<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.46108</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-33083</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Out-of-Equilibrium Dissipative &lt;i&gt;ac&lt;/i&gt;—Susceptibility in Quantum Ising Spin Glass
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aetano</surname><given-names>Busiello</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Dipartimento di Fisica “E.R.Caianiello”, Università di Salerno, Fisciano-Salerno, Italy; 
CNISM-Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze Fisiche della Materia, Unità di Salerno, Salerno, Italy</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>busiello@sa.infn.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>784</fpage><lpage>790</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>February</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>March</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>April</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The imaginary part of the non-equilibrium magnetic susceptibility of Ising spin glass in a transverse field under time-dependent longitudinal external magnetic field has been calculated at very low temperature on the basis of quantum droplet model and quantum linear response theory. Quantum and aging effects on the low temperature dynamics of the model are discussed. A comparison with recent theoretical and experimental data in spin glass is made. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Spin Glasses; Non-Equilibrium Dynamics; Droplet Theory</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Over the last two decades there is a great deal of research on the experimental and theoretical description of disordered magnetic materials. The understanding of the interplay between disorder, quantum and thermal fluctuations remains among the most relevant problem of condensed matter physics. In strongly disordered systems the dynamics becomes very slow which is characteristic of glassy state and aging scenario [1-8]. Aging phenomena and non-equilibrium slow dynamics have been investigated during last years in many materials with glassy properties such as spin glasses [1-8], polymer glasses [9,10], gels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref11">11</xref>] and other areas like neural networks, information processing, optimization problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref12">12</xref>]. Despite a great progress towards the understanding of nonequilibrium dynamics, some problems remain open. One of them is an investigation of a very low temperature nonequilibrium dynamics in quantum spin glasses, namely the nature of quantum channels of relaxation, the behavior of quantum glassy system subjected to periodic driving force, aging at very low temperatures. The natural basis for the interpretation of aging is based on coarsening ideas of a slow domain growth of a spin-glass type ordered phase [8,13,14]. A large attention in the last decade was paid to the spin glasses representing a model systems for study of non-equilibrium dynamics providing a measure of processes causing the aging: the magnetic susceptibility [15-22].</p><p>In classical spin glasses in the ac susceptibility measurements the magnetic response of the system to a small oscillating magnetic field applied after quenching exhibits aging effects. This response depends on its thermal history and the time interval the system has been kept at a constant temperature in the glass phase [1-8,15-17].</p><p>It is assumed that isothermal aging of a d-dimensional spin glass is a coarsening process of domain walls, and the temporal ac susceptibility (real part <img src="12-7501194\3b23314c-f9b7-43e0-a9f4-00336222abfc.jpg" /> andimaginary part<img src="12-7501194\d14bf56a-702e-4edc-ac94-807a99b8e65a.jpg" />) at a given frequency of ac magnetic field ω&#160;at time t after the quenching scales as [23-25]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29724"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\f82b835a-09cc-4bbb-b06b-134d1fd593fa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29725"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\ef8aab0d-48fc-455e-b8ce-8a80d58c3350.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for<img src="12-7501194\7b3fa9c7-6387-41ea-8594-1972049cf88e.jpg" />, if <img src="12-7501194\b061c395-0ba8-4a29-a008-7f2078fc4a66.jpg" /> is proportional to <img src="12-7501194\de98f456-9983-448a-9ae2-6d8c8984309b.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7501194\93f5c0bc-2eab-4665-a5b1-723c73d4170f.jpg" /> is proportional to<img src="12-7501194\88ff27ec-5c62-4d8d-9a41-371870ba3274.jpg" />;<img src="12-7501194\9ad97a5b-d82a-4423-95c4-3012b43514f0.jpg" />. Here <img src="12-7501194\2fce27b4-c63d-4bed-9743-2aac67fb1c6f.jpg" /> is size of the droplet being polarized by oscillating field and <img src="12-7501194\97091816-1cea-4158-bbd7-dabbd4b37a81.jpg" /> is the typical domain size, <img src="12-7501194\f62842cb-00b1-4b12-a4e9-46e035546c2e.jpg" />and <img src="12-7501194\3cf3d394-57c6-410a-9bc5-cbe55461e70f.jpg" /> may scale according logarithmic growth law or algebraic one [23-25]. <img src="12-7501194\a64faaed-0dc3-4dbc-9983-f96778907fc8.jpg" />is proportional to <img src="12-7501194\2134e388-3bf2-430f-a63a-44848ca391c7.jpg" /> if droplet theory is used, <img src="12-7501194\9da7674e-e4d8-49c1-bada-79005ac453a0.jpg" /></p><p>is