<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Medical Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3372</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmm.2013.32015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMM-33291</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Honey a Natural Sweetener with Several Medicinal Properties on the Attributes of a Frozen Dessert Containing the Probiotic &lt;i&gt;Lactobacillus acidophilus&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>bigail</surname><given-names>Greenbaum</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kayanush</surname><given-names>J. Aryana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Animal Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Food Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>karyana@agcenter.lsu.edu(KJA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>06</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>September</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Lactobacillus
   acidophilus has several health advantages. Honey has several medicinal properties and is also a natural sweetener which could be used in frozen desserts. There are various types of honey based on color namely, light, amber and dark. Influence of honey on attributes of a probiotic frozen dessert is not known. The objective was to study the effect of light, amber colored and dark honey on the Lactobacillus acidophilus counts and quality attributes of probiotic ice cream. Ice creams were manufactured with use of Lactobacillus acidophilus at 50 g of frozen culture concentrate per 7.75 liters of ice cream mix and with the use of light or amber or dark honey individually. Control had no honey and was sweetened with sugar. Use of honey increased Lactobacillus acidophilus
   
  counts and viscosity, while decreased pH and melt down volume. Light honey ice cream had flavor and appearance scores comparable to the control vanilla ice cream. Light honey can be recommended for the manufacturing Lactobacillus acidophilus probiotic ice creams thus having a frozen dessert with the health advantageous medicinal properties of honey.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Probiotic; Health; Dessert; Honey</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In ancient times honey has been used for the treatment of a variety of illnesses such as gastric disturbances, ulcers, wounds and burns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref1">1</xref>]. For these treatments honey has either been ingested or topically applied. Honey is reported to have antiseptic properties hence also used for fighting infections in wounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref2">2</xref>]. There are several reported mechanisms by which honey has antibacterial action namely, bee defensing-1, methylglyoxal (MGO), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, osmotic effect and pH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Honey is also reported to have antioxidants which reduce the damage done to the colon in colitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref4">4</xref>] and antioxidants play a big role in prevention of cancer and heart disease. Darker the honey more is the level of antioxidants. Based on color shades, there are three distinct types of honey, light, amber and dark. Honey has also been reported to increase the counts of probiotics namely bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the colon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Lactobacillus acidophilus is probiotic (good helpful) bacterium with several health advantages. The health benefits of Lactobacillus acidophilus are as follows, assists in lowering cholesterol, reduces occurrence of diarrhea in humans (children and adults), provides immune support for infections or cancer, provides a healthy replacement of good bacteria in the intestinal tract following antibiotic therapy, improves the symptoms of lactose intolerance which is very important in dairy product consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref6">6</xref>]. Antitumor effect of L. acidophilus was reported earlier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref7">7</xref>]. Oral dietary supplements containing viable cells of L. acidophilus decreased azoreductase, β- glucuronidase, and nitroreductase, bacterial enzymes which catalyze conversion of procarcinogens to carcinogens. Anticarcinogenic effect of L. acidophilus may be due to direct removal of procarcinogens and activation of the body’s immune system. Dietary supplementation with L. acidophilus decreases the number of colon cancer cells in rats in a dose dependent manner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Ice cream is a very popular dairy dessert which is typically sweetened by sugar. If honey is used as a sweetening source in the manufacture of a probiotic ice cream, it is not known what effect honey would have on the characteristics of a healthier probiotic ice cream. The objective was to study the effect of light, amber colored and dark honey on the Lactobacillus acidophilus counts and quality attributes of probiotic ice cream.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Ice Cream Manufacture</title><p>Ice creams of vanilla flavor were manufactured according to Aryana et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref9">9</xref>] and Aryana and Summers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref10">10</xref>] with slight modification that sugar was replaced with honey and the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus acidophiluswas incorporated into all pasteurized and cooled ice cream mixes at the rate of 50 g of frozen culture concentrate per 7.75 liters of ice cream mix. Treatments were light, amber colored and dark honeys which were randomly assigned to the experimental unit, the milk lot. The control had no honey and was sweetened with sugar. Product manufacture was replicated three times.