<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.45085</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-31594</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Extra Dimensions Corrections for Fermionic Casimir Effect in Three Dimensional Box
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>eru</surname><given-names>Sukamto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Agus</surname><given-names>Purwanto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Theoretical Physics and Natural Philosophy Laboratorium, 
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>herusukamto@physics.its.ac.id(ES)</email>;<email>purwanto@physics.its.ac.id(AP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>597</fpage><lpage>603</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>February</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>March</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>April</day>	<month>25,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   We want to show extra-dimensions corrections for Fermionic Casimir Effect. Firstly, we determined quantization fermion field in Three dimensional Box. Then we calculated the Casimir energy for massless fermionic field confined inside a three-dimensional rectangular box with one compact extra-dimension. We use the MIT bag model boundary condition for the confinement and M<sup>4</sup> &#215; S<sup>1</sup> as the background spacetime. We use the direct mode summation method along with the Abel-Plana formula to compute the Casimir energy. We show analytically the extra-dimension corrections to the Fermionic Casimir effect to forward a new method of exploring the existence of the extra dimensions of the universe. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Casimir; Fermionic; Extra Dimensions</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Casimir effects, first discovered in 1948 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31594-ref1">1</xref>], are manifestation of the zero-point energies of the quantum fields and have played an important role on a variety of fields of physics. It discovered by Hendrick Casimir. He showed that zero-point fluctuations in electromagnetic fields gave rise to an attractive force between parallel, perfectly conducting plates. Since spacetimes with extra dimensions are fundamental in most of theories of high energy physics, there have been intensive activities in investigating the Casimir effect in spacetime with extra dimensions. The case of a scalar field and electromagnetic field with various boundary conditions has been studied at either zero or finite temperature, for different extra-dimensional spacetimes such as Kaluza-Klein spacetime and RandallSundrum spacetime [2-3]. For fermionic field, there has been calculated Casimir energy in three-dimensional box [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31594-ref4">4</xref>]. There also has been calculated Casimir energy between parallel plates with compact dimensions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31594-ref5">5</xref>]. Then, in this paper we investigate the extra-dimension correction to fermionic Casimir energy in three-dimensional box to explore the existence of extra-dimensions of our universe.</p><p>This article is organized as follows: In Section 2 we present the solution to the Dirac equation in 5D subject to the MIT bag model boundary condition in all the surfaces. Then we compute the Casimir energy by performing a direct sum over all modes of the field using the Abel-Plana summation formula. As we shall show, there will be no need for any analytic continuation techniques in this case. There will be influenced from extra dimension on the nature of Casimir energy between the configuration boundary that confine the field in the spacetimes with extra dimensions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Dirac Field 5D Confined in Three-Dimensional Cube</title><p>We consider a quantum fermionic field <img src="7-7501243\6bc94c51-2427-4843-b9d3-6984a5952fe0.jpg" /> on (3 + 1 + 1)-dimensional spacetimes with <img src="7-7501243\7b047847-e20e-43c1-842c-d478ea703a5d.jpg" /> manifold.<sub></sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137328"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\2a06c539-435b-4374-ab53-d4abb20de924.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The field <img src="7-7501243\e94fd13e-7f60-4115-a745-4be836d3f808.jpg" /> is assumed to satisfy the general compactification</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137329"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\4ab31fea-b074-4384-9d2a-21b4616617ac.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where R is the size of extra dimension. The field Ψ satisfy 5D Dirac equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137330"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\5f586ee7-dcd8-4337-a196-6af8e495d3ca.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using the chiral representation of Dirac matrices</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137331"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\aeaa994d-0b91-4ece-b5df-ed73dab1df65.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <img src="7-7501243\b0ac63fa-e280-49f7-b902-9a53d2aaa394.jpg" />[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31594-ref6">6</xref>]. The positive energy solution of the 5D Dirac equation can be written respectively as <sub></sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137332"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\6a8f9718-dcf6-406b-a7b6-04c4ec2e3f9f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Spinor<sub> <img src="7-7501243\f7dda027-3216-403a-bf00-a7c931c438f7.jpg" /> </sub>are given by<sub></sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137333"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\254d97e0-65da-4f96-9355-20b16a4cb71c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137334"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\5ddf6a2c-02f7-448a-a151-ece722b6f92f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The MIT bag model boundary condition is usually said to imply that there is no flux of fermions through the boundary. The prevalent form of the MIT bag model boundary condition is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137335"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\076f245b-3cc2-40f2-88e3-bb13e0edf9df.