<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2013.53A036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-29229</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Freshwater Influx on Phytoplankton in the Mandovi Estuary (Goa, India) during Monsoon Season: Chemotaxonomy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ushma</surname><given-names>G. Parab</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>G. Prabhu Matondkar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Helga</surname><given-names>do R. Gomes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joaquim</surname><given-names>I. Goes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University, New York, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>sgpm@nio.org, psushma@nio.org(UGP)</email>;<email>helga@ldeo.columbia.edu(HDRG)</email>;<email>jig@ldeo.columbia.edu(JIG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>349</fpage><lpage>361</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>2,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   The Mandovi estuary is a prominent water body that runs along the west coast ofIndia. It forms an estuarine network with the adjacent Zuari estuary, connected via the Cumbharjua canal. The physico-chemical conditions seen in the Mandovi estuary are influenced by two factors
   :
    the fresh water runoff during the monsoon season (June-September) and the tidal influx of coastal seawater during the summer (October to May) season. However, the effects of monsoon related changes on the phytoplankton of the Mandovi estuary are not yet fully understood. An attempt to understand the same has been made here by applying the process of daily sampling at a fixed station throughout the monsoon season. It was noticed that the onset of the monsoon is responsible for an increase in nitrate levels upto 26 μM from &lt;1 μM during pre-monsoon and enhancement of chlorophyll a (chl a) as high as 14 μg&#183;L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> during 
   the 
   same period. The phytoplankton population was observed through both chemotaxonomy and microscopy and was found to be composed mainly of diatoms. CHEMTAX analysis further uncover
   s
    the presence of several other groups of phytoplankton, the presence of which is yet to be reported in 
   many
    other tropical estuar
   ies
   . 
   It
    include
   s
    chrysophytes, cyanobacteria, prasinophytes, prymne
   siophytes and chlorophytes. The appearance of phytoplankton groups at various stages of the monsoon w
   as
    recorded, and this data is discussed in relation to environmental changes in the Mandovi estuary during the monsoon season. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Phytoplankton; Pigment Analysis; Monsoon; Freshwater Runoff; CHEMTAX</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Estuaries are complex ecosystems which have been proven to be interesting areas of study due to their constantly changing physico-chemical environments. Estuaries on the west coast of India are unique in both their physical and biogeochemical features, due to intense freshwater flux during the monsoon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref1">1</xref>]. The Mandovi estuary is located between 15˚25'N to 15˚31'N and 73˚45' to 73˚59'E along the west coast of India and is well mixed throughout the year with the exception of the monsoon months during which time vertical stratification appears [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref2">2</xref>]. The Mandovi estuary receives an annual rainfall of 250 - 300 cm&#183;year<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> during the southwest monsoon (June-September) and less than 10 cm&#183;year<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> during the rest of the year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref3">3</xref>]. During the southwest monsoon (SWM), the Mandovi estuary receives heavy freshwater discharge which results in constant alteration in the salinity. Thus the salinity varies from 0 to 22 PSU during the months from June to September [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref4">4</xref>]. These variations also bring changes in water turbidity and hence availability of solar radiation during the monsoon.</p><p>A unique feature of the Mandovi River is the phenomenal tides that it is subject to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref5">5</xref>]. As a consequence, the Mandovi estuary experiences large influxes of seawater during the non-monsoon months which not only has a significant impact on its salinity [5,6] but also on its nutrient concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref7">7</xref>]. Earlier it was noticed that the distribution and abundance of phytoplankton were strongly regulated by both salinity and nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref8">8</xref>]. As an alternative and complement to microscopic examination, the accessory pigments estimated by High Performance Liquid-Chromatography (HPLC) provide accurate classspecific differentiation of the phytoplankton groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref9">9</xref>]. This approach has greatly advanced our understanding of phytoplankton pigment composition and functionality in response to ecosystem changes in the southeastern US estuaries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref10">10</xref>], the Nervious estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref11">11</xref>], the Tagus estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref12">12</xref>] and the Schelde estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref13">13</xref>], However, this aspect of research is yet to be conducted in Indian estuaries.</p><p>The aim of our study was to investigate the response of the phytoplankton community of the Mandovi estuary to monsoonal forcing using HPLC technique and to compare it through microscopy. To the best of our knowledge our study represents the first detailed study of the phytoplankton community combined with a pigments signature in a tropical monsoon-influenced estuary. Our results also provide a further understanding of the dynamics of phytoplankton in neritic environments.