<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.45093</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-31915</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Impact of Vector-Current Interactions on the QCD Phase Diagram
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>homas</surname><given-names>Hell</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouji</surname><given-names>Kashiwa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wolfram</surname><given-names>Weise</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>RIKEN/BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Physik Department, Technische Universit?t München, Garching, Germany; ECT*, Strada delle Tabarelle 286, Villazzano, Trento, Italy </addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>thell@ph.tum.de, thomas.hell@ph.tum.de(HH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>644</fpage><lpage>650</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>February</day>	<month>25,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>31,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Using a nonlocal version of the Polyakov-loop-extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, we investigate effects of a nonderivative vector-current interaction (relating to the quark-number density) at both real and imaginary chemical potentials. This repulsive vector interaction between quarks has the following impact on the chiral first-order phase transition: at imaginary chemical potential it sharpens the transition at the Roberge-Weiss (RW) end point and moves this critical point toward lower temperatures; at real chemical potential, the critical end point moves on a trajectory towards larger chemical potentials and lower temperatures with increasing vector coupling strength. The conditions are discussed at which the first-order phase transition disappears and turns into a smooth crossover. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>QCD Phase Diagram; PNJL Model</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Exploring the phase diagram of quantum chromo-dynamics (QCD) at finite temperature and real chemical potential is one of the most interesting and important subjects in particle and nuclear physics. Lattice-QCD (LQCD) simulations are a powerful method to investigate the QCD thermodynamics at zero chemical potential. At finite chemical potential, however, LQCD suffers from the so-called sign problem which restricts the applicability of LQCD to the region of small real chemical potential <img src="15-7501164\dd367cf3-8594-4aea-8d79-2656fe6afa5a.jpg" /> and high temperatures (see Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref1">1</xref>]). Therefore, model calculations (admittedly with substantial ambiguities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref2">2</xref>]) are used to investigate the phase structure at moderate and large<img src="15-7501164\cde6c7bc-19ef-4a3a-ac59-cba4a54cb31b.jpg" />.</p><p>A promising strategy for studying the QCD phase diagram at finite <img src="15-7501164\e05c248b-b424-4ba1-8b99-950de0088513.jpg" /> is the imaginary-chemical-potential matching approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref3">3</xref>]. It is similar to the usual imaginary chemical potential approach for LQCD [4-7]: LQCD data at finite imaginary chemical potential <img src="15-7501164\b7330df3-dde5-4f33-bb96-ce9d97ce3209.jpg" /> are extrapolated to the <img src="15-7501164\18f79ea7-8d28-4676-a0f3-0c5690c13fac.jpg" /> region by using an analytic function. In the imaginary-chemical-potential matching approach we extract some important restrictions for the model design from the <img src="15-7501164\51e4f5db-ec8f-4609-990e-e7faf62e0f34.jpg" /> region. This allows us to extend the model to the real-chemical-potential region more realistically (cf. Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref8">8</xref>]). The important point is that the <img src="15-7501164\7762ca85-29c6-4cae-9ffb-423fa7729561.jpg" /> region encodes almost all information of the <img src="15-7501164\1b7227fd-ebd6-4731-800b-64c1871178c4.jpg" /> region. This fact can be understood through a Fourier transformation of the grand-canonical partition function, <img src="15-7501164\4aba6582-e74c-44c6-9d27-b80f86996f31.jpg" />, in terms of <img src="15-7501164\92f38e98-0216-4fde-80a8-425845176f5f.jpg" /> in the case that the baryon number is a good quantum number:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39607"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\e7352432-a1fe-4bce-877e-fd3964101e62.