<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2013.44097</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-29690</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Expressed Parasitism Genes in the Reniform Nematode (&lt;i&gt;Rotylenchulus reniformis&lt;/i&gt;)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>eloame</surname><given-names>T. Nyaku</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Venkateswara</surname><given-names>R. Sripathi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>Wiley</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fares</surname><given-names>Z. Najar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leland</surname><given-names>J. Cseke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Govind</surname><given-names>C. Sharma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bruce</surname><given-names>A. Roe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarah</surname><given-names>Beth Cseke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elica</surname><given-names>Moss</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramesh</surname><given-names>V. Kantety</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Alabama A &amp;amp; M University, Normal, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>he Advanced Centre for Genome Technology, University of Oklahoma, Normal, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>The Advanced Centre for Genome Technology, University of Oklahoma, Normal, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Arthritis &amp;amp; Clinical Immunology Department, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>seloame.nyaku@aamu.edu(ETN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>04</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>780</fpage><lpage>791</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>February</day>	<month>9th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>March</day>	<month>11th,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>30th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
    
   The reniform nematode (RN), Rotylenchulus reniformis, is an agriculturally important pest with a broad host range that results in a large economic impact in tropical, subtropical and in warm temperate zones. In an initial effort to understand the transcriptome and gene expression in RN, we present EST results that reveal numerous putative parasitism-related genes some of which play roles in plant cell wall modification. The characterized contigs included 8362 (40.6%) matches to unique proteins. Coding contigs predicted were 10,656 (51.7%) or 3079 (14.9%), that was similar to those identified in Brugia malayi and Caenorhabditis elegans as reference organisms respectively. Specific transcripts studied in more detail include putative plant parasitism genes, prominent among them were several plant cell wall modification genes. Contigs matching 14 parasitism genes found in sedentary endoparasitic nematodes included expansins, hexosaminidase, glycosyl hydrolases family, 14-3-3 protein, xylanases, glutathione peroxidase, pectate lyase, β-1,4-endoglucanase, major sperm protein, aminopeptidase, c-type lectin, chitin synthase, FMR famide-like peptide, and calreticulin. These genes function in suppression of host defenses and development of feeding sites. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Parasitism Genes; Reniform Nematode; Transcriptome</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Rotylenchulus reniformis, commonly referred to as reniform nematode (RN), is a semi-endoparasitic nematode with a broad host range of over 300 plant species. Infections of RN begin when the female penetrates the root cortex via specialized nematode feeding cells that are regulated by nematode parasitism genes expressed within the esophageal glands, and delivered into the feeding cell through the stylet [1,2]. One major approach employed in expression profiling involving nematode parasitism is transcriptome sequencing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref3">3</xref>]. These studies have enabled identification of genes such as glutathione peroxidase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref4">4</xref>], pectate lyase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref5">5</xref>], polygalacturonase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref6">6</xref>], β-1,4-endoglucanase, β-1,4-endoxylanase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref7">7</xref>], and chorismate mutase [8,9]. Other techniques employed in transcriptome sequencing include Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref10">10</xref>]. This method detects genes through sequencing of tags 14 to 25 bp in length, however, a limitation of this method is having most reads towards the 5’ end of the transcript; again full transcript copies are not obtained. Microarrays have also been applied in quantification of relative expression levels of known genes in the soybean cyst nematode [11-13]. A disadvantage of this technique, however, relates to certain genes not being detected because their sequences are unknown, also cross-hybridization of closely related gene sequences produces unreliable results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref14">14</xref>]. These limitations have been overcome through the use of high throughput sequencing platforms such as the 454/Roche GS-FLX Pyrosequencer in transcriptome profiling, generating sufficient data for full-length transcripts assembly often greater than 5 kb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref15">15</xref>]. The 454 sequencing technique has been extensively used in expression profiling studies and in discovery of novel genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref16">16</xref>]. Extensive information exists for the well-studied plant-parasitic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and the study of nematode biology