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>A 187-day sampling regime was undertaken in the Mandovi estuary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Though partially landlocked, this estuary is exposed to constant flushing and flooding by semidiurnal tides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref1">1</xref>]. Water samples were collected daily at 11.0 hrs from the station denoted as A in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. This site was chosen not only because of its easy access to the coastal research vessel CRV Sagar Shukti, which was anchored at the site during the entire study period, but also on account of the large salinity range (0 to 22 PSU) which the site experiences following the onset of the monsoon season (Shetye et al. 2007). The 187-day study period has been partitioned into four phases based on the rainfall that St. A received during that year: the pre-monsoon (PreM; 23<sup>rd</sup> May-27<sup>th</sup> May 2007, Julian Days (JD) 143 - 147), intermonsoon (InterM; 28<sup>th</sup> May-23<sup>rd</sup> June 2007, JDs 148 - 174), monsoon (MoN; 24<sup>th</sup> June to 29<sup>th</sup> Sep 2007, JDs 175 - 272) and postmonsoon (PostM; 30<sup>th</sup> Sept-30<sup>th</sup> Nov JDs 273 - 334) (Pednekar et al., 2011).</p><p>Sampling was restricted to the surface and the water was collected using 5 L Niskin sampling bottles, mounted</p><p>on a Sea Bird Electronics Conductivity Temperature Density (CTD) Rosette. Immediately after collection, the water in the Niskin sampler was carefully drained into acid-washed carboys. Samples were then immediately transported under cold and dark conditions for analysis to the laboratory approximately 10 km away where they were carefully sub-sampled in duplicate for phytoplankton counts by microscopy, HPLC analysis and nitrate analysis. Earlier study revealed the nitrate as important variable whereas other nutrients (phosphate, silicate) do not affect the estuarine ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Hydrography</title><p>Rainfall data for the Mandovi estuary was obtained from the India Meteorological Department while CTD (sea bird) records were used for temperature-salinity purposes. Salinity was confirmed with a Salinometer (Atago S/ Mill<sup>&#174;</sup>, Japan, Salinity range 0 - 100 PSU) while the Nitrate was analysed using the method outlined in Strickland and Parsons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Phytoplankton Identification and Enumeration by Microscopy</title><p>Samples for total cell counts of phytoplankton and identification by microscopy were collected in duplicate in 500 ml plastic bottles. Samples were then carefully fixed with a few drops of Lugol’s iodine, preserved with 3% buffered formaldehyde and then stored under dark and cool conditions until the time of analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref16">16</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. HPLC Pigment Analysis</title><p>The Seawater samples (1 litre) were filtered through GF/F filters and analyzed by HPLC [9,17]. Prior to the HPLC analysis, the filters were immersed in 90% acetone, extracted under cold and dark conditions overnight, sonicated and finally filtered through 0.2 &#181;m, 13 mm PTFE filters to rid the sample of particulate debris. Aliquots of 1 ml of the pigment extract were then mixed with 0.3 ml of distilled water in a 2 ml amber vial and allowed to equilibrate for 5 minutes prior to injection into an HPLC (Agilent<sup>&#174;</sup> 1100 series) equipped with a diode array detector. Pigments were separated in a C-18 reverse-phase column using the eluent gradient program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref9">9</xref>] as adapted by Bidigare and Charles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref17">17</xref>] as detailed in Parab, et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref16">16</xref>]. Chlorophyll, carotenoids and xanthophylls were detected by their absorbance peaks at 436 nm and identified by comparison with the retention times of standard pigments obtained from DHI<sup>&#174;</sup> Water and Environment, Denmark. The following abbreviations are used for the pigments: chlorophyll a (chl a), chlorophyll c2 (chl c2), fucoxanthin (fuco), diadinoxanthin (diad), peridinin (peri), zeaxanthin (zea), alloxanthin (allo), prasinoxanthin (pras), 19’hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin (19’hex), 19’butanoyloxyfucoxanthin (19’but), lutein (lut), neoxanthin (neo) and myxoxanthophyll (myxo).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Chemotaxonomic Analyses of Phytoplankton</title><p>The Algal class abundance was determined from HPLC algal pigment measurements using CHEMTAX, a factor analysis programme, which estimates the contribution of each specified phytoplankton pigment class to the total chl a concentration in a water sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out using Statistical package version 6.0. (Statsoft, Oklahoma USA). The first principal component Factor 1 accounts for greater variability and each succeeding factor explains the remaining variability possible in the data set. The ordination results for the first two most important factors (Factor 1 and Factor 2) were retained. The average tide for one week cycle is compared with biological data to normalize daily tide variability at a fixed time.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physico-Chemical Conditions of the Estuary</title><p>During PreM season (JD 143) corresponding with the first rain showers the salinity was 37 &#177; 2. The intense rain received during JDs 148 - 272 brought about drastic changes in the salinity of the region under study. Initially salinity was slowly lowered from 0 - 20 during JDs 175 - 272. At the end of the MoN salinity showed upwards trend and the PostM season (JDs 273 - 334) was marked by the presence of moderate salinity at the study site (26 &#177; 7). These variations in salinity occurring with rainfall are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, where salinity followed the pattern of the rain received.