<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJCMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-6919</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjcmp.2013.31004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJCMP-28286</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Giant Magnetoimpedance of Cube/Feconi Electroplated Wires: Focus on Angular Sensoric
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alina</surname><given-names>Kurlyandskaya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pongsakorn</surname><given-names>Jantaratana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>Angeles Cerdeira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vladimir</surname><given-names>Va´kovskiy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Electricity and Electronics, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Campus of Leioa, Leioa, Spain; Department of Magnetism and Magnetic Nanomaterials, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Magnetism and Magnetic Nanomaterials, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Physics, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>galina@we.lc.ehu.es(AK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>5th,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>15th,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>26th,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Giant magnetoimpedance effect (GMI) is a subject of special interest proved by applied electrodynamic and technological applications. GMI effect in ferromagnetic tubes is connected with the high sensitivity of the magnetic system to a circular magnetic field near the spin-reorientation magnetic phase transitions offering high sensitivity with respect to an external magnetic field. In this work the non-magnetic CuBe wires were covered by Fe<sub>20</sub>Co<sub>6</sub>Ni<sub>74</sub> layers by electrodeposition. The thickness of 1 μm for magnetic layer was high enough in order to ensure the high GMI value. Longitudinal magnetic anisotropy was induced by post preparation annealing in a magnetic field of 160 A/m at 320℃ during 1 hour in order to obtain appropriate magnetisation process. Angular dependencies of GMI were measured in a frequency range of 1 to 10 MHz for driving currents of 2.5 to 20 mA. High longitudinal GMI of the order of 400% was observed at quite low frequency of 1 MHz. The highest value of the sensitivity of 520%/Oe was found for the active resistance: Linear sensitivities of 0.023 Ω/&#176; and 0.05 Ω/&#176; were observed for reasonably low fields of 240 and275 A/m respectively for small angles, where planar GMI elements are less effective.  
     
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Giant Magnetoimpedance; Magnetization Process; Magnetic Anisotropy; Magnetic Field Sensors</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Magnetic materials showing giant magnetoimpedance effect (GMI) are a subject of increasing interest because of fundamental applied electrodynamic interest and focus on technological and biomedical applications [1-3]. There were many studies of ferromagnetic resonance and GMI effects in electroplated wires [4,5]. It is established that high GMI value connected with the high sensitivity of the magnetic system to a circular magnetic field near the spin-reorientation magnetic phase transitions [6,7]. The magnetoimpedance phenomenon consists of the change of the total impedance, Z, and its real (R) and imaginary (X) parts of a ferromagnetic conductor under the application of an external magnetic field (H) when high frequency (f) alternating current flows through it [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>For the first time GMI in FeNi/CuBe electroplated wires was reported and clearly explained using a nonlinear nature of the observed phenomena-strong dependence of the induced voltage on the value of the external magnetic field by Beach et al in 1996 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref4">4</xref>]. Although term “impedance” belongs to the linear theory historically they use term “magnetoimpedance” for all cases [6,7]. Both linear and non-linear GMI sensitive elements are promising for the detectors of small magnetic fields offering the sensitivities up to the detection levels requested for biosensors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref3">3</xref>]. At the same time non-linear excitation regimes require higher values of the driving current (usually with an intensity above 40 mA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref4">4</xref>]) and therefore they are more energy consuming. Despite of the lower total value of the GMI effect and its sensitivity with respect to applied field, some studies were focused on the GMI features for the energy low consuming regimes, i.e. regimes with low intensities of the driving current [8-10].</p><p>Electrodeposition is well known and relatively cheap technique [4,11]. Electroplated wires are composite materials consisting of a conducting non-magnetic core and magnetically soft tube covering, which can be FeNi [4, 10], FeCoNi [5,6], CoP [12,13], Co [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref14">14</xref>], NiFeMo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref10">10</xref>], NiFeRu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref15">15</xref>]. A wide variety of compositions of magnetic layer was investigated in order to obtain as high as possible values of the GMI variations and high values of sensitivity with respect to an external magnetic field. The last parameter is a strict request for the design of small magnetic field sensors. Since 1996 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref4">4</xref>] when the firs work on GMI in electroplated wires was published, huge progress was made in the understanding of both linear and non-linear GMI: the highest values of the sensitivity for reasonably low frequencies were reported for FeNiCo/ CuBe electroplated wires in case of non-linear (high energy consuming) regimes [6,16]. Their deposition conditions like electrolytic current density, pH, in bath additives etc. were carefully studied [13,17].