<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2013.42A059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-28480</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Only Attract Ants? The Versatility of Petiolar Extrafloral Nectaries in &lt;i&gt;Passiflora&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>oliana</surname><given-names>Cardoso-Gustavson</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nathalia</surname><given-names>L. Andreazza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexandra</surname><given-names>C. H. F. Sawaya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marilia</surname><given-names>de Moraes Castro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Pós-Gradua??o em Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil </addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>cardoso.poliana@gmail.com(OC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>460</fpage><lpage>469</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>21st,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>January</day>	<month>21st,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>28th,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Passiflora species presents a coevolutive relationship with Heliconiini butterflies, their primary herbivores. The Heliconiini caterpillars are able to detoxify toxic compounds produced by Passiflora, thus morphological defense strategies stand out over chemical innovations. In this framework, we highlight the presence of mimetic structures and extrafloral nectaries (EFN) as morphological strategies. Heliconian butterflies oviposit only on leaves that do not possess previous eggs, so the presence of egg mimics could prevent the oviposition. EFN are glands that offer nectar to territorial and aggressive ants, establishing mutualistic relationships. Here, we present a structural and chemical analysis of petiolar EFN and nectar from Passiflora alata and P. edulis in order to have insights about the implications of these features in deterring heliconian caterpillars. P. alata have one to four stipitate-crateriform EFN while P. edulis possess a pair of convex glands. Butterflies lay their eggs isolatedly or in up to three on leaves of both species. Our morphological results suggest that EFN from P. alata may act as egg mimics. Ontogenetic data suggest that the variation in the number of glands observed in this species is a serial homology, wherein the selection pressure for this variation is possibly the oviposition pattern. P. alata retain alkaloids, flavonoids and terpenoids inside nectariferous cells; sugars and flavonoids are found in the nectar of both species, while alkaloids are also detected in P. edulis. There is a selective retention/release of secondary metabolites from the EFN tissues to nectar. Knowing that these compounds can be dissuasive to some herbivores and inoffensive to others, we plotted this relationship in a consumer growth versus secondary metabolite concentration diagram. Our results suggest a more active role in the modulation of the gland defense from plants besides the establishment of a mutualistic relationship with ants, an important response in a coevolutive scenario. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Passiflora alata&lt;/i&gt; Curtis; &lt;i&gt;Passiflora edulis&lt;/i&gt; Sims; Egg Mimics; Anatomy; Secondary Metabolites</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Passiflora L. species presents a great vegetative structural complexity as a result of evolutionary advances developed from coevolutive relationships with their primary herbivores, the butterflies from Heliconiini tribe [1-3]. Caterpillars of Agraulis, Dione, Eueides and Heliconius species can easily defoliate the host plants and represent the major biotic challenge to survival of Passiflora in tropics [1,2,4].</p><p>Changes in the behavior of the herbivores caused by morphological strategies of plants possess greater influence over the course of evolution of Heliconiini butterflies and Passiflora in detriment to the presence of defensive chemical compounds [5,6]. Considering the ability of Heliconius butterflies to detoxify compounds produced by Passiflora species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref7">7</xref>], the development of morphological strategies becomes essential to the maintenance of the fitness of these species.</p><p>Passiflora possess several defense strategies, highlighting the morphological innovations as mimics structures and extrafloral nectaries (EFN) as an evolutionary response to herbivorous caterpillars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref3">3</xref>]. Egg mimics are structures derived from diverse plant tissues that present morphological features resembling butterflies eggs. These structures discourage butterflies ovipositions that possess solitary and aggressive caterpillars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref8">8</xref>]. EFN are a biotic defense which glands present on several vegetative or reproductive organs-not related to pollination-offer nectar to territorial and aggressive ants, establishing mutualistic relationships [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref9">9</xref>]. Simple sugars are predominant in nectar composition, while other compounds as secondary metabolites occur in lower concentration [10,11], although this occurrence is best documented in nectar from floral nectaries [11-13].