1. IntroductionClobenzorex is a sympathomymethic amine with low addictive activity and with anorexygenic activity that is widely used in Mexico for the treatment of obesity. It is recommended for patients with BMI higher than 30 kg/m2 who did not respond to diet and exercise. Clobenzorex produces its anorexygenic activity by increasing noradrenaline levels; this noradrenaline reduces appetite by activating alpha-4 and beta-1 adrenergic receptors in hypothalamus [1,2].
Clobenzorex has a pKa of 8.8 to 10.4 and after oral administration, clobenzorex is well absorbed in gastrointestinal tract, reaching the maximal concentration in about 1 to 1.5 hours and plasma levels varies between 8 to 47 ng/ml [3,4]. Clobenzorex is widely distributed in tissues, in fact, levels reached in spinal cord fluid are similar to those reached in plasma. It is bound to plasma proteins in about 15% - 30% and is metabolized mainly to 4-hydroxyclobenzorex. Half-life of clobenzorex is widely variable, since values observed are from 1 to 17 hours.
Clobenzorex is eliminar palabra used as an immediate release formulation at dosage regimes of 30 mg b.i.d. [5], however, peak concentration reached may produce a high incidence of side effects and may increase the probability of drug abuse. In order to make the treatment more suitable and reducing both, side effects and probability of drug abuse, a slow release formulation was developed. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and the reduction of body weight of these formulations in overweighted and obese patients under treatment for one month.
2. Subjects, Material and MethodsSixty patients (45 women, 15 men) with body mass index higher than 27 kg/m2 were included in the study. All subjects were evaluated by clinical history, medical examination and suitable laboratory tests, in order to discard any comorbility. All patients that met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two groups of thirty subjects. Comparison of demographic data of treatment groups are given in Table 1. Group one received treatment with immediate release capsules of 30 mg b.i.d. for four weeks, whereas, group two received slow release tablet of 60 mg once a day for the same period. These treatment schemes were employed, since immediate release formulation was prescribe under these conditions and slow release formulation was intend to be used once a day. Once the subjects were assigned to the treatment group they were hospitalized to start the treatment with clobenzorex and after the first dose, blood samples were collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation and stored frozen at −80˚C until analyzed. After obtaining the last blood sample, patients were provided of medication enough for a week and allowed to continue their normal activities. They were instructed to come back to the clinical facilities after a week for evaluation of anthropometric measurements and obtaining through plasma sample. This procedure was repeated on week 2, 3 and 4. After the last dose administration, subjects were maintained in the clinical facilities and blood samples were obtained at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 and 48 h. Plasma was obtained and stored as described above. A final evaluation of anthropometric parameters was carried out.
2.1. Determination of Clobenzorex in PlasmaPlasma levels of clobenzorex were determined by a highperformance liquid chromatographic method coupled to MS/MS detection. Briefly, 0.5 ml were placed in 15 ml conical tubes and added with 12.5 ng of paroxetine as internal standard and 4 ml of methyl-tert-butyl ether. This mixture was agitated in a vortex mixer at maximal speed for 1 minute and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes. Upper layer was transferred to another tube and evaporated to dryness at 35˚C under nitrogen stream. Dry residue was redissolved in 200 µl of mobile phase (see under) and 10 µl aliquots were injected into the chromatographic system.
The chromatographic system was formed by an acquity ultra performance liquid chromatograph (Waters Assoc, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a API-3200 mass/ mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). Separation of compounds was carried out using an acquity UPLC BEH Phenyl 100 mm length × 2.1 mm i.d. of 1.7 µm particle size column eluted with a mixture of methanol with 0.3% formic acid solution (75:25, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The sample were subsequently analyzed by mass spectrometry with an ESI source and then quantified by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The precursor-product ion combinations of m/z 260.1 → 91.1 and m/z 330.1 → 70.0 was used to quantify clobenzorex and internal standard, respectively. Under these conditions, clobenzorex retention time is 1.22 min and paroxetine is 1.29 min and no interferences occurs at this time. Typical chromatograms obtained with the employed method are shown in Figure 1.
Under these conditions, the method was linear in the range of 0.05 to 100 ng/ml, with an intraand inter-day accuracy of 95.33% and the coefficient of variation was lower than 13%.
2.2. Pharmacokinetic and Statistical AnalysisIndividual plasma level-time curves were constructed and maximal concentration (Cmax) and time to reach this
Table 1. Demographic data of subjects enrolled in the study of comparison of pharmacokinetics and body weight after administration of immediate release and slow release formulations of clobenzorex. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. No statistically significant difference in any parameter was obtained.
![]()
maximum (Tmax) were directly obtained of such curves. Area under the plasma concentration against time curve until the last sampling time (AUClast) was obtained by the trapezoidal rule, extrapolation to infinity was carried out by dividing the last concentration observed by the elimination constant rate value [6]. Comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters was carried out by student-t-test. On the other hand, weight and body mass index reduction with the formulations tested were compared by analysis of variance followed by Tukey test.