<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMNTA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9479</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijmnta.2013.21A010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJMNTA-29414</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Chaotic Fractals at the Root of Relativistic Quantum Physics and Cosmology
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>Marek-Crnjac</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>S. El Naschie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ji-Huan</surname><given-names>He</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Technical School Center of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile, Clothing Engineering Soochow University, Suzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>leila.marek@guest.arnes.si(.M)</email>;<email>Chaossf@aol.com(MSEN)</email>;<email>hejihuan@suda.edu.cn(JH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>03</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>78</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   At its most basic level physics starts with space-time topology and geometry. On the other hand topology’s and geometry’s simplest and most basic elements are random Cantor sets. It follows then that nonlinear dynamics i.e. deterministic chaos and fractal geometry is the best mathematical theory to apply to the problems of high energy particle physics and cosmology. In the present work we give a short survey of some recent achievements of applying nonlinear dynamics to notoriously difficult subjects such as quantum entanglement as well as the origin and true nature of dark energy, negative absolute temperature and the fractal meaning of the constancy of the speed of light. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hausdorff Dimension; Cantorian Space-Time; Golden Mean; Quantum Entanglement; Chaotic Fractals; Fractal Interpretation of Velocity of Light; Negative Kelvin Temperature</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The closing report of a notable Nobel conference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref1">1</xref>] held in Stockholm in 1984 contained the remarkable and at the time prophetic statement about the role which the science of nonlinear dynamics, chaos and fractals is expected to play in quantum physics. In fact it was stated in clear terms that nonlinear dynamics, chaos and fractals will “invade” the foundations of quantum physics [1,2]. In the present work we will give a short summary of some truly exciting developments confirming the Nobel conference prophecy not only in quantum physics but also in cosmology and specifically in resolving the mystery of the so called missing dark energy of the cosmos [3,4] as well as the fractal meaning of the constancy of the speed of light, negative gravity and negative absolute temperature in Kelvin scale [3-6].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Non-Commutative Geometry and Fractal Cantorian Space-Time</title><p>Besides M-theory, super strings and loop quantum gravity, A. Connes’ non-commutative geometry is generally accepted as a most promising theory for high energy particle physics and quantum gravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref7">7</xref>]. Vital for understanding this theory is to realize its close connection to chaotic fractals and nonlinear dynamics [7-13]. The simplest way to see that is to start from von Neumann-Connes’ dimensional function and then establish its equivalence to the bijection equation and the formalism of E-infinity Cantorian space-time and Penrose fractal tiling [9- 11]. The said dimensional function is given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref9">9</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78940"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\ae07b429-ff29-43d3-9f2f-59cc41dde3b4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="3-2340063\2af27d22-4050-41bd-8490-6fc72aa8d919.jpg" /> and<img src="3-2340063\8469f618-2834-43ea-aab9-7a5ec29bdb7e.jpg" />. Starting with the seed</p><p><img src="3-2340063\9689387a-0c4f-4083-9e66-a86a65b86006.jpg" />and <img src="3-2340063\70d05010-7f94-46e7-9762-734dc2e5da4d.jpg" /> then proceeding in a Fibonacci manner one finds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref9">9</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78941"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\ddf0d083-d536-4d80-9bb7-208121007637.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and so on.</p><p>Proceeding inductively one finds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78942"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\385968fa-5221-45b9-9196-05d5cc63f168.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where a, b represents the classical Fibonacci numbers and consequently moving in the direction of negative Menger-Urysohn dimension one finds [9-11]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78943"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\db3f657d-0aee-4126-927a-b6f023e92b56.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78944"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\0ca97ef2-d5b3-408c-b0aa-9d2bbc55ad3e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is just another way of writing the bijection formula of Einfinity Cantorian space-time [9-11]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78945"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\80532141-e440-451e-9d3a-2bd60a950395.