<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Clinical Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-284X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijcm.2013.45041</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJCM-31390</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Review</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Topical Curaderm&lt;sup&gt;BEC5&lt;/sup&gt; Therapy for Periocular Nonmela-noma Skin Cancers: A Review of Clinical Outcomes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ill</surname><given-names>E. Cham</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Australasian Medical Research, Port Vila, Republic of Vanuatu</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bill.cham@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>05</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>233</fpage><lpage>238</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>February</day>	<month>14th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>March</day>	<month>25th,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>April</day>	<month>28th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Approximately 5 to 10 percent of all skin cancers occur in the periocular region. Basal cell carcinoma is the most fre
   quent malignant periocular tumor, followed by squamous cell carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. Nonmelanoma skin tumors at the periocular area often cause disfigurement with destruction of soft conjunc
   tival tissue.
    
   Many therapeutic methods have been recommended to combat the morbidity and mortality associated with these lesions. Excisions with frozen-section control or Mohs micrographic surgery are regarded as the gold-standard treatments for periocular basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. However, these treatment modalities have various limitations and reconstruction surgery is often associated with these treatment options.
    
   The chemotherapeutic agents solasodine rhamnosides in a cream formulation Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> are specific, effective and safe treatments for nonmela
   noma skin cancers with excellent cosmesis. The antineoplastic mode of action is by apoptosis. In this review it is shown that Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> also treats periocular basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma with impressive cosmetic outcomes and no reconstructive surgery is required. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Periocular Skin Cancers; Curaderm&lt;sup&gt;BEC5&lt;/sup&gt;; Apoptosis; Solamargine; Basal Cell Carcinoma; Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Cosmesis; Solanum</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The two most common forms of periocular skin cancers are basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). BCC is a slow-growing, locally invasive epidermal skin tumor that originates in the basal layer of the skin and can cause considerable patient morbidity [1, 2]. BCC is the most common cancer in the white population, and its incidence is increasing at alarming rates. An estimated 2.8 million people in the United States are diagnosed with BCC annually [3,4].</p><p>SCC is a malignant tumor that arises from the keratinizing cells of the epidermis or its appendages. It is locally invasive and has the potential to metastasize to other organs of the body.</p><p>SCC is the second most common form of skin cancer. An estimated 700,000 cases of SCC are diagnosed each year in the United States [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>BCC and SCC are collectively referred to as nonmelanoma skin cancers. Over the past three decades, more people have had skin cancer than all other cancers combined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref6">6</xref>]. An estimated 3010 deaths from nonmelanoma skin cancers have been predicted to occur in the United States in 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>The periocular region is a common site for head and neck skin malignancy. It is bounded by the nose medially, the orbital rim laterally, the brow superiorly and the infraorbital rim inferiorly.</p><p>BCC accounts for 80% - 95% and SCC for 5% - 10% of periocular malignancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery are the gold-standard for periocular skin malignancies. Once the tumor has been completely removed, reconstructive surgery is usually necessary.</p><p>Reconstruction of periocular defects following excision of cutaneous malignancy can present difficulties for oculofacial and reconstruction surgeons. The intricate anatomy of this area requires precise restoration to avoid postoperative functional and aesthetic concerns. Excision surgery may be very challenging in this anatomical area and can cause cosmetic functional impairment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref8">8</xref>]. In addition, not all patients with periocular malignancies are qualified for surgery.</p><p>Topical therapy with a cream formulation containing solasodine rhamnosides, Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup>, produces beneficial end results with a wide range of BCCs and SCCs of varying locations and sizes ranging from millimeters to centimeters [9,10]. Moreover, cosmesis with little or no scar formation with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> treatment are striking [9-17]. The tissue-sparing technique of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> also preserves functionality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>This communication presents a review of patients with periocular BCCs and SCCs who were treated topically with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup>. This anatomical site is considered to be difficult to treat by any modality.