<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Composite Materials</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5612</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojcm.2013.32A001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJCM-30183</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Improvement in Mechanical and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composite Using Two Different Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>B. A. Salam</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>V. Hosur</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Zainuddin</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Jeelani</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Mechanical Engineering, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hosur@mytu.tuskegee.edu(MVH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>04</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>22nd,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>February</day>	<month>22nd,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>20th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this study, two types of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes were dispersed in an epoxy resin system (SC-15) at room and elevated temperatures using a combination of sonication and high shear mixing methods to determine optimal mechanical and thermal properties. At first, 0.1 wt% - 0.3 wt% of amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub>) and carboxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH) were dispersed in part-A of SC-15 resin using a combination method. The mixture was then added to part-B of epoxy resin and cured using two different cycles (cycle A: at room temperature for 24 hours and post-cure at 93.33?C for 4 hours, cycle B: at 65.56?C for 5 hours). In addition, control samples (without MWCNTs) were also fabricated for baseline consideration under similar conditions. In all cases, epoxy with MWCNTs showed improved performance. Improvements in properties in MWCNT/epoxy samples prepared using cycle A were comparatively lower than samples prepared with cycle B. Flexural and thermo-mechanical results demonstrated maximum improvement in 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH modified epoxy samples prepared using cycle B. Improvements in performance for samples cured at elevated temperatures were attributed to better dispersion of MWCNTs due to reduced viscosity. On the other hand, increased number of functional groups present in MWCNT-COOH contributed to higher crosslinking resulting in the highest observed properties. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Carbon Nanotubes; Functionalization; Flexure; Storage Modulus; Glass Transition Temperature</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) are attractive materials for use in high performance fibre reinforced composites used in Aerospace, marine, defence, and off-shore structures among others. In general, fillers are used to enhance the matrix properties and improve the dimensional stability as well as to reduce cost. Among different types of nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes are especially useful for modification of matrix due to their exceptional strength and stiffness, high flexibility, diameter dependent specific surface area and high aspect ratio [1-3]. The mechanical properties of epoxy resins are significantly improved by adding very low contents of carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Nowadays, functionalised CNTs are used to improve the matrix because of better reactivity with resin than unfunctionalised CNTs. Guadagno et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref4">4</xref>], Spitalsky et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref5">5</xref>] and Theodore et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref6">6</xref>] demonstrated that chemical functionalization of MWCNTs increases the compatibility with the epoxy matrix due to the formation of an interface with stronger interactions.</p><p>The main obstacle to improve the properties of nanocomposites is poor dispersion of CNTs leading to agglomeration and voids. Proper dispersion of CNTs in polymer matrix is necessary to improve the properties of polymer matrix. Using different dispersion methods like mechanical stirring, magnetic stirring, sonication and high shear mixing, CNTs can be dispersed in an epoxy system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref7">7</xref>]. Among these methods, sonication is the most commonly used technique to disperse CNTs in epoxy resin. Interfacial adhesion between the CNTs and polymer is also a critical issue. In order to have sufficient stress transfer from the matrix to the CNTs and to efficiently use the potential of CNTs as reinforcements, a strong interfacial adhesion between the CNTs and polymer is desirable. The interfacial adhesion between CNTs and matrix was reported to improve by functionalizing the CNTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref8">8</xref>]. Tailored amino, carboxyl or glycidyl groups enable covalent bonding between CNTs and epoxy resulting in improved interfacial bonding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref9">9</xref>]. Curing temperature is also an important parameter for fabricating carbon fibre reinforced nanotube/epoxy composites. At high temperature curing cycle, functionalized CNTs exhibit increased reactivity with epoxy which could enhance cross-linked density of polymer composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref10">10</xref>]. Additionally, reduced viscosity at elevated temperature facilitates better dispersion of CNTs in polymers. It has been reported that, epoxy polymer exhibits significantly improved flexural and thermal properties by adding