<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2013.33020</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-33927</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physiographic-Tectonic Zoning of Iran’s Sedimentary Basins
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ehran</surname><given-names>Arian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Geology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mehranarian@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>07</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>169</fpage><lpage>177</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Base on geological history evaluation using regional stratigraphy, sedimentary environments, magmatic activities, metamorphism and structural trend in Iran, physiographic-tectonic zoning map of Iran’s sedimentary basins has prepared. This map has prepared to point out the basement tectonics role in Iran. It contains twenty-four different provinces. Iran has composed from different plates: Arabian plate in south and west, Cimmerian manipulated in north and east, Eurasian plate in northeast margin. Cimmerian manipulated at least can be divided to the smaller part, East-Central Iran and North-Central Iran microcontinents. There are evidences for thick-skinned tectonics in the border zones of these plates and microcontinents, especially in Sanandaj-Sirjan overthrust belts that it formed by crustal stacking wedges. Also, Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic Tectonic column in the Arabian, Cimmerian and Eurasian plates under Iran Country area have introduced. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Physiographic; Tectonics; Plate; Iran; Microcontinents; Basin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The organization and development of the physiographictectonic provinces of Iran involves specifying the current structural geomorphology and tectonic history of Iran’s sedimentary basins that might have clear effect in the regions. A physiographic-tectonic province is a geological unit that it has a same history since sedimentation time to recent. Each physiographic-tectonic province has a same structural trend and dominant mechanism of deformation, because these have related to tectonic settings, magmatic histories, stratigraphic variations and deformational models of crust. So, physiographic-tectonic provinces can bind others. In this study, regional tectonics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref1">1</xref>] and geological data have integrated in together for preparation of the physiographic-tectonic zoning map of Iran’s sedimentary basins. The main steps in this study have summarized as follows:</p><p>1) Geological data such as regional stratigraphy, sedimentary environments, magmatic activities, metamorphism, tectonic stages and deformational styles that provided much information on the tectonic history have gathered from different references; 2) Physiographic-tectonic zoning map of Iran’s sedimentary basins based on sedimentary basins position has identified. These basins described by some researchers [2-4]; 3) Structural units have limited for each individual physiographic-tectonic province based on different works such as [5-8]; 4) Tectonic units have limited for each individual identified plate and microcontinents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) based on [9,10].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Structural Zoning of Iran</title><p>At the first time, a geologist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref5">5</xref>] has provided structural history and tectonics for Iran and then, geology of Iran has compiled by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref2">2</xref>]. Investigation in geology of Iran shows there are many different structural units. Iran is one of the most deformed areas of the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt.</p><p>The structural provinces of Iran have studied by several researchers but in this study, a new Physiographictectonic zoning map of sedimentary basins (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) base on updated data has proposed. The boundaries of the provinces have established through considering of geological materials, structural styles, tectonic settings, major faults and physiographic divisions.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Physiographic-Tectonic Provinces</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Zagros-East Taurus Hinterland</title><p>Dominant structural trends in Zagros province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) are NW-SE in northwestern part and E-W in southeastern</p><p>part. From tectonics view, it contains the overthrust and simple fold belts of Zagros that formed on the northeastern part of Arabian plate’s passive margin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Zagros Mountains have continued to East Taurus Mountains in Turkey and have named Zagros-East Taurus hinterland. Zagros-East Taurus hinterland is external platform (fold and thrust belt) of north margin of Arabian Craton (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Vergence of folding in this hinterland is toward south and southwest.