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Treatments Administered</title><p>Selection of study population: Only patients with periocular nonmelanoma skin cancers were selected for this review. Seven patients with BCCs and two patients with SCCs at the periocular region bounded by the nose medially, the orbital rim laterally, the brow superiorly and infraorbital inferiorly were treated topically with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. BEC-Solasodine Rhamnosides</title><p>Glycoalkaloids (BEC) were extracted from the fruit of S. sodomaeum also known as S. linnaeanum (devil’s apple) and S. melongena (eggplant) essentially as described earlier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref19">19</xref>]. BEC is a mixture of solasodine glycosides consisting of the triglycosides solasonine (β-solatriose) (33%), solamargine (β-chacotriose) (33%), and di-and-monoglycosides (34%). All the glycosides contain the same aglycone solasodine [19-24].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> Topical Cream Formulation</title><p>The cream formulation Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> is available to patients in several countries. Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> contains the glycoalkaloids BEC at 0.005% as a topical formulation [9,10].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> Treatment Procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref25">25</xref>]</title><p>The patients were instructed to use Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> as follows:</p><p>• Wash the lesion and the surrounding area with a mild non-irritating soap;</p><p>• Rinse with water;</p><p>• Dry thoroughly;</p><p>• Unscrew the lid of the Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> tube and remove the protective foil that covers the hole in the lid of the tube;</p><p>• Apply Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> to the lesion, just enough to cover the lesion. Spread evenly over lesion only. Do not apply the cream in large quantity and do not extend the cream more than 0.5 cm on the apparently normal skin surrounding the edge of the lesion;</p><p>• Apply the cream to the lesion by gently squeezing the tube;</p><p>• Cover each lesion with an occlusive dressing (for example paper tape) until the next application of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup>;</p><p>• Apply the cream to the lesion twice daily, i.e. every 12 hours;</p><p>• Stop treatment only when the lesion has been completely cleared and replaced with normal skin.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Results</title><p>Histological analyses of biopsies confirmed the clinical evaluations. In some cases biopsies were taken after completion of treatment. Some patients refused to have biopsies taken after treatment for cosmetic reasons. Nevertheless, all patients, except one, which is currently being monitored, were followed-up for over 5 years. All showed no recurrence of their treated lesions.</p><p>Figures 1 and 2 show clinical and histological evaluations of patients who were treated with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> for periocular SCCs.</p><p>Figures 3 to 9 illustrate periocular BCCs that were treated with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup>.</p><p>The general observed pattern of response with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy entailed swelling, erythema, erosion,</p><p>ulceration and regrowth of normal tissue. Tingling, or some pain was experienced for 15 to 30 minutes after each application. In the initial stages of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy, the treated lesion increased in size. From a clini-</p><p>cal perspective, the increase in size seemed to correlate with the extent of tumor presence at the lesion site. During this stage some patients experienced pain or a burning sensation for 15 to 30 minutes after application of the cream. After sometime during treatment, the lesion started to reduce in size. Treatment was continued until the lesion was completely cleared and was replaced with normal skin. At the end of treatment some erythema was observed which lasted several days.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Discussion</title><p>Skin cancer falls into two major groups, nonmelanoma and melanoma. BCC and SCC are types of nonmelanoma skin cancers and are the most common skin cancers. BCC rarely metastasizes or kills. However, it can cause significant destruction, disfigurement and loss of functionality of the affected area. SCCs are locally invasive and can metastasize with potential fatal sequelae.</p><p>In the United States approximately 3 out of 10 and in Australia 1 out of 2 Caucasians may develop BCC within their lifetime. In 80% of all cases, BCCs are found on the head and neck [6,7].</p><p>The treatment for these nonmelanoma skin cancers depends on their type, size and location, the number to be treated, and the preference or expertise of the doctor.</p><p>It has been documented that the most effective treatment option is by surgical excision. However, it has been reported that the recurrence rates using this procedure can be very high, ranging from 30 to 67 percent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>Over the last few decades non-surgical treatments have become available. These include cryotherapy, topical fluorouracil and imiquimod creams, radiotherapy and photodynamic therapy. These procedures have many beneficial outcomes when treating early-detected nonmelanoma skin cancers. However, there are also many limitations and some disadvantages using these techniques are: requirement of local anesthetics, procedural complications, discomfort and/or pain, multiple visits to the doctor, possible infection, risk of scarring, disfigurement, long treatment periods, changes in pigmentation, high recurrence rates and possible requirement of reconstruction after treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>Surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery are the most effective treatments for periocular skin cancers. Reconstruction of the resulting defect is tailored to preserve function, protect the eye, and provide a satisfactory cosmetic appearance. Mohs micrographic surgery procedure may become tedious, prolonged and exhausting for the patient; especially if the case is difficult or complex as is the case with periocular tumors. This procedure requires a specially trained dermatologist and ancillary staff. Multiple injections of local anesthetic can cause discomfort for the patient. Mohs treatment fails in tumors that have satellitosis, a multicentric origin, or skip areas. Surgical procedures are also costly.