<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OPJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Optics and Photonics Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8881</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/opj.2013.31007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OPJ-28893</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Fluorometric Viability Assessment of Capacitated and Acrosome-Reacted Boar Spermatozoa by Flow Cytometry
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>eyna</surname><given-names>Fierro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Humberto</surname><given-names>González-Márquez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rocío</surname><given-names>Ortiz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jérôme</surname><given-names>Chevrier</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bernard</surname><given-names>Foliguet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratoire d’Histologie, Embryologie et Microscopie électronique, Université Lorraine, Nancy, France</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>reynacarmen2@hotmail.com(EF)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>03</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>16,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Sperm capacitation involves functional changes, such as the removal or appearance of specific molecules and changes in the plasma membrane; the acrosome reaction (AR) is an exocytotic event induced by calcium influx, enabling the spermatozoa to penetrate the zona pellucida. These processes can be achieved only if the spermatozoa have good viability; indeed, determination of sperm viability is used for the assessment of semen quality. Membrane integrity and mitochondrial activity are important viability parameters of spermatozoa and fluorescent techniques based on membrane permeability to dyes have been developed to determine these parameters. The aim of this work was to determine the viability of boar sperm (fresh, one hour of capacitation induction and 20 min of AR induction) by flow cytometry using propidium iodide (PI) (1.25 μg/mL) and rhodamine 123 (R123) (0.20 μg/mL). Aliquots of 5 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> sperm were incubated with each fluorochrome separately and simultaneously for 10 or 20 min, respectively, at 38℃. The proportion of labeled spermatozoa and their fluorescence intensities were measured using a flow cytometer. The fluorescence index (FI) with PI gradually increased during the incubation and we found significant differences between all the groups. With R123, the FI increased in the capacitated sperm but decreased in the acrosome-reacted sperm, with significant differences between the fresh and capacitated spermatozoa. Our results suggest that the increase in the R123 fluorescence intensity in capacitated spermatozoa is due to changes in the mitochondrial membrane activity because the spermatozoa experienced changes in membrane fluidity and flagellar activation during capacitation. The use of fluorochromes and flow cytometry is a good tool for monitoring many markers of sperm function. Although capacitation and AR processes have been well studied, there is still much information to be elucidated with regard to these complex processes. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Boar Sperm; Flow Cytometry; Propidium Iodide; Rhodamine 123; Viability</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Fertilization in mammalian species is a process with sequential steps, including sperm capacitation in the female genital tract, binding of capacitated sperm to the zona pellucida (ZP), induction of the acrosome reaction (AR), penetration of the ZP and fusion of sperm with the egg vitelline membrane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref1">1</xref>]. Sperm capacitation involves metabolic and functional changes such as the removal or appearance of specific molecules and important changes in the plasma membrane; the acrosome reaction is an exocytotic event induced by calcium influx that renders the spermatozoa capable to penetrate the ZP and fuse with the plasma membrane of the egg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>However, these processes can be achieved only if the spermatozoa are viable, in addition to other parameters. The determination of sperm viability is a useful technique for the assessment of semen quality; membrane integrity and mitochondrial activity are important viability parameters of spermatozoa. Different fluorescent techniques based on the permeability of the cell membrane to dyes have been developed to determine these parameters; it is possible to detect one or more different fluorochromes in a cell, enabling the simultaneous quantification and analysis of the fluorescence intensity of one or more populations [3,4]. Propidium iodide (PI) is a vital fluorescent dye that binds DNA in a non-covalent manner, indicating plasma membrane damage when cells emit red fluorescence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref5">5</xref>]. Rhodamine 123 (R123) is a vital fluorescent dye that directly stains mitochondria, providing low-background high-resolution green fluorescence; because there are no apparent cytotoxic effects, it is used often to assess mitochondrial function [6,7]. Flow cytometry has been used to quantify the fluorescence intensity emitted by large populations of stained sperm cells in a short period of time [8-10].</p><p>The aim of this work was to determine the viability of boar sperm (fresh, one hour post-capacitation induction and acrosome reacted) by flow cytometry using PI and R123.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise indicated.