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, <img src="15-7501164\e133e026-e296-4a4a-99e0-feef13211b80.jpg" />is the canonical partition function with real quark numbers (N<sub>q</sub>). Moreover, QCD possesses the so-called Roberge-Weiss (RW) periodicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref9">9</xref>]: thermodynamical quantities have a periodicity of <img src="15-7501164\88fd135b-c937-4c7d-9e85-40777003b3b0.jpg" /> along the <img src="15-7501164\15783d53-6561-465e-af8a-3fce87215cb7.jpg" />-axis. This periodicity is described by invariance under the extended <img src="15-7501164\a17ee88b-4dcd-4542-9c7b-a4b6faa2f58d.jpg" /> symmetry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref10">10</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39608"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\fd1004e5-d50a-4123-bb64-87fab74c3c90.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with integer<img src="15-7501164\d4ce5e4f-dc6a-4df5-85d0-72c289706dea.jpg" />, where <img src="15-7501164\d392f1f6-5b24-419c-92a7-c20c874e4d5b.jpg" /> is the Polyakov loop and <img src="15-7501164\1c1d34f6-33fe-44d3-bb18-eb54dc911b03.jpg" /> its conjugate. The RW periodicity enables us to determine which interactions are relevant and how strong the couplings are by comparing model results with LQCD data at finite<img src="15-7501164\a0b7a381-3b36-4bdf-83b2-dba54154e7ae.jpg" />. Note, that <img src="15-7501164\35860b62-58fd-43fc-95dd-4cc2ea2fbea4.jpg" /> can be absorbed in the boundary angle of the temporal direction of the quark field. From this viewpoint, quarks are fermions at <img src="15-7501164\d9e4e9ec-b6c8-4ee2-b82d-2424da29bd35.jpg" /> and these become boson-like at <img src="15-7501164\815b5b14-d17d-4923-acc8-96c79e750eca.jpg" />. Therefore, the dual quark condensate was proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref11">11</xref>] as an order parameter for the chiral and the deconfinement phase transition.</p><p>At <img src="15-7501164\daedd8ce-00f5-4acf-82e6-e34d9a5ff901.jpg" /> another characteristic property of QCD, the so-called RW transition, arises: this RW transition can be related to charge-conjugation <img src="15-7501164\e55a282e-3950-4951-b114-7297ddb46ae3.jpg" /> or <img src="15-7501164\be1ec2a8-58a6-45cb-9084-918a5cf4da85.jpg" /> symmetry breaking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref12">12</xref>]. <img src="15-7501164\6a09491d-0ee1-4ad8-9b61-8ad1880378c2.jpg" />symmetry is explicitly broken at finite<img src="15-7501164\6562f14b-4a7f-4173-80ac-54a831c88e9c.jpg" />, but it is not explicitly broken at <img src="15-7501164\c04fc92b-fcc2-4c98-b535-d36a842997ce.jpg" /> because of RW periodicity (see, e. g., Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref13">13</xref>]). On the RW transition line, <img src="15-7501164\544c2b76-c6b4-478f-b2a2-211fcf79ba9d.jpg" />-odd quantities can have a finite value, but they vanish for temperatures below the RW end point [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref9">9</xref>]. Therefore, we can interpret <img src="15-7501164\66a04a17-f32e-4249-88de-d45159339b20.jpg" />-odd quantities as order parameters of spontaneous <img src="15-7501164\37f8aa3d-a379-4694-bf68-d9c1a017ec79.jpg" />-symmetry breaking.</p><p>The Polyakov-loop-extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model is a promising approach as it preserves the RW periodicity in the same way as QCD. In the present study we extend the nonlocal version of the two-flavor PNJL model from Refs. [14,15] by introducing a nonderivative vector-current interaction between quarks both at imaginary and real chemical potentials.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we introduce the nonlocal PNJL model that is used in our calculations. In particular, we describe in detail the treatment of the vector-type interaction in the nonlocal framework. We show how this approach can be extended to imaginary chemical potentials. Section 3 presents the results of our calculations. Section 4 closes this work with a discussion and a summary.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Framework and Formalism</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Lagrangian Density and Nonlocality Distribution Functions</title><p>The generic Euclidean action of the two-flavor PNJL model is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39609"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\4c1ad96e-15f5-4a4e-a899-6868d84d06cb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="15-7501164\a1aaef53-54e5-4caa-8167-d9a3221249f6.jpg" /> is the two-flavor quark field, <img src="15-7501164\86be8e52-a452-44dc-9ae5-5bf42d208b86.jpg" />denotes the current quark mass, and</p><p><img src="15-7501164\b19df095-81bb-4f94-a681-d75d2aaa839a.jpg" />is the color gaugecovariant derivative with <img src="15-7501164\c3440039-691c-4904-baa2-708d8ca93c51.jpg" /> Gell-Mann matrices</p><p><img src="15-7501164\0e5eff8d-6160-432f-a9b5-c487dc99bf09.jpg" />. The gauge coupling <img src="15-7501164\4cbef9ac-5fa4-4c8c-858f-4ee8176e4a9f.jpg" /> is understood to be absorbed in the definition of<img src="15-7501164\74c6b4c9-1dc3-4869-9c53-a40338f5a09d.jpg" />.