportunity of the thin continuous epitaxial Ge layer formation on Si(111).
     
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ge/Si Heterostructures; Epitaxial Growth; Surface Morphology; Scanning Tunneling Microscopy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Further development of optoelectronics and photonics can be associated with the fabrication of integrated devices based on III-V semiconductors grown on Si substrates [1,2]. The preparation of continuous thin GaAs layers by their growth on the bare Si surfaces is impeded because of the large lattice mismatch (~4%) between GaAs and Si. The growth occurs through the StranskiKrastanov growth mode, leading to the formation of three-dimensional islands. Since the lattice constants of Ge and GaAs are almost equal, Ge or SiGe layers can be used as an intermediate layer between Si and GaAs [3-5]. Moreover, Ge layers on Si improve the performance of integrated Si circuits due to a greater hole mobility in Ge. For these purposes, the preparation of continuous thin Ge layers with good crystalline quality on Si is required.</p><p>The Ge growth on Si(111) proceeds through the formation of a Ge wetting layer with the thickness of 2 - 3 bilayers (BL) [6-8]. Further Ge deposition leads to the three-dimensional island formation, the shape and size of which strongly depend on the growth temperature [7,9, 10]. The growth is accompanied by the introduction of threading dislocations into the islands and a dislocation network into the Ge layer at the interface between Ge and Si [11-13]. When the growth temperatures are above 500˚C, the lattice strain causes the significant intermixing of Ge and Si atoms [14-16]. The strain, being most strong at the island edges, induces the formation of deep trenches around large flat islands [17-19]. All these factors prevent the formation of continuous thin Ge layers on Si(111).</p><p>Nanocontact epitaxy has been recently proposed to grow continuous layers of semiconductor materials on Si despite the large difference in their lattice constants [20,21]. The method is based on the use of Si surfaces covered with the ultrathin SiO<sub>2</sub> film. Ge deposition on such surfaces at rather high temperatures results in the formation of bare Si nanoareas with the size depending on the amount of deposited Ge and temperature [22-25]. The distance between the areas is 7 - 10 nm. The areas of bare Si in the SiO<sub>2</sub> film appear due to the reaction of deposited Ge with SiO<sub>2</sub> producing the volatile SiO and GeO molecules [22,23]. The bare Si nanoareas serve for the epitaxial growth of semiconductor materials which can form a continuous layer due to the island nucleation and growth over the residuals of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film. The nanocontact epitaxy is studied here with respect to revealing the possibility of thin continuous epitaxial Ge layer formation on Si(111) substrates covered with ultrathin SiO<sub>2</sub> films. The influence of the technological parameters, such as growth temperature and Ge coverage on the structure and the surface morphology of the grown Ge layers, is examined using scanning tunneling microscopy.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Details</title><p>The experiments were carried out in an ultrahigh-vacuum chamber with the base pressure of about 1 &#215; 10<sup>−10</sup> Torr. The chamber was equipped with a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) manufactured by Omicron. A Knudsen cell with a BN crucible was used for Ge deposition at the rate from 0.5 to 1.1 BL/min [1 bilayer (BL) <img src="7-1180162\7ff51d7a-bc72-4727-9770-7253e9bf783b.jpg" />1.44 &#215; 10<sup>15</sup> atoms/cm<sup>2</sup>] which was calibrated with the STM for the Ge wetting layer growth on the Si(111) surface. After electrochemical etching, the sharp W STM tips were modified by tip apex cut from several sides using the 30 kV Ga ion beam of a separate Zeiss 1540 XB cross beam scanning electron microscope. The opening angle of sharpened STM tips was less than 25˚. The STM images of the surfaces covered with Ge were usually obtained with the sample bias voltage of 2.4 V and the constant current between 3 and 30 pA.</p><p>A 10 &#215; 2 &#215; 0.3 mm<sup>3</sup> sample was cut from an n-type Si(111) wafer with a miscut angle of &lt; 10' and the resistivity of 5 - 10 Ω&#183;cm. Clean Si surfaces were prepared by flash direct-current heating at 1200˚C. The sample temperature was measured using IMPAC IGA 12 pyrometer. To grow the ultrathin SiO<sub>2</sub> film, the sample temperature was set to 400˚C and raised to 550˚C for 10 min after oxygen had been introduced into the chamber at the pressure of 2 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> Torr. The SiO<sub>2</sub> film, prepared at the similar conditions, was previously investigated to be 0.3 - 0.5 nm thick and mainly composed of silicon dioxide (SiO<sub>2</sub>) and it also contained Si atoms at different oxidation stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref26">26</xref>]. However, it is named here as the SiO<sub>2</sub> film. After the SiO<sub>2</sub> film growth, the chamber was pumped to the pressure of ~1 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> Torr for 10 min and then the Ge crucible temperature was set to the range from 1110 to 1150˚C. The sample temperature was being maintained for 5 min after finishing the deposition. Image processing and correction software were employed to reduce distortion of the STM images caused by effects of thermal drift of the STM tip against the sample and to obtain statistical characteristics of the surface morphology, such as stereographic projections of surface areas and portions of the areas as a function of their inclination angle with respect to the sample surface.