</p><p>Passiflora alata and P. edulis are species of high economical value. Both possess a distinct morphology of petiolar EFN. P. alata has one to four glands whose number varies in the same branch; these glands are about 1 - 2 mm high and yellowish stipitate-crateriform shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). P. edulis has a pair of EFN on the base of the leaf blade, 1.5 mm high, green on shaded plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(g)) and reddish on plants exposed to sunlight (Figures 1(e) and (f)).</p><p>We focused on structural and chemical aspects of petiolar EFN because the modulation of the qualitative aspects of the nectar produced and released from these glands can be a morphological strategy against heliconnian caterpillars within a coevolutive scenario. We also suggest a possible path that allows the plant to relate differently to herbivores and mutualistic invertebrates.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material and Field Observations</title><p>Vegetative branches of three individuals of Passiflora alata and P. edulis were collected from plants growing in Centro de Pesquisas Qu&#237;micas, Biol&#243;gicas e Agr&#237;colas</p><p>(CPQBA, Brazil). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Universidade Estadual de Campinas (P. alata: UEC 145620; P. edulis: UEC 111509).</p><p>Morphological aspects of individuals exposed to shade and sunlight conditions were registered. Two plants of each species were observed over four consecutive days during the beginning of the morning (4 - 7 am) in the months of December to March (2008/2009). Nectar feeding visitors were collected, preserved in 70% ethanol and sent for identification.</p><p>The base of branches was isolated with Tanglefood grease to avoid the removal of the exudate by insects. In the subsequent morning, exudate was tested with Glicophita Plus (Bayer S. A.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref14">14</xref>] and collected for chemical analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)</title><p>Petiolar EFN at different developmental stages were fixed in Karnovsky [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref15">15</xref>]. The material was washed, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, critical point dried and coated with a thin layer of gold. Observations were carried out on a JEOL JSM 5000 LV 6350 scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Light Microscopy</title><p>Petiolar EFN were fixed in FAA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref16">16</xref>] for 24 hours and in Lillie’s buffered neutral formalin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref17">17</xref>] for 48 hours to better preserve hydro and lipophilic compounds, respectively. The material was isolated and dehydrated in a graded tertiary butanol series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref16">16</xref>] and embedded in Paraplast. The serial sections were stained with Safranin and Astra blue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref18">18</xref>], and Flemming’s triple staining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref16">16</xref>]. The sections were also examined under polarized light to verify the occurrence of starch grains, crystals and tracheary elements.</p><p>Histochemical tests were performed in both fresh and fixed material. Treatments and target compounds are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Standard control procedures were carried out according to the respective techniques.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Chemical Characterization of Nectar</title><p>The exudate from EFN of both species were collected with a microcapillary, clustered and stored in eppendorff tubes at −10˚C. A 10 μl aliquot of exudate was dissolved at a concentration of 50 μg/ml in water:methanol (7:3, v: v) containing 1% formic acid. These solutions were analysed by direct infusion with a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus) at a flow rate of 10 μL/min.</p><p>ESI-MS mass spectra were acquired in the positive ion mode using a hybrid high resolution Micromass Q-TOF mass spectrometer, under the following conditions: Capillary +3000 V, cone +40 V, dessolvation temperature 100˚C.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Results of the histochemical tests performed on EFN of Passiflora alata Curtis and P. edulis Sims.</p><p><img src="12-2600639\a744458c-cec0-4a21-a9b9-4c86e99a5430.jpg" /></p><p>Notes: <sup>*</sup>excitation at 350 - 390 nm; +, positive reaction; −, negative reaction.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Macromorphological Data and Field Observations</title><p>There is an asynchrony concerning the development and release of nectar from petiolar EFN of P. alata, where it all starts on glands close to the stem (basal glands, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). During secretory phase, nectar accumulates on the crateriform region of the nectary and is exhibited in the apex of the gland (upper gland, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)).</p><p>Anthocyanins are visualized on young organs of P. edulis exposed to sunlight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(e)). In this species, EFN presents a synchronous development and the release of nectar can be seen over the gland surface (Figures 1(f) and (g)).</p><p>The secretory phase of petiolar EFN is recognized since the second visible node in both species. Profuse exudate is registered only in plants whose base of branches was isolated with Tanglefoot grease (Figures 1(b), (f) and (g)). Crematogaster ants are observed collecting the nectar from both species (Figures 1(c) and (h)) and eventually can injure the secretory epidermis of EFN of P. edulis. Worker bees of Tetragonisca angustula also collect the nectar from P. alata (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)).