</p><p>The last term in Equation (3) is the Polyakov-loop-effective potential<img src="15-7501164\748236e4-7f54-40cd-8450-67566505f899.jpg" />, multiplied by volume <img src="15-7501164\22eaffe9-4a17-431d-89fa-23b555660dab.jpg" /> and inverse temperature<img src="15-7501164\3dda57e6-97e6-4519-bd8f-8a49a7fd31f0.jpg" />, and to be specified later. <img src="15-7501164\2ba0142f-3085-4b28-8b1d-765b932abfcc.jpg" />and <img src="15-7501164\88fc01fb-0301-4211-8e26-d10ec6a32c3b.jpg" /> are the Polyakov loop and its conjugate, respectively.</p><p>The nonlocal generalization of the PNJL model is characterized by an interaction featuring nonlocal quark currents and densities, as follows [14-18]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39610"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\97026642-6c0e-46fb-ae14-8adca5b76b8b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39611"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\37bd2665-87a6-4a6e-9cfa-c3cf79720555.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39612"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\d2536518-5a32-4009-8c4f-88e773f75dbf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39613"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\ff5e8316-eb76-4b0c-b1e8-e343e55a4e41.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The chiral (scalar and pseudoscalar) densities <img src="15-7501164\73229706-b0f3-4459-8b43-97e2029fde30.jpg" /> with <img src="15-7501164\818b0dd1-7b9a-424b-b788-f238c03c3db5.jpg" /> involve the operators<img src="15-7501164\ba40717f-ccab-4ec3-96b4-8dd177a363f4.jpg" />. The overall coupling strength G of dimension [length]<sup>2</sup> is chosen sufficiently large so that spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and pions as Goldstone bosons emerge properly. The term involving the nonlocal quark vector currents <img src="15-7501164\f964d15b-04e8-420f-9f40-42001adc2549.jpg" /> has a coupling strength<img src="15-7501164\3a5b0330-5398-4299-97b2-f921d47cc47e.jpg" />, again of dimension [length]<sup>2</sup>. This <img src="15-7501164\3999a430-6527-41a7-9d04-86eec56b504a.jpg" /> is treated as a parameter in the present work. For orientation, the Fierz transformation of a color-octet current-current interaction (induced, e.g., by gluon exchange) gives <img src="15-7501164\f3c56be5-f5ff-4f84-b264-a1b3eb66904b.jpg" /> (see, e.g., Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref8">8</xref>]).</p><p>The term involving <img src="15-7501164\c912332d-e65a-43fc-a050-e4da5aae4477.jpg" /> is an additional vector-type derivative coupling with</p><p><img src="15-7501164\7bab9c0d-478d-45fe-b2ac-fb3c8ab479c8.jpg" /></p><p>together with a scale <img src="15-7501164\9c942dff-12f1-44f5-987e-ccd5d9b04d95.jpg" /> so that the effective strength of this term in <img src="15-7501164\74548165-5943-48bc-a926-d38c8811517b.jpg" /> is<img src="15-7501164\43307dbf-dce2-4029-bb05-ec4b927088f8.jpg" />. In the following, we refer to the interaction induced by <img src="15-7501164\5ed2e3e0-384e-420d-9f2e-e5306364bd09.jpg" /> simply as a derivative coupling in order to avoid confusion with the nonderivative vector interaction which is called vector-current interaction from here on.</p><p>The currents Equations (5)-(7) include nonlocality distributions <img src="15-7501164\8ff69656-13fd-4492-876b-b7d232e69213.jpg" /> and<img src="15-7501164\bd6325fd-d653-4c0a-aa05-2fd0f04981a7.jpg" />. These distributions govern the momentum dependences of the quark mass function and of the renormalization factor that appears in the quark quasi-particle propagator,</p><p><img src="15-7501164\6abd52e8-5301-4af5-8d71-ecea7401f45a.jpg" />[8,15,17]. The Fourier transform <img src="15-7501164\4dc875d7-c2c6-4ff3-be1a-3aee452ec969.jpg" /> of <img src="15-7501164\4ababdf3-061b-4bb1-9ef1-e2a7f1b13652.jpg" /> is related to the quasi-particle mass function <img src="15-7501164\25ab31b6-2848-469f-a1ea-535262ac54a5.jpg" /> determined by the self-consistent gap equation,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39614"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\97786379-3d39-4f27-a619-372c58c6224c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="15-7501164\7902346c-03d0-4159-87e4-16524bd581a5.jpg" /> is