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Surface Morphology at a Relatively Small Ge Coverage</title><p>The 4 BL Ge deposition on Si(111) covered with the ultrathin SiO<sub>2</sub> film results in the appearance of Ge islands, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, without the formation of Ge wetting layers. The interaction of Ge with SiO<sub>2</sub> occurs through the reaction [22,23]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34222-formula130343"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-1180162\f66d1334-d54a-4593-8fdd-9ebd43ad1b4e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>producing volatile SiO and GeO molecules at temperatures above 430˚C. Reaction (1) has a strong temperature dependence that is characterized by the activation energy of 2 - 3 eV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref27">27</xref>]. This leads to the appearance of bare Si surface areas in the SiO<sub>2</sub> film. Then other reactions</p><p><img src="7-1180162\7c337622-4bbc-436a-9d10-e22730f5371c.jpg" />and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.34222-formula130344"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-1180162\693ea77f-a554-4fb4-bebb-ed41615aa382.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>start competing with reaction (1). These are the attachment of deposited Ge atoms to the bare Si areas, giving nucleation and growth of the epitaxial Ge islands. Reactions (2) include the surface diffusion and are characterized by the activation energy of about 1 eV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>The density of Ge island arrays and the lateral island size are independent of the growth temperature up to about 570˚C, whereas the density decreases and the lateral size increases with the temperature in the higher temperature range between 570˚C and 650˚C. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows that at 590˚C the island size increases with the increasing Ge coverage so that, at a coverage of 3 BL, the separation between some islands disappears and the islands start to merge. This causes the appearance of large variations in the island size under the further Ge deposition [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)]. At higher temperatures the larger islands continue to grow, while smaller islands can decrease in size and even disappear [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)]. This feature looks like Oswald ripening that occurs under the lattice strain, which increases with Ge coverage.</p><p>The temperature dependence of the Ge island formation can be explained by a large difference in the activetion energies of reactions (1) and (2). The STM data suggest that the rate of reaction (2) is substantially higher</p><p>than the rate of reaction (1) in the low temperature range up to about 590˚C. So, the reaction (1) acts only at the initial deposition stage until bare Si areas appear. Ge adatoms then start to preferably attach to these areas and form Ge islands by means of reaction (2), whereas reaction (1) is suppressed. As a result, Ge islands laterally grow over the residuals of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film. The rate of reaction (1) increases stronger with the increasing temperature due to the greater activation energy and becomes comparable to the rate of reaction (2) at temperatures above 590˚C at which the SiO<sub>2</sub> decomposition occurs simultaneously with the island growth. This leads to the formation of larger areas of direct contacts between the Si substrate and the growing Ge islands. At the same time, the Ge islands attain a larger lateral size and</p><p>smaller height. The continuous action of reaction (1) results in complete decomposition of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Ge growth at High Temperatures</title><p>After Ge island formation at the initial growth stage, the further Ge deposition or the sample annealing lead to the formation of large islands, when the temperature is in the range from 590˚C to 650˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The flat areas between the islands exhibit the 5 &#215; 5 reconstruction which is normally observed for the 2 BL Ge wetting layers grown on the bare Si(111) substrates [29-31]. The (111) planes on top of the islands possess the 7 &#215; 7 reconstruction that is similar for that known for Ge islands grown on the bare Si(111) surfaces [32-34]. The traces of the presence of threading dislocations in the islands were not found. The driving force for such surface morphology transformation is the lattice strain.