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="3-2340063\bc4366f8-351b-438d-9796-857c752e4c03.jpg" /> is the Hausdorff dimension of a randomly constructed elementary triadic Cantor set, i.e. a chaotic version of the classical triadic set <img src="3-2340063\710bf3c5-00ee-435b-a0db-d3358d224b1d.jpg" /> [10,11]. We note the proximity of the magnitude of <img src="3-2340063\fde11847-a962-4bed-be66-7d0bf67d111f.jpg" /> to the golden mean <img src="3-2340063\db755696-afc2-48a4-9cbc-2ecfa9691595.jpg" /> [10,11]. Two important results can immediately be established, namely that [7,9-11] <img src="3-2340063\257b23e5-9019-44f7-84b5-9ccd897ac0df.jpg" />the Hausdorff dimension of the classical empty set [2,10,11] while <img src="3-2340063\9b6598b9-c200-4e5e-bfd1-5bc7e5331042.jpg" /> is the Hausdorff dimension of the truly empty set [2,10,11].</p><p>Consequently the distance between <img src="3-2340063\a609d425-3416-4ffa-86ac-2ffa4a08bc38.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="3-2340063\d02bbb48-fc93-41ef-900b-b4c594a284e5.jpg" />measures the degree of emptiness of an empty Cantor set (dust) [9-11].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Penrose Quasi-Periodic Fractal Tiling Universe</title><p>One of the most fundamental connections between noncommutative geometry and E-infinity theory is undoubtedly the famous Penrose quasi-periodic tiling universe with its golden mean proportionality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref9">9</xref>]. It is easy to see the connection to random Cantor sets and the compactified Klein modular curve when realizing the existence of an isomorphic length for this space equal to [9-11]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78946"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\6ff43049-18c3-416d-ba02-717087d3803b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="3-2340063\13b53f81-d313-4a22-98af-d37667e4a511.jpg" /> and <img src="3-2340063\33a763eb-eaba-48af-95cf-78f4676dc255.jpg" /> is an arbitrary radius. In other words, latest after moving a distance equal <img src="3-2340063\7aa7eef1-1cd2-4c4c-9025-06605cf3564b.jpg" /> the space reproduces itself exactly. This is clearly a universe which is its own multi-verse. We see here how the self-similarity and self-affinity of fractals can solve seemingly and superficial contradictory notions such as whether we live in a multi-verse or a universe.</p><p>From the above we see that in a fractal universe of the Penrose non-commutative type the problem resolves itself.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Quantum Entanglement as a Consequence of a Zero Measure Fractal Geometry</title><p>The totally incomprehensive riddle of spatial separation in quantum mechanics may easily be resolved using the property of zero Lebesque measure of all totally disjointed Cantor sets [12,13]. There is irrefutable theoretical and experimental proof for this E-infinity based proposal [12,13]. The story goes as follows: Using an ingenious Gedanken experiment L. Hardy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref14">14</xref>] was able to establish via Dirac’s orthodox quantum mechanical computation that the probability for quantum entanglement of two quantum particles is given by<img src="3-2340063\6d5545e6-755e-47aa-954c-3f18dcea6b84.jpg" />. On close examination by first Mermin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref15">15</xref>] and then the second author [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref12">12</xref>], it becomes evident that Hardy rounded off the result concealing its exact numerical magnitude namely that [12,13,15]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78947"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\a087e7d6-e624-4063-a107-0971336379ec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="3-2340063\cb198e92-b46b-4de6-89ba-8b8bfd6b447b.jpg" /> is the golden mean. The E-infinity interpretation stems from the general E-infinity formula for the probability of quantum entanglement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref13">13</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78948"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\40182a5f-b1a1-4cea-ad8b-8673fd6e6591.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where n is the number of quantum particles and <img src="3-2340063\ca0d733c-e7ad-4c57-91d7-8b9363e6c2a2.jpg" /> is the inverse of the Hausdorff dimension of the E-infinity fractal space-time core [10,11]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78949"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\82062757-17bd-44db-b386-23fbeb347c8b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For two particles this means</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78950"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\0db62d7c-bd15-4eac-b86b-07a58a72ac4d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Seen that way quantum entanglement can be understood as a natural consequence of the zero length (i.e. zero measure) of a Cantor set and the problem of spatial separation in quantum mechanics is swept away. In a zero measure space-time manifold there is simply no meaning for spatial separation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref13">13</xref>]. This incredible result of Hardy-Mermin and El Naschie was experimentally confirmed using various accurate methods in many international laboratories [13-15].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. The Missing Energy of the Universe</title><p>At present the problem, of dark energy or the missing energy in the universe, constitutes the most challenging problem in physics and cosmology alike [3,5,6]. Accurate measurement has shown that only 4.5% of the total energy thought to be contained in the universe is detectable [3,5]. The simple conclusion for these results which were awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics is that either Einstein’s equation contains some error or 95.5% of the energy in the universe is due to mysterious dark matter and dark energy which cannot be detected with any known methods [3,5,6]. The nonlinear-dynamical fractal resolution of this problem however is unbelievably simple, more than one could imagine [3,5]. The rationale behind this is as follows: If space-time itself is a real Cantorian fractal then it resembles an