has greatly increased our understanding of numerous members of nematode genera. Transcriptome sequencing of C. elegans in its first larval stage generated 30 Mb of sequence data and 14% of novel EST sequences (300,000) could effectively be mapped to genomic regions of C. elegans with no known annotated genes or splice variants, contributing to identification of new genetic structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref17">17</xref>]. Genomic resources including expression data for the RN is in its infancy, because to date only 2004 ESTs are available for this nematode in GenBank [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref3">3</xref>]. This therefore necessitates the need for further sequencing of the RN transcriptome using next-generation platforms for identification of parasitic genes. The production and availability of ESTs will also enable investigation of the evolutionary history of nematodes.</p><p>The objective of this study was to generate sufficient coverage ESTs to permit identification of genes that are expressed at elevated levels in cDNA libraries prepared from eggs and vermiform life stages of the RN to identify candidate parasitism genes.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection, Sterilization and Hatching of Reniform Nematode Eggs</title><p>Eggs of RNs cultured on roots of greenhouse-grown Micro-Tom tomato plants, were extracted from the roots and surface disinfested by immersing them in 5% bleach with shaking for 4 minutes in a beaker. The egg-containing solution was then poured through a sterilized 325-mesh sieve nested on a 500-mesh sieve autoclaved using a dry cycle (120˚C for 1 hr). The trapped eggs on the 500-mesh sieve were rinsed immediately with ~300 mL of sterilized distilled water to wash off the bleach for about 5 minutes, and then transferred into sterilized beakers containing 10 mL of sterilized distilled water. One mL of the solution containing the sterilized eggs was placed onto agar plates, these were sealed with Parafilm, and covered with aluminum foil, and placed in an incubator set at 25˚C for 2 to 4 days for the eggs to hatch into Juvenile 1 (J1), and permit growth up to Juvenile 2 (J2) stage on the 8th day.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. RNA Extraction</title><p>Total RNA was extracted from eggs and vermiform stages of pooled nematodes using the PicoPure RNA kit (LifeTechnologies, Grand Island, NY) and treated with RNase-free DNase (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of the RNA was assessed using the Experion<sup>TM</sup> RNA StdSen Analysis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA), and Nanodrop 100 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Construction of cDNA Libraries</title><p>These libraries were constructed using the Creator<sup>TM</sup> SMART<sup>TM</sup> cDNA library kit (Clonetech, CA, USA) using Long Distance PCR (LD PCR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplified products were purified using a Sigma Aldrich GeneElute<sup>TM</sup> PCR CleanUp kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Concentrations of these libraries were assessed using a Nanodrop 100 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE) and TKO 100 fluorometer (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Pyrosequencing (454) and Data Analysis</title><p>Purified constructed cDNA libraries (5 &#181;g) were used in high-throughput sequencing at the Advanced Centre for Genome Technology, University of Oklahoma. The raw reads generated were assembled using the SeqMan Lasergene software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison WI, USA) after removal of primer sequences, poly (A/T) tails, and ribosomal sequences. All EST sequences generated were submitted to GenBank at NCBI under the short read archive (SRA) with accession numbers SRX098224 and SRX098225. BLAST 2.2.21 was downloaded from NCBI ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) and used in creating a local Blast database for initially comparing the RN sequence reads to reniform ESTs available in GenBank with expected value (E) of &lt;1.0e−10. Downloaded reniform ESTs in GenBank [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref3">3</xref>] were assembled into 107 contigs and 519 singletons, using the CLC Genomics Workbench 4.9 with the following parameters: Mismatch cost = 2, insertion cost = 3, deletion cost = 3, length fraction = 0.5, similarity = 0.9, alignment = global, conflict resolution = vote (A, C, G, and T), word size = automatic, non-specific matches = random and minimum contig length = 200. ESTs were then accessed for their coding potential using the AUGUSTUS gene prediction software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref18">18</xref>] with B. malayi and C. elegans serving as model organisms. This tool employs a Generalized Hidden Markov Model (GHMM), defined by probability distributions for portions of genomic sequences thus identifying an optimal parse for a given genomic sequence and divides the sequence into states based on statistical models.</p><p>The universal Gene Ontology annotation, visualization, and analysis tool, (Blast2go) http://blast2go.org was employed for annotation of the functions and identification of protein-coding genes within our ESTs. The gene ontology (GO) classification scheme was used in categorizing transcripts by their putative function. These analyses were categorized into molecular function, biological process, and cellular components. Candidate parasitism genes were identified by restricting BlastX search with expected value (E) of &lt;1.0e−10. Potential homologs in other nematodes within the reniform ESTs were through comparisons with NCBI EST others database using TBlastX. Further, comparisons of our sequences were with ESTs of C. elegans, B. malayi, Meloidogyne incognita, and Pristionchus pacificus with E-values of &lt;1.0e−10.