</p><p>The Ge growth on the bare Si(111) surfaces has been studied in details [6-18,29-33]. For comparison with the above results the STM data for the Ge growth on the bare Si(111) surfaces at temperatures of 530˚C are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Deposited Ge forms large flat islands which are surrounded by trenches several nanometers deep [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)] [17,18]. The top plane of the islands has the 7 &#215; 7 reconstruction [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)] [32,33]. The reconstructed surface is slightly undulating and that reflects the presence of the dislocation network lying in Ge near the Ge/Si interface. The Ge islands also contain the</p><p>threading dislocations, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) [11-13]. When the islands start to coalesce at the further Ge deposition, the presence of the deep trenches around the islands gives rise to the formation of deep pits in the Ge layer. The important thing is that the dislocations appear in the Ge layer even if the surfactants are used to obtain continuous Ge layers on Si(111).</p><p>The surface morphology of Ge layers grown on bare and oxidized Si(111) surfaces at high temperatures is essentially different. The Ge growth on the bare Si(111) surfaces is accompanied by a significant intermixing of Ge and Si atoms that occurs to reduce the lattice strain [17,18,34]. During the Ge wetting layer formation, events of the intermixing happen preferably at the moment of embedding of deposited Ge atoms into the surface. After the appearance of three-dimensional islands, the strongest lattice strain appears along the perimeter of the islands [17,18]. This leads to the formation of trenches around the islands. The absence of the trenches, thus, suggests that the Ge islands are less strained when the oxidized Si(111) surface.</p><p>Dark and bright spots in the STM images of the 5 &#215; 5 reconstructed surface obtained from the areas between the islands (inset in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) shows the presence of structural defects, which are probably traces of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film. The residues of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film can reduce the strain between the Ge wetting layer and the Si substrate. If so, there would be no sufficiently strong driving forces also for Ge-Si intermixing during the formation the Ge wetting layer.</p><p>The Ge deposition on the oxidized Si(111) surface at the temperature of 650˚C and higher results in the appearance of relatively large and small islands. The large islands are surrounded by rather deep trenches and have a high aspect ratio of 0.2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) whose value may reflect the content of Si in the Ge islands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref35">35</xref>]. Such characteristics of the surface morphology indicate the appearance of a significant strain between the islands and the substrate due to the reduction of residuals of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film at the Ge/Si interface.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Shape of Ge Islands Grown at High Temperatures</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the data that were used to identify the facets orientation at the islands sidewalls appeared after Ge deposition on the oxidized Si(111) surfaces at temperatures in the range of 570˚C - 640˚C, at which trenches around the islands do not form. The data show that the sidewalls are mainly faceted by {311} planes and groups of facets with orientations close to {110} planes. Other facets occupy a much smaller part of the sidewalls and serve to smoothly join these main facets between themselves and also with the (111) plane on the flat top of the islands. The {311} facets are known to be the major stable planes for unstrained Ge and Si islands [36-40].</p><p>Among the facets with orientations near {110}, the largest areas on the sidewalls occupy planes inclined from (111) by angle θ of 27˚ - 29˚ and having angular divergence Δφ = 20.5˚ - 22.5˚ in the map of stereographic projections shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. The observation of</p><p>stable Ge facets with such an orientation has not been reported on. For Si surfaces the facets that have close orientations are {23 4 20} (θ = 30˚ and Δφ = 16.9˚), which were classified as MAJOR, and {651} (θ = 28.4˚ and Δφ = 21.5˚) (MINOR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref41">41</xref>]. The last facets have the orientations that are in good agreement with our experimental data and they are characterized by bright spots in the map of stereographic projections, covering relatively large sidewalls areas of the Ge islands.</p><p>Other facets with the orientations around {110} are identified to be {331} and {23 15 3}. These facets were previously classified as MAJOR for Ge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref37">37</xref>]. However, they produce low-intense spots in the map shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a).</p><p>The surface morphology of Ge layers grown at relatively high temperatures on the oxidized Si(111) surfaces composed of Ge wetting layer areas and islands which shape is determined by energetically preferable facets. This is essentially different from that observed for the bare Si(111) surfaces, where the surface morphology contains flat islands without well defined facets on the sidewalls, deep trenches around the islands, threading dislocations and traces of the presence of the dislocation network near the Ge-Si interface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The difference arises from the difference in the lattice strain.