<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMNTA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9479</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijmnta.2013.21A013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJMNTA-29435</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Weight Function in Nonlinear Part on Global Solvability of Cauchy Problem for Semi-Linear Hyperbolic Equations
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>kbar</surname><given-names>B. Aliev</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anar</surname><given-names>A. Kazimov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of NAS of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>alievakbar@math.ab.az(KBA)</email>;<email>anarkazimov1979@gmail.com(AAK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>03</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>102</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this paper, we investigate the effect of weight function in the nonlinear part on global solvability of the Cauchy problem for a class of semi-linear hyperbolic equations with damping. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cauchy Problem; Wave Equation; Global Solvability; Weight Function; Semi-Linear Hyperbolic Equation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Consider the Cauchy problem for the semi-linear wave equation with damping</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121587"><label>, (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\cdb67fc4-17ef-4c73-bba3-a9ca951bc751.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121588"><label>, (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\62ff2f3b-5dc3-448f-9db8-9b24ef9a4847.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="6-2340069\0992fbf1-d34d-4d8c-97fe-9137a1a96d61.jpg" />, <img src="6-2340069\c126e91d-05f8-4f19-bb0e-02a97b62c788.jpg" /></p><p>In the case when <img src="6-2340069\3aa5b23d-291c-47c6-87ad-2494c5afaeca.jpg" /> is independent of<img src="6-2340069\f2a9a7ef-1375-4880-a373-e72b9c7f209e.jpg" />, the existence and nonexistence of the global solutions was investigated in the papers [1-8]. The authors interests are focused on so called critical exponent<img src="6-2340069\2f686a69-910f-441e-9ae1-8c76a7c15c35.jpg" />, which is the number defined by the following property: if <img src="6-2340069\39d18c16-8e3f-4fc2-a119-2462ac12369c.jpg" /> then all small data solutions of corresponding Cauchy problem have a global solution, while <img src="6-2340069\7dcb595f-edb7-4026-ba23-7b07b2aa29b8.jpg" /> all solutions with data positive on blow up in finite time regardless of the smallness of the data.</p><p>In the present paper we investigate the effect of the weight function <img src="6-2340069\aa1f850b-ae47-4bad-9d0a-61a2e093658d.jpg" /> on global solvability of Cauchy problems (1) and (2).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Statement of Main Results</title><p>We consider the Cauchy problem for a class of semilinear hyperbolic equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121589"><label>, (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\e3cf96f0-57e2-4c05-a41d-5fd2867f167d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121590"><label>, (4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\b7ede150-52af-4cbd-8cbe-69c6ceb948d2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="6-2340069\f41338bb-c2d1-435b-9fc4-941746bef34c.jpg" /></p><p>Throughout this paper, we assume that the nonlinear term <img src="6-2340069\6a06a46d-618f-4592-a8a1-f61574aa6058.jpg" /> satisfies the following conditions:</p><p>1)<img src="6-2340069\8b2a4c5b-134a-43d4-89f6-e0c6c138629c.jpg" /> and <img src="6-2340069\5c40e914-6cfd-4b08-a0dd-7e6320c9b492.jpg" /> are continuous functions in the domain<img src="6-2340069\afb74105-79c3-4534-8db4-e58bbdfdcc5c.jpg" />.</p><p>2)<img src="6-2340069\60616d14-d7a3-4679-ba35-2198795f2121.jpg" />, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121591"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\4c8f6c48-fb78-4337-ad92-4f29965af763.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121592"><label>, (6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\656bf47a-e5f4-458e-bed9-9dff04fe8385.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121593"><label>, (7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\ded4ddfd-4821-40d2-87c2-e3fb5924b062.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121594"><label>. (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\883ce557-b825-4f48-a818-ebd836c8d8ec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the sequel, by<img src="6-2340069\b5187521-3aa4-4923-94da-a7c7ae030c1b.jpg" />, we denote the usual <img src="6-2340069\7499438e-19b3-4ee4-a711-ea0b426f9fdb.jpg" />- norm. For simplicity of notation, in particular, we write <img src="6-2340069\ca7f0c8f-99f8-46b9-8878-dc7b0a8bcaf5.jpg" /> instead of<img src="6-2340069\04a27644-f246-4b1d-b1de-6a58cf04a805.jpg" />. The constants C, c used throughout this paper are positive generic constants, which may be different in various occurrences.