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Analysis of the Reniform Nematode Transcriptome</title><p>Over 50,000 sequence reads were generated from the RN transcriptome, resulting in more than 4 Mb (4,781,676 bases) of data that were assembled into 20,596 contigs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Assembly of the RN raw reads downloaded from GenBank resulted in 107 contigs and 519 singletons (626 unigenes). Comparison of our ESTs to those assembled from GenBank identified 617 entries out of which 553 were unique. The alignment lengths for homology varied from 32 to 754 bp, with similarities of greater than 77%. We therefore observed 209/626 (33.4%) unique GenBank ESTs with matches to our 410/20,596 (1.9%) sequence reads.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Gene Ontology (GO) Assignments and AUGUSTUS Gene Predictions</title><p>The most highly represented activities under each of these categories were ATP binding (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), oxidation-reduction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), and integral to membrane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) for molecular function, biological process, and cellular components respectively. Among the several contigs generated, 10,656 (51.7%) and 3079 (14.9%) coded for genes using B. malayi and C. elegans, as reference organisms respectively. More contigs coded for genes with B. malayi serving as a reference organism probably because of the parasitic nature of B. malayi as opposed to the free living nature of C. elegans. Sixteen contigs were predicted to code for genes both by C. elegans and B. malayi (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). These contigs could further be studied because they may probably be involved in</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Reniform nematode transcriptome assembly.</p><p>house-keeping roles. TBlastX analysis produced 11,588 matches (56.3%) with assigned functions. Majority of hits were observed with B. malayi, (620/11,588 or 5.4%). Further comparative analysis between RN ESTs predicted to code for genes by AUGUSTUS using B. malayi as the model organism (10,656 ESTs) with BlastX hits (11,588) and ESTs with GO IDs (8362) resulted in 179 and 135 matches, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Similarly, when C. elegans was used as a model organism, 149 TBlastX hits and 99 ESTs with GO IDs matched with ESTs coding for genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). This analysis suggests that, majority of contigs predicted to code for genes have not been fully annotated within the reniform transcriptome. A full list of contigs with GOs and functions is available.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Sixteen common EST contigs among C. elegans and B. malayi predicted by AUGUSTUS with annotations.</p><p>Comparative analysis between RN ESTs and M. incognita revealed that 10.5% of RN sequences matched those of M. incognita. The RN ESTs also had 0.8% matches to both B. malayi and C. elegans ESTs, although more EST contigs were predicted to code for genes (Figures 4 and 5). These low percentages could be as a result of phylogenetic distance of these nematodes from the RN, and also the nature of some of the ESTs which may not be of full length. The least organism having matches to the RN ESTs was P. pacificus (0.7%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The complete list of Blastn analysis between RN ESTs and these nematodes is available</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Identification of Nematode Parasitism Genes</title><p>Fourteen plant parasitic nematode genes critical to modification of plant cell walls were identified within our RN ESTs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). These had expected values (E) of &lt;1.0e−10 to regions of homology with parasitic genes in other nematodes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The nematode parasitism genes identified include expansins, hexosaminidase, glycosyl hydrolases family, 14-3-3 protein, xylanases, glutathione peroxidase, pectate lyase, β-1,4-endoglucanase, major sperm protein, aminopeptidase, c-type lectin, chitin synthase, FMR famide-like peptide, and calreticulin. The nematode parasitome consists mostly of secreted gene products critical in plant parasitism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref19">19</xref>]. Among these are expansin and xylanase which are cellwall modifying proteins. Expansins digest cell walls by</p><p>cleaving the non-covalent bonds and thus enhancing the activities of cell wall-degrading, carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) [20,21]. A second class of enzyme identified within the RN ESTs was hexosaminidase (glycosyl hydrolases), which is highly conserved across certain domains of bacteria and human. The β-Hexosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.52), has a specific role in removal of terminal protein glycosylation with O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) residues found in glycoproteins and glycolipids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref22">22</xref>]. The RNMSTG1_10661 contig had homology to the hexosaminidase gene (Cbr-hex-3) within B. malayi, suggesting the presence of this enzyme in the RN genome. Chitinases belong to glycosyl hydrolases family (EC 3.2.1.14), known to be involved in hydrolysis of β-1,4-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine linkages in chitin polymers. They catalyze reactions by hydrolyzing glycosidic bonds between two carbohydrate molecules, or a carbohydrate and a non-carbohydrate molecule, and have been identified in filarial nematodes [23,24]. The RNMSTG1_5271 contig had homology to a chitinase gene (Bm1_51425A) in B. malayi, indicating the involvement of this enzyme probably in hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in chitin during RN parasitism. SXPRAL-2, 14-3-3, and RanBPM-like family proteins participate in regulation of cell-cycle, calcium ion binding, defense regulation mechanisms, and may act as molecular chaperones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref20">20</xref>]. Within the RN ESTs, the ftt-2 gene belonging to 14-3-3 protein class was identified in the RNMSTG1_4096 contig, and had homologs in C. briggsae, C. elegans, C. brenneri, C. remanei, and Ancylostoma</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Candidate parasitism genes identified within the RN ESTs.