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Influence of the Initial Growth Stage on Subsequent Ge Growth</title><p>The above results suggest that, in order to prevent the formation of large islands, the growth of Ge layers on the oxidized Si(111) surfaces should be carried out within several stages that differ in temperature. The initial stage at a high temperature in the range of 570˚C - 650˚C serves for the formation of nanoareas of bare Si surfaces and then that of epitaxial Ge nanoisland arrays with the concentration of the order of 10<sup>12</sup> cm<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>. The temperature of the next growth stage must be reduced to prevent the decomposition of SiO<sub>2</sub> film residuals. The surface morphology obtained when the temperature was lowered to 430˚C is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. The data in Figures 2 and 8 suggest that the preferable Ge coverage in the initial growth stage should be in the range of 1 - 2 BL. A larger coverage leads to a considerable variation of the islands in size and to non-uniformity in their spatial distribution due to the partial islands coalescence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d))</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Surface Morphology of Ge Layers Grown within Two Stages</title><p>As the Ge coverage increases to 30 BL in the two-stage growth, the facets appear on the sidewalls of the islands and the top of the islands becomes flat with (111) orientation. The data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> show that the largest facets on the sidewalls are {311}. They produce the brightest</p><p>spots in the map of stereographic projections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(b)). The sidewalls also contain small-sized facets with orientations around {110}. The large peak in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(c) shows that the facets on the sidewalls preferably incline from (111) by the angles of 28˚ - 30˚.</p><p>The coalescence of islands under further Ge deposition leads to a significant increase of the flat (111) areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). They undergo c(2 &#215; 4) and c(2 &#215; 8) reconstructions which are typical of the (111) surfaces of bulk Ge [42-44]. The observation of the reconstructions thus indicates that the grown epitaxial Ge layers on Si(111) are unstrained.</p><p>The STM data show that the ratio of the top flat areas to the areas of other facets, inclined from (111), increases with decreasing the growth temperature from 550 to 360˚C. This occurs simultaneously with the decrease of the depth of depressions between the flat areas. This tendency does not extend to a low-temperature range. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 shows that the Ge layers grown at 250˚C - 300˚C indeed exhibit a relatively low surface roughness; however, the surface morphology is mainly composed of small-sized stepped facets such as {433}, {755} and {775}, whereas the flat (111) areas occupy a relatively small portion of the surface. The root-mean-square roughness was estimated from the STM image, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1, to be about 2.8 nm for the 140 nm thick Ge</p><p>layer. The most prevalent {433} and {755} facets consist of atomic steps with edges towards<img src="7-1180162\0f9685d1-7d97-4f2f-b3fc-909c80c40444.jpg" />, which are the sort of stepped surfaces that were observed on the Ge surfaces cleaved in vacuum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref45">45</xref>] and found to be stable on the vicinal Ge surfaces inclined from (111) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref46">46</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Discussion</title><p>The idea of nanocontact epitaxy is to create the conditions for reducing a strain between the growing layer and the substrate by decreasing the area of their direct contact [20,21]. The Ge deposition of the oxidized Si surface produces bare Si areas in the SiO<sub>2</sub> film, which are a few nanometers in size and separated by the distance of 7 - 10 nm [22,47]. Transmission electron microscopy data reveal shifts of the Ge lattice with respect to the Si lattice at the Si/Ge interface that occurs in places where Ge is separated from Si by the residuals of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.34222-ref20">20</xref>]. In order to compensate the 4.2% lattice mismatch between Ge and Si, the shift should occur at the period of ~26 atoms, i.e., over the distance of 10 nm for the interface with (111) orientation. This distance is close to the average separation between the areas of bare Si that appear under Ge deposition on the oxidized Si(111) surfaces in the high-temperature range [22,23]. As shown here, the Ge layers with a significantly reduced stain can be epitaxially grown on Si(111) using this technique.</p><p>After the formation of epitaxial Ge nanoislands, the further Ge deposition at low temperatures leads to the growth and coalescence of the islands. In the places of the coalescence the stacking faults appear. Their concentration essentially depends on the growth temperature. The higher temperature provides the formation of higher crystalline quality Ge layers. At the same time, the temperature influences the surface morphology of the growing Ge layer. At relatively high temperatures, the surface morphology is composed of well-defined facets of energetically favorable planes; this does not, however, lead to a flat surface with the (111) orientation. The roughness of the surface can be decreased by decreasing the growth temperature. Thus, the temperature acts in different ways: i.e., the use of high temperatures improves the crystalline quality of Ge layers, but it induces the formation of a rather large roughness, whereas the use of low temperatures flattens the surface, but introduces crystal defects. This feature is an obstacle in obtaining atomically flat, about 100 nm thick, Ge layers with a high crystalline quality on Si(111) substrates.