<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2013.44092</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-30444</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Adaptive Least-Squares Mixed Finite Element Method for Fourth Order Parabolic Problems
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ing</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Haiming</surname><given-names>Gu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ghm@qust.edu.cn(HG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>04</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>675</fpage><lpage>679</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>29,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>February</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   A least-squares mixed finite element (LSMFE) method for the numerical solution of fourth order parabolic problems analyzed and developed in this paper. The Ciarlet-Raviart mixed finite element space is used to approximate. The a posteriori error estimator which is needed in the adaptive refinement algorithm is proposed. The local evaluation of the least-squares functional serves as a posteriori error estimator. The posteriori errors are effectively estimated. The convergence of the adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method is proved. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Adaptive Method; Least-Squares Mixed Finite Element Method; Fourth Order Parabolic Problems; Least-Squares Functional; &lt;i&gt;A&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;Posteriori&lt;/i&gt; Error</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A general theory of the least-squares method has been developed by A. K. Aziz, R. B. Kellogg and A. B. Stephens in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref1">1</xref>]. The most important advantage leads to a symmetric positive definite problem. In the least-squares mixed finite element approach, a least-squares residual minimization is introduced. This method has an advantage which is not subject to the LBB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref1">1</xref>] condition. The mixed finite element methods of least-squares type have been the object of many studies recently (see, e.g. Stokes Equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref2">2</xref>], Elliptic Problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref3">3</xref>], Newtonian Fluid Flow Problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref4">4</xref>], Transmission Problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref5">5</xref>], Sobolev Equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref6">6</xref>], Parabolic Problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref7">7</xref>] et al.). The adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method have been studied in recent several years (see, e.g. the linear elasticity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref8">8</xref>]), but the research of adaptive method about fourth order parabolic problems is not common.</p><p>Adaptive methods are now widely used in the scientific computation. In this paper, we are interested in the adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method for fourth order parabolic problems, fourth order parabolic problems are fundamental partial differential equations. It occurs in various areas of applied mathematics and science. Our emphasis in this paper is on the performance of an adaptive refinement strategy based on the a posteriori error estimator inherent in the least-squares formulation by the local evaluation of the functional. During the last 15 - 20 years a big amount of work has been devoted to a posteriori error estimation problem, i.e., computing reliable bounds on the error of given numerical approximation to the solution of partial differential equations using only numerical solution and the given data. In order to operate the a posteriori error estimator should be neither under nor overestimate the error. The a posteriori error is effectively estimated, and proved the convergence of the adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method in this paper.</p><p>An outline of the paper is as follows. The least-squares formulation of fourth order parabolic problems is described in Section 2. It includes continuous and coercivity properties of the least-squares variational formulation. Appropriate spaces for the finite element approximation and a generalization of the coercivity shown in Section 2 to the discrete form is discussed in Section 3. In Section 4, a posteriori error estimators which are needed in an adaptive refinement algorithm are composed with the least-squares functional, and posteriori errors are effectively estimated. The convergence of the adaptive leastsquares mixed finite element method is shown in Section 5. Finally, we summarize our findings and present conclusions in Section 6. In this paper, we define C to be a generic positive constant.