<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MME</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Modern Mechanical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-0165</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/mme.2013.31005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MME-28255</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Application Study on Multi-Vary Analysis
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>iaomin</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Business School, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>lygxxm@126.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>11,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this article, we studied the bearings made by one company in Shanghai. Through statistical process controlling the quality characteristic of bearings’ diameters and multi-vary analysis is applied to find the key variation factors which have an influence on the quality characteristic of the bearings, the quality level of the bearings of this company is improved. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Statistical Process Control; Multi-Vary Analysis; Process Capability Index</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Background and Signification</title><p>The manufacturing in China is developing fast through 30 years reform and opening up. China has firmly established itself as a manufacturing power in the world. At the same time, we should see that Chinese manufacturing is large but not strong. The improvement of product quality lags behind the growth of economic scale. The whole level of product quality has a gap with the developed countries. With the bearing for instance, China is a power of bearings, but the most is belonging to medium or lower end product. It is the lag of R&amp;D capability, equipment and handcrafts that result in the precision of bearing unsure. If the precision of bearing can not meet the quailfication, the steel plate is unqualified. Therefore, it is essential subject to study through technology improvement which can advance bearing quality and increase enterprise benefit.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Literature Summary</title><p>SPC (statistical process control) is a tool of process control by means of mathematical statistics method. It analyses and controls the process by using the statistical law nature of figure fluctuation. Control chart becomes the one of most important tool of management after birth of the first control chart.</p><p>Zhen He, Ershi Qi, Shenghu Zhang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28255-ref1">1</xref>] proposed that in practice, the control chart is always of on effect because the sampling plan can not capture the key random variation in spite of the statistical characteristics of <img src="5-80402\a5c71e09-954a-423f-b02a-d09120ab5b1c.jpg" /> chart is theoretically thorough studied. Zhonghua Yu, Shaotong Wu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28255-ref2">2</xref>] pointed out the control chart method proposed by W. A. Shewhart forecasts and controls production by using the output of process; it is essentially lack of regularity description of process change itself. D. C. Montgomery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28255-ref3">3</xref>] presented that the traditional control chart of W. A. Shewhart is an available tool only in controlling single variation source. S. W. Well, J. D. Smith [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28255-ref4">4</xref>] proposed that the control chart of W. A. Shewhart often gives a false warning when there are variations in batches of product or shifts of production of the process of production. The main reason is that the control chart of W. A. Shewhart is based on a single variation. M. Hamada, R. J. Mackay, and J. B. Whitney [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28255-ref5">5</xref>] proposed that the key is to determine the source of variation in the application of traditional Shewhart control chart.</p><p>As to how to control the problem of multiple variation sources, product quality problems caused by the variation source can be known if we can make sure of sources of variation and proportions in all variation factors. Then we can take relevant measures according to the relative size of variation source and proportion.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Empirical Study</title><p>In this article, the CHTD5/7 model bearings made by one company in Shanghai were taken for research objects. The quality remand of the diameter is considered as the key factor because it has a directly effect on the final assembly of pumps.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. <img src="5-80402\1643c541-3d92-43eb-873a-6ceeaf89977c.jpg" />Control Chart and Process Capability Index</title><p>CHTD5/7-type self-bearing diameter quality requirements: Φ (60 &#177; 0.02) mm. When the products are processing, five samples per half hour are taken. And the data of its inner diameters are shown in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. So we can get 20 groups of data (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Bearing data.</p><p><img src="5-80402\16ffe7d3-3c0b-4b4f-b290-5ef25a8da5d8.jpg" /></p><p>a. Unit: mm So we can get the <img src="5-80402\b2c97d6e-6337-4f4a-b2db-ddf973c024c7.jpg" />control Chart (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>From the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, we can see that all the sample points are in the control limits and the arrangements of the points are not abnormal. So we come to the conclusion that the procedure of bearings is controlled.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, we obtain the average value of samples is 60.0033 mm and the Standard Deviation is 0.00717 mm<sup>2</sup>.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28255-formula116072"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-80402\89f02ef1-9f4e-4f76-8d34-a4a7c19b8912.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Following the above equation, we can obtain: C<sub>pk</sub> ≈ 0.77. It shows that the process capability is deficient because 0.77 less than 1.