CNTs up to certain percentage loading [6,9-16] . At higher loading of CNTs, there is a premature failure of nanocomposites that is due to poor dispersion leading to agglomeration of CNTs and creation of voids. Even though there are numerous studies adopted to improve the dispersion of CNTs in polymers, there is still no uniformly acceptable process. There is a desperate need to develop an optimum dispersion and fabrication method of nanocomposites. Hence in the current study, investigations were carried out to determine optimal dispersion technique of dispersing two different functionalized MWCNTs. MWCNTs used were functionalized with amine (MWCNTNH<sub>2</sub>) and carboxyl (MWCNT-COOH) groups. A combination of sonication and high shear mixing using 3-roll calendaring system was used to disperse MWCNTs. In addition, two different temperatures were considered for curing the nanocomposites. Effectiveness of these parameters was studied through flexural, thermomechanical and scanning electron microscopy studies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Fabrication Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>SC-15 epoxy procured from Applied Polyremic, Inc., was selected as the matrix in preparation of nanocomposites. SC-15 Epoxy is a two-phase, low viscosity toughened resin system. This resin system is excellent for structural and ballistic applications. SC-15 has two parts: part A consists of diglycidylether of bisphenol-A and aliphatic diglycidilether epoxy toughener whereas part B consists of hardener which is a mixture of cycloaliphatic amine and polyoxylalkylamine. This is room temperature curing resin having viscosity 300 cps, density 1.09 g/cc and pot life of 6 hours. This resin system can be cured at high temperature also.</p><p>Amino functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub>) were procured from Nanocyl, Belgium. These nanotubes (nanocyl-3152) have average diameter of 10 nm, length of 1 micron, carbon purity &gt;95% and functionalization &lt;0.5%. Carboxyl functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH) was procured from Nanostructured &amp; Amorphous Materials Inc., USA. These nanotubes have average diameter of 10 - 20 nm, length of 10 - 30 micron, carbon purity &gt;95% and functionalization &lt;2.1%. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the probable synthesis reaction of carboxyl and amino functionalized CNTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref17">17</xref>]. This figure illustrates that carboxyl group could be formed firstand may have higher number of reactive sites that could lead to better interaction with polymers.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Fabrication</title><p>MWCNTs were mixed with Part A of the epoxy resin system as per required weight ratio. The mixture was then sonicated (Sonics Vibra Cell ultrasonic processor) for 1 hour at 35% amplitude on pulse mode (20 second on/20 second off). During the sonication process, there is a significant increase of pressure and temperature which is highly localized resulting in the increase in temperature of polymer-CNT mixture. In order to reduce this temperature increase, the container was kept in a cooling bath filled with refrigerant maintained at 5˚C. After the sonication process, mixture was added to a 3-roll machine (high shear mixer) for three passes. The gap setting among the rolls was 20 &#181;m (1<sup>st</sup> pass), 10 &#181;m (2<sup>nd</sup> pass) and 5 &#181;m (3<sup>rd</sup> pass) and the highest speed was 150 rpm in each pass. After sonication and calendaring process, Part B of epoxy resin system was added as per stoichometric ratio (Part A:Part B = 10:3) to the 800 rpm. During mechanical stirring, air bubbles are introduced in the resin mixture. To remove entrapped air and volatile materials from the mixture, a degasification process was introduced by placing the mixture in a vacuum oven for 35 minutes at room temperature. Two curing cycles were</p><p>used; in cycle A, the mixture was cured at room temperature for 24 hours and post-cured at 93.33˚C for 4 hours. In cycle B, mixture was cured at 65.56˚C for 5 hours in a convection oven. Schematic diagram of fabrication of nanocomposites with epoxy containing functionalised MWCNTs is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental Procedures</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Flexure Test</title><p>Flexure tests were performed according to ASTM D 790-99 under a three point bend configuration using Zwick Reoll Z 2.5 machine. The machine was run under the displacement control mode at a crosshead speed of 1.2 mm/min. All the tests were performed at room temperature. Test samples were cut according to ASTM D 790-99 where length to thickness was 16:1. At least seven samples were tested from each type.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA)</title><p>Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was performed according to ASTM D4065-01 to study viscoelastic behaviour of composite samples. DMA test was performed using TA Instrument DMA Q 800 operating in a three-point bending mode at an oscillation frequency of 1 Hz and amplitude of 15 &#181;m. The temperature was ramped from 30˚C to 200˚C at a heating rate 5˚C/min. The span length was 35 mm and the span length to thickness ratio was 10. Average sample size was 60 &#215; 12.5 &#215; 3 mm<sup>3</sup>. Data were collected from machine and</p><p>data analysis was performed using Universal Analysis 2000-TA Instruments Inc. data acquisition system. Glass transition temperature, loss modulus and storage modulus of samples were determined from the tests to evaluate the viscoelastic and damping properties of nanocomposites.