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Lactobacillus acidophilus Counts</title><p>Enumerations were conducted according to Aryana et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref11">11</xref>]. The MRS sorbitol agar was used. MRS base medium was made on a one liter basis without dextrose as follows. Proteose peptone #3(United States Biological, Swampscott, MA), 10.0 g, 10.0 g of beef extract (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD), 5.0 g of yeast extract (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD), 1.0 g of polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO), 2.0 g of ammonium citrate (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), 5.0 g of sodium acetate, anhydrous (EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibbstown, NJ), 0.1 g of magnesium sulfate, anhydrous (EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibbstown, NJ), 0.05 g of manganese sulfate, monohydrate (SigmaAldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO), 2.0 g of dipotassium phosphate (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), and 15.0 g of agar (EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibbstown, NJ) and diluting these ingredients to the appropriate proportion of 1 L with distilled water. This mixture was heated to boiling with agitation before autoclaving at 121˚C for 15 min. A 10% (w/v) sorbitol (EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibbstown, NJ) solution was prepared and filtered sterilized with Nalgene Membrane Filter Units (Nalge Co., Rochester, NY), and the appropriate amount of this solution was aseptically added to the MRS base medium to form a 10% sorbitol solution (final concentration of 1% sorbitol i.e. 1 g sorbitol in 100 mL of final medium) and 90% MRS base medium mixture immediately before pouring the plates. The appropriate dilutions of ice cream were made with 99 mL of sterilized peptone (or sterilized Butterfield buffer in pre-filled dilution bottles (Weber Scientific, Hamilton, NJ)). Petri dishes were placed in BBL GasPaks (BBL, Becton, Dickinson and Co., CockeysvilleMD) and incubated anaerobically at 37˚C for 72 h. A Quebec Darkfield Colony Counter (Leica Inc., Buffalo, NY) was used to assist in enumerating the colonies. Small, rough, brownish, dull, colonies of 0.1 to 0.5 mm in diameter were counted. Lactobacillus acidophilus pure culture was also plated on MRS-sorbitol agar alongside the samples for visual comparison of colony morphology. Three replications were conducted.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. pH</title><p>The pH was determined using an Orion pH meter model 250 A/610 (Fisher Scientific, Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA) calibrated using commercial pH 4.00 and 7.00 buffers (Fisher Scientific). The pH determinations of ice cream mixes were made at 8˚C. The pH determinations were in duplicate. Three replications were conducted</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Meltdown</title><p>A 100 g scoop of ice cream was placed on a wire gauge (6 wires/cm<sup>2</sup>) at 22 C. Melted ice cream drained from the gauge was collected in a graduated cylinder. The volume collected in first hour was recorded. Three replications were conducted.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Apparent Viscosity</title><p>Ice cream mix apparent viscosities were determined at 8˚C using a Brookfield DV II+ viscometer (Brookfield Engineering Lab Inc, Stoughton, MA) with a helipath stand. An RV #2 spindle was used at 50 rpm. The data were acquired using the Wingather software (Brookfield). A hundred data points were averaged per replication. Three replications were conducted.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Sensory Evaluation</title><p>Sensory evaluations were conducted by a seven member experienced panel on the ice creams coded with three digit random number codes. The official American Dairy Science Association Intercollegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest Score Card for flavor with a 10 point scale (10 = no criticism) and for appearance with a 5 point scale (5 = no criticism) were used. Three replications were conducted.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed by Analysis of Variance using the “Proc mixed” linear model procedure of SAS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref12">12</xref>]. Means were separated using the least significant difference test. Significant differences were determined at α = 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Counts of Lactobacillus acidophilus as influenced by the different types of honey are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The L. acidophilus counts of ice creams with honey were significantly higher than the control. The L. acidophilus counts with the honey were at least 10<sup>7</sup> cfu/mL which is desirable for a probiotic to have the probiotic effect upon ingestion. The L. acidophilus counts with Amber and Dark honey were significantly higher than the Light honey. Honey is supposed to have an antimicrobial property because of its osmotic effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref13">13</xref>] as honey has low water activity. As regards to the composition of fluid milk, fluid milk has 87% water. This water contained in fluid milk used in ice cream manufacture may have resulted in the loss of the low water activity of honey hence no longer behaving as an antimicrobial, allowing L. acidophilus to grow.</p><p>The pH of ice cream mixes as influenced by the different types of honey are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>The control had significantly the highest pH. Among the ice creams with honey, use of light honey resulted in significantly higher pH compared to dark honey. Honey usually has a pH between 3.2 - 4.5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33291-ref14">14</xref>] while fluid milk used to make ice cream had a pH of 6.8. Since there was no honey in the control to lower its pH, the pH of the control was higher compared to the treatments. Also, low pH of honey is one of the factors for controlling microbial growth. Since the pH of the ice cream mixes were not as low as pure honey, it did not negatively influence the L. acidophilus counts keeping them in the desirable 10<sup>7</sup> cfu’s/mL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Meltdown volumes in one hour of the various ice creams are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The ice creams with honey had significantly lower meltdown than the control. There were no significant differences in melt down among the light, amber or dark honey ice creams. Use of honey slowed the rate of meltdown which is desirable as consumers would not want their ice creams to melt rapidly.