</p><p>Land runoff during the MoN brought nitrate into the estuary, thus increasing its concentration up to 26 &#181;M. The progression of the monsoon witnessed the addition and dilution of nitrate due to the freshwater runoff this in turn was also responsible for the moderately high nitrate levels (in the range of 10 - 15 &#181;M) throughout the monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The salinity and temperature data recorded by CTD during daily sampling is compiled. Temperature was not important factor since this is a shallow part of estuary near to river mouth. However stratification was due to the freshwater cap formed during active monsoon. During the PreM, the temperature of the water column was around 31˚C while its salinity was around 36. As the monsoon progressed the temperature was lowered to 26˚C and salinity nearly zero with stratified water column. The PostM season was marked by 29˚C water temr</p><p>perature and around 20 salinity with well mixed water column (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Microscopic Study</title><p>Phytoplankton cell numbers were found to be highest at the beginning of the monsoon, in the range of (2 - 6.5) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> cells·L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. During the InterM period high counts of the filamentous cyanobacteria Trichodesmium erythraeum and Trichodesmium thiebautii ranging from 0.001 - 1.286 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> filaments·L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> were recorded in the Mandovi estuary. During the MoN the population of the phytoplankton increased time to time due to a break in the monsoonal rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). An increase of at least six fold was recorded in phytoplankton numbers during the MoN while a three fold increase was recorded during the PostM compared to low values during intense monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Monsoon pattern of total phytoplankton counts was more similar to diatom counts where as</p><p>PostM matched with dinoflagellates counts (JDs 285, 303 and 350). This increase during MoN was associated with blooms of the diatom Skeletonema costatum where its cells varied from (2 - 6)&#215; 10<sup>4</sup> cells&#183;L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. In case of the PostM, the counts of the dinoflagellate Scrippsiella trochoidea were found to be in the range of (1 - 3)&#215; 10<sup>4</sup> cells·L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> altering the phytoplankton pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Phytoplankton Pigments and CHEMTAX Study</title><p>Chlorophyll a which is the indicator of phytoplankton biomass is higher during InterM (5.76 &#177; 1 &#181;g&#183;L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) compared to other seasons which varied from 1.95 - 2.96 &#181;g&#183;L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. Similarly, chl b, chl c2, fuco and peri were also high during InterM period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Other pigments like pras, allo, lut, myxo, 19’ but and 19’ hex were low during entire study period. Group level information on phytoplankton derived from chemtax study using pigment estimates is presented as the chl a equivalent to a particular phytoplankton group. At the beginning of the monsoon the increase in the chl a was mainly due to diatom growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), followed by cryptophytes. At the end of the MoN, an increase in the dinoflagellate population was recorded. Three prominent peaks of the prymnesiophytes were recorded during a break in the MoN where salinity was on the rise. The PostM season was also marked by an increase in the population of picocyanobacteria and prasinophytes during intermittent showers of the post-monsoon rain. It was also observed that all six groups of phytoplankton recorded by CHEMTAX study appeared as mixed populations just after the first showers of the MoN during JDs 148 - 174 where salinity and nitrate both were high.</p><p>The final output ratio matrices for InterM, MoN and PostM are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The relative contribution of pigment groups to Chl a is illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The mean percentage of diatoms by CHEMTAX was high during InterM (63%) and PostM (63%) and low in the PreM (42 %; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Dinoflagellates were high in the PostM (10%), cryptophytes in the MoN (22%), prymnesiophytes in the InterM (1%) whereas cyanobacteria and prasinophytes during PreM (40% and 6% respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Comparison of Microscopy and CHEMTAX Study</title><p>Out of the six groups of phytoplankton recorded by</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Phytoplankton average pigments and salinity during monsoon study in the Mandovi estuary.</p><p><img src="5-9401698\658c0cd0-b888-4648-a505-9fc77f62df8a.jpg" /></p><p>NC indicates samples not collected.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Output ratios for each season as calculated by CHEMTAX.</p><p><img src="5-9401698\e107264b-4e3a-43a2-b0ea-fa38e21da151.jpg" /></p><p>CHEMTAX study, only the diatoms and the dinoflagellates were examined by the microscopy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Further it was noticed that the diatom being major group was in agreement with the CHEMTAX derived diatom data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This was also observed during bloom of the Skeletonema costatum, during intermittent break in the rain and increase in the salinity.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Effect of Environmental Variables on the Phytoplankton Population</title><p>To know whether the variations in the hydrography, and phytoplankton biomass by microscopy and HPLC due to the tidal advection, the running 14 days mean was taken (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). It was found that the salinity varied from 2.86 - 36 (ave. 15 &#177; 11), chl a varied from 1.23 - 6.41</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Mean (plus the standard deviations) contribution of phytoplankton classes to chlorophyll a biomass (expressed in percentage) calculated by CHEMTAX.