</p><p>3.2. Micromorphological, Ontogenetic and Histochemical Data The meristematic phase of EFN is identified by the appearance of protuberances on the base of leaf primordium (Figures 2(a-c)). The presecretory phase of P. alata is characterized by the stretching of the peripheral portion until it acquires a stipitate-crateriform shape (Figures 3(a) and (b)). In P. edulis, the protuberances increase in volume until become flat in shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d)), an indicative of the beginning of presecretory phase; the</p><p>morphology of the EFN at the end of this phase is a convex shape, as a result of the increase in volume of the gland.</p><p>The asynchrony in the development of EFN of P. alata is shown in Figures 3(a) and 4(a). Only the central region of EFN has nectariferous cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)); the peripheral region consists of ordinary epidermal cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). Note in Figures 4(b) and 6(a) that pre-nectar can be seen inside nectariferous cells fixed in FAA. There is a differential preservation of cell content according to the fixative used.</p><p>The secretory phase is recognized by cuticle detachment in the central region of the petiolar EFN (Figures 3(c) and (e)-(g)). Initially, small elevations are observed and then they protrude, rising in the convex region (Figures 3(e)-(g)). The subcuticular space is shown in the transversal section of EFN (Figures 3(g), 4(c) and 6(c)). The anatomical features of EFN on secretory phase are presented ahead.</p><p>Nectariferous epidermis the multiple epidermis is covered with a thin cuticle (Figures 5(b) and (c), 6(b, e and f)) and cuticular flanges extend up to the inner periclinal wall of the first cell layer (Figures 5(c), 6(b and f)). The release of the nectar through nectariferous epidermis promotes the cuticle detachment. Nectar is confined to a subcuticular space, situated between the cuticle and the outer periclinal wall of epidermal cells (Figures 5(c) and 6(e)). Cuticle disruption was observed only after ants collect nectar from EFN of P. edulis.</p><p>Nectariferous parenchyma and subnectariferous parenchyma—are distinct in both species. Both tissues are separated from each other by vascular terminations (Figures 4(c) and 6(c)). EFN of P. alata possess secretory</p><p>idioblasts scattered through the nectariferous parenchyma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). The subnectariferous parenchyma presents few starch grains (Figures 4(d) and (e)) and crystals close to the vascular bundles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c)). Secretory idioblasts and starch grains are not visualized on EFN of P. edulis (Figures 6(a)-(f)).</p><p>Vascular tissue—the main trace comes from the petiole and it branches at the base of the nectary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). Vascular terminations consist of phloem only, and are embedded in the nectariferous parenchyma (Figures 4(c) and 6(c)).</p><p>The post-secretory phase is characterized by the establishment of fungal hyphae over the EFN secretory region in both species and by flattening the EFN edges of P. alata (Figures 3(d) and 4(g)).</p><p>The histochemical results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The tests indicate the presence of terpenoids, phenolic compounds and alkaloids inside idioblasts and some nectariferous cells of P. alata (Figures 5(d) and (g)). Fresh section of P. edulis EFN shows anthocyanin restricted to non-secretory epidermis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.3. Chemical Analysis of Nectar</title><p>Glucose, fructose and sucrose were detected in nectar of both species (Figures 7 and 8). The hexoses (mass 180 Da) were detected mainly as their sodium (m/z 203) and potassium (m/z 219) adducts. Glucose (mass341 Da) was observed as its protonated (m/z 342) form as well as sodium (m/z 365) and potassium (m/z 381) adducts.</p><p>Among the secondary metabolites, apigenin (flavonoid) was detected in both species (m/z 271) Harmine, an alkaloid, was found only in nectar of P. edulis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) as its sodium adduct (m/z 251).We searched for alkaloids and flavonoids commonly found in these species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref24">24</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Morphological and Ecological Considerations</title><p>The visual selection conditioned many diversifications of leaf morphology on Passiflora and other tropical plants</p><p>taxa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref8">8</xref>]. Behavioral experiments show that Heliconius butterflies present color vision as a possible answer to selection of the discriminative ability of oviposition sites by females [26-29], although the chemical stimuli are not excluded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>The sensibility spectra of color vision of Heliconiinae butterflies is 300 to 700 nm, where the peak of maximum sensibility is about 450 - 560 nm, corresponding to blue and yellow colors, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref28">28</xref>]. Agraulis vanillae, Eueides isabella and Heliconius erato stand out among heliconian species that consume P. alata leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref30">30</xref>]. The description of their eggs in the surveyed literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref31">31</xref>] shows morphological similarities with the petiolar EFN of P. alata. Butterflies of these species oviposit only on young organs of the plant that do not possess previous eggs [5,31]. The presence of egg mimics prevents the oviposition of heliconian females, avoiding the feeding of plants by caterpillars. These species lay their eggs isolatedly or in groups of up to three on E. isabella. The selective pressure from those heliconian species could explain the variation among the number of EFN that exists in the same individual of P. alata, simulating distinct ovipositions on each petiole.