some exponent,<img src="12-7501194\c2e3ca2e-70db-4341-b45e-76fc0e72a66c.jpg" /> , and <img src="12-7501194\5f5f537a-35f8-4c69-a76e-7f8908b382b0.jpg" /> is a certainmicroscopic characteristic time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref26">26</xref>]. The logarithmic growth law (like the algebraic one) is supported by recent experiments [23-25]. The expressions (1) and (2) are found when relaxation is governed by thermal activation over a free energy barrier<img src="12-7501194\5b1fe982-a606-441d-b772-69170b4c6296.jpg" />. It is supposed that barriers for annihilation and creation of the droplet excitations scale as<img src="12-7501194\f8a49d74-8525-4239-8fad-082e543d422c.jpg" />, where <img src="12-7501194\27dc7f10-5d65-4d03-a262-670770dbf7d0.jpg" /> is a barrier energy at temperature <img src="12-7501194\0ee52e46-5843-49ae-ae34-cb70b71375f4.jpg" />(<img src="12-7501194\aed57bfa-1e4a-4f00-9362-8a88e4d13ce3.jpg" />is the spin glass transition temperature). The barriers have a broad distribution of energies. A droplet with barrier <img src="12-7501194\8c164f6c-934b-49e8-b4a6-4524ab4eca51.jpg" /> lasts for a time <img src="12-7501194\ae642db9-f8ab-4bde-8833-76046d90e547.jpg" /> of order of <img src="12-7501194\8a7140bc-5124-4d7e-89e5-23f44d4ce5dc.jpg" /> where <img src="12-7501194\11787fad-4636-420f-b712-a433a0e6afb6.jpg" /> is Boltzmann’s constant; here <img src="12-7501194\3e73975b-2269-427f-b802-753c081bcd3c.jpg" /> is a rate of classic activation over energy barrier<img src="12-7501194\4333f964-b5a2-4270-8f33-5303e0547469.jpg" />. After a time <img src="12-7501194\b0ec0372-4249-47ed-97f0-1e76975a47ac.jpg" /> after quenching the domain size in the system grows as</p><p><img src="12-7501194\aa1bce64-6a77-4a6f-b965-61826c0855d1.jpg" />.</p><p>In the ac susceptibility measurements, the ac field excites droplets of length scales <img src="12-7501194\48a38009-d36c-44fc-a8e3-cfa71d246064.jpg" /> up to</p><p><img src="12-7501194\92bda23c-20fd-459c-979e-76930a4ec9e6.jpg" />.</p><p>Because in aging experiments the time <img src="12-7501194\77777eb2-9c4a-4927-94bd-069d07835988.jpg" /> spent after quench is <img src="12-7501194\b9752b25-e0eb-436c-90ad-53bdd787d014.jpg" /> [23-26] one has<img src="12-7501194\fb008222-5d43-49b1-8023-72e43093d03a.jpg" />. These droplets have walls which partly coincide with walls of the domain of size<img src="12-7501194\d44d8a01-8870-4ee4-8e80-5ccc2a9a0683.jpg" />.</p><p>In this paper we investigate the real time non-equilibrium dynamics in d-dimensional Ising spin glass in a transverse field in terms of droplet model at very low temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref26">26</xref>]. We calculate the dissipative component of the ac susceptibility as a function of the time elapsedsince a thermal quench and frequency of driven field.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Model Hamiltonian</title><p>The droplet model describing the low-dimensional shortrange Ising spin glass is based on renormalization group arguments [26,28]. In dimensions above the lower critical dimension <img src="12-7501194\873c38fa-b798-45b7-8e7a-925dc159e52d.jpg" /> (usually in spin glass<img src="12-7501194\701d025b-d3ba-4d1d-a794-1b651708d70a.jpg" />) the droplet model finds a low temperature spin-glass phase in zero magnetic field. This phase differs essentially from the spin-glass phase in the mean-field approximation of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick infinite-range spin-glass model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref13">13</xref>]. In the droplet model there are only two pure thermodynamical states related to each other by a global spin flip. In magnetic field there is no phase transition. A droplet is an excited cluster in an ordered state where all the spins are inverted. The natural scaling ansatz for droplet free energy<img src="12-7501194\801ba6ad-2062-45d7-b6be-f2d21793e4f4.jpg" />, which are considered to be independent random variables, is<img src="12-7501194\faf8df56-4470-419d-8cf3-f4cc2ab39e2b.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\c36c3dfb-41b3-47f6-bb09-45226840d492.jpg" />; <img src="12-7501194\560a6642-ee58-4f80-adbd-7270a558de46.jpg" />is the correlation length, <img src="12-7501194\bad749af-87d7-4313-8154-94c794060932.jpg" />is the length scale of droplet and <img src="12-7501194\355c6eba-828e-40e4-b1e0-9470f9b2e579.jpg" /> is the zero temperature thermal exponent. The droplet excitations have a broad distribution of their free energies at scale <img src="12-7501194\d98a4219-4315-453d-a2bc-f78cd602826f.jpg" /> for large <img src="12-7501194\4e469154-df82-4834-9dc6-5f87fb0f89c9.jpg" /> in a scaling form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref4">4</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29726"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\6ca6bbea-173f-4ae0-b74d-9b9676ec2ded.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is assumed that<img src="12-7501194\63e4dc86-3226-42fb-a4b9-173cb6de5afd.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\e786aebb-89e6-4cef-86d6-dbca29c63b60.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\4aad0644-ba8e-4830-87d7-6fce499e55a4.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\7f20f388-aecc-4cd6-80e1-1f6fb033cb29.jpg" />.