</p><p>&#181;g·L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (ave. 2.86 &#177; 1.48), total phytoplankton density ranged from 0.52 - 3.21 cell nos. &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (1.42 &#177; 0.88), cell biovolume was 2e+017 - 7e+018 m<sup>3</sup>·L<sup>−1</sup> (1e+018 &#177; 2e+018), fuco was 0.18 - 1.74 &#181;g·L<sup>−1</sup> (0.63 &#177; 0.43), diatoms by microscopy ranged from 0.49 - 3.13 cell nos. &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> L<sup>−1</sup> (1.20 &#177; 0.88), diatoms by CHEMTAX was 0.24 - 2.21 &#181;g·L<sup>−1</sup> (0.79 &#177; 0.56) and fuco:chl a ratio was 0.14 - 0.31 (0.22 &#177; 0.05).</p><p>To discriminate patterns of variation in the phytoplankton groups by CHEMTAX during different seasons, PCA analysis was undertaken using all phytoplankton groups derived by CHEMTAX and environmental variables (salinity, temperature, rainfall and nitrate) as input variables. During InterM the first two factors, Factors 1 and 2, explained 34.66% and 17.84%; MoN, 45.71% and 19.26% and PostM 40.78% and 27.65% respectively, of the total variation in the phytoplankton groups by CHEMTAX (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)). During InterM, diatoms by CHEMTAX as well as microscopy showed a positive correlation with rainfall and nitrate, while temperature was negatively correlated with these groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)). Rainfall and nitrate were negatively correlated with all phytoplankton groups during MoN while salinity was positively correlated with diatoms, cryptophytes and cyanobacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). In PostM, rainfall and nitrate were negatively correlated with most of the phytoplankton groups except for chlorophytes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Marine ecosystems are sensitive to physical factors like stratification, solar input and temperature and chemical factors like nutrients, salinity and oxygen content of the water mass. In an estuarine ecosystem, in addition to these factors, freshwater runs off during the MoN also to be taken into consideration. The land runoff during the monsoon transports fertilizers and organic detritus from surrounding agricultural areas, which in turn alter the light penetration due to an increase in the turbidity and resuspension of the bottom sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref7">7</xref>]. During 2007, the monsoon was well spread and the salinity changes in the Mandovi estuary matched the rainfall pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). It is interesting to note that, during the monsoon study for 10 - 12 times salinity reached to 0 PSU indicating that a total flushing of the estuarine water was taking place, thereby making the estuary a freshwater system. From temperature and salinity data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) it appears that Mandovi estuary was stratified during the entire MoN whereas well mixed during PreM and PostM season. Mandovi estuary have identified as partial-stratified estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>During the peak of the MoN nitrate was as high as 26 &#181;M and remained more than 5 &#181;M throughout the monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Our nitrate value was higher than the earlier reports from Mandovi estuary which was 6 - 11 &#181;M [20,21]. The increase in nitrate in the estuary over the years is appreciable, that may be due to agricultural runoff during the monsoons and process of eutrophication due to industrialization of catchment area and overuse of river water for ore transport, drinking and agriculture usage.</p><p>The impact of the monsoon on the phytoplankton population was recorded in terms of the phytoplankton (total cell numbers and chlorophyll a) and percentage of the phytoplankton groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref19">19</xref>]. The phytoplankton counts during the MoN were 3.63 &#177; 0.86 nos. &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> which was higher than the PostM (0.98 &#177; 0.962 nos. &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and close to the PreM (3.42 &#177; 0.66 nos. &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) period. The earlier reports on phytoplankton counts and chl a concentration of Mandovi estuary during the MoN was much lower [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref22">22</xref>] as compared to the rest of the year. Our data shows that the phytoplankton biomass is negatively affected during monsoon and not severely affected as it was reported earlier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref22">22</xref>]. On the contrary, the diversity of phytoplankton was more during monsoon compared to other seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>In the backwaters of Cochin (India), with a similar estuarine system along the west coast of India, the phytoplankton biomass was found to be greater during the peak monsoon season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref23">23</xref>]. However, blooms of Ceratium furca and Nitzschia closterium was observed during the PostM in the Mandovi estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref22">22</xref>]. The fact that during the PostM dinoflagellate population is more important part of the succession of the phytoplankton recorded in the Mandovi estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>The chlorophyll a distribution pattern during the monsoon season in the estuary matches with the salinity pattern and hence rain. These peaks were composed of blooms of diatoms (monsoon) and dinoflagellates (postmonsoon). Further it was noticed that Skeletonema costatum was the most successful diatom species during the monsoon while the dinoflagellate Scrippsiella trochoidea was during MoN and PostM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). During monsoon stratification has supported diatom growth as long as nitrate level was high. At the end of the monsoon stratification persist but low nitrate only supported dinoflagellates. The large amount of biomass produced by Skeletonema costatum is exported to nearby coastal waters where it is recycled further, enrichment source of coastal waters during monsoon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref16">16</xref>]. The west coast of Goa is rich in fishery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref24">24</xref>] and this river plays an important role by export of organic matter during MoN and PostM seasons.