</p><p>Plants of P. edulis exposed to sunlight present anthocyanins on the epidermis of young organs and are less consumed in comparison to shaded individuals. Anthocyanins stand out as constitutive defenses that act over herbivorous and are modulated by plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref32">32</xref>]. The most accepted hypothesis for anthocyanins as legitimate antiherbivory defenses refers to the aposematic color observed in plants that possess this pigment, inhibiting herbivores that do not recognize the red color [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref33">33</xref>]. Heliconius species do not show sensibility to the wavelengths related to this color [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref25">25</xref>] and cannot recognize the young organs preferential to oviposition, which could justify the lower consumption of plants under sunlight. However, parasitism and predation of this species could increase the incidence of herbivory: those two events can overwhelm lianas present in sunlight areas and explain why some butterfly species are not common in those places [5,34].</p><p>Sugars present in the exudate are the main source of this substance to mutual Crematogaster ants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref35">35</xref>]. The observation of profuse nectar only after the isolation of branches with innocuous grease shows that the exudate is constantly collected. The asynchrony of EFN from P. alata can provide nectar for a long period, while the synchrony of P. edulis may offer a higher volume of this source. The test with Glicophita Plus indicated the presence of glucose in the exudate, ensuring that those glands are EFN. According to MS analysis, the nectar contains glucose, fructose and sucrose. These mono and disaccharides seem to be important food sources to ants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref36">36</xref>].</p><p>Besides ants, other insects as bees and wasps can also collect nectar from EFN [37-39]. This is the first register of Tetragonisca angustula collecting nectar from an EFN. These insects do not present an aggressive behavior. In this context, they are analogous to robber insects, in the same sense used for flower visitants that do not pollinate.</p><p>The secretory phase of petiolar EFN occurs on young organs of both species. Feeding preference experiments show that Heliconius larvae select young leaves of Passiflora [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref40">40</xref>]. The presence of glands at the secretory phase limited to young portions of the plant—as already observed in other species of Passiflora [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref41">41</xref>]—can be related to the preference of heliconian females to lay eggs on young organs of plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref6">6</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Structural Aspects</title><p>The ontogenetic development of EFN from P. alata and P. edulis is consistent with other Passifloraceae species: the glands arise from the activity of the protoderm, procambium and ground meristem [41,42]. It also occurs with foliar EFN from Turneraceae species—Passifloraceae sensu lato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref43">43</xref>]—and these glands are considered homologous structures [39,41,42]. The variation in the number of petiolar EFN, as found on P. alata and P. amethystina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref41">41</xref>], suggests the occurrence of serial homology. The selective pressure responsible for this variation can be related to the coevolution with heliconian.</p><p>The release of nectar through cuticle ruptures was observed on species that do not present the expansion of the EFN non-secretory region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref42">42</xref>]. However, the rupture founded in some EFN of P. edulis was associated with ant aggressive behavior during nectar collection. Although we found nectar accumulation in the subcuticular space of P. alata, there was no observation of cuticle rupture. Even though there is a report of the inexistence of pores on the cuticle of the Passiflora species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref42">42</xref>], we strongly suggest more accurate studies about cuticle structure during the secretory process.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Chemical and Functional Aspects</title><p>The crateriform morphology of EFN from P. alata can provide a microenvironment to confine terpenoids synthesized by the idioblasts, analogously to the corona in the flowers of Passiflora [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref44">44</xref>]. Terpenoids are the major volatile compounds issued by plants as an answer to herbivory, signalling to carnivorous arthropods either to prey or to parasitize herbivorous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref45">45</xref>].