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Persian Gulf-Mesopotamian Foreland Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Persian Gulf foreland basin province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains the south margin of simple fold belts of Zagros that formed on the northeastern part of Arabian plate’s passive margin. Persian Gulf has continued to end of Mesopotamian area in central Iraq and have named Persian Gulf-Mesopotamian foreland basin. Persian GulfMesopotamian foreland basin is north margin of internal platform of north margin of Arabian craton (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Makran Accretionary Prism</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Makran province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is E-W. From tectonics view, it contains the accretionary prism on trench of Oman sea subduction that has continued to Pakistan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Makran accretionary prism has 150 (Iran) to 350 (Pakistan) Km width that its north</p><p>part uplifted and formed Makran range.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Bashagard Mountains</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Bashagard province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is E-W. From tectonics view, it contains upper slope part of Makran accretionary prism that has terminated to East Iran Mountain belt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Bashagard province is a sign for bending zone of Arabian oceanic lithosphere.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Jazmorian-Mashkel fore Arc Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Jazmorian province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is E-W. From tectonics view, it contains a fore arc basin (Jazmorian plain) that has continued to Mashkel plain in Pakistan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Jazmorian-Mashkel fore arc basin has formed on south margin of East-Central Iran microcontinent and filled by Paleogene Turbidities and Neogene-Quaternary terrestrial sediments. Note that low seismicity in Makran and Jazmorian provinces has related to slow subduction rate and steeper dip of Benioff zone. Current subduction rate of oceanic crust (related to late Cretaceous) is 19 millimeters per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref11">11</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Shahsavaran-Soltan Magmatic Arc</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Shahsavaran-Soltan province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is E-W. From tectonics view, it contains an active magmatic arc that has continued to northeast in Pakistan. Shahsavaran-Soltan magmatic arc has formed on south margin of East-Central Iran microcontinent and it contains 16 Quaternary eruptive centers with 450 km length.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. South Lut-Helmand Back Arc Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in South Lut province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is E-W. From tectonics view, it contains a retro arc back arc basin that has continued to Helmand plain in Pakistan. South Lut-Helmand back arc basin has formed on south part of East-Central Iran microcontinent and it contains 2 Km Tertiary volcanic rocks eruptive centers with 450 km length.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. East Iran Mountain Belt</title><p>Dominant structural trend in East Iran province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is N-S. From tectonics view, it contains the magmatic arc and its accretionary prism belt that is result of westward subduction of west Afghanistan microcontinent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) beneath to East-Central Iran microcontinent.</p><p>Therefore, East Iran province has named Sistan or East Iran suture zone too. Recently, a dextral transpression zone (Nehbandan fault system) has developed on the eastern border of this province that it marked by horsetail splays on the northern and southern terminations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. West-Central Alborz and Lesser Caucasus Hinterland</title><p>Dominant structural trend in West-Central Alborz and lesser Caucasus province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains deformed zone (fold and thrust belt) of Cimmerian miniplate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) that formed in northern active margin until late Triassic. Then it has rifted by tension in a back arc basin of Neotethyian subduction zone in the south margin of Cimmerian miniplate. Development of that rift stopped in the late Cretaceous and then, renewed in the Eocene by spreading in submarine arc basin of Neotethyian subduction zone. In the other word, this hinterland is result of a magmatic arc system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref12">12</xref>] spreading in the evolutional back arc basin. After that, West-Central Alborz and lesser Caucasus hinterland has formed by deformation and regional uplift from SW part of Caspian Sea to Black sea.</p><p>Recently, Damavand and Sebalan cones have formed by late volcanism that related to final subduction of oceanic slab in south Caspian basin toward south and southwest. Five dominant orogenic phases and four deformational events in Alborz Mountain building processes have suggested by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>The first deformational event is one from the Syn-collision type between Cimmerian and Eurasian plates (late Triassic) and the other ones are from post-collision deformational events and in with the deformational of sedimentary cover which is result of shortening and increasing the thickness of passive continental crust in north of Cimmerian miniplate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_10"><title>3.10. Great Kavir-Northern Urmieh Lake Foreland Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Great Kavir-Northern Urmieh lake province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains the southern foreland basin of WestCentral Alborz and lesser Caucasus hinterland in the north margin of Cimmerian miniplate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) since late Eocene.