unimaginably large cotton candy [5,7,11,13]. The majority of this cosmic cotton candy is naturally voids containing nothing, not even space or time. Consequently Einstein’s famous equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref5">5</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78951"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\319ac09d-e9ef-44ba-93fc-924f78f3fea6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>must be modified to take all these fractal voids into consideration. This can be done in various equivalent ways. The simplest is to take bosonic strings compactified “dark” dimensions into account in the form of a Weyl-Nottale scaling factor. Since bosonic string space has 26 dimensions and Einstein’s relativity is only 4 dimensional then the “dark” dimensions are 26 – 4 = 22 and our scaling factor must be [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref5">5</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78952"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\f1373d2b-6f19-4c27-9c43-8310d30bd7ec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Consequently the revised E is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78953"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\259293fe-10f5-4383-965c-787fed7893cb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Noting that<img src="3-2340063\9beb0c4c-eae2-486e-90be-515f2d47cce9.jpg" />, we see that the new E<sub>QR</sub> accurately accounts for the cosmological measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Another way to come to the same conclusion is to reason that from high energy particle physics point of view <img src="3-2340063\fc9073d2-4f4c-42d2-a265-014a38f37373.jpg" /><sup> </sup>is based on the existence of one messenger particle, namely the photon <img src="3-2340063\ad9c465b-3a0a-417c-9c35-1d6bb60569e1.jpg" /> However this was in 1905 when Einstein conceived his theory. In the meantime we know that we have 12 messenger photon-like particles given by the Lie symmetry groups of the standard model of particle physics [10,11]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78954"><label>. (15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\74ce8622-a619-4892-aef0-25bd9c785c20.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Consequently by inserting <img src="3-2340063\40771582-bed6-4222-bf82-9268b17ae656.jpg" /> in Newton’s kinetic energy and letting <img src="3-2340063\e97aa15e-88a5-4dd1-8037-043325b9de19.jpg" /> one finds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78955"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\12be0153-31ad-4252-8d82-63edd8f80de7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>exactly as in the first derivation, namely Equation (14).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Unifying Relativity and Quantum Theory via Zero Measure Fractals</title><p>The previous derivations of the revised Einstein equation</p><p><img src="3-2340063\9c81d049-2581-43b2-ac6c-3e6fc0f563ae.jpg" />were only very accurate approximations. However an exact derivation can be obtained when taking the exact fractal nature of quantum entanglement in deriving E<sub>QR</sub>. Again this could be done in several equivalent ways. Here we give two methods only. The first is based upon formal analogy between the E-formula of the theory of varying speeds of light (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [16,17]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78956"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\7e99819c-3a35-4dc9-b038-6ad65ea7e7f4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the Cantor set unit interval physics of Ultimate L and F and Taiji-El Naschie theory [18,19] (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Here<img src="3-2340063\99d5d1f2-a85b-4f69-a8c6-682e92154139.jpg" /> denotes the Planck energy [15,16]. Now within Taiji-El Naschie theory <img src="3-2340063\05ff3c3a-e06a-4dcf-88fc-31ae08ca37e8.jpg" /> is simply equal to <img src="3-2340063\7fdde9c8-bb39-43b0-9e73-ec135c2b0565.jpg" /> <img src="3-2340063\b6fd5d01-b0fe-4711-96fa-c7e7fc1645be.jpg" /> while the devisor m is the five dimensionality of Kaluza-Klein and similarly the devisor c is Sigalotti’s critical speed [20-22]<img src="3-2340063\7b3a49f7-1af5-4dc4-b5f3-e281111cefad.jpg" />. Inserting in E one finds (see Figures 1-3)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78957"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\d0030ebe-2d1f-4207-a16a-d244cccb99c1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In other words the exact <img src="3-2340063\dd68ca16-de4b-4ca5-900c-54a9571b964b.jpg" /> of quantum relativity is equal Einstein<img src="3-2340063\16bac895-d58f-4a6d-94cf-e354ef34e1bc.jpg" /> multiplied with half of Hardy’s <img src="3-2340063\82741ea8-8b13-4065-aa44-b627613620ab.jpg" /> [12-15]. That means</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78958"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\37a0d073-9484-4e14-8258-8b9e7d1109b3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Seen that way the reduction of E from the 100% of Einstein’s theory to the 4.5% of the exact quantum relativity theory is due to quantum entanglement at the Hubble cosmic distances (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) which could be explained rationally via the zero measure of fractal Cantorian geometry [10-13]. The second method we will use to derive the same previous formula is to go back to relativistic boost and then connect it to the random Cantor sets topology. We start with the three well documented relativistic effects namely time dilation, shortening of spatial extension and mass increase at <img src="3-2340063\d1d1c4a8-c604-418a-bac1-b0ebb3ff1bd9.jpg" />That means [5, 22]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78959"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\d7063c12-aade-4f45-95c0-144dd70f1757.