</p><p>According to histochemical tests and the analysis on mass spectrometry, secondary metabolites are retained inside secretory cells (idioblasts and nectariferous cells) of the EFN from P. alata. A possible function of this retention would be the decrease in herbivory of these glands.</p><p>Alkaloids and flavonoids do not accumulate in the petiolar EFN from P. edulis, but are present in trace amount in nectar, suggesting that the concentrations of these compounds both in nectar and inside secretory cells possess a pleiotropic effect on the phloem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref46">46</xref>]. The presence of secondary metabolites in nectar can be related to the attraction of specific consumers, since the deterrent or toxic nectar to some collector may not affect others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28480-ref47">47</xref>]. Alkaloids, flavonoids and terpenoids are antifungical [48-50]. These metabolites can inhibit fungi proliferation, since hyphae are only found on the nonsecretory region of EFN of P. edulis and over petiolar EFN of both species at post-secretory phase.</p><p>Although histochemical tests and analysis of the nectar on MS provide qualitative results, it is possible to establish a relationship between the relative concentrations of secondary metabolites inside the plant and released by them in the nectar through the sensibility of both techniques. The MS sensitivity is femtogram-order, allowing the detection of trace compounds, as those present in the nectar. Histochemical tests present a lower sensitivity of microgram-order, detecting compounds in a higher concentration. Therefore, alkaloids and flavonoids are more concentrated inside the idioblasts than in the nectar of P. alata. The relationship between the concentration of secondary metabolites inside and outside the plant and the commitment of the development of herbivores and/or nectar collectors can be plotted on a growth versus concentration diagram, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0.</p><p>The secondary metabolites present in higher concentration in the EFN of P. alata show deterrent function against herbivores. Those who are not able to detoxify these compounds undertake their development as these substances are accumulated in their organism. The low concentration of alkaloids and flavonoids in nectar is insufficient to affect the metabolism of collectors that establish a mutualistic relationship with P. alata and P. edulis. The analysis of the diagram suggests that the</p><p>modulation of the concentration of secondary metabolites allows the plant to relate differently to herbivores and mutualistic consumers, highlighting the importance of secretory tissues (idioblasts and nectariferous cells) in this process.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank to Prof. Dr. Carlos Roberto Brand&#227;o (Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo) and Prof. Dr. Marlies Sazima (Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas) for the identification of ants and bees, respectively. The first author was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tecnol&#243;gico (CNPq 131813/2008-0).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.28480-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. W. Benson, K. S. Brown and L. E. Gilbert, “Coevolution of Plants and Herbivorous: Passion Flowers Butterflies,” Evolution, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1975, pp. 659-680. 
doi:10.2307/2407076</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. S. Brown, “The Biology of Heliconius and Related Genera,” Annual Review of Entomology, Vol. 26, 1981, pp. 427-456. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.002235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. C. Spencer, “Chemical Mediation of Coevolution in the Passiflora-Heliconius Interaction,” In: K. C. Spencer, Ed., Chemical Mediation of Coevolution, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, 1988, pp. 168-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. E. Gilbert and J. T. Smiley, “Determinants of Local Diversity in Phytophagous Insects,” In: L. A. Mound and N. Walloff, Eds., Diversity of Insect Faunas, Blackwell Scientific, London, 1978, pp. 89-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. W. Benson, “Resource Partitioning in Passion Vine Butterflies,” Evolution, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1978, pp. 493-518. 
doi:10.2307/2407717</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. S. Williams and L. E. Gilbert, “Insects as Selective Agents on Plant Vegetative Morphology: Egg Mimicry Reduces Egg Laying by Butterflies,” Science, Vol. 212, No. 4493, 1981, pp. 467-469. 
doi:10.1126/science.212.4493.467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. R. Trigo, “The Chemistry of Antipredator Defense by Secondary Compounds in Neotropical Lepidoptera: Facts, Perspectives and Caveats,” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2000, pp. 551-561. 
doi:10.1590/S0103-50532000000600002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. E. Gilbert, “Butterfly-Plant Coevolution: Has Passiflora adenopoda Won the Selectional Race with Heliconiine Butterflies?” Science, Vol. 172, No. 3983, 1971, pp. 585-586. doi:10.1126/science.172.3983.585</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. F. Addicott, “Mutualistic Interactions in Population and Community Processes,” In: P. W. Price, C. N. Slobodchikoff and P. S. Gaud, Eds., A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, John Wiley, New York, 1984, pp. 437-451.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Fahn, “Structure and Function of Secretory Cells,” Advances in Botanical Research, Vol. 31, 2000, pp. 37-75. 