</p><p>Also, this foreland basin in Pishva (Varamin) is a piggyback basin that formed on thrust sheets. In Tehran area, this basin is a deformed basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref14">14</xref>] by active thrusting in footwall of North Tehran fault.</p></sec><sec id="s3_11"><title>3.11. South Great Kavir Fold and Thrust Belt</title><p>Dominant structural trend in South Great Kavir fold and thrust belt province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NE-SW. From tectonics view, it contains fold and thrust belt that formed on the south margin of North-Central Iran microcontinent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This belt have deformed by collision of NW part of East-Central Iran microcontinent with North-Central Iran microcontinent, on the passive margin setting. South Great Kavir fold and thrust belt is a peneplain like area by extensive erosion.</p></sec><sec id="s3_12"><title>3.12. South Caspian-Black Sea Foreland Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in South Caspian-Black sea foreland basin province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains the northern foreland basin of West-Central Alborz and lesser Caucasus hinterland in the south margin of Eurasian plate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) since late Eocene. Although, median part of South Caspian and Black sea basin has uplifted by collision between Eurasian and Cimmerian plates.</p></sec><sec id="s3_13"><title>3.13. Urmieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Urmieh-Dokhtar province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains a magmatic arc that is result of subduction to beneath of southern active continental margin of Cimmerian plate. Also, Sahand and other cones (about 9) in lesser Caucasus hinterland are result of quaternary magmatism in this zone that it has marked by widespread Eocene volcanism. Urmieh-Dokhtar province has continued to south of Black Sea and Its width has increased from Naien city that many parts have covered by quaternary deposits of Dagh Sorkh Kavir, Southern Urmieh Lake, Namak and Hoz-e Soltan Lakes have formed on it. So, there are a few backland basins with Playa type sedimentation because of dip decreasing in Ben off zone (in NW part of magmatic arc). SE part of magmatic arc has formed on southwest margin of East-Central Iran microcontinent.</p></sec><sec id="s3_14"><title>3.14. Naien-Kerman Retro Arc Foreland Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Naien-Kerman province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains a retro arc foreland basin on the north margin of UrmiehDokhtar magmatic arc (SE part). Davaran Mountain and Bafgh-Baghin fault system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref15">15</xref>] have developed in this province that formed on southwest part of East-Central Iran microcontinent.</p></sec><sec id="s3_15"><title>3.15. Sanandaj-Sirjan Overthrust Belts</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Sanandaj-Sirjan province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains Sanandaj-Sirjan overthrust belts that formed by metamorphic rocks of the northeastern part of Arabian plate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref8">8</xref>]. This province has continued to the north part of Dead Sea fault in the south Turkey. Late Cretaceous-Paleogene sequences in this belt have piled up on a wedge top part [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref16">16</xref>] of Zagros proforeland basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref17">17</xref>], before regional metamorphism. Recently, pre-Cretaceous deformed and metamorphic rocks have exposed in this province by upthrusting of basement wedges (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Quaternary basins such as southern margin of Urmieh Lake, Kabodarahang depression, Mighan Kavir, Gavkhoni depression, Abarkuh Kavir, Marvast Kavir and Sirjan’s Kavir-e Namak, on the north boundary of this province with Urmieh-Dokhtar are the index cases from Supra-Arc troughs. These basins are significant in marking loss of the fore-arc basin beneath back-thrusts antithetic to the subduction direction and can explain the presence of younger molasse in a setting referred to as a suture zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref19">19</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_16"><title>3.16. East Alborz or Binalod Hinterland</title><p>Dominant structural trend in East Alborz province (Fig-</p><p>ure 2) is NW-SE in eastern part and NE-SW in western part. From tectonics view, it contains Binalod magmatic arc and its fore arc basin with volcanic activities (especially in Silurian) on northeastern of Cimmerian miniplate. Obduction of Mashhad ophiolite during late Paleozoic has result of subduction into beneath this province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) but marine sedimentation on Kopet Dagh proforeland basin (Over thinned crust of south Eurasian plate) has continued to Eocene. Also, East Alborz fore arc basin gradually uplifted and it has formed a hinterland with SW vergence.</p></sec><sec id="s3_17"><title>3.17. Torbat-e Jam-Neyshabour Retroarc Foreland Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Torbat-e Jam-Neyshabour province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE in eastern part and NESW in western part. From tectonics view, it contains the Torbat-e Jam-Neyshabour retro arc foreland basin on northeastern part of North-Central Iran microcontinent.</p><p>A magmatic arc has formed on north and parallels to this province that it has underthrusted beneath East Alborz province since Paleogene. Torbat-e Jam-Neyshabour retro arc foreland basin has filled by erosion of that magmatic arc.