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. A Least-Squares Formulation of Fourth Order Parabolic Problems</title><p>We start from the equations of fourth order parabolic problems in the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24311"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\a55dee32-1713-4600-beeb-a489e1a0cfb4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24312"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\81c3f5f1-36a1-4563-9a42-89beb189b461.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24313"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\d1022c7b-943c-40c3-a813-0139d1d73170.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24314"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\4f75f984-b58d-4cf4-83fd-1501f0a71639.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="11-7401374\46e3312c-7f35-4cb8-9f85-acdac0d94b30.jpg" /> is a bounded domain, with boundary<img src="11-7401374\1cdd4544-6c3e-4ba9-aaac-300aec93adc2.jpg" />. We shall consider an adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method for (1)-(4).</p><p>Now we set<img src="11-7401374\14272c16-cbb5-4ee4-83bb-29950212bbdc.jpg" />, then, we have:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24315"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\9b7ad2ca-7554-40f4-bc0c-c3e225f44867.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24316"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\3b67fd32-ad63-413d-a03c-631c7f4a1572.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24317"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\801260f7-83ee-4837-a3ff-9bcca0933159.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24318"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\183807a3-7494-410a-866c-fc9968a1cc3a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24319"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\ddd035ca-b994-40cb-a8a5-e3b4c279d3b0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We introduce the Sobolev spaces:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\05dac3f4-b7c0-44f7-b185-538cc7fbe3f6.jpg" /> <img src="11-7401374\80615ac5-7aaa-427f-bf5b-27e77a336e35.jpg" /></p><p><img src="11-7401374\62dd4ab0-84bd-4314-a665-64305a504ca9.jpg" /></p><p>Now, let us define the least-squares problem: find <img src="11-7401374\ef29d41b-2bb4-4a04-afb2-6b2dc3fe699a.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref9">9</xref>] such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24320"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\b2e52f2d-7a5e-47e7-ba9c-e33ec0ad7026.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24321"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\4b10f888-c6ad-460f-93ef-f8e9c2662550.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We introduce the least-squares functional:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\7bfec642-1e9d-4246-8e43-cd20aa60e2a0.jpg" /></p><p>Taking variations in (10) with respect to q and v, the weak statement becomes: find <img src="11-7401374\bb86d56c-5ad1-4bdc-8198-140c55b5fffc.jpg" /> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24322"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\308b1ac1-8baa-4d40-9bfe-7b7b723a2d06.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24323"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\59fbcde2-418d-4f63-bb6c-02bda5409293.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 2.1. The bilinear form <img src="11-7401374\343076c8-59d2-474c-ad78-605bc2827001.jpg" /> is continuous and coercive. In other words, there exist positive constants <img src="11-7401374\c55249ef-fdfb-421d-b41e-39b97b8cb279.jpg" /> and<img src="11-7401374\29269cb4-67d9-497b-84ce-5ab4655d87c1.jpg" />, such that</p><p><img src="11-7401374\53e2d68c-b3b0-4bd7-acdb-f6c2b48dacea.jpg" /></p><p><img src="11-7401374\0046c707-19e8-4745-9f5d-5ba4a9d63125.jpg" /></p><p>holds for all<img src="11-7401374\4171b7bb-bdaa-4f42-b0cb-3282d6a763a2.jpg" />.</p><p>Proof: 1) For the upper bound we have:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\d9ae5032-6660-4c82-8f19-96945e126836.jpg" /></p><p>Since the bilinear form is symmetric, this is sufficient for the upper bound in Theorem 2.1.</p><p>2) For the lower bound.</p><p><img src="11-7401374\a28d0fcd-5a28-4c5e-b294-0b1cc4706aa5.jpg" /></p><p>so we can select the positive constants <img src="11-7401374\ad9dab2d-676a-49f2-8456-8e954bf93c57.jpg" /> satisfying</p><p><img src="11-7401374\b5b97ddf-3fe2-4591-9d2a-8524154e547b.jpg" /></p><p>we have</p><p><img src="11-7401374\cb7de36d-7b18-4f0d-92d2-d6478572b70f.jpg" /></p><p>The proof of Theorem 2.1 is therefore completed.</p><p>Theorem 2.2. The Equations (5)-(9) has a unique solution, and the solution is<img src="11-7401374\4f339662-1011-4598-be5e-f2604be7ed89.jpg" />.