doi:10.1016/S0065-2296(00)31006-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Nicolson, M. Nepi and E. Pacini, “Nectaries and Nectar,” Springer-Verlag, The Netherlands, 2007. 
doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. S. Adler and R. E. Irwin, “Ecological Costs and Benefits of Defenses in Nectar,” Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 11, 2005, pp. 2968-2978. doi:10.1890/05-0118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. G. Varassin, J. R. Trigo and M. Sazima, “The Role of Nectar Production, Flower Pigments and Odour in the Pollination of Four Species of Passiflora (Passifloraceae) in South Eastern Brazil,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 136, No. 2, 2001, pp. 139-152. 
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2001.tb00563.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. C. A. Aguiar-Dias, L. Yamamoto and M. M. Castro, “Stipular Extranuptial Nectaries New to Polygala: Morphology and Ontogeny,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 166, No. 1, 2011, pp. 40-50. 
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01123.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. E. Kraus and M. Arduin, “Manual básico de métodos em morfologia vegetal,” EDUR, Seropédica, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. A. Johansen, “Plant Microtechnique,” McGraw-Hill Books, New York, 1940.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. D. Lillie, “Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry,” McGraw Hill, New York, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Gerlach, “Botanische Mikrotechnik,” Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgard, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. F. A. Mc Manus, “Histological and Histochemical Uses of Periodic Acid,” Stain Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1948, pp. 99-108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. G. E. Pearse, “Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied,” Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. David and J. P. Carde, “Coloration différentielle dês inclusions lipidique et terpeniques dês pseudophylles du pin maritime au moyen du reactif Nadi,” Comptes Rendus de I’Academie des Sciences Paris, Vol. 258, 1964, pp. 1338-1340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Tattini, E. Gravano, P. Pinelli, N. Milinacci and A. Romani, “Flavonoids Accumulate in Leaves and Glandular Trichomes of Phillyrea latifolia Exposed to Excess Solar Radiation,” New Phytologist, Vol. 148, No. 1, 2000, pp. 69-77. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00743.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. R. Yoder and P. G. Mahlberg, “Reactions of Alkaloid and Histochemical Indicators in Laticifers and Specialized Parenchyma Cells of Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae),” American Journal of Botany, Vol. 63, No. 9, 1976, pp. 1167-1173. doi:10.2307/2441734</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Dhawan, S. Kumar and A. Sharma, “Passiflora: A Review Update,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-23. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Crane, “Imaginal Behaviour of a Trinidad Butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with Special Reference to the Social Use of Color,” Zoologica, Vol. 40, 1955, pp. 167-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Crane, “Imaginal Behavior in Butterflies of the Family Heliconiidae: Changing Social Patterns and Irrelevant Actions,” Zoologica, Vol. 42, 1957, pp. 135-145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. A. Swihart, “Colour Discrimination by the Butterfly, Heliconius charitonius Linn,” Animal Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1971, pp. 156-164. 
doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(71)80151-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Struwe, “Spectral Sensitivity of Single Photoreceptors in the Compound Eye of a Tropical Butterfly (Heliconius numata),” Journal of Comparative Physiology, Vol. 79, No. 2, 1972, pp. 196-201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kelber, A. Balkenius and E. J. Warrant, “Colour Vision in Diurnal and Nocturnal Hawkmoths,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2003, pp. 571579. doi:10.1093/icb/43.4.571</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. C. Spencer, “Chemical Mediation of Coevolution in the Passiflora-Heliconius Interaction,” In: K. C. Spencer, Ed., Chemical Mediation of Coevolution, San Diego, Academic Press Inc., 1988, pp.168-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Dell’Erba, L. A. Kaminski and G. R. P. Moreira, “O estágio de ovo dos Heliconiini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil,” Iheringia Série Zoologia, Vol. 95, No. 1, 2005, pp. 29-46. 