</p></sec><sec id="s3_18"><title>3.18. Kopet Dagh Hinterland</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Kopet Dagh province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE. From tectonics view, it contains the Kopet Dagh hinterland or Kopet Dagh fold and thrust belt that formed in passive margin of Eurasian plate until late Triassic and then marine sedimentation on Kopet Dagh proforeland basin has continued to Eocene.</p><p>Kopet Dagh hinterland has uplifted related to Karakorum foreland basin in northeast along Eshghabad fault.</p></sec><sec id="s3_19"><title>3.19. South Caspian Remnant Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in South Caspian province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE in eastern part and N-S in western part. From tectonics view, it contains the South Caspian remnant oceanic basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref21">21</xref>] and northern foreland basin of Central Alborz hinterland.</p><p>Therefore it is a hybrid basin over an old island arc that it has formed by southward Paleotethyan intraoceanic subduction. This province is subducting beneath to Apsheron-Sill ridge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref22">22</xref>] on north boundary of South Caspian now [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref23">23</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_20"><title>3.20. Maiamay-Taibad Inverted Back Arc Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Great Kavir-Taibad province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE in eastern part and NE-SW in western part. From tectonics view, it contains the Maiamay-Taibad marginal back arc basin with Sabezevar Ophiolites and Torbat-e Heydarieh volcanic rocks that inverted in paleogene.</p></sec><sec id="s3_21"><title>3.21. Khaf-Kavir Plain Magmatic Arc</title><p>Dominant structural trend in Khaf-Bardeskan province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is NW-SE in the eastern part and NE-SW in the western part. From tectonics view, it contains the northern active margin of East-Central Iran microcontinent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It has formed by southward subduction of oceanic lithosphere (under Maiamay-Taibad marginal back arc basin) that named Sabzevar Ocean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref24">24</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_22"><title>3.22. Lut Plain-Gonabad Back Arc Basin</title><p>Lut Plain-Gonabad back arc basin on the Lut microcontinent (eastern portion of East-Central microcontinent) has placed on the west of East Iran Mountain belt.</p><p>Dominant structural trend in East-Central Iran province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is N-S. From tectonics view, it contains back arc (retro arc) basin that it has related to westward subduction of west Afghanistan microcontinent beneath to East-Central Iran microcontinent. Recently, horsetail splays in northern termination of Nehbandan fault system have developed in the northern part of this province.</p></sec><sec id="s3_23"><title>3.23. Tabas Hinterland</title><p>Dominant structural trend in East-Central Iran province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is N-S. From tectonics view, it contains an ancient island arc on the west of the Lut Plain-Gonabad province that it has accreted to this along Nayband fault system (western border of the Lut microcontinent) by eastward subduction in Pre-Cambrian.</p></sec><sec id="s3_24"><title>3.24. Yazd-Khour Piggy Back Basin</title><p>Dominant structural trend in East-Central Iran province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is N-S. From tectonics view, it contains a few ancient island arcs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref25">25</xref>] that they have accreted together by eastward subductions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref6">6</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Tectonic Column of Iran</title><p>Iran has composed from different plates: Arabian plate in south and west, Cimmerian manipulated in north and east, Eurasian plate in northeast margin.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Arabian Plate</title><sec id="s4_1_1"><title>4.1.1. Zagros Orogen</title><p>Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic Tectonic column in Zagros province under Iran country area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) are at least contain 5 tectonic stages between 4 below events:</p><p>1) Compressive event of late proterozoic (Pan African orogeny); 2) Tensional event of Infra-Cambrian; 3) Tensional event of Triassic; 4) Compressive event of Neogene (Zagrosian orogeny). Two above tensional events are related to regional rifting that it occurred next to the Gondwana drift. In global scale, they are approximately equivalent to movements of Caledonian and Hercynian orogenies, but in this period the Zagros basin have been formed a broad passive margin on the northeastern part of Afro-Arabian plate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_2"><title>4.1.2. Persian Gulf Basin</title><p>Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic Tectonic column in Persian Gulf foreland basin province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) are at least contain 4 tectonic stages between 3 below events:</p><p>1) Compressive event of late proterozoic (Pan African orogeny); 2) Tensional event of Infra-Cambrian; 3) Tensional event of Triassic.