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Application of Multi-Vary Method</title><p>In multi-vary analysis (MVA), the variation sources of process quality characteristics are divided into time to time variation, piece to piece variation and within piece variation. After on-site analysis, the main factor affecting the diameter of bearings is the taper and the non-concentricity. The different tapers of two ends of bearings</p><p>can not make the bearings keep in parallel. It maybe has an influence on the contact area when bearings are used. And the different non-concentricity of bearings can make the circle centers of bearing two ends unsymmetrical and cause these bearings can not be assembly.</p><p>First, the systematic analysis chart of quality variation is drawn (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Data Collection and Analysis</title><p>The sample data at 8:00, 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00 are collected to analyze the quality characteristics of diameters of bearings.</p><p>• This can not only ensure the continuity of time, but also collect sufficient data.</p><p>• Considering that the bearing itself has a certain errors and there are some errors existing in measure, we take three bearing samples in every time span.</p><p>• We twirl each bearing to read the data of the maximum and the minimum of the left and the right. Then we can get four data of every bearing.</p><p>There are data of monitoring as follows. (Tables 2-7)</p><p>The multi-vary data analysis at 8:00 is as follows:</p><p>1) Within piece variation:</p><p>Different tapers variation = |the value of the left average diameter of samples – the value of the right average diameter of samples| = 60.014 − 60.010 = 0.004.</p><p>Different non-concentricity variation = the maximum of average diameter of samples – the minimum of average diameter of samples = 60.012 − 60.011 = 0.001.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. 8:00 data of bearing and corresponding figures.</p><p><img src="5-80402\49dfc743-499e-4f2c-94aa-e14ddd5ef899.jpg" /></p><p>8:00 the average diameter value of three samples = 60.012.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. 9:00 data of bearing and corresponding figures.</p><p><img src="5-80402\954f0c09-df44-4f9e-83a4-6380594db20f.jpg" /></p><p>2) Piece to piece variation:</p><p>Sample 1 − 2 = |the average of sample 1 – the average of sample 2| = 60.013 − 60.012 = 0.001.</p><p>Sample 2 − 3 = |the average of sample 2 – the average of sample 3| = 60.013 − 60.011 = 0.002.</p><p>3) Time to time variation:</p><p>By parity of reasoning, five time span variation values are obtained. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>)</p><p>By analogy, we can obtain five time variation values.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. 10:00 data of bearing and corresponding figures.</p><p><img src="5-80402\bb33a4ac-91a4-4779-baf0-49fb1cef2083.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. 11:00 data of bearing and corresponding figures.</p><p><img src="5-80402\fd05e4fb-a88e-4fb3-a1f0-9cae74e949f9.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. 12:00 data of bearing and corresponding figures.</p><p><img src="5-80402\9c0499ae-6e97-4d41-aae2-f75fda2007b5.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Process Improvement Suggestion</title><p>Through field analysis on the above sample data, we can offer a proposal on improving process quality of bearings. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>)</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Taking Data of Bearings Anew</title><p>We take the inner diameter data of bearings of one process through the above adjustment. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>)</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>, we obtain the average value of samples is 60.0019 mm and the Standard Deviation is 0.00542 mm<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>. Multi-vary data of bearing.</p><p><img src="5-80402\84cfe768-d4a9-43e6-86b4-813fc58f5dd0.jpg" /></p><p>By analogy, we can obtain five time variation values.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. Quality variation reason and modification table.</p><p><img src="5-80402\fb116a1f-3a6b-4466-baa2-092abcc591c0.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>. Bearing data.</p><p><img src="5-80402\37d1c303-16bb-4c1c-8951-8c4268b3cde0.jpg" /></p><p>a. Unit: mm.</p><p>According to the Equation (1), we can obtain C<sub>pk</sub> = 1.11. For 1 ≤ C<sub>pk</sub> ≤ 1.33, the process capability is normal. The goal has now been finally attained through the multivary analysis of bearings.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In brief, the process capability is improved through the multi-vary analysis to the CHTD5/7 model bearings made by one company in Shanghai, so the quality of bearings is made better.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.28255-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Zhen, E. S. Qi and S. H. Zhang, “Some Problems in the Application of   Control Chart,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management in China, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2000, pp. 4-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28255-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. H. Yu and S. T. Wu, “Study on Quality Control Method in Small Batch Manufacturing Process,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2001, pp. 3-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28255-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. C. Montgomery, “Design and Analysis of Experiments,” John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 2526.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28255-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Well and J. D. Smith, “Making Control Chart Work for You,” Semiconductor International, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1991, pp. 24-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28255-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Hamada, R. J. Mackay and J. B. Whitney, “Continuous Process Improvement with Observational Studies,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1993, pp. 77-84.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>