<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JQIS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Quantum Information Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5751</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jqis.2013.32010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JQIS-32825</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Survival Probability of the Quantum Walk with Phase Parameters on the Two-Dimensional Trapped Lattice
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>lement</surname><given-names>Ampadu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meltem</surname><given-names>Gönülol</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ekrem</surname><given-names>Aydıner</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>?stanbul University Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, ?stanbul University, ?stanbul, Turkey </addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>31 Carrolton Road, Boston, MA, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>drampadu@hotmail.com(LA)</email>;<email>ekrem.aydiner@istanbul.edu.tr(EA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>06</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>May</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   We investigate the time dependence of the survival probability of quantum walks governed by Fibonacci walks with phase parameters on the trapped two-dimensional lattice. We have shown that the survival probability of the quantum walk decays with time obey to the stretched exponential law for all initial states of walkers. We have also shown that stretched exponential decay parameter β can be arranged by phase parameter combination. Obtained numerical results show that phase parameters can be used as a control parameter to determine the decay rate of the survival probability of the quantum walk. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Quantum Walk; Survival Probability</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, the quantum walk on the trapped lattice has been intensively investigated due to importance applications in quantum information and computing. Therefore, many theoretical and experimental studies have been carried out to understand the effect of the trapping states on the quantum walk. For example, Agliari [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref1">1</xref>] considered a continuous-time quantum walk propagating on Erdos-Renyi random graphs in the presence of a random distribution of traps, and showed that the survival probability exhibits an exponential character which fluctuates depending on the trap concentration. Zahringer et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref2">2</xref>] implemented a quantum walk using trapped ions. They used an experimental technique to determine the probability distribution along a line in phase space. It is shown that instabilities in the trapping frequency leads to decoherence and by change in the coupling strength due to high phonon numbers. Schimitz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref3">3</xref>] implemented the proof of principle for the quantum walk of one ion in a linear ion trap. It is shown that quantum interference enforces asymmetric, nonclassical distributions in the highly entangled degrees of freedom (of coin and position states). Xue et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref4">4</xref>] implemented a multi-step quantum walk for a single trapped ion with interpolation between quantum and random walk by randomizing the generalized Hadamard coin flip phase. It is shown that the distribution of the walker spreads over unbounded position space rather than being folded back on itself. Agliari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref5">5</xref>] studied the continuous time quantum walk focusing on trapping processes on a ring and show that when the traps are arranged periodically the survival probability decays asymptotically, when the traps are arranged to form a cluster the survival probability decays exponentially, on the other hand for randomly distributed traps the survival probability decays algebraically. Eckert et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref6">6</xref>] implemented the quantum walk with a neutral atom trapped in a ground state of optical potentials by using the concept of spatially delocalized quibits, that is, a coin defined through the presence of the atom in one out of two trapping potentials. It is shown that the shaking of the trap position on the quantum walk leads to a flat distribution in the transition