doi:10.1590/S0073-47212005000100006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Koptur, “Extrafloral Nectary-Mediated Interactions between Insects and Plants,” In: E. Bernays, Ed., Insect Plant Interactions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992, pp. 81129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Karageorgou, C. Buschmann and Y. Manetas, “Red Leaf Color as a Warning Signal against Insect Herbivory: Hones or Mimetic?” Flora, Vol. 203, No. 8, 2008, pp. 648-652. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2007.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. L. Bentley, “Plants Bearing Extrafloral Nectaries and the Associated Ant Community Interhabitat Differences in the Reduction of Herbivory Damage,” Ecology, Vol. 57, No. 4, 1976, pp. 815-820. doi:10.2307/1936195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Lanza, “Ant Preferences for Passiflora Nectar Mimics That Contain Amino Acids,” Biotropica, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1988, pp. 341-344. doi:10.2307/2388328</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Heil, J. Pattke and W. Boland, “Postsecretory Hydrolysis of Nectar Sucrose and Specialization in Ant/Plant Mutualism,” Science, Vol. 308, No. 5721, 2005, pp. 560563. doi:10.1126/science.1107536</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. A. Baker, J. L. Hall and J. R. Thorpe, “A study of the Extrafloral Nectaries of Ricinus communis,” New Phytologist, Vol. 81, No. 1, 1978, pp. 129-137. 
doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01612.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. J. O’Dowd, “Foliar Nectar Production and Ant Activity on a Neotropical Tree, Ochroma pyramidale,” Oecologia, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1979, pp. 233-248. 
doi:10.1007/BF00344773</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. S. Elias, “Extrafloral Nectaries: Their Structure and Distribution,” In: B. Bentley and T. Elias, Eds., The Biology of Nectaries, Columbia University Press, New York, 1983, pp. 174-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. F. Denno and M. A. Donnelly, “Patterns of Herbivory on Passiflora Leaf Tissues and Species by Generalized and Specialized Feeding Insects,” Ecological Entomology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1981, pp. 11-16. 
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1981.tb00967.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. I. Rocha, L. C. Silva, V. M. M. Valente, D. M. T. Francino and R. M. S. A. Meira, “Morphoanatomy and Development of Leaf Secretory Structures in Passiflora amethystine Mikan (Passifloraceae),” Australian Journal of Botany, Vol. 57, No. 7, 2009, pp. 619-626. 
doi:10.1071/BT09158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. T. Durkee, “The Floral and Extra-Floral Nectaries of Passiflora. II. The Extra-Floral Nectary,” American Journal of Botany, Vol. 69, No. 9, 1982, pp. 1420-1428. 
doi:10.2307/2443103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APG III, “An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of flowering plants: APG III,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 161, No. 2, 2009, pp. 105-121. 
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. T. A. Garcia, B. G. Galati and O. S. Hoc, “Ultrastructure of the Corona of Scented and Scentless Flowers of Passiflora spp. (Passifloraceae),” Flora, Vol. 202, No. 4, 2007, pp. 302-315. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2006.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Tholl, C. M. Kish, I. Orlova, et al., “Formation of Monoterpenes in Antirrhinum majus and Clarkia breweri Flowers Involves Heterodimeric Geranyl Diphosphate Synthases,” The Plant Cell, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2004, pp. 977992. doi:10.1105/tpc.020156</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. S. Adler, “The Ecological Significance of Toxic Nectar,” Oikos, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2001, pp. 409-420. 
doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. L. Smith, J. Lanza and G. C. Smith, “Amino Acid Concentrations in Extrafloral Nectar of Impatiens sultani Increase after Simulated Herbivory,” Ecology, Vol. 71, No. 1, 1990, pp. 107-115. doi:10.2307/1940251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. A. Dixon and N. L. Paiva, “Stress Induced Phenylpropanoid Metabolism,” The Plant Cell, Vol. 7, No. 7, 1995, pp. 1085-1097.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. M. Kutchan, “A Role for Intraand Intercellular Translocation in Natural Product Biosynthesis,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2005, pp. 292-300. 
doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2005.03.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Otani, N. Shitan, K. Sakai, E. Martinoia, F. Sato and K. Yazaki, “Characterization of Vacuolar Transport of the Endogenous Alkaloid Berberine in Coptis japonica,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 138, 2005, pp. 1939-1946. 
doi:10.1104/pp.105.064352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28480-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Treutter, “Significance of Flavonoids in Plant Resistance: A Review,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2006, pp. 147-157. 
doi:10.1007/s10311-006-0068-8</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>