</p><p>Semen samples were obtained from the sperm-enriched fraction of the ejaculates from 3 healthy Landrace fertile boars using the gloved-hand method, followed by the removal of the gelatinous fraction.</p><p>Semen analysis was performed under a light microscope. All the samples were classified as normozoospermic according to established criteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref11">11</xref>]. The semen was diluted in Beltsville liquid extender (BL-1) to improve the viability of the sperm during the 12 h required for transportation at 16˚C [12,13].</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Fresh Sperm</title><p>To remove the semen plasma, the semen was washed twice by adding 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to an equal volume of semen, followed by centrifugation at 600&#215; g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Capacitation Induction</title><p>Following the two washes described above, the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. Aliquots of 8 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cells were seeded in a Nunc 4-well multidish (Nunc, Denmark) with 1 mL of capacitation medium (TALPHEPES) supplemented with 6 mg/mL<sup> </sup>of bovine serum albumin fraction V (BSA) and 7 mM sodium pyruvate, pH 7.4 [14,15].</p><p>The cells were incubated for 1 h at 39˚C in a humid atmosphere with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref16">16</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Acrosome Reaction (AR) Induction</title><p>Progesterone was added to the samples at a final concentration of 10 &#181;g/mL to induce the AR and incubated for 20 min under the same conditions as above [17,18].</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Flow Cytometry</title><p>Aliquots of 5 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> sperm in 200 &#181;L were incubated under three conditions:</p><p>1) 25 &#181;L of IP (1.25 μg/mL) for 10 min at 38˚C. The samples were then washed twice in 1 mL of PBS and centrifuged for 5 min at 600&#215; g.</p><p>2) 5 &#181;L of R123 (0.20 μg/mL) for 10 min at 38˚C. The samples were then washed twice in 1 mL of PBS and centrifuged for 5 min at 600&#215; g.</p><p>3) 25 &#181;L of IP (1.25 μg/mL) and 5 &#181;L of R123 (0.20 μg/mL) for 20 min at 38˚C. The samples were then washed twice in 1 mL of PBS and centrifuged for 5 min at 600&#215; g.</p><p>The labeled pellets were resuspended and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The proportion of labeled spermatozoa and their fluorescence intensities were measured using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Immunocytometry System, CA, USA). Five thousand cells per sample were analyzed. The data were analyzed using a paired Student’s T test; probability values P &lt; 0.05 were considered significant [4,16].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Light Microscopy</title><p>Sperm viability was evaluated by eosin-nigrosin staining (1% eosin and 5% nigrosin), mixing three parts of semen and one part of stain. Two hundred cells of each dried preparation were analyzed using a light microscopy (magnification &#215; 400) [19,20].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>There are many interrelated physiological aspects of spermatozoa, including viability, motility and mitochondrial function and such characteristics can be assessed by flow cytometry. Using live and dead cells, the optimal final stain concentrations specific for the sperm concentrations and culture conditions used in this study were determined in preliminary assays (data not shown).</p><p>We analyzed the sperm viability of samples transported in BL-1 under three conditions: fresh (without incubation), capacitated (one hour of incubation in capacitation medium) and acrosome reacted (acrosome reaction induced with progesterone).</p><p>We expressed the results of flow cytometry as the Fluorescence index (FI) by multiplying the percentage and fluorescence intensity of the labeled sperm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref10">10</xref>]. When stained only with PI, we observed that the FI of the reacted sperm was higher than in the capacitated sperm and still higher than in the fresh sperm, with statistically significant differences. There was no difference between the fresh and capacitated sperm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>We observed significant differences between the groups of fresh and capacitated sperm, between the fresh and reacted sperm and between the capacitated and reacted sperm when using R123 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Regarding the combined staining with PI and R123, it was observed that the FI emitted by PI gradually increased and we found significant differences between the fresh and reacted and between the capacitated and reacted sperm. Using R123, the FI increased in the capacitated but decreased in the acrosome-reacted sperm, with</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Sperm viability evaluated with propidium iodide and flow cytometry (fluorescence index).</p><p><img src="7-1190184\3001e90e-6c4d-46c9-831e-3485a3a74522.jpg" /></p><p><sup>a,</sup><sup> </sup><sup>b</sup>: P &lt; 0.005.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Sperm viability evaluated with Rhodamine 123 and flow cytometry (fluorescence index).</p><p><img src="7-1190184\c48a55db-e32b-4761-805b-a36c9e2f7538.jpg" /></p><p><sup>a</sup>: P &lt; 0.05; <sup>b</sup>: P &lt; 0.005.