from quantum to classical in the intermediate. Wojcik et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref7">7</xref>] studied changing a phase at a single point in a discrete quantum walk. For certain values of this phase change and the internal coin-state of the walker it is shown the distribution exhibits the localization phenomenon. Altmann et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref8">8</xref>] studied chaotic scattering, it is shown that noise enhances the trapping of trajectories in scattering systems. In particular, they show that weak noise leads to a slower decay of the survival probability. Karksi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref9">9</xref>] implemented a quantum walk on the line with single neutral atoms by deterministically delocalizing them over the sites of a one-dimensional spin-dependent optical lattice. For symmetric and asymmetric quantum walks, it is shown that the distribution is double peaked with large amplitude close to the edges of the distribution. Xu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref10">10</xref>] studied coherent exciton dynamics modeled by continuous-time quantum walks on long-time range interacting cycles in which the distribution is shown to display a power law. Muelken et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref11">11</xref>] in their quest for signatures of coherent transport studied exciton trapping in the continuous-time quantum walk, and show that the survival probability displays different decay domains. Finally, Gonulol et al. [12,13] shown that the time dependence of the survival probability of quantum walkers has a piecewise stretched exponential character depending on the density of traps.</p><p>It can be seen from the brief review that, in these studies, the focus is on how the traps affect the distribution of the survival probability of the usual quantum walk governed by Hadamard, Grover or Fourier coin operators. Recently, the quantum walk with phase parameters has been considered by a number of authors, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref14">14</xref>] for example. In this study, they proposed a different coin operator with parameters that alters the phase of the states of the walk on the line, and they show that the parameters in the coin operators affects the resulting probability distribution of quantum walk. The variance and shape of the probability distribution of states of the quantum walk depending on the phase parameters may be valuable results in point of view of the theory of quantum computation. Therefore in this paper we will study the survival probability of quantum walk with phase parameters on the two dimensional trapped lattice. To this end, we consider usual quantum walk with a special parametrization of the Fibonacci coin operator <img src="1-1300065\bda2b779-fc39-4885-a43d-8a5d065c904e.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref15">15</xref>] and define the coin operator as <img src="1-1300065\39b365dc-24c0-4cf6-b541-24975d8844aa.jpg" /> where <img src="1-1300065\7f0b2037-9f40-4c10-b5f2-daf439217f21.jpg" /> is a two-dimensional generalizetion of the Fibonacci operator of <img src="1-1300065\2982671f-f4cd-4dc3-8c62-dbcc336cdb8f.jpg" /> and <img src="1-1300065\fe13510f-811e-462d-b7c0-f023ea54321c.jpg" /> is the diagonal phase adjustment. We show that the survival probability of the quantum walk with phase parameters on the trapped two dimensional lattice decays with time as the stretched exponentially for different initial states of walkers. We have also shown that stretched exponential decay parameter β of the walk can be arranged by phase parameter combination.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we define the quantum walk on the square lattice with phase parameters. We also present in this section the time evolution for a single-particle walk as well as multi-particle walk in which the particles are distinguishable. In Section 3, we derive the survival probability using the exact numeration method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref18">18</xref>]. To account for randomization, we also calculate the mean survival probability in this section. In Section 4 the numerical analysis of the survival probability to determine how the traps affect its distribution is given. Section 5 is devoted to the conclusions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Quantum Walk with Phase Parameters on the Square Lattice</title><p>We consider the discrete-time quantum walk on the square lattice with boundary conditions. The coin space of a single walker is given by <img src="1-1300065\a419f7ab-11ca-4807-9470-1e0bcf7edd34.jpg" /> where <img src="1-1300065\5788c064-34e4-4bb2-b996-2d4c82996ea0.jpg" /> corresponds to the chirality states left, right, up, and down respectively. In this paper we will put,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2236"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\11c44afe-f326-4630-9962-00eeddc1a494.