<img src="12-7501194\df66d324-da69-430d-8c26-ba36c5baec60.jpg" /> is a generalized temperature dependent stiffness modulus which is of order of characteristic exchange <img src="12-7501194\7e89fc86-5b0f-4565-93ce-18d57270bd92.jpg" /> at <img src="12-7501194\e426efe6-7b58-42fc-bb74-403ddad34c1d.jpg" /> and vanishes for</p><p><img src="12-7501194\d76564bb-0925-4377-aeab-cdcfac47cb69.jpg" />. One droplet consists of order <img src="12-7501194\73727e9f-1309-4a80-9e23-d92621de2e41.jpg" /> spins. Below<img src="12-7501194\22f1d804-e6bf-4b57-aeb9-a2a9f922b6de.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\5d87e805-2967-4718-b0fb-bada24de041d.jpg" />; above <img src="12-7501194\1649cc8e-0368-4e05-bf68-4c4d41ef8432.jpg" /> one has<img src="12-7501194\2ee59c8e-6f5d-49f0-9de1-d85a1346b6e0.jpg" />. The droplet model of classical Ising spin glass was considered by D.S. Fisher and D.A. Huse [26,27].</p><p>In this paper we use a phenomenological quantum droplet model of spin glass theory [26-29] (which does not use the mean-field approximation) in order to describe the non equilibrium behavior of the magnetic dynamical susceptibility at very low (but finite) temperatures<img src="12-7501194\dfa44662-d21f-4cd4-b98c-ba79996d7e23.jpg" />.</p><p>We consider the following model hamiltonian of ddimensional Ising spin glass in a transverse field,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29727"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\8cb1dff7-d428-4877-9ba7-198a5d47b4b1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7501194\57bc7eff-1238-4d15-82a5-1e7140cb2316.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7501194\615535ad-3774-47ec-8f2e-cf0966a18f0d.jpg" /> are the Pauli matrices, <img src="12-7501194\6a6195af-44e1-4305-9c9b-c49cb9219a56.jpg" />is the strength of the transverse field and the nearest neighbor interactions <img src="12-7501194\0d642fb4-8174-4dfd-925f-88322e34274a.jpg" /> are independent random variables of mean zero and the sum in Equation (4) is performed over nearest neighbors.</p><p>The quantum spin glass transition in a dilute dipole coupled magnet <img src="12-7501194\b65834c5-bb04-47f6-9fbb-079dc01fde7c.jpg" /> is described by this model hamiltonian [4,13,20]. It is supposed that this model may also represent, for example, the physics of deuteron glass such as <img src="12-7501194\d612c62f-c1e9-4679-9787-bee18579c593.jpg" /> and mixed betaine phosphate-phosphite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref28">28</xref>]. The transverse field in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref28">28</xref>] is interpreted as the frequency of the proton tunneling.</p><p>In ref. [26,27], M. J. Thill and D. A. Huse have shown that for enough low T the quantum hamiltonian Equation (4) can be represented as independent quantum two-level systems (low energy droplets) with the hamiltonian,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29728"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\8b3892b6-6839-4455-ae9b-7bd602218d1d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7501194\157deeed-3db4-4f81-8d95-6a6662b7240f.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7501194\c1bb25b2-d152-4cd5-99a9-ab71b20bd0b2.jpg" /> are the Pauli matrices representing the two states of the droplet<img src="12-7501194\adcf5f80-44d1-4c64-9224-597cb4a1cbe8.jpg" />; the sum is over all droplets <img src="12-7501194\b382412a-5674-46bb-88de-7f4f9a5cd9e8.jpg" /> at length scale <img src="12-7501194\22044efe-6d43-4187-b03d-d5c6b8ec23fe.jpg" /> and over all length scales<img src="12-7501194\5c19c0a9-a6ed-4390-90ac-cd144470f760.jpg" />, and</p><p><img src="12-7501194\5dda1fed-3c53-4e0a-ae46-2fd54c26a29a.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="12-7501194\0643718d-0552-482c-9de5-6cd26ed832be.jpg" /> is a short-distance cutoff; <img src="12-7501194\d87d11a6-02fb-43d4-9f03-d37a0318ba74.jpg" />is the droplet energy which is independent random variable with scaling ansatz <img src="12-7501194\097adc12-67b2-4cb4-95bd-d4fb2f1ca0ee.jpg" /> The droplet length scale <img src="12-7501194\cee10cf5-4eee-46e8-aec0-6e8f022d0fa7.jpg" /> is more or of order of the correlation length.The value <img src="12-7501194\dfa10c05-44b3-48ee-b82a-e161e60c0cbe.jpg" /> which regulates the strength of quantum fluctuations (<img src="12-7501194\358a70f7-cf12-4e1c-819b-6eb18b5fe8c7.jpg" />corresponds to the classical limit) is the tunneling rate for a droplet of linear size <img src="12-7501194\b7c05864-673e-46e8-9167-7d467ff324e9.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7501194\fb82a25f-f76c-4360-bf4f-57fd3fe5cdbb.jpg" /> is a coefficient which is approximately the same for all droplets. <img src="12-7501194\6e96428b-1810-40a1-b5e0-62a3243a707a.jpg" />is a microscopic tunneling rate and, finally, we assume <img src="12-7501194\ec5ffedd-721a-46d4-99d0-48c98ec93b6d.jpg" /> is the same for all droplets of scale <img src="12-7501194\e68ee06f-0e09-4e44-bce6-74d43099eb78.jpg" /> [26,27].</p><p>In the quantum droplet model of Thill and Huse [26,27] the relative reduction of the Edwards-Anderson order parameter <img src="12-7501194\02bc8155-c0a9-4c7c-8daa-179503e59326.jpg" /> from its zero temperature value <img src="12-7501194\fa97cb1f-9b64-4a8f-b71d-adbc43f2d05f.jpg" /> for <img src="12-7501194\c8669f0e-d35c-4a79-8705-87e6bd4b3012.jpg" /> is given by,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\0e59e1d4-70ed-42a3-aa62-3759d24fb1db.jpg" /></p><p>Here <img src="12-7501194\9fdb5992-1c2d-4f99-8f1d-28e8adeb07e8.jpg" /> is the stiffness modulus, and</p><p><img src="12-7501194\b56a13f2-4d2d-465d-851f-7ad8aee65f08.jpg" /></p><p>is the classical-to-quantum crossover length scale defined by<img src="12-7501194\b798cae4-1831-4631-a6c7-d9aa828ec0f4.jpg" />. For droplets with <img src="12-7501194\12e6a1a7-1d0a-49dc-babf-a2c31bfe30c2.