</p><p>The Ge layers grown on bare and oxidized Si(111) surfaces are characterized by the substantially different surface morphology caused by a difference in the lattice strain. The strong Si-Ge intermixing under the strain leads to the formation of deep trenches in Si substrates around large flat Ge islands [17,18] and the network of threading dislocations [11-3]. Even the use of surfactants does not allow one avoiding the dislocation formation. In case of oxidized Si surfaces, the role of strain is significantly reduced. As a result, the surface morphology has no sharp corners and steep facets on the sidewalls. Instead, it includes some additional faceting planes, such as {775}, {755} and {761}, which are not observed for Ge layers grown on the bare Si surfaces.</p><p>The use of the oxidized Si surface solves the problem of the strong Ge/Si lattice stain and significantly reduces the Ge-Si intermixing, but it does not provide obtaining thin Ge layers with atomically flat surfaces. It is suggested that the smoothing of the surface of growing layers can be achieved with the help of surfactants, as it has been experimentally and theoretically shown [48-50]. Surfactants also facilitate the surface diffusion of deposited atoms thereby providing the improvement of the crystalline quality of layers growing at low temperatures.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Conclusion</title><p>The initial Ge deposition on the oxidized Si(111) surfaces at temperatures in the range of 570˚C - 650˚C results in the formation of nanoareas of bare Si and Ge nanoislands arrays. Further Ge deposition leads to the decomposition of the SiO<sub>2</sub> film residuals and to the formation of the Ge wetting layer and large islands. A comparison of Ge deposition on bare and oxidized Si(111) surfaces shows that the Ge/Si lattice stain is substantially reduced in the latter case. To obtain nanoareas of bare Si and homogeneous arrays of epitaxial Ge nanoislands, the preferable Ge coverage in the initial stage is found to be 1 - 2 BL. The temperature must then be decreased to 500˚C or less to stop the SiO<sub>2</sub> film decomposition. After lowering the temperature, the shape of the growing islands evolves from rounded to faceted with a flat (111) plane on top. At the coverage of 30 - 140 nm, in addition to the (111) flat areas, the surface morphology is composed of {311} facets and facets lying around {110} and (111). The flat (111) areas exhibit the c(2 &#215; 8) reconstruction that is typical of unstrained bulk Ge. The use of oxidized Si(111) surfaces allows one to obtain thin continuous epitaxial Ge layers on Si(111); however, the suppression of three-dimensional growth is still required to make the layers atomically flat.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>10. Acknowledgements</title><p>We are grateful for the financial support by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant 11-07-00475-а), the Program of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences (project 24.21), and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (contract No. 16.518.11.7091).</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.34222-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Volz, A. Beyer, W. Witte, J. Ohlmann, I. Németh, B. Kunert and W. Stolz, “GaP-Nucleation on Exact Si(001) Substrates for III/V Device Integration,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 315, No. 1, 2011, pp. 37-47.  
doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.10.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. G. Ghalamestani, M. Berg, K. A. Dick and L.-E. Wernersson, “High Quality InAs and GaSb Thin Layers Grown on Si(111),” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 332, No. 1, 2011, pp. 12-16. 
doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2011.03.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu. B. Bolkhovityanov and O. P. Pchelyakov, “GaAs Epitaxy on Si Substrates: Modern Status of Research and Engineering,” Physics-Uspekhi, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2008, pp. 437-456. doi:10.1070/PU2008v051n05ABEH006529</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. G. Cederberg, D. Leonhardt, J. J. Sheng, Q. Li, M. S. Carroll and S. M. Han, “GaAs/Si Epitaxial Integration Utilizing a Two-Step, Selectively Grown Ge Intermediate Layer,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 312, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1291-1296. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.10.061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Destefanis, J.M. Hartmann, A. Abbadie, A. M. Papon and T. Billon, “Growth and Structural Properties of SiGe Virtual Substrates on Si(100), (110) and (111),” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 311, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1070-1079. 
doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.12.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. M. J. Maré, K. Nakagawa, F. M. Mulders, J. F. Van der Veen and K. L. Kavanagh, “Thin Epitaxial Ge-Si(111) Films: Study and Control of Morphology,” Surface Science, Vol. 191, No. 3, 1987, pp. 305-328.  
doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(87)81180-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U. K&amp;#246hler, O. Jusko, G. Pietsch, B. Müller and M. Henzler, “Strained-Layer Growth and Islanding of Germanium on Si (111)-(7 × 7) Studied with STM,” Surface Science, Vol. 248, No. 3, 1991, pp. 321-331.  
doi:10.1016/0039-6028(91)91178-Z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev, M. Shibata and M. Ichikawa, “Instability of Two-Dimensional Layers in the Stranski-Krastanov Growth Mode of Ge on Si(111),” Physical Review B, Vol. 58, No. 23, 1998, pp. 15647-15651.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.15647</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Voigtl&amp;#228nder and A. Zinner, “Simultaneous Molecular Beam Epitaxy Growth and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Imaging during Ge/Si Epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 63, No. 2, 1993, pp. 3055-3057. 
doi:10.1063/1.110256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev, M. Shibata and M. Ichikawa, “Ge Islands on Si(111) at Coverages near the Transition from Two-Dimensional to Three-Dimensional Growth,” Surface Science, Vol. 416, No. 1, 1998, pp. 192-199. 
doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00580-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Y. Shiryaev, F. Jensen, J. L. Hansen, J. W. Petersen and A. N. Larsen, “Nanoscale Structuring by Misfit Dislocations in Si1-xGex/Si Epitaxial Systems,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 78, No. 3, 1997, pp. 503-506. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Voigtl&amp;#228nder and N. Theuerkauf, “Ordered Growth of Ge Islands above a Misfit Dislocation Network in a Ge Layer on Si(111),” Surface Science, Vol. 461, No. 1-3, 2000, pp. L575-L580. 
doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00620-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. A. Teys, “Features of Atomic Processes at the Formation of a Wetting Layer and Nucleation of Three-Dimensional Ge Islands on Si(111) and Si(100) Surfaces,” JETP Letters, Vol. 96, No. 12, 2013, pp. 794-802.  
doi:10.1134/S0021364012240113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Gunnella, P. Castrucci, N. Pinto, I. Diavoli, D. Sébilleau and M. De Crescenzi, “X-Ray Photoelectron-Diffraction Study of Intermixing and Morphology at the Ge/ Si(001) and Ge/Sb/Si(001) Interface,” Physical Review B, Vol. 54, No. 12, 1996, pp. 8882-8891. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.8882</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. R. Qin, B. S. Swartzentruber and M. G. Lagally, “Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Identification of Atomic-Scale Intermixing on Si(100) at Submonolayer Ge Coverages,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 85, No. 17, 2000, pp. 3660-3663. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3660</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Ratto, F. Rosei, A. Locatelli, S. Cherifi, S. Fontana, S. Heun, P.-D. Szkutnik, A. Sgarlata, M. De Crescenzi and N. Motta, “Composition of Ge(Si) Islands in the Growth of Ge on Si(111) by x-Ray Spectromicroscopy,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2005, pp. 043516-1-043516-8. doi:10.1063/1.1832747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. I. Kamins, E. C. Carr, R. S. Williams and S. J. Rosner, “Deposition of Three-Dimensional Ge Islands on Si(001) by Chemical Vapor Deposition at Atmospheric and Reduced Pressures,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 81, No. 1, 1997, pp. 211-219. doi:10.1063/1.364084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Boscherini, G. Capellini, L. Di Gaspare, M. De Seta, F. Rosei, A. Sgarlata, N. Motta and S. Mobilio, “Ge-Si Intermixing in Ge Quantum Dots on Si,” Thin Solid Films, Vol. 380, No. 1-2, 2000, pp. 173-175. 
doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01496-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Valvo, C. Bongiorno, F. Giannazzo and A. Terrasi, “Localized Si Enrichment in Coherent Self-Assembled Ge Islands Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy on (001) Si Single Crystal,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 113, No. 3, 2013, pp. 033513-1-033513-17.  