</p><p>Proof: From Theorem 2.1, we know that the bilinear form <img src="11-7401374\5d771565-8b56-40a2-a581-efc1d0f7c1cf.jpg" /> is coercive and bounded on <img src="11-7401374\3569688f-298a-49b4-8e37-b1548519ea2b.jpg" /> <img src="11-7401374\8a93b2f1-922e-47eb-b29c-a8f1a6b7aecb.jpg" />. Then the result follows from Lax-Milgram theorem.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Finite Element Approximation</title><p>In principle, the LSMFE approach simply consists of minimizing (12) in finite-dimensional subspaces <img src="11-7401374\8875f26c-e725-46d0-8f73-71a1dc85b6cf.jpg" /> and<img src="11-7401374\18e21fa8-f6a0-443d-9711-00c5f3935b74.jpg" />. Suitable spaces are based on a triangulation <img src="11-7401374\680a857d-277b-4339-b320-0edff2943437.jpg" /> of <img src="11-7401374\cbedb7fa-5232-4cf4-9cfe-3e298faf1749.jpg" /> and consist of piecewise polynomials with sufficient continuity conditions.</p><p>Now we consider the Ciarlet-Raviart mixed finite element form. Let <img src="11-7401374\6083be27-e935-4146-8980-697ce94e4479.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="11-7401374\431fb9d9-f86a-4709-b622-9bc2bf55ffeb.jpg" />, let <img src="11-7401374\e650f21e-66b6-49c3-822e-62ec2d6b4a1c.jpg" /> be a class qusi-uniform regular partition of<img src="11-7401374\f1591121-cf41-4775-ba8d-756c56ace4eb.jpg" />.</p><p>The least-squares functional:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24324"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\ef57ce58-3373-4cee-bc2c-d5894942c2f1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Minimizing the functional (14) is equivalent to the following variational problem: find <img src="11-7401374\d9a3776b-495e-4aa5-8295-0f64c998be56.jpg" /> and <img src="11-7401374\942631d7-f2fa-44c9-9dd0-f69f73d3b51f.jpg" /> such that</p><p><img src="11-7401374\def2661e-6d67-4b5e-9d36-5365a204cb23.jpg" />holds for all<img src="11-7401374\47bcd8ec-64fd-4083-ab29-3e23901d0f68.jpg" />.</p><p>The discrete bilinear form <img src="11-7401374\fb8a2e00-c820-473f-96a4-af470523ad3d.jpg" /> is defined as follows:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\c8536aac-077a-434c-889f-51b9f69531ee.jpg" /></p><p>which holds for all <img src="11-7401374\69c86c39-c501-454a-8384-e8ff90629580.jpg" /> <img src="11-7401374\7d166fad-dae1-4f16-9369-4ba4c67b7daf.jpg" />.</p><p>Theorem 3.1. The bilinear <img src="11-7401374\a5f2894c-9443-49af-83b2-4414e7aa0cad.jpg" /> is continuous and coercive, i.e., there exist positive constants <img src="11-7401374\9fe71c06-1d53-4451-9871-045e54e6e8da.jpg" /> and <img src="11-7401374\99d58d6a-0cca-4481-b3ff-12a7e49b16c9.jpg" /> such that</p><p><img src="11-7401374\bfb871cd-cd47-4f27-9f5e-cc3e5c8ed32f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="11-7401374\4456aa18-2ab1-4de7-b8d9-2d7df6f55bc1.jpg" /></p><p>which holds for all <img src="11-7401374\3ff89803-1760-4202-9e8d-c52c56ddda2a.jpg" /> <img src="11-7401374\1e1e3c6c-d22e-427f-b01f-6813ac54dff3.jpg" />. The proof is the same as the Theorem 2.1, we omit the proof.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Postieriori Error Estimation</title><p>One of the main motivations for using least-squares finite element approaches is the fact that the element-wise evaluation of the functional serves as an a posteriori error estimator.</p><p>A posteriori estimate attempt to provide quantitatively accurate measures of the discretization error through the socalled a posteriori error estimators which are derived by using the information obtained during the solution process. In recent years, the use of a posteriori error estimators has become an efficient tool for assessing and controlling computational errors in adaptive computations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Now we define the least-squares functional:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24325"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\99adabf2-9fac-40f2-bb22-d737c7fe709b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We have</p><p><img src="11-7401374\14f35fa2-f28d-45d6-877f-df97b49a6f72.jpg" /></p><p>so we define the posteriori estimator as following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24326"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\93833104-c75f-4103-b505-dfe8bdb7825d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 4.1. The least-squares functional constitutes an a posteriori error estimator. In other words, for</p><p><img src="11-7401374\6fc0bec9-2f7b-4304-8378-5adf06a38363.jpg" /></p><p>there exist positive constants <img src="11-7401374\701e0d91-355d-48c2-92a2-aed2b83477f1.jpg" /> and <img src="11-7401374\c35a3258-c9c3-4edd-b449-0992b37069d8.jpg" /> such that</p><p><img src="11-7401374\2a454493-2e62-480d-85ef-62fd9e99ecbb.jpg" /></p><p><img src="11-7401374\b477427e-d015-45ac-8047-6cbf6300275c.jpg" /></p><p>Proof: We know</p><p><img src="11-7401374\7c6f599d-efa9-47b9-9340-f934474f1ac8.jpg" /></p><p>From Theorem 3.1, we have:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\11d53ba3-2de9-46bc-b9dd-ea2b75918986.jpg" /></p><p><img src="11-7401374\b8b42ed7-344e-4c21-99f8-f58274351da2.jpg" /></p><p>The positive constants <img src="11-7401374\7ba5411f-4066-4ec1-83a4-647d3fb90192.jpg" /> and<img src="11-7401374\ee79ea5a-7fe7-4f92-9a5c-9024c9b3346d.jpg" />, this completes the proof.