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="12-7501194\9e2fe915-0ff0-49cd-8f1b-7c2701b6a738.jpg" />(quantum regime [26-28]), the excitation energy <img src="12-7501194\5e75bc53-adee-4564-ac49-26b11428c7e8.jpg" /> is always greater than <img src="12-7501194\b9571080-e4cb-4c9e-8ef3-e8b409f2e43d.jpg" /> and thermal fluctuations are irrelevant. These droplets behave quantum mechanically. The larger droplets <img src="12-7501194\21b3cd41-ae95-443a-8be0-94bf318f92fa.jpg" /> have <img src="12-7501194\43814082-087b-4e2c-9a6b-ebc222d0f3c2.jpg" /> and behave classically. In quantum regime the length growth is due to quantum fluctuations connected with droplet are quantum-mechanically active for <img src="12-7501194\f31c80d8-6cec-48f2-bc65-75fdd3731194.jpg" /> is proportional to<img src="12-7501194\1252c45d-4072-4cd5-b376-565a3eeb7072.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Dynamic Nonequilibrium Magnetic Susceptibility</title><p>We consider the time dependent Hamiltonian <img src="12-7501194\fc42fa3a-26b1-458f-9669-b6a9ae9ef0d4.jpg" /> of the quantum system in the form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref34">34</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29729"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\b51ec243-494c-4500-ba2e-0f6dfa7b78a0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7501194\29e20a3f-7044-417a-a78c-85d89b26011a.jpg" /> is the Hamiltonian of the unperturbed system and describes the equilibrium system.We suppose that the external perturbation <img src="12-7501194\9005e257-777a-4dd1-bfd8-98dc960bac2d.jpg" /> is in some sense small. <img src="12-7501194\13e5cc73-9814-44b2-a0c4-4ddb35f0137c.jpg" />is a linear operator which connects external timedependent force <img src="12-7501194\73f23ae1-3f55-4fca-a696-7e7ba450e5d4.jpg" /> with the system. We shall use the quantum-mechanical equations for the system dynamical response <img src="12-7501194\83e97cc6-e963-43c4-91aa-7b9ef6900410.jpg" /> to the force <img src="12-7501194\7872dd3c-52b8-4b80-8aff-cff79feb6355.jpg" /> in terms of the time-evolution operator<img src="12-7501194\04ead487-9718-4892-aa91-78c2ea8f73e4.jpg" />;<img src="12-7501194\071a9795-daa3-4f2c-ab17-8069f6f78eb8.jpg" /> is an Heisenberg operator, <img src="12-7501194\96d415c0-5cca-4ede-a6a3-41bfa051613e.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\35760e47-0c26-4893-82fc-296cc64fcff9.jpg" />is the average value of <img src="12-7501194\ab114b47-d03b-41dd-add1-6314b0026b8f.jpg" /> in equilibrium; the sign + means conjugate value. It is necessary to approximate <img src="12-7501194\5dcbce3c-bd0a-47ff-8b8f-1a9ee5b0df24.jpg" /> using the well-known perturbation expansion through first order in<img src="12-7501194\7604401d-bb28-491d-80b2-d865bcb2bca2.jpg" />. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29730"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\0846e871-e0b0-41fa-b781-93dead63f516.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="12-7501194\cab7b311-9387-4df0-ac17-7d6053d1b8df.jpg" />.</p><p>We consider the functional of the dynamic response of the form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref34">34</xref>]<img src="12-7501194\f869d3a3-26ae-4637-bbf1-8a7353daeb7a.jpg" />, where</p><p><img src="12-7501194\dca94c67-fc57-422c-af4c-b327f6a3ca37.jpg" />means thermal average with a density matrix</p><p><img src="12-7501194\31149345-19a3-4c69-94c1-6efcbdb88cce.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\5b94104d-9094-4918-892f-ce1115b5588f.jpg" /> is the time moment when the perturbating field is turned on,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\2c3920b6-372f-4391-a398-bab1988d7aba.jpg" />.</p><p>Now we apply the aforementioned expressions for dynamic response to a magnetic droplet system. The response <img src="12-7501194\1d56de0d-97b6-432a-af4f-24f0daac764c.jpg" /> is then the induced magnetization <img src="12-7501194\a25d824b-1228-40a4-ad55-36bfeb6ba82d.jpg" /></p><p>of the system. <img src="12-7501194\f2f35ef7-c13f-4579-b70d-3b678d58600b.jpg" />is the equilibrium magnetization</p><p><img src="12-7501194\5b1db2db-01ad-4bb4-90e0-df4f977f60fd.jpg" />. Let a small magnetic oscillating field <img src="12-7501194\a2df54a1-bb88-4509-9fc5-daa20605c110.jpg" /> <img src="12-7501194\35fad998-9f55-48e8-9f56-dec25a72f923.jpg" /> be applied in z-direction. Here <img src="12-7501194\b90a1333-e8c6-4945-917d-0dcadee4037b.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7501194\8916b179-c71c-46e1-b90d-c984b33273b4.jpg" /> are the amplitude and frequency of the ac field.