</p><p>The GMI responses depend on many parameters like alternating current amplitude and frequency, on effective magnetic permeability, magnetostriction, induced anisotropy etc. One therefore should search for optimised number of parameters to satisfy special condition of each particular application. It can be particular frequency, power consumption limit, the size of the sensitive GMI element, working field interval, working point for magnetic field, level of admitted hysteresis or the price of the circuit to solve the hysteresis problem etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref18">18</xref>]. In a majority of the studies of the GMI effect in electroplated wires with focus on applications they evaluated Z(H) features or simply induced voltage behaviour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref16">16</xref>] without complex analysis of different technological requests. For example, GMI responses of Fe<sub>20</sub>Ni<sub>64</sub>Co<sub>16</sub>/Cu<sub>98</sub>Be<sub>2</sub> electroplated wire were extremely high [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref16">16</xref>] for the exciting current of 40 mA and frequency of 4 MHz but the working interval was as narrow as almost zero: the magnetisation process looked rather like magnetisation reversal/discontinuity jump.</p><p>One of the requests of the market is automatic measurement of the angular dependence of the GMI. These studies are especially limited in case of the electroplated wires [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref19">19</xref>] which, in contrast with rapidly quenched amorphous ribbons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref20">20</xref>] or thin films [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref21">21</xref>] as it will be proved here show certain advantages.</p><p>In this work the non-magnetic Cu<sub>98</sub>Be<sub>2</sub> wires were covered by Fe<sub>20</sub>Co<sub>6</sub>Ni<sub>74</sub> layers by electroplating for development of GMI sensitive elements. The correlation between static magnetisation processes, the GMI effect value for the total impedance variation and its real and imaginary parts and angular dependence of the GMI with respect to an external magnetic field were studied with focus on electroplated wire particular applications as sensitive elements of the magnetic field angular detectors.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Details</title><p>Composite CuBe/FeCoNi wires were prepared by the electroplating of 1 μm Fe<sub>20</sub>Co<sub>6</sub>Ni<sub>74</sub> magnetic layer onto highly conductive Cu<sub>98</sub>Be<sub>2</sub> nonmagnetic cylinders of 100 μm f by elctrodeposition of 1 μm diameter electropolished prior to magnetic layer deposition. The electrochemical experiments were carried out in an electrochemical cell. Cu<sub>98</sub>Be<sub>2</sub> wires were used as cathode having an exposed area of approximately 0.12 cm<sup>2</sup>; the current density was as high as current density of about 25 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>. The thickness of the deposited magnetic layer was determined by the time of the deposition in carefully calibrated system. The composition, geometry and structure of the samples were studied by A JEOL 60 kV scanning electron microscope, SEM, equipped by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy system, EDX.</p><p>As a consequence of the technology (the electric current flowing along the wire during the electroplating creates a circular magnetic field and causes the appearance of the induced magnetic anisotropy and a circumferential magnetisation component) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref4">4</xref>] the longitudinal GMI in a magnetic field applied parallel to the wire axis in asprepared electroplated wires very often consisted of a very sharp impedance variation, i.e. discontinuity jumps which are not useful for application providing a very narrow working field range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref16">16</xref>]. Therefore in order to increase the working field range one can design appropriate magnetic anisotropy using corresponding post deposition heat treatments in external magnetic field or torsion annealing [6,20].</p><p>Magnetic field annealing in an Ar atmosphere was done under a constant magnetic field of 160 A/m applied along the axis of the wire at a temperature of 320˚C for 1 hour in order to induce effective longitudinal magnetic anisotropy. These conditions were defined using the procedure described in previous research works [5,6]. Fast cool down to room temperature allowed to conserve a magnetic anisotropy induced during the heat treatment. The value of the magnetic field of 160 A/m for above mentioned annealing was selected on the basis of the evaluation of the features of magnetisation curves, M(H), of non-annealed samples, measured at room temperature. It was much higher comparing to the value of the saturation field for the sample in the initial state. All studies were done at room temperature. The total length of the samples used for GMI measurements was 70 mm.