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="3-2340063\40d3e106-66f9-4598-a737-b30f7da3a19d.jpg" /> is a boost which needs not be specified at this point. Setting in Newton’s kinetic energy one finds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref5">5</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78960"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\1f6e9f00-3a26-45f9-9cec-7a187a4c2802.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking <img src="3-2340063\c5b922db-31fc-458d-b083-6f7bdc352a1d.jpg" /> to be Sigalotti’s critical value <img src="3-2340063\d813578b-204b-4cb2-a383-1e0bff9128b8.jpg" /> [20, 21] one finds the same previous result</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78961"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\8d07017a-c054-4be2-bd89-4bad8676554e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Discussion and Prospects</title><p>For the last thirty years or so nonlinear dynamics became an indispensible tool for countless branches of engineering and applied sciences as well as mathematics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref13">13</xref>]. By comparison high energy and quantum physics was slow to utilize the tremendous possibilities offered by deterministic chaos and fractal geometry [2,10,11,13]. The situation changed radically in the last five years or so. In particular the success of resolving fundamental problems such as the mystery of dark energy and quantum entanglement is paving the way towards a reappraisal of many fundamental problems in theoretical physics and cosmology from the point of view of nonlinear dynamics, chaos and fractals [1,2,11,13]. It is an accurate statement to claim that the word Notion and the concept of self-similarity and self-affinity became indispensable tools of exact science only after the rise to prominence of non-linear dynamics, chaos and fractals some three decades ago [1, 2]. This is what made it possible to apply global analysis in conjunction with fractal geometry in relativistic quantum cosmology and discover that Newton’s kinetic energy <img src="3-2340063\b079b466-b557-436e-ab2e-6f00b6530fdb.jpg" /> as well as Einstein’s relativistic formula <img src="3-2340063\c4af6470-6c0e-4209-83e9-1e5f8a32e19c.jpg" />and the new quantum relativistic energymasse equivalence equation E<sub>QR</sub>; <img src="3-2340063\77c1cdfa-f537-4ab0-b66c-336e5a6e5f7a.jpg" />are merely self-similar scaling of each other in the sense of modern nonlinear dynamical theories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref22">22</xref>]. We could go even several steps further and realize that a fractal form of Legendre transformation leads us to recognize that the</p><p>energy formula for dark energy is given directly by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78962"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\5de10cff-6914-4082-8f19-51c9a2ea7ff5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This obviously is the complementary energy of the ordinary energy</p><p><img src="3-2340063\27af3a5e-7752-49f2-9ec6-9af85b276c27.jpg" />&#160;&#160;&#160; &#160;(24) Adding both expressions we find that (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78963"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\91e8f087-d284-4da6-85d9-9e8a60cd54f4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We draw here attention to the T-duality (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) and the unit interval physics behind this incredibly simple and elegant relations reconciling classical physics with relativity and quantum theory. It is remarkable that the same physics behind the very large meets at “infinity” with physics of the extremely small unifying high energy with cosmology (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) and all via the magnificent concept and mathematics of renormalization.</p><p>In turn this mathematics is nothing more than taming all singularities using fractal self-similarity [1,2].</p><p>This conclusion has momentous ramifications going as far as showing the existence of negative gravity (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) as well as explaining the fractal rationale behind the mystery of the constancy of the speed of light (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) and negative absolute temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref4">4</xref>] (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Conclusion</title><p>Nonlinear dynamics, chaos and fractals have enriched science and gave theoreticians meantime various new indispensable mathematical tools such as self-similarity, average symmetry and fuzzy group theories [2,11]. High energy physics was relatively late in utilizing these new methods, but things have flourished in the last five years thanks to the dedicated work of various schools which applied nonlinear dynamics to particle physics and cosmology [1,8,9,12]. We were able to reason that dark energy is related to compactified and fractal extra-dimensions zero and empty sets which employ fractals and Cantorian sets [5,22]. That way we were in a position to derive a fundamental quantum relativity equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78964"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\9fd82b5e-ce10-4ca4-a790-0d2bbd0cfb3a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and a second complementary equation (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.29414-formula78965"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-2340063\ade0db0a-32fd-4716-b363-4a8769ec5e12.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The sum of both equations is exactly equal to Einstein’s famous equation which doesn’t distinguish between ordinary energy and dark energy i.e. <img src="3-2340063\c875df9e-a569-4e47-ab76-edb9703ca995.jpg" />It is important to notice that the ratio of E(Dark) to E(Ordinary) is exactly equal to</p><p><img src="3-2340063\fdcacda4-e4a5-4d69-bd94-21708ef06be5.jpg" />.