</p><p>significant differences between the fresh and capacitated sperm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>); although there was no significant difference between the capacitated and acrosome-reacted groups, there was a tendency toward a decrease of fluorescence in acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. These data are consistent with those found when using PI and R123 separately. It is important to note that by increasing the temperature to 25˚C, Medrano et al. detected changes in the permeability of the spermatozoa plasma membrane, and these authors reported many fluorescent cells using PI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref21">21</xref>]. We think that PI is not the best vital stain for capacitated and acrosome-reacted spermatozoa studies because the plasma and acrosome membranes become fluid and permeable during these processes, resulting in inaccurate data.</p><p>The staining intensity of R123 is concentration dependent under equilibrium conditions over a range of 0.2 - l50 &#181;g/mL. Some authors report the use of 10 &#181;g/mL [7,22], however we used a lower concentration and found a good fluorescent signal. The use of R123 is advantageous because it measures the mitochondrial activity of spermatozoa that are still alive, even though the plasma membrane is permeable because of the acrosome reaction and these spermatozoa could be counted as dead cells by PI staining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>Our results suggest that the increase in R123 fluorescence intensity in capacitated sperm is due to changes in the mitochondrial activity rather than the mitochondrial number because the spermatozoa underwent flagellar</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Sperm viability evaluated simultaneously using PI and R123 and flow cytometry (fluorescence index).</p><p><img src="7-1190184\52e9b8ea-88ff-451a-bca1-560d1e49f0a9.jpg" /></p><p><sup>a</sup><sup>,b</sup>: P &lt; 0.05; <sup>c</sup>: P &lt; 0.001.</p><p>activation during the capacitation process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref24">24</xref>]. The capacitation status has been observed through calciummediated changes using chlortetracycline or by changes in membrane fluidity monitored by the binding of the fluorescent amphiphilic probes Merocyanine 540, annexin-V, C6NBD and Ro-09-0198 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28893-ref25">25</xref>]. To our knowledge, there are no reports of the status of mitochondrial activity of boar sperm measured with R123 after one hour of capacitation.</p><p>To verify and to compare our flow cytometry data, we also utilized light microscopy with eosin-nigrosin staining to evaluate the sperm samples. Using this technique, the dead sperm stained red or pink because the integrity of their plasma membranes had been compromised, causing an increase in membrane permeability that led to the uptake of the dye; in contrast, the live sperm remained white. We found a gradual decrease in live sperm, i.e., the fresh sperm group had a greater percentage of living cells (80 &#177; 12), which decreased after one hour of capacitation induction (62 &#177; 9) and decreased further in the acrosome-reacted group (54 &#177; 12); the differences between the fresh and the other two groups were significant (P &lt; 0.05, n = 5). These data are in agreement with those obtained with the PI-flow cytometry method.</p><p>The use of fluorochromes and flow cytometry is a good tool for monitoring many markers of sperm function. Although the capacitation and acrosome reaction processes have been studied for many years, being that these processes are so complex, there is still much information to be elucidated.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was partially supported by the CONACYT (M&#233;xico) grant 0105961/10110/194/09. The authors thank Jacqueline Chanel for technical assistance.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.28893-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Yanagimachi, “Mechanisms of Fertilization in Mammals,” In: L. Mastroianni and J. D. Biggers, Eds., Fertilization and Embryonic Development in Vitro, Plenum Press, New York, 1981, pp. 81-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Yanagimachi, “Mammalian Fertilization,” In: E. Knobil and J. D. Neill, Eds., The Physiology of Reproduction, Vol. 1, Raven Press, New York, 1994, pp. 189-317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Talbot and R. Chacon, “A Triple Stain Technique for Evaluating Normal Acrosome Reactions of Human Sperm,” Journal of Experimental Zoology, Vol. 215, No. 2, 1981, pp. 201-211. doi:10.1002/jez.1402150210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Fierro, M. C. Bene, B. Foliguet, G. C. Faure and G. Grignon, “Evaluation of Human Sperm Acrosome Reaction and Viability by Flow Cytometry,” Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, Vol. 103, No. 41998, pp. 75-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. L. Garner, D. Pinkel, L. A. Johnson and M. M. Pace, “Assessment of Spermatozoal Function Using Dual Fluorescent Staining and Flow Cytometric Analyses,” Biology of Reproduction, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1986, pp. 127-138.  
doi:10.1095/biolreprod34.1.127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. V. Johnson, M. L. Walsh and L. B. Chen, “Localization of Mitochondria in Living Cells with Rhodamine 123,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 77, No. 2, 1980, pp. 990-994.  
doi:10.1073/pnas.77.2.990</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. P. Evenson, Z. Darzynkiewicz and M. R. Melamed, “Simultaneous Measurement by Flow Cytometry of Sperm Cell Viability and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Related to Cell Motility,” The Journal of Histochemistry &amp; Cytochemistry, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1982, pp. 279-280. doi:10.1177/30.3.6174566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Van Dilla, B. L. Gledhill, S. Lake, P. N. Dean, J. W. Gray, V. Kachel, et al., “Measurement of Mammalian Sperm Deoxyribonucleic Acid by Flow Cytometry. Problems and Approaches,” The Journal of Histochemistry &amp; Cytochemistry, Vol. 25, No. 7, 1977, pp. 763-773.  