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The position space is given by<img src="1-1300065\3a8415ba-44cb-40e7-8459-119d5ae88fcb.jpg" />. The Hilbert space of the total system is given by<img src="1-1300065\593220ae-9e49-459a-8d61-9f394195c048.jpg" />. Recall that the evolution of the walk is given by<img src="1-1300065\f9b54729-7e8e-47c2-83c7-5af542f2d0f9.jpg" />, where <img src="1-1300065\f79d44cb-10bc-4412-8d5b-5e8a07b5f8ae.jpg" /> is the shift operator, <img src="1-1300065\8c13225d-b018-46fc-94ae-eeae7c242970.jpg" />is the identity operator and <img src="1-1300065\3c256a11-ee95-4ad0-94a4-652e03a12e28.jpg" /> is the coin operator governing the walk. In this paper we will take<img src="1-1300065\5c89c593-a6b8-40c7-af6c-fe93f4d7d21b.jpg" />, where <img src="1-1300065\cad11e7c-8a1b-4d6c-b4f7-270c738a30b0.jpg" /> is a two-dimensional generalization of the Fibonacci operator and <img src="1-1300065\f93341e7-977e-4a5e-a0d8-6120abae698c.jpg" /> is the diagonal phase adjustment. In particular, diagonal phase adjustment can be defined as<img src="1-1300065\049e54e8-9a96-4555-9473-9c7a2d754ea2.jpg" />, where<img src="1-1300065\1c7857c9-0820-406c-801b-f4a625420095.jpg" />;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2237"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\46a9107b-faf9-4dc6-bfa4-23395a0567b5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Denote the total number of sites on the lattice by<img src="1-1300065\73bfee3c-b7fe-4fa2-aed7-bf2acf536097.jpg" />, then the shift operator is given by,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2238"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\79d4256e-1b18-4199-b3a8-491698bb0fc5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We shall write the wave function of the walker at time <img src="1-1300065\90688536-5fc1-417c-bcf5-efa27a1ce3d6.jpg" /> as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2239"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\f729867d-63f7-4470-b3e9-87e6f531f32c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<img src="1-1300065\619204fc-9703-4325-bf6e-bf2f680ba96c.jpg" />. We define the state of the particle by,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2240"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\7d06ee6b-8fc5-4b08-90d2-64f468a42134.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-1300065\7ec86861-7ebc-47c8-aaff-ee0388bd1309.jpg" /> for <img src="1-1300065\fe3d3555-0453-49b2-90d0-3485b174370d.jpg" /> represent probability amplitudes of the particle at site <img src="1-1300065\2d41687a-f232-496c-bd03-bfe84d7136a1.jpg" /> at time<img src="1-1300065\0172f79d-4c8c-4c7b-9d40-a4fcc882d8e4.jpg" />, depending on the chirality state of the particle. In terms of the initial state<img src="1-1300065\9d26f734-d8e7-4685-8d0e-888161a3ad66.jpg" />, the evolution of the walk is given by<img src="1-1300065\4a9e3bf4-b8fe-4181-8caa-e59c2e933ba8.jpg" />. The density operator of the quantum walk is given by<img src="1-1300065\07488e28-0a81-45fe-b294-52c23bef0aa2.jpg" />. In terms of the density operator we can write the probability distribution of the walker at time <img src="1-1300065\7148b36a-cf20-47a7-8323-7699e5e1bbe6.jpg" /> as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2241"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\61d0f73e-7dc2-453b-bcde-28fd3fc01e10.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We should note that <img src="1-1300065\94443c40-1cba-4a6f-a7f9-50126ac34e8e.jpg" /> can be written as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2242"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\95019e3c-fd97-418c-81da-807c83775ce1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is standard in papers on the quantum walk instead of the representation above involving the density operator.