doi:10.1063/1.4775772</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Nakamura, A. Murayama and M. Ichikawa, “Epitaxial Growth of High Quality Ge Films on Si(001) Substrates by Nanocontact Epitaxy,” Crystal Growth &amp; Design, Vol. 11, No. 7, 2011, pp. 3301-3305. doi:10.1021/cg200609u</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Nakamura, T. Miwa and M. Ichikawa, “Nanocontact Heteroepitaxy of thin GaSb and AlGaSb Films on Si Substrates Using Ultrahigh-Density Nanodot Seeds,” Nanotechnology, Vol. 22, No. 26, 2011, pp. 265301-1-265301-7. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/26/265301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev, M. Shibata and M. Ichikawa, “High-Density Ultrasmall Epitaxial Ge Islands on Si(111) Surfaces with a SiO2 Coverage,” Physical Review B, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2000, pp. 1540-1543. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev and M. Ichikawa, “Extremely Dense Arrays of Germanium and Silicon Nanostructures,” Physics-Uspekhi, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2008, pp. 133-161. 
doi:10.1070/PU2008v051n02ABEH006344</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Ghosh, D. Leonhardt and S. M. Han, “Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Thermal Stress Relief during Epitaxial Growth of Ge on Si Using Air-Gapped SiO2 Nanotemplates,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 99, No. 18, 2011, pp. 181911-1-181911-3. 
doi:10.1063/1.3659320</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Kuryliuk, O. Korotchenkov and A. Cantarero, “Carrier Confinement in Ge/Si Quantum Dots Grown with an Intermediate Ultrathin Oxide Layer,” Physical Review B, Vol. 85, No. 7, 2012, pp. 075406-1-075406-11. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Miyata, H. Watanabe and M. Ichikawa, “Thermal Decomposition of an Ultrathin Si Oxide Layer around a Si(001)-(2 × 1) Window,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 84, No. 5, 2000, pp. 1043-1046.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev, M. Aono and T. Suzuki, “Influence of Growth Conditions on Subsequent Submonolayer Oxide Decomposition on Si(111),” Physical Review B, Vol. 54, No. 15, 1996, 10890-10895. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.10890</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev and S. M. Repinsky, “Investigation of Ge Surface Self-Diffusion by Determination of Changes in the Reflection Intensity Profiles of Low-Energy Electron Diffraction,” Soviet Physics Semiconductors, Vol. 14, No. 7, 1980, pp. 767-772.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Voigtl&amp;#228nder, “Fundamental Processes in Si/Si and Ge/ Si Epitaxy Studied by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy during Growth,” Surface Science Reports, Vol. 43, No. 5-8, 2001, pp. 127-254. 
doi:10.1016/S0167-5729(01)00012-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Motta, A. Sgarlata, R. Calarco, Q. Nguyen, J. Castro Cal, F. Patella, A. Balzarotti and M. De Crescenzi, “Growth of Ge-Si(111) Epitaxial Layers: Intermixing, Strain Relaxation and Island Formation,” Surface Science, Vol. 406, No. 1-3, 1998, pp. 254-263. 
doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00121-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Stoffel, Y. Fagot-Révurat, A. Tejeda, B. Kierren, A. Nicolaou, P. Le Fèvre, F. Bertran, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi and D. Malterre, “Electron-phonon Coupling on Strained Ge/Si(111)-(5 × 5) Surfaces,” Physical Review B, Vol. 86, No. 19, 2012, pp. 195438-1-195438-7. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195438</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. -J. Gossmann, J. C. Bean, L. C. Feldman, E. G. McRae and I. K. Robinson, “7 × 7 Reconstruction of Ge(111) Surfaces under Compressive Strain,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 55, No. 10, 1985, pp. 1106-1109.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U. K&amp;#246hler, O. Jusko, G. Pietsch, B. Müller and M. Henzler, “Strained-Layer Growth and Islanding of Germanium on Si(111)-(7 × 7) Studied with STM,” Surface Science, Vol. 248, No. 3, 1991, pp. 321-331. 