</p><p>When one measures the ac susceptibility in spin glasses in the external magnetic oscillating field it is observed an aging effect: magnetic response of the system to the weak external field depends on the thermal history of the sample, on the time during which the system was kept in a spin glass phase. The sample is quenched in zero magnetic field from temperature <img src="12-7501194\fe99e8c3-2447-4a48-88a6-3a1f4744a45e.jpg" /> to the temperature <img src="12-7501194\72b4e513-a90d-45ef-9136-1e2c95353cce.jpg" /> which is reached at time<img src="12-7501194\c32defb1-5e16-4101-b001-900f6023d294.jpg" />. At this moment a very small external magnetic oscillating field <img src="12-7501194\f4844f5c-de0a-4738-8c7f-46d409b4ff37.jpg" /> is applied to measure the ac susceptibility of the sample. The evolution continues in isothermal conditions, <img src="12-7501194\5e837a99-1cef-4991-9689-061497bc4a97.jpg" />is measured as a function of the time <img src="12-7501194\f806b067-9276-4d8b-b777-8970e99387ff.jpg" /> elapsed since the sample reached the temperature <img src="12-7501194\4a8ef077-6e41-4459-aa10-02d0d9b84fcd.jpg" /> at fixed frequency<img src="12-7501194\19445217-602d-4718-93f5-12711cebfa41.jpg" />.</p><p>The system is probed at the time <img src="12-7501194\6e72a769-cabe-4c37-8c4d-c448efe5ae9b.jpg" /> after quench end (“the age”). Using the linear response theory the magnetization of magnetic system is [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref35">35</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29731"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\13e0af69-b7b5-479a-b534-421f30d4a730.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7501194\5605a168-d171-4774-8704-99e8b98dbe02.jpg" /> is the magnetic dynamic susceptibility and defines the magnetic response at moment <img src="12-7501194\dabf3489-4bce-47c6-ab03-12a4522a5950.jpg" /> to a unit pulse of magnetic field at moment<img src="12-7501194\cb927969-452f-4474-9e12-40120f29ae88.jpg" />. The nonequilibrium processes are investigated by means of low-frequency susceptibility measurements. The frequency dependent ac susceptibility is measured by means of applied ac magnetic field <img src="12-7501194\1cc37d83-c8ba-4d1c-878d-331636218c66.jpg" /> at time<img src="12-7501194\9f85d47e-1243-450a-b1b7-e8f663dc8ba2.jpg" />. Then one can find <img src="12-7501194\d7d2d7b3-d363-450a-a2ac-2c8b3b9e108f.jpg" /> by the Fourier-transform of the magnetization over the time interval <img src="12-7501194\d254f69d-0dc6-4cb1-9ad9-8b145d60b49a.jpg" /> centered on <img src="12-7501194\871f4cfa-0f9b-48ff-832e-9695773ec55e.jpg" /> [15,35],</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29732"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\348050c0-01c2-4360-8049-05c0b70ca584.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If magnetic response function slightly changes over the time segment <img src="12-7501194\53adbebb-ed25-4715-8f64-1cf8c9381704.jpg" /> then the susceptibility <img src="12-7501194\76aa6032-f40c-4b14-b699-13d133dca6b3.jpg" /> will be equal to [15,35]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29733"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\148a5ce5-34d9-4867-b82d-6693a0783829.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We consider the behavior of the magnetic droplet system described by the Hamiltonian <img src="12-7501194\60dc68c8-bf8a-4d5c-bc0b-3e65ece37ebf.jpg" /> and under ac field <img src="12-7501194\6c41176f-686c-46de-828a-64867f4887d9.jpg" /> in quantum regime<img src="12-7501194\0d2974cb-db17-41df-b410-0305edbff8e7.jpg" />. In our calculations, we suppose that<img src="12-7501194\c12f47b9-3c8d-407a-aee3-ebe96a992dae.jpg" />. There is a complicated crossover between classic and quantum behaviors of the droplets which depends on temperature, ac field frequency and length scale<img src="12-7501194\d03e101d-d548-475e-a2e7-5aaf898af4f7.jpg" />. According to [26,27] the dynamical crossover length is determined from the condition<img src="12-7501194\afec50a0-b0ed-4b4c-bf99-ac7cb15ed8a5.jpg" />, i.e.<img src="12-7501194\9ce74cf7-eadb-4514-a57d-58d361742c4d.jpg" />. The system behaves presumably classically or quantum mechanically when the dominant length scale <img src="12-7501194\b2bf08bd-f1fe-4427-8462-dbf30aa4706f.jpg" /> is above or below <img src="12-7501194\c52ae32a-25a6-41fd-8e2e-9dd420946001.jpg" /> for fixed frequency<img src="12-7501194\ae111fd4-80ca-449d-9deb-02b4c7711919.jpg" />.</p><p>Following to aforementioned quantum droplet theory with model Hamiltonian (4) and domain growth ideas, we calculate the magnetic dynamic susceptibility using the dynamical response functional which includes first and second order linear response functions. The contribution of a single droplet to the ac susceptibility up to some factor <img src="12-7501194\8cd8adb9-8f6d-4407-8ac9-3f69709a7089.jpg" /> is,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29734"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\2f9194d4-ed04-49de-9442-10d96e6b6c1c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7501194\dbf43ea2-6e61-4590-9ffb-b30bee2028cb.jpg" /> is the Edwards-Anderson order parameter,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\4c18eba2-dd4d-4655-b918-796c2eed5beb.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\bab83516-c15d-47f6-bc41-58c34df22fb0.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\e33b79da-2229-4b12-9d77-061124021e61.