</p><p><img src="3-2600709\80d9b51c-7cc8-469a-8dcb-75a3ad776325.jpg" /></p><p>Continued</p><p><img src="3-2600709\670f7468-da08-45d9-834a-5b4a375b75b5.jpg" /></p><p>caninum. Xylanase is a component of hemicellulose, which functions in cleaving β-1,4-linkage of xylopyranose subunits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref25">25</xref>]. The presence of xylanase in the RN ESTs, specifically in the RNMSTG1_6909 contig with homology to RS-xyl1 gene in Radopholus similis may suggest the importance of this enzyme in RN genome for the breakdown of xylan during parasitism. Glutathione peroxidases (GpX) plays roles in protecting animal parasitic nematodes through removal of hydrogen peroxide defensively released by plants in response to nematode attack [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref26">26</xref>]. This enzyme complex also catalyzes the conversion of peroxidised fatty acids to alcohols. The RNMSTG1_2532 contig had matches to gxp2 gene in G. rostochiensis while RNMSTG1_6876 contig had significant identity to gxp1, clle4.1, and Bm1_40465 genes in G. rostochiensis, C. elegans, and B. malayi, respectively, suggesting the importance of glutathione peroxidase in the RN for parasitism. The RNMSTG1_17025 contig encoded a pectate lyase gene (pel-1) gene previously cloned in M. incognita. Pectate lyases are commonly associated with proteomes of bacterial and fungal pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref27">27</xref>], and disrupt the glycosidic bonds in the primary cell wall and in middle lamella [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref28">28</xref>]. These enzymes act as pathogenicity factors, because of their disruptive nature to host cell walls [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref29">29</xref>]. A qPCR and RNAi analysis in H. glycines targeting pectate lyase revealed an increase in male: female ratios after J2 nematodes were soaked in a solution containing double-stranded (ds) RNA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref30">30</xref>]. In another study involving M. incognita, two cDNAs (Mi-pel-1 and Mi-pel-2) encoding pectate lyase have been isolated from the esophageal gland-cell through subtractive cDNA libraries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref31">31</xref>]. The β-1,4-endoglucanase gene identified in our RN ESTs, showed high homology to the endoglucanases of M. incognita and R. similis respectively. Cellulases belong to the glycosyl hydrolase family 5 and similarity of these genes to bacterial homologs suggests that, they may have been acquired through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref1">1</xref>]. These genes have also been identified in H. glycines, G. rostochiensis, M. incognita, B. xylophilus, P. penetrans, and Heterodera spp. Respectively [32-40]. In invertebrates including nematodes, sperms serve as signals involved in meiosis during the arrested oocytes developmental stage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref41">41</xref>]. The MSP has been identified as a 14.1-kD peptide using MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref42">42</xref>], and known to suppress Heterodera glycines reproduction in transgenic soybeans plants expressing specific siRNAs to the MSP gene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref43">43</xref>]. The RNMSTG1_4729 and RNMSTG1_7752</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Candidate parasitism genes identified within the RN ESTs and their E-values.</p><p><img src="3-2600709\f3394ec7-f826-4d11-9296-6a85eea47830.jpg" /></p><p>contigs encoded MSP genes suggesting the importance of the MSP in RN reproduction. Aminopeptidases are known to mediate processes such as neuropeptide and signal transduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref44">44</xref>], embryo nourishment and digestion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref45">45</xref>], molting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref46">46</xref>], and reproduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref47">47</xref>]. These enzymes can serve as targets for nematode control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref48">48</xref>]. The RNMSTG1_10134, RNMSTG1_101, and RNMSTG1_16353 contigs had matches to lap-1, amp-1, and Bm1_08285 genes in C. elegans, H. glycines, and B. malayi, respectively. C-type lectin, a pathogen recognition protein was identified within the RN dataset. The RNMSTG1_1637 contig showed high homology to the clec-180 gene. In C. elegans silencing of this gene through RNAi, resulted in decrease in cyst nematode numbers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref49">49</xref>]. The RNMSTG1_13256 contig encoded for the chitin synthase gene which has been previously silenced in M. artiellia hindering the formation and survival of the eggs in this nematode [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref50">50</xref>]. Chitin is an important component in the fungal cell wall, cuticle of insects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref51">51</xref>], and nematodes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref52">52</xref>]. This structure is composed of β-1,4 linked N-acetylglucosamine residue chains. FMRFamide-like peptides or FLPs identified in our ESTs are a class of neuropeptides with specific roles in sensory and motor activities in nematodes, and also serve as neurotransmitters or neuromodulators within the