</p><p>On the other hand, single particle quantum walks can be easily generalized multi-particle quantum walks if the particles are assumed as uncorrelated, non-interacting and distinguishable. The multi-particle walk has been investigated by the author of the present paper [16,17]. The case where indistinguishability plays a role has also been considered. For simplicity in this study we consider walkers which are non-interacting distinguishable particles and they are initially uncorrelated. If we assume the <img src="1-1300065\c26f89be-55c9-4fd2-b336-d86c5bf08082.jpg" /> particles are distinguishable and are initially uncorrelated the Hilbert space is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2243"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\03f104e8-3919-45dd-b060-260b7fe5a85f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2244"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\c2ee160b-f07c-48d6-86d4-48d0dcb827c8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-1300065\197fa009-65e9-4f92-bf51-8126b6408531.jpg" /> is the Hilbert space of the <img src="1-1300065\abbd7779-a644-468c-a1b2-1a3b1f0f4099.jpg" /> walker for<img src="1-1300065\095beb8d-45cf-4fdf-bc02-cc6d79ae0661.jpg" />. The evolution of the <img src="1-1300065\83f20732-0b76-441f-9e2a-44b31a73248a.jpg" />-particle walk in which indistinguishability does not play a role is given by<img src="1-1300065\a64a1247-1feb-4cc5-994f-21eebd4f56b3.jpg" />, where <img src="1-1300065\5f77264a-e8a0-48f0-a22c-cfb6404c85e1.jpg" /> is the same for each walker. The initial state of the <img src="1-1300065\9d27512f-bd38-42b6-bfa2-d0c0546a4be2.jpg" /> particles is written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2245"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\393a3c09-da4c-4cb8-8978-97bcf98e8f07.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Alternatively, Equation (10) is given by a tensor product of the single walker initial states as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2246"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\b2079dda-3c13-4dde-859b-271987676b27.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-1300065\e7267f38-3a0d-4e14-8482-be0ac94a2a8d.jpg" /> for <img src="1-1300065\5ad7f82c-71a3-40b9-b571-d8028afe3034.jpg" /> is the <img src="1-1300065\0e114a03-ca36-458a-8e1a-dab293f8d106.jpg" /> particle state with chirality<img src="1-1300065\d6bc2366-de14-4336-9028-6901ad33ef70.jpg" />, and position <img src="1-1300065\ead43980-7c22-4d3e-979d-c9d50b5cced1.jpg" /> (recall we are assuming that there are <img src="1-1300065\8f2e9c12-ae9d-455b-9620-816dda1c3176.jpg" /> sites on the square lattice). In terms of<img src="1-1300065\996a5fc1-b93e-42ce-bbed-75cb7923fea4.jpg" />, the evolution of the walk is given by<img src="1-1300065\35608d94-cbf7-487f-bcb1-a477d2d1f692.jpg" />. Using the reduced density operator <img src="1-1300065\db25ed89-c937-4a21-bc2b-a5f13e7988e8.jpg" /> we can write the probability distribution of a single walker at time <img src="1-1300065\e383c78e-5be7-4654-b8ba-cd0fb9e5dc55.jpg" /> by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2247"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\a0762f69-4549-4bbd-a827-85c6b3505a55.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="1-1300065\1fc9b6d4-72b5-4edb-8b50-bf025abf18bd.jpg" />. <img src="1-1300065\0b9b5be1-7c02-4311-8635-32ea3d9c9d80.jpg" />in Equation (12) represents the probability of a single walker at site <img src="1-1300065\ef85651e-a6cc-4ae1-9577-5c59200c7608.jpg" /> at time <img src="1-1300065\f9e38104-f658-40e5-a76c-c9692308c2bd.jpg" /> when the walker starts from site <img src="1-1300065\5b11f1cd-9d6a-429f-935f-c720fc99ea88.jpg" /> at<img src="1-1300065\0dcc15e1-fb59-415d-a454-93da5f88f852.jpg" />. The set <img src="1-1300065\583534ed-481f-427d-b18c-8aaa9e54092c.jpg" /> is the set of transition probabilities from <img src="1-1300065\684aeeac-f0fd-44ff-9de1-10c52c9f9024.jpg" /> to <img src="1-1300065\4571e42c-7651-4c91-aca5-ae97121faefa.jpg" /> of a single particle, which is the same interpretation given by Equation (6).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Survival Probability</title><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref18">18</xref>] the exact numeration method was used to calculate the survival probability in the classical random walk. This method was used by the authors in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref12">12</xref>] to calculate the survival probability of quantum walkers on a Cayley graph of the cyclic group of size <img src="1-1300065\3f69519f-728b-4e89-a8ea-5df3dd65b7fb.jpg" /> with absorbing trapped sites. In this section we adapt the exact numeration method to the square lattice to calculate the survival probability. We assume every untrapped site is occupied by a walker. At each step, the <img src="1-1300065\7bf3570f-80bc-40ef-9fe9-377cf857c317.jpg" /> walkers perform a classical random walk on the square lattice, for which the probability of finding the particle at site <img src="1-1300065\aaa8e25f-2d81-4354-91dc-b1a28edfb6d5.jpg" /> is calculated with the sum of the corresponding probabilities at its nearest neighbor sites divided by four. The survival probability at time t is given by,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2248"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\e95af1fd-20ff-48dd-9794-f32be51f4517.