doi:10.1016/0039-6028(91)91178-Z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. N. Romanyuk, A. A. Shklyaev, B. Z. Olshanetsky and A. V. Latyshev, “Formation of Ge Clusters at a Si(111)-Bi-√3 × √3 Surface,” JETP Letters, Vol. 93, No. 11, 2011, pp. 661-666. doi:10.1134/S0021364011110105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Vastola, V. B. Shenoy, J. Guo and Y.-W. Zhang, “Coupled Evolution of Composition and Morphology in a Faceted Three-Dimensional Quantum Dot,” Physical Review B, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2011, pp. 035432-1-035432-7. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.035432</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Laracuente, S. C. Erwin and L. J. Whitman, “Structure of Ge(113): Origin and Stability of Surface Self-Interstitials,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, No. 23, 1998, pp. 5177-5180. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Gai, R. G. Zhao, X. Li and W. S. Yang, “Faceting and Nanoscale Faceting of Ge(hhl) Surfaces around (113),” Physical Review B, Vol. 58, No. 8, 1998, pp. 4572-4578. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.4572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Stekolnikov and F. Bechstedt, “Shape of Free and Constrained Group-IV Crystallites: Influence of Surface Energies,” Physical Review B, Vol. 72, No. 12, 2005, p. 125326. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. T. Robinson, A. Rastelli, O. Schmidt and O. D. Dubon, “Global Faceting Behavior of Strained Ge Islands on Si,” Nanotechnology, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2009, Article ID: 085708. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085708</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev, K. N. Romanyuk, A. V. Latyshev and A. V. Arzhannikov, “Effect of Dislocations on the Shape of Islands during Silicon Growth on the Oxidized Si(111) Surface,” JETP Letters, Vol. 93, No. 6, 2011, pp. 442-445. 
doi:10.1134/S0021364011180147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Gai, R. G. Zhao, W. Li, Y. Fujikawa, T. Sakurai and W. S. Yang, “Major Stable Surface of Silicon: Si(20 4 23),” Physical Review B, Vol. 64, No. 12, 2001, Article ID: 125201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.64.125201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Henzler, “Correlation between Surface Structure and Surface States at the Clean Germanium (111) Surface,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 40, No. 9, 1969, pp. 3758-3765. doi:10.1063/1.1658268</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Z. Olshanetsky, S. M. Repinsky and A. A. Shklyaev, “LEED Investigation of Germanium Surfaces Cleaned by Sulphide Films, Structural Transitions on Clean Ge(110) Surfaces,” Surface Science, Vol. 64, No. 1, 1977, pp. 224-236. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(77)90268-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kuzmin, M. J. P. Punkkinen, P. Laukkanen, J. J. K. Lang, J. Dahl, V. Tuominen, M. Tuominen, R. E. Per&amp;#228l&amp;#228, T. Balasubramanian, J. Adell, B. Johansson, L. Vitos, K. Kokko and I. J. V&amp;#228yrynen, “Surface Core-Level Shifts on Ge (111)-c(2 × 8): Experiment and Theory,” Physical Review B, Vol. 83, No. 24, 2011, p. 245319. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.245319</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Henzler, “The Roughness of Cleaved Semiconductor Surfaces,” Surface Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1973, pp. 109-122. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(73)90249-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Z. Olshanetsky, S. M. Repinsky and A. A. Shklyaev, “LEED Studies of Vicinal Surfaces of Germanium,” Surface Science, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1977, pp. 205-217. 
doi:10.1016/0039-6028(77)90169-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Shklyaev and M. Ichikawa, “Effect of Interfaces on Quantum Confinement in Ge Dots Grown on Si Surfaces with a SiO2 Coverage,” Surface Science, Vol. 514, No. 1-3, 2002, pp. 19-26.  
doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(02)01602-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Copel, M. C. Reuter, M. Horn von Hoegen and R. M. Tromp, “Influence of Surfactants in Ge and Si Epitaxy on Si (001),” Physical Review B, Vol. 42, No. 18, 1990, pp. 11682-11689. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.42.11682</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Voigtlander, A. Zinner, T. Weber and H. P. Bonzel, “Modification of Growth Kinetics in Surfactant-Mediated Epitaxy,” Physical Review B, Vol. 51, No. 12, 1995, pp. 7583-7591. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.51.7583</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.34222-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Kandel and E. Kaxiras, “Surfactant Mediated Crystal Growth of Semiconductors,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 75, No. 14, 1995, pp. 2742-2745.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2742</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>