</p><p>Compressive event of Neogene (Zagrosian orogeny) has not recorded in this province until recent. Similar to</p><p>the Zagros province, two above tensional events are related to regional rifting that it marked by some sedimentary gaps such as Carboniferous sequences.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Cimmerian Miniplate</title><p>Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic Tectonic column in Cimmerian miniplate under Iran country area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) are at least contain 8 tectonic stages between 7 below events:</p><p>1) Compressive event of late proterozoic (Pan African orogeny); 2) Tensional event of Infra-Cambrian-Late Paleozoic (equivalent to movements of Caledonian and Hercynian orogenies) that it has marked by some sedimentary gaps such as in lower Paleozoic and Carboniferous sequences on the Alborz basin; 3) Compressive event of late Triassic (Early Cimmerian orogeny); 4) Tensional event of Late Jurassic; 5) Compressive event of Late early Alpine orogeny; 6) Tensional event of the Middle Alpine orogeny; 7) Compressive event of the Late Alpine orogeny.</p><p>Two later tensional events are related to back arc spreading (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) that it has been inverted by consequence compressive events.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Eurasian Plate</title><p>Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic Tectonic column in Eurasian plate under Iran country area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) are at least contain 5 tectonic stages between 4 below events:</p><p>1) Compressive event of late proterozoic (Cadomian orogeny); 2) Compressive event of Late Paleozoic (Hercynian orogeny); 3) Compressive event of late Triassic (Early Cimmerian orogeny); 4) Compressive event of the Late Alpine orogeny.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>Geological history evaluation using regional stratigraphy, sedimentary environments, magmatic activities, metamorphism and structural trend in Iran are showing that it contains twenty four different provinces.</p><p>There are much evidence for three main continentcontinent collision such as magmatic arcs, ophiolitic sequences, orogenic belts and them foreland basins. The first one is along northern boundary of Binalod (16) and West-Central Alborz and lesser Caucasus (9) provinces that it known as Paleotethyan suture zone.</p><p>The second continent-continent collision zone is along northern boundary of Sanandaj-Sirjan province (15) that it known as Neotethyan suture zone and it has formed on the top of the crustal stacking wedges. The third continent-continent collision zone is along eastern boundary of Lut Plain-Gonabad province (22) that it known as mezotethyan suture zone. Base on gravimetric survey of Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33927-ref26">26</xref>], all of them have thick-skinned tectonics.</p><p>Also, there are some evidence for an ocean-continent covergence such as Makran accretionary prism (province No. 3), Jazmorian-Mashkel fore arc basin, (province No. 5), Shahsavaran-Soltan magmatic arc (province No. 6), South Lut-South Helmand back arc basin (province No. 7).</p><p>The Paleotethyan and Neotethyan suture zones have same orientations (NW-SE) from median part of Iran toward west and so, four different mountain ranges have formed.</p><p>They are the most parts of Zagros-East Taurus hinterland with deformed sedimentary rocks (province No. 1), West-Central Alborz and lesser Caucasus hinterland with deformed volcano-sedimentary rocks (province No. 9), Urmieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (province No. 13) and Sanandaj-Sirjan overthrust belt with deformed metamorphic rocks (province No. 15).</p><p>These have formed a broad mountain chain with more than 1200 km length and 400 km width from the southern part of Caspian sea to Black sea. Four above mountains have different ages, basements, structural styles and rocks, thus it seem that they can consider as Iranian Cordillera.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>Physiographic-tectonic zoning map of Iran’s sedimentary basins has prepared to indicate basement tectonics role in Iran. Characteristic of this zoning map are as follows:</p><p>The map has intended as a pattern for the assessment of the structural trends in Iran.</p><p>• Cimmerian miniplate at least can be divided to the smaller part, East-Central Iran and North-Central Iran microcontinents.</p><p>• Zagros and Alborz hinterlands and border zones of East-Central Iran microcontinent have thick-skinned tectonics.</p><p>• Sanandaj-Sirjan province has formed on the crustal stacking wedges of Arabian plate.</p><p>• East Alborz orogeny is the oldest mountain building Iran.</p><p>• Tectonic events of Paleozoic (equivalent to movements of Caledonian and Hercynian orogenies) in the most part of Iran have a tensional role and they have marked by long sedimentary gaps.</p><p>• Paleozoic sedimentary gaps are related to block faulting in rifted region.</p><p>• Iran country has composed from four mountain ranges that they can consider as Iranian Cordillera.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work has funded by the Department of geology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran, Iran. Also, Special thanks to vice-president for research in Science and Research branch, Tehran.