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <img src="1-1300065\0d36be4e-dc88-4ae1-a541-a15fbf1a96b5.jpg" /> enumerates a particular independent initial configuration of the system. Note that <img src="1-1300065\70f20c6d-82f6-4641-a069-f71339b273c9.jpg" /> or<img src="1-1300065\1bcf0e9a-37d4-4319-af49-4d274b0a1503.jpg" />, where <img src="1-1300065\10bbda86-2e8a-47df-90f2-5765efd337b9.jpg" /> is the number of traps on the square lattice and <img src="1-1300065\a6bfe8bd-1c96-4eb4-9383-8c3065745607.jpg" /> is the trapping density. We take the lattice sites at<img src="1-1300065\24157052-c492-4eaf-806f-8c4cc518a805.jpg" />. If site <img src="1-1300065\af621771-8fa2-4d25-8523-3ec97578c5c9.jpg" /> is a trapping site, we let<img src="1-1300065\9156abae-5f24-4a26-8a9a-812369a4fb52.jpg" />, so that the summation above is not restricted to the untrapped sites. We also assume that the initial configurations on the walkers are such that the <img src="1-1300065\139c86c9-5643-4341-97f5-50486afdb4dc.jpg" /> walkers occupy all the untrapped sites. To account for randomization we calculate the mean survival probability,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2249"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\daaf5745-d388-4129-84ca-365161dd4e8e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-1300065\259681eb-f50f-48a9-b790-528fd909a9c3.jpg" /> denotes the number of different configurations. Recall we assumed the <img src="1-1300065\3f0c011f-2ab5-45c7-ab6c-24334b17f7d0.jpg" /> walkers are distinguishable and uncorrelated, so the evolution of the Mparticle walk is equivalent to a single-particle walk with an ensemble of initial configurations. So by quantum computation of the single-particle distribution, the classical survival probability is useful.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Analysis of the Survival Probability of M-Walkers with Phase Parameters</title><p>In this section we numerically analyze the dynamics of the survival probability in the two-dimensional multiparticle quantum walk with phase parameters. Firstly, we investigate the survival probability for three different initial states with fixed phase parameters. Initial chirality states of untrapped cites are chosen as in the first case, <img src="1-1300065\e437f688-ed4b-4aab-8668-87e97cf7d013.jpg" />, in the second case <img src="1-1300065\e98bec10-3a3b-484c-923a-dbf7372117a5.jpg" /> sequentially and in the last case, randomly chosen either of <img src="1-1300065\b248efc5-70af-4edd-8ec7-7679fc1b83ae.jpg" /> or<img src="1-1300065\58444287-3e20-432d-9347-560120c1b68a.jpg" />. We call them left, sequential and mixed initializations respectively. In numeric simulations, the number of sites on the square lattice is taken to be<img src="1-1300065\49aa6515-0afe-4340-99d4-fb8e655d38aa.jpg" />. To account for random distribution of traps, a statistical configurational average of the mean survival probability is calculated over different independent realizations of the initial system with <img src="1-1300065\117ce04a-fd74-49a1-9554-0cf214a6fba8.jpg" /> different configurations. We should remark that the coin operator governing the walk is given by<img src="1-1300065\366e9a1a-2939-4778-b559-9b3cf82b7e66.jpg" />, where <img src="1-1300065\8aef916b-9269-46b5-86ec-b16c5180ab2a.jpg" /> is a two-dimensional generalization of the Fibonacci operator and <img src="1-1300065\23835976-c255-463b-bf5c-2410d1348f15.jpg" /> is the diagonal phase adjustment (see Section 2 for details).</p><p>Survival probability of QW are plotted in Figures 1(a)-(c) for left, sequential and mixed initializations and for different trap densities <img src="1-1300065\b4054256-dcee-42e2-9e04-b487dce257fd.jpg" /> and <img src="1-1300065\827ae04b-1d97-44da-b925-391679da1c03.jpg" /> with arbitrary fixed phase parameters<img src="1-1300065\968da63e-7589-48de-85ec-f6a73d9feace.jpg" />. Figures are plotted in the double logarithmic scale. We see that the survival probability decreases in time and is less at higher trap densities. All different initializations show same behavior and the survival probability is seen to exhibit a linear dependence on time in the double logarithmic scale. When we fit the lines to the curves in the time regime, line fits obey the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts stretched exponential function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref19">19</xref>] which is given by,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.32825-formula2250"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1300065\dad4f314-e829-4153-9280-f131f1d48398.