the scalar mean field basically representing the chiral condensate<img src="15-7501164\00949f47-7b8c-49fc-baaf-812156274c12.jpg" />. The Fourier transform</p><p><img src="15-7501164\5e488a95-dd24-45b0-a699-a4d736b474ab.jpg" />of <img src="15-7501164\3a415000-83bf-47eb-bdfc-578748a28490.jpg" /> is, in turn, related to the Z factor of quark wave-function renormalization,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39615"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\d22ff9bc-d125-425c-bec6-3a18604452c5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="15-7501164\e7a267fc-5b8c-4076-bfea-055b90ab2231.jpg" /> is the mean field induced by <img src="15-7501164\a1a3a40f-554a-438e-8354-79d47d596a40.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>The following four-dimensional momentum-space forms of the distribution functions are used in this study:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39616"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\5f40409d-f31a-4f3b-8d9c-23d8a159b106.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39617"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\89faaa09-fbd5-444d-bfc8-c08c30965952.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The running QCD coupling <img src="15-7501164\8febb87a-0f02-42f4-8985-38ccfddbaaa2.jpg" /> determines the asymptotic form of <img src="15-7501164\1ab91169-121b-4db5-a1b8-e48ed20d15f4.jpg" /> while its infrared behavior is given by a Gaussian parameterization with a characteristic length scale<img src="15-7501164\7bfc3c7f-24ba-422c-8e9b-c6eafc7e8a1b.jpg" />. The matching of these highand low-momentum representations at an intermediate scale <img src="15-7501164\a8119687-ddce-417a-8885-8832d45b2e99.jpg" /> determines the constant<img src="15-7501164\43005e00-378e-4c51-91dd-d3b542c6e79f.jpg" />. Parameters in both distribution functions are fitted to LQCD data as described in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Thermodynamical Potential</title><p>Consider now the (grand-canonical) thermodynamical potential,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39618"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\bc27aa61-1636-4b19-9b13-4f6d08425b35.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39619"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\036058b6-5493-440f-a2b0-01bd5b37ac5a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the grand-canonical partition function determined by the path integral over the action (3). In the mean-field approximation the fields are replaced by their (thermal) expectation values. After bosonization, the mean-field thermodynamical potential, <img src="15-7501164\f09911e4-f370-461b-9658-30893039e2e0.jpg" />of the nonlocal PNJL model, including quark wave-function-renormalization corrections, but in the absence of the the vector-current interaction reads</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39620"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\d11ee9cd-8651-43a8-ba7d-fe0f113403d5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39621"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\2e3c86ef-1fc2-4593-b299-93e454435efd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <img src="15-7501164\6982c427-13f8-4ceb-83db-601dfde8fc5b.jpg" /> and <img src="15-7501164\cdf9037e-269d-4b5a-aac6-8721b7123d4d.jpg" /> are the mean fields associated with the scalar density <img src="15-7501164\d12b9af5-16d3-4961-9c57-ddca677544eb.jpg" /> and the derivative vector current<img src="15-7501164\e3950759-2603-4f79-bbd4-06ee4efeabd2.jpg" />, respectively. The first term on the right-hand side of Equation (15) involves the quark quasi-particle energies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39622"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\e6590ccf-5f2c-4de4-8039-595477bb6ab8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with dynamically generated masses,</p><p><img src="15-7501164\130aed8a-8170-43b1-b790-58a917545f7d.jpg" />, determined self-consistently at each shifted Matsubara frequency <img src="15-7501164\4d3b1ab6-f8d4-4c63-b065-3d962d027d09.jpg" /> with<img src="15-7501164\73b4725d-9143-4c92-ac23-183bb26aadee.jpg" />:</p><p><img src="15-7501164\c41b88b9-cb5d-44dd-bb6a-2fe6ccdb29fe.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39623"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\b6b0ce21-adee-459d-b4ce-d092a8d80ffe.