&#160;</p><p>Unfortunately, not all patients with periocular malignancies qualify for surgical intervention and many patients find it daunting to have surgical procedures around the eyes. Consequently the lesion grows larger with potentially drastic sequelae.</p><p>This current communication shows clearly that topical treatments of periocular BCCs and SCCs with Curaderm <sup>BEC5</sup> result in impressive clinical outcomes.</p><p>The antineoplastic mode of action of the solasodine rhamnosides, solamargine and solasonine, present in Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> may explain the remarkable observed clinical outcomes. Specific endogenous endocytic lectins (EELs) have been identified on cancer cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref27">27</xref>]. These EELs have been further characterized as rhamnose binding protein (RBP) receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref28">28</xref>]. RBP receptors are present on cancer cells but not normal cells [27,28]. RBP receptors bind the solasodine rhamnosides (BEC). BEC is then internalized into the cancer cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis through “coated pit endocytosis”. BEC interacts with the lysosomes and mitochondria resulting in the triggering of extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways in the cancer cells by up-regulating the expression of external death receptors, such as tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR-1), Fas receptor, TNFR-1 associated death domain and Fas-associated death domain [29,30]. BEC enhances the intrinsic ratio of Bax to Bcl-2 by upregulating Bax and down-regulating Bcl-2 and Bcl-x expressions. These effects result in activation of Caspase-8, -9 and -3 in cancer cells [24-34], indicating that BEC triggers extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways in cancer cells and causes apoptosis to cancer cells.</p><p>These events may explain the clinical observations that treatment with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> results in elimination of cancer cells only and not normal cells. Very importantly, whilst cancer cells are being destroyed by Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup>, normal cells are replenishing the dead cancer cells and this exceptional occurrence translates to the observed cosmesis effects of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy. Moreover, Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy clears cancer cells whether they are proliferating or not [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>Clinical observations with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy reveal that initially the lesion size increases significantly due to interaction of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> with deeper seated and more lateral tumor cells [15-17,25]. As treatment progresses, the size of the lesion decreases due to the elimination of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> affected cancer cells, which are replaced with normal skin cells. Less Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> cream is then applied to the smaller sized lesion until the lesion is completely cleared and replaced with normal skin cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>The pain during treatment experienced by some patients may be explained by the keratolytic agents salicylic acid and urea and not BEC as was previously reported in placebo controlled clinical trials with Curaderm <sup>BEC5</sup> [11,35,36].</p><p>Curaderm<sup>BEC</sup> therapy is stopped only after the lesion has been completely replaced with normal tissue. This explains why treatment periods of Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy vary and are dependent on size, location and type of tumor tissue.</p><p>These striking observations with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy are vastly different than all other therapies that are used for treatment of neoplastic cells. After Curaderm <sup>BEC5</sup> therapy, no reconstructive surgery is required. The body heals itself with no disfigurement, and, functionality of the tissue is preserved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.31390-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Conclusion</title><p>Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy for periocular nonmelanoma skin cancers is very effective and safe. The treatment of these lesions overcomes the major drawbacks of other currently available therapies. Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> is specific and eliminates the cancer cells only, without harming normal cells and consequently cosmesis is excellent. No reconstructive surgery is required with Curaderm<sup>BEC5</sup> therapy. These preliminary observations warrant more extensive clinical evaluations to determine the potential of this treatment modality for periocular skin cancers.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.31390-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. J. Miller, “Biology of Basal Cell Carcinoma (Part 1),” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1991, pp. 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. N. Crowson, “Basal Cell Carcinoma: Biology, Morphology and Clinical Implications,” Modern Pathology, Vol. 19, No. S2, 2006, pp. 5127-5147.  
doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800512</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. L. Miller and M. A. Weinstock, “Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in the United States: Incidence,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1994, pp. 774-778.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. H. Brewster, L. A. Bhatti, J. H. C. Inglis, E. R. Nairn and V. R. Doherty, “Recent Trends in Incidence of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers in the East of Scotland, 19922003,” British Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 156, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1295-1300.  