</p><p>Remark: The mesh is adapted and based on a posteriori error estimate of the fourth order elliptic problems. Based on the computed a posteriori error estimator<img src="11-7401374\51f8192b-b2bb-4ee5-84db-366ae83e76ca.jpg" />, we use a mesh optimization procedure to compute the size of elements in the new mesh. Adaptive refinement strategies consist in refining those triangles with the largest values of<img src="11-7401374\0c03d3f2-2079-459d-9da7-da01c72d6ff3.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Least-Squares Mixed Finite Element Method</title><p>We now briefly introduce the main idea of adaptive leastsquares mixed finite element methods through local refinement. Given an initial triangulation<img src="11-7401374\938e5563-eb73-4b3e-9a4a-c28871905670.jpg" />, we shall generate a sequence of nested conforming triangulations <img src="11-7401374\452e7d1d-8674-4235-ae48-ba8d39e7d10e.jpg" /> using the following loop<img src="11-7401374\4a4d515e-bba6-4e15-b29a-5ebc2f2d545f.jpg" />:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\bee0cfdb-a1dd-437f-a8da-05de70cb8395.jpg" /></p><p>More precisely to get <img src="11-7401374\675cbfd3-44d1-411a-8af9-4d0ca85ae62c.jpg" /> from <img src="11-7401374\a8367771-79ce-480e-9365-e3548ff44c6e.jpg" /> we first solve (5)-(9) to get <img src="11-7401374\2b2a00d9-41bb-4293-a586-772a547f8804.jpg" /> on<img src="11-7401374\dc9757a3-1fa3-4e11-b199-c819488fe1db.jpg" />. The error is estimated using <img src="11-7401374\b2cee305-fb57-4fb5-8b95-8b783fe24a8a.jpg" /> and to mark a set of <img src="11-7401374\4c8f151c-311b-4f5a-8fbe-f090c38d97e3.jpg" /> that are to be refined. Triangles are refined in such a way that the triangulation is still shape regular and conforming.</p><p>The a posteriori error estimator is essential part of the ESTIMATE step. The a posteriori error estimator is usually split into local error indicators and they are then employed to make local modifications by dividing the elements whose error indicator is large and possibly coarsening the elements whose error indicator is small.</p><p>The convergence of local refinement algorithms based on the repetition of loop <img src="11-7401374\c3c1c7bf-3327-4cbf-b4f0-01fddb056c8f.jpg" /> is established by the error reduction type result. Let <img src="11-7401374\ac0ff8d8-eb86-45e1-b1bd-44c882367e0b.jpg" /> be a shape regular triangulation of <img src="11-7401374\1bd4a5ca-7236-4d87-9507-0bbd61db798b.jpg" /> and <img src="11-7401374\16375b90-c0ad-4e55-824f-cda23f7ec0be.jpg" /> is a refinement of <img src="11-7401374\5bd2c6c0-5e4e-4e88-9cf7-dbb1f25360b3.jpg" /> such that<img src="11-7401374\f99eb4c8-952c-439c-82f1-dd68698fb92a.jpg" />. Let <img src="11-7401374\848efac3-f1b1-43d1-8362-1146de6116cd.jpg" /> and <img src="11-7401374\574ef269-3bd9-4590-84a4-4effa6d0b927.jpg" /> be the finite element approximation of <img src="11-7401374\368b952c-47a0-45f4-8275-3041053218c3.jpg" /> in <img src="11-7401374\be7daaad-5e9d-4996-9b1f-34bfda804f88.jpg" /> and<img src="11-7401374\276aeb96-eb62-42a7-9300-092fdf32267c.jpg" />, respectively. We shall use the following results in the proof of the convergence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30444-ref11">11</xref>]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30444-formula24327"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="11-7401374\099cec2d-934a-4151-9969-9da9846ac09f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <img src="11-7401374\8468fd74-f6cf-4d6e-8053-820d6c1a3051.jpg" /> be an initial shape regular triangulation, let <img src="11-7401374\f1b2b29e-aa60-43af-ad60-e3bfe2f08796.jpg" /> be a solution of (5)-(9) in the <img src="11-7401374\7a0eb7d7-0ee0-416f-bec6-3c46941ef04e.jpg" /> loop. We have the following theorem:</p><p>Theorem 5.1. Let <img src="11-7401374\4e4fa927-5af7-442a-983d-ebab4afc0ff4.jpg" /> be a solution obtained in the <img src="11-7401374\747b2395-5fa5-4d19-9959-ab45cac2e301.jpg" /> loop in the algorithm, then there exists a constants <img src="11-7401374\59e6ceab-e40f-4148-b6bb-8639a3b72952.jpg" /> depending the shape regularity of <img src="11-7401374\eac44f7f-a4d6-478d-9cbd-2efb80a75dc8.jpg" /> such that:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\2ee16581-89cf-4f44-a69b-718c90a1362d.jpg" /></p><p>and thus the algorithm will terminate in finite steps.