doi:10.1177/25.7.70455</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kerker, D. S. Wang and H. W. Chew, “An Optical Model for Fluorescence of Mammalian Sperm in Flow Cytometry,” Cytometry, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1980, pp. 161-167.  
doi:10.1002/cyto.990010212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Fierro, B. Foliguet, G. Grignon, M. Daniel, M. C. Bene, G. C. Faure, et al., “Lectin-Binding Sites on Human Sperm During Acrosome Reaction: Modifications Judged by Electron Microscopy/Flow Cytometry,” Archives of Andrology, Vol. 136, No. 3, 1996, pp. 187-196.  
doi:10.3109/01485019608987095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. L. Garner and E. S. E. Hafez, “Spermatozoa and Seminal Plasma,” In: E. S. E. Hafez, Ed., Reproduction in Farm Animals, Lea &amp; Febiger, Philadelphia, 1993, pp. 165-187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. A. Johnson, J. G. Aalbers, C. M. T. Willems, J. H. M. Rademaker and C. E. Rexroad Jr., “Use of Boar Spermatozoa for Artificial Insemination. III. Fecundity of Boar Spermatozoa Stored in Beltsville Liquid and Kiev Extenders for Three Days at 18?C,” Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 1982, pp. 132-136. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Conejo-Nava, R. Fierro, C. G. Gutierrez and M. Betancourt, “Membrane Status and in Vitro Capacitation of Porcine Sperm Preserved in Long-Term Extender at 16?C,” Archives of Andrology, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2003, pp. 287-295. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Bonilla, A. Amador and M. Betancourt, “In Vitro Capacitation of Boar Sperm in a Protein-Free Medium Supplemented with Histidine and Cysteine,” Medical Science Research, Vol. 22, 1994, pp. 725-726.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Betancourt, R. Fierro and D. Ambriz, “In Vitro Fertilization of Pig Oocytes Matured in Vitro,” Theriogenology, Vol. 40, 1993, pp. 1155-1160.  
doi:10.1016/0093-691X(93)90286-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. Jiménez, H. Gonzalez-Marquez, R. Ortiz, M. Betancourt, J. Herrera and R. Fierro, “Expression of Lectin Receptors on the Membrane Surface of Sperm of Fertile and Subfertile Boars by Flow Cytometry,” Archives of Andrology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2002, pp. 159-166.  
doi:10.1080/014850102317267481</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Berger, “Pisum Sativun Agglutinen Used as an Acrosomal Stain of Parene and Craprine Sperm,” Theriogenology, Vol. 33, 1990, pp. 689-695.  
doi:10.1016/0093-691X(90)90546-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. A. Herrera, R. Fierro, H. Zayas, A. García, J. Conejo, I. Jiménez, et al., “Acrosome Reaction in Fertile and Subfertile Boar Sperm,” Archives of Andrology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2002, pp. 161-167. doi:10.1080/014850102317267445</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. B. Emilson, K. A. Dougherty, A. T. Cockett and R. L. Urry, “Simultaneous Determination of Human Sperm Morphology and Viability: Simple Office Technique,” Urology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1978, pp. 488-491.  
doi:10.1016/0090-4295(78)90165-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. R. Bakst, “Fertilizing Capacity and Morphology of Fowl and Turkey Spermatozoa in Hypotonic Extender,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1980, pp. 121-127. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0600121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Medrano and W. V. Holt, “Protective Effects of Glycerol during Cold Shock in Boar Spermatozoa. A Cryomicroscope Study Using Propidium Iodide and SYBR-14,” Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1995, pp. 281-282. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0531.1995.tb00052.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. K. Graham, E. Kunze and R H. Hammerstedt, “Analysis of Sperm Cell Viability, Acrosomal Integrity, and Mitochondrial Function Using Flow Cytometry,” Biology of Reproduction, Vol. 43, No. 1, 1990, pp. 55-64.  
doi:10.1095/biolreprod43.1.55</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. J. McLean, N. Korn, B. S. Perez and R. J. Thurston, “Isolation and Characterization of Mitochondria from Turkey Spermatozoa,” Journal of Andrology, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1993, pp. 433-438.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Marquez and S. S. Suarez, “Different Signaling Pathways in Bovine Sperm Regulate Capacitation and Hyperactivation,” Biology of Reproduction, Vol. 70, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1626-1633. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.026476</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28893-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Gillan, G. Evans and W. M. C. Maxwell, “Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Sperm Parameters in Relation to Fertility Potential,” Theriogenology, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2005, pp. 445-457. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.024.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>