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Thermo-Mechanical Analysis (TMA)</title><p>Thermo-mechanical analysis (TMA) was performed according to ASTM D696 using TA Instrument Q400 to determine coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of composites. Nitrogen was used during the tests. The samples were cut into small pieces of dimensions 6 &#215; 6 &#215; 4 mm<sup>3</sup>. The dimensional change was measured in the thickness direction. Tests were performed from 30˚C to 200˚C at a heating rate 5˚C/min. Four to five samples were tested for each type.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)</title><p>The analysis of fracture surfaces was carried out using JEOL JSM-6400 scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 5 kV accelerating voltage. Specimen surfaces were positioned on the aluminum holder using carbon tape and coated with a thin gold film to increase their conductance for SEM observation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Flexural Properties</title><p>Flexure tests were performed to evaluate flexural strength and stiffness of neat and nanophased epoxy SC-15 samples and carbon/epoxy laminates. Typical stress-strain curves from flexure tests are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Most of samples failed immediately after reaching maximum stress. Summary of flexure test results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Typical stress-strain behavior from the flexural tests is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a). The stress-strain curves showed considerable non-linearity before reaching the maximum stress, but no obvious yield point was found in the curves Flexure strength and modulus of the nanophased epoxy cured using two cycles increased continuously with MWCNTs content up to 0.2 wt% loading as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Here, neat epoxy SC-15 cured atroom temperature is considered as control sample. Flexural strength and modulus of room temperature cured (cycle A) samples with 0.2 wt% MWCNTsNH<sub>2</sub> improved by 11.3% and 28%, respectively. Samples prepared at high temperature cure (cycle B) with 0.2 wt% MWCNTs-NH<sub>2</sub> loading showed better properties with 31.36% and 37% improvement in flexural strength and modulus, respectively in comparison to control samples. Flexural properties were found to lower with increase in cure time under isothermal condition.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Flexure test results of epoxy SC-15 samples with different wt% of MWCNT-COOH and MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub><sub>.</sub></p><p><img src="1-1810053\6522b3b8-18e5-49a2-92b2-86cb3f520d78.jpg" /></p><p>Similar results have been reported in the literature [18, 19].</p><p>Polymerization process is accelerated at elevated temperatures. Effect of temperature on reaction rates is calculated using the Arrhenius equation.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30183-formula2472"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1810053\95ee40b8-bca5-437b-b015-5fef7b51cf8f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k is the rate coefficient, A is a constant, E<sub>a</sub> is the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the temperature (in kelvin). R has the value of 8.314 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup> kJ&#183;mol<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>&#183;K<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Samples with 0.2 wt% MWCNTs-COOH loading prepared at high temperature cure (cycle B) showed best properties with 41.45% and 48% improvement in flexural strength and modulus, respectively in comparison to control samples. Good dispersion of CNTs and crosslinking of functional groups present on the surface of CNTs with polymer that restricts the mobility of polymerchains enhanced strength and modulus. In addition to good interfacial adhesion between the CNTs and matrix high aspect ratio, high modulus and strength of CNTs, also contribute to enhancement in the properties. However, decrease of strength at higher CNT content can be attributed to following two effects: creation of voids and agglomeration of CNTs in the sample that may have decreased the strength and improper dispersion of CNTs at higher loading. Acoustic cavitation is one of the most efficient methods to disperse nanoparticles at small loading [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref20">20</xref>]. Choi et al. claimed that few voids were created during the fabrication process and that voids increased with the higher nanoparticle contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref21">21</xref>]. Agglomerations of CNTs act as areas of weakness and cause stress concentration leading to lower flexure properties of epoxy samples modified with CNTs at higher loading.</p><p>Figures 4(a)-(f) shows the scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of fractured neat samples and samples with 0.2 wt% and 0.3 wt% CNTs processed at room and high temperature (65.56˚C). Rougher fracture surfaces in were noticed in all samples with 0.2 wt% MWCNTs irrespective of the curing cycle in comparison to neat epoxy samples. A dense rough surface was observed in samples with 0.2 wt% MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> cured at high temperature (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)) whereas much uniform and rougher surface was observed in samples with 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH cured at high temperature (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e)). Figures 4(b) and (c) demonstrated that MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> sample cured at elevated temperature had more closely space rougher surface when compared with that cured at</p><p>room temperature. When the CNTs loading increased to 0.3 wt%, the failure mode of nanocomposite changed. Agglomeration of CNTs was noticeable for both types of CNTs. A crack initiated at an agglomerated location forsample with 0.3 wt% MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)) whereas a localized failure without crack was noticed for sample with 0.3 wt% MWCNT-COOH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). This type of stress concentration could be due to agglomeration of several MWCNTs and formation of bubbles leading to voids due to viscous mix of epoxy and MWCNTs. The fissures or cracks in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d) indicates that samples with 0.3 wt% MWCNT-NH<sub>2&#160; </sub>cured at high temperature cured samples had an earlier stress failure compare to sample with 0.3 wt% MWCNT-COOH cured at high temperature.