</p><p>Apparent viscosity values are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The control had significantly lower apparent viscosity compared to the ice creams with honey. Among the ice creams with honey there were no differences in apparent viscosity. Use of honey as a sweetener significantly increased the viscosity of the ice cream mixes. Honey is a viscous product and it imparted that viscosity to the ice cream mixes.</p><p>Flavor scores of ice creams made with different types of honey are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. There were no differences in flavor of the control and the ice creams made using light and amber honey. While the ice cream made using the dark honey had significantly lower flavor scores perhaps because the dark honey had the strongest flavor compared to the other honies.</p><p>Appearance scores are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. There were no differences in appearance among the control and the ice creams made with light honey. There were significantly lower scores with the use of Amber colored honey, while the use of the dark honey resulted in significantly the least scores. The dark color of the dark honey came through in the white vanilla ice cream making the vanilla ice creams off white, slightly greyish, which lowered the appearance scores.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Use of honey increased Lactobacillus acidophilus counts and viscosity, while decreased pH and melt down volume. Light honey ice cream had flavor and appearance scores comparable to the control vanilla ice cream. Light honey can be recommended for the manufacturing Lactobacil-</p><p>lus acidophilus probiotic ice creams thus having a frozen dessert with the health advantageous medicinal properties of honey.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.33291-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. C. Molan, “Honey for the Treatment of Infections,” The New Zealand Beekeeper, Vol. 216, No. 1, 1992, pp. 19-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. B. Grotte, “Honey as a Dressing for Wounds, Burns and Ulcers: A Brief Review of Clinical Reports and Experimental Studies,” 2012.  
http://www.drgrotte.com/honey-medicine.shtml</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. H. S. Kwakman, A. A. te Velde, L. Boer, D. Speijer, C. Vandenbroucke-Grauls and S. Zaat, “How Honey Kill Bacteria. Chapter 6 in Thrombocidins and Honey: Mechanisms of Action and Optimization of Antimicrobial Activity,” 2010. http://dare.uva.nl/document/175222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Bilsel, D. Bugra, S. Yamaner, T. Bulut, U. Cevikbas and U. Turkoglu, “Could Honey Have a Place in Colitis Therapy,” Digestive Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2002, pp. 306-312. doi:10.1159/000064580</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. E. El-Arab, S. M. Girgis, E. M. Hegazy and A. B. Abd El-Khalek, “Effect of Dietary Honey on Intestinal Microflora and Toxicity of Mycotoxins in Mice,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, BioMed Central Ltd., 2006. 
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6882-6-6.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. E. Sanders, “Consideration for Use of Probiotic Bacteria to Modulate Human Health,” Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 130, No. 2S, 2000, pp. 384S-390S.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. R. Goldin and S. L. Gorbach, “The Effect of Lactobacillus Feeding on Human Intestinal Bacterial Enzyme Activity,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 39, No. 5, 1984, pp. 756-761.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. V. Rao, M. E. Sanders, C. Indranie, B. Simi and B. S. Reddy, “Prevention of Colonic Preneoplastic Lesions by the Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFMTM in F344 Rats,” International Journal of Oncology, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1999, pp. 939-944.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. J. Aryana, D. Olson, A. Greenbaum and C. Boeneke, “Quality Characteristics of a Weight Loss Ice Cream,” Milk Science International, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2008, pp. 182-185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. J. Aryana and M. Summers, “Probiotic, Fat Free, No Sugar Added Ice-Cream,” Milk Science International, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2006, pp. 184-187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. J. Aryana, S. Pluche, R. M. Rao, P. McGrew and N. P. Shah, “Fat-Free Plain Yogurt Manufactured with Inulins of Various Chain Lengths and Lactobacillus acidophillus,” Journal of Food Science, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2007, pp. M79-M84. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00302.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Statistical Analysis Systems, “SAS Version 9.1,” SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. E. Lusby, A. Coombes and J. M. Wilkinson, “Honey: A Potent Agent for Wound Healing?” Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing: Official Publication of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society/WOCN, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2002, pp. 295-300.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33291-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waikato Honey Research Unit, “Honey as an Antimicrobial Agent,” 2006.  
http://bio.waikato.ac.nz/honey/honey_intro.shtml</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>