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\bbd19e39-4a26-4abe-9d1e-c13124ed6e2a.jpg" />is the static susceptibility of the droplet<img src="12-7501194\6b1b1624-8f48-4c64-a89d-9b1b635f781c.jpg" />. The expression (11) is obtained for low frequencies under&#160; the condition<img src="12-7501194\e5b73753-ce16-47c5-8bcd-a33608703eaa.jpg" /> (and<img src="12-7501194\bd43a97c-d1ca-44b1-88b9-84c94216826a.jpg" />), because this condition is used to observe non-stationary dynamics in susceptibility measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref5">5</xref>]. Now we have to average the susceptibility (11) over droplet energies <img src="12-7501194\564274f6-4018-4a4a-a5d1-b1d51caafa14.jpg" /> and over droplet length scales<img src="12-7501194\ef9443bd-031a-4ba7-b9f2-37dd2397784a.jpg" />. We use the droplet energy distribution <img src="12-7501194\dcbe5cb3-16fe-4704-a443-036817e2af50.jpg" /> given by Equation (3). Here we assume<img src="12-7501194\d8ca52ae-5d9d-4c1d-a790-9743cd4e3b81.jpg" />. While integrating over<img src="12-7501194\e294c7b7-c948-4918-9634-0ad6bbb2a4f3.jpg" />, we note that the susceptibility is dominated by droplets of length scale</p><p><img src="12-7501194\81efbd00-cc48-4c9f-8a36-9fc21a29224d.jpg" />; <img src="12-7501194\9a990919-3889-491c-a2e9-a64994cf0645.jpg" />is the natural length scale of the problem when <img src="12-7501194\1a151bc4-11cb-480d-94e8-06e7f33fe5ca.jpg" /> and it is the low limit ofthe integration over<img src="12-7501194\b2e7b136-9d04-4258-b567-26d28f2a4d3f.jpg" />. The upper limit is</p><p><img src="12-7501194\b49ed0ae-47b7-4078-ad11-dca33863879d.jpg" />. After integration over droplet energies and length scales we obtain the following expression for imaginary part of susceptibility of the droplet system:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29735"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\823d8419-2ca8-48b2-8967-13354c8b878c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7501194\2dba3c69-5da3-4963-a223-7e0202cc9271.jpg" /> is the incomplete gamma-function, <img src="12-7501194\b1ba6eae-dbc7-418e-81d1-e4be60db1ff7.jpg" />is the exponential integral function,</p><p><img src="12-7501194\bc5c32f8-090a-4d7a-b700-d8df7f50ba5e.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\ade1f1a3-a993-47d2-b1c9-95e8af8c3fd9.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\2741b8cf-5f63-412b-8cc5-7b9856004b5b.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\18863a07-f6d9-41cb-ab9b-c6c336fb6f66.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\f8fbcc96-0524-46af-86e2-67c550af2544.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\6aae4704-28ff-4167-9f57-b994dfd1eafc.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\ebda4967-3ca1-46ef-a66d-d0e89aa59824.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\a5b75c7b-6575-46a0-a851-0ecd1d86c074.jpg" />.</p><p>During the calculations we have used the following approximations:<img src="12-7501194\1ef29442-ce41-4de9-9dca-65287dd7429e.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\67421a74-46c4-44c6-9bc2-242ff72b6bef.jpg" />.</p><p>The Equation (12) is the main result of this paper.</p><p>As we see, the susceptibility <img src="12-7501194\67e0c6ad-2a7f-4ee6-a1ed-df6cf29ba319.jpg" /> depends on many parameters of the droplet system and the external ac magnetic field: on the form of droplet energies distribution<img src="12-7501194\1cb68f12-287e-4d73-a4d6-14df811717b9.jpg" />, on the droplet microscopic tunneling rate<img src="12-7501194\369dfabc-c530-457b-a516-f1c4f2e09906.jpg" />, on the temperature, on the system “age”<img src="12-7501194\d1824d40-06a8-4ab2-b675-662a449ac0c6.jpg" />, on the ac field frequency and amplitude. Furthermore, we note that the expression (12) consists of terms which are time independent which describe oscillations with frequency, and terms which depend on <img src="12-7501194\065c2274-c9a9-4b24-bc2b-174ad210f752.jpg" /> and define nonstationary non-equilibrium dynamics of the droplet system. Thus the imaginary part of susceptibility can be represented as a sum of stationary part <img src="12-7501194\d522474b-bfe7-4eeb-870a-aa6b2fd50003.jpg" /> and non-stationary part<img src="12-7501194\60cdd8e7-928a-4401-964f-978290b885ab.jpg" />:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.33083-formula29736"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7501194\f2bdf7d2-3e26-4e47-8539-7c4ff46dfce8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For a numerical calculations of the expression (12), we take the following values of the parameters:<img src="12-7501194\fffcca74-8807-4c68-bc00-7927c12b8e79.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\17c93a5a-92b5-4e79-abdf-d81336263fc0.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\ba60dee6-c381-461c-a1f8-d8cb6c960781.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\f0c1049d-9a71-4138-b4df-a502ea8022f0.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\0d7baf48-9c01-44a1-a97d-c63b47f87917.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\42f31675-f29a-47a9-b50a-fba7ca4e89c4.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\0f0e4d15-9943-4e32-949b-821dd7910487.jpg" />, <img src="12-7501194\2f34696b-3d99-4be5-abb8-8c44ad86ca7d.jpg" />,<img src="12-7501194\0131b2e4-9ef4-4e53-b9ae-c3c1e5b9cf61.jpg" />.</p><p>In Figures 1-3 it is shown the <img src="12-7501194\bd5512ea-ce12-4383-b27a-9206ff09a3ab.jpg" />-dependence of the imaginary part<img src="12-7501194\d11e14b1-fee6-4ac6-ace1-1cf832cde91c.jpg" /> at different fixed Т (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), <img src="12-7501194\74fd8734-2935-4439-8e5d-0ada07920cfd.jpg" />(<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and <img src="12-7501194\a3eb084d-bdb5-41df-8d97-a86119839264.jpg" /> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The susceptibility quickly goes down and then slowly decays to some value with oscillations. Then we observe the stationary behavior of susceptibility. In particular, in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> we observe as, on longer times, the quantum fluctuations (<img src="12-7501194\8fddda06-64f5-4853-9d3a-0b3cddfb4ccb.jpg" />dependence) becomes irrelevant.