</p><p>The value of the room temperature saturation magnetisation, M<sub>s</sub>, of the magnetic layer (about 9 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> A/m) was obtained from the measurements with a vibrating sample magnetometer of shorter samples of about 9 mm long. The estimated thicknesses of the magnetic layers calculated by structural and magnetic methods were close to each other. The inductive M(H) hysteresis loops were also measured by a conventional fluxmetric method at 30 Hz frequency for 70 mm samples. Resistivity of the non-magnetic CuBe wire was about 4 μΩ-cm and that of the FeCoNi magnetic layer was about 15 μΩ-cm.</p><p>The voltage drop across the electroplated wire was measured as a function of the external field by using a standard four-point technique both in increasing “up” branch and a decreasing “down” branch magnetic fields. The impedance changes were calculated by the Ohm’s law follow standard procedure [5,6]. The external magnetic field up to the maximum value, H<sub>max</sub> = &#177; 3 kA/m was created by a pair of CENCO 71267 Helmholtz coils. In all cases for each value of an external field the amplitude of the alternating current was adjusted to a requested value in order to maintain it constant, i.e. regardless of the voltage variations. The error in determining the impedance components was below 2%.</p><p>The measuring system was specially designed to allow a rotation of the test fixture with the sample in the external field with an accuracy of at least 2˚ for the angle, α, being the angle between the applied magnetic field and the wire axis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Total impedance and its real, and imaginary, parts were measured by HP 4284 A LCR meter for frequency range of 0.6 to 1 MHz with intensities of the sinusoidal driving current (I<sub>ac</sub>) of 2.5 to 20 mA. The MI ratios for total impedance ΔZ/Z and its real, ΔR/R, and imaginary, ΔX/X, parts were defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96155"><label>(1a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\8db457e3-b447-4199-94f8-e00fb8d6c5d8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96156"><label>(1b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\316aeefe-3b92-45a1-bf81-b234f079b221.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96157"><label>(1c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\af710df1-8cc1-40da-b71d-bbffadabc307.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where Z(H), R(H) and X(H) represent the impedance and its parts in a magnetic field H and the Z(H<sub>max</sub>), R(H<sub>max</sub>) and X(H<sub>max</sub>) the impedance and its real and imaginary part values in the field H<sub>max</sub> = &#177; 3 kA/m. The sensitivities of the GMI ratios with respect to the external magnetic field were defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96158"><label>(2a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\185bbd63-adca-4829-8741-135d8c282044.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96159"><label>(2b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\85872314-ad43-4efa-b34a-89d515c3d00f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96160"><label>(2c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\41ec82cf-6bc1-4766-bfde-00d225a55e04.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In case of the total impedance and its components the sensitivities can be also defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96161"><label>(3a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\8dbcb315-ec3e-4be1-a13b-eddc3ca2cf67.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96162"><label>(3b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\955fbb88-a901-4f97-8685-fd17d81c7055.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28286-formula96163"><label>(3c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-4800165\a675c1a8-b50a-4b49-a386-f338d803b438.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where DH = 0.2 is the change of the magnetic field. The maximum available sensitivities to a magnetic field, S<sub>max</sub> (DZ/Z), S<sub>max</sub> (DR/R), and S<sub>max</sub> (DX/X) were also calculated when necessary being the maximum observed sensitivities S(Z), S(R) and S(X).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the cross-section of the electroplated wire which was twisted and cut on purpose to distinguish better the magnetic layer and central conductor.</p><p>The non-magnetic CuBe conducting wire and magnetic Fe<sub>20</sub>Co<sub>6</sub>Ni<sub>74</sub> layer are clearly seen. One can evaluate the thickness of the magnetic layer as big as about 1 μm which was in a good agreement with the estimation data taken from the deposition time.</p><p>Analysis of VSM measurements and structural studies were consistent to each other indicating thickness of 1 μm for magnetic layer. EDX analysis indicated that actual composition was close to Fe<sub>20</sub>Co<sub>6</sub>Ni<sub>74</sub>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) explains geometry of the GMI measurements and gives the angles definition. The longitudinal magnetisation process, i.e. magnetisation process for the magnetic field applied along the wire axis (α = 0˚) and the field dependence of the GMI for smallest and highest of studied frequencies are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>For “down” branches of the magnetoimpedance one can see the broad maximum at a negative field and much narrower one in a positive field. In contrast with the Z(H) curves, the hysteresis loop of the electroplated wire have no visible peculiarities in the negative