</p><p>The phytoplankton counts data was in agreement with chl a (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The relationship between chl a and total phytoplankton by microscopy is significant (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.6; n = 187), where microplankton is the important size group of the phytoplankton in the Mandovi estuary. The effect of the monsoon runoff on both diatom and dinoflagellate populations has been recently published (Pednekar et al., 2011). We have used this data with pigment data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> the indicative pigments like fucoxanthin (for diatom) and peridinin (for dinoflagellates) reflects on taxonomic data. Thus, pigment signatures are reliable tool for understanding impact of environmental changes on phytoplankton population in the tropical estuaries like Mandovi estuary.</p><p>Although cryptophytes, chlorophytes, prasinophytes and cyanobacteria are important components of the Mandovi estuary the pattern of the phytoplankton community can be understood by study of the diatom and the dinoflagellate population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The fuco:chl a ratio remained same throughout the monsoon season (0.43). Similar data is also reported in the temperate estuarine region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref25">25</xref>]. As such fucoxanthin showed a strong correlation with chl a during the study (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.8; n = 187). The ratio chl b:chl a during our study varied from 0.089 to 0.579 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value was found during the InterM. The chl b has been reported in the small size-phytoplankton in the estuarine waters [11,26]. A high concentration of chl b in the eastern English channel in winter although no green algae were detected by light microscopy suggesting these algae were in picoplankton fraction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref27">27</xref>]. In the Nervion river estuary the authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref28">28</xref>] reported Micromonas pusilla as dominant picoplankton. Prasinophytes have also been found to be the dominant green algae in other estuarine areas [29-31]. The ratio of chl b:chl a is higher in prasinophytes than in chlorophytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref32">32</xref>], reaching values upto 0.8 in Micromonas pusilla [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref33">33</xref>]. The chl b:chl a ratio in the Mandovi estuary was partly due to the prasinophytes in addition to the chlorophytes. The peri:chl a ratio (0.515) for dinoflagellates remained unchanged in the Mandovi estuary which is similar to reported [26,34]. Similarly cryptophytes were a major component of the phytoplankton in the Mandovi estuary also observed in other estuarine and coastal waters [29,35,36]. The allo:chl a ratio (0.186) was similar to the other estuaries reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref37">37</xref>] (0.229); [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref38">38</xref>] (0.234); [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref39">39</xref>] (0.278), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref40">40</xref>] (0.186), but lower than the earliar reports [11,29]. The zea:chl a ratio for cyanobacteria in the Mandovi estuary was 0.349 during MoN. This value was lower than the reported values for other estuaries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref26">26</xref>] (0.846); [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref29">29</xref>] (1.12); [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref34">34</xref>] (0.836)]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref41">41</xref>] (1.24); [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref42">42</xref>] (1.20) and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref43">43</xref>] (0.7).</p><p>Besides diatoms, a reduction in the number of prasinophytes was also recorded during the MoN period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The occurrence of chlorophytes, cryptophytes and cyanobacteria as important groups of phytoplankton was recorded for the first time from this or any other tropical estuary. High concentrations of the chlorophytes and cryptophytes have been known to prevail in the Kirka River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref44">44</xref>], the Hudson River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref45">45</xref>], the Urdaibai estuary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref37">37</xref>] and the Nervious River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29229-ref11">11</xref>]. The CHEMTAX analysis employed in our study gives a new insight into the community structure of the phytoplankton in the Mandovi estuary. The CHEMTAX analysis of the Mandovi estuary (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) revealed a decrease in diatoms upto 53% of total phytoplankton and an increase in dinoflagellates upto 11% during PostM (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Another interesting aspect was that of cryptophytes that increased from 7% to 22% of the phytoplankton population during PreM and MoN. The high percentage of cyanobacteria during the PreM was due to the Trichodesmium erythraeum presence in the Mandovi estuary. The percentage of picocyanobacteria was around 15% - 20% throughout the study, which is reasonably high (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). During the InterM, the increase seen in the diatom population was due to high nitrate levels which was as high as 26 &#181;g·L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)). However, although