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="15-7501164\08810192-c64f-48ee-b8c4-c045f559dca0.jpg" />are the gauge fields forming the Polyakov loop given in Equation (22). Likewise, the Z factors are understood as<img src="15-7501164\f4a9f073-4aff-4537-ac2a-6a8e4b0668ee.jpg" />. More explicitly:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39624"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\a3a8dac2-ec0d-4a06-886f-6382c6e2b1a8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39625"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\02cfa3f0-d291-4178-b7c5-c78436f99e55.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>At finite temperature<img src="15-7501164\67834ced-28f5-4ef1-b278-13c190a53543.jpg" />, the Lorentz invariance is broken by the thermal medium and the inverse quark quasi-particle propagator becomes</p><p><img src="15-7501164\b92e010c-5c63-49f8-b1f3-a347bec3e67f.jpg" />with</p><p><img src="15-7501164\d95b1e06-1fe9-40dd-8866-a46380bd3a0b.jpg" />. Here we assume for simplicity that the difference between <img src="15-7501164\a7791668-eedb-44b7-99ca-45f9a390cae7.jpg" /> and <img src="15-7501164\0e9f8296-c033-4393-af6e-7437f42dc1f1.jpg" /> is sufficiently small so that it can be neglected, given that the overall influence of wave-function renormalization on thermodynamical quantities is not very significant.</p><p>The introduction of the vector-current interaction leads to the following modifications of the thermodynamical potential (14): first, from the bosonization of Equation (6) a quadratic term involving the vector mean field<img src="15-7501164\79918520-e3ff-4759-a528-9832848ea17d.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39626"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\ff9dd2ea-12fc-4e9f-a7e7-5ae0f783215e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is added to the thermodynamical potential (15); second, the chemical potential is shifted according to</p><p><img src="15-7501164\49aa693e-f183-4ab8-9ca3-9fbfbaca83f5.jpg" />. The vector mean field basically represents the baryon density, <img src="15-7501164\63465943-f7e4-47f7-903c-ecd455c31568.jpg" />, in the form<img src="15-7501164\4a8aaf53-f51c-402a-bc46-24cf16d13462.jpg" />. One important remark is in order: the</p><p><img src="15-7501164\50cbe070-9c07-4a38-976e-623a3f3521fd.jpg" />-dependence does not appear in the distribution functions because these functions are introduced in the Lagrangian density before taking the mean-field approximation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Polyakov-Loop Potential</title><p>In this study, we consider two types of the Polyakov-loop effective potentials. The first one is given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref20">20</xref>]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39627"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\956adde0-ccf7-48cb-8e69-f88cdf2257e9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="15-7501164\bec72d19-f3e2-44cf-b063-93efeab99f47.jpg" /> and <img src="15-7501164\66c53d1d-cc58-4380-9008-ce6423835bba.jpg" /> are represented as</p><p><img src="15-7501164\41086964-b58b-4f6c-b842-a47f09c74dd8.jpg" /></p><p>(22)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39628"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\8d189db0-b3d0-4b6a-81dd-4c6fdaf6de29.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The other one is proposed in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref21">21</xref>]:</p><p><img src="15-7501164\17fa6a8d-01e5-46b0-a465-ae0b8fc05c31.jpg" /></p><p>(24)</p><p>This latter form is obtained from the knowledge of the strong-coupling limit of QCD. Recently the details have been investigated in Ref. [22,23]. The nonlocal PNJL model with potential (21) is henceforth denoted as model A and that with potential (24) as model B.</p><p>It is convenient to introduce a modified Polyakov-loop and its conjugate as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31915-formula39629"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="15-7501164\183e4f49-79d5-4e5c-bbe2-67a7a2791c34.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>as these are RW-periodic quantities. The real and imaginary parts of <img src="15-7501164\c3fa9a46-4dad-48b5-8f7a-4c21a86e727e.jpg" /> serve as order parameters of the deconfinement transition and spontaneous <img src="15-7501164\42ed6f14-03ee-428c-8d42-979fb2125bc5.jpg" />-symmetry breaking because <img src="15-7501164\94ead46c-9db0-4a8e-8e29-0b4ca932b2a5.jpg" /> is a <img src="15-7501164\677bcf4a-bae4-45a9-b939-e0225161d067.jpg" />-odd quantity, just like the quark number density. We use <img src="15-7501164\21c3b714-655a-47e9-a102-d8c8a69c2bf9.jpg" /> as the order parameter of <img src="15-7501164\65e470d2-821d-4b9a-a138-b05bc3798f9f.jpg" />-symmetry breaking. As mentioned in the introduction, this <img src="15-7501164\9ce2d8fa-717a-45a3-8944-5dddd6721d9a.jpg" />-odd quantity serves as an exact order parameter at <img src="15-7501164\d5572d4c-b9c1-4e4c-a1ac-72f27a5bc5d5.jpg" /> because there <img src="15-7501164\f9cfacb5-0a86-4ca9-8aa1-cfdb405e2316.jpg" />-symmetry is not explicitly broken.