fields. The easy magnetisation direction in the as-prepared samples (not shown here) was nearly circumferential. As a result of the field annealing, the easy magnetisation axis partially rotates to the axial direction of the wire. Previous theoretical and experimental studies [4,5] considered that</p><p>the GMI curves of this kind of wires have two differently shaped peaks corresponding to two orientation phase transitions: the broad maximum at a negative field is of the second order and much narrower one in a positive field is of the first order. This explains a significant hysteresis observed both in the positive and negative fields close to the GMI maxima (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Although this kind of hysteresis is a disadvantage for technological applications it can be reduced either by the increase of the intensity of the alternating current [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref19">19</xref>] or by the design of double sensitive element configuration detector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>The impedance of the field annealed electroplated wire shows strong dependence on the magnetic field. Both the “up” and the “down” branches of Z(H) curves have two maxima in the field close to the anisotropy field of about 310 A/m estimated from the shape of the inductive hysteresis loop. Even for the smallest intensity of the driving current (I<sub>ac</sub> = 2.5 mA), rather high sensitivity of 0.82%/A/m was observed for the low frequency of 1 MHz convenient for many technological applications. The highest value of the total impedance MI ratio sensitivity (5.3%/A/m) was observed for I<sub>ac</sub> = 20 mA and f = 1 MHz which were kept for angular dependency studies of the MI response of the sensitive element. Despite of the fact that higher sensitivities were previously reported in the literature one should always compare the sensitivities obtained for different sensor elements in the same or as much as close conditions. For example, the highest sensitivity obtained by Garcia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28286-ref8">8</xref>] for FeNi/Cu wires for 1 MHz frequency was just as high as 0.038%/A/m for the wire of similar lengths and similar value of the intensity of the driving current.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the GMI variation (for total impedance, real and imaginary parts) of Fe<sub>20</sub>Co<sub>6</sub>Ni<sub>74</sub> electroplated wire based sensitive element in external magnetic field. It is clearly seen that total impedance and its real and imaginary parts show strong and similar dependence on a magnetic field (see also <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>): even shapes of the peaks in the positive and negative fields for R and X parts are similar to that observed for Z(H) dependence. In all cases the shape of the GMI curve can be described as characteristic two-peak response [5,16]. The maximum</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.28286-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Beach and A. E. Berkowitz, “Giant Magnetic Field Dependent Impedance of Amorphous FeCoSiB Wire,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 64, No. 26, 1994, pp. 3652-3654. doi:10.1063/1.111170</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Chiriac and T. A. Ovari, “Giant Magnetoimpedance Effect in Soft Magnetic Wire Families,” IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2002, pp. 3057-3062. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2002.802437</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. V. Kurlyandskaya, D. De Cos, and S. O. Volchkov, “Magnetosensitive Transducers for Nondestructive Testing Operating on the Basis of the Giant Magnetoimpedance Effect: A Review,” Russian Jornal of Nondestructive Testing, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2009, pp. 377-398.  
doi:10.1134/S1061830909060023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Garcia-Miquel, Bhagat, S. M. Bhagat, Lofland, S. E. Lofland, G. V. Kurlyandskaya and A. V. Svalov, “Ferromagnetic resonance in FeCoNi Electroplated Wires,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 94, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1868-1872. doi:10.1063/1.1590407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. V. Kurlyandskaya, N. G. Bebenin and V. O. Vas’kovskiy, “Giant Magnetic Impedance of Wires with a Thin Magnetic Coating,” The Physics of Metals and Metallogrpaphy, Vol. 111, No. 2, 2011, pp. 133-154.  
doi:10.1134/S0031918X11010200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. V. Kurlyandskaya, H. Yakabchuk, E. Kisker, N. G. Bebenin, H. García-Miquel, M. Vazquez and V. O. Vas’ kovskiy, “Very Large Magnetoimpedance Effect in Fe-CoNi Ferromagnetic Tubes with High Order Magnetic Anisotropy,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 90, No. 12, 2001, pp. 6280-6286. doi:10.1063/1.1418423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. S. Antonov, N. A. Buznikov, A. F. Prokoshin, A. L. Rakhmanov, I. T. Iakubov and A. M. Yakunin, “Nonlinear Magnetization Reversal in Copper-Permalloy Composite Wires Induced by a High-Frequency Current,” Technical Physics Letters, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2001, pp. 313315. doi:10.1134/1.1370211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Garcia, G. V. Kurlyandskaya, M. Vazquez, F. I. Toth, and L. K. Varga, “Infuence of Field Annealing on the Hysteretic Behaviour of the Giant Magneto-Impedance Effect of Cu Wires Covered with Ni80Fe20 Outer Shells,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 203, No. 1-3, 1999, pp. 208-210.  
doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00236-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. M. Garcia, A. Asenjo, M. Vázquez, A. M. Yakunin, A. S. Antonov and J. P. Sinnecker, “Determination of Closure Domain Penetration in Electrodeposited Microtubes by Combined Magnetic Force Microscopy and Giant Magneto-Impedance Techniques,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 89, No. 7, 2001 pp. 3888-3891.  
doi:10.1063/1.1346998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Velleuer, A.G. Munoz, H. Yakabchuk, C. Schiefer, A. Hackl and E. Kisker, “Giant Magneto Impedance in Electroplated NiFeMo/Cu Microwires,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 311, No. 2, 2007, pp. 651657. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.08.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. C. Mishra, “Microstructure, Magnetic and Magnetoimpedance Properties in Electrodeposited NiFe/Cu and CoNiFe/Cu Wire with Thiourea Additive in Plating Bath,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, Vol. 407, No. 6, 2012, pp. 923-934. doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.11.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. E. Atalay and S. Atalay, “Giant Magnetoimpedance Effect in NiFe/Cu Plated Wire with Various Plating Thicknesses,” Journal Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 392, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 322-328.  
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.09.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Favieres, C. Aroca, M. C. Sanchez, K. V. Rao and V. Madurga, “Giant Magnetoimpedance in Twisted Amorphous CoP Multilayers Electrodeposited onto Cu Wires,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 196, 1999, pp. 224-226. doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00775-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Jantaratana and C. Sirisathitkul, “Effects of Thickness and Heat Treatments on Giant Magnetoimpedance of Electrodeposited Cobalt on Silver Wires,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2006, pp. 358-362.  
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2005.863270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. E. Atalay, H. Kaya and S. Atalay, “Magnetoimpedance Effect in Electroplated NiFeRu/Cu Wire,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2006, pp. 431436. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/3/001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. V. Kurlyandskaya, A. García-Arribas and J. M. Barandiaran, “Advantages of Nonlinear Giant Magnetoimpedance for Sensor Applications,” Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 106, No. 1-3, 2003, pp. 234-239.  
doi:10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00174-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. T. Tung, D. V. A. Dung, N. D. Long and A.-T. Le, “Effects of Electrolytic Current Density on Structural, Magnetic Properties and GMI Behavior in Electrodeposited Bilayer FeNi/Cu Composite Wires,” Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2012, pp. 2499-2505. 
doi:10.1007/s10948-012-1677-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Mohri, T. Uchiyama and L. V. Panina, “Recent Advances of Micro Magnetic Sensors and Sensing Application,” Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 59, No. 1-3, 1997, pp. 1-8. doi:10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80141-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Jantarantana, N. G. Bebenin and G. V. Kurlyandskaya, “Magnetoimpedance and Magnetization Processes of FeCoNi Electroplated tubes,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 105, No. 1, 2009, pp. 013908-013914.  
doi:10.1063/1.3054365</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. V. Kurlyandskaya, J. M. Barandiaran, M. Vazquez, D. Garcia and N. V. Dmitrieva, “Infuence of Geometrical Parameters on the Giant Magnetoimpedance Response in Amorphous Ribbons,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 215-216, 2000, pp. 740-742.  
doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00274-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Yamaguchi, M. Takezawa, H. Ohdaira, K. I. Arai and A. Haga, “Directivity and Sensitivity of High-Frequency Carrier Type Thin-Film Magnetic Field Sensor,” Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 81, No. 1-3, 2004, pp. 102-105.  
doi:10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00096-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28286-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Hauser, L. Kraus and P. Ripka, “Giant Magnetoimpedance Sensors,” IEEE Instrumentation &amp; Measurement Magazine, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2001, pp. 28-32.  
doi:10.1109/5289.930983</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>