</p><p>Generally after mixing MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> with epoxy part A, the interfacial reaction takes place between amino functional groups of CNTs and epoxy part A which consists a ring opening reaction followed by a cross-linking reaction creating interlocking as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> contains -NH<sub>2 </sub>group which is a strong nucleophile that opens the epoxide. The resultant product</p><p>contains an epoxide ring. In this way, MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> show cross-linking with epoxy resin. This crosslink reaction creates interlocking structure in the resin blend through the covalent bond which facilitates impediment of the mobility of polymer chains in the system. This improved interfacial interaction may have facilitated better load transfer and thus resulting in increased flexural properties. Similar reasons for improvement in epoxy incorporated with functionalized MWCNTs were also reported previously [1,22] . On the other hand, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the interfacial reaction of MWCNT-COOH and epoxy resin which creates interlocking. Epoxide opening is governed by strong nucleophile. Since -COOH groups are not so strong nucleophile to open the epoxidegroup, they react with epoxy part B which has a pair of electron. The resultant product has -NH<sub>2</sub> which is a strong nucleophile and susceptible to attach the epoxide group and therefore open the epoxide ring. The resultant product contain -OH group which is strong nucleophile and susceptible to react further with epoxy part A. Thus MWCNT-COOH shows cross linking with epoxy system. In our research, MWCNT-COOH has higher functional group (2.1%) than MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> (0.5%). For this higher functionalization in MWCNT-COOH, MWCNT-COOH showed higher cross linking reaction with epoxy system than MWCNT-NH<sub>2 </sub>which&#160; improved interfacial interaction leading to better stress transfer during loading and thus better flexural properties.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Visco-Elastic Properties</title><p>Dynamic mechanical Analysis (DMA) was used for characterization of visco-elastic material properties as function of temperature. Storage modulus, loss modulus and glass transition temperature of fabricated epoxy samples were determined by DMA. Figures 7-9 show the DMA results of epoxy samples. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the average storage modulus, loss modulus and glass transition temperature of epoxy samples with different wt% loading of MWCNT-NH<sub>2 </sub>and MWCNT-COOH. Epoxy samples modified with 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH showed best storage modulus, loss modulus and glass transition temperature. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that storage modulus of samples with 0.2 wt% loading MWCNT-COOH improved by 47% compared to control. Glass transition temperature improved by 13˚C compare to control system.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, positive effect of adding CNTs was ob-</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. DMA results of epoxy polymer.</p><p><img src="1-1810053\5e42dfa9-c330-447d-a308-18d2a7e2d492.jpg" /></p><p>served on storage modulus, loss modulus and glass transition temperature. Glass transition temperatures (T<sub>g</sub>) were determined from onsets of the sharp drop in tan δ curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). T<sub>g</sub> increased by adding CNTs as the mobility is reduced in epoxy matrix around the CNTs by the interfacial bonding and thermal stability became higher [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref16">16</xref>]. The improved interfacial bonding between CNTs and epoxy system can lead to a higher shift of T<sub>g</sub>. The carboxyl-functionalized MWCNTs are supposed to react with epoxy SC-15 and create covalent bonding which is the cause of reduction in matrix mobility and a stronger shift of T<sub>g</sub>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that visco-elastic properties are increasing with addition of CNTs up to 0.2 wt% and then decreases for 0.3 wt%. Formation of micro agglomeration could be a reason for decreasing properties in 0.3 wt% MWNCT samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the storage modulus of epoxy samples in rubbery plateau region. Cross-linked density can be calculated by the storage modulus in this rubbery plateau region (150˚C - 200˚C) by using following equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.30183-formula2473"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-1810053\ef53a435-e091-4e1d-84b5-5b994c8fedee.