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This boundary condition for our special case becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137336"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\be4c23ca-49b8-435d-8843-e3415f57bd03.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<sub> <img src="7-7501243\0cd2bbae-ee7c-431d-a45e-fe509849f8a8.jpg" /> </sub>denote the lengths of the sides of the box. Subtituting Equations (6) and (7) into Equation (9) we obtain, for example, the following two equation for <img src="7-7501243\59049984-b64f-4a9d-9def-2dbfe8511444.jpg" /> surface:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137337"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\d7567377-aa50-4b83-89d7-b7a928ce9b72.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for<img src="7-7501243\35fe3623-8565-4119-9df3-1ec154cb1ec1.jpg" />,<sub> </sub>we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137338"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\e84e4d5b-22e5-4aeb-b8fc-6a59b60cbd00.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and for<img src="7-7501243\4fc471e3-acce-4710-bba3-b600af402901.jpg" />, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137339"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\fa4dd100-b0cd-445c-9216-eaa9be4526a8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Comparing (11) with (12), we find that in order to have nontrivial solutions for<img src="7-7501243\e00b4700-438b-4702-8706-ff91cfd17baf.jpg" />, one requires k<sub>1</sub> to satisfy a transcendental equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137340"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\a71bf9a6-ec73-48f2-80e0-55add2db89cf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>by setting<sub> <img src="7-7501243\fbf92bfe-a591-493d-9942-85d6dd572b05.jpg" /> </sub>for massless Dirac field, the<sub> </sub>quantization condition Equation (13) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137341"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\8798ee57-4582-4ca8-8e23-49111d6a28bf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Casimir Fermionic Energy in Three-Dimensional Cube at M<sub>4</sub> &#215; S<sub>1</sub></title><p>From this point, we concentrate on the massless case with<img src="7-7501243\da8af7fb-6b75-4e77-b9a5-eaf96d376089.jpg" />, for simplicity. By using the second quantized form of Dirac field, the vacuum expectation value of the free Hamiltonian can be expressed in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137342"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\7febcb51-b903-4ca6-a48b-e5275cd896ec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where summation index runs over the spin states and subscripts FV stands for free vacuum. In the presence of the boundaries, all of components of the momentum are subjected to quantization condition Equation (14). Therefore the integrals turn into summations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137343"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\436a41df-4010-4191-be6f-23f0e8bae1fd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where E<sub>BV</sub> denotes the vacuum energy in the presence of the boundaries. Obviously, in both situations the vacuum energy is divergent. However, the Casimir energy, which is the difference between these two quantities, is usually expected to be finite. One usually needs to utilize a regulation prescription to give a physical meaning to such a difference. In this paper we choose a modified form of the Abel-Plana formula, which is useful for the summation over half-integer numbers</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137344"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\3b0a1739-9792-4c4f-95e5-de5483ee4ed8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where F(z) is assumed to be an analytic function in the right half-plane. The first term is the main term of turning a sum into an integral. The second term is called branchcut term. Since we have a four sum over for Equation (16), we need to apply the Abel-Plana formula four times. The details are given in the Appendix. The final result is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137345"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\fdd2d2b7-c3ac-49b0-b691-a454ca975be7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<img src="7-7501243\e6543015-5f99-4a06-b5bc-7f1652db5853.jpg" />. It is extremely important to note that the only divergent quantity in Equation (18) is the first term, which is precisely the free vacuum energy <img src="7-7501243\e25affdd-3811-40ce-a930-47d5b782a4c6.jpg" /> and is supposed to be subtracted from <img src="7-7501243\354fe6cb-ab32-4989-a799-5d2e4bf512a8.jpg" /> in order to obtain the Casimir energy. Second, fourth, and fifth term related to extra dimension corrections.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137346"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\b534740d-b9c3-45d8-8ded-f81b0945d66d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As a check on our procedure we have computed the Casimir energy for a fermionic field between two parallel plates in<img src="7-7501243\ea8f0c7d-dfe5-494c-89bb-2a8b3ff6f544.jpg" />, separated by a distance a, and extradimensional size R, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137347"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\a3f90e65-7f49-4281-8dee-45d6bf7afb85.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> depicts the dependence of the Fermionic<sub> </sub>Casimir energy in a Three-dimensional box on a radius of extra dimension and the size of the box. It is showed that corrections’ factors increase proportional to the size of extra dimensions. For extra dimension correction, we deduce from Equation (20) that</p><p><img src="7-7501243\3743ce42-5d88-4977-9c33-8a3bbe88b163.jpg" /></p><p>If there are no extra dimension, then the term αm<sup>2</sup> vanishes. Then casimir energy will become as be shown by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31594-ref4">4</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we have investigated the extra dimensional corrections for Casimir energy in a three-dimensional box in <img src="7-7501243\fb7e76fe-3b05-4679-a5cc-83307c0ca52a.jpg" /> due to the vacuum fluctuations of massless fermionic field with MIT bag boundary conditions. The Casimir energy is computed using generalized AbelPlana summation formula. The most important result we obtain in this letter is that Fermionic Casimir energy depends on the size of extra dimensions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Appendix: Abel-Plana Formula in Calculating the Casimir Energy</title><p>In this appendix we present the details of the calculations leading to our main expression for the casimir energy of a massless fermionic field confined inside cube with one extra dimension via MIT bag model boundary condition. In order to apply the Abel-Plana formula to four sum in Equation (16), we first define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137348"><label>(A1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\900eb81e-9d40-4d0e-a003-ef5e20ec814b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><p><img src="7-7501243\d01ec8b5-202e-4791-9bbf-8a883ac43a6c.jpg" /></p><p>The factor 2 is associated with the spin multiplicity. The branch-cut term can be calculated using the following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137349"><label>(A2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\617c0f4e-11a2-454f-ba5f-a577d2bd3104.