nitrate was high, low salinity and low temperature during the monsoon has affected diatom at population level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). As the salinity lowered during the monsoon, there was an increase in the prymnesiophytes, prasinophytes, cyanobacteria and cryptophytes. Salinity was showing upward values during PostM and favored diatoms initially and dinoflagellates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Diatoms are an important group of phytoplankton found during the pre-monsoon season. Further, more they are affected by the freshwater that is experienced more during the peak monsoon season. Dinoflagellate bloom of Scrippsiella trochoidea followed bloom of Skeletonema costatum at the end of MoN and continued during PostM season. Besides this, chlorophytes and cryptophytes constitute an important part of the phytoplankton community during monsoon. The presence of the Trichodesmium erythraeum and Trichodesmium thiebautii during PreM and InterM season and pico-cyanobacteria during MoN comprised of as high as 19% of the total phytoplankton biomass. Land runoff was the cause of bloom of the Gyrodinium spirale at the end of the monsoon. Probability of such HAB events in this and the other tropical estuaries suggests the requirement of the phytoplankton monitoring programme in this estuary.</p><p>Since samples were collected at fixed time, area is subjected to tidal variation on daily basis. The weekly tidal cycle is characteristics feature. The chl a, phytoplankton numbers, phytoplankton volume, diatom numbers and fuco:chl a ratio are averaged for weekly basis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Effect of monsoon is clearly seen on phytoplankton biomass specially diatom as the group during this averaging exercise (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). A linear relationship was also existed in chl a to fuco relationship where r<sup>2</sup> = 0.8 (n = 187) indicates the importance of diatom in the estuarine region. Such diatom estimated by CHEMTAX and microscopy showed 1:1 relationship on overall basis (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.8, n = 187).</p><p>6. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr. S. R. Shetye, Director, National Institute of Oceanography, Goa for involving us and guiding during the Monsoon Experiment in the Mandovi Estuary. A DST Fellowship to S. G. Parab is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Mrs. Suraksha Pednekar and Mr. Subhojit Basu for help during field work. This is an NIO contribution (No. 5319).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.29229-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. R. Shetye, I. Suresh and D. Sundar, “Tides and Sea Level Variability,” In: S. R. Shetye, D. Kumar and D. Shankar, Eds., The Mandovi and Zuari Estuaries, National Institute of Oceanography, Dona-Paula, 2007, pp. 59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. K. Varma, L. V. G. Rao and C. Thomas, “Temporal and Spatial Variations in Hygrographic Conditions of Mandovi Estuary,” Indian Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 4, 1975, pp. 11-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. R. Shetye and C. S. Murthy, “Seasonal Variation of Salinity in the Zuari Estuary Goa India,” Proceedings Indian Academic Science (Earth Planet Science), Vol. 96, 1987, pp. 249-257.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. R. Shetye, A. D. Gouveia, S. Y. S. Singbal, C. G. Naik, D. Sundar, G. S. and G. M. Nampoothiri, “Propagation of Tides in the Mandovi-Zuari Estuarine Network,” Proceedings Indian Academic Science (Earth Planet Science), Vol. 104, No. 4, 1996, pp. 667-682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. R. Shetye, D. Shankar, N. Singh, N. Suprit, G. S. Michael and P. Chandramohan, “The Environment That Conditions the Mandovi and Zuari Estuaries,” In: S. R. Shetye, D. Kumar and D. Shankar, Eds., The Mandovi and Zuari Estuaries, National Institute of Oceanography, Dona-Paula, 2007, p. 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Vijith, D. Sundar and S. R. Shetye, “Time-Dependence of Salinity in Monsoonal Estuaries,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 85, No. 4, 2009, pp. 601-608. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2009.10.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. N. DeSousa, R. SenGupta, S. Sanzgiri and M. D. Rajagopal, “Studies on Nutrients of Mandovi and Zuari River Systems,” Indian Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 10, 1981, pp. 314-321.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. P. Devassy and J. I. Goes, “Seasonal Pattern of Phytoplankton Biomass and Productivity in a Tropical Estuarine Complex (West Coast of India),” Proceedings Indian Academic Science (Earth Planet Science), Vol. 99, 1989, pp. 485-501.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Wright, S. M. Jeffrey, R. F. C. Mantoura, C. A. Llewellyn, T. Bjornland, D. Repeta and N. Welschmeyer, “Improved HPLC Method for the Analysis of Chlorophylls and Carotenoids from Marine Phytoplankton,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 77, 1991, pp. 183-196. doi:10.3354/meps077183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. L. Lewitus, D. L. White, R. G. Tymowki, M. E. Geesey, S. N. Hymel and P. A. Noble, “Adapting the CHEMTAX Method for Assessing Phytoplankton Taxonomic Composition in Southeastern US Estuaries,” Estuaries, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2005, pp. 160-172.  
doi:10.1007/BF02732761</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Seoane, A. Laza and E. Orive, “Monitoring Phytoplankton Assemblages in Estuarine Waters: The Application of Pigment Analysis and Microcopy to Size-Fractionated Samples,” Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, Vol. 67, No. 3, 2006, pp. 343-354.  
doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.10.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Gameiro, P. Cartaxana and V. Brotas, “Environmental Drivers of Phytoplankton Distribution and Composition in Tagus Estuary Portugal,” Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, Vol. 75, No. 1-2, 2007, pp. 21-34.  
doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.05.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Lionard, K. Muylaert, M. Tackx and W. Vyverman, “Evaluation of the Performance of HPLC-CHEMTAX Analysis for Determining Phytoplankton Biomass and Composition in a Turbid Estuary (Schelde, Belgium),” Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2008, pp. 809-817. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. V. Maya, R. Agnihotri, A. K. Pratihary, S. Karapurkar, H. Naik and S. W. A. Naqvi, “Variations in Some Environmental Characteristics Including C and N Stable Isotopic Composition of Suspended Organic Matter in the Mandovi Estuary,” Environmental Monitoring, Vol. 175, No. 1-4, 2011, pp. 501-517.  
doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1547-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. H. Strickland and I. R. Parsons, “A Manual of Seawater Analysis,” Bulletin Fishery Research, Vol. 125, 1965, pp. 65-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. G. Parab, S. G. Prabhu Matondkar, H. do R. Gomes and J. I. Goes, “Monsoon Driven Changes in Phytoplankton Population in the Eastern Arabian Sea as Revealed by Microscopy and HPLC Pigment Analysis,” Continental Shelf Research, Vol. 26, No. 20, 2006, pp. 2538-2558. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2006.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. G. Bidigare and C. T. Charles, “HPLC Phytoplankton Pigments: Sampling Laboratory Methods and Quality Assurance Procedures,” In: G. S. Fargion and J. L. Muellier, Eds., Protocols for Satellite Ocean Colour Validation Revisions, NASA, Greenbelt, 2002, pp. 154-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. D. Mackey, D. J. Mackey, H. W. Higgins and S. W. Wright, “CHEMTAX—A Programme for Estimating Class Abundance from Chemical Markers: Application to HPLC Measurements of Phytoplankton,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 144, 1996, pp. 265-283.  
doi:10.3354/meps144265</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. M. Pednekar, S. G. Prabhu Matondkar, H. R. Gomes, J. I. Goes, S. G. Parab and V. Kerkar, “Fine-Scale Responses of Phytoplankton to Freshwater Influx in a Tropical Monsoonal Estuary Following the Onset of Southwest Monsoon,” Journal of Earth System Science, Vol. 120, No. 3, 2011, pp. 545-556.  
doi:10.1007/s12040-011-0073-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Z. Qasim and R. SenGupta, “Environmental Characteristics of the Mandovi-Zuari Estuarine System in Goa,” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1981, pp. 557-578. doi:10.1016/S0302-3524(81)80058-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. N. De Sousa, “Studies on the Behavior of Nutrients in the Mandovi Estuary during Premonsoon,” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1983, pp. 299-308. doi:10.1016/0272-7714(83)90147-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. P. Devassy and J. I. Goes, “Phytoplankton Community Structure and Succession in Tropical Estuarine Complex,” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 27, No. 6, 1988, pp. 671-685. doi:10.1016/0272-7714(88)90074-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. P. Gopinathan, “Seasonal Abundance of Phytoplankton in the Cochin Backwaters,” Journal of Marine Biological Association of India, Vol. 14, 1974, pp. 568-577.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Fernandes and C. T. Achutankutty, “Seasonal Variation in Fishery Diversity of Some Wetlands of the Salcete Taluka Goa,” Indian Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 39, 2010, pp. 238-247.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Gibb, D. G. Cummings, X. Irigoien, R. G. Barlow and R. F. C. Mantoura, “Phytoplankton Pigment Chemotaxonomy of the Northeastern Atlantic,” Deep-Sea Research Part II, Vol. 48, 2001, pp. 795-823.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Rodriguez, Y. Pazos, J. Maneiro and M. Zapata, “Temporal Variation in Phytoplankton Assemblages and Pigment Composition at a Fixed Station of the Ria of Pontevedra (NW Spain),” Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, Vol. 58, No. 3, 2003, pp. 499-515.  
doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00130-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Breten, C. Brunet, B. Sautour and J. M. Brylinski, “Annual Variations of Phytoplankton Biomass in the Eastern English Channel: Comparison by Pigment Signatures and Microscopic Counts,” Journal of Plankton Research, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2000, pp. 1423-1440.  
doi:10.1093/plankt/22.8.1423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Not, M. Latasa, D. Marie, T. Cariou, D. Vailot and N. Simon, “A Single Species, Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae), Dominates the Eukaryotic Picoplankton in the Western English Channel,” Applied Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 70, No. 7, 2004, pp. 4064-4072.  