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion and Conclusions</title><p>In this paper we have investigated the low temperature non-equilibrium dynamic behavior of magnetic susceptibility in d-dimensional short-range Ising spin glass in a transverse field in terms of phenomenological droplet model taking into account quantum fluctuations. In particular we calculated the imaginary part of low-frequency susceptibility <img src="12-7501194\a4495081-1341-4ba3-b57e-acb5b0927112.jpg" /> as function of time <img src="12-7501194\4b8930bd-b926-4041-80fa-7a79fec75127.jpg" /> (elapsed from the quench to measurement moment) and frequency <img src="12-7501194\19cea065-9689-4033-9c8c-12e7851bd686.jpg" /> of the ac magnetic field. It has been shown that the imaginary part of <img src="12-7501194\1969046e-4b28-4762-b542-83a44f218383.jpg" /> of the droplet system at low temperatures (quantum regime) has two time regions where its time behavior has different nature. On short times <img src="12-7501194\4a3fd3a0-d089-4202-a023-6623f919c582.jpg" /> we observe quickly non-equilibrium dynamic decay of<img src="12-7501194\fb9bc68e-ef19-4151-b62b-d18f82244651.jpg" />. On long times the susceptibility curve is a periodical function oscillating near some constant value (stationary process). We find temperature dependence of imaginary part of susceptibility and show how the quantum fluctuations influence the dynamic susceptibility of the droplet system at very low temperatures. If the ac field frequency increases then the nonequilibrium dynamics is suppressed. Thus the droplet system response to an external perturbing field depends on its thermal history.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref17">17</xref>] it is shown that the behavior of response function <img src="12-7501194\76c3f0d4-8ea3-4631-a6ec-c47232c851e4.jpg" /> confirms the existence of two time regimes in spin glass: stationary and aging regimes in quantum systems. The theoretical curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref17">17</xref>]) of <img src="12-7501194\15a1bfde-b800-40a7-9655-0886700a03ef.jpg" />was given as function of <img src="12-7501194\e459edcf-601f-4ccf-a3d2-53f088c6646d.jpg" /> for<img src="12-7501194\86420b71-e48a-4698-bc67-9024783db4de.jpg" />, and <img src="12-7501194\d7567452-aefe-42ac-b775-96790be1119a.jpg" /> (<img src="12-7501194\fe482111-0708-4c1c-a683-2761420febf1.jpg" />—waiting time). For <img src="12-7501194\7bb51d87-a897-4766-b4fa-70260835795c.jpg" />(<img src="12-7501194\1cead3d4-dcfc-4e55-a258-941455f0e6de.jpg" />is some characteristic time) a stationary regime was found, whereas for <img src="12-7501194\3e11edbf-f2e2-446c-bd35-3aed599ad4a7.jpg" /> the dynamics is non-stationary. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref17">17</xref>] it is shown that quantum fluctuations in quantum glassy systems depress the phase transition temperature, in a glassy phase the aging effect survives the quantum fluctuations, and because of quantum fluctuations, the fluctuation-dissipation theorem is modified. In reference [19-21] it is shown that all terms in the dynamical equations governing the timeevolution of spin response and correlation function which are due to quantum effects, are irrelevant at long times. Quantum effects enter only through the renormalization of parameters in dynamical equations [19-21]. The behavior of spin response as function of τ in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref36">36</xref>] is similar to behavior of dynamical susceptibility in our paper. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref36">36</xref>] it is shown that quantum fluctuation slightly influences the aging regime and the quantum system behavior is approximately classic.</p><p>As far as we know there are no experiments on quantum spin glasses. In papers [17,23] there are experimental data for dynamic susceptibility in classic spin glasses. P. Svedlindh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref35">35</xref>] have investigated the behavior of <img src="12-7501194\50030a68-1456-440c-b1ff-a61336106aa2.jpg" /> and have found that decay is close to a logarithmic one. Shins et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.33083-ref22">22</xref>] also show that susceptibility decays with time in a nearly logarithmic way.</p><p>In our quantum system at very low temperature, we cannot find agreement with these data because classical and quantum spin glass has, in general, different behavior. We may compare our results with experimental data only approximately because these experimental data are on classical spin glasses and we consider here low-temperature dynamics of quantum spin glass. We observe a qualitatively similar behavior in the range of the small times elapsed since the quench.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.33083-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, “Heidelberg Colloquium on Glassy Dynamics,” J. L. van Hemmen and I. Morgenstern, Eds., Springer, Berlin, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. H. Fisher and J. A. Hertz, “Spin Glass,” Cambridge University Press, England, 1991. 