</p><p>Theorem 1. Suppose that the conditions (5)-(8) are satisfied. Then there exists a real number <img src="6-2340069\6d9c378b-760b-408c-b4c8-1291a7cac442.jpg" /> such that, if</p><p><img src="6-2340069\3b581167-2168-4cc1-9e2a-65c083cfa2b4.jpg" /></p><p>Then problem (3) and (4) admit a unique solution</p><p><img src="6-2340069\9e3c3ecc-d084-4ea3-8d2e-c03118972078.jpg" /></p><p>satisfied the decay property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121595"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\3fcb0341-8620-4b4b-bcaf-6269a7655175.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121596"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\165fe3f2-feaf-4389-9196-bb441782d8de.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="6-2340069\554d7e43-5ebf-4583-8570-b0fe255751de.jpg" />,<img src="6-2340069\de2b7c8e-53ef-4a60-b151-1c86bce5aeef.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Proof of Theorem 1</title><p>It is well known that if</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121597"><label>, (11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\e81d67f8-18dc-4fb1-8453-6ffa866cc792.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then<img src="6-2340069\067e4016-8b26-4b94-878a-200259abbe24.jpg" />, i.e. problem (3) and (4) have a global solution (see for example [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29435-ref9">9</xref>]).</p><p>Using the Fourier transformation, Plancherel theorem and the Hausdorff-Young inequality, for the solution <img src="6-2340069\4c0f9959-e1e9-4f78-8e8a-5ad45d33cc32.jpg" /> we have the following inequalities (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29435-ref1">1</xref>]):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121598"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\4b607959-9b31-42f3-9033-a6408201dced.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121599"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\a17b365f-80dd-420b-a07f-0951c85dcc23.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121600"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\7f1cee3a-5806-4cb4-8791-f5b99a7f87ba.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121601"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\098af4bf-2015-4cb7-9f72-8d31a694828d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On the other hand, by virtue of condition 2˚</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121602"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\b30273de-6560-4194-8e6b-2ed67d50cbf6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121603"><label>. (17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\1edf46d1-77f7-46d1-b35f-1fde099580ab.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the Holder inequality, from (16) we have</p><p><img src="6-2340069\df827340-f217-4e40-9650-61d29124a08c.jpg" />.</p><p>By virtue of condition (7), (8) and the multiplicative inequality of Gagliardo-Nirenberg type, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121604"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\4e72c111-f01a-4c98-949e-4901734356d2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121605"><label>, (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29435-ref10">10</xref>]).              (19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\1960d928-ff58-43b1-b358-6e6373905dc3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Analogously from (17) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121606"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\4853f833-4824-4f51-9580-8e6227c024a5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121607"><label>. (21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\59fd82d9-54c4-4cf5-aff9-9861fc54329f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (12), (16) and (20) we have the following estimates</p><p><img src="6-2340069\571fb025-da82-4b46-a535-89f04fd41ece.jpg" />,(22)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121608"><label>. (23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\26dc653c-4e64-4b49-b13a-5c6c4b3bc2f4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It follows from (22) and (23) that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121609"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\b16952ab-9ff9-489b-8eea-4d19fff8fa3e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121610"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\d2d46689-64f1-46e5-ace8-f9b49a941773.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="6-2340069\0f359f05-2c5c-493a-a814-5daf7ea8fef5.jpg" /> and <img src="6-2340069\4e529212-fab1-4f96-a601-9a5f7f9d9cb4.jpg" /> are defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121611"><label>, (26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\37e3ccff-9f74-4a58-b0f4-5ba817df6405.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121612"><label>, (27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\b670e204-0f7a-44fc-8381-c2355b94f4f2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121613"><label>. (28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\c26e4f90-875d-4173-8f8f-33edf7b59009.