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where exponent <img src="1-1300065\48e80c5c-1cfd-4021-8dc7-0ec6a3931ae3.jpg" /> determines the decay rate of the sur-</p><p>vival probability. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows that the survival probability of the Fibonacci walk with phase parameters evaluate with time as stretched exponential obey to Equation (1). As it can be seen form <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, there’s no qualitatively different dynamical regime in decay of the survival probability of the quantum walk for long time regime. Whereas, in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref12">12</xref>], authors have found that the time decay of the survival probability of the Hadamard walk in the trapped space has qualitatively different dynamical regime for different initial configuration of the walker states. They have explained the time crossover behavior in dynamical regime as transition from Rosenstock to the Donkser and Varadhan regime. In short time regime in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the numerical error appears which may probably cause from insufficient statistical average due to lack of computational ability of our personal computer. If the time crossover was being in the survival probability it would be appear for example at the trap density<img src="1-1300065\344d32cc-6e32-450f-a868-74a58f0d863f.jpg" />. Indeed, the survival probability curves for all trap densities and different initial configurations systematically show the linear behavior in the double logarithmic scale for relatively long time regime. Furthermore, the numerical anomaly of the survival probability lines in the short time regime can be affected by the phase parameter<img src="1-1300065\4070f2b1-ceb5-4b92-8148-ac5009e40edf.jpg" />. On the other hand, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> does not clearly give any information about depending of the decay parameters <img src="1-1300065\eb730583-d397-4eec-b7c9-8d446336fd4c.jpg" /> on phase parameters while it gives some information about depending of the exponent <img src="1-1300065\7366524c-3b9e-4592-891d-32f3e4917286.jpg" /> on the trap density<img src="1-1300065\1e0fcc96-b290-4bf6-ac10-671247437513.jpg" />. Therefore, in order to clarify the trap density dependence of the decay rate <img src="1-1300065\4eb54227-f68d-4a62-a4a7-5162499f48ec.jpg" /> for different initializations and fixed phase parameters, <img src="1-1300065\1277ee6a-f088-4e03-82dc-662b6c2ea481.jpg" />is plotted versus the trap density <img src="1-1300065\7322d755-c9c1-4f5c-aa36-0a93a649c7ed.jpg" /> in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. It can be seen from this figure that stretched exponential parameter <img src="1-1300065\58584ac7-c37b-41e8-afb2-9396ca7992d1.jpg" /> of the survival probability of quantum walk depends on trap density. Indeed it exhibits almost a linear dependence on trap density for all different initializations and fixed phase parameters <img src="1-1300065\0c807632-2b10-417f-8df3-06a6f0c4d4c9.jpg" /> <img src="1-1300065\a28b06f8-2a78-4e39-a56a-92cbda1026e0.jpg" />. Clearly <img src="1-1300065\3f725e5c-5d34-43ef-a1ee-974fce4c96d5.jpg" /> increases with increasing trap density. Similar behavior for Hadamard walk on the one dimensional randomly trapped lattice has been observed in the Donkser and Varadhan regime in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>In order to further investigate and clarify the phase parameter dependence of the decay parameter <img src="1-1300065\09042865-c849-41db-bdca-a089c903cf0a.jpg" /> we will consider different phase combination for quantum walk on the two dimensional randomly trapped lattice. However here we have considered only left initialization since it has been shown in Figures 1 and 2 that the stretched exponential parameter <img src="1-1300065\6ef98817-7388-411d-a3c5-2e1a49ce5ed4.jpg" /> of survival probability almost linearly increases with increasing trap density for all initializations at fixed phase parameters. For four different combination of the parameter, the time dependence of the survival probability of quantum walk has been plotted in Figures 3(a)-(d) in the double logarithmic scale for several trap densities. For the trap den-</p><p><img src="1-1300065\148930f5-663f-440d-8a75-5d55412dfa85.jpg" />in the cases of the left, sequential and mixed initializations.