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using Equations (17) and (A2), Equation (16) turns into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137350"><label>(A3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\c96ffe1e-137e-4423-89a9-cf4c4ec68211.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The first term is infinite and we have to use the Abel-Plana formula again for the first term. We obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137351"><label>(A4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\c5163e13-1290-4272-9c8a-3c119f6120df.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Again the first term is infinite and we must apply the Abel-Plana formula to obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137352"><label>(A5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\1643db8f-2bfb-4154-a0df-70962fc93d73.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that all of branch cut terms is finite. On other hand the free vacuum energy is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137353"><label>(A6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\3acfcb6d-f360-43d2-b5e1-6a615c93d1fa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Making appropriate changes of variables, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137354"><label>(A7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\09d4886d-7793-4a36-a1ab-7c7fa3d66c31.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore when we compute the Casimir energy these two terms precisely cancel each other. That is,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137355"><label>(A8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\d689c8cf-c268-4113-87d4-b93707c36c2e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here we explain the details of the calculation of the last term and then outline the calculation for remaining terms. We expand the denominator as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137356"><label>(A9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\64733738-67e4-442f-ba41-ff72c9f8abf2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The last term turn into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137357"><label>(A10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\1af39ebc-3df3-46a7-ab05-bcfcf0dca9bf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>by using the identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137358"><label>(A11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\00ee2881-6265-4932-9083-21c4324ae731.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137359"><label>(A12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\6d6adbef-69d6-4cf9-a952-9d79333c40e2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In order to compute the second term of Equation (A8) we first interchange the order of integrations to obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137360"><label>(A13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\02f6b298-9a01-4c32-8289-12cd587b5726.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="7-7501243\251cad81-d5c1-498d-83d1-417442368937.jpg" />. Now using Equations (A9) and (A11) we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137361"><label>(A14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\a2773991-32cc-47b9-a8d0-48d0d15ce004.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Going through this same procedure, we can compute the first branch-cut term in Equation (A8) as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137362"><label>(A15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\ed76c633-76c6-4ef3-9b64-d79cc21d403c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, we arrive at</p><disp-formula id="scirp.31594-formula137363"><label>(A16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7501243\72b8eaaf-32c4-4d34-9593-c2135bee7b5e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.31594-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. B. G. Casimir, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Vol. 51, 1948, p. 793</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31594-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. A. Milton, “The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy,” World Scientific, River Edge, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31594-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. P. Theo, “Casimir Effect in Spacetime with Extra Dimensions-From Kaluza-Klein to Randall Sundrum Models.” ArXiv:hep-th/0907.2989v3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31594-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Seyedzahedi, R. Saghian and S. S. Gousheh, Physical Review A, Vol. 82, 2010, Article ID: 032517.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.032517</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31594-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. S. Khoo and L. P. Theo, Physics Letters B, Vol. 703, 2011, pp. 199-207.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31594-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Alejandro Sanchez, M. Anabitarte and M. Bellini, “Dirac Equation in a de Sitter Expansion for Massive Neutrinos from Modern Kaluza-Klein Theory,” 2012.  
ArXiv:hep-th/1112.5183v4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31594-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Poppenhaeger, S. Hossenfelder, S. Hosmann and M. Bleicher, “The Casimir Effect in the Presence of Compactified Universal Extra Dimensions,” 2003.  
ArXiv:hep-th/0309066v2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>