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then, we have from (19), (21) and (28) that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121614"><label>, (29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\ec6e05ff-e2af-4a9a-8844-b41b6ca9f0a4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121615"><label>. (30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\c844ff54-bb03-4c58-8e6c-93d37b47004e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is clear from conditions (7), (8) and (29), (30) that</p><p><img src="6-2340069\02cee16a-8c61-4293-85cb-ca7abfef5dc2.jpg" />.</p><p>Allowing for (24), (25) we obtain that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121616"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\a641a071-b88f-488e-8e4d-e649955c15d3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus the a priori estimate (9) is satisfied, so<img src="6-2340069\b92fe1b3-3acd-4af0-a199-e7c731536a64.jpg" />. From (14) and (31) we yield the inequality (10).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Nonexistence of Global Solutions</title><p>Next let us discus the counterpart of the conditions (7) and (8). To this end we considered the Cauchy problem for the semi-linear hyperbolic inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121617"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\ae2cf83e-9741-4cb7-a0e7-359e1599437c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121618"><label>, (33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\0d4a1d9b-db14-43d1-bb06-580b5bfc691d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="6-2340069\f57fcdd6-6aa5-4b74-a072-bc33d853dd66.jpg" />.</p><p>The weak solution of inequality (32) with initial data (33) where</p><p><img src="6-2340069\b72d5c5b-e61c-4a7c-8504-6d12dad7bcbc.jpg" /></p><p>is called a function <img src="6-2340069\f3a9c755-352c-47a8-bc4f-e354b15c9ac3.jpg" /></p><p>which, and <img src="6-2340069\db33e22e-2f07-4385-8154-dc1bf18fdcfd.jpg" /> satisfies the following inequality:</p><p><img src="6-2340069\712cb50c-701b-4913-83db-c18e07acb848.jpg" /></p><p>for any function<img src="6-2340069\fbda15d4-2ff2-4f9a-a976-3d273c98bdd2.jpg" />, where</p><p><img src="6-2340069\907fc1fc-8a7c-4854-9d51-3a38ae02716d.jpg" />.</p><p>From Theorem 1 it follows that if <img src="6-2340069\7734269d-c9d7-4f30-8b64-4da898bb0b8c.jpg" /> and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121619"><label>, (34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\032a8988-d75b-4047-a0d8-46d81548c0d6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then there exists <img src="6-2340069\fdab0f6c-01d2-4da4-a87a-cde13a14abec.jpg" /> such that for any</p><p><img src="6-2340069\8e8cd65a-1dd2-4446-b6b6-8b6dbf172771.jpg" />, problems (30) and (31) have a unique solution</p><p><img src="6-2340069\00476feb-1c98-408e-b8af-0edbdf7e316d.jpg" />.</p><p>Theorem 2. Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121620"><label>, (35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\8d5a3ca5-91b5-4276-805f-b8cd8da94204.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121621"><label>. (36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\b1bdd9b7-a0fd-4db9-bbc2-3d949147f22e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then problems (32) and (33) have no nontrivial solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Proof of Theorem 2</title><p>We assume that <img src="6-2340069\d6123b7c-2052-4822-bed0-8fed46ed5bed.jpg" /> is a global solution of (32) and (33). Let <img src="6-2340069\8ddad10e-c0bd-4991-a52f-c811cebc770f.jpg" />be such that</p><p><img src="6-2340069\e8c97b5f-3034-4034-9cc3-8953c480f000.jpg" /></p><p>and, choose</p><p><img src="6-2340069\669983a9-47ad-46a1-8357-c84e14e0468b.jpg" />(see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29435-ref8">8</xref>]).</p><p>Taking such a <img src="6-2340069\de096bbe-72c6-48ee-99f2-40e6560fb667.jpg" /> as the test function in Definition 1, we get that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121622"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\c8308add-6c4c-4ea4-b8eb-9c418be2105a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The choose of <img src="6-2340069\35ec415c-d3d6-4ff5-81b8-0e72f12b91d0.jpg" /> implies that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121623"><label>. (38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\98d93ab2-645b-4c3c-99a3-528350af595d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Define<img src="6-2340069\27f6872e-8780-4bc5-a76b-bcdc90f0ff06.jpg" />. Again, by the choice of<img src="6-2340069\adae1a41-f40e-4059-907c-1158a84a40f1.jpg" />, it is easy to show that</p><p><img src="6-2340069\3c145b97-b312-4157-8368-f51400f77ad7.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-2340069\9376c286-ce9d-4ccf-9a96-7bc3727e7fed.