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this equation, λ is cross-linked density, G is storage modulus in rubbery plateau region, R is universal constant (8.314 J&#183;mol<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>&#183;K<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and T is absolute temperature in Kelvin. Using above equations the calculated crosslinked density values are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, it is observed that the cross-linked density is highest for 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH modified epoxy samples. Because of highest cross-linked density, properties of 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH modified epoxy samples have the best values compared to other types of epoxy samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref24">24</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Thermo-Mechanical Properties</title><p>Thermal expansion of samples was measured by using thermo-mechanical analyzer (TMA). Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) before and after glass transition temperature (T<sub>g</sub>) were measured. Five samples were tested in each type. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the average CTE values of epoxy samples before and after T<sub>g</sub>. It was observed that dimensional change at higher temperature was higher than the dimensional change at lower temperature. The CTE was measured from the slope of curves. The thermal expansion was investigated before (glassy region) and after (rubbery region) glass transition temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.30183-ref25">25</xref>]. In both states, 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH modified epoxy samples showed best improvement compare to neat epoxy samples. When 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH were added to epoxy, CTE value improved by 15% and 25% glassy region and rubbery region respectively as compared to neat samples.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 shows the positive effect of CNTs in CTE values due to good dispersion in epoxy that has reduced the segmental motion of molecules within the resin system. Improvements in properties of MWCNT/epoxy samples prepared using cycle A were comparatively</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Calculated cross link density of epoxy polymer samples.</p><p><img src="1-1810053\9d3a29f4-3842-4272-8ad4-04d9674e56e6.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. TMA results of epoxy polymer samples.<img src="1-1810053\918b8844-946d-4d55-b9da-f1e09cf94252.jpg" /></p><p>lower than samples prepared with cycle B. MWCNT-COOH modified epoxy samples showed better mechanical and thermal properties than MWCNT-NH<sub>2</sub> modified samples. 0.2 wt% MWCNTs modified epoxy samples fabricated with cycle B showed optimum enhancement in strength and modulus. Similar improvements were observed in thermo-mechanical properties. Flexural and thermo-mechanical results demonstrated maximum improvement in 0.2 wt% MWCNT-COOH modified epoxy samples prepared using cycle B.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, two types of functionalized MWCNTs were used to prepare epoxy nanocomposites. Room and elevated temperatures were used for curing the systems after dispersing the CNTs through a combination of sonication and 3-roll mill techniques. Flexural, dynamic mechanical and thermomechanical analyses were carried out. Fracture surfaces of failed samples after flexure test were observed under scanning electron microscope. Results of the study indicate that good dispersion without agglomeration of CNTs is necessary to obtain improvement in properties. At elevated temperature better dispersion is possible due to lowering of the viscosity of the polymer. Good dispersion and higher number of functional groups present in carboxyl-functionalized CNTs processed at elevated temperature resulted in increased cross-link density as determined from dynamic mechanical analysis test resulting in highest flexural, thermal and thermomechanical properties. While it is desirable to have higher number of functional groups, it also results in the damage of CNTs. Hence, there must be an optimal functionalization to ensure better cross-linking without significantly damaging CNTs.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Acknowledgements</title><p>Funding from NSF-EPSCoR (EPS-1158862), NASAEPSCoR (NNX10AN26A) and DoD (W911NF-12-1- 0053) grants is acknowledged.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.30183-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. M. Rahman, S. Zainuddin, M. V. Hosur, J. E. Malone, M. B. A. Salam, A. Kumar and S. Jeelani, “Improvements in Mechanical and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of E-Glass/Epoxy Composites Using Amino Functionalized MWCNTs,” Composite Structures, Vol. 94, No. 8, 2012, pp. 2397-2406. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. B. I. Yakobson, G. Samsonidze and G. G. Samsonidze, “Atomistic Theory of Mechanical Relaxation in Fullerene Nanotubes,” Carbon, Vol. 38, No. 11-12, 2000, pp. 1675-1680. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00093-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. I. Yakobson, C. J. Bracet and J. Bernholc, “Nanomechanics of Carbon Tubes: Instabilities beyond Linear Response,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 76, 1996, pp. 2511-2614. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2511</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Guadagno, B. De Vivo, A. Di Bartolomeo, P. Lamberti, A. Sorrentino, V. Tucci, L. Vertuccio and V. Vittoria, “Effect of Functionalization on the Thermo-Mechanical and Electrical Behavior of Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Composites,” Carbon, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1919-1930. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Spitalsky, L. Matejka, M. Slouf, E. N. Konyushenko, J. Kovarova, J. Zemek and J. Kotek, “Modification of Carbon Nanotubes and Its Effect on Properties of Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Nanocomposites,” Polymer Composites, Vol. 30, No. 10, 2009, pp. 1378-1387.  