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Parameter Setting</title><p>In the PNJL model the pion mass and its decay constant are used to fix parameters in the NJL sector of the Lagrangian. These parameters are taken from Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref15">15</xref>]. The vector-current interaction, at mean-field level, has no influence on the thermodynamics at<img src="15-7501164\e363a193-a5a9-4ecb-86a4-498146a39088.jpg" />. An estimate of the coupling constant <img src="15-7501164\aaff3a24-813a-4809-86a8-0d4c3b7c0ea2.jpg" /> can therefore only be provided by comparison with (restricted) LQCD information at nonzero chemical potential. For guidance, we can use the LQCD value for the ratio <img src="15-7501164\ab07bec6-26e0-4d5f-bfb8-e14d1fb0a2e9.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref4">4</xref>], where <img src="15-7501164\3622130e-b560-4af8-8c89-a45ffb44aa11.jpg" /> is the critical temperature of the Roberge-Weiss end point (at<img src="15-7501164\f4bab105-a89f-4fb0-9017-dd9d41074653.jpg" />) and <img src="15-7501164\5d3b76ec-94fb-408f-8439-3d8ca755457a.jpg" /> is the crossover temperature at<img src="15-7501164\7877a08a-75d7-4991-9216-29134fe09aea.jpg" />.</p><p>The coefficient functions <img src="15-7501164\532985f3-ce45-4828-bf05-c9002c4a5cc5.jpg" /> and <img src="15-7501164\8f45f967-6713-4707-a04a-72bcc68ad771.jpg" /> in (24) are parameterized such as to reproduce pure-gaugeLQCD results (Refs. [15,16]). When we use T<sub>0</sub> = 270 MeV for the confinement-deconfinement transition temperature in the pure-gauge case, the resulting crossover transition temperature when including quarks in the PNJL model is slightly higher than the LQCD prediction. Alternatively, we also use <img src="15-7501164\49783753-359b-410e-b7c3-04b6d9824622.jpg" /> in order to reproduce<img src="15-7501164\ff4c9c31-e4c3-4ae7-bced-5d4365053355.jpg" />, as suggested in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>The parameter <img src="15-7501164\6d214282-6bd4-4e51-aea9-17984263e893.jpg" /> in (24) is fitted to reproduce the critical temperature in the pure gauge limit and its value is a = 664 MeV. The remaining parameter <img src="15-7501164\291bb31e-6864-46a8-8f74-5ed76704dbcc.jpg" /> is defined to reproduce the pseudo-critical temperature with dynamical quarks. To reproduce <img src="15-7501164\720f0ee2-3aa2-4fa9-812d-14bb7580310b.jpg" /> from the two-flavor LQCD data, we take<img src="15-7501164\5c4bad9d-bc73-4243-bed5-cea4273d8765.jpg" />.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Numerical Results</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> displays the <img src="15-7501164\653ac6a1-f6f5-4fbd-bb48-938282892b5c.jpg" />-dependence of the chiral order parameter and the real part of<img src="15-7501164\f95ecb2b-43b1-4fd8-9b77-6ca32d043eef.jpg" />. Here we show the results of model A with <img src="15-7501164\2128501a-da42-479e-b86f-8ec0020208d4.jpg" /> and <img src="15-7501164\6b7a4767-f966-432b-8194-391eac4e8782.jpg" /> and that of model B with <img src="15-7501164\0f31c404-4541-4c40-b71d-489210bc9d22.jpg" /> and <img src="15-7501164\21bb2b51-fb99-4b60-b05a-d9f4c71a7faa.jpg" /> at<img src="15-7501164\16af00af-5127-472c-8238-a0c898052fea.jpg" />, in both cases with<img src="15-7501164\fef48edd-a2ad-45db-b5f6-e68ad79d3153.jpg" />.In all cases the transitions are crossovers. The transition temperatures for the chiral and deconfinement crossovers almost coincide. This property comes from the entanglement of the chiral and deconfinement transitions through the nonlocality distribution functions.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the T-dependence of <img src="15-7501164\bd093b3e-39bf-4fae-acb1-f20737a7249b.jpg" /> at <img src="15-7501164\a7649a42-54b4-440b-bd6f-c6ae4f9a0642.jpg" />. From the right figure we see that there is a first-order RW end point in the case of <img src="15-7501164\052f8c20-2a92-48c9-95c9-4a3f970b127f.jpg" /> which turns into second-order for<img src="15-7501164\aa4c4090-e31d-4eb2-8360-0cff26d9e80a.jpg" />. The LQCD data [25,26] suggest that the order of the RW end point is first-order at sufficiently small<img src="15-7501164\0ff1610c-d98a-4cff-8d45-6ae45bf49e45.jpg" />. From this perspective, <img src="15-7501164\6ac4b907-09d2-410f-a20b-3bb3e5fb7b88.jpg" />is not a suitable choice, but this situation can be modified as shown below.