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628771</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Rieger, Annual Reviews of Computational Physics, Vol. 2, 1995, p. 295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. P. Young, “Spin Glass and Random Field,” World Scientific, Singapore, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J.-L. Barrat, M. Feidelman, J. Kurchan and J. Dalibard. “Slow Relaxations and Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Condensed Matter,” Springer, Berlin, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Physical Review B, Vol. B66, 2002, Article ID: 054404.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Herrison and M. Ocio, The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 40, 2004, pp. 283-294. 
doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00278-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Suzuki and I. S. Suzuki, The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 41, 2004, pp. 457-470.  
doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00339-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. C. E. Struik, “Physical Aging in Amorphous Polimers and Other Materials,” Elsevier, Houston, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Bellon, S. Ciliberto and C. Laroche, Europhysics Letters, Vol. 51, 2000, p. 551.  
doi:10.1209/epl/i2000-00368-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Norman, S. Muller, J.-C. Ravey and A. Parker, Macromolecules, Vol. 33, 2000, pp. 1063-1071. 
doi:10.1021/ma9909455</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Nishimori, “Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing,” Oxford University Press, 2001.  
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509417.001.0001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. A. Mydosh, “Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduction,” Taylor &amp; Francis, London, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. A. Huse, Physical Review, Vol. B43, 1991, pp. 8673-8675. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.43.8673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Komori, H. Yoshino and H. Takayama, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 68, 1999, p. 3387.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. S. Zotev, G. G. Kenning and R. Orbach, Physical Review B, Vol. 66, 2002, Article ID: 014412.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.014412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. F. Cugliandolo and G. Lozano, Physical Review B, Vol. 59, 1999, pp. 915-942. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.59.915</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 85, 2000, pp. 3013-3016.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. P. Kennett, C. Chamon and J. Ye, Physical Review B, Vol. 64, 2001, Article ID: 224408.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.64.224408</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Yoshino, K. Hukushima and H. Takayama, Physical Review B, Vol. 66, 2002, Article ID: 064431.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064431</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. E. Castillo, C. Chamon, L. F. Cugliandolo and M. P. Kennett, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 88, 2002, Article ID: 237201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.237201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Busiello, R. V. Saburova and V. G. Sushkova, The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 39, 2004, pp. 69-76.   
doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00172-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. G. Shins, A. F. Arts and H. W. de Wijn, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 70, 1993, p. 2340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Dupuis, V. Vincent, J.-Ph. Bouchaud, J. Hammann, A. Ito and H. A. Katori, Physical Review B, Vol. 64, 2001, Article ID: 174204. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.64.174204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. E. Jonsson, H. Yoshima, P. Nordblad, A. H. Katori and A. Ito, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 88, 2002, Article ID: 257204. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 56, 1986, pp. 1601-1604.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. J. Thill and D. A. Huse, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, Vol. 241, 1995, pp. 321-365. doi:10.1016/0378-4371(94)00247-Q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Busiello and R. V. Saburova, International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 14, 2000, p. 1843.  
doi:10.1142/S0217979200002168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Busiello, R. V. Saburova and V. G. Sushkova, Solid State Communications, Vol. 119, 2001, pp. 545-548. 
doi:10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00267-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. J. P. Gingras and P. Henelius, Proceedings of International Conference on Frustration in Condensed Matter (ICFCM), Sendai, 11-14 January 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Kutnjak, R. Pirc, A. Levstik, C. Filipic, R. Blinc and R. Kind, Physical Review B, Vol. 50, 1984, pp. 12421-12428.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.12421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. L. Hutton, I. Fehst, R. Bohmer, M. Braune, B. Mertz, P. Lunkenheimer and A. Loidl, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 66, 1991, pp. 1990-1993.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1990</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Wu, D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum and G. Aeppli, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 71, 1993, pp. 1919-1922.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. T. Grandy, “Foundation of Statistical Mechanics,” D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1988. 
doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2881-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Svedlindh, K. Gunnarsson and J.-O. Andersson, Physical Review B, Vol. 46, 1992, pp. 13867-13873. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.13867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.33083-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Biroli and O. Parcollet, Physical Review B, Vol. 65, 2002, Article ID: 094414. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.094414</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>