doi:10.1002/pc.20701? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Theodore, M. Hosur, J. Thomas and S. Jeelani, “Influence of Functionalization on Properties of MWCNT/ Epoxy Nanocomposites,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 528, No. 3, 2011, pp. 1192-1200.  
doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Mahfuz, S. Zainuddin, M. R. Parker, T. Al-Saadi, V. K. Rangari and S. Jeelani, “Reinforcement of SC-15 Epoxy with CNT/CNF under High Magnetic Field: An Investigation of Mechanical and Thermal Response,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1113-1120.  
doi:10.1007/s10853-008-3161-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. H. Gojny, J. Nastalczyk, Z. Roslaniec and K. Schulte, “Surface Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in CNT/Epoxy-Composites,” Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 370, No. 5-6, 2003, pp. 820-824.  
doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00187-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. H. Liao, O. Marietta-Tondin, Z. Liang, C. Zhang and B. Wang, “Investigation of the Dispersion Process of SWNTs/SC-15 Epoxy Resin Nanocomposites,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 385, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 175-181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Wang, Z. Liang, T. Liu, B. Wang and C. Zhang, “Effective Amino-Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes for Reinforcing Epoxy Polymer Composites,” Nanotechnology, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1551-1557.  
doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/6/003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, U. Kopke, B. Fiedler and K. Schulte, “Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Epoxy-Composites: Enhanced Stiffness and Fracture Toughness at Low Nanotube Content,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 15, 2004, pp. 2363-2371.  
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Breton, G. Désarmot, J. P. Salvetat, S. Delpeux, C. Sinturel, F. Béguin and S. Bonnamy, “Mechanical Properties of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes/Epoxy Composites: Influence of Network Morphology,” Carbon, Vol. 42, No. 5-6, 2004, pp. 1027-1030.  
doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Zhang and D. Jiang, “Interconnected Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Polymer-Matrix Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2011, pp. 466-470.  
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Martone, C. Formicola, M. Giordano and M. Zarrelli, “Reinforcement Efficiency of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Nano Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 70, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1154-1160.  
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.03.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. H. Gojny and K. Schulte, “Functionalisation Effect on the Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour of Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy-Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 15, 2004, pp. 2303-2308.  
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Abdalla, D. Dean, D. Adibempe, E. Nyairo, P. Robinson and G. Thompson, “The Effect of Interfacial Chemistry on Molecular Mobility and Morphology of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Epoxy Nanocomposite,” Polymer, Vol. 48, No. 19, 2007, pp. 5662-5670.  
doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. T. F. T. Ramanathan, R. S. Ruoff and L. C. Brinson, “Amino Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for Binding to Polymers,” Chemical Materials, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1290-1295. doi:10.1021/cm048357f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. G. Villoria, A. Miravete, J. Cuartero, A. Chiminelli and N. Tolosana, “Mechanical Properties of SWNT/Epoxy Composites Using Two Different Curing Cycles,” Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 4-5, 2006, pp. 273-277. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Ci and J. Bai, “The Reinforcement Role of Carbon Nanotubes in Epoxy Composites with Different Matrix Stiffness,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 66, No. 3-4, 2006, pp. 599-603.  
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Zhou, F. Pervin, L. Lewis and S. Jeelani, “Experimental Study on the Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Epoxy,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 452-453, 2007, pp. 657-664.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. K. Choi, K. Sugimoto, S. M. Song, Y. Gotoh, Y. Ohkoshi and M. Endo, “Mechanical and Physical Properties of Epoxy Composites Reinforced by Vapor Grown Carbon Nanofibers,” Carbon, Vol. 43, No. 10, 2005, pp. 2199-2208. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Shen, W. Huang, L. Wu, Y. Hu and M. Ye, “Thermo-Physical Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced with Amino-Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1331-1336.  
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.10.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Ahmad, M. I. Sarwar and J. E. Mark, “Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analysis of Aramid Silica Hybrid Composites Prepared in a Sol-Gel Process,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 63, No. 10, 1996, pp. 1345-1352.  
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970307)63:10&lt;1345::AID-APP14&gt;3.0.CO;2-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Zhu, H. Peng, F. Rodriguez-Macias, J. Margrave, V. Khabashesku, A. Imam, K. Lozano and E. Barrera, “Reinforcing Epoxy Polymer Composites through Covalent Integration of Functionalized Nanotubes,” Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 14, 2004, pp. 643-648.  
doi:10.1002/adfm.200305162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.30183-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. D. Ferry, “Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers,” 3rd Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>