nervous system. Recently, two of these genes flp-12 and flp-16 have been cloned and characterized in H. avenae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref53">53</xref>]. These genes have been proposed to serve as critical targets for plant parasitic nematode management. The C-terminal signature (Arg-Phe-NH2) of these peptides is highly conserved across C. elegans, A. suum, and M. incognita. Three of the reniform contigs coded for this class of genes. Calreticulins are a class of calcium-binding proteins, which are conserved in both plants and animals. These proteins are localized in the endoplasmic reticulum and primarily act as chaperones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref54">54</xref>]. Other functions of calreticulins include transportation of proteins from the nucleus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref54">54</xref>], mRNA degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref55">55</xref>], cell adhesion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref56">56</xref>], calcium regulation, cell cycle, endocytosis, exocytosis, secretion, and cell growth and differentiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref57">57</xref>]. Calreticulins are abundant in the esophageal secretions of nematodes especially at the nematode feeding sites (NFS). An example is Mi-CRT gene synthesized in the esophageal glands of M. incognita [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29690-ref58">58</xref>]. Three RN contigs were homologous with calreticulins of M. incognita and B. malayi respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Conclusion</title><p>This study has generated a number of novel transcripts with hitherto unknown function that will need further characterization. The nematode parasitism gene identified here could serve as RNAi targets for investigating plant resistance against RNs and be further explored through functional analysis for effective design of management strategies</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by grants to RVK and/or to GCS: USDA-CSREES Grant # 2004-38814-15160, USDA ALAX-011-706 and NSF/PGRP award #DBI 0703470 and Agricultural Experiment Station. This is Journal article # 656 of Alabama A &amp; M Agricultural Experiment Station.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Abbreviations</title><p>ATP: Adenosine Triphosphate;</p><p>EST: Expressed Sequence Tag;</p><p>GO: Gene Ontology;</p><p>LD PCR: Long Distance Polymerase Chain Reaction;</p><p>MSP: Major Sperm Protein;</p><p>NFS: Nematode Feeding Site;</p><p>SRA: Short Read Achieve.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.29690-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. L. Davis, R. S. Hussey, T. J. Baum, J. Bakker and A. Schots, “Nematode Parasitism Genes,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, Vol. 38, 2000, pp. 365-396.  
doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.365</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. L. Davis, R. S. Hussey and T. J. Baum, “Getting to the Roots of Parasitism by Nematodes,” Trends in Parasitology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2004, pp. 134-141.  
doi:10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. J. Wubben, F. E. Callahan and B. S. Scheffler, “Transcript Analysis of Parasitic Females of the Sedentary Semi-Endoparasitic Nematode Rotylenchulus reniformis,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Vol. 172, No. 1, 2010, pp. 31-40. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. T. Jones, B. Reavy, G. Smant and A. E. Prior, “Glutathione Peroxidases of the Potato Cyst Nematode Globodera rostochiensis,” Gene, Vol. 324, 2004, pp. 47-54.  
doi:10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Popeijus, H. Overmars, J. Jones, V. Blok, A. Goverse, J. Helder, A. Schots, J. Bakker and G. Smant, “Degradation of Plant Cell Walls by a Nematode,” Nature, Vol. 406, 2000, pp. 36-37. doi:10.1038/35017641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Jaubert, J. B. Laffaire, P. Abad and M. N. Rosso, “A Polygalacturonase of Animal Origin Isolated from the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita,” FEBS Letters, Vol. 522, No. 1-3, 2002, pp. 109-112.  
doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02906-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Dautova, N. Rosso, P. Abad, F. J. Gommers, J. Bakker and G. Smant, “Single Pass cDNA Sequencing—A Powerful Tool to Analyse Gene Expression in Pre-Parasitic Juveniles of the Southern Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita,” Nematology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2001, pp. 29-139. doi:10.1163/156854101750236259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. N. Lambert, K. D. Allen and I. M. Sussex, “Cloning and Characterization of an Esophageal-Gland-Specific Chorismate Mutase from the Phytoparasitic Nematode Meloidogyne javanica,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1999, pp. 593-601.  
doi:10.1094/MPMI-18-0593</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. T. Jones, C. Furlanetto, E. Bakker, B. Banks, V. Blok, Q. Chen, M. Phillips and A. Prior, “Characterization of a Chorismate Mutase from the Potato Cyst Nematode Globodera pallida,” Molecular Plant Pathology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43-50.  
doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00140.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. E. Velculescu, L. Zhang, B. Vogelstein and K. W. Kinzler, “Serial Analysis of Gene Expression,” Science, Vol. 270, No. 5235, 1995, pp. 484-487.  
doi:10.1126/science.270.5235.484</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. P. Puthoff, D. Nettleton, S. R. Rodermel and T. J. Baum, “Arabidopsis Gene Expression Changes during Cyst Nematode Parasitism Revealed by Statistical Analyses of Microarray Expression Profiles,” Plant Journal, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2003, pp. 911-921.  
doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01677.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Khan, N. Alkharouf, H. Beard, M. MacDonald, I. Chouikha, S. Meyer, J. Grefenstette, H. Knap and B. Matthews, “Microarray Analysis of Gene Expression in Soybean Roots Susceptible to the Soybean Cyst Nematode Two Days Post Invasion,” Journal of Nematology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2004, pp. 241-248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. M. de Boer, J. P. McDermott, X. Wang, T. Maier, F. Qui, R. S. Hussey, E. L. Davis and T. J. Baum, “The Use of DNA Microarrays for the Developmental Expression Analysis of cDNAs from the Oesophageal Gland Cell Region of Heterodera glycines,” Molecular Plant Pathology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2002, pp. 261-270.  
doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00122.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Kothapalli, S. J. Yoder, S. Mane and T. P. Loughran Jr., “Microarray Results: How Accurate Are They?” BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 3, 2002, p. 22.  
doi:10.1186/1471-2105-3-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. Leamon, M. S. Braverman and J. M. Rothberg, “High-Throughput, Massively Parallel DNA Sequencing Technology for the Era of Personalized Medicine,” Gene Therapy and Regulation, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2007, pp. 15-31.  
doi:10.1142/S1568558607000046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. T. Torres, M. Metta, B. Ottenwalder and C. Schlotterer, “Gene Expression Profiling by Massively Parallel Sequencing,” Genome Research, Vol. 18, 2008, pp. 172-177.  
doi:10.1101/gr.6984908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Shin, M. Hirst, M. N. Bainbridge, V. Magrini, E. Mardis, D. G. Moerman, M. A. Marra, D. L. Baillie and S. J. M. Jones, “Transcriptome Analysis for Caenorhabditis elegans Based on Novel Expressed Sequence Tags,” BMC Biology, Vol. 6, 2008, p. 14.  
doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Stanke, M. Diekhans, R. Baertsch and D. Haussler, “Using Native and Syntenically Mapped cDNA Alignments to Improve de Novo Dene Finding,” Bioinformatics, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2008, pp. 637-644.  
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Hussey, E. L. Davis and T. J. Baum, “Secrets in Secretions: Genes That Control Nematode Parasitism in Plants,” Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2002, pp. 183-194.  
doi:10.1590/S1677-04202002000300002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. G. Mitchum, R. S. Hussey, E. L. Davis and T. J. Baum, “Application of Biotechnology to Understand Pathogenesis of Nematode Plant Pathogens,” In: Z. K. Punja, S. DeBoer and H. Sanfacon, Eds., Biotechnology &amp; Plant Disease Management, CABI International, 2007, pp. 58-86. doi:10.1079/9781845932886.0058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Qin, U. Kudla, E. H. A. Roze, A. Goverse, H. Popeijus, H. O. Nieuwland, J. T. Jones, A. Schots, G. Smant, J. Bakker and J. Helder, “A Nematode Expansin Actingon Plants,” Nature, Vol. 427, 2004, p. 30.  
doi:10.1038/427030a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Gutternigg, D. Rendic, R. Voglauer, T. Iskratsch and I. B. H. Wilson, “Mammalian Cells Contain a Second Nucleocytoplasmic Hexosaminudase,” Biochemical Journal, Vol. 419, 2009, pp. 83-90. doi:10.1042/BJ20081630</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Flach, P. E. Pilet and P. Jollés, “What’s New in Chitinase Research,” Experientia, Vol. 48, No. 8, 1992, pp. 701-716. doi:10.1007/BF02124285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. A. Fuhrman, W. S. Lane, R. F. Smith, W. F. Piessens and F. B. Perler, “Transmission-Blocking Antibodies Recognize Microfilarial Chitinase in Brugian Lymphatic Filariasis,” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of United States, Vol. 89, No. 5, 1992, pp. 1548-1552.  
doi:10.1073/pnas.89.5.1548</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Collins, C. Gerday and G. Feller, “Xylanases, Xylanase Families and Extremophilic Xylanases,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2005, pp. 3-23.  
doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.06.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. H. Waetzig, M. Sobczak and F. M. W. Grundler, “Localization of Hydrogen Peroxide during the Defence Response of Arabidopsis thaliana Against the Plant Parasitic Nematode Heterodera glycines,” Nematology, Vol. 1, No. 7-8, 1999, pp. 681-686. doi:10.1163/156854199508702</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. R. Herron, J. A. E. Benen, R. D. Scavetta, J. Visser and F. Jurnak, “Structure and Function of Pectic Enzymes: Virulence Factors of Plant Pathogens,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States, Vol. 97, No. 16, 2000, pp. 8762-8769.  