</p><p><img src="1-1300065\2a0141ab-08b4-4c96-96cf-42aba6151d27.jpg" />; (d)<img src="1-1300065\ffc40850-d2d8-4303-b39b-deee074485c9.jpg" />.</p><p>sities <img src="1-1300065\db3d3840-0990-46ef-9c37-2e62b67d678b.jpg" /> <img src="1-1300065\c876df53-d90f-41a6-91c1-fbb0d2a9bb3d.jpg" /> and<img src="1-1300065\ebf28cd4-765a-4fa1-8a9a-6f0c3ce01a55.jpg" />, we have chosen different phase parameter combinations in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) as<img src="1-1300065\a1682e0e-ec8e-4847-be44-28bf1316a4ba.jpg" />, in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b) as<img src="1-1300065\913607ba-da05-46a4-b521-bbc25d5c90ba.jpg" />, in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c) as <img src="1-1300065\e33c27c2-25b6-4eca-8191-86864d241052.jpg" /> and finally in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d) as<img src="1-1300065\6cc6ecbe-78af-4cda-8a9e-294d736a89ac.jpg" />. As it can be seen from all subfigures of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the time behavior of the survival probability of the Fibonacci walks with different phase combination on the trapped space obey to stretched exponential law. Furthermore, this figures also shows that time dependence of the survival probability of walks are affected by phase combinations. Indeed, it clearly seems that the survival probability curves in Figures 3(a) and (b) are quite different that of Figures 3(c) and (d). To see the phase parameter dependence of the stretched exponential parameter<img src="1-1300065\94eaee3e-6f49-4d92-b7bb-ebb925588c2b.jpg" />, we have plotted survival probability for the different phase combinations at fixed trap densities in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. As it can be seen that the slopes of the survival probability curves for the three different phase combination fixed density <img src="1-1300065\3664bb74-3b10-439f-b3fe-29d9ee056593.jpg" /> in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a). For example, while the curves for the phase combinations <img src="1-1300065\9ab1f205-9b5d-492d-bb19-19be2d433568.jpg" /> and <img src="1-1300065\831abcd4-18be-4dd6-b6cb-b1338b1c0f00.jpg" /> are almost coincident, they are quite different for the phase combinations <img src="1-1300065\43d83ab6-cd15-41cc-bfdf-1737ead326cb.jpg" /> and<img src="1-1300065\5e60bfc7-5e0b-499d-b28e-d2d283e44d1f.jpg" />. Similar behavior for different phase combination at fixed trap density value <img src="1-1300065\48ac8108-bb42-4b98-8fd9-477899359f38.jpg" /> appears in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b). These numerical results demonstrate that the stretched exponential parameter <img src="1-1300065\57867d62-8839-445e-ab54-65057a5a1857.jpg" /> of the survival probability of the quantum walks depends on the combination of the phase parameters.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> the phase parameter dependence of the <img src="1-1300065\9dac6a3e-147e-48b9-b71f-f05ee9cba1af.jpg" /> is given for several combinations of the phase parameters which used in Figures 3 and 4. As it can be seen this</p><p>figure that the decay parameter <img src="1-1300065\ff655c54-0a27-4dfd-87d0-650b2666b4b5.jpg" /> dramatically changes due to phase combination. For all different phase parameters the decay parameter <img src="1-1300065\f23da81d-d4a2-481c-8027-24e771ac0583.jpg" /> almost linearly increases with increasing trap density.</p><p>These results show that the phase variables of the coin operator of walkers can be used as an control parameter to adjust the decay rate of the survival probability of the quantum walk on the trapped lattice for all initial states of walkers.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, the coin operator was taken to be a parametrization of the usual quantum walk governed by a two-dimensional generalization of the Fibonacci operator and by adapting the exact numeration method of Havlin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.32825-ref18">18</xref>] we have calculated the survival probability in a two-dimensional quantum walk with phase parameters on a trapped lattice. We have shown that the survival probability of the quantum walk decays with time obey to the stretched exponential law for all initial states of walkers. On the other hand we have shown that stretched exponential decay parameter <img src="1-1300065\52da9155-3631-41a6-a283-80f96c304254.jpg" /> can be arranged by phase parameter combination. Obtained numerical results provide that phase parameters can be used as an control parameter to determine the decay rate of the survival probability of the quantum walk.