</p><p>In the previous figures we have ignored the vectorcurrent interaction. As a consequence, the ratio <img src="15-7501164\4c32db70-e1d8-4ef2-bcaf-4df0f9663403.jpg" /> exceeds the LQCD prediction [4,7]. Choosing G<sub>v</sub> = 0.4 G in model A with T<sub>0</sub> = 240 MeV, this ratio becomes <img src="15-7501164\ee1e7908-2f36-4d64-acf1-9b89f9c67a50.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref8">8</xref>]. Model B with G<sub>v</sub> = 0.4 G and b = 0.01 leads to<img src="15-7501164\a8961cfe-0428-48ee-ac82-f3b524d6d30d.jpg" />. These values are close to the LQCD result. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows again the T-dependence of the imaginary part of the modified Polyakov loop<img src="15-7501164\d632c443-7ef7-4bd1-bcb1-c87f3d92561a.jpg" />. One observes that the transition at <img src="15-7501164\1a290fb5-7244-485e-a0ec-eb4511967061.jpg" /> becomes first-order when introducing the vector-current interaction in model B with<img src="15-7501164\a534d0a5-c0bc-49e0-9120-9f85e1b581da.jpg" />. Henceforth, we only refer to the results of model A as both models lead to almost identical results.</p><p>Finally, we study the <img src="15-7501164\92d93817-2674-4289-abb8-4e612d8bf042.jpg" />-dependence of the position of these critical point in the <img src="15-7501164\77d37417-44a3-498d-b0d0-6ae3636a246f.jpg" />phase diagram. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, the circles and triangles represent the positions of the critical end points for the nonlocal version of the PNJL model, respectively. Results are presented for</p><p><img src="15-7501164\c4c97a57-a8b6-4842-b7db-265e4ff6cfa6.jpg" />and<img src="15-7501164\2187a021-02b7-4358-89e6-9e640eb3aa91.jpg" />, respectively. In the local PNJL model, the critical end point disappears or shifts to very small <img src="15-7501164\95499f30-74d0-4221-8f08-d2ae783ad062.jpg" /> when considering a realistic range <img src="15-7501164\b2fcbead-63cf-492f-b642-9f817a2ac6a3.jpg" /> for the vector coupling strength. In the nonlocal PNJL model, the location of the critical point has a less pronounced dependence on temperature, at least for small<img src="15-7501164\c5528dce-275e-4ba1-9f40-43502b7c0c00.jpg" />. This behavior can be traced to the weakening of the NJL interaction by the nonlocality distribution. The downward trajectory of the critical point becomes very steep, however, once <img src="15-7501164\c961ba59-1811-4116-b4e7-a700ad393a90.jpg" /> reaches values of 0.4 and beyond (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Around <img src="15-7501164\73fa6f1a-c71e-40a4-9684-494ee259ae73.jpg" />, the canonical ratio corresponding to an effective quark-quark interaction induced by color-octet (gluon-exchange) currents, the critical points tends to disappear altogether and the first-order phase transition turns into a continuous crossover.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Summary</title><p>In this study we have investigated the impact of a (nonderivative) vector-current interaction in the nonlocal PNJL model at real and imaginary chemical potentials. The presence of the vector-current interaction makes the transition at the Roberge-Weiss end point more pronounced. The RW end point becomes first-order, consistent with recent LQCD simulations.</p><p>The location of the critical point in the phase diagram for real chemical potentials is highly sensitive to the vector coupling strength<img src="15-7501164\80eef171-9780-44a7-861b-c93a7b81304c.jpg" />. In the nonlocal PNJL model used here, the critical point tends to be eliminated in favor of a continuous crossover once the ratio of vectorto-scalar couplings is increased toward and beyond<img src="15-7501164\b7ee8225-739c-417d-98cc-10ba49611ed5.jpg" />, the value characteristic of an effective gluon-exchange interaction between quarks. Qualitatively similar tendencies are found in recent related work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref27">27</xref>] and in a <img src="15-7501164\d6ad1029-638a-4974-b7fc-52fa9ffc9333.jpg" />-flavor study using the local PNJL model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31915-ref28">28</xref>] in which the disappearance of the chiral first-order transition turning to a crossover is indicated already at values<img src="15-7501164\f21b7db7-7513-4611-a493-3e00eb4de93c.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>K. K. thanks H. Kouno and M. Yahiro for fruitful discussions. K. K. is supported by RIKEN Special Postdoctoral Researchers Program. T. H. acknowledges the kind hospitality at Brookhaven National Laboratory during his stay. This work is supported in part by BMBF, by the Excellence Cluster “Origin and Structure of the Universe”, and by DFG and NSFC through CRC 110.