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07892.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American Academy of Dermatology, “Squamous Cell Carcinoma,” 2012.  
http://www.aad.org/skin-conditions/dermatology-a-to-z/squamous-cell-carcinoma</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Stern, “Prevalence of a History of Skin Cancer in 2007: Results of an Incidence-Based Model,” Archives Dermatology, Vol. 146, No. 3, 2010, pp. 279-282.  
doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American Cancer Society, “Cancer Facts &amp; Figures,” 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. I. Ceilley and J. Q. del Rosso, “Current Modalities and New Advances in the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma,” International Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2006, pp. 489-498.  
doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02673.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Intralesion and Curaderm BEC5 Topical Combination Therapies of Solasodine Rhamnosyl Glycosides Derived from the Eggplant or Devil’s Apple Result in Rapid Removal of Large Skin Cancers. Methods of Treatment Compared,” International Journal Clinical Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2012, pp. 115-124.  
doi:10.4236/ijcm.2012.32024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Topical Solasodine Rhamnosyl Glycosides Derived from the Eggplant Treats Large Skin Cancers: Two Case Reports,” International Journal Clinical Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2011, pp. 473-477.  
doi:10.4236/ijcm.2011.24080</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Punjabi, L. J. Cook, P. Kersey, R. Marks and R. Cerio, “Solasodine Glycoalkaloids: A Novel Topical Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study,” International Journal Dermatology, Vol. 47, 2008, pp. 78-82. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03363.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham and H. M. Meares, “Glycoalkaloids from Solanum sodomaeum L. Are Effective in the Treatment of Skin Cancers in Man,” Cancer Letters, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1987, pp. 111-118. doi:10.1016/0304-3835(87)90081-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, B. Daunter and R. Evans, “Topical Treatment of Malignant and Premalignant Skin Cancers by Very Low Concentrations of a Standard Mixture of Solasodine Glycosides,” Cancer Letters, Vol. 59, No. 3, 1991, pp. 183-192. doi:10.1016/0304-3835(91)90140-D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Solasodine Glycosides as Anti-Cancer Agents: Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies,” Asia Pacific Journal Pharmacology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1994, pp. 113-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Solasodine Rhamnosyl Glycosides in a Cream Formulation Is Effective for Treating Large and Troublesome Skin Cancers,” Research Journal Biological Science, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2007, pp. 749-761.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Solasodine Rhamnosyl Glycosides Specifically Bind Cancer Cell Receptors and Induce Apoptosis and Necrosis. Treatment for Skin Cancer and Hope for Internal Cancers,” Research Journal Biological Science, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2007, pp. 503-514.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. R. Chase, “CuradermBEC5 for Skin Cancers, Is It? An Overview,” Journal Cancer Therapy, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2011, pp. 728-745. doi:10.4236/jct.2011.25099</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. H. Goldberg, J. M. Landau, M. N. Moody and I. J. Vergilis-Kalner, “Treatment of Bowen’s Disease on the Penis with Low Concentration of a Standard Mixture of Solasodine Glycosides and Liquid Nitrogen,” Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 37, 2011, pp. 858-861.  
doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02014.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham and L. Wilson, “HPLC of Glycoalkaloids from Solanum sodomaeum,” Planta Medica, Vol. 53, No. 1, 1987, pp. 34-36. doi:10.1055/s-2006-962612</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, M. Gilliver and L. Wilson, “Antitumour Effects of Glycoalkaloids Isolated from Solanum sodomaeum L.,” Planta Medica, Vol. 53, No. 1, 1987, pp. 34-36. doi:10.1055/s-2006-962612</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham and B. Daunter, “Solasodine Glycosides. Selective Cytotoxicity for Cancer Cells and Inhibition of Cytotoxicity by Rhamnose in Mice with Sarcoma 180,” Cancer Letters, Vol. 55, 1990, pp. 221-225.  