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was partially supported by the Istanbul University under Project No: 28432.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.32825-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Agliari, “Trapping of Continuous-Time Quantum Walks on Erd&amp;#246;s-Rényi Graphs,” Physica A, Vol. 390, No. 11, 2011, pp. 1853-1860.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Zahringer, G. Kirchmair, R. Gerritsma, E. Solano, R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, “Realization of a Quantum Walk with One and Two Trapped Ions,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 104, No. 10, 2010, Article ID: 100503.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Schmitz, R. Matjeschk, Ch. Schneider, J. Glueckert, M. Enderlein, T. Huber and T. Schaetz, “Quantum Walk of a Trapped Ion in Phase Space,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 103, No. 9, 2009, Article ID: 090504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Xue, B. C. Sanders and D. Leibfried, “Quantum Walk on a Line for a Trapped Ion,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 103, No. 18, 2009, Article ID: 183602. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.183602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Agliari, O. Mülken and A. Blumen, “Continuous-Time Quantum Walks and Trapping,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2010, pp. 271279.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Eckert, J. Mompart, G. Birkl and M. Lewenstein, “Oneand Two-Dimensional Quantum Walks in Arrays of Optical Traps,” Physical Review A, Vol. 72, No. 9, 2005, Article ID: 012327.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Wojcik, T. Luczak, P. Kurzynski, A. Grudka, T. Gdala, and M. Bednarska-Bzdega, “Trapping a Particle of a Quantum Walk on the Line,” Physical Review A, Vol. 85, No. 1, 2012, Article ID: 012329.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. G. Altmann and A. Endler, “Noise-Enhanced Trapping in Chaotic Scattering,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 105, No. 24, 2010, Article ID: 244102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Karski, L. F&amp;#246;rster, J. M. Choi, A. Steffen, W. Alt, D. Meschede and A. Widera, “Quantum Walk in Position Space with Single Optically Trapped Atoms,” Science, Vol. 325, No. 5937, 2009, pp. 174-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Xu, “Coherent Exciton Transport and Trapping on Long-Range Interacting Cycles,” Physical Review E, Vol. 79, No. 1, 2009, Article ID: 011117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. Mülken, A. Blumen, T. Amthor, C. Giese, M. ReetzLamour and M. Weidemueller, “Survival Probabilities in Coherent Exciton Transfer with Trapping,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 99, No. 9, 2007, Article ID: 090601.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. G&amp;#246;nülol, E. Aydiner, Y. Shikano and O. E. Müstecaplioglu, “Survival Probability in a One-Dimensional Quantum Walk on a Trapped Lattice,” New Journal of Physics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2011, Article ID: 033037.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. G&amp;#246;nülol, E. Aydiner and O. E. Müstecaplioglu, “Decoherence in Two-Dimensional Quantum Random Walks with Traps,” Physical Review A, Vol. 80, No. 2, 2009, Article ID: 022336.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Villagra, M. Nakanishi, S. Yamashita and Y. Nakashima, “Quantum Walks on the Line with Phase Parameters,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol. E95-D, No. 3, 2012, pp. 722-730.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Ampadu, “Limit Theorems for the Fibonacci Quantum Walk,” arXiv:1108.5198, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Ampadu, “M-Particle Quantum Walks with DeltaInteraction,” arXiv: 1105.6076, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Ampadu, “Localization of M-Particle Quantum Walks,” arXiv: 1106.5234, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Havlin, G. H. Weiss, J. E. Kiefer and M. Dishon, “Exact Enumeration of Random Walks with Traps,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1984, p. L347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.32825-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. C. Phillips, “Stretched Exponential Relaxation in Molecular and Electronic Glasses,” Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 59, No. 9, 1996, p. 1133.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>