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-2340069\afc109a8-f8c0-4a71-afd2-a73926ce91e2.jpg" /></p><p>Take scaled variables<img src="6-2340069\255cf0cf-a949-4a5b-837f-ba307bec9245.jpg" />, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121624"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\805317b3-be3d-4172-9fb1-3cb208cd5de0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121625"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\7b83d43b-7cf7-4e5c-ad87-81815a65e1b5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121626"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\bc959e4f-938e-4a98-939d-885c7c57c4c8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121627"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\c414108c-0abd-4535-901b-9161cd6181b1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121628"><label>, (43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\35ba3634-a5e6-4157-b435-08878b170801.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121629"><label>. (44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\af2734fa-4fbc-4531-80e4-4f3c8153eaf6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Letting <img src="6-2340069\fd141d28-e024-44c2-9417-7862316e03b6.jpg" /> in (39), owing to (35), (40), (41) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121630"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\e6b404a4-4249-4e74-8852-cc54a472ef6b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account condition (36), from (45) it follows that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121631"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\5bb14d87-0633-4929-ad2a-043973ef921d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further, by applying the Holder inequality, from (37) we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29435-formula121632"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-2340069\2844c209-3779-4aab-bb01-bf05aa57df22.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Letting <img src="6-2340069\79840a10-a800-47e4-b746-6a18397d7fec.jpg" /> in (47), owing to (45), we get</p><p><img src="6-2340069\575d4db5-fd6b-4051-9847-3132cf9b37aa.jpg" /></p><p>Finally, taking into condition (36), we have that</p><p><img src="6-2340069\6e71df44-482e-4b18-920b-764a05b9528b.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Acknowledgments</title><p>This work was supported by the Science Development Foundation under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Grant No EIF-2011-1(3)-82/18-1.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.29435-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. B. Aliev and A. A. Kazymov, “Global Weak Solutions of the Cauchy Problem for Semi-Linear Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equations,” Differential Equations, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2009, pp. 1-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. B. Aliev and B. H. Lichaei, “Existence and Non-Existence of Global Solutions of the Cauchy Problem for Higher Semi-Linear Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equations,” Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, Vol. 72, No. 7-8, 2010, pp. 3275-3288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. R. Ikehata, Y. Miataka and Y. Nakatake, “Decay Estimates of Solutions of Dissipative Wave Equations in R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt; with Lower Power Nonlinearities,” Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2004, pp. 365- 373.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Li and Y. Zhou, “Breakdown of Solutions u+u&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;=|u|&lt;sup&gt;1+α&lt;/sup&gt;,” Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1995, pp. 503-520. doi:10.3934/dcds.1995.1.503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. E. Segal, “Dispersion for Non-Linear Realistic Equations II,” Journal of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 4, No. 16, 1968, pp. 459-497.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. S. Zhag, “A Blow-Up Result for a Nonlinear Wave Equation with Damping,” The Critical Case, dans Comptesrendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Serie I, Vol. 333, 2001, pp. 109-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Todorova and B. Yordanov, “Critical Exponent for a Nonlinear Wave Equation with Damping,” dans Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Serie I, Vol. 330, 2000, pp. 557-562.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Mitidieri and S. I. Pokhozhaev, “A Priori Estimates and the Absence of Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Inequalities,” Steklov Mathematical Institute Seminar, Vol. 234, 2001, pp. 1-384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. B. Aliev, “Solvability in the Large of the Cauchy Problem for Quasilinear Equations of Hyperbolic Type,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol. 240, No. 2, 1978, pp. 249-252.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29435-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. V. Besov, V. P. Ilin and S. M. Nikolski, “Integral Representation of Functions and Embedding Theorem,” V.H. Wilson and Sons, Washington DC, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>