doi:10.1073/pnas.97.16.8762</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. D. Yoder, N. T. Keen and F. Jurnak, “New Domain Motif: The Structure of Pectate Lyase C, a Secreted Plant Virulence Factor,” Science, Vol. 260, No. 5113, 1993, pp. 1503-1507. doi:10.1126/science.8502994</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Alghisi and F. Favaron, “Pectin-Degrading Enzyme and Plant-Parasite Interactions,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, Vol. 101, No. 4, 1995, pp. 365-375.  
doi:10.1007/BF01874850</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Bakhetia, P. E. Urwin and H. J. Atkinson, “qPCR Analysis and RNAi Define Pharyngeal Gland Cell-Expressed Genes of Heterodera glycines Required for Initial Interactions with the Host,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2007, pp. 306-312.  
doi:10.1094/MPMI-20-3-0306</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Huang, R. Dong, R. Allen, E. L. Davis, T. J. Baum and R. S. Hussey, “Developmental Expression and Molecular Analysis of Two Meloidogyne incognita Pectate Lyase Genes,” International Journal for Parasitology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2005, pp. 685-692.  
doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.01.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Smant, J. P. W. G. Stokkermans, Y. T. Yan, J. M. de Boer, T. J. Baum, X. H. Wang, R. S. Hussey, F. J. Gommers, B. Henrissat, E. L. Davis, J. Helder, A. Schots and J. Bakker, “Endogenous Cellulases in Animals: Isolation of Beta-1,4-Endoglucanase Genes from Two Species of Plant-Parasitic Cyst Nematodes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States, Vol. 95, No. 9, 1998, pp. 4906-4911. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.4906</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Yan, G. Smant, J. Stokkermans, L. Qin, J. Helder, T. J. Baum, A. Schots and E. L. Davis, “Genomic Organization of Four β-1,4-Endoglucanase Genes in Plant-Parasitic Cyst Nematodes and Its Evolutionary Implications,” Gene, Vol. 220, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 61-70.  
doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00413-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. de Meutter, T. Tytgat, E. Van der Schueren, G. Smant, A. Schots, A. Coomans, M. Van Montagu and G. Gheysen, “Cloning of Two Endoglucanase Genes from Heterodera schachtii,” Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen, Universiteit Gent, Vol. 63, 1998, pp. 619-623.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Gao, R. Allen, T. Maier, E. L. Davis, T. J. Baum and R. S. Hussey, “Defining a Plant-Parasitic Nematode: A Profile of Putative Parasitism Genes Expressed in the Esophageal Gland Cells of Heterodera glycines,” Nematology, Vol. 4, 2002, p. 218.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Goellner, G. Smant, J. M. De Boer, T. J. Baum and E. L. Davis, “Isolation of Beta-1,4-Endoglucanase Genes from Globodera tabacum and Their Expression during Parasitism,” Journal of Nematology, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2000, pp. 154-165.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Kikuchi, J. T. Jones, T. Aikawa, H. Kosaka and N. Ogura, “A Family of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 45 Cellulases from the Pine Wood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus,” FEBS Letters, Vol. 572, No. 1-3, 2004, pp. 201-205. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. N. Rosso, B. Favery, C. Piotte, L. Arthaud, J. M. De Boer, R. S. Hussey, J. Bakker, T. J. Baum and P. Abad, “Isolation of a cDNA Encoding a Beta-1,4-Endoglucanase in the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita and Expression Analysis during Plant Parasitism,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1999, pp. 585-591. doi:10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.7.585</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Uehara, A. Kushida and Y. Momota, “PCR-Based Cloning of Two β-1,4-Endoglucanases from the Root-Lesion Nematode Pratylenchus penetrans,” Nematology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2001, pp. 335-341.  
doi:10.1163/156854101317020259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Yan, G. Smant and E. L. Davis, “Functional Screening Yields a New Beta-1,4-Endoglucanase Gene from Heterodera glycines That May Be the Product of Recent Gene Duplication,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001, pp. 63-71.  
doi:10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.1.63</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Masui, “Meiotic Arrest in Animal Oocytes,” In: A. Monroy and C. B. Metz, Eds., Biology of Fertilization, Vol. 1, Academic Press, Orlando, 1985, pp. 189-219.  
doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-492601-1.50014-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Miller, V. Q. Nguyen, M. H. Lee, M. Kosinski, T. Schedl, R. M. Caprioli and D. Greenstein, “A Sperm Cytoskeletal Protein That Signals Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Ovulation,” Science, Vol. 291, No. 5511, 2001, pp. 2144-2147. doi:10.1126/science.1057586</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. M. Steeves, T. C. Todd, J. S. Essig and H. N. Trick, “Transgenic Soybeans Expressing siRNAs Specific to a Major Sperm Protein Gene Suppress Heterodera glycines Reproduction,” Functional Plant Biology, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2006, pp. 991-999. doi:10.1071/FP06130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. P. Masler, “Aminopeptidases in Caenorhabditis elegans and Panagrellus redivivus: Detection Using Peptide and Non-Peptide Substrates,” Journal of Helminthology, Vol. 76, No. 1, 2002, pp. 45-52. doi:10.1079/JOH200193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. R. Brooks, N. M. Hooper and R. E. Isaac, “The Caenorhabditis elegans Orthologue of Mammalian Puromycin-Sensitive Aminopeptidase has Roles in Embryogenesis and Reproduction,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 278, 2003, pp. 42795-47801.  
doi:10.1074/jbc.M306216200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Hong and J. Bouvier, “Brugia pahangi: Identification and Characterization of an Aminopeptidase Associated with Larval Molting,” Experimental Parasitology, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1993, pp. 127-133.  
doi:10.1006/expr.1993.1015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. J. Lilley, S. A. Goodchild, H. J. Atkinson and P. E. Urwin, “Cloning and Characterization of a Heterodera glycines Aminopeptidase cDNA,” International Journal for Parasitology, Vol. 35, No. 14, 2005, pp. 1577-1585.  
doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. G. Maule, A. Mousley, N. J. Marks, T. A. Day, D. P. Thompson, T. G. Geary and D. W. Halton, “Neuropeptide Signaling Systems-Potential Drug Targets for Parasite and Pest Control,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2002, pp. 733-758.  
doi:10.2174/1568026023393697</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. E. Urwin, C. J. Lilley and H. J. Atkinson, “Ingestion of Double-Stranded RNA by Pre-Parasitic Juvenile Cyst Nematodes Leads to RNA Interference,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2002, pp. 747-752.  
doi:10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.8.747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Fanelli, M. Di Vito, J. T. Jones and C. De Giorgi, “Analysis of Chitin Synthase Function in a Plant Parasitic Nematode, Meloidogyne artiellia, Using RNAi,” Gene, Vol. 349, 2005, pp. 87-95.  
doi:10.1016/j.gene.2004.11.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. F. Bird and P. G. Self, “Chitin in Meloidogyne javanica,” Fundamental &amp; Applied Nematology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1995, pp. 235-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. T. Harris and J. A. Fuhrman, “Structure and Expression of Chitin Synthase in the Parasitic Nematode Dirofilaria immitis,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Vol. 122, No. 2, 2002, pp. 231-234.  
doi:10.1016/S0166-6851(02)00102-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Thakur, A. Sharma, S. B. Rao, M. Kumar, N. G. Prasad, N. Tyagi, D. Kamaraju, P. Papolu, P. Banakar and U. Rao, “Cloning and Characterization of Two Neuropeptide Genes from Cereal Cyst Nematode, Heterodera avenae from India,” Bioinformation, Vol. 8, No. 13, 2012, pp. 617-621. doi:10.6026/97320630008617</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. M. Holaska, B. E. Black, F. Rastinejad and B. M. Paschal, “Ca2+-Dependent Nuclear Export Mediated by Calreticulin,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol. 22, No. 17, 2002, pp. 6286-6297.  
doi:10.1128/MCB.22.17.6286-6297.2002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Nickenig, F. Michaelsen, C. Muller, A. Berger, T. Vogel, A. Sachinidis, H. Vetter and M. Bohm, “Destabilization of AT(1) Receptor mRNA by Calreticulin,” Circulation Research, Vol. 90, 2002, pp. 53-58.  
doi:10.1161/hh0102.102503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Goicoechea, M. A. Pallero, P. Eggleton, M. Michalak and J. E. Murphy-Ullrich, “The Anti-Adhesive Activity of Thrombospondin Is Mediated by the N-Terminal Domain of Cell Surface Calreticulin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 277, 2002, pp. 37219-37228.  
doi:10.1074/jbc.M202200200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Michalak, J. M. R. Parker and M. Opas, “Ca2+ Signaling and Calcium Binding Chaperones of the Endoplasmic Reticulum,” Cell Calcium, Vol. 32, No. 5-6, 2002, pp. 269-278. doi:10.1016/S0143416002001884</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29690-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Jaubert, A. L. Milac, A. J. Petrescu, J. Almeida-Engler, P. Abad and M. Rosso, “In Planta Secretion of a Calreticulin by Migratory and Sedentary Stages of Root-Knot Nematode,” Molecular Plant Microbe-Interactions, Vol. 18, No. 12, 2005, pp. 1277-1284.  
doi:10.1094/MPMI-18-1277</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>