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.33927-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Qorashi and M. Arian, “Tectonics of Iran,” Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 2011, 336p. (In Persian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. H. Nabavi, “An Introduction to Geology of Iran,” Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 1976, 109p. (In Persian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Eftekharnezhad, “Division of Different Part of Iran Base on Structural Position in Related to Sedimentary Basins,” Journal of Iranian Petroleum Association, Vol. 82, No. 1, 1980, pp. 19-28. (In Persian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. A. Aghanabati, “Geology of Iran,” Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 2001, 586p. (In Persian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Stocklin, “Structural History and Tectonics of Iran: A Review,” AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 7, 1968, pp. 1229-1258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Berberian, “Structural Evolution of the Iranian Plateau,” Contribution to the Seismotectonics of Iran (Part IV), Report No. 52, Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 1981, pp. 19-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. A. Nogole Sadat, “Tectonic Map of Iran,” Treatise on the Geology of Iran, Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 1993</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Alavi, “Tectonics of the Zagros Orogenic Belt of Iran: New Date and Interpretations,” Tectonophysics, Vol. 229, No. 3-4, 1994, pp. 211-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Alavi, “Tectonic map of the Middle East, 1:5000000,” Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Arian, “Basement Tectonics and Geology of Iran,” Asar Nafis Press, Qum, 2011, 300p. (In Persian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Vernant, F. Nilforoushan, D. Hatzfeld, M. R. Abbasi, C. Vigny, F. Masson, H. Nankali, J. Martinod, A. Ashtiani, R. Bayer, F. Tavakoli and J. Chery, “Present-Day crustal Deformation and Plate Kinematics in the Middle East Constrained by GPS Measurements in Iran and Northern Oman,” Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 157, No. 1, 2004, pp. 381-398.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Alavi, “Tectonostratigraphic Synthesis and Structural Style of the Alborz Mountain System in Northern Iran,” Journal of Geodynamics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1996, pp. 1-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Arian, Z. Maleki and H. Noroozpour, “Cenozoic Diastrophism and Deformational Events in the East-Central Alborz,” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, Vol. 1, No. 11, 2011, pp. 2394-2400.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. Miall, “Collision-Related Foreland Basins,” In: C. J. Busby and R. V. Ingersoll, Eds., Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1995, pp. 393-424.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Arian, M. Pourkermani, A. Sistanipour and H. Noroozpour, “Kinematic Significance of Fold- and Fault-Related Fracture Systems in the Rafsanjan’s Northeast Highlands (Central Iran),” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, Vol. 1, No. 12, 2011, pp. 3398-3406.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. G. De Celles and K. A. Giles, “Foreland Basin System,” Basin Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1996, pp. 105-123.  
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2117.1996.01491.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Alavi, “Regional Stratigraphy of the Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt of Iran and Its Proforeland Evolution,” American Journal of Science, Vol. 304, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Giese, J. Makris, B. Akashe, P. Roewer, H. Letz and M. M. Mostaanpour, “Seismic Crustal Studies in Southern Iran between the Central Zagros Belt,” Geologic Survey of Iran, Vol. 1, No. 51, 1983, pp. 71-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. H. G. Mitchell and H. G. Reading, “Sedimentation and Tectonics,” In: H. G. Reading, Ed., Sedimentary Environments and Facies, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1986, pp. 471-519.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. J. W. Rogers and M. Santosh, “Continents and Supercontinents,” Oxford University Press, Inc., Oxford, 2006, 289p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Berberian, “Southern Caspian: A Compressional Depression Floored by a Trapped, Modified Oceanic Crust,” Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1983, pp. 163-183. doi:10.1139/e83-015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. A. Jackson, K. Priestley, M. Allen and M. Berberian, “Active Tectonics of the South Caspian Basin,” Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 148, No. 2, 2002, pp. 214-245.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. L. Allen, J. Jackson and R. Walker, “Late Cenozoic Reorganization of the Arabia-Eurasia Collision and the Comparison of Short-Term and Long-Term Deformation Rates,” Tectonics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2004, Article ID: TC 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. C. Sengor, “A New Model for the Late Palaezoic-Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution of Iran and Implication for Oman,” In: A. H. F. Robertson, M. P. Searle and A. C. Ries, Eds., The Geology and Tectonics of the Oman Region, No. 46, Geological Society Special Publications, London, 1990, pp. 797-831.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Stocklin, “Structural Correlation of the Alpine Ranges between Iran and Central Asia,” Société géologique de France, Paris, Mémoire Hors Série, Vol. 1, No. 8, 1977, pp. 333-353.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33927-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. A. Dehghani and J. Makris, “The Gravity Field and Crustal Structure of Iran,” Report No. 51, Geologic Survey of Iran, Tehran, 1983, pp. 51-68.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>