</p><p>Proof: In the <img src="11-7401374\09e2a52f-2023-465e-914f-0010dcafcef7.jpg" /> step we select <img src="11-7401374\947f08ed-9bd3-431f-b0c6-b69bfceedbdf.jpg" /> such that</p><p><img src="11-7401374\49ee061a-6059-499e-ba77-d5f001132d20.jpg" /></p><p>From Theorem 4.1, we obtain the following inequality:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\5cb5f450-8e3b-411e-9b03-eb6dcdce54d0.jpg" /></p><p>By (17) we have:</p><p><img src="11-7401374\f05dafb4-4dbd-4666-9662-0e0e472d85e1.jpg" /></p><p>so there exists a constant <img src="11-7401374\661252d9-fb33-4cbe-8204-034197f62bd9.jpg" /> such that</p><p><img src="11-7401374\e27a4d06-2895-4692-96b8-7aa50fb2f932.jpg" /></p><p>we let<img src="11-7401374\bbc96872-6f7d-4de2-a31c-0d5347222967.jpg" />, we then get</p><p><img src="11-7401374\6c78d073-9a94-481a-923c-f7017da4778d.jpg" /></p><p>which by recursion implies</p><p><img src="11-7401374\06c30f75-6077-44cd-ba40-4912af929a6b.jpg" /></p><p>So the adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method is converged.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Summary and Conclusions</title><p>We describe an adaptive least-squares mixed finite element procedure for solving the fourth order parabolic problems in this paper, and the procedure uses a leastsquares mixed finite element formulation and adaptive refinement based on a posteriori error estimate. The methods were applied to study the continuous and coercivity of the fourth order parabolic problems.</p><p>In this paper, we applied relatively standard a posteriori error estimation techniques to adaptively solve the fourth order parabolic problems and shown the convergence of the adaptive least-squares mixed finite element method.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.30444-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Aziz, R. B. Kellogg and A. B. Stephens, “Least Squares Methods for Elliptic Systems,” Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 44, 1985, pp. 53-70.  
doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1985-0771030-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. M. Gu, D. P. Yang, S. L. Sui and X. M. Liu, “Least Squares Mixed Finite Element Method for a Class of Stokes Equation,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2000, pp. 557-566.  
doi:10.1007/BF02459037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H.-M. Gu and X.-L. Xu, “The Least-Squares Mixed Finite Element Methods for a Degenerate Elliptic Problem,” Mathematica Applicata, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2002, pp. 118-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Q. Cai, B. Lee and P. Wang, “Least-Squares Methods for Incompressible Newtonian Fluid Flow: Linear Stationary Problems,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2004, pp. 843-859.  
doi:10.1137/S0036142903422673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Maischak and E. P. Stephan, “A Least Squares Coupling Method with Finite Elements and Boundary Elements for Transmission Problems,” Computers &amp; Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 48, No. 7-8, 2004, pp. 995-1016. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2004.10.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. M. Gu and D. P. Yang, “Least-Squares Mixed Finite Element Method for Sobolev Equations,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2000, pp. 505-517.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M.-Y. Kim E.-J. Park and J. Park, “Mixed Finite Element Domain Decomposition for Nonlinear Parabolic Problems,” Computers &amp; Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 40, No. 8-9, 2000, pp. 1061-1070.  
doi:10.1016/S0898-1221(00)85016-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Q. Cai, J. Korsawe and G. Starke, “An Adaptive Least Squares Mixed Finite Element Method for the Stress Displacement Formulation of Linear Elasticity,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005, pp. 132-148. doi:10.1002/num.20029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. D. Luo, “Theoretical Bases for Mixed Finite Element Methods and Application,” Science Press, Beijing, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.-Y. Yang, “Analysis of a Least Squares Finite Element Method for the Circular Arch Problem,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 114, No. 2-3, 2000, pp. 263-278. doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00122-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Tang and J. C. Xu, “Adaptive Computations: Theory and Algorithms,” Science Press, Beijing, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Agouzal, “A Posteriori Error Estimators for Nonconforming Approximation,” Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2008, pp. 77-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30444-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Li, M. S. Shephard and M. W. Beall, “3D Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation Using Mesh Modifications,” Submitted to Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>