doi:10.1128/AEM.70.7.4064-4072.2004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. I. Carreto, N. G. Montoya, H. R. Benavides, R. Guerrero and M. O. Carignan, “Characterization of Spring Phytoplankton Communities in the Rio de La Plata Maritime Front Using Pigment Signatures and Cell Microscopy,” Marine Biology, Vol. 143, No. 5, 2003, pp. 1013-1027. doi:10.1007/s00227-003-1147-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. E. Lohrenz, C. L. Carroll, A. D. Weidemann and M. Tuel, “Variations in Phytoplankton Pigments Size Structure and Community Composition Related to Wind Forcing and Water Mass Properties on the North Carolina Inter Shelf,” Continental Shelf Research, Vol. 23, No. 14-15, 2003, pp. 1447-1464.  
doi:10.1016/S0278-4343(03)00131-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Schluter and F. Mohlenberg, “Detecting of Phytoplankton Groups with Non-Specific Pigment Signatures,” Journal of Applied Science, Vol. 15, 2003, pp. 465-476.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P, Henriksen, B. Riemann, H. Kaas, H. M. Sorensen and H. L. Sorensen, “Effect of Nutrient-Limitation and Irradiance on Marine Phytoplankton Pigments,” Journal of Plankton Research, Vol. 24, No. 9, 2002, pp. 835-858.  
doi:10.1093/plankt/24.9.835</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Latasa, R. Scharek, F. Le Gall and L. Guillou, “Pigment Suites and Taxonomic Groups in Prasinophyceae,” Journal of Phycology, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1149-1155. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03136.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. A. Martinez, S. Seone, M. Zapata and E. Orive, “Phytoplankton Pigment Patterns in a Temperate Estuary: from Unialgal Cultures to Natural Assemblages,” Journal of Plankton Research, Vol. 29, No. 11, 2007, pp. 913-929.  
doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Brunet and F. Lizon, “Tidal and Diel Periodicities of Size-Fractionated Phytoplankton Pigment Signatures at an Offshore Station in the Southeastern English Channel,” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 56, No. 3-4, 2003, pp. 833-843.  
doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00323-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. A. Garibotti, M. Vernet, W. A. Kozlowski and M. E. Ferrario, “Composition and Biomass of Phytoplankton Assemblages in Coastal Antarctic Waters: A Comparison of Chemotaxonomic and Microscopic Analyses,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 247, 2003, pp. 27-42.  
doi:10.3354/meps247027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ansotegui, J. M. Trigueros and E. Orive, “The Use of Pigment Signatures to Assess Phytoplankton Assemblage Structure in Estuarine Waters,” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2001, pp. 689-703.  
doi:10.1006/ecss.2001.0785</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. W. C. Gieskes and G. W. Kraay, “Dominance of Cryptophyceae during the Phytoplankton Spring Bloom in the Central North Sea Detected by HPLC Analysis and Pigments,” Marine Biology, Vol. 75, No. 2-3, 1983. pp. 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF00406000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. G. Barlow, R. F. C. Mantoura, R. D. Peinert, A. E. J. Miller and T. W. Fileman, “Distribution Sedimentation and Fate of Pigment Biomarkers Following Thermal Stratification in the Western Alboran Sea,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 125, 1995, pp. 279-291.  
doi:10.3354/meps125279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Wright, D. P. Thomas, H. J. Marchant, H. W. Higgins, M. D. Mackey and D. J. Mackey, “Analysis of Phytoplankton of the Australian Sector of the Southern Ocean: Comparison of Microscopy and Size Frequency Data with Interpretations of Pigment HPLC Data Using the ‘CHEMTAX’ Matrix Factorization Program,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 144, 1996, pp. 285-298.  
doi:10.3354/meps144285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Schluter, F. Mohlenberg, H. Havskum and S. Larsen, “The Use of Phytoplankton Pigment/Chlorophyll a Ratios,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 192, 2000, pp. 49-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. M. Kana, P. M. Gilbert, R. Goericke and N. A. Welschmeyer, “Zeaxanthin and ‘Beta’-Carotene in Synechococcus WH7803 Respond Differently to Irradiance,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1988, pp. 1623-1627. doi:10.4319/lo.1988.33.6_part_2.1623</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Morel, Y. H. Ahh, F. Partensky, D. Vaulot and H. Claustre, “Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus: A Comparative Study of Their Optical Properties in Relation to Their Size and Pigmentation,” Journal of Marine Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1993, pp. 617-649.  
doi:10.1357/0022240933223963</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Denant, A. Saliot and R. F. C. Mantoura, “Distribution of Algal Chlorophyll and Carotenoids Pigments in a Stratified Estuary: The Krka Estuary Adriatic Sea,” Marine Chemistry, Vol. 32, No. 2-4, 1991, pp. 285-297.  
doi:10.1016/0304-4203(91)90044-W</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29229-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. S. Bianchi, S. Findlay and R. Dawson, “Organic Matter Sources in the Water Column and Sediments of the Hudson River Estuary: The Use of Plant Pigments as Tracers,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1993, pp. 359-376. doi:10.1006/ecss.1993.1022</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>