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.31915-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. de Forcrand, PoS (LAT2009), Vol. 010, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, T. Sakaguchi, M. Matsuzaki and M. Yahiro, Physics Letters B, Vol. 647, 2007, p. 446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Kashiwa, M. Matsuzaki, H. Kouno, Y. Sakai and M. Yahiro, Physical Review D, Vol. 79, 2009, Article ID: 076008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.076008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 642, 2002, p. 290.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, Physical Review D, Vol. 67, 2003, Article ID: 014505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. S. Chen and X. Q. Luo, Physical Review D, Vol. 72, 2005, Article ID: 034504.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. L. Wu, X. Q. Luo and H. S. Chen, Physical Review D, Vol. 76, 2005, Article ID: 034505.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Kashiwa, T. Hell and W. Weise, Physical Review D, Vol. 84, 2011, Article ID: 056010.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.056010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Roberge and N. Weiss, Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 275, 1986, p. 734. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90582-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno and M. Yahiro, Physical Review D, Vol. 77, 2008, Article ID: 051901.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.051901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Bilgici, F. Bruckmann, C. Gattringer and C. Hagen, Physical Review D, Vol. 77, 2005, Article ID: 094007.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.094007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Kashiwa, T. Sasaki, H. Kouno and M. Yahiro, 2012.  
arXiv:1208.2283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Kouno, Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa and M. Yahiro, Journal of Physics G, Vol. 36, 2009, p. 1150.  
doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/11/115010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Hell, S. Roessner and W. Weise, Physical Review D, Vol. 79, 2009, Article ID: 014022.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.014022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Hell, K. Kashiwa and W. Weise, Physical Review D, Vol. 83, 2011, Article ID: 114008.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Hell, S. Roessner, M. Cristoforetti and W. Weise, Physical Review D, Vol. 81, 2010, Article ID: 074034.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.074034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. A. Contrera, M. Orsaria and N. N. Scoccola, Physical Review D, Vol. 82, 2010, Article ID: 054026.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.054026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Pagura, D. Gomez Dumm and N. N. Scoccola, 2011. 
arXiv:1105.1739</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Noguera and N. N. Scoccola, Physical Review D, Vol. 78, 2008, Article ID: 114002.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.114002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Ratti, S. Roessner, M. Thaler and W. Weise, European Physical Journal, Vol. C49, 2007, p. 213.  
doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0065-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Fukushima, Physics Letters B, Vol. 591, 2004, p. 277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Sasaki and K. Redlich, 2012. arXiv:1204.4330</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Ruggieri, P. Alba, P. Castorina, S. Plumari, C. Ratti and V. Greco, 2012. arXiv:1204.5995</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B.-J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski and J. Wambach, Physical Review D, Vol. 76, 2007, Article ID: 074023.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.074023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Bonati, G. Cossu, M. D’Elia and F. San_lippo, Physical Review D, Vol. 83, 2011, Article ID: 054505.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.054505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Bonati, P. de Forcrand, G. Cossu, M. D’Elia, O. Philipsen and F. San_lippo, 2012. arXiv:1201.2769</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Contrera, A. Grunfeld and D. Blaschke, 2012.  
arXiv:1207.4890</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31915-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. M. Bratovic, T. Hatsuda and W. Weise, 2012. 
arXiv:1204.3788</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>