doi:10.1016/0304-3835(90)90122-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham and T. R. Chase, “Solasodine Rhamnosyl Glycosides Cause Apoptosis in Cancer Cells, Do They Also Prime the Immune System Resulting in Long Term Protection against Cancer?” Planta Medica, Vol. 78, 2012, pp. 349-353. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1298149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Monograph on the Compound BEC,” Drugs of the Future, Vol. 13, 1988, pp. 714-716.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “The Eggplant Cancer Cure. A Treatment for Skin Cancer and New Hope for Other Cancers from Nature’s Pharmacy,” Smart Publications, Petaluma, 2007, pp. 1-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Inspired by Nature, Proven by Science. The New Generation Cancer Treatment That Causes Cancer Cells to Commit Suicide,” in Preparation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. A. E. Sussman and D. F. Liggins, “Incompletely Excised Basal Cell Carcinoma a Management Dilemma?” Aust NZ Journal Surgery, Vol. 66, 1996, pp. 276-278.  
doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb01184.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Daunter and B. E. Cham, “Solasodine Glycosides, in Vitro Preferential Cytotoxicity for Human Cancer Cells,” Cancer Letters, Vol. 55, No. 3, 1990, pp. 209-220.  
doi:10.1016/0304-3835(90)90121-D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. J. Lipscombe, S. J. Carter and M. Ruane, “Rhamnose Binding Protein,” United States Patent 6, 930, 171 B2, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Y. Shiu, L. C. Chang, C. H. Liang, Y. S. Huang, H. M. Sheu and K. W. Kuo, “Solamargine Induces Apoptosis and Sensitizes Breast Cancer Cells to Cisplatin,” Food Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 45, No. 11, 2007, pp. 2155-2164. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. H. Liang, L. Y. Shiu, L. C. Chang, H. M. Sheu and K. W. Kuo, “Solamargine Upregulation of Fas, Downregulation of HER 2, and Enhancement of Cytotoxicity Using Epirubicin in NSCLC Cells,” Molecular Nutrition Food Research, Vol. 51, 2007, pp. 999-1005.  
doi:10.1002/mnfr.200700044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Y. Shiu, C. H. Liang, L. C. Chang, H. M. Sheu, E. M. Tsai and K. W. Kuo, “Solamargine Induces Apoptosis and Enhances Susceptibility to Trastazumab and Epirubicin in Breast Cancer Cells with Low or High Expression Levels of HER2/neu,”Bioscience Reports, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2009, pp. 35-45. doi:10.1042/BSR20080028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Sun, Y. Zhao, X. Li, H. Yuan, A. Cheng and H. Lou, “A Lysosomal-Mitochondrial Death Pathway Is Induced by Solamargine in Human K562 Leukemia Cells,” Toxicology in Vitro, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1504-1511.  
doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Sun, Y. Zhao, H. Yuan, X. Li, A. Cheng and H. Lou, “Solamargine, a Steroidal Alkaloid Glycoside, Induces Oncosis in Human K562 Leukemia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma KB Cells,” Cancer Chemotherapy Pharmacology, Vol. 65, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1125-1130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Li, Y. Zhao, W. K. K. Wu, S. Liu, M. Cui and H. Lou, “Solamargine Induces Apoptosis Associated with p53 Transcription-Dependent and Transcription-Independent Pathways in Human Osteosarcoma U20S Cells,” Life Science, Vol. 88, No. 7-8, 2011, pp. 314-321.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Solasodine Glycosides: A Topical Therapy for Actinic Keratosis. A Single-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study,” Journal Cancer Therapy, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2013, pp. 588-596.  
doi:10.4236/jct.2013.42076</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.31390-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. E. Cham, “Drug Therapy: Solamargine and Other Solasodine Rhamnosyl Glycosides as Anticancer Agents,” Modern Chemotherapy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2013, pp. 33-49.  
doi:10.4236/mc.2013.22005</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>