</p><p>In other words this is the 26 + k of transfinite bosonic string theory minus the five dimensions of Kaluza-Klein theory. Seen that way dark energy is related to the compactified section of space-time of bosonic strings which represents negative curvature and thus negative energy and negative gravity (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) leading to the observed acceleration of the universe. That way nonlinear dynamics, deterministic chaos theory and Cantorian fractals seem to have succeeded in solving yet another major mystery in current modern cosmology [3,5,6]. It is consequently reasonable to accept that further intensive future research using modern nonlinear dynamics and Ultimate L set theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29414-ref18">18</xref>] will give a final resolution to</p><p>the deep problems of the true meaning of time, gravity and the constancy of the speed of light which we outlined here in Figures 3, 4, 6 and 7. In addition we tackled negative absolute temperature and it’s dual relation to negative dimensions and relevance to negative gravity and dark energy [4,23] (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.29414-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. P. Gollub and P. C. Hohenberg, “Summary Session,” Physica Scripta, 1985, pp. 209-216. 
doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1985/T9/035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. El Naschie, “Elementary Prerequisites for E-Infinity,” Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 579-605. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, “Dark Energy: Theory and Observations,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J.-P. Hsu and L. Hsu, “A Broader View of Relativity,” 2nd Edition, World Scientific, Singapore City, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. El Naschie and L. Marek-Crnjac, “Deriving the Exact Percentage of Dark Energy Using a Transfinite Version of Nottale’s Scale Relativity,” International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2012, pp. 118-124. doi:10.4236/ijmnta.2012.14018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of Dark Energy,” 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Ord, M. S. El Naschie and J. H. He, “Fractal Space-Time and Non-Commutative Geometry in High Energy Physics,” A New Journal by Asian Academic Publishing Ltd., Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Connes, “Non-Commutative Geometry,” Academic Press, San Diego, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Marek-Crnjac, “The Hausdorff Dimension of the Penrose Universe,” Physics Research International, Vol. 2011, 2011, Article ID: 874302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. El Naschie, “A Review of E-Infinity and the Mass Spectrum of High Energy Particle Physics,” Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2004, pp. 209-236. 
doi:10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00278-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. El Naschie, “The Theory of Cantorian Space-Time and High Energy Particle Physics,” (An Informal Review), Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2009, pp. 2635-2646. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2008.09.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. He, L. Marek-Crnjac, M. A. Helal, S. I. Nada and O. E. R?ssler, “Quantum Golden Mean Entanglement Test as the Signature of the Fractality of Micro Space-Time,” Nonlinear Scientific Letter B, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2011, pp. 45-50. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. El Naschie, “Quantum Entanglement as a Consequence of a Cantorian Micro Space-Time Geometry,” Journal of Quantum Information Science, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2011, pp. 50-53. doi:10.4236/jqis.2011.12007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Hardy, “Non-Locality of Two Particles without Inequalities for Almost All Entangled States,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 71, No. 11, 1993, pp. 1665-1668. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Mermin, “Quantum Mysteries Refined,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 62, No. 10, 1994, pp. 880-887. 
doi:10.1119/1.17733</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Mageuijo and L. Smolin, “Lorentz Invariance with an Invariant Energy Scale,” 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Mageuijo, “Faster than the Speed of Light,” William Heinemann, London, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. El Naschie, “A Unified Newtonian-Relativistic Quantum Resolution of the Supposedly Missing Dark Energy of the Cosmos and the Constancy of the Speed of Light,” International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2013, pp. 43-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Elwes, “Ultimate L,” The New Scientist, Vol. 211, No. 2823, 2011, pp. 30-33.  
doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(11)61838-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Hendi and M. Zadeh, “Special Relativity and the Golden Mean,” Journal of Theoretic Physics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp. 37-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Wit and J. McClure, “Statistics for Microarrays: Design, Analysis, and Inference,” 5th Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2004. doi:10.1002/0470011084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Sigalotti and A. Mejias, “The Golden Mean in Special Relativity,” Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 521-524